LAWS AGAINST FREE NEGROES

In 1833, the Legislature of Connecticut, endeavoring to prevent the

establishment of schools in that state for non-resident negroes,

enacted a law prohibiting such schools, except with the consent "of a

majority of the civil authority and also of the selectmen of the town

in which such school, &c.,"[244] is to be located. The preamble of

this act justifies its passage by declaring that the establishment of

such schools "would tend to the great increase of the colored

population of the state, and thereby to the injury of the people, &c."

The negro populations of Vermont and New Hampshire had actually

decreased in the half century between 1810 and 1860, while that of

Massachusetts had increased less than three thousand.

The biographers of William Lloyd Garrison record the fact that there

existed a—

"Spirit which everywhere at the North, either by statute or custom,

denied to a dark skin, civil, social and educational

equality,—which in Boston forbade any merchant or respectable

mechanic to take a colored apprentice; kept the colored people out

of most public conveyances; and permitted any common carrier by land

or sea, on the objections of a white passenger, to violate his

contract with 'a nigger' however cultivated or refined."[245]

The states of New York, New Jersey and Pennsylvania had by statutes

deprived free negroes of many of the privileges enjoyed in the period

immediately succeeding the Revolution. Thus, New Jersey in 1807, and

Pennsylvania in 1838, deprived them of the right of suffrage, and New

York in 1821 required of them as a prerequisite to voting a much

higher property qualification than was required of the white

citizens.[246] Professor A. B. Hart declares: "These exclusions

branded the negroes as of a different caste, even in the North, and it

was backed up by other unfriendly legislation."[247]

But it was chiefly in those free states on the same lines of latitude

as Virginia and Maryland, and in which the free negroes would

therefore be most liable to settle, that the laws obstructing or

forbidding their immigration were most pronounced.

Virginia's Attitude Toward Slavery and Secession · 第 163 / 287 题