PART V.] [TO BE CONTINUED.

INDEX

EXPURGATORIUS

ANGLICANUS:

OR

A DESCRIPTIVE CATALOGUE OF THE PRINCIPAL BOOKS

PRINTED OR PUBLISHED IN ENGLAND,

WHICH HAVE BEEN SUPPRESSED,

OR BURNT BY THE COMMON HANGMAN,

OR CENSURED,

OR FOR WHICH THE AUTHORS, PRINTERS, OR PUBLISHERS

HAVE BEEN PROSECUTED.

BY W. H. HART, F.S.A.

PRICE ONE SHILLING AND SIXPENCE.

LONDON:

JOHN RUSSELL SMITH, 36, SOHO SQUARE.

1878.

HART AND SON, PRINTERS,] [SAFFRON WALDEN.

261.

A letter to Mr. Miles Prance in relation to the murder of Sir

Edmundbury Godfrey.

A copy of this publication is preserved in the British Museum

Library. It is in folio, and contains three pages. For its

condemnation see article 265.

262.

A second letter to Miles Prance in reply to the Ghost of Sir

Edmundbury Godfrey.

A copy of this publication is preserved in the British Museum

Library. It is in folio, and contains four pages. For its

condemnation see article 265.

263.

The Loyal Protestant and True Domestic Intelligence, or News both

from City and Country. No. 125, Tuesday, March 7, 1682.

A copy of this newspaper is preserved in the British Museum

Library. For its condemnation see article 265.

264.

The Loyal Protestant and True Domestic Intelligence, or News both

from City and Country. No. 127, Saturday, March 11, 1682.

A copy of this newspaper is preserved in the British Museum

Library. For its condemnation see next article.

265.

The Loyal Protestant and True Domestic Intelligence, or News both

from City and Country. No. 136, April 1, 1682.

For this, and the publications described in articles 261 to

264 importing that Sir Edmundbury Godfrey murdered himself, a

prosecution was instituted against Nathaniel Thompson, William

Pain, and John Farwell, and on Tuesday, June 20th, 1682, they were

tried at the Guildhall, London, and found guilty. Thompson and

Farwell were sentenced to stand on the pillory in the Palace Yard,

the last day of Term, between the hours of Ten and One o'clock,

for the space of an hour, and each of them to pay a fine of £100,

and to be imprisoned until they paid it. Pain was only to pay a

fine of £100. Accordingly, on Wednesday, the 5th of July, 1682,

Thompson and Farwell stood in the pillory, in the Old Palace Yard,

at Westminster, with this writing over their heads--

"For libelling the Justice of the Nation, by making the world

believe that Sir Edmundbury Godfrey murdered himself."

The following is a copy of the information:--

Memorandum quod Robertus Sawyer miles, Attornatus domini Regis

nunc Generalis, qui pro eodem domino Rege in hac parte sequitur,

in propria persona sua venit hic in curiam dicti domini Regis,

coram ipso Rege apud Westmonasterium, die Mercurii proximo post

quindenam Paschæ isto eodem termino, et pro eodem domino Rege dat

curiæ hic intelligi et informari, quod die Martis proximo post

crastinum Purificationis Beatæ Mariæ Virginis, termino Sancti

Hillarii annis regni domini Caroli Secundi nunc Regis Angliæ &c.

tricesimo et tricesimo primo, in curia dicti domini Regis coram

ipso Rege apud Westmonasterium, eadem curia apud Westmonasterium

in comitatu Middlesexiæ tunc tenta existente, per sacramentum

duodecim juratorum proborum et legalium hominum comitatus

Middlesexiæ prædictæ tunc et ibidem juratorum et oneratorum ad

inquirendum pro dicto domino Rege et corpore comitatus prædicti,

extitit præsentatum quod Robertus Greene nuper de parochia Sanctæ

Mariæ le Strond in comitatu Middlesexiæ Laborer, [ ] Gerrald nuper

de parochia prædicta in comitatu prædicto clericus, Henricus

Berry nuper de parochia prædicta in comitatu prædicto Laborer,

Laurencius Hill nuper de parochia prædicta in comitatu prædicto

Laborer, Dominicus Kelly nuper de parochia prædicta in comitatu

prædicto clericus, et Philbert Vernat nuper de parochia prædicta

in comitatu prædicto Laborer, Deum præ oculis suis non habentes,

sed instigatione diabolica moti et seducti, duodecimo die Octobris

anno regni domini Caroli Secundi Dei gratia Angliæ Scotiæ Franciæ

et Hiberniæ Regis Fidei Defensoris &c. tricesimo, vi et armis

&c. apud parochiam Sanctæ Mariæ le Strond prædictæ in comitatu

Middlesexiæ prædictæ in et super quendam Edmundum Berry Godfrey

militem, in pace Dei et dicti Domini Regis nunc adtunc et ibidem

existentem, felonice, voluntarie, et ex malitia sua præcogitata,

insultum fecerunt. Et quod prædictus Robertus Greene quoddam

sudarium panni lini _anglice a linen handkerchiffe_, valoris sex

denariorum, circa collum ipsius Edmundi Berry Godfrey adtunc

et ibidem felonice, voluntarie, et ex malitia sua præcogitata,

plicavit, et fixavit _anglice did fold, and fasten_. Et quod

prædictus Robertus Greene cum prædicto sudario sic per ipsum

Robertum Greene plicato et fixato circa collum ipsius prædicti

Edmundi Berry adtunc ipsum prædictum Edmundum Berry Godfrey

felonice, voluntarie, et ex malitia sua præcogitata, suffocavit

et strangulavit _anglice, choake and strangle_, de quibusquidem

suffocatione, et strangulatione ipsius Edmundi Berry Godfrey

prædicti, per ipsum prædictum Robertum Greene in forma prædicta

factis et perpetratis, ipse prædictus Edmundus Berry Godfrey adtunc

et ibidem instanter obiit. Et quod prædicti [ ] Gerrald, Henricus

Berry, Laurentius Hill, Dominicus Kelly, et Philbert Vernat, adtunc

et ibidem felonice, voluntarie, et ex malitia sua præcogitata

fuerunt præsentes, auxiliantes, abettantes, comfortantes,

assistentes, et manutenentes præfatum Robertum Greene ad prædictum

Edmundum Berry Godfrey in forma prædicta felonice, voluntarie, et

ex malitia sua præcogitata, interficiendum et murdrandum. Et sic

juratores prædicti adtunc dixerunt super sacramentum suum prædictum

quod prædictus Robertus Greene, [ ] Gerrald, Henricus Berry,

Laurencius Hill, Dominicus Kelly, et Philbert Vernat, modo et forma

prædictis, præfatum Edmundum Berry Godfrey felonice, voluntarie, et

ex malitia sua præcogitata, interfecerunt et murdraverunt, contra

pacem dicti domini Regis nunc, coronam et dignitatem suas &c.,

per quod præceptum fuit vicecomiti comitatus prædicti quod non

omitteret &c. quin caperet eos si &c., ad respondendum &c. Quodque

postea, scilicet die Mercurii proximo post crastinum Purificationis

Beatæ Mariæ Virginis, termino Sancti Hillarii, anno regni domini

Caroli Secundi nunc Regis Angliæ &c. tricesimo et tricesimo primo

supradicto coram domino Rege apud Westmonasterium venerunt prædicti

Robertus Greene, Henricus Berry, et Laurencius Hill sub custodia

Willielmi Richardson generosi tunc custodis gaoli dicti domini

Regis de Newgate virtute brevis dicti domini Regis de Habeas

Corpus ad subjiciendum, recipiendum &c. in cujus custodia præantea

ex causa predicta commissi fuerunt ad barram prædictæ curiæ dicti

domini Regis tunc et ibidem ducti in propria persona sua, et adtunc

et ibidem statim de præmissis prædictis eis superius impositis

separatim allocuti qualiter se velint inde acquietari separatim,

dixerunt quod ipsi in nullo fuerunt inde culpabiles et inde de

bono et malo posuerunt se separatim super patriam. In quaquidem

causa taliter processum fuit quod prædictus Robertus Greene,

Henricus Berry, et Laurencius Hill postea scilicet die Lunæ proximo

post octabas Purificationis Beatæ Mariæ Virginis termino Sancti

Hillarii annis regni dicti domini Regis nunc tricesimo et tricesimo

primo supradictis, in prædicta curia dicti domini Regis coram

ipso Rege apud Westmonasterium prædictum in comitatu Middlesexiæ

prædictæ, pro felonia et murdro prædictis in indictamento prædicto

specificatis et contentis per quandam juratam patriæ debito modo

triati fuerunt et adtunc et ibidem legitimo modo pro felonia et

murdro prædictis convicti et attincti fuerunt, prout per recordum

inde in prædicta curia dicti domini Regis coram ipso Rege apud

Westmonasterium in comitatu Middlesexiæ prædictæ remanens filatum

plenius liquet et apparet. Qui quidem Robertus Greene, Henricus

Berry, et Laurencius Hill postea debito modo executi fuerunt,

et pænam mortis subierunt juxta formam et effectum judicii et

attincturæ prædictorum. Cumque etiam quidam Milo Prance, super

triationem prædictum fuit testis productus et juratus ex parte

dicti domini Regis nunc adtunc et ibidem legitimo modo dedisset

materialem evidenciam versus prædictos Robertum Greene, Henricum

Berry, et Laurencium Hill ad probandum ipsos fore culpabiles de

felonia et murdro prædictis in indictamento prædicto specificatis.

