But how often did I try to be as at such times she seemed to me to be!

In a kind of metaphysical despair how often did I try to rid myself of

underlying memory! to be a rebel to the soul itself, to live in the

dry, hard moment, without fringe or atmosphere!--trailing on with me

none of the long reaches of the past! And how often has my unconscious

demand for unity kept me from realizing my deliberate desire to kill

the soul.

In the arms of other women I have attempted to deny the soul. I have

longed to live as if I had no essential memory; as if there were

no deep instinct in me to build my life of values about a central

principle. When I failed--as I always have--I have sometimes wept

bitter tears, tears falling because of my inability to break up my

own integrity. I have been with women whom I liked and admired, with

whom I wanted to have an absolute and refreshing intimacy. I have

sometimes felt that my salvation depended on being able to give myself

completely to another woman, and I have at times tried desperately to

do so, but She always stood between, invisible, silent, representing

for me the eternal principle of continuity in emotion, insisting on the

Memory-Soul, demanding, without intending to, a monogamy deeper than

that based on convention or law.

Demanding this deeper monogamy, not only without intending to, but

even without understanding the nature of monogamy when it concerns the

spirit. She made the deeper monogamy necessary for me, but she did

not understand its nature! How often did she wonder at the character

of my love for her! Her large, frank, mysterious eyes glowed with a

kind of contemplative examination. I was a curious and interesting

phenomenon--sometimes beautiful and attractive to her, sometimes

irritating and unpleasant--but always incomprehensible was the nature

of my love, perhaps the nature of Love itself!

If she had at any one moment understood this inevitable bondage of my

spirit, a bondage which was independent of any of the conventional

expressions of fidelity, a bondage bound up with my feeling about

myself and all of life, she would have understood the reason for my

jealousy.

I was jealous because she was not bound in the same deep, independent

way! independent of conventions, bound by the essential law of

the spirit. It would have been easy for me to endure what is

called infidelity had the real, unconscious infidelity not been so

transparently present. A warm friendship with another man involving

sexual relationship would have met my growing social rebelliousness,

and would have been eventually recognized by me as not inconsistent

with our relation, had that relation ever been securely established.

To see in her eyes a temperamental forgetfulness of me and a vague

imaginative hope of relationship with an impossibly charming uninjured

masculine expression of God brought me back with an indescribable pang

to my own inherent weaknesses, my lack of nervous integrity and to the

impossibility of attaining that spiritual unity in sex which to me my

relation to her had always idealistically meant.

I wonder if every lover does not clearly understand me! Am I not here

writing the autobiography of every man as concerns his love relation? I

think these memoirs are no more true of me than of any one who has felt

the full possibility of a human relation with a being of the opposite

sex.

_Chapter VIII_

Our second child, the child of her greatest pain, the child bound up

with the sensuous Italian hills, was seriously ill at this period.

Almost every moment since that time he has been struggling between

the dissolution of his being and its regeneration. The full beauty of

Her would never have been fully revealed had it not been for the full

pain of this sensitive child! He with his precarious and tremulous

marvelousness was a product of her unconscious richness. I have now

fully known the hopeless superficiality of the lover who looks to joy

as the distinctive fruit of his relation; and of him who thinks himself

nearer his childless mistress than to the mother of his children. Every

new link of the beloved with the wider life gives her greater beauty

and meaning, and the perception of her interrelation with all of Nature

lends to her original appeal a deep structural power that becomes

identified with the total love of life.

Things grew constantly more complex for us. Practical difficulties and

trying illness, my growing relations with the rebels whose philosophy

became a disturbing factor in our union, and its consequent effect on

her, these weavings and developments seemed to carry us to a point, an

infinity of moral distance from the simple sensuous honeymoon!--giving,

however, to that simple sensuousness a new exasperation and intensity.

Especially was this true with her. Her temperamental coolness at times

quite vanished in the midst of her deep woe and her growing excitement

of life. The possibility of an unknown lover and the tragedy of

childhood woke her now to an occasional amorous expression in which

she gave herself with the last, sad, wonderful giving!

