THE COST OF A SMALL MUSEUM.

[Illustration: Mr. A.A. Carey's

Cambridge, Mass.

_Sturgis & Brigham Archts._]

More than once we have endeavored to impress upon our readers the

importance of collections of casts and other art reproductions as

factors in popular education. It is only through these that the body of

our people can ever hope to become familiar with the great masterpieces

of European galleries, which have had so much effect upon the taste of

the people among whom they exist, and might do a similar good work in

this country were they only brought within reach. Doubtless there are

many who join us in the wish that not only every large, but every small

city might have its gallery of reproductions as well as its public

library--a gallery in which children could grow up familiar with the

noblest productions of Greece and Italy, in which the laborer could pass

some of his holiday hours, and in which the mechanic could find the

stimulus to make his own work beautiful as well as good. But the

principal reason why such collections are not more numerous is probably

that people have an exaggerated idea of their cost, and, among those who

might best afford this, there are doubts as to whether an undertaking of

the kind would be appreciated in any but the large cities.

Thanks to the liberality of Mr. W.A. Slater, the experiment has been

tried in Norwich, Conn., and the results of the first year of the Slater

Memorial Museum in attracting and holding popular interest have far

exceeded the anticipations of its founder and his advisers. As it has

been Mr. Slater's desire that the museum established by him should serve

not only to educate his townsmen, but also to stimulate others who had

the means to follow his example in other parts of the country, he has

given us permission to make public the cost of his collections, which,

we doubt not, will be a revelation to many. In August of last year we

gave a long description of the Slater Memorial Museum, not then quite

completed, from which it was evident that within the lines laid down by

Mr. Slater, by which it was determined that the collection should

contain only reproductions, and no original works, there were no

restrictions as to expense. The works selected were to be the best of

their kind, and were to be set up and arranged in the most effective

manner possible. The number of objects was to be limited only by the

size of the building.

The useful little catalogue of the casts in the Museum, prepared by Mr.

H.W. Kent, the curator, to whom we are indebted for the figures which we

shall quote, shows 124 numbers in the Greek and Roman section, and 103

in that of the Renaissance. Among these are some of the largest casts

made, such as the selection from the Pergamon reliefs, the Nike of

Samothrace and the Font of Siena. They were all made expressly for the

Museum, and imported from London, Paris, Berlin, Munich, Florence, Rome,

Naples and Athens. In addition to these, there is a complete collection

of the British Museum electrotypes of Greek coins, handsomely mounted,

and the nucleus of a collection of photographs, about 600, including the

best plates of Braun, Naya, Brogi and other celebrated photographers.

Most of the statues are mounted on revolving pedestals; two hundred and

fifty of the photographs are exhibited in individual frames, the backs

of which are movable, that the exhibition may be varied as often as

desired; and, owing to the lack of wall-space, draperies have been hung

extensively throughout the hall, the material of which is heavy raw

silk. We mention these facts only to show that economy was not a

consideration in the execution of the Museum, and believe that our

readers will be the more surprised to learn that its _gross_ cost to Mr.

Slater--excluding, of course, the building itself--was exactly

$27,112.97. Is there any city or college in the Union in which this sum

could not be raised for a similar purpose?

The cost of the building we do not give, because it would be useful as

showing how much, rather than how little, could be put into such an

edifice. It contains, besides the museum proper, the floor-space of

which amounts to about 10,000 square feet, a lecture-hall with a

seating-capacity of about 1,200, a library and four large class-rooms,

which, if the intentions of the founder are fully carried out, will be

used for practical instruction in the fine arts. Desirable as all these

rooms are in a building of the kind, the only one which seems to us

absolutely necessary is the lecture-hall. To open a gallery like this to

the public, and then leave people to float about in it aimlessly,

without a notion of its meaning or its purposes, is to do but half the

work. Either regular courses of instruction or occasional lectures upon

topics connected with the theory or history of art are necessary in

order to make the Museum anything more than a collection of curiosities

to the uninitiated, and such lectures are given during the winter at the

Slater Museum.