Et quidam Willielmus Bedlowe, Johannes Browne, Elizabetha Curtis,

Zacharias Skillarne, et Nicholaus Cambridge super triationem

prædictum fuerunt testes similiter producti et jurati ex parte

dicti domini Regis, et diversas materiales evidentias versus

prædictos Robertum Greene, Henricum Berry, Laurencium Hill, ad

probandum ipsos fore culpabiles de felonia et murdro prædictis in

eodem indictamento mentionatis dederunt. Cumque etiam prædicti

[ ] Gerrald, Robertus Greene, Laurencius Hill, Dominicus Kelly

et Philbert Vernat tempore feloniæ et murdri prædictorum fuerunt

Papistæ et manutentores Romanæ superstitionis. Et prædicti [ ]

Gerrald, Dominicus Kelly, et Philbert Vernat fugam fecerunt et ad

indictamentum prædictum adhuc non comparuerunt nec aliquis eorum

comparuit. Cumque etiam super visum corporis prædicti Edmundi Berry

Godfrey mortui jacentis quædam inquisitio debito modo capta fuit

coram Johanne Cooper generoso tunc uno coronatorum dicti domini

Regis comitatus Middlesexiæ prædictæ per sacramentum proborum et

legalium hominum comitatus Middlesexiæ ultra numerum duodecim

personarum per quamquidem inquisitionem compertum fuit quod quidam

malefactores ignoti felonice et ex malitia sua præpensa ipsum

Edmundum Berry Godfrey strangulaverunt et suffocaverunt de qua

obiit. Et quod quidam Nathaniel Thompson nuper de parochia Sancti

Dunstani in Occidente Londoniæ Typhographus, Willielmus Payne

nuper de parochia prædicta infra civitatem Londoniæ generosus, et

Johannes Farwell nuper de Westmonasterio in comitatu Middlesexiæ

generosus præmissa prædicta satis scientes, et existentes personæ

diabolice effecti ac machinantes practicantes et totis viribus

suis intendentes pacem et communem tranquillitatem hujus regni

Angliæ perturbare et quantum in ipsis fuit debitum legis cursum

corrumpere, subvertere, et evadere, et justitiam hujus regni Angliæ

in ea parte defamare et scandalizare et tam præfatos Milonem

Prance, Willielmum Bedlowe, Johannem Browne, Elizabetham Curtis,

Zachariam Skillarne, et Nicholaum Cambridge quam prædictos Johannem

Cooper et probos et legales homines super inquisitionem prædictam

super visum corporis prædicti juratos in maximum odium contemptum

et vilipendium cum omnibus ligeis subditis dicti domini Regis nunc

inducere et inferre ac ad deterrendum subditos dicti domini Regis

a comparendo detigendo et probando machinationes Papistorum contra

dominum Regem nunc et veram religionem per legem nunc stabilitatam

et impie et nefarie machinantes et intendentes ipsos prædictos

[ ] Gerrald, Dominicum Kelly et prædictum Philbertum Vernat a

subeundo pænas et sententias per legem super ipsos infligendas pro

murdro prædicto ac ad auxiliandum et assistandum ipsos quamvis

inde culpabiles fore compertos minime culpabiles ac ad decipiendum

et fallandum subditos dicti domini Regis de et in præmissis cum

falsis affirmantiis et agreamentis suis et causare et procurare

quod creditum foret et estimaretur quod prædicti Robertus Greene,

Henricus Berry, et Laurencius Hill personæ, sic ut præfertur, pro

felonia et murdro prædictis prædicti Edmundi Berry convicti et

executi minus rite convicti et executi fuissent, quodque prædictus

Edmundus Berry Godfrey fuit felo de se et seipsum felonice

murdrasset, ipsi prædicti Nathaniel Thompson, Willielmus Payne,

et Johannes Farwell ad nequissimas, nefandissimas, et diabolicas

intentiones suas prædictas perimplendas et proficiendas postea

scilicet vicesimo tertio die Februarii anno regni domini Caroli

Secundi nunc Regis Angliæ &c. tricesimo quarto apud parochiam

Sanctæ Mariæ le Bow Londoniæ vi et armis &c. falso, illicite,

injuste, nequiter, malitiose, scandalose, et diabolice, fecerunt,

composuerunt et imprimi causaverunt quendam falsum, scandalosum,

et defamatorium libellum intitulatum, _A Letter to Mr. Miles

Prance, in relation to the murther of Sir Edmondbury Godfrey_,

in quoquidem libello inter alia continetur prout sequitur. _And

hearing that the Coroner's Jury or Inquest were first of opinion,

and accordingly declared, he was felo de se; and that there was

much art and skill used to procure their verdict to the contrary;

more particularly, the refusing of the body, (at their instance and

request) to be opened._ Ac in alio loco ejusdem libelli ulterius

continetur prout sequitur. _They say, that if a man, or any other

creature be strangled, or hanged, and his body cold, and the blood

settled in the veins_ (_as he must needs be, if your evidence be

true_) (evidentiam prædicti Milonis Prance innuendo) _run twenty

swords through such a body, not one drop of blood will come out;

but on the contrary, his body, when found, was full of blood, in so

much that (over and above the cakes or great gobbets of congealed

putrified blood found afterwards in his cloaths) the constable

when he pulled the sword out of his body, it crashed against his

back bone, and gobbets of blood and water gushed or gubbled out

of that wound in abundance, not only in that very place where the

sword was pulled out but in all his passage to the Whitehouse;

especially there where his body was lifted over two high stumps;

and also when he was laid upon the table, the blood and water so

issued out of that wound, that it ran from off the table upon the

floor, and from thence into the cellar. So that they do aver, that

that wound that he received by that sword, must of necessity be

the cause of his death._ Ac in alia parte ejusdem libelli ulterius

continetur prout sequitur, _They observe, that Bedloe's, (before

the Committee of Lords), and your evidence in relation to this

gentleman's death, are as different as the East is from the West;

for you dog him out of St. Clement's; the other decoys him from

Charing Cross; you swear he was strangled with a handkerchief near

the stables going to the water-side; Bedloe, that he was smothered

with a pillow in a room in the great Court in Somerset-house.

You say, he took horse at Soho; Bedlow says, he took Coach at

Clarendon-house, with many more such like contradictions; and

considering the old proverb, fore-warn'd, fore arm'd; a further

and fuller account of the whole matter expect._ Quodque prædicti

Nathaniel Thompson, Willielmus Payne et Johannes Farwell ad

nequissimas nefandissimas et diabolicas intentiones suas prædictas

perimplendas et proficiendas postea scilicet tertio die Marcii anno

regni dicti domini Regis nunc tricesimo quarto [_word defaced_]

