CUT-THROAT PARISH MAGAZINE COMPETITION.

The amazing upheaval in provincial journalism consequent on the issue of

the Little Titley Parish Magazine at one penny is the sole topic of

conversation in Dampshire, to the exclusion of Ulster, Mexico, the

scarcity of meat, and even golf. Perhaps the most remarkable and

significant outcome of this momentous change is the sudden abandonment

by the Nether Wambleton Parish Magazine of its familiar claim that its

sale amounted to an average which, if tested, would show an excess of

two to one over any other church periodical in Wessex. The Nether

Wambleton Parish Magazine in its May number contented itself with

asserting that it is the largest religious monthly in North Dampshire,

also that its average sale, if tested, would show a circulation

calculated to stagger humanity.

These assertions have led to a long and recriminatory correspondence in

the columns of _The Tittersham Observer_. The Rev. Eldred Bolster, Vicar

of Little Titley, writing in the issue of May 9th, characterises them as

grotesque and preposterous fabrications. He points out, to begin with,

that the Nether Wambleton Parish Magazine only contains eighteen pages,

of which no fewer than sixteen are provided from London and have no

reference to local matters, while the Little Titley Parish Magazine

contains twenty-four pages, of which no fewer than four are entirely

devoted to parish affairs. As regards circulation, Mr. Bolster

sarcastically observes that humanity is sometimes staggered by the

infinitely little even more than by the infinitely great, and challenges

the Vicar of Nether Wambleton to publish the net figures of the sale of

his periodical.

The challenge was promptly taken up, and in the issue of _The Tittersham

Observer_ of May 16th the Vicar of Nether Wambleton prints the following

statement of the sales of his magazine since April, 1913. The figures

are as follows:--

1913, May 54

" June 57

" July 51

" August 49

" September 52

" October 58

" November 59

" December 57

1914, January 61

" February 55

" March 59

The statement is signed by the Rev. Auriel Potts, Vicar of Nether

Wambleton, and Andrew Jobling and Septimus Wicks, sidesmen.

This evasive reply could not be expected to satisfy Mr. Bolster, who

returns to the charge in _The Tittersham Observer_ of the 23rd May. Side

by side with the sale figures of the Nether Wambleton Parish Magazine he

prints those of his own periodical, which for the same period never fell

below sixty and on the occasion of the Harvest Festival reached a total

of seventy-nine. With scathing emphasis he points out that the Nether

Wambleton figures cease with the month in which Little Titley came down

to one penny, since which the latter has gone up by leaps and bounds, no

fewer than eighty-four copies of the May number having already been

sold. Moreover, these are _net_ sales, while the Nether Wambleton

figures (for all he knows) represent gross circulation, including

copies gratuitously distributed at mothers' meetings, choir treats

and other gatherings.

It might have been thought that Mr. Potts would have withdrawn from

the controversial arena after this painful exposure, but with a

persistence worthy of a better cause he rejoins in a long and irrelevant

letter in _The Tittersham Observer_ of the 30th May. He undoubtedly

scores a point in maintaining that the Nether Wambleton Parish Magazine

is the largest in Wessex on the strength of the fact that its page is

half-an-inch longer and a quarter-of-an-inch wider than that of its

rival, but in other respects his reply can hardly be considered

convincing. For instance, he lays stress on the fact that the gigantic

gooseberry grown in his parish and chronicled in his current issue was

appreciably greater in diameter than that described in the corresponding

issue of the rival publication. He also dwells on the superior artistic

quality of the programme of the Penny Reading in his parish hall as

compared with that of the Little Titley Temperance Reed Band at their

annual concert. And, finally, with ill-timed levity, he disclaims any

intention of "bolstering up" his parish magazine by crude appeals to

democratic sentiment--an allusion to the name of the Vicar of Little

Titley which has been deeply resented by the numerous admirers of that

esteemed cleric.

The saddest feature about this painful controversy is the personal

estrangement which it has brought about between the two Vicars. Only six

months ago the Rev. Mr. Bolster presided at a meeting at which the

friends and parishioners of the Rev. Mr. Potts presented him with a

testimonial and a set of electro-plated fish-knives to commemorate the

celebration of his silver wedding. The testimonial, which was composed

by Mr. Bolster, was a document couched in terms of the most affectionate

admiration, and special reference was made to Mr. Potts's editorial

abilities and the extraordinarily high literary standard of his parish

magazine. In acknowledging the presentation Mr. Potts said that Mr.

Bolster's energy and goodwill in carrying it out had given him more

satisfaction than anything else, and when the two eminent divines were

photographed in the act of embracing on the platform there was hardly a

dry eye in the huge audience, numbering fully forty persons, who

attended the proceedings.

Illustration: THE CIRCUS OF EUROPE.

TURKEY (_to Europa, ring-mistress_). "INFIRM OF PURPOSE! GIVE ME BACK

THE WHIP."

* * * * *

Illustration: _Sympathetic Friend (to gloomy batsman, disgusted at

being given out for a catch at the wicket)._ "WOT'S WRONG, BILL? WAS IT

DAHTFUL?"

_Batsman._ "DAHTFUL! I SHOULD THINK IT WAS DAHTFUL! I COULD 'ARDLY 'EAR

IT MYSELF."

* * * * *

Punch, or the London Charivari, Vol. 146, June 3, 1914 · 第 15 / 52 题