PROPOLIS.

Propolis is a resinous gum gathered by the bees from buds of trees,

and used to close crevices about the hive. It becomes brittle and

hard in cold weather, but when warm is sticky and very tenacious. The

beekeeper finds it quite a problem to keep his hands free from propolis

when manipulating the hives in mid-summer. Some races of bees deposit

propolis much more freely than others, the Caucasians being especially

inclined to gather a great surplus of the cement and place it in lumps

about the hive. If, perchance, a mouse, beetle or other object enters

the hive which the bees are unable to remove, they frequently coat it

freely with propolis, and there it remains.

Cracks seem obnoxious to the bees, and the small spaces between the

frames are quite likely to be filled with the cement. In the production

of comb honey, the tendency of the bees to fill every crevice with

it leads to much labor on the part of the beekeeper in cleaning his

finished sections for market. This is especially true of honey left on

the hive till late in the season, as propolis is gathered in quantity

in late fall in anticipation of cold weather.

Cottonwood is thought to be one of the chief sources of propolis

wherever that well-known tree is found.

Bees gather much material from a great variety of sources. In addition

to the fresh wax gathered from plants and trees, they are often

attracted by fresh varnish or other substances from which they can get

sticky material to serve as glue.

PRUNE, see Plum.

PUMPKIN (Cucurbita pepo).

The pumpkin is a well-known gourd-like fruit, usually of deep yellow

color, that is widely cultivated as a food for stock and for pie.

There are numerous varieties of various sizes and colors. The blossoms

are large and showy and very attractive to the bees. The plants yield

an abundance of pollen as well as nectar. The honey is amber and not of

high quality, and granulates readily.

Where pumpkins are grown on a large scale for stock feed or for canning

factories, they are a valuable source of bee pasture.

PURPLE LOOSESTRIFE (Lythrum).

There are two species of lythrum frequently reported as honey plants.

The European species, =Lythrum Salicaria=, the spiked loosestrife,

has become naturalized in wet places from Nova Scotia to Delaware.

According to H. D. House, State Botanist of New York, it is common in

and around the inlets and backwaters of the Hudson River all up and

down that stream. It is also common up the Mohawk Valley, at Oneida

Lake and along the railroads westward across the State to Lake Erie. It

is a tall plant of vigorous growth, but as it confines itself largely

to wet places, it is not likely to be any more of a nuisance than the

usual coarse weeds growing in such situations. The bees work this plant

freely and occasional reports of honey from this source are received

from New York State. The honey is very dark and of strong flavor,

having a slight tobacco-like taste as it gets older.

=Lythrum alatum=, a native species, is found from Ontario and Minnesota

south to Georgia, Florida and Texas. A report from Oklahoma is to the

effect that it blooms with sweet clover, lasting till frost. The bees

work upon it from daylight till dark in either wet or dry weather.

Similar reports come from Texas. It is found on low lands in the

southwest.

It is also reported by beekeepers from New Orleans as attractive to

bees in Louisiana.

Q

QUEBEC--Honey Sources of.

In Quebec alsike and white clover furnish the principal surplus honey.

In the southern part of the province buckwheat, basswood and sweet

clover are also important. Fireweed, blueberry, goldenrod and aster are

the source of surplus honey over much of the province and willows and

maples are valuable for spring brood rearing.--F. W. L. Sladen.

QUERCUS, see Oak.

QUININE Tree, see Hop-Tree.

R

RABBIT BRUSH (Chrysothamnus nauseosus hypolluca).

Richter lists rabbit brush as yielding nectar in the vicinity of

Independence, California, from September till November. He states that

the bees work vigorously on it, but that the honey is dark, of poor

flavor and disagreeable odor, and that when the bees are evaporating it

it can be smelled all over the place.

There are seventeen different varieties of rabbit brush in the

southwestern desert from New Mexico to California and north to Utah and

Colorado. They are described as coarse plants, usually shrubby and

growing to a height of as much as six feet. They have small heads of

yellow flowers. The Navaho Indians use the heads of the various species

to dye wool yellow.--(Flora of New Mexico.)

RADISH or JOINTED CHARLOCK (Raphanus Raphanistrum).

The wild radish or jointed charlock is a troublesome weed in the fields

of eastern Canada and United States from New England to Pennsylvania.

Like many other introduced plants, it has been widely scattered with

grain seeds. It has been introduced into northwestern Iowa with oats,

where it is spreading in fields and waste places.

Sladen lists it as one of the important sources of nectar in Nova

Scotia.

RAGGED LADY, see Red Gaura.

RAGGED SAILOR, see Centaurea.

[Illustration: Fig. 116. Bloom of the tall ragweed.]

RAGWEED (Ambrosia trifida).

Figure 116 shows the blossom and leaf of the great ragweed, often

called horseweed. This is a very common roadside weed, growing to a

height of 10 or 12 feet. It is common in Quebec and Ontario, west to

Manitoba. In the United States it occurs from New England west to

Colorado and south to the Gulf. It is also found in Cuba and Mexico. It

is especially common in the rich lands of the Mississippi Valley from

Minnesota to Texas.

The ragweed does not produce nectar, but furnishes large quantities of

pollen in late summer and fall.

RAPE (Brassica napus).