Of the amount just quoted, the principal item was naturally for casts.

The cost of these, including packing and transportation, but not

setting-up in the Museum, was $13,968.68, making an average of a trifle

less than $62 for each number in the catalogue. We ought to say here,

however, that an average is a dangerous guide in a matter of this kind,

owing to the enormous difference in the size and price of casts, as well

as in the distance from which they come. Obviously, too, the cost of

packing and importing a few casts would be proportionately much greater

than in a large order.

The casts once received, they must be put together, sometimes repaired

and finally set up. Pedestals must be built for the statues, wall-spaces

prepared for the reliefs. Therefore, a small force of skilled

plaster-workers and carpenters is necessary. In Norwich most of the

plaster-work was done by two men, a third being added occasionally, and

the aggregate of this item in the expenses was $1,626.75. With regard to

the carpentry, more work of this kind than would usually be necessary

was required by the fact that a number of changes had to be made in

order to adapt the hall to its use as a museum of art, its destination

not having been determined when the building itself was completed.

Consequently, some of the $4,690 paid for material and labor in this

department would form a part of the building expenses in a structure

designed especially for the purpose.

These were the principal expenses in the preparation of the Slater

Museum. On photographs about $800 have been spent thus far, the

electrotype coins cost something less than $750, and the balance of the

total quoted was made up by such incidentals as the draperies and

upholstering, photograph frames, the designer's commission and petty

expenses.

Turning now for a moment to the other side of the balance-sheet, we

shall try to answer the question, "Does it pay" to undertake a work of

this kind, except in our large and central cities? If to the founder or

founders of such an institution it be sufficient recompense for their

liberality to see their gift used, appreciated and enjoyed by people of

all classes, the brief experience of the Slater Memorial Museum answers

the question with a strong affirmative. The Museum was dedicated on

November 22 of last year. Since then it has been open regularly ten

hours a week, divided among three days, and at other times to students

and visitors from a distance. It is always free. There being no

automatic machine for registering the admissions, Mr. Kent has requested

visitors to write their names in a book provided for the purpose. The

number who do so is naturally considerably less than the total number of

visitors, particularly when the Museum is crowded, yet up to date the

books show more than 10,000 names. The average attendance per week thus

recorded, from the time of opening to July 1, was 283, the best month

being December, in which 2,163 names were entered, the poorest June,

with a total of 483. Especially gratifying has been the attendance on

holidays, which shows that the interest in the Museum is by no means

confined to those who have plenty of leisure. On Thanksgiving Day 800

names were registered, Christmas 932, New Year's 732, Decoration Day

850. For the benefit of the mill-operatives and other laborers who form

the largest portion of the population of Norwich and the adjoining

towns, to whom the Museum might do a world of good, we sincerely hope

the day is not far distant when the building may be open at least a

couple of hours each Sunday. The experience of the Boston Museum of Fine

Arts in Sunday opening has been an unqualified success, and we wish that

Norwich, as well as our own city, might profit by it. In Boston, we are

told, the average number of admissions during the Sunday hours has

reached as high as 1,000 per hour, and of these probably four-fifths are

common workmen with their families.

These facts and figures regarding the Slater Memorial Museum are

valuable only so far as they go. They show that the first problem of a

museum--to interest the public at large--has there been solved

successfully. More than that is not to be looked for yet. The ultimate

good which the institution will accomplish can be but imperfectly

manifested in one generation. It is from the children now growing up,

from their children and their children's children, that the deeper

results are to be expected. As the beginning has been made, we can

afford to wait for the rest, which will come in good time. The lesson to

be learned from it now is, that such collections are needed, that they

are appreciated not by a few but by many, and that, so far as the cost

is concerned, they are within the reach of every well-settled

community.--_New York Evening Post._

* * * * *

The American Architect and Building News, Vol. 27, No. 733, January 11, 1890 · 第 21 / 62 题