And thus I reaped the painful joy as well as the pleasurable pain of

the new stirrings of her nature toward others! And as those stirrings

brought more strenuous disturbance between us, so strenuous that they

might have burst asunder the relation, the new additions, the children,

the practical difficulties, the growing, deepening relations and

experiences brought in a counteracting intimacy which prevented the

break between us.

If our relation had remained simple it might not have endured. It

could not have endured had it not developed, changed, and taken into

it the richness of the outside world. It grew to be so manifold, so

connected with all else, that the disturbances of egotistic strife

were gathered up, controlled and harmonized by the total structure of

our existences--as a sound which may be a harsh discord in a simple

harmony is a beautiful part of a more complex symphony.

At the most intense point of my absorption in the rebellious victims of

the industrial despotism of our day and in their resulting philosophy

of life, she and the two children were away for several months, leaving

me excitedly living with my new friends. It was the first time we had

been separated for more than a day or two, and in my feeling we were

not separated then, for I poured out to her in letters the emotional

meaning of my life among the social rebels. These letters were full

of an exalted excitement, of a vivid hope for an extended fruitful

liberty revivifying and regenerating society, and of a direct appeal

and challenge to her, demanding a continuance of the Great Adventure,

and exhorting her to live freely and to love me all the more!

With me this time of separation was one of mental excitement and

imaginative adventure, adventure with ideas, and with men and women.

There was no deep relation, physical or otherwise, with any woman, but

I touched and experimented and wondered and glimpsed the human and

social vistas that were opened to me. And I passed on my impulsive

suggestions to her!

And then, just before I went to her and the children again, a letter

came telling of how she had met a man who moved her in a strong,

primitive way. He had a root-like, sensual charm for her, she wrote;

there was a something in him which needed of her and made her need

of him; he was lonely and unsocial and graceless, remote and bad,

excitingly, refreshingly bad, and me she accused of being good and that

was rather stale and dull, and touched with life’s too-refined food and

not with the stimulating salt of the earth. In him was the stimulating

salt of the earth!

Again, more strongly than ever, there came in me the deep

reverberations of a nameless jealousy! How weak were my ideas when my

fundamental feelings were aroused! Nameless it was, for we have as yet

no name for a jealousy which doubts and despises itself, a jealousy

mixed with elation and approval of its cause! In the grip of the pang

I tried to justify myself. Oh, why need she reject me at every new

out-going? Why compare me unfavorably? Again came to me the old deep

wound; she had never seen me! never had liked my real self. Again the

intolerable pain of seeing that she had never really given herself to

me!

She met me at the railroad station. As she came quietly, calmly and

cordially towards me, how wonderful, how strong and self-sufficient she

seemed! A new life, which perhaps came from the sense of having a new

lover, breathed through her, and lent an enhanced vitality; and to have

the new without eliminating the old, this was a fructifying hope in

her, a hope I should have welcomed, for it was of the bone of my theory

and of my new ideal for civilization. I had the grace at any rate to

see her as wonderful. A fresh intensity of liking was added to my love,

and for weeks I devoted myself to her with a devouring passion that

knew no bounds.

It was a passion full of disturbance and moral agony. Her cool ability

to compare him with me, the new with the old, as if we stood on an

equality in her feeling, this drove me almost insane!

By nature she was beautifully, cruelly frank; and I with an idealistic

instinct for self-torture encouraged and fostered this tendency natural

to her. It was an unconscious cruelty, due to that seclusion of her

spirit which shut her from a quick, alert knowledge of the state of

feeling in the other person. I demanded from her on this occasion an

entire, detailed account of her relation with the other man, and

she, to my indescribable pain, responded with a lucid exactness which

had its fascination, too. Indeed, she never was more desirable to me

than when she seemed, through some excluding instinct for another,

infinitely remote. I might hate her, but she appeared then as a

resplendent being.

