GILIA.

Jepson lists 18 species of gilia as common to California. The late

Prof. A. J. Cook, writing of gilia in the American Bee Journal stated

that all the gilias are good honey plants. He mentioned =Gilia

capitata= as the source of quantities of sky-blue pollen. He mentions

the fact that several species yield pollen of a blue color. It is

probably a source of minor importance, since it is seldom mentioned

except incidentally in the literature.

GOLDEN GLOW, see Coneflower.

GOLDEN HONEY PLANT (Actinomeris squarrosa).

The golden honey plant is common from New York to Michigan and

Nebraska, and southward to the Gulf States. This plant is closely

related to the crownbeard and is sometimes classified as a verbesina.

It grows in rich bottom lands and in the borders of woods and fields,

reaching a height of 4 to 8 feet. The yellow flowers are very

attractive to the bees and, where sufficiently common, are a valuable

source of nectar.

[Illustration: Fig. 60. _Solidago puberula._]

GOLDENROD (Solidago).

Of the eighty species of goldenrod all but three or four belong to

North America. It is one of our most widely distributed native plants.

Some species seem adapted to nearly every condition from Canada to

Mexico and from the Atlantic Coast to California. There is a wide

difference, however, in the value of the different species to the

beekeeper, and it is no easy task to get reliable information regarding

the range of conditions under which it secretes nectar abundantly, nor

is there much recorded information concerning the particular species

which are most valuable for this purpose. It is a well-known fact that

the secretion of nectar with any plant is greatly influenced by soil

and climatic conditions. Some of our most valuable honey plants have

been reported as producing no nectar when introduced into Australia.

It is very probable that when we have studied the matter carefully we

will find that the same species of goldenrod varies as much in its

nectar secretion under different conditions as we know to be the case

with alfalfa.

[Illustration: Fig. 61. _Solidago hispida._]

Lovell is of the opinion that all species of goldenrods secrete nectar

in some localities. This is quite probable, although there is very

little honey from goldenrod in Iowa from any species. Along the upper

Mississippi, in the northeastern counties, a few beekeepers report

honey from goldenrod. In other sections of Iowa beekeepers report that

they have never seen a bee on the plant. Dr. L. H. Pammel, botanist

at the State Experiment Station, reports nine species of goldenrods

common to that State. He lists =S. serotina=, =S. canadensis= and =S.

graminifolia= as furnishing some honey here. If Lovell is right about

all yielding nectar under some conditions, then all are of interest to

the beekeeper, and it remains a question of learning the conditions

under which each species develops most favorably. If all do not yield

nectar, it is important that we learn to distinguish between the

species which are valuable honey plants and those which are troublesome

weeds.

[Illustration: Fig. 62. Bushy goldenrod (_Solidago graminifolia_), a

fine honey plant in New England.]

Richter lists only two species of this plant as important in

California. The western goldenrod (=S. occidentalis=), he mentions

as common in wet places such as marshes and river banks, from August

to October, yielding an amber honey. =S. californica=, the common

goldenrod of the coast, he describes as common on dry plains and

hillsides or mountains throughout the State, from August to December.

He lists it as a fair honey plant.

Scholl reports goldenrods as common to all parts of Texas, and states

that the honey yield is good in favorable seasons when it is not too

dry. He reports a long season, from April to November, but gives no

list of the species furnishing nectar in that region.

Sladen reports finding eleven species of goldenrods about Ottawa.

He finds that individually the =canadensis= group (Fig. 64) produce

comparatively little nectar, but their great abundance makes them

important collectively.

[Illustration: Fig. 63. Tall, hairy goldenrod (_Solidago rugosa_), one

of the best for honey.]

Sladen also notes the variation of the plant under different conditions

and says that the nature of the land determines the presence and

abundance of the best species. He reports that in the wet lands of

Charlotte County, N. B., especially in the Honeydale district, they,

together with asters, furnish the principal source of nectar, and that

they are valuable generally as a source of surplus in coastal districts

of New Brunswick and Nova Scotia. The same is said of eastern Manitoba.

