CHAPTER V

DENTITION

In the most generalized snakes--those which show the nearest approach to

lizards--teeth are present not only on the rami of both jaws, but also

on the premaxillary bone, on the palatines, and on the pterygoids. A

reduction of the dentition takes place in various genera, in which the

teeth of either the upper or the lower jaw, and of the palatines or

pterygoids, or both, may be absent, and the premaxillary is devoid of

teeth in the great majority, including all European representatives, of

the Ophidia.

In the egg-eating snakes of the genera _Dasypeltis_ and _Elachistodon_

the dentition is very much reduced, in accordance with the peculiar

régime, and this deficiency is compensated by the development on some of

the anterior thoracic vertebræ of long, tooth-like processes

(hypapophyses) directed forwards, and capped with a remarkably dense,

vitreous tissue simulating enamel, the function of these tooth-like

processes being to break the shell of the egg within the gullet, where

none of its contents are lost, the shell being afterwards rejected

through the mouth in the form of a pellet.

With the exception of the worm-like Typhlopidæ, which are provided with

a few teeth in the upper jaw only, European snakes have teeth on the

maxillary, palatine, pterygoid, and dentary bones. Unless the maxillary

be strongly abbreviated and modified in connexion with the poison

apparatus, as in the Viperidæ, the teeth in the jaws as well as on the

palate form single longitudinal series; they are elongate, conical, with

or without a sharp posterior edge, more or less recurved, acutely

pointed, sometimes needle-like, and directed backwards, as behoves their

function, which, in addition to attack and defence, is to prevent the

retrogression of the prey in the act of prehension and deglutition. A

notable exception occurs in the genus _Iguanognathus_, from Sumatra, all

the teeth having spatulate crowns ribbed along the outer side.

Unfortunately, nothing is known as to the food of this remarkable snake.

The teeth are coated with a thin layer of enamel. It was held, for a

time, that the glossy outer coating was only due to a denser structure

of the dentine. As in all living Reptiles with the exception of the

Crocodiles, the teeth are not implanted in true sockets, but simply

ankylosed to the bone on which, when detached, their slightly enlarged

base, or rather the bony tissue on which it rests, leaves a shallow

impression, or pseudo-socket. In the process of biting or feeding, some

of the teeth are frequently lost, and are readily replaced by others

lying in reserve in the gum at the inner side, and becoming fixed to the

bone soon after a vacancy occurs. Such replacement teeth, of different

grades of development, form several series, so that in a snake like our

common _Tropidonotus_ the mouth may contain four times as many teeth as

are functional, without reckoning different earlier stages of tooth

germs which escape ordinary observation, being placed vertically one

above the other.

Three types of teeth, connected by every intermediate step, are

distinguished: the solid, the grooved, and the canaliculated or tubular,

so-called "perforated"; the third, as we shall explain, being only a

further modification of the second. In the grooved tooth, a sulcus runs

along the anterior or outer surface, its object being to convey into the

wound the secretion of a poison gland. It varies in depth according to

the species, and may be so slight as to escape detection without a very

strong magnifying glass. In some the sulcus may be very deep and wide,

forming a canal round which the tooth folds to the extent of its borders

nearly meeting; from this condition the so-called "perforated" fang is

derived through the complete fusion of the borders of the tooth, and the

obliteration of the line of union except at each extremity. The

structure of such a fang may be best understood by imagining a tooth,

lined all round with the same layer of dentine and enamel, being

flattened out in a vertical plane and then folded over, the outer edges

coalescing on the front median line in such a way that the inner wall of

the tooth is in reality the anterior surface, and the outer wall the

posterior surface, of the ordinary tooth.

Grooved teeth, with open canal, are situated either at the anterior

extremity (Proteroglyphs) or at the posterior extremity (Opisthoglyphs)

of the maxillary bone, usually followed or preceded by a series of solid

teeth, which in some cases may likewise show a more or less distinct

groove. Such may also be present on the teeth of the lower jaw, as in

the European _Coelopeltis_, in some specimens of which a faint groove is

visible on the outer side with the aid of a strong lens.

The tubular fangs of the Viperidæ are inserted on the posterior

extremity of the much abbreviated and erectile maxillary bone, which

bears no other teeth. The Proteroglyphs (Cobras, Coral-snakes,

Sea-snakes) and the Solenoglyphs (Vipers, Pit-vipers, Rattlesnakes) may

be regarded as the diverging extremes in the development of the poison

apparatus, both culminating in forms with tubular fangs, the former as

derived directly from the Aglyphs (harmless snakes), the latter from the

Opisthoglyphs, likewise evolved out of the Aglyphs. That the insertion

of the poison fangs of the Viperidæ is really on the posterior extremity

of the maxillary bone is evident from the condition of the bone in its

recumbent position, especially in the African Viper, _Causus_, which in

several respects departs less markedly from the Colubrid type than our

European Vipers.