apud parochiam Sanctæ Mariæ le Bow Londoniæ prædictæ vi et armis

et falso, illicite, injuste, nequiter, malitiose, scandalose, et

diabolice, fecerunt composuerunt et imprimi causaverunt quendam

alium falsum scandalosum et defamatorium libellum intitulatum,

_A Second Letter to Miles Prance, in reply to the Ghost of Sir

Edmondbury Godfrey_, in quoquidem ultimo mencionato libello inter

alia continetur prout sequitur. _Next, whereas my letter saith,

(and that truly) that the Coroner's Jury were first of opinion

and accordingly declared he was felo de se; and that much art and

skill was used to procure their verdict to the contrary._ Ac in

alio loco ejusdem ultimo mencionati libelli inter alia continetur

prout sequitur. _And it would be very material, if the Coroner

would declare, what he received for that job, and of whom, and what

evidence he had to induce the Jury to find (as the inquisition

imports) that he was strangled with a linen cloth, a matter of fact

never so much as spoken of, until you came in with your evidence,

which was not in some weeks after. And I do again aver, that the

body was required by the jurors to be opened, and was refused; and

if the body was in their and the Coroner's power (as the Ghost

insinuates) such power was concealed from and denied the Jury._

Et in alio loco ejusdem ultimo mentionati libelli inter alia

continetur prout sequitur, _He is to understand that Mr. Brown,

the two surgeons_ (prædictos Zachariam Skillarne, et Nicholam

Cambridge innuendo) _and Mrs. Curtis are not competent (nor can be

material) witnesses in this case._ Et in alio loco ejusdem ultimo

mentionati libelli inter alia ulterius continetur prout sequitur,

_But Mr. Prance, it will be fully proved, that the body was full

of blood, and that there were cakes or gobbets of dry blood found

in his cloaths, which (with his body) stunk extremely. And it

will be also fully and effectually proved that his eyes, nostrils,

and corners of his mouth were fly-blown._ Ac in alio loco ejusdem

ultimo mentionati libelli inter alia continetur prout sequitur,

_And as to the seventh and last paragraph, which relates only to

the difference betwixt yours and Mr. Bedlow's evidence, I must take

notice, that what you and he swear are very contradictory._ Et in

alio loco ejusdem ultimo mentionati libelli inter alia ulterius

continetur prout sequitur, _But I cannot omit to take further

notice of Mrs. Curtis's affidavit in relation to the drops of wax

found upon the cloaths, in which I cannot say but she may swear

true: but this I do aver, that if it be so, those drops were put

upon the cloaths long after he was found, and after the jury had

sat on the body; for there was no such thing then on the cloaths.

And I suppose this was some artifice used by those, who, either

out of interest or design, were desirous to confirm his being

murthered at Somerset-House._ Ac ulterius idem Attornatus dicti

domini Regis nunc Generalis pro eodem domino Rege dat curiam hic

intelligi et informari quod prædicti Nathaniel Thompson, Willielmus

Payne, et Johannes Farwell in ulteriorem prosecutionem prædictæ

falsæ nequissimæ et malitiosæ machinationis et intentionis suarum

prædictarum postea scilicet septimo die Marcii anno regni dicti

domini Regis nunc tricesimo quarto supradicto apud parochiam

Sanctæ Mariæ le Bow Londoniæ prædictam vi et armis &c. falso,

illicite, injuste, nequiter, malitiose, scandalose, et diabolice

composuerunt, fecerunt, et imprimi causaverunt quendam alium falsum

scandalosum et defamatorium libellum intitulatum, _The Loyal

Protestant, and True Domestic Intelligence, or News both from City

and Country_, in quoquidem ultimo mentionato libello continetur

prout sequitur, _That there is not in the said letter_ (prædictum

falsum scandalosum et defamatorium libellum intitulatum A Letter

to Mr. Miles Prance, in relation to the murder of Sir Edmundbury

Godfrey præantea primo mencionatum innuendo) _the least item or

circumstance, but what will be by undeniable evidence made out to

be the truth: So the said Mr. Prance, having not as yet vouchsafed

an answer to that letter, he will speedily receive a further

letter relating to that murther; wherein the further truth will

not only be fully set forth, and other circumstances set out._

Et ulterius idem Attornatus dicti domini Regis nunc Generalis

pro eodem domino Rege dat curiam hic intelligi et informari quod

prædictus Nathaniel Thompson, Willielmus Payne, et Johannes

Farwell in ulteriorem prosecutionem prædictæ falsæ nequissimæ

et malitiosæ machinationis et intentionis suarum prædictarum

postea scilicet undecimo die Marcii anno regni dicti domini Regis

nunc tricesimo quarto supradicto apud parochiam Sanctæ Mariæ le

Bow Londoniæ prædictam vi et armis, falso, illicite, injuste,

nequiter, malitiose, scandalose, et diabolice composuerunt,

fecerunt, et imprimi causaverunt quendam alium falsum scandalosum

et defamatorium libellum intitulatum, _The Loyal Protestant and

True Domestick Intelligence, or News both from City and Country_,

in quoquidem ultimo mentionato libello inter alia continetur prout

sequitur, _Whereas Dick Janeway in this Day's Mercury, promises

an answer to the late Letter to Mr. Prance, &c. This is to give

him and all the world notice, that such an answer is impatiently

expected by the author of that letter, who questions not but to

prove every tittle of that letter to the satisfaction of all

mankind: And besides he is very desirous that the Courantier

(according to his last Pacquet of Advice from Rome) would go on,

and use his interest, to procure the Lord Mayor, Court of Aldermen

and Common Council of London, to inspect the Truth of that letter;

whereby it will appear inevitably that there is not one Papist

or popishly affected person concerned in that letter, or in the

proof of the particulars thereof; but the same (with divers other

material circumstances relating to the murther of Sir Edmundbury

Godfrey, and the fraud and blind put upon the world in relation

thereto) will be more fully, plainly and manifestly proved, without

giving ill words, or scurrilous language, or reflections to any

person that really are or supposed to be therein concerned in

any circumstance whatsoever_. Et ulterius idem Attornatus dicti

domini Regis nunc Generalis pro eodem domino Rege dat curiam hic

intelligi et informari quod prædicti Nathaniel Thompson, Willielmus

Payne et Johannes Farwell in ulteriorem prosecutionem prædictæ

falsæ nequissimæ et malitiosæ machinationis et intentionis suarum

prædictarum postea scilicet primo die Aprilis anno regni dicti

domini Regis nunc tricesimo quarto supradicto vi et armis &c.

apud parochiam Sanctæ Mariæ le Bow Londoniæ prædictam falso,

illicite, injuste, nequiter, malitiose, scandalose, et diabolice

fecerunt composuerunt, et imprimi causaverunt quendam alium falsum,

scandalosum et defamatorium libellum intitulatum, _The Loyal

Protestant, and True Domestic Intelligence, or News both from City

and Country_, in quoquidem ultimo mentionato libello inter alia

continetur prout sequitur, _Last Wednesday, Nathaniel Thompson,

(upon summons) appeared before the Lords of his Majesty's most

Honourable Privy Council, about the letters to Mr. Miles Prance,

concerning the death of Sir Edmundbury Godfrey where he justified

the matter, and produced the authors, who are ready to prove (by

undeniable and substantial witnesses, not in the least accused,

or suspected of Popery, as the malicious party do suggest) that

every tittle and iota of those letters are true._ Quodque in alia

parte ejusdem ultimo mentionati libelli inter alia continetur

prout sequitur, _Mr. Thompson and the gentlemen his friends, are

to attend the next Wednesday at Council where they do not doubt

but that Honourable Board will put them into a method to prove the

whole, or any particular which their Honours in their great wisdom

shall think convenient to be brought to the test or examination_.

Et ulterius idem Attornatus dicti domini Regis nunc Generalis

pro eodem domino Rege dat curiæ hic intelligi et informari quod

prædicti Nathaniel Thompson, Willielmus Payne, et Johannes Farwell

vicesimo tertio die Februarii anno regni dicti domini Regis nunc

tricesimo quarto supradicto diversis aliis diebus et vicibus inter

prædictum vicesimum tertium diem Februarii anno tricesimo quarto

supradicto et diem exhibitionis hujus informationis apud parochiam

Sanctæ Mariæ le Bow Londoniæ prædictam scienter, et quilibet eorum

scienter prædictos separales libellos fore falsos malitiosos et

scandalosos et seditiosos vi et armis &c. falso illicite injuste

nequiter malitiose scandalose et diabolice prædictos falsos

malitiosos scandalosos et seditiosos libellos utteraverunt,

publicaverunt et quilibet eorum utteravit et publicavit, in

contemptum legum hujus regni Angliæ manifestum, ac scandalum et

defamationem publicæ justitiæ ejusdem, in malum exemplum omnium

aliorum in tali casu delinquentium, ac contra pacem dicti domini

Regis nunc coronam et dignitatem suas &c.

266.

The Memoirs of James Lord Audley Earl of Castlehaven, his engagement

and carriage in the Wars of Ireland, from the year 1642 to the year

1651. Written by himself. London. 1680.

On August 3rd, 1682, Lord Castlehaven was summoned before the

Council, the King being present, respecting the publication of

this book, which he owned; and it was resolved that the book was

a libel against the government.[221] A copy of this publication is

preserved in the British Museum Library.