Rape is a foreign plant related to the cabbage, which has been

introduced from Europe. In the United States it is chiefly grown as a

catch crop or forage for hogs and sheep and sometimes as a cover crop.

In Europe it is highly regarded as a honey plant, as the following

letter from Baron Von Berlepsch, which appeared in American Bee Journal

in April, 1874, will show:

“During the years between 1841 and 1858, that I was a practical

agriculturist, I cultivated rape, to a large extent, and can in

consequence thereof, and from knowledge otherwise gained, testify

most assuredly, that in all Germany there is no plant yielding more

honey than rape. I know of instances, occurring in my own experience,

where a very populous colony of bees, during time when rape was in

blossom, gained a weight of 20 pounds and over in one day.

“On the 10th of May, 1846, there was near me a 65-acre field in

blossom. The weather was excellent, and my strongest colony, which I

placed on a platform scale, gained that day more than 21 pounds in

weight. I know of only one other plant that can be compared with rape

as a honey-yielding plant, and that is esparet (=Sainfoin=).”

A Wisconsin beekeeper, writing in American Bee Journal the same

year stated that rape in Wisconsin is scarcely second to linden. He

described the honey as of golden color and good flavor. He further

cited the fact that rape blooms about the middle of August, when there

is little else, as a great advantage in cultivating it for its honey.

The few references to it in our literature indicate that it may be of

more value to the beekeeper than is generally recognized.

RAPHANUS, see Radish.

RASPBERRY (Rubus). Also called THIMBLEBERRY.

The wild raspberry (=Rubus occidentalis=) is a very common plant in

the woods of the Northeastern States. Mohr gives its natural range as

New England to Quebec and Ontario, Minnesota, Nebraska, Colorado and

Oregon, south to Ohio and West Virginia, and along the mountains to

Georgia.

[Illustration: Fig. 117. Wild raspberry grows in great abundance in

Ontario and other northern regions.]

There are several species of wild raspberries, and probably all are

good honey producers. Raspberry honey is produced extensively in

northern Michigan, where the plant is abundant on cut-over lands. It

blooms following the tree fruits and is usually ahead of the white

clover. In localities where it is plentiful it is a most valuable

honey plant and phenomenal yields have sometimes been reported from

this source. A good raspberry location is very desirable. Beekeepers

who chance to be near large plantations of raspberries cultivated for

market are equally fortunate. The honey is white and of a superior

quality. Figure 117 shows a luxuriant growth of wild raspberry as it is

found in many localities in Ontario.

RATTAN VINE (Berchemia scandens).

Rattan vine, or supple-Jack, is a common climbing vine in low thickets

throughout the Southern States from Virginia, Kentucky and Missouri,

south to Florida and eastern Texas. The flowers are greenish yellow,

usually appearing in June. The plant is slender and of vigorous growth,

frequently climbing high trees.

In east Texas it is one of the important sources of surplus honey.

There the plant is abundant along the streams, and is reported as

yielding honey for a long period. The author has found rattan vine

highly regarded in many sections of the South, especially in Alabama.

Scholl states that the honey is dark amber in color and used mostly for

manufacturing purposes.

RATTLE BOX or RATTLE WEED, see Loco Weed.

RATTLESNAKE-ROOT (Nabalus altissimus).

Rattlesnake root is listed by the late A. J. Cook as “which swarms with

bees all the day long,” but the author can find so few references to it

that it is probably of little importance.

RED BAY (Persea Borbonia).

Red bay, or Florida mahogany, is also known as tisswood, sweet bay and

laurel-tree. This tree should not be confused with the magnolia, which

is also called sweet bay. (See Magnolia). The alligator pear (=Persea

persea=) is a near relative, which has been introduced from Central

America and extensively cultivated for its fruit. It has run wild in

some parts of Florida.

Red bay is reported as yielding surplus honey in considerable quantity,

but of poor quality along the Gulf Coast of Texas. The honey is said to

be very dark, suitable for baking purposes. Beekeepers report that the

plant is quite dependable, but of limited range.

RED-BERRY, see Buckthorn.

RED BOX-TREE, see Eucalyptus.

[Illustration: Fig. 118. The blossoms of red-bud appear before the

leaves.]

RED-BUD (Cercis canadensis).

The red-bud, or Judas-tree (Fig. 118) is a common shrub or small tree

in the Southeastern States. It is found occasionally from western

Pennsylvania to southern Michigan, southern Iowa and Nebraska south to

western Florida and east to Texas. It grows along streams and in the

woodlands where the soil is moist and rich. In Alabama it blooms late

in February, and in southern Iowa in April. The rose-pink blossoms

appearing in early spring, before the leaves are out, make the tree

very conspicuous during the blooming period. Where the tree is abundant

it furnishes a liberal pasture for the bees for early spring brood

rearing. Blooming so early, it is rarely the source of surplus. In

the northern part of its range it often blooms with fruit trees and

dandelion, so that it is not as important as farther south.

There is another species in south Texas and Mexico which blooms in

March, the Texan red-bud (=Cercis reniformis=), and one, the western

redbud (=Cercis occidentalis=), which occurs in the mountains of

California and occasionally in Utah.

The red-bud is also known as salad-tree, or June-bud.

RED CLOVER (Trifolium pratense).

