OPPOSITION TO FOREIGN SLAVE TRADE

George W. Williams, the negro historian, avers that,

"Thus, by an understanding or, as Gouverneur Morris called it, 'a

bargain' between the commercial representatives of the Northern

States and the delegates of South Carolina and Georgia, and in spite

of the opposition of Maryland and Virginia, the unrestricted power

of Congress to enact Navigation Laws was conceded to the Northern

merchants; and to the Carolina rice planters, as an equivalent,

twenty years' continuance of the African slave trade."[34]

Continuing, Mr. Fiske says, "This compromise was carried against the

sturdy opposition of Virginia." George Mason spoke the sentiments of

the Mother-Commonwealth when in a speech against this provision of the

constitution, which reads like prophecy and judgment, he said:

"This infernal traffic originated in the avarice of British

merchants. The British Government constantly checked the attempts of

Virginia to put a stop to it. The present question concerns, not the

importing states alone, but the whole Union.... Maryland and

Virginia, he said, had already prohibited the importation of slaves

expressly. North Carolina had done the same in substance. All this

would be in vain if South Carolina and Georgia be at liberty to

import. The Western people are already calling out for slaves for

their new lands; and will fill that country with slaves if they can

be got through South Carolina and Georgia. Slavery discourages arts

and manufactures. The poor despise labor when performed by slaves.

They prevent the emigration of whites, who really enrich and

strengthen a country. They produce the most pernicious effect on

manners. Every master of slaves is born a petty tyrant. They bring

the judgment of Heaven on a country. As nations cannot be rewarded

or punished in the next world, they must be in this. By an

inevitable chain of causes and effects, Providence punishes National

sins by National calamities. He lamented that some of our Eastern

brethren had, from a lust of gain, embarked in this nefarious

traffic. As to the states being in possession of the right to

import, this was the case with many other rights, now to be properly

given up. He held it essential, in every point of view, that the

General Government should have power to prevent the increase of

slavery."

"But these prophetic words of George Mason," adds Mr. Fiske, "were

powerless against the combination of New England and the far

South."[35]

Some seven decades later, Virginia erected under the shadow of her

Capitol a bronze statue to commemorate the fame of this illustrious

son.

Governor Randolph and Mr. Madison earnestly supported their colleague,

the former declaring that this feature rendered the constitution so

odious as to make doubtful his ability to support it; and the latter

asserting, "Twenty years will produce all the mischief that can be

apprehended from the liberty to import slaves. So long a term will be

more dishonorable to the American character than to say nothing about

it in the constitution."[36]

Virginia's Attitude Toward Slavery and Secession · 第 63 / 287 题