267.

The Loyal Protestant, and true Domestic Intelligence, or News both

from City and Country, No. 166, Saturday, June 10th, 1682.

For publishing this periodical a prosecution was instituted against

Nathaniel Thomson and Mary his wife. The following is a copy of the

information:--

Londonia. Memorandum quod Samuel Astry armiger Coronator et

Attornatus domini Regis in curia ipsius Regis coram ipso Rege

qui pro eodem domino Rege in hac parte sequitur in propria

persona sua venit hic in curiam dicti domini Regis coram ipso

Rege apud Westmonasterium die Lunæ proximo post tres septimanas

Sancti Michaelis isto eodem termino, et pro eodem domino Rege dat

curiæ his intelligi et informari quod Nathaniel Tompson nuper de

parochia Sancti Dunstani in Occidente Londoniæ Yeoman et Maria

Tompson uxor prædicti Nathanielis existentes personæ maledispositi

ac machinantes practicantes et intendentes pacem et communem

tranquillitatem hujus regni Angliæ perturbare et diversas personas

infra hoc regnum Angliæ in odium et contemptum dicti domini

Regis et subditorum ipsius domini Regis inducere et inferre, et

ad nequissimas machinationes practicationes et intentiones suas

prædictas perimplenda et perficienda prædicti Nathaniel Tompson

et Maria Tompson decimo die Junii anno regni domini Caroli

Secundi nunc Regis Angliæ &c. tricesimo quarto vi et armis &c.

apud parochiam prædictam infra Civitatem Londoniæ prædictam

falso, illicite, injuste, nequiter, seditiose et scandalose

imprimi causaverunt et publicaverunt et uterque eorum tunc et

ibidem imprimi causavit et publicavit quoddam falsum, malitiosum,

scandalosum, et defamatorium libellum intitulatum _The Loyal

Protestant and True Domestick Intelligence_, in quoquidem falso,

scandaloso, et defamatorio libello inter alia contenta fuerunt

hæ falsæ, scandalosæ, et defamatoriæ sententiæ in his Anglicanis

verbis et figuris sequentibus _Windsor_. _June 7, 1682. This day

the Court of Verge sate here, where the 2 Portugal Cooks came

to their tryals, and were (upon hearing the whole matter) found

guilty of poysoning Mr. Benning the Turnbroach; the Foreman of

the Jury was one Mr. White, the King's Plummer, near this place.

We cannot hear of any sentence given against them as yet Benning

excepted against a House-Jury, by reason he had formerly disobliged

some of the Servants; wherefore he thought Justice would not be

done him; they having had a prejudice against him ever since._ Et

ulterius idem Coronator et Attornatus dicti domini Regis pro eodem

domino Rege dat curiæ hic intelligi et informari quod prædicti

Nathaniel Tompson et Maria Tompson die et anno supradictis apud

parochiam prædictam infra civitatem Londoniæ prædictam scientes

prædictum falsum, scandalosum, et defamatorium libellum fore

falsum et defamatorium libellum, falso, illicite, injuste,

nequiter, malitiose, et seditiose vendiderunt, utteraverunt, et

publicaverunt, et uterque eorum vendidit, utteravit, et publicavit,

in malum exemplum omnium aliorum in tali casu delinquentium, ac

contra pacem dicti domini Regis nunc coronam et dignitatem suas

&c.[222]

The result of this prosecution does not appear. A copy of this

publication is preserved in the British Museum Library.

268.

The True Protestant Mercury: or Occurrences Foreign and Domestic. No.

149. From Wednesday, June 7, to Saturday, June 10, 1682.

For publishing this periodical a prosecution was instituted

against Thomas Snowden, printer, of the parish of St. Andrew by

the Wardrobe, and Jane Curtis, wife of Langley Curtis, of the

parish of St. Bride's, Fleet Street. The following is a copy of the

information:--

Londonia. Memorandum quod Samuel Astry Armiger Coronator et

Attornatus domini Regis in curia ipsius Regis coram ipso Rege qui

pro eodem domino Rege in hac parte sequitur in propria persona

sua venit hic in curia dicti domini Regis coram ipso Rege apud

Westmonasterium die Lunæ proximo post tres septimanas Sancti

Michaelis isto eodem termino et pro eodem domino Rege dat curiæ

hic intelligi et informari quod Thomas Snowden de parochia

Sancti Andreæ Wardrope Londoniæ Typographus et Jana Curtis uxor

Langley Curtis nuper de parochia Sanctæ Bridgettæ Londoniæ Yeoman

existentes personæ male dispositi ac machinantes practicantes

et intendentes pacem et communem tranquillitatem hujus regni

Angliæ perturbare et diversas personas infra hoc regnum Angliæ

in maximum odium contemptum et vilipendium non solum cum dicto

domino Rege, verum etiam cum aliis subditis ipsius domini Regis

inducere et inferre et ad nequissimas machinationes practicationes

et intentiones suas prædictas perimplenda et perficienda prædicti

Thomas Snowden et Jana Curtis vicesimo die Junii anno regni

domini Caroli Secundi nunc Regis Angliæ &c. tricesimo quarto vi

et armis &c. apud parochiam Sanctæ Bridgettæ Londoniæ prædictam,

falso, illicite, injuste, nequiter, seditiose et scandalose,

imprimi causaverunt et publicaverunt, et uterque eorum adtunc et

ibidem imprimi causavit et publicavit quoddam falsum malitiosum

scandalosum et defamatorium libellum intitulatum _The true

Protestant Mercury or occurrences foreign and domestic_, in

quoquidem libello inter alia contenta fuerunt hæ falsæ, fictæ, et

scandalosæ sententiæ in hiis Anglicanis verbis, _The two Portugal

Cooks mentioned in our last had their tryals on Wednesday last at

Windsor, and were found guilty of poysening Benning the Turnbroach.

The foreman of the jury was Mr. W. the King's Plummer, who lives

near Windsor, but we do not hear of any sentence given as yet

against them. But we hear that his Majesty declared before the

trial, that whosoever was found in the fault, should have no favour

showed him. The reason that he had excepted against the Jury of the

King's servants, was because he had formerly some quarrel with some

of them, and had discovered something against them, and therefore

thought they would not do him justice._ Et ulterius idem Coronator

et Attornatus dicti domini Regis pro eodem domino Rege dicit quod

prædicti Thomas Snowden et Jana Curtis dicto vicesimo die Junii

anno supradicto apud parochiam Sanctæ Bridgettæ Londoniæ prædictam

falsum et scandalosum libellum falso, illicite, injuste, nequiter

et malitiose vendiderunt utteraverunt et publicaverunt et uterque

eorum vendidit utteravit et publicavit, in malum exemplum omnium

aliorum in tali casu delinquentium, ac contra pacem dicti domini

Regis nunc coronam et dignitatem suas &c.[223]

A copy of this publication is preserved in the British Museum

Library.

269.

A second letter from a person of quality to his friend about

abhorrers and addressors, &c. 1682.

This was written by Thomas Stringer, who appears to have been

Secretary or Steward to the Earl of Shaftesbury; and for writing

the same, a prosecution was instituted against him. The following

is a copy of the indictment:--

Londonia. Juratores pro domino rege super sacramentum suum

præsentant quod Thomas Stringer nuper de Londonia generosus

machinans et intendens serenissimum dominum nostrum Carolum

Secundum Dei gratia Angliæ Scotiæ Franciæ et Hiberniæ Regem Fidei

Defensorem &c., et regimen suum in odium et infamiam inter subditos

suas inferre, et pacem et communem tranquillitatem hujus regni

Angliæ molestare et perturbare, et diversas differentias inter

eosdem subditos excitare et procurare vicesimo die Junii anno regni

dicti domini Regis nunc tricesimo quarto apud Londoniam videlicet

in parochia Sancti Botulphi extra Aldersgate in Warda de Aldersgate

Londoniæ prædicta vi et armis &c. falso seditiose et malitiose

scripsit et publicavit et scribi imprimi et publicari causavit

quendam scandalosum libellum intitulatum, _A Second letter from a

person of quality to his friend about abhorrers and addressors,

&c._ in quoquidem libello continentur hæc falsa ficta et scandalosa

verba sequentia videlicet _Tis plain these men_ (ligeos et subditos

dicti domini regis nunc innuendo) _mean and intend by this

abhorrence_ (quandam detestationem versus associationem in papiris

scriptam prætensam fore inventam inter quosdam papiros Anthonii

Comitis Shaftesbury innuendo) _and under this notion to create an

association for all the Tories to maintain a Popish Successor and

to introduce arbitrary power. And whosoever joins with or doth not

vigorously oppose such practices is guilty of these designs._ Et in

altera parte ejusdem libelli continentur hæc falsa et scandalosa

verba sequentia videlicet, _That which concerns the mercenary

forces is no more than every man's duty as much as in him lies

(which means as lawfully he may) to endeavour entirely to disband

all such mercenary forces as we have reason to believe are raised

to advance arbitrary power._ In malum et perniciosissimum exemplum

omnium aliorum in consimili casu delinquentium ac contra pacem

dicti domini regis nunc coronam et dignitatem suas &c.[224]

270.