There have been so many conflicting statements regarding the question

as to whether or not the honeybee is able to secure honey from red

clover (=Trifolium pratense=) that it has seemed worth while to

investigate the subject with some care. There have been so many reports

of honey from this source, that it is desirable to learn whether the

honey did come from red clover, or whether the beekeepers have been

mistaken, and some explanation of the confusion is necessary. There is

no question but that the plant secretes nectar in abundance, but since

the corolla tubes are much longer than the tongues of the bees, they

are unable to reach it under ordinary conditions. It is a well-known

fact that plants behave very differently under different climatic

conditions, so an effort has been made to secure evidence from as many

localities as possible, and from a great variety of conditions.

In Iowa the writer has sometimes found bees working freely on red

clover in extremely dry seasons. At such times the bees were apparently

getting some nectar, although it could not be detected in the hive.

However, one year, Mr. C. H. True, of Edgewood, Iowa, had on exhibition

at the State Fair, a generous quantity of honey which he thought was

secured from red clover. It was slightly tinted with red, and had a

flavor different from white or alsike clover honey. The explanation

often given is that in dry seasons the florets are somewhat dwarfed,

and because of the shorter tube the bee is able to reach the honey. Dr.

L. H. Pammel, botanist at the Iowa College of Agriculture, has made

a special study of bees and red clover under Iowa conditions. After

having many measurements made, he has reached the conclusion that the

effect on the length of the corolla tube, as a result of drought, is

so slight that the bee would not be able to reach the nectar from this

cause. He goes on record as follows:

“I have for several years closely observed honeybees and red clover,

and from these observances I am still inclined to the opinion,

earlier expressed, that honeybees do not get nectar from the flowers

of the red clover, notwithstanding the opinion of many beekeepers in

Iowa.”--Third report Iowa State Bee Inspector.

At the 1917 Convention of the Illinois Beekeepers, Mr. Frank Bishop, of

Virden, reported that one season he secured an average of 100 pounds

per colony from red clover. According to his statement, there was

no other bloom within reach at that time. He further stated that he

visited the red clover fields, investigated the matter carefully, and

was fully satisfied that red clover was the source of the honey.

[Illustration: Fig. 119. Red clover blossoms.]

So many reports from well-known beekeepers are to be found in our

literature, that it seems worth while to quote several of them,

together with the place where the reference is to be found. Mr. Wm.

McEvoy, of Woodburn, Ontario, wrote to Gleanings in Bee Culture, page

468, 1907, as follows:

“In September, 1905, I extracted over 3,000 pounds of pure red clover

honey, after giving the bees plenty to winter on. This honey was a

light amber color, and good in flavor, and sold for the same price

as honey gathered from white clover. My bees being Italians, worked

well on the second crop of red clover, which was not injured by the

midge in my locality, in 1905, on account of the first crop being cut

early.”

Adrian Getaz, of Knoxville, Tenn., makes the following contribution to

the subject in Gleanings, page 660, 1909:

“In regard to bees gathering nectar from red clover, several opinions

have been advanced. Generally, it is supposed, that, owing to dryer

weather, the second crop has blossoms with shorter corollas, and that

the bees can reach the nectar on that account. Another theory is that

the nectar is more abundant, and fills up the corollas better, and

thus comes within reach of the bees. A German apiarist a few years

ago undertook to settle the matter, and spent a part of the summer

lying down in the clover fields to see how it was. He reported that

very few insects take the nectar through the corollas; but some kinds

cut a hole near the bottom and help themselves through it. The hole

once made, a number of insects, including bees, take advantage of it;

and if the bees do not work on the first crop, it is because there

are few hole-boring insects present.”

Here follows a brief report with nothing to indicate whether the bees

were seeking nectar or pollen:

“Last year was very dry and there was scarcely any white clover in

blossom here; but the bees went fairly wild on the red clover, and it

was the first crop, too.”--J. F. Brady, Deerfield, Minn. Gleanings,

page 149, 1911.

That the subject is not new will be found by examining the files of the

bee magazines of many years ago. Apparently, it has been a controverted

subject since beekeeping has been followed seriously in America. In the

first volume of the American Bee Journal, page 228, 1861, we find the

following:

“I noticed in August and the beginning of September, while the bees

were gathering honey from buckwheat, that they obtained pollen of

a brownish color from some source. On investigating the matter, I

found that they collected it from red clover. This somewhat surprised

me, as I had never seen them gathering honey from the red clover to

such an extent, particularly while other forage was plenty. * * * I

have also noticed that the bees visited only those heads that were

imperfect, the tubes being shorter in consequence.”

The principal interest attached to the above is the statement that

the bees visited only the imperfect blossoms. On page 9 of the same

volume is a statement somewhat similar, reported in one of the German

journals, of Italian bees getting honey from red clover, in 1858. It is

said that the season was very dry and the blossoms somewhat smaller as

a result.

In 1899, page 15, American Bee Journal, we find another report of bees

working on it in dry weather:

“My bees work more or less on it almost every year during hot and dry

weather, but it does not produce as fine honey as white clover; when

candied it is coarser grained, and has a water-soaked appearance. I

wish that my bees would let it alone, for we have plenty of white

clover when the red is in bloom.”--Fred Bechle, Poweshiek County,

Iowa.