I saw from what she coolly told me that she was prepared to give him

whatever he needed or asked. Just because of her aloofness she was

capable of a rich though cool sympathy which saw him as beautiful

partly because he needed--a strong being who needed--who seemed to need

her. I felt the beauty of her attitude. To be ready always to meet a

need is beautiful. Theoretically and even emotionally I subscribed,

but why, oh, why, had she through all these long years never met

my completer need with an absoluteness which would have calmed and

controlled and rendered for me quite harmless her relations with

others?

So I felt the beauty and the limitation at once--the beauty of her

feeling for him, and the terrible emotional forgetfulness of me! How

the temperamental memory dropped out or had never been for the intenser

values of our life together! Before my fierce, uncontrolled reproaches

she scornfully called attention to my inconsistency--that made me think

and desire in one direction and passionately act in the opposite. She

cast up to me my physical relations with women and expressed with cool

completeness her temporary contempt for me. He seemed so noble in

comparison, for the lover in a much more simple relation, always has

the advantage in apparent nobility, over the husband.

And I retorted with what I think was not entire hypocrisy. Despairingly

and passionately I insisted that she had as yet shown herself incapable

of giving to others without taking from the relation with me that my

soul demanded. Never, I repeated, had I been able to forget, even for

a moment, even in the arms of another woman, my bond with her; even

when I desired to forget it, this spiritual love, stronger than death,

was unshaken; its strength was even more conscious to me at such times.

I was then more aware of it, of its indestructibility, than ever.

But with her it was different, I insisted. Had she ever loved me in

that strange, temperamental way, had she ever had that passionate

liking for my real self, independent of my qualities, she would have

been incapable of spiritual infidelity; no matter what her friendly

actions had been, no matter how technically and conventionally

unfaithful she had been, in moments of inevitable sexual movements.

Over and over again I vehemently asserted the difference between the

conventions of her sex and of mine, conventions that I hated and

wished undone and obliterated from society; but which nevertheless

existed and which were a painful element in every human relation. I

pointed out how difficult it is for a woman to give herself without

the deeper infidelity, for she is told by society that unless she

loves when she gives herself, she is evil and unworthy, abandoned; and

that that terrible and ugly convention is a corrosive reality even

to strong-minded, humorous and emancipated women. I had hoped she,

the woman I loved, could rise above this crassly physical measure of

virtue, but whenever it came to the test I had seen that when she began

to be intimate, or to think of intimacy with another man, she tended

to forget her spiritual bond with me. Was it because of this damnable

social convention, or because she had never felt that bond? Between

these alternatives I passionately vacillated, self-torturing, helpless,

morally unattractive, undignified, the ugly incarnation of an extreme

unsatisfied need!

One day she asked me, as she had asked me before, not to come home that

evening until late. She wanted to spend it alone with him. She wanted

a relation in which I could be no part, which could not be if I were

there, something excluding me! Dumb rage took possession of me, but at

the same time I longed to take the strong and independent attitude, the

attitude that might win myself for myself, that might win the greater

Her for me--the Her for me that I had never had!

So I went away and dined and spent the evening in a gathering of men

and women who lightly talked of love and freedom and society. As I

looked on these faces and heard not what they said, I wondered if they

felt as I felt, if their lives were as mine, and I knew instinctively

that they were; I knew that all lovers understand and that this book is

a universal book, that all human beings who feel at all must feel as I

feel. In my mind and senses, in my conscious self and in the clearness

of my definite thoughts, I was with her and him--not with these my

talking brothers and sisters whose faces only I saw, for their faces,

not their words, mirrored my soul. Did her being remember me? Doubt of

her and doubt of myself came with alternating violence and when I went

home I was completely exhausted.

I found her proud and silent, instinct with that torturing and amazing

recessional remoteness which was of her inner being, of the inner being

of all things. She looked at me with quiet, searching questionings, as

if she were looking deep into my nature and wondering if there were any

consistency there, anything that remained and endured, anything that

was necessary, after all that was conventional and accidental and vain

and merely respectable had passed. She was deeply serious and it was

with a certain quiet anxiety that she met me.

