Holland and Militarism

Louis Raemakers knows his own countrymen better than we can, and this

satire at the expense of the peace at any price brigade is doubtless

well deserved. The attitude might have been pardoned two years ago,

but it is merely insane to-day. And none knows that fact better than

Holland. Like America, she is taking care of herself; indeed, no nation

has better reason to do so with a neighbour at her elbow unamenable to

reason and uncontrolled by conscience.

Historians to come, however, will argue that our blindness was

unpardonable, and our surprise and unpreparedness before the advent

of war must cast a heavy slur on the future credit of our past

diplomacy. For what could be clearer than Germany’s attitude or

brighter than the beacons which had directed and were still directing

her course? Bernhardi tells us all there is to know; Frederick the

Great established the Prussian tradition on a basis of fraud and

force; Bismarck sustained it and William II. has striven to reap the

harvest of their sowing. It has needed the united might of Europe to

prevent him from doing so. But to cry out against Teutonic principle

and practice, as though it were a thing of yesterday sprung upon us in

these wars, is absurd. Every politician worthy the name had the pages

of history open for his perusal. Frederick pointed out that alliances

in which each contracting party has different interests must never hold

good under all conditions, or represent a permanent political system.

He declared that no alliance or agreement in the world can be effective

after the bond of common and reciprocal interest is broken.

Why then marvel at the Belgian “Scrap of paper,” or any number of them?

It was a political commonplace with the German Chancellor and his

Master that oaths should be broken at the moment it became inconvenient

to keep them. Bernhardi himself says that political agreements must

always be concluded with a tacit reservation and can only hold as long

as the interests of both contracting parties are satisfied.

“La guerre,” said Mirabeau, “est l’industrie nationale de la Prusse.”

She came into existence by that industry and no other; and until

civilisation can crush that industry, peace terms with Prussia must not

depend upon her promise to fulfil them but upon our power to make her

do so. To cry “Down with militarism!” therefore is emphatically to play

the German game, and she will always support that cry in other mouths,

just as she applauds our “Free Trade” and other traditions that have

played into her hands so long.

Holland at least is alive to danger, and since the artist drew this

picture we have learned by _communiqué_ from Dutch General Headquarters

that the army is equipped in every possible respect, and able to

face the prospect of war with confidence. The nation as a whole has

supported Parliament with enthusiasm, and the preparations have been

directed and inspired by the spectacle of modern warfare and its

highest needs.

The "Land & Water" edition of Raemaekers' cartoons, volume 1 · 第 279 / 313 题