A DELICATE TRIAL OF TACT.

_The other day I had lunch with an uncle with whom I wish to be on the

best of terms. I should say that he fancies himself as a judge of wine.

We went to a restaurant and he ordered champagne, which came, already

opened, in an ice-basket. When the wine was poured out he tasted it,

smacked his lips and said, "That's perfect! What a bouquet! What an

aroma!" I sipped and found it most vilely corked. I also noticed that

the waiter was grinning, and I then realized that he knew it too, and

that we had been given a bottle which someone else had rejected. What

was I to do? If I told my uncle that the wine was corked he would be

furious to have been detected in an error of judgment. If I did not

drink it he would be furious too. If I did drink it I should be sick,

and I should also be a fool in the eyes of the waiter. If nothing was

said the restaurant people would profit by their low trick. Meanwhile

uncle was sipping and beaming.--P. E. L. (Norbiton)._

Your problem is a very interesting one and we should find it easier to

answer if you had told us what you actually did. To rise suddenly,

apparently for the purpose of flinging your arms round your uncle's neck

in a spasm of affection, and at the same time to sweep from the table

the bottle and both glasses seems to us the course which possesses most

elements of tact. The circumstance that you were inspired by admiration

and love would mitigate your uncle's wrath, and a new and sound bottle

could quickly be obtained. We admit that the restaurant would remain

unpunished; but then that is a restaurant's _metier_.

Punch, or the London Charivari, Vol. 146, June 3, 1914 · 第 44 / 52 题