The poison fangs of the Viperidæ appear to be movable, folding in the

mouth when at rest, and erected, or even thrust forward, when ready to

act. This, however, is simply due to the mobility of the maxillary bone,

to which they are ankylosed as in all other snakes. There are normally

two equally-developed fangs, close together and side by side, to each

maxillary, followed by several replacement fangs loosely attached behind

them, usually in two series of four. When the two fangs are _in situ_,

they of course both function in the act of biting, although only one is

in relation with the single poison duct; often, however, there is only

one fang in position, either the right or the left, the place of the

other being indicated by a shallow socket which will soon be filled by

one of the posterior reserve fangs moving forward and becoming ankylosed

to the bone. Snake-charmers who extract the poison fangs of the snakes

they use for their performances have therefore to renew the operation

frequently, unless they amputate the bone on which the fangs are

inserted, an injury which the creature does not long survive.

The dentition of the snakes in which the maxillary bone is not movable

vertically falls under three divisions: the Aglyphs, in which the teeth

are all solid; the Opisthoglyphs, in which one or more (usually two) of

the hindermost teeth are provided with a groove; and the Proteroglyphs,

in which grooved or canaliculated teeth are situated in front, followed

or not by solid teeth. Beyond these three principal divisions, the

dentition furnishes important characters for the classification,

although that importance has sometimes been over-estimated. The

maxillary teeth may be equal in length (Isodonts), or the anterior the

longer (Lycodonts), or the posterior the longer, increasing gradually in

size (Coryphodonts) or abruptly, without (Syncranterians) or with a

diastema, or break, in front of them (Diacranterians). These categories

are, however, so completely connected as to preclude their use in

taxonomy beyond helping to define genera. The number of maxillary teeth

and the relative proportions and disposition of the mandibular teeth

also afford useful generic characters.

The European genera may be arranged as follows, according to the

dentition:

I. Teeth few, disposed in a transverse series in the upper jaw only

_Typhlops._

II. Teeth in both jaws and on the palatines and pterygoids.

_A._ A series of solid teeth along the maxillary; no grooved teeth.

1. Anterior maxillary and mandibular teeth longest; 9 or 10

maxillary teeth

_Eryx._

2. Maxillary teeth equal, or increasing in size posteriorly.

_a._ Mandibular teeth 17 to 30; maxillary teeth 15 to 22.

Posterior maxillary teeth longest; mandibular teeth subequal, more than

20

_Tropidonotus._

Posterior maxillary teeth longest; mandibular teeth not more than 20,

posterior smallest

_Zamenis._

Maxillary teeth subequal; mandibular teeth 20 to 25, posterior smallest

_Coluber._

_b._ Mandibular teeth 14 or 15, subequal; maxillary teeth 12 to

15.

Maxillary teeth increasing in size

_Coronella._

Maxillary teeth subequal

_Contia._

_B._ One or two enlarged grooved fangs behind the series of solid

maxillary teeth.

14 to 17 subequal solid maxillary teeth, forming a continuous series;

21 to 23 mandibular teeth, anterior strongly enlarged

_Coelopeltis._

9 to 11 solid maxillary teeth, fourth and fifth or fifth and sixth

enlarged, followed by an interspace; sixth mandibular tooth fang-like,

followed by an interspace

_Macroprotodon._

9 or 10 solid maxillary teeth, forming a continuous series, decreasing

in length posteriorly; anterior mandibular teeth strongly enlarged

_Tarbophis._

_C._ Maxillary with only two large canaliculated fangs side by side,

one of which may be missing; anterior mandibular teeth longest

_Vipera_, _Ancistrodon_.

[Illustration: FIG. 12--MAXILLARY AND MANDIBLE OF--(_a_) _Tarbophis

fallax_; (_b_) _Coelopeltis monspessulana_; (_c_) _Macroprotodon

cucullatus_. (From British Museum Catalogue of Snakes)]

In counting the teeth for the purpose of using this key, care must be

taken to ascertain the full number, as it frequently happens that one or

more are missing; but their place is indicated by the shallow pits in

which their base was implanted, the overlooking of which might convey

the impression of a hiatus such as is characteristic of certain

genera--_Macroprotodon_, for instance. Needless to say, the loose teeth

which are in reserve on the inner side of the jaws or behind the tubular

fangs are not taken into consideration, the numbers given being those of

functional teeth only. Although as a rule the teeth can be counted

easily, on a specimen preserved in spirit, by simply pushing aside the

lips and gums with the finger, it is sometimes necessary to remove and

clean the bones of the jaws, an operation which does not require much

skill.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Snakes of Europe · 第 5 / 14 章