The Addresses importing an abhorrence of an Association pretended to

have been seized in the Earl of Shaftesbury's closet, laid open and

detected. In a letter to a friend. 1682.

This was the production of Mr. Robert Ferguson, and for writing,

printing, and publishing the same he was prosecuted. The following

is a copy of the indictment:

Juratores pro domino Rege super sacramentum suum præsentant quod

Robertus Ferguson nuper de Londonia generosus, Deum præ oculis

suis non habens sed instigatione diabolica motus et seductus,

machinansque et intendens serenissimum dominum nostrum Carolum

Secundum Dei gratia Angliæ Scotiæ Franciæ et Hiberniæ Regem Fidei

Defensorem, et regimen suum in odium et infamiam inter subditos

suos inferre ac pacem et communem tranquillitatem hujus regni

Angliæ perturbare et diversas differentias inter eosdem subditos

procurare vicesimo die Junii anno regni dicti domini regis nunc

tricesimo quarto apud Londoniam videlicet in parochia Sancti

Martini Ludgate in warda de Farringdon extra Londoniam prædicta

vi et armis &c. falso seditiose et malitiose scripsit, impressit,

et publicavit et scribi, imprimi et publicari causavit quondam

scandalosum libellum intitulatum, _The Addresses importing an

abhorrence of an association pretended to have been seized in

the Earl of Shaftesbury's closet, laid open and detected. In a

letter to a friend_. In quoquidem libello continentur hæc falsa

ficta et scandalosa verba sequentia, _And as all Addresses of this

nature tend to render the King, who ought to reign in the hearts

of all his people, the Head meerly of one party and that a very

inconsiderable one if compared with the bulk of the Nation; so

they only serve to publish to all the world the distractions of

the Kingdom, and to proclaim in the face of the Sun the weakness

of the Government. What do the foreigners say upon the perusal

of our Gazets, but that either things are not managed in England

according to the Laws of the Constitution, or that his Majesty

of Great Britain reigns precariously, seeing his Ministers seek

to support the Transactions of State, by courting the applause of

a few little folk here and there through the Kingdom?_ In malum

et perniciosissimum exemplum omnium aliorum in consimili casu

delinquentium ac contra pacem dicti domini regis nunc coronam et

dignitatem suas &c.[225]

A copy of this publication is in the British Museum Library. It is

in folio and occupies four pages.

271.

An Historical and Political Discourse of the Laws and Government

of England, from the first times to the end of the reign of Queen

Elizabeth. With a vindication of the ancient way of Parliaments in

England. Collected from some manuscript notes of John Selden, Esq.;

by Nathaniel Bacon, of Gray's Inn, Esquire. London. 1682.

This is one of the reprints of the original edition of 1651. For

publishing this reprint, a prosecution was instituted against John

Starkey. The following is a copy of the indictment against him:--

Londonia. Juratores pro domino Rege super sacramentum suum

præsentant quod Johannes Starkey nuper de Londonia Stationer

machinans et intendens Serenissimum Dominum nostrum Carolum

Secundum Dei gratia Angliæ Scotiæ Franciæ et Hiberniæ Regem Fidei

Defensorem &c. supremum et naturalem Dominum suum et regimen suum

in odium infamiam et contemptum inter subditos suos inducere

et inferre ac pacem et communem tranquillitatem hujus regni

Angliæ perturbare vicesimo die Junii anno regni dicti domini

Regis nunc tricesimo quarto apud Londoniam videlicet in parochia

Sancti Dunstani in Occidente in Warda de Farringdon extra London

prædicta vi et armis &c. falso seditiose et malitiose impressit

et publicavit et imprimi et publicari causavit quendam librum

scandalosum intitulatum _The continuation of the Historicall and

Politicall Discourse of the Laws and Government of England until

the end of the Reign of Queen Elizabeth with a vindication of

the antient way of Parliaments in England_. In quo quidem libro

de et concernente præfato domino Rege nunc continentur hæc falsa

ficta et scandalosa verba sequentia videlicet, _I do easily grant

that Kings have many Occasions and Opportunities to beguile their

People, yet can they do nothing as Kings, but what of right they

ought to doe: They may call Parliaments, but neither as often or

seldome as they please, if the Statute-Laws of this Realme might

take place._ Et in altera parte ejusdem libri continentur hæc falsa

et scandalosa verba sequentia videlicet, _And though Kings may be

chiefe Commanders, yet they are not the chiefe Rulers_. In malum

et pernitiosissimum exemplum omnium aliorum in consimili casu

delinquentium ac contra pacem dicti domini regis nunc coronam et

dignitatem suas &c.[226]

Upon this indictment Starkey was outlawed, but in the first year

of Will. and Mary he brought a writ of error and the outlawry was

reversed.

272.

Mr. Hunt's postscript for rectifying some mistakes in some of the

inferiour clergy, mischievous to our government and religion. With

two Discourses about the Succession, and Bill of Exclusion. In answer

to two Books affirming the unalterable right of Succession, and the

unlawfulness of the Bill of Exclusion. London. 1682.

Thomas Hunt, Esq., of London, was prosecuted for publishing

this. The information charges that Thomas Hunt, late of London,

esquire, being a pernicious and seditious man, and contriving and

maliciously intending to disturb the peace of England, and to

create false opinions and suspicions among the king's subjects

concerning the king and his government, and to cause them to think

that the king was an abettor of Papists and most pernicious men

conspiring to procure the subversion of the government of the

kingdom and also the Protestant religion established by law, called

_plotters_, and to excite rebellious seditions and discords between

the king and his subjects, and to bring the king's government into

contempt and hatred, did in order to carry out his most wicked

and diabolical intentions, on the twentieth day of January in the

thirty fourth year of the reign of King Charles the Second, at the

parish of St. Michael Cornhill in London, unlawfully, wickedly,

maliciously, scandalously, and seditiously make, compose and write,

and cause to be printed, published and sold a certain false,

scandalous, libellous, seditious, and defamatory book intituled _Mr

Hunt's Postscript_, in which book in writing of and concerning the

Papists and the _plots_ in the same book mentioned to have been

perpetrated, among other things is contained as follows--_Nay,

as if they_ [meaning Papists] _did not fear or care to loose the

favour of their most indulgent Prince, which they have possest

since he used Papists in making his Escape at Worcester; they have

contrived these two last Plots with such Art, as to bring them

under his Majesties Observation, and represented them as things

fit for his encouragement. Sure if they were not urged with the

fears of a real guilt, and a restless Conscience of the Plot, they

would never have adventured thus to have interested the honor of

the King, and to tempt him to abandon them to the publick Justice

of the Nation: which begins to grow impatient by the delays of

it against this hellish Plot. For we have had four Parliaments

dissolved since the discovery of it, one a darling to the Crown.

The bringing into question the Dissolution of that Parliament in

the House of Peers, upon the reason of an unnatural Prorogation,

was not long before censured, and some great Lords imprisoned

therefore; proceedings so unwarrantable, that it was after thought

fit by that House to obliterate the Memory of them; soe necessary

was that Parliament then thought to the service of the Crown. The

Dissolution of that Parliament, gave us reason to fear that the

King had no more business for Parliaments. By these Dissolutions,

no publick ends that are intelligible are served, no Interest but

that of the Plot is gratified; no persons of any sort receive

their satisfaction but the Plotters, who are respited thereby from

publick Justice, and gain time to bring their Plot to effect._[227]

The result of this prosecution does not appear. A copy of the book

is preserved in the British Museum Library.

273.

The Presbyterian Paternoster; Creed, and Ten Commandments. 1681.

This is a single sheet printed on both sides. A copy is preserved

in the Library of the British Museum.