Again, on page 27 of the same issue, Theo. Rehorst, of Fond du Lac

County, Wisconsin, reports:

“The mammoth red clover produces good honey and all our honeybees can

reach the nectar, although the corolla is far longer and deeper than

the common red clover. I never saw any honey from common red clover;

only thin, red stuff, thin as water.”

In 1903, E. E. Hasty, of Ohio, wrote, in the American Bee Journal,

that while he admitted that bees worked on red clover at times, he was

extremely doubtful about their ability to get much honey from it. The

same doubt has been expressed by numerous observers from time to time,

the usual explanation being that the bees are gathering pollen, rather

than nectar.

On page 49 of the 1903 volume of the American Bee Journal is reported

an interesting case of honeydew from red clover. Since it is the only

case of the kind found in all the literature consulted it is quoted

quite fully:

“For about ten days my bees have been bringing in honey from the

second crop of red clover. Now this is nothing remarkable, for I have

seen them doing so for more than twenty years past; but recently,

passing through a field of red clover in bloom, I stopped to watch

them, and, to my surprise, found them working, not on the blossoms,

but on the leaves. This, I confess, I had never seen before. On

closer examination I found the clover leaves covered with small plant

lice, and the under leaves covered with honeydew, very similar to

that frequently found on the leaves of the hickory, oak and other

trees, though the honey is not so dark-colored as from leaves of

trees.”

On page 839 of the American Bee Journal for 1906 is found a rather

convincing discussion of the subject of honey from red clover. It was

at a convention of the National Association, and several men of wide

reputation took part in the discussion, and testified to the fact that

they had secured surplus from red clover. Hutchinson stated that he had

secured 500 pounds from red clover at a time when there was nothing

else in bloom, and that it was a light amber or dark white color.

Messrs. Townsend, Stone, Davenport and others agreed that they had

secured red clover honey, Townsend reporting as much as 2,000 pounds

stored in two weeks’ time.

The subject is discussed at length in Bulletin No. 46 of the New

Zealand Department of Agriculture, by Isaac Hopkins, whose experience

in this connection is interesting. We quote him in part:

“In my early days of beekeeping it was a moot point whether Italian

bees worked on red clover or not. At this time I had a unique

opportunity of testing the matter thoroughly, an opportunity which

would rarely occur; therefore, I feel myself on safe ground when

dealing with Italian bees and red clover.

“For five years (1882-87), I was located on the late J. C. Firth’s

estate at Matamata, where I started large bee farms. My bees, which

were chiefly Italians, were near to thousands of acres of red clover.

* * * Now and again we saw a few here and there gathering pollen from

the blossoms, and sometimes a good deal of pollen from red clover was

brought in when, no doubt, it was scarce elsewhere.

“In order to make a thorough test, I shifted, on one occasion, a

number of strong two-story colonies to the center of a 700-acre

paddock of red clover. The first crop had been cut for hay, and the

second crop flowers were just opening. There was no ordinary bee

forage anywhere near. After the fourth day, I examined the hives and

found from the odor that came from them on removing the covers that

some nectar had been gathered from the surrounding clover. I also

observed that some clover pollen had been stored.

“There were two seasons out of the five when my bees worked more

freely on the red clover than in others. In these seasons it was

noticeable that myriads of small-sized moths flitted about the

clover, while they were rarely seen at other times. I was much

interested, and in casting about for a reason, I became satisfied,

after very many tests, that the red clover was secreting at times

much more nectar than usual, and it may have been that it reached

a higher level in the tubes on these occasions, and so came within

reach of the tongues of the bees. Be that as it may, some red clover

nectar was gathered from second crop flowers in these seasons.”

While the different observers are by no means agreed as to the reason

why the bees are able to get nectar from red clover on occasion, the

testimony is very closely agreed upon the fact that it is only from

the second crop, and in hot and dry seasons, that the bees are able

to store honey from this source. So many widely-known men come forward

with the positive statement that they have been able to secure surplus

honey from red clover, that we can hardly question the fact that honey

is sometimes stored from this plant. Whether the corollas are punctured

by other insects, the tubes are shortened by drought or the nectar

rises higher in the tube, remains to be proven.

RED GAURA (Gaura coccinea).

The red gaura, also called ragged lady, is common from Montana to

Arizona and Texas. It is much sought by the bees for both nectar and

pollen. Its nectar secretion is abundant, but it is not sufficiently

common to be important. A good stimulant.

RED GUM, see Eucalyptus.

RED-HAW, see Hawthorne.

RESEDA ODORATA, see Mignonette.

RETAMA (Parkinsonia aculeata).

Retama is a small tree common throughout southern and western Texas. It

has slender branches, bearing the yellow petaled flowers in axillary

racemes. It is frequently mentioned as a source of nectar by Texas

beekeepers. Scholl states that the bees work on it more or less

all summer. Like many Texas shrubs, it has a habit, of blooming at

irregular periods, from spring till September.

RHODE ISLAND--Honey Sources of.

The sources of honey in Rhode Island grouped in the order of their

appearance are willows, maples and other less numerous trees, which

furnish bees with the early supply of pollen and honey, so useful and

so needful in building up the bee population preparatory to the harvest

in which the beekeeper shares.