But her quiet passed into silent reproach as I nervously demanded talk

from her. She withdrew into that infinity of distance that I knew and

hated, and refused to answer my violent demand to tell me all that had

happened between her and him. The strong part for me to have taken was

dignified trust, an obvious confidence that the best existed between us

and was inalienable. But I did not have that trust. That confidence was

lacking in me and I was not strong and clever enough to assume it.

So she with clear disappointment was obstinately silent, and this in

spite of my growing excitement and violence. And suddenly something

happened which had never happened before and never since, although

in after years even more acute crises arose; without premeditation I

took her by the throat! I did not know I was doing it until I caught

myself in the act. Never had the possibility of using physical violence

occurred to me. In my consciousness it was incredible--but here it

happened without consciousness! The underlying brute in me terrified

me, even in the act itself! At that moment I understood murder, and

knew that assassination might become inevitable for any one at any

moment.

Terror at myself was followed by surprise at the way she took it.

She made no resistance, but in a deep quiet whisper she breathed my

name. Her eyes grew big and a profound wonder was in that silent sound

that seemed to come from all of her. I think the perception that I

was capable of absolute unreason appealed in some primitive way to

her imagination. Me she had always regarded as a finally civilized

creature, analytical, seeking reason and sophistication. The passion

which was me she had perhaps never so clearly felt. At any rate I

sensed with a kind of shameful pride that she was gazing at me as at an

interesting stranger. Not the slightest touch of fear was in her look,

but a wonderful quiet excitement dominated her.

Why was it that, in after years, when the waves of passion came on

me perhaps even more strongly, I never again resorted to physical

violence? It may be the shock to myself when I felt what I was capable

of; perhaps it was the contempt that must be ours when we use the

uttermost weapon without reserve. To lose all possible control is the

final degradation of the soul. And she, too, never again used her final

weapon--impenetrable silence to the same terrible degree. Her silence

was with her as unreasonable, as much a part of primitive instinct,

as was my violence. And she had on that occasion indulged her form of

unreasonable violence to the limit. And my violence had been born of

hers. I think at that moment a new fear of ourselves was born in each,

and that although we did not then know it we were nearer together than

ever before.

At that moment we felt the degree of savageness which each could show

the other; and the first symbolic response was a wild, fierce embrace,

mordant, painful, without limit, sad with passion, born of the new

element of recognized mutual strangeness that had been excitingly

revealed to us. And in the languid, unnervous reconciliation that

followed, the wonderful complete peace, she quietly and fully told me

what I had so fiercely needed to know; and I remember how ashamed I was

of my relief when I knew that she had been unable to give herself to

him, and at the same time of a certain vague disappointment; perhaps

because she was still finally untested and doubt of the inalienable

bond continued its periodic possession.

_Chapter IX_

Then there came three years abroad. Economic necessity was removed

to a point where we felt we could devote ourselves for a time to

contemplative work--I to those psychological studies of temperament

which were so fascinating to me, she to the forming of her experience

into stories of human life. Dwelling as we both did in our writing on

intimate nervous relations undoubtedly helped to make us more fully

conscious of our own relation: and what added still farther to this

awareness of our bond was my almost constant presence in the family.

This had and has always been so with me, with some brief interruptions.

Men who go regularly to their office and are only with their wives

and children in the evenings and on holidays do not fully taste the

domestic reality nor is made the full test of the personal relation.

My being with her and the children was irregular but frequent and

extended. All day and all night for weeks and weeks and months

and months, then in the house all day and away most of the night;

writing, she and I at the same time, I taking my share in care of the

children, in teaching them, and in the thousand details of the domestic

situation. It was a close partnership, full of variation from the

usual, interesting, irritating, and replete with meaning and color.