In a newspaper of the period, The True Protestant Mercury of

February 23, 1680-1, we find the following account of this

production:--"Feb. 18, 1680-1. Complaint being made to the

Bishop of London of a most vile and blasphemous pamphlet, lately

published by one Hindmarsh, a bookseller in Cornhill, intituled

_The Presbyterian's Paternoster, Creed, and Decalogue_, wherein

the sacred form of prayer taught by our Blessed Saviour to his

disciples, the Ten Commandments, written with the finger of the

Almighty, and delivered with dreadful Majesty, together with that

Brief Summary of our Holy Faith, commonly called _The Apostle's

Creed_, were most impudently depraved and profaned, and to the

horror of all pious ears, the scandal of Christianity, and

indelible shame of the Nation, turned into ridicule and impiety;

his Lordship detesting such abominations, presented the said

pamphlet to the consideration of His Majesty's most Honourable

Privy Council; and 'tis said, the said Bookseller will at the

Sessions beginning to be holden this week for London be indicted

(as he most justly deserves) for blasphemy; in the mean time all

sober men of the Church of England (for which every true Protestant

has a profound deference and respect, though dissenting from some

superfluous ceremonies, so much perhaps the more eagerly contended

for by domineering spirits, by how much the less necessary they

are) will take notice what kind of persons these are, who so

studiously make it their business to render Dissenters odious and

suspected, with those swarms of seditious libels, daily spawned by

_Th. Too. S. M._ this worthy gentleman in Cornhill, and others. And

that the authors of such pamphlets, whatever they scribble, are no

real sons of the Church of England, but a disparagement unto her,

by shrouding themselves under her mantle, being in truth, either

disguised Papists, or else mere Ruffians, debaucht rakehells and

Atheists."

Very soon afterwards at the Sessions of Peace held at Guildhall,

the Grand Jury found a true bill against Hindmarsh, Thomson the

printer and Parson Ashington the alleged writer of this "detestable

blasphemous pamphlet." To quote the forcible words of the next

number of The True Protestant Mercury--"The Secretary of Hell

that contrived this horrid piece is confessed to be one Ashington,

credibly reported to be a beneficed parson in Northamptonshire, but

non-resident; and skulking here about town to practise more freely

debauchery and do mischief. There are warrants issued forth against

him; and some say, he was once seiz'd, and by negligence suffered

to escape; at present we cannot hear that he is in custody."

Hindmarsh brought a certiorari to remove the indictment into the

King's Bench, but Mr. Justice Dolben forthwith granted a procedendo

to try it immediately; and the indictment being read, Hindmarsh

pleaded guilty, and was immediately ordered to be taken into

custody, and was afterwards bailed, "the Court resenting so justly

the heinousness of the offence, that they deferred giving sentence

till next term, resolving to do it in a public manner at the King's

Bench, all the Judges being present."[228]

On the 24th June Hindmarsh appeared in the Court of King's Bench

and moved to have his bail discharged; the Lord Chief Justice

told him he deserved to be severely punished, and asked him what

he had done to expect such a favour? His Counsel alleged, that

he had discovered the author, who had already done penance for

it. Notwithstanding which the Lord Chief Justice ordered him

to prosecute the said author at common law by the first day of

the next term, and then they would consider of discharging his

bail.[229]

The following is a copy of this curious paper.

The Presbyterian PATERNOSTER; CREED, and TEN

COMMANDMENTS.

---- ---- Manent veteris vestigia fraudis. _Virg._

The Pater Noster.

Our Father which art in Hell, magnify'd be thy name; thy Arbitrary

Kingdom come, thy Tyranical will be done in _England_ now, as it

was in _Forty One_; Give us in this our Day a holy occasion of

Rebellion; and forgive us our shew of Godliness for thy sake, as we

forgive others their holy Hypocrisy for our _good Cause_; and lead

us not into an agreement of _King_ and _Parliament_; But Deliver

us from _Monarchy_ and _Hierarchy_; and then thine shall be this

Kingdom, its Power and Glory, for ever and ever, _Amen_.

THE CREED.

[Sidenote: {**} They the only Saints

{*} Dominion is founded in Gr]

I Believe in _John Calvin_, the Father of our Religion, disposer of

{**} Heaven and {*} Earth; and in _Owen_, _Baxter_ and _Jenkins_

&c. his dear Sons our Lords, who were Conceived by the _Spirit_

of _Fanaticism_, born of _Schism_ and _Faction_, suffer'd under

the _Act of Uniformity_; were Silenced, Dead and Buried; and had

descended into Hell, but that they arose again in the year of

_Toleration_; ascended into _Tub-Pulpits_, and now sit at the

right hand of the Lord S---- from whence they are coming to judge

both the _Church_ and the _State_. I Believe in the Holy _Assembly

of Divines_, the Holy _National Synod_, the _Seperate Meetings_,

the _Act of Oblivion_, the _Resurrection from Dead Rites_, and

_Toleration Everlasting_. Amen.

_The Ten Commandments._

The same which _John Presbyter_ hath spoken in 20 Chapters of his

_Works_; saying, _I am the Lord thy God, which brought thee out of

the Land of Antichrist, out of the House of Ceremonious Bondage_.

I.

Thou shalt have no other Gods but Me.

II.

Thou shalt not make any Image, or likeness of any _Saint_ in

Heaven above, (except _S. Oliver &c._) or bow down at the Adorable

name of _Jesus_ here on Earth; nor use the Sign of the _Cross_ in

the _Waters of Baptism_; For I the Lord thy God in my Jealousie

murder'd the Father, and will visit his _Superstitious Iniquity_

upon his Children, unto the third and fourth Generation of them

that hate me; but shew Mercy unto thousands in them that love me,

and keep my Damnable and Rebellious Commandments.

III.

Thou shalt not make the _Solemn League_ and _Covenant_ vain, nor

subscribe the _Declaration;_ nor take the Oaths of _Allegiance_ and

_Supremacy_, unless (with a Jesuitical _salvo_,) to obtain places

of Honour and Power.

IV.

Remember that thou keep holy the Remembrance of Forty One. Many

years didst thou labour, yet could'st not do all that thou hadst

to do; But in _Forty One_ the Lord thy God sent thee a Sabbath of

Deliverance; Thou shalt therefore now remember to do all manner of

work that thou didst then, Thou, and thy Son, and thy Daughter, thy

Man-Servant, and thy Maid-Servant, the Brutes and Proselytes that

are within thy Conventicles; For in _Forty One_ the Lord thy God

made ENGLAND and SCOTLAND Rebellious; thou shalt therefore Bless

the year Forty One; and hallow it.

V.

Honour _Fanaticism_ thy Father, and _Schism_ thy Mother, that thy

Days may be long in the Land which the Lord thy God will once more

give thee.

VI.

Thou shalt do no Murder, but upon _Majesty_, _Episcopacy_ and

_Loyalty_.

VII.

Thou shalt not commit Adultry, save with the _Holy Sisterhood_, to

get Babes of Grace.

VIII.

Thou shalt not steal, unless by _Sequestration_, _Composition_, or

_Publick Faith_.

IX.

Thou shalt not bear False witness against a _Brother_, but may'st

swallow Perjury by a Popish Reservation for the good of Holy Cause.

X.

Thou shalt Covet nothing but _Crown-Lands_, _Bishops Lands_, and

the Estates of _Malignants_.

_POSTSCRIPT._

_Thus is our_ New Religion

_Model'd by that of_ Forty One;

_And we must root up_ Monarchy

_To stop the growth_ of Popery;

_And undermining_ Church _and_ State,

Rome's _Practices we'll Antedate_;

_The better to prevent the_ PLOT,

_Ourselves will do what they cou'd not_.

_We'll cure all fear of_ French Invasion,

_By ruining at home the Nation_.

_And since_ Petitions _do no good,

And all our Tricks are understood:

Since He who never us'd to fail,

Doth now, our little_ Matchiavel;

_We'll to the World Proclaim aloud,

The_ King _and_ Duke _thirst after_ Bloud.

Curtis, Harris, Smith and Care,

_Shall Thrice a Week the Kingdom scare_,

As if the_ Devil, Turk, _or_ Pope,

_Were just arrived in the_ Hope,

_We'll authorize Men to Rebel,

By Tales from_ Hatfield, _and from_ Hell:

_And then perswade the silly Nation,

That_ Treason _comes by_ Revelation:

_And that_ Imaginary Ghosts

_Are_ Envoys _from the Lord of_ Hosts.

_Nor will We cease, till we pull down_

Episcopacy _and the_ Crown.

Printed for _Tom Tell-troth_ at the Sign of the _Old King's Head_

in _Axe Yard in King Street, Westminster_.