Next come the fruit blossoms, plum, peach, cherry, pear, apple,

raspberries, huckleberries and blueberries which, when the spring is

favorable, yield good crops of honey. In some places, dandelions are

an important addition to the fruit bloom, though not always opening at

the same time. In several parts of the State there are large areas of

locust. This blooms the latter part of May, and when conditions favor,

yields for about eight days a heavy water-white honey. The clovers

usually follow this, but are of consequence only under favorable

conditions of rainfall, save in a few sections where soil conditions

afford abundant moisture.

In many sections sumacs furnish the next crop, and where they are

sufficiently abundant the beekeeper may rightly look for a good crop of

a very fair honey.

In some of the more swampy and less settled sections, button

bush, clethra (sweet pepper bush) and clematis yield a white and

highly-flavored honey, that from clematis being of the very highest

quality. But the yield from these plants is irregular, in some years

being almost absent.

In some of the villages and cities the European lindens are numerous

and yield heavily. The bloom ceases toward the end of the clover

flow, though the time of flowering of different trees in the same

neighborhood varies greatly. Native linden, basswood, is now found only

in a few places. The season closes with the goldenrods and asters,

which yield a rich, aromatic honey which, though not acceptable to many

persons, commands a fancy price from others. The crop from these two

sources is not always to be depended upon, being more affected by the

weather than some of the others.--Arthur C. Miller, Bulletin, State

Board of Agriculture.

RHODODENDRON, see Azalea.

RHUS, see Sumac.

RICHARDIA, see Mexican Clover.

ROBINIA, see Locust.

ROCKBRUSH (Eysenhardtia amorphoides).

Rockbrush is a small shrub common to southern and western Texas, and

extending into Mexico. It blooms after heavy rains, several times

during the year, and yields honey in surplus quantity. It is reported

frequently throughout the region south and west of San Antonio to the

Rio Grande.

=Colubrina Texensis=, an entirely different shrub, which is common from

the Colorado River to the Rio Grande and west to New Mexico, is also

known by the name of rockbrush. It is reported as yielding both pollen

and nectar, but not as a source of surplus honey.

ROCKY MOUNTAIN BEE PLANT (Cleome integrifolia).

The Rocky Mountain bee plant, also known as stinking clover (Fig. 120),

is principally confined in its distributions to the plains region west

of the Missouri River. It is also reported from north Pacific Coast

States. While it is a dry land plant, it is occasionally reported

from Illinois, Iowa and Minnesota. Although it is occasionally seen

elsewhere, the author has not seen it in Iowa excepting on the Missouri

River bluffs, where it is plentiful in some localities. This plant

is reported as especially valuable in Colorado, where it is said to

produce considerable quantities of honey.

It is an annual with large, showy, pink or purple flowers. At one time

there was much interest in this plant on the part of eastern beekeepers

who tried to introduce it by sowing seed. At the Michigan Agricultural

College a small field was planted to ascertain whether it could be

grown profitably for honey alone. As no plant has as yet proven to

be sufficiently valuable to justify its cultivation for this purpose

exclusively, it is not surprising that the Rocky Mountain bee plant did

not prove to be an exception. It is acrid and pungent and said to be

distasteful to animals, which seldom eat it. If the plant had any value

for any purpose besides honey production, an effort to extend the area

of the distribution might succeed, but the introduction of plants that

are essentially weeds in their nature seldom meets with favor.

According to Frank Rauchfuss, the cleome is erratic in its yield. If

there is a wet spring the seeds germinate early. When this is followed

with good rains in June the plants are vigorous and spreading in their

growth and each will have many blossoms. One year he extracted an

average of 116 pounds per colony from a ten-days’ flow. The honey is

white in color, with a greenish tinge. It has a rather sickening flavor

when fresh, but improves with age. When pure it is a first quality

honey. It is rare that a good crop is secured from his source.

The plant thrives best on sandy and gravelly soils.

[Illustration: Fig. 120. Cleome, or Rocky Mountain bee plant.]

ROMAN CANDLE, see Yucca.

ROSE (Rosa).

There are many species of roses of wide distribution. They yield pollen

abundantly and are frequently valuable, in localities where they bloom

when pollen is scarce. There are numerous reports of rose honey, but in

most cases the observer has probably mistaken the object of the bees

when working on the flowers. Several competent observers credit the

Cherokee rose as a source of nectar. (See Cherokee Rose.)

“Some time ago quite a discussion was brought about by the assertion

of Gaston Bonnier, that one never saw bees upon roses, no matter how

colored or how fragrant. Dr. Miller replied that he had often seen

them upon the crimson ramblers and that they even tore the buds open.

“The magazine ‘L’Abeille de l’Aube,’ in its August number quotes the

different assertions which were made upon the subject since then in

Europe.

“Mr. Bonnier came back with the assertion that the bees were only

hunting pollen, for, according to him, there is no nectar in roses.

“Joan Ruppin, of Fountenay-Aux-Roses, saw his bees take pollen on the

roses, but never any nectar.

“A. Martinot saw the bees often on the crimson ramblers and on other

similar roses, never on the double flowers.

“Mr. Pitrat believes they find both nectar and pollen on the simple

flowers.

“Louis Rosseil, Consul of Belgium in Athens, says that in the Island

of Eubia, the bees work upon fields of roses and produce a white

honey much esteemed.”--American Bee Journal, October, 1912.

