TO THE EDITORS OF THE AMERICAN ARCHITECT:

_Dear Sirs_,--Please answer through the columns of your valuable journal

the following:

I will designate A as the party for whom I drew plans, etc., B as the

owner of property adjoining, and C as the contractor for A. I drew up

plans and specifications for a 60' 0" front by 60' 0" deep building for

A, including party-wall for A and B who has 35' 0" front by 60' 0" deep

lot. I was employed to render full services, such as to draw up plans,

specifications, details and superintend the construction of said

building for A.

A wrote to me asking me whether I would allow B to use my plans and

specifications to be copied. I answered, emphatically, that not under

any circumstances would I allow it without compensation, as the plans,

etc., were my property, and were only designed for A.

A let the contract for erection and completion of the building to C, I

having made the articles of agreement for same.

In the meantime I was notified that B and C were taking sub-bids for

the erection of the 35' 0" building, all with my plans and

specifications. They were taking the sub-bids from the same parties that

were to do the work for C on the building for A. B let C build the 35'

0" building.

I notified B and C that I will collect my commission on the construction

and completion of their building, to which notices I have no reply.

The 35' 0" building was commenced at the same time as the building for

A; my plans, specifications and details were used for the building by

the same sub-contractors, etc.

The buildings are now nearly complete, and the building for B or the 85'

0" building is a portion of the building designed for A with slight

variations made by C.

I think the above to be very explicit; and now, gentlemen, I would like

to ask you for your opinion as to my compensation, and to what extent I

am entitled to it.

Yours very respectfully,

The American Architect and Building News, Vol. 27, No. 733, January 11, 1890 · 第 54 / 62 题