274.

An Apostrophe of the Loyal Party to his Majesty. 1681.

At the Sessions for the City of London held on June 1, 1681, the

Jury made a presentment against this "seditious pamphlet, contrived

by Papists, and believed to be printed by the Popish Printer in

Fetter Lane, the design of it being to overthrow the ancient

constitution of this kingdom."[230] The Editor has not been able to

discover a copy.

275.

The Vindication of the English Roman Catholics. 1681.

On Monday October 10. 1681 a complaint was made by Justice Warcup

of this "popish invective libel" dated from Antwerp. The publisher

was had before the Council, and was to answer the same before

the King and Council, on the following Friday.[231] No further

proceedings can be found, neither can the Editor discover a copy of

the book.

276.

Smith's Protestant Intelligence; Domestic and Forein. Numb. 21. From

Thursday April 7. to Monday April 11. 1681.

For publishing this newspaper, a copy of which is preserved in

the British Museum Library, a prosecution was instituted against

Francis Smith. The information charges that Francis Smith, the

elder, late of the parish of St. Christopher, London, Yeoman,

being a pernicious and seditious man, contriving and maliciously

intending to disturb the peace and common tranquillity of this

kingdom, and to make, excite and procure discord between the King

and his subjects did, on the first day of October, in the thirty

third year of the reign of King Charles the Second, in the parish

aforesaid, falsely, unlawfully, unjustly, wickedly, seditiously and

scandalously cause to be printed, sold, uttered and published a

certain false, malicious, scandalous, and seditious libel intituled

_Smith's Protestant Intelligence, Domestick and Forein_ in which

are contained these false, malicious, and scandalous sentences

following, _April 9. Mr Everard having two Orders of Council sent

him for to attend on his Majesty at the Board Yesterday, he there

Appearing, constantly refused to give a Bond for to Prosecute

Fitzharris; but, that the Reasons that made others (whose Office

it was) to decline it, ought to make him much more shie to do it,

It was thereupon granted to him that the King's Attorney General

would prosecute. But it being insisted that he should give in his

Evidence, as the law required (if what he had discovered were

true). Everard, (as 'tis said) replied, that he would think of

that, and return his Answer after some convenient time, if he were

resolved as to some Difficulties and Quæries; viz.--Whether it was

the Opinion of that Honourable Board, that Fitzharris could be

tried elsewhere than in Parliament, and whether it were safe enough

for Mr. Everard to give his Evidence elsewhere non obstante the

Impeachment of the said Fitzharris by the Commons, especially after

the Impeachment was lodged with the Lords, and entred in their

Books, because the Lords might receive and reassume the Impeachment

in another Parliament (as in case of the Lords of the Tower) and

then the Commons might become Prosecutors themselves._[232]

277.

Del Teatro Brittanico o vero Historia dello Stato, Antico, e

Presente, Corte, Governo Spirituale, e Temporale, Leggi, Massime,

Religioni, et Euuenimenti della Grande Brettagna. By Gregorio Leti.

London. 1683.

For writing this work the author was banished the kingdom, and

seven hundred copies were seized. A copy exists in the British

Museum Library. It is in two volumes, quarto size.

278.

The Impartial Protestant Mercury, N^o 89. From Friday Feb. 24 to

Tuesday February 28. 1681/2.

At the Easter Sessions for Bristol in the year 1682 the Grand

Jury presented this and the four following publications as being

"infamous, scandalous, and seditious"; and the Court thereupon

ordered that at its rising these libels be publicly burnt by the

Beadle or Common Executioner.[233] A copy is preserved in the

British Museum Library.

279.

The Impartial Protestant Mercury, N^o 96. From Tuesday March 21 to

Friday, March 24. 1681/2.

A copy is preserved in the British Museum Library.

280.

The sad and lamentable cry of oppression and cruelty in the City of

Bristol. 1682.

The editor has not met with a copy of this work.

281.

More sad and lamentable news from Bristol. 1682.

The editor has not met with a copy of this work.

282.

The devouring informers of Bristol &c. Being an additional account

of some late proceedings of those ravenous beasts of prey, against

Dissenting Protestants. Bristol. April 22. 1682.

A copy of this tract is preserved in the British Museum Library. It

is in quarto, and contains four pages.

283.

Smith's Currant Intelligence, or an impartial account of transactions

both forraign and domestick. Published from Tuesday, March 23 to

Saturday March 27. (1680).

For publishing this newspaper, a copy of which is preserved in

the Library of the British Museum, a prosecution was instituted

against John Smith of Queen Street, in the County of Middlesex,

Printer. The information charges that the defendant being a

pernicious person, and contriving and maliciously intending to

excite discord and scandal between the King and his people and the

nobles of the kingdom, did on the twenty seventh day of March, in

the thirty second year of the reign of King Charles the Second,

in the parish of St. Giles in the Fields, Co: Midd:, publish and

cause to be published a certain false, scandalous, and malicious

libel intituled _Smith's Currant Intelligence, or an impartial

account of transactions both forraign and domestick_ containing

among other things as follows:--_The Project for carrying and

recarrying of Letters from place to place throughout all the

Cities of London and Westminster, for a penny a Letter, so often

mentioned in the Intelligences, is, as Dr. Oates says, a farther

branch of the Popish Plot; for that he is credibly informed, it is

the most dextrous Invention of Mr. Henry Nevill alias Pain, who is

notoriously known to be a great asserter of the Catholick cause,

and shrewdly suspected to be a promoter of this way of Treasonable

Correspondencies; And it is to be feared, as that good Invention of

Pipes hath wholly destroyed the Trade of Tankard Bearer, so this

silly Invention will only serve to ruine the poor Porters._[234]

284.

England's Alarm: or, a most humble declaration, address, and fervent

petition to his most Excellent Majesty Charles the Second, King of

Great Britain and Ireland; and to his most honourable and grand

Council the Parliament of England; as also to the City of London,

and the whole nation in general. Concerning the great Overtures,

Catastrophes, and Grand Occurrences about to inundate and pour in

upon us, as the Judgments of Almighty God upon Antichrist and his

adherents, and the Pride, Nauseancy, and Errour of Professors, in the

years 1680 and 1681. Written by a true lover of the true Protestant

Religion, and of his Tottering poor Native Country of England

_Johannes Philangus_.

London. Printed for Thomas Pasham, in Fleet Lane. 1679.

This book is ascribed by the compilers of the Catalogue of the

Museum Library to William Petyt; and there are several other

productions of Johannes Philangus; but it does not appear upon what

authority Petyt is considered the author. A copy is preserved in

the British Museum Library. It is in folio, and contains six pages.

For printing this work a prosecution was instituted against James

Cottrell, a printer of the parish of St. Sepulchre in London.

The information charges that he, being a pernicious person, and

contriving and maliciously intending to create discord and scandal

between the King and his people, and the nobles of the kingdom, did

on the twenty sixth day of March in the thirty second year of the

reign of King Charles the Second, at the parish of St. Sepulchre

in the City of London publish and cause to be published a false

scandalous and malicious libel intituled _England's Alarm, &c._ (as

in title), containing among other things as follows: _Remember,

England, if thou art not mad drunk with the Whores Charms how that

thy preaching Ministers are turn'd into dumb Dogs and ravening

Wolves. And they bear rule by thy means, and thou lovest to have it

so._[235]

285.

The Neck of the Quakers broken; or cut in sunder by the two-edged

sword of the Spirit which is put into my Mouth. First, in a Letter

to Edward Bourne a Quaker. Secondly, in answer to a letter to Samuel

Hooton and W. S. Thirdly, in a letter to Richard Farnsworth, Quaker.

Fourthly, in answer to a printed pamphlet of the said Richard

Farnsworth, entituled, Truth Ascended: or, The Anointed and Sealed

of the Lord defended, &c. Written by Lodowick Muggleton, one of the

two last Prophets and Witnesses unto the High and Mighty God, the Man

Christ Jesus in Glory. Amsterdam: Printed in the year of our Lord

God, 1663. And are to be had in Great Trinity Lane, over against the

Lyon and the Lamb.

The author of this book was founder of the sect called

Muggletonians. He was born in 1609, and was bred up to be a tailor.

Abandoning his trade in 1651, he set up himself and his companion

John Reeves as the "two last witnesses" mentioned in the apocalypse

as having power to prophesy, and to smite mankind with plagues.

They began to fulfil their "commission" by denouncing all religious

sects, and especially the Ranters and the Quakers. An exposition

of their doctrines, was published in "The Divine Looking-Glass."