Beekeepers in the Rocky Mountains of Colorado and on the Pacific Coast

report that their bees get honey from roses.

ROSIN WEED, see Cup Plant, also Gum Weed.

ROYAL PALM, see Palm.

RUBUS, see Raspberry.

RUDBECKIA, see Coneflower.

RUSSIAN OLIVE, see Oleaster.

S

SABAL, see Palmetto.

SAGE (Salvia).

When sage is mentioned, we of the east are likely to think of the

common garden sage (=Salvia officinalis=), which for at least three

centuries has been cultivated for its aromatic leaves. Of this there

are several varieties, some with broad and some with narrow leaves. The

garden sages are good honey plants, but seldom sufficiently abundant to

amount to much as honey producers. The honey from the garden sage is

said to be nice and white like that from catnip or motherwort.

The name sage is derived from its supposed power to make people wise by

strengthening the memory, for which it was used in ancient medicine.

There are upwards of five hundred species of sages, widely distributed

in the temperate and warmer regions of both hemispheres. Probably most

of the species yield honey, although but few are known to be important.

Rayment mentions the wild sage (=Salvia verbenacea=) as introduced into

Australia from Europe, but now yielding honey during the dry months

of the year. (Money in bees in Australasia.) There are more than two

hundred species known to occur in Mexico and Central America and it is

very probable that when beekeeping is developed on a commercial scale

in those countries, the sages will be found to be very important honey

plants.

[Illustration: Fig. 121. White sage is uncertain in its yield.]

Since practically all sage honey that goes to market in America is from

California, the sages from that State are of first importance. Sage is

known to occur in other Western States and the question is sometimes

asked whether any honey is secured from this source elsewhere. In

answer to this question Mr. J. E. Miller, of Caldwell, Idaho, writes,

in Gleanings in Bee Culture (September 15, 1908), as follows:

“My neighbor, Mr. Garfield, experimented with one colony of bees by

taking it eight or nine miles away from alfalfa or other cultivated

fields, and setting it among the white sage. He went out to look

after it every week and took fresh water. We do not know the exact

amount of honey the bees gathered, but they did fully as well

as those left at home near the alfalfa. The honey was of that

water-white color peculiar to California sage honey. Mr. Garfield

sent samples to California and it was pronounced A-1 white sage; so

we are convinced that the white sage of Idaho does yield just as much

and just as good honey as that of any other State.”

It is probable that one or more species of sage occur in nearly every

State, but they increase in abundance westward. In the arid country

west of the Missouri River they become sufficiently common so that an

appreciable amount of honey might be expected in many localities. It is

quite likely that sage honey in small amounts is mixed with honey from

other sources, and so not detected, in many many localities outside of

California. The fact remains, nevertheless, that sage, as an important

source of surplus, is not reported outside of that State.

The quality of sage honey is of the best, being water-white in color,

of a heavy body and delightful flavor. Since it does not granulate, it

is much sought for by bottlers in the east, who blend it with clover

or alfalfa. There are many who regard sage honey as the finest in the

market. In this connection A. I. Root, in an early edition of his A B C

of Bee Culture, wrote:

“I well remember the first taste I had of the mountain sage honey.

Mr. Langstroth was visiting me at the time, and his exclamations were

much like my own, only that he declared that it was almost identical

in flavor with the famed honey of Hymettus, of which he had received

a sample some years ago. Well, this honey of Hymettus, which has been

celebrated both in prose and poetry for ages past, was gathered from

the mountain thyme, and the botany tells us that thyme and sage are

closely related.”

Although there are several species of sage which yield honey in

California, the quality does not differ materially, as far as can be

ascertained from printed reports. It is all described as “water-white,

unexcelled flavor, of heavy body and does not granulate.”

Prof. A. J. Cook wrote to the American Bee Journal (June 21, 1906)

concerning the sage as follows:

“Chief among the honey-bearing mints are the incomparable sages of

California. These are not excelled even by the clovers or linden. The

honey is white, delicate of flavor, and must ever rank among the best

in appearance and quality. Not only this, but the quantity is often

phenomenal. This comes from the fact that flowers are borne in long

racemes of compact heads, and as the separated flowerets do not bloom

all at once, but in succession, the plants are in bloom for weeks.

The sages, then, are marvelous honey producers, first, because of the

generous secretions of each flowerlet, and second, because of the

immense number of these flowerlets and the long period of bloom.”

[Illustration: Fig. 122. Black sage is the finest honey plant on the

Pacific Coast.]

At another time Mr. Cook wrote that the honey from all sages is so much

alike that it would be indistinguishable.--American Bee Journal, August

3, 1905.

Richter, in his Honey Plants of California, speaks of the white sage

(=Salvia apiana=) Jep., as “very common on the dry plains toward the

foothills, and ascending these to about 3,000 feet.” (Fig. 121).

Writing in Gleanings in Bee Culture, P. C. Chadwick describes a journey

which he made in the San Bernardino Mountains with the intent to find

out the highest elevation at which bloom could be found in sufficient

quantities to support bees. Up to an elevation of 7,000 feet he found

white sage in abundance, and all alive with bees. (Western Honey Bee,

September, 1914.) Richter gives its range as common from Santa Barbara

County southward, blooming from April to July. “As abundant as the

black sage, but not as good a yielder, nor has the honey as fine a

flavor.”

