It takes a sure eye, too, to see

"The landscape winking thro' the

heat"--

or to gather this image:--

"He has a solid base of temperament;

But as the water-lily starts and slides

Upon the level in little puffs of wind,

Though anchor'd to the bottom, such

is he;"

or this:--

"Arms on which the standing muscle

sloped,

As slopes a wild brook o'er a little

stone,

Running too vehemently to break

upon it,"--

and many other gems that abound in his poems. He does not cut and

cover in a single line, so far as I have observed. Great caution

and exact knowledge underlie his most rapid and daring flights. A

lady told me that she was once walking with him in the fields, when

they came to a spring that bubbled up through shifting sands in a

very pretty manner, and Tennyson, in order to see exactly how the

spring behaved, got down on his hands and knees and peered a long

time into the water. The incident is worth repeating as showing how

intently a great poet studies nature.

Walt Whitman says he has been trying for years to find a word that

would express or suggest that evening call of the robin. How

absorbingly this poet must have studied the moonlight to hit upon

this descriptive phrase:--

"The vitreous pour of the full moon

just tinged with blue;"

how long have looked upon the carpenter at his bench to have made

this poem:--

"The tongue of his fore-plane whistles

its wild ascending lisp;"

or how lovingly listened to the nocturne of the mockingbird to have

turned it into words in "A Word out of the Sea "! Indeed, no poet

has studied American nature more closely than Whitman has, or is

more cautious in his uses of it. How easy are his descriptions!--

"Behold the daybreak!

The little light fades the immense

and diaphanous shadows!"

"The comet that came unannounced

Out of the north, flaring in

heaven."

"The fan-shaped explosion."

"The slender and jagged threads of

lightning, as sudden and fast amid

the din they chased each other

across the sky."

"Where the heifers browse--where

geese nip their food with short

jerks;

Where sundown shadows lengthen

over the limitless and lonesome

prairie;

Where herds of buffalo make a

crawling spread of the square miles

far and near;

Where the hummingbird shimmers--

where the neck of the long-lived

swan is curving and winding;

Where the laughing-gull scoots by the

shore when she laughs her near

human laugh;

Where band-neck'd partridges roost

in a ring on the ground with their

heads out."

Whitman is less local than the New England poets, and faces more to

the West. But he makes himself at home everywhere, and puts in

characteristic scenes and incidents, generally compressed into a

single line, from all trades and doings and occupations, North,

East, South, West, and identifies himself with man in all straits

and conditions on the continent. Like the old poets, he does not

dwell upon nature, except occasionally through the vistas opened up

by the great sciences, as astronomy and geology, but upon life and

movement and personality, and puts in a shred of natural history

here and there,--the "twittering redstart," the spotted hawk

swooping by, the oscillating sea-gulls, the yellow-crowned heron,

the razor-billed auk, the lone wood duck, the migrating geese,

the sharp-hoofed moose, the mockingbird "the thrush, the hermit,"

etc.,--to help locate and define his position. Everywhere in

nature Whitman finds human relations, human responsions. In entire

consistence with botany, geology, science, or what not, he endues

his very seas and woods with passion, more than the old hamadryads

or tritons. His fields, his rocks, his trees, are not dead

material, but living companions. This is doubtless one reason why

Addington Symonds, the young Hellenic scholar of England, finds him

more thoroughly Greek than any other man of modern times.

Our natural history, and indeed all phases of life in this country,

is rich in materials for the poet that have yet hardly been

touched. Many of our most familiar birds, which are inseparably

associated with one's walks and recreations in the open air, and

with the changes of the seasons, are yet awaiting their poet,--as

the high-hole, with his golden-shafted quills and loud continued

spring call; the meadowlark, with her crescent-marked breast and

long-drawn, piercing, yet tender April and May summons forming,

with that of the high-hole, one of the three or four most

characteristic field sounds of our spring; the happy goldfinch,

circling round and round in midsummer with that peculiar undulating

flight and calling PER-CHICK'-O-PEE, PER-CHICK'-O-PEE, at each

opening and shutting of the wings, or later leading her plaintive

brood among the thistle-heads by the roadside; the little indigo-

bird, facing the torrid sun of August and singing through all the

livelong summer day; the contented musical soliloquy of the vireo,

like the whistle of a boy at his work, heard through all our woods

from May to September:--

"Pretty green worm, where are you?