In this work, among other wild vagaries, were propounded the

views that the Trinity are merely the three different names, and

not the three distinct persons, of one God; that God has a real

human body; and that he left Elias as his vicegerent in heaven

when he came down to the earth to die on the cross. These profane

heresies provoked much opposition. They were attacked by William

Penn, the Quaker, in a book entitled _The New Witnesses proved Old

Hereticks_. 1672.

For writing this book Muggleton was prosecuted; and was tried at

the Old Bailey on Wednesday, the 17th of January, 1676/7; he was

found guilty, and sentenced by the Court to stand three days in

the Pillory, one day in Cornhill near the Royal Exchange; the next

day in Fleet Street near the end of Chancery Lane; and the third

day in West Smithfield, from eleven to one o'clock each day, with

a paper over his head describing his offence in large letters,

and his books to be seized, and divided into three parts, to be

burnt before his face near the Pillory by the Common Hangman; and

besides, to be fined £500, and to continue in gaol till payment,

and afterwards for his life, unless he procured good bail, "such

as the Court should accept of, and not of his own gang, faction or

sect," for being of good behaviour. Full particulars of his trial

will be found in a little book, entituled, A true narrative of the

Proceedings at the Sessions-house in the Old Baily, at a Sessions

there held on Wednesday the 17th of January 1676/7, giving a full

account of the true tryal and sentence of Lodowick Muggleton for

blasphemous words and books. London. 1676/7.

The indictment charges that Lodowick Muggleton, late of London,

labourer, being a pernicious, blasphemous and heretical man in

his opinions, pretending and affirming that he was one of the

two last prophets of the New Testament, designing and intending

to disseminate his pernicious, blasphemous, seditious, heretical

and monstrous opinions, and to disturb the common peace and

tranquillity of this kingdom, and to deprave the true religion

rightly established and exercised within this kingdom, also to

move, make, and excite discords between the king and his subjects,

and to bring into great hatred and contempt the king and his royal

government in ecclesiastical causes, did on the thirtieth day of

August in the twenty eighth year of the reign of King Charles the

Second, at the parish of St. Giles without Cripplegate, London,

with force and arms, falsely, unlawfully, wickedly, maliciously,

scandalously, blasphemously, seditiously, schismatically, and

heretically write, cause to be printed, sold, uttered and published

a certain malicious, scandalous, blasphemous, seditious, and

heretical book intituled _The neck of the Quakers broken, &c._

(setting out full title) in which book are contained these false,

unlawful, blasphemous, seditious, schismatical, heretical, and

scandalous sentences following, viz.:--_I write these lines unto

you Edward Bourne, knowing you to be of the seed of the serpent,

and appointed to eternal damnation before you were born, though

you know it not, I do know it by your speaking evil of that

Doctrine which is declared by us the Witnesses of the Spirit, by

calling of it Deceit, Confusion, and Lies, with many more wicked

speeches against the purest Truth that ever was declared by Prophet

or Apostle, because this is the Commission of the Spirit, and

the last Witness of God on earth. Therefore for these your hard

sayings against the Doctrine of this Commission of the Spirit, in

obedience unto my Commission, I do pronounce you cursed and damned

soul and body from the presence of God, elect men and Angels, to

eternity; neither shall that light within you, nor any God deliver

you from this Curse, but according to my word it shall be upon

you, because you shall know that God hath given power unto man to

curse you to eternity, and that there is a Prophet of the Lord now

in the Land. Written by Lodowick Muggleton, one of the two last

Witnesses and Prophets unto the High and Mighty God the Man Christ

Jesus in Glory._ Vale. And in another place of the same book are

contained these false, feigned, malicious, scandalous, blasphemous,

seditious and heretical sentences following, viz.:--_Now in this

last age God hath given me power, and discerning to determine

and give judgement upon men and women according as I do discern

by their words, and I thereby also know what nature and seed

they are of, and accordingly I give judgment upon them, for I do

go by as certain a rule as the Judges of the Land do, when they

give true Judgment according to the Law. For God hath ordained me

the chief Judge in the world at this day to give sentence upon

men and women's spiritual and eternal estate what will become of

them after death. Full of this cursing I confess my mouth is, and

I do rejoice in it too, I know that God is well pleased in the

damnation of those that I have cursed, and I am wonderous well

satisfied in giving judgement upon them, according to the tenor of

my Commission; and this is that which you call swelling words._ And

in another place of the same book are contained these other false,

feigned, malicious, scandalous, blasphemous, unlawful, seditious

and heretical sentences following, viz.:--_Therefore I shall speak

a few words unto you two in particular, because you two have

committed that unpardonable sin that never will be forgiven in this

world, nor in the world to come; for you have done despite unto

the Spirit of Truth, in speaking evil of things you do not know,

for you have called the Doctrine and Declaration of the Spirit,

Blasphemy, Deceit, and Lies, with many other railing speeches,

with high impudency, from a light within you, and from the dead

letter without you, and hath presumptuously lifted up your selves

with that light within you, to speak evil of the Commission of

the Spirit, which we received from the true personal God without

us, even the Man Christ Jesus in Glory. Therefore in obedience to

my Commission, I do pronounce Samuel Hooton and W. S., for this

their Blasphemy against the Holy Spirit that sent me, cursed and

damned soules and bodies from the presence of God, elect men and

Angels, to eternity. Your light within you, nor God without you

shall deliver you from this Sentence which I have declared upon

you, because you shall know that there is a true Prophet now in

the last Age, as well as there hath been in former times. And this

Sentence shall be the mark of your Reprobation in your foreheads

to eternity, even as your great Grandfather had in his forehead,

and all the Seed of Faith that shall read this Epistle and see you,

shall see the mark of Reprobation in your foreheads, neither shall

you scrape it out, but it will be seen by the Elect as long as you

live. And when you dye, you shall pass through this first death

into the second death, and in the Resurrection you shall never

see the face of God, nor man, nor Angels, nor your own faces, to

eternity: but you shall be in utter darkness, where is weeping, and

gnashing of teeth for evermore._ To the great scandal and contempt

of the King, his Crown and Dignity, also of the religion rightly

established in this kingdom, to the bad and pernicious example of

all others in like case offending, and against the peace of the

King, his Crown and Dignity.

The indictment also further charges that--Nathaniel Powell late

of the parish of St. Clement Danes, London, yeoman, being a

pernicious, blasphemous, impious and profane person, and not

having the fear of God in his heart, but moved and seduced by

the instigation of the devil, and contriving and intending to

deprave, scandalize and vilify the true Christian Religion rightly

established and exercised within this kingdom; also to blaspheme

the wisdom, omnipotence and majesty of the Holy Trinity, and the

incarnation of our Lord Jesus Christ, and to strengthen, confirm

and ratify the aforesaid pernicious, seditious, heretical and

monstrous opinions of the said Lodowick Muggleton within the

kingdom of England, did, on the first day of April, in the thirty

third year of the reign of King Charles the Second, at the parish

of St. Clement Danes, aforesaid, say, pronounce, and publish

falsely, scandalously, maliciously, profanely, blasphemously,

and heretically these false, scandalous, profane, blasphemous,

and heretical words in the presence and hearing of divers liege

subjects of the said lord the King, viz.--_I rather believe in

Muggleton that stood on the Pillory, than in Jesus Christ, I have

power to damn and to save, and if thou_ (meaning a certain Gilbert

Soper then and there present) _art not damned I never desire to

see the face of God. I do believe in that Muggleton, that stood

on the Pillory, next to God Almighty. That Muggleton had power to

damn whom he pleased, whom he damned were damned to eternity, and

whom he saved, were saved. I have power to damn and to save, I

believe more in Muggleton than in Jesus Christ. I thank God, never

offended God in my life, I have no sin to ask God pardon for, I say

drunkenness is no sin, I have had the knowledge of my own salvation

these twelve months, I have the power of damning and saving, I damn

thee_ (meaning a certain Richard Sharpe then and there present)

_and God cannot save thy soul_. To the great scandal of the true

profession of the Christian Religion, to the manifest contempt of

the Holy Trinity, and blasphemy of the Deity of our Lord Jesus

Christ, and to the bad and most pernicious example of all others in

such case offending, and against the peace of the King his Crown

and dignity.[236]

Index Expurgatorius Anglicanus Or, a descriptive catalogue of the principal books printed or published in England, which have been suppressed, or burnt by the common hangman, or censured, or for which the authors, printers, or publishers have been prosecuted · 第 7 / 8 章