SECESSION NO PROTECTION

For none of Virginia's grievances nor those of her slaveholders

against the Abolitionists was secession a cure. Within the Union and

under the _Ægis_ of the constitution was to be found her surest

defense against all their assaults. By secession she would surrender

her interest in the territories and all claim of right to introduce

slaves therein. By secession she would forfeit all the benefits of the

Fugitive Slave Law. By secession she would lose the strong arm of the

National Government to defend her against assaults, whether by lawless

bands or the legislative enactments of hostile states. Even with

respect to servile insurrections her withdrawal from the Union would

in no way abate the danger but only lessen her power to cope with the

problem. John Brown and his band were captured by United States

soldiers and the flag of the Union carried protection to the inmates

of every lonely manor house and cabin throughout her borders, whether

menaced by the slaves themselves or the emissaries of those who

plotted against her peace. Of all these facts the Abolitionists had

the profoundest appreciation. Hence for years they advocated disunion

as a condition precedent to the attainment of their great end—the

abolition of slavery.

-----

Footnote 306:

_Stonewall Jackson_, Henderson, Vol. I, p. 122.

Virginia's Attitude Toward Slavery and Secession · 第 207 / 287 题