Black sage (=Salvia mellifera=), Greene, also known as ball sage, or

button sage (Fig. 122), is generally credited as being the principal

source of sage honey, most of the honey which goes to market under the

name of white sage being produced from this plant. Quite probably it

is the best honey plant on the Pacific Coast. Richter says of it: “As

a general rule, every fifth year an excellent crop is obtained, and

every third or fourth year a total failure is experienced, the flow

being dependent upon winter rains, with warm spring quite free from

cold winds and fog. When in bloom a certain amount of warm weather is

required before it produces nectar.”

The range of black sage is given as “Mt. Diablo, Los Trampas Ridge,

near Hayward, San Mateo County, Glenwood and Brieta, southward to

southern California. April-May.” (Jepson). “Coast ranges and ascending

to 5,000 feet in the San Bernardino Mountains. March to June. San Diego

County, February to May.”

Mr. J. E. Pleasants, of Orange, California, writing in American Bee

Journal (June, 1914) describes the peculiarities of the sages as

follows:

“The black sage is king of them all. When climatic conditions are

favorable I think black sage can be relied upon to produce more ‘gilt

edge’ than any other plant in the West, and for body and flavor it

is hard to excel. It blooms for weeks. The blossom is small and

inconspicuous, but what a flow of nectar it can yield.

“The white sage is a much prettier plant. Its soft, grey leaves and

tall blossom spikes make it quite showy, while its pleasing aromatic

odor breathes the very essence of wild perfumes. But this queenly

plant is much more inconstant than its plainer sister. Some years it

produces a good harvest, others very light.

“The silver or purple sage, which has silvery leaves and brilliant

light purple blossoms, is usually a good producer, but is much

restricted as to locality.”

The purple sage (=Salvia leucophylla=) (Fig. 123), also called

white-leaved sage, or silver sage, is reported as a good yielder,

although not as abundant as either of the foregoing species. The

Richter catalog gives the range as occasional in the foothills of the

Santa Monica and San Fernando Mountains, April to July, and from San

Luis Obispo to San Diego Counties and not extending inland beyond the

coast ranges.

[Illustration: Fig. 123. The purple sage.]

=Salvia amabilis=, loving sage, is reported from Santa Barbara,

March-June, but probably not important.

=Salvia carduacea=, thistle or annual sage. “Inner coast range valleys

and throughout the San Joaquin Valley, southern California, June.”

(Jepson). “A well-known honey plant.” (Richter).

=Salvia columbariae=, annual sage. “Throughout the coast ranges, Sierra

Nevada and southern California, on hill and mountain slopes.” (Jepson).

=Salvia sonomensis=, Greene, creeping sage. “Montana species at middle

altitudes. Ramona Mountains west of Calistoga, Mt. Shasta, Calaveras

and Mariposa Counties, San Diego County. May.” (Jepson). “Also June,

Sierra foothills from Sierra to Inyo Counties, main source of honey in

many districts.” (Richter).

Concerning the regularity of yield from sage, Mr. P. C. Chadwick wrote

in Gleanings in Bee Culture (January 1, 1911), as follows:

“South of the Tehachapi Mountains lies practically the entire sage of

our State, notwithstanding eastern people and many of our westerners

term every form of small growth on the vast slopes of the Rocky

Mountains “sage brush.” There is no denying that the button (or

black) sage is, of all honey plants, our chief surplus producer.

Neither does it average a crop more often than every other year,

regardless of rainfall, for it seems necessary, from its semi-arid

nature, to be dried out or rested before it comes back to its prime

yielding condition. I have seen it return some surplus for three

consecutive seasons; but the middle season was not what could be

considered a crop, even after a sufficient rainfall.”

Again he writes to the same journal to the effect that the sage ranges

soon give place to other crops (Dec. 15, 1911):

“If I should predict that thirty years hence the sage ranges of

California would be almost a thing of the past there would doubtless

be criticism of my views; but I firmly believe that we shall face

such a condition, for emigration to this part of California is

increasing rapidly. Hillsides are yielding to the plow, where twenty

years ago it would have been thought almost impossible.”

Some writers give two hundred pounds per colony as a fair average in a

good sage year, so that with even one good year in three it comes well

up with the yield of many plants more constant in their production.

SAINFOIN or ESPARCET (Onobrychis sativa).

Sainfoin is grown to a limited extent in Canada, and although given

numerous trials in various parts of the United States, has not, till

the present, succeeded in establishing itself successfully. It is a

splendid forage crop, somewhat similar to alfalfa, and is an important

source of nectar in Italy and other parts of Europe.

Several years ago it was given an enthusiastic endorsement as a honey

plant for America by John Fixter, at that time apiarist at the Central

Experiment Farms at Ottawa, Canada. A test plot at the Farms proved so

attractive to the bees that it attracted much attention on the part of

eastern beekeepers. He reported that it yielded nectar in the morning

and that the bees began work upon it fully an hour before they did on

alsike or white clover. A further advantage was stated to be that the

first bloom came between fruit bloom and white clover and the later

bloom at a time when there was a dearth from other sources. On plots

side by side he reported that there would be something like a hundred

bees on the sainfoin to ten on the white clover.