He places the yield at from 50 to 80 pounds per colony in localities

where the best species of goldenrod and asters abound. The honey is

usually of good quality, ranging in color in the different districts

from white to dark amber. That gathered in swampy districts is usually

bright golden. Evidently goldenrod honey is seldom stored separate from

aster in localities from which these reports are made.

[Illustration: Fig. 64. Common or Canada goldenrod (_Solidago

canadensis_).]

Mr. Sladen describes three types of locations in which the plants may

be found in Canada:

1. Open swamp or bog, where =S. uglinosa= and =S. rugosa= are found.

The former begins blooming in August, while the latter blooms until

mid-September, so that there is more than a month of flow from these

plants. Although the bogs are independent of rain during the honey

flow, fine weather and moderate warmth are necessary to a crop.

2. Sandy or gravelly barrens or plains. On the coast, as well as

inland, on such lands are found =S. puberula= (Fig. 60), while inland

are to be found in addition, =S. squarrosa= (Fig. 59) and the less

important =S. hispida= (Fig. 61). Good rains in early August, followed

by fine and warm weather, bring best results.

3. A restricted area centering in Cumberland County, Nova Scotia, in

which =S. Graminifolia= is a troublesome weed (Fig. 62.)

He further reports that the roadside goldenrods of old Ontario are not

heavy producers of honey under ordinary conditions.

[Illustration: Fig. 65. Early goldenrod (_Solidago juncea_).]

In an article on the Honey Flora of New England, which appeared in the

April, 1916, American Bee Journal, Lovell states as follows:

“If I were compelled to stake the existence of bee culture in New

England on a single genus of plants I should select the goldenrods.

There are many species, and they all yield nectar and pollen. They

begin to bloom in midsummer and continue to bloom in October. They

are very common and there are species adapted to the seashore, the

fields, the rocks and the woods. I have never known the flow of

nectar to fail, and a great quantity of heavy, yellow honey is stored

annually.”

Mr. Lovell has kindly sent me his field notes on these plants. There

is a large amount of interesting information which space will not

permit inserting here. The notes include the study of six species, all

of which produce some nectar in Maine. He describes the tall, hairy

goldenrod =S. rugosa= (Fig. 63) as the latest to blossom and the most

valuable as a honey plant. It is found in damp thickets and on moist

land. While in bloom the bees work it very diligently and the honey is

stored rapidly. The apiary is filled with a sour odor, which, in the

evening, is noticeable at a distance.

Goldenrod honey, according to him, is deep golden yellow in color,

thick and heavy, with a more decided flavor than white clover honey.

When extracted it granulates in a month or two, but the bees winter on

it perfectly.

Next in importance he places the bushy goldenrod (=S. graminifolia=)

(Fig. 62). This is common in fields, open woodlands and hedgerows. The

odor is faint, but the nectar is clearly visible in the flowers. He

reports as many as six honeybees at work at one time on a single flower

cluster. It will be noted that this is one of the species which Doctor

Pammel mentions as yielding nectar in Iowa. Sladen also cites it as

important in Canada.

Graenicher collected 135 different species of insects on this species

in Wisconsin.

The cream-colored goldenrod, sometimes called white goldenrod (=S.

bicolor=), is of special interest because of the fact that it is

the only one of the group which is not yellow in color. Although it

produces nectar, I can find no record which indicates that it is of

much importance as a honey plant anywhere. Lovell says that it is of

little value in Maine.

The early goldenrod (=S. juncea=) (Fig. 65), is the first to bloom in

Maine and is very abundant in old fields. The bees visit it freely, but

apparently do not get much honey from it.

Graenicher states that he has collected 182 different species of

insects on this plant, in Wisconsin, which indicates the presence of

considerable nectar in that locality.

American honey plants · 第 24 / 93 题