VIRGINIA'S INDUSTRIAL STATUS, 1852

These were, want of popular educational facilities, lack of internal

improvements, and the existence of slavery.[192] The author says:

"The last and most important cause unfavorably affecting Virginia

which we shall mention is the existence of slavery within her

bounds. We have already seen the origin and progress of this

institution. As to its evils, we have nothing new to offer; they

have long been felt and acknowledged by the most sagacious minds in

our state."[193]

Bishop Meade, in a note to his history, _Old Churches, Ministers and

Families in Virginia_, published in 1857, referring to the injurious

effects of slavery upon Virginia's agricultural development, says:

"That the agriculture of Virginia has suffered in times past from the

use of slaves, we think most evident from the deserted fields,

impoverished estates and emigrating population."[194]

In 1852, the Virginia Agricultural Society was organized, having among

its membership and founders, the foremost planters and citizens of the

state. From an address issued at the time, we make the following

compilations and extracts:

After reciting that Virginia was a community of farmers—eight-tenths

of her industry being expended upon the soil, the address proceeds to

point out that out of thirty-nine millions of acres she tills only a

little over ten millions; that New York, on the other hand, with

twenty-nine and a half millions, has subdued to the plough twelve and

a quarter; while Massachusetts has reclaimed from the forests, quarry

and marsh, two and one-tenth out of her little territory of five

millions of acres; that the live stock of Virginia was worth only

$3.31 for every arable acre; the live stock of New York, $6.07; and

the live stock of Massachusetts, $4.52; that the proportion of hay for

the same quantity of land was eighty-one pounds for Virginia, six

hundred and seventy-nine pounds for New York, and six hundred and

eighty-four pounds for Massachusetts; that whilst the population of

Virginia had increased during the previous ten years in a ratio of

eleven to sixty-six, New York had increased twenty-seven to fifty-two,

and Massachusetts thirty-four to eighty-one. The address then

proceeds:

"In the above figures, carefully selected from the data of authentic

documents, we find no cause for self-gratulation, but some food for

meditation. They are not without use to those who would improve the

future by the past. They show that we have not done our part in the

bringing of land into cultivation; that notwithstanding natural

advantages which greatly exceed those of the two states drawn into

parallel with Virginia, we are yet behind them both....

"When we contemplate our field of labor and the work we have done in

it, we cannot but observe the sad contrast between capacity and

achievement. With a widespread domain, with a kindly soil, with a

climate whose sun radiates fertility and whose very dews distill

abundance, we find our inheritance so wasted that the eye aches to

behold the prospect."[195]

Henry A. Wise, in the canvass of 1856, preliminary to his election to

the office of Governor, depicted the financial and industrial

conditions then existing in Virginia.

"Commerce," said he, "has long ago spread her sails and sailed away

from you. You have not, as yet, dug more than coal enough to warm

yourselves at your own hearths; you have not yet spun more than

coarse cotton enough in the way of manufacture to clothe your own

slaves. You have no commerce, no mining, no manufactures. You have

relied alone upon the single power of agriculture—and such

agriculture! Your sedge patches outshine the sun. Your inattention

to your only source of wealth has scarred the very bosom of mother

earth."[196]

It will be observed that neither the authors of the address issued by

the Agricultural Society of Virginia, nor Governor Wise, attribute the

poverty and backwardness of Virginia to the institution of slavery.

Their statements, however, are none the less valuable as showing the

status—financial and industrial—to which Virginia had been reduced.

-----

Footnote 183:

_History of United States_, Bancroft, Vol. VI, p. 179.

Footnote 184:

_Idem_, p. 262.

Footnote 185:

_Causes of Civil War_, Chadwick, p. 35.

Footnote 186:

_Niles' Register_, Vol. XXXVI, No. 932, p. 356.

Footnote 187:

_Virginia Slavery Debate_, 1832, White, Speech of Thomas Marshall,

p. 6.

Footnote 188:

_Idem_, Speech of Charles J. Faulkner, p. 7.

Footnote 189:

_Virginia Slavery Debate_, 1832, White, Speech of Philip A. Bolling,

p. 14.

Footnote 190:

_Idem_, Speech of James McDowell, p. 18.

Footnote 191:

_The Ruffner Pamphlet._

Footnote 192:

_History of Virginia_, Howison, Vol. II, pp. 510-511.

Footnote 193:

_History of Virginia_, Howison, Vol. II, p. 517.

Footnote 194:

_Old Churches, Ministers and Families of Virginia_, Meade, Vol. I,

p. 90.

Footnote 195:

_A Journey in the Seaboard Slave States_, Olmstead, Vol. I, pp.

187-189.

Footnote 196:

_The Impending Crisis in the South_, Helper, p. 90.

Virginia's Attitude Toward Slavery and Secession · 第 131 / 287 题