In spite of the glowing accounts of its value and a general attempt to

boom the plant, it failed to succeed. It should be remembered, however,

that there was a general failure with alfalfa when first attempts were

made to grow it in America, and it would seem worthy of further trial

to see whether there are not sections better adapted to its growth.

The following article by C. P. Dadant, reprinted from the American Bee

Journal, page 790, 1904, will give some information about the value of

the plant in European countries:

“Sainfoin, otherwise called esparcet, is widely cultivated in Europe,

especially in France. Its name, “sainfoin,” is French, and literally

means “healthy hay”--sain-foin. It is a perennial, gives a splendid

hay crop, and in some sections of the European continent it is a

first-class honey-producer.

“The small province of France, formerly called “Gatinais,” is

the leading producer of sainfoin honey. According to the best

authorities, the honey of Gatinais has the reputation of being of

the whitest color and sweetest taste, and is said to be in no way

surpassed by white clover honey.

“Gaston Bonnier, the eminent professor who was President of the

International congress of beekeepers at Paris in 1900, says in his

book, the ‘Cours Complet d’Apiculture,’ that sainfoin honey is one of

the best appreciated grades. He ranks it next only to the honey of

the Alpine hills of eastern France and Switzerland.

“From immemorial times the honey crops of Gatinais have been

considered as leading in the amount of production, and this was all

credited to the sainfoin, which is grown there in immense quantities,

somewhat as alfalfa is grown in the irrigated plains of the West. It

was in Gatinais that the custom of inverting hives began, in order

to secure the largest possible quantity of honey from the bees,

regardless of future consequences. For that reason the beekeepers

of Gatinais were compelled to replenish apiaries every season with

bees brought from away, as their only aim was to secure the largest

possible quantity of sainfoin honey during the short period of the

bloom, and many of their bees perished the following winter.

“Although sainfoin has already been tried in the United States with

unfavorable results, I believe it is worth while to try it again,

especially in the countries where alfalfa succeeds so well. It might

prove a useful honey plant.

“We must, however, not close our eyes to the fact that honey plants

do not yield honey in the same proportion in all localities. White

clover, which is the source of so large a crop of white honey in this

country, is absolutely useless as a honey producer in some other

countries. Edouard Bertrand, the editor of the Revue Internationale,

told me positively that there never had been any white clover honey

harvested in Switzerland by any of his friends, although it is quite

common in the Swiss meadows.”

SALAD-TREE, see Red-Bud.

SALAL (Gaultheria shallon).

Salal is an evergreen shrub, one to five feet high, common from central

California north to Washington. It grows abundantly in the redwood

forests commonly covering the ground. The flowers occur in racemes

three to six inches long and are pink or pinkish white.

It blooms with salmon-berry, wild blackberry and chittam, so the honey

is seldom secured unmixed.

SALIX, see Willow.

SALMON BERRY or THIMBLE BERRY (Rubacer parviflorus).

The salmon berry or Thimble berry, also known as flowering raspberry,

shown at Figure 124, is a well known honey plant on the Pacific Coast.

It occurs along the coast from Alaska to Mexico. It also occurs in the

mountains as far south as Colorado and New Mexico. It is a shrub with

erect stem and red fruit. It is known to some extent in Ontario west to

Dakota.

Salmon berry is frequently mentioned as a source of honey in the

Pacific Northwest, especially in Washington, Oregon and British

Columbia.

[Illustration: Fig. 124. Salmon berry, or thimble berry.]

SALT CEDAR (Tamarix gallica).

Scholl’s Bulletin lists the salt cedar as a source of honey in Texas.

“Common European shrub which seems to have escaped in many places in

Texas.” (Coulter). “On roadsides, in thickets and waste places in

warmer parts of southern United States, naturalized from southern

Europe.” (Small.) The author has reports of this plant being common in

the vicinity of Corpus Christi, Texas. Reported also as a honey plant

in places in California.

SANDVINE, see Bluevine.

SAPINDUS, see Wild China.

SASKATCHEWAN--Honey Sources of.

The sources of nectar, in the order of their importance, are fireweed,

wolfberry, prairie flowers, alsike and white clover and Siberian

pea-tree. Willows and maples for early brood rearing are important.--F.

W. L. Sladen.

SASSAFRAS (Sassafras officinale).

Sassafras is an exceedingly well-known tree in the Southwestern States.

It is known occasionally as far north as Ontario and Massachusetts

southward to southeastern Iowa, eastern Kansas and south to the Brazos

Valley in Texas. It is a conspicuous feature of the old fields of the

southern plantations. It has spicy aromatic bark and mucilaginous

buds and leaves which many people enjoy chewing. Oil of sassafras is

distilled from the roots.

The flowers are small, yellow and inconspicuous, but are attractive to

the bees. The writer has found occasional reports of bees working on

sassafras in the Southern States. At Buffalo, Texas, it is reported as

blooming about two weeks. H. B. Parks reports that it yields well in

Missouri. The blooming period is early and short, hence its principal

value is for spring brood rearing. It was blooming with willow on March

20, 1918, in Leon County, Texas, when the author visited that section,

and the bees were apparently getting considerable nectar from sassafras

at that time.

SATUREJA, see Wild Pennyroyal.

SAW PALMETTO, see Palmetto.

American honey plants · 第 49 / 93 题