Dusky-winged moth, how fare you,

When wind and rain are in the tree?

Cheeryo, cheerebly, chee,

Shadow and sun one are to me.

Mosquito and gnat, beware you,

Saucy chipmunk, how dare you

Climb to my nest in the maple-tree,

And dig up the corn

At noon and at morn?

Cheeryo, cheerebly, chee."

Or the phœbe-bird, with her sweet April call and mossy nest under

the bridge or woodshed, or under the shelving rocks; or the brown

thrasher--mocking thrush--calling half furtively, half archly from

the treetop back in the bushy pastures: "Croquet, croquet, hit it,

hit it, come to me, come to me, tight it, tight it, you're out,

you're out," with many musical interludes; or the chewink, rustling

the leaves and peering under the bushes at you; or the pretty

little oven-bird, walking round and round you in the woods, or

suddenly soaring above the treetops, and uttering its wild lyrical

strain; or, farther south, the whistling redbird, with his crest

and military bearing,--these and many others should be full of

suggestion and inspiration to our poets. It is only lately that the

robin's song has been put into poetry. Nothing could be happier

than this rendering of it by a nameless singer in "A Masque of

Poets:"--

"When the willows gleam along the

brooks,

And the grass grows green in sunny

nooks,

In the sunshine and the rain

I hear the robin in the lane

Singing, 'Cheerily,

Cheer up, cheer up;

Cheerily, cheerily,

Cheer up.'

"But the snow is still

Along the walls and on the hill.

The days are cold, the nights forlorn,

For one is here and one is gone.

'Tut, tut. Cheerily,

Cheer up, cheer up;

Cheerily, cheerily,

Cheer up.'

"When spring hopes seem to wane,

I hear the joyful strain--

A song at night, a song at morn,

A lesson deep to me is borne,

Hearing, 'Cheerily,

Cheer up, cheer up;

Cheerily, cheerily,

Cheer up.' "

The poetic interpretation of nature, which has come to be a

convenient phrase, and about which the Oxford professor of poetry

has written a book, is, of course, a myth, or is to be read the

other way. It is the soul the poet interprets, not nature. There is

nothing in nature but what the beholder supplies. Does the sculptor

interpret the marble or his own ideal? Is the music in the

instrument, or in the soul of the performer? Nature is a dead clod

until you have breathed upon it with your genius. You commune with

your own soul, not with woods or waters; they furnish the

conditions, and are what you make them. Did Shelley interpret the

song of the skylark, or Keats that of the nightingale? They

interpreted their own wild, yearning hearts. The trick of the poet

is always to idealize nature,--to see it subjectively. You cannot

find what the poets find in the woods until you take the poet's

heart to the woods. He sees nature through a colored glass, sees it

truthfully, but with an indescribable charm added, the aureole of

the spirit. A tree, a cloud, a bird, a sunset, have no hidden

meaning that the art of the poet is to unlock for us. Every poet

shall interpret them differently, and interpret them rightly,

because the soul is infinite. Milton's nightingale is not

Coleridge's; Burns's daisy is not Wordsworth's; Emerson's bumblebee

is not Lowell's; nor does Turner see in nature what Tintoretto

does, nor Veronese what Correggio does. Nature is all things to all

men. "We carry within us," says Sir Thomas Browne, "the wonders we

find without." The same idea is daintily expressed in these

tripping verses of Bryant's:--

"Yet these sweet sounds of the early

season

And these fair sights of its early

days,

Are only sweet when we fondly listen,

And only fair when we fondly gaze.

"There is no glory in star or blossom,

Till looked upon by a loving eye;

There is no fragrance in April breezes,

Till breathed with joy as they

wander by;"

and in these lines of Lowell:--

"What we call Nature, all outside

ourselves,

Is but our own conceit of what we see,

Our own reaction upon what we feel."

"I find my own complexion

everywhere."

The Writings of John Burroughs — Volume 05: Pepacton · 第 20 / 60 题