It was soon after the crisis that we sailed; we were both very tired

emotionally, but I think she felt as I did the charm of going off

into the unknown together. We had left nothing behind us, not even

furniture, and we were taking with us all we possessed, contained in

three trunks, with no idea of the future except the decision not to

live in hotels and pensions, but to keep house wherever we went. This

we always did, no matter how short our stay in a place; we insisted on

tasting the life as lived around us, and my domestic partnership with

her helped us to get settled as well as unsettled very quickly. That

we could bear nothing except keeping house had an inevitable meaning,

no matter how exasperating those cares were at times to both of us. We

were forced to live together in the external conditions of existence,

as in the spiritual bond: it was strong, very strong, whatever it was.

On the steamer we were, I remember, unusually quiet. But I felt in her

a new freer interest in other things. She, apparently, thought very

little of the lover she had left, but because of him she saw the casual

stranger in a warmer, more human light. Her feeling of companionship

with me seemed stronger because of the recent experience; the element

of additional strangeness added to the color of our common life,

although I often relapsed into unreasoning pathos and pain. We were on

the whole, however, calmly waiting for the future. We were on a broader

base than ever, and, resting on our temperamental oars, there was

something that whispered to us of exciting, adventurous things to come,

for which we were instinctively saving our strength. I saw but not

always with pain the fuller appreciation in her glance at other men as

they swung freely and picturesquely along the deck. And on my part was

unconsciously forming itself the resolution to attain emotional freedom

from her by deeper intimacy with other women. Whenever I felt the full

pain of my dependency on her, as I did whenever I fully realized her

indestructible aloofness from me, I had an access of hope of attaining

aloofness for myself through relations with other women--a hope,

however, that has never been realized.

Never, however, even for a moment, have I ever felt any diminution

of love for her. Indeed, as time went on and our relations grew more

complex, more serious, and at times more painful, that love has seemed

more profound, more all-embracing, and to be in a way a symbol of my

love for beauty, for Nature, for Life itself.

And now, again in Italy, came another period of wonderful pleasure in

her. In the beautiful intensity of an Italian spring and summer we

realized ourselves to the joyous full, and for a time with no element

of interwoven pain. The pleasures of the senses and of the mind,

with civilized companions gracefully and indolently living out their

unstrenuous lives, dining with them out-of-doors in the long wonderful

evenings, and combining the serious languor of passionate Italy with

the nervous charm of an epigrammatic Gallic civilization--these

pleasures were of a broader, and more intellectualized but not less

sensuous honeymoon, rendered all the more poignant by the recent

crisis, hinting always of the possibility of volcanic happenings.

Now again began to stir within her the strange unconscious life, and

she was pregnant for the third time. At the period of conception

we were reveling in a beautiful, full translation into French of

the Arabian Nights. Devoted to the sensuous unmoral charm of these

gorgeous, colorful tales we lived a life quite out of harmony with

Puritanical ideas. The sentimental and the narrowly ethical were far

away and this child was started and was born in an atmosphere of mature

sensuousness, in a complete acceptance of what is called the Pagan

point of view. The tremulous, early lyricism of young love had given

place to a rich decided determination to take in full measure the goods

the Gods provide!

She was born--this sensitive little girl--on the Arno, on the banks of

the stream that runs through Fiorenze, the Flowering City of Tuscany!

And her mother this time felt the exhilaration of child-birth, the

athletic triumph in the midst of pain, the accomplishment of the

impossible with its resultant triumph. And soon afterwards came that

full physical beauty, that springing of the blood and of the body, that

intense enhancement of color and swelling of contour which gave her

the look of a gorgeous Magdalene; more delicate in quality than Rubens

or Titian, but suggesting both, richer and more voluptuous than the

early Florentine painters, yet having the recessional purity of the

Giottesque or Siennese madonna! No virgin could equal her full beauty.

No lover could so richly love a maiden were it not for the unconscious

purpose of this ultimate fruition!

The Story of a Lover · 第 4 / 7 段