Sensible that the people, at all times, especially when their

understandings are obstructed by ignorance and bad education, are not

much susceptible of speculative instruction, Alfred endeavoured to

convey his morality by apologues, parables, stories, apophthegms,

couched in poetry; and besides propagating among his subjects former

compositions of that kind, which he found in the Saxon tongue [z], he

exercised his genius in inventing works of a like nature [a], as well

as in translating from the Greek the elegant fables of Aesop. He also

gave Saxon translations of Orosius’s and Bede’s histories; and of

Boethius concerning the consolation of philosophy [b]. And he deemed

it nowise derogatory from his other great characters of sovereign,

legislator, warrior, and politician, thus to lead the way to his

people in the pursuits of literature.

[FN [z] Asser. p. 13. [a] Spellman, p. 124. Abbas Rieval, p. 355.

[b] W. Malm. lib. 2. cap. 4. Brompton, p. 814.]

Meanwhile, this prince was not negligent in encouraging the vulgar and

mechanical arts, which have a more sensible, though not a closer,

connexion with the interests of society. He invited, from all

quarters, industrious foreigners to repeople his country, which had

been desolated by the ravages of the Danes [c]. He introduced and

encouraged manufactures of all kinds; and no inventor or improver of

any ingenious art did he suffer to go unrewarded [d]. He prompted men

of activity to betake themselves to navigation, to push commerce into

the most remote countries, and to acquire riches by propagating

industry among their fellow-citizens. He set apart a seventh portion

of his own revenue for maintaining a number of workmen, whom he

constantly employed in rebuilding the ruined cities, castles, palaces,

and monasteries [e]. Even the elegancies of life were brought to him

from the Mediterranean and the Indies [f]; and his subjects, by seeing

those productions of the peaceful arts, were taught to respect the

virtues of justice and industry, from which alone they could arise.

Both living and dead, Alfred was regarded by foreigners, no less than

by his own subjects, as the greatest prince after Charlemagne that had

appeared in Europe during several ages, and as one of the wisest and

best that had ever adorned the annals of any nation.

[FN [c] Asser. p. 13. Flor. Wigorn. p. 588. [d] Asser. p. 20. [e]

Asser. p. 20. W. Malmes. lib. 2. cap. 4. [f] W. Malmes. lib. 2. cap.

4.]

Alfred had, by his wife, Ethelswitha, daughter of a Mercian earl,

three sons and three daughters. The eldest son, Edmund, died without

issue, in his father’s lifetime. The third, Ethelward, inherited his

father’s passion for letters, and lived a private life. The second,

Edward, succeeded to his power; and passes by the appellation of

Edward the Elder, being the first of that name who sat on the English

throne.

[MN Edward the Elder. 901.]

This prince, who equalled his father in military talents, though

inferior to him in knowledge and erudition [g], found, immediately on

his accession, a specimen of that turbulent life to which all princes

and even all individuals were exposed, in an age when men, less

restrained by law or justice, and less occupied by industry, had no

aliment for their inquietude, but wars, insurrections, convulsions,

rapine, and depredation. Ethelwald, his cousin-german, son of King

Ethelbert, the elder brother of Alfred, insisted on his preferable

title [h]; and arming his partisans, took possession of Winburne,

where he seemed determined to defend himself to the last extremity,

and to await the issue of his pretensions [i]. But when the king

approached the town with a great army, Ethelwald, having the prospect

of certain destruction, made his escape, and fled first into Normandy,

thence into Northumberland; where he hoped that the people, who had

been recently subdued by Alfred, and who were impatient of peace,

would, on the intelligence of that great prince’s death, seize the

first pretence or opportunity of rebellion. The event did not

disappoint his expectations: the Northumbrians declared for him [k];

and Ethelwald having thus connected his interests with the Danish

tribes, went beyond sea, and collecting a body of these freebooters,

he excited the hopes of all those who had been accustomed to subsist

by rapine and violence [l]. The East Anglian Danes joined his party:

the Five-burgers, who were seated in the heart of Mercia, began to put

themselves in motion; and the English found that they were again

menaced with those convulsions, from which the valour and policy of

Alfred had so lately rescued them. The rebels, headed by Ethelwald,

made an incursion into the Counties of Gloucester, Oxford, and Wilts;

and having exercised their ravages in these places, they retired with

their booty, before the king, who had assembled an army, was able to

approach them. Edward, however, who was determined that his

preparations should not be fruitless, conducted his forces into East

Anglia, and retaliated the injuries which the inhabitants had

committed, by spreading the like devastation among them. Satiated

with revenge, and loaded with booty, he gave orders to retire: but the

authority of those ancient kings, which was feeble in peace, was not

much better established in the field; and the Kentish men, greedy of

more spoil, ventured, contrary to repeated orders, to stay behind him,

and to take up their quarters in Bury. This disobedience proved in the

issue fortunate to Edward. The Danes assaulted the Kentish men; but

met with so vigorous a resistance, that, though they gained the field

of battle, they bought that advantage by the loss of their bravest

leaders, and among the rest, by that of Ethelwald, who perished in the

action [m]. The king, freed from the fear of so dangerous a

competitor, made peace on advantageous terms with the East Angles [n].

[FN [g] W. Malmes lib. 2. cap. 5 Hoveden, p. 421. [h] Chron. Sax. p.

99, 100. [i] Ibid. p. 100. H. Hunting. lib. 5. p. 352. [k] Chron.

Sax. p. 100. H. Hunting. lib. 5. p. 352. [l] Chron. Sax. p. 100.

Chron. Abb. St. Petri de Burgo, p. 24. [m] Chron. Sax. p. 101.

Brompton, p. 832. [n] Chron. Sax. p. 102. Brompton, p. 832. Matth.

West. p. 181.]

In order to restore England to such a state of tranquillity as it was

then capable of attaining, nought was wanting but the subjection of

the Northumbrians, who, assisted by the scattered Danes in Mercia,

continually infested the bowels of the kingdom. Edward, in order to

divert the force of these enemies, prepared a fleet to attack them by

sea; hoping that, when his ships appeared on their coast, they must at

least remain at home, and provide for their defence. But the

Northumbrians were less anxious to secure their own property, than

greedy to commit spoil on their enemy; and concluding, that the chief

strength of the English was embarked on board the fleet, they thought

the opportunity favourable, and entered Edward’s territories with all

their forces. The king, who was prepared against this event, attacked

them on their return at Tetenhall, in the county of Stafford, put them

to rout, recovered all the booty, and pursued them with great

slaughter into their own country.

All the rest of Edward’s reign was a scene of continued and successful

action against the Northumbrians, the East Angles, the Five-burgers,

and the foreign Danes who invaded him from Normandy and Britany. Nor

was he less provident in putting his kingdom in a posture of defence,

than vigorous in assaulting the enemy. He fortified the towns of

Chester, Eddesbury, Warwick, Cherbury, Buckingham, Towcester, Maldon,

Huntingdon, and Colchester. He fought two signal battles at Temsford

and Maldon [o]. He vanquished Thurketill, a great Danish chief, and

obliged him to retire with his followers into France, in quest of

spoil and adventures. He subdued the East Angles, and forced them to

swear allegiance to him; he expelled the two rival princes of

Northumberland, Reginald and Sidroc, and acquired, for the present,

the dominion of that province: several tribes of the Britons were

subjected by him; and even the Scots, who, during the reign of Egbert,

had, under the conduct of Kenneth their king, increased their power by

the final subjection of the Picts, were nevertheless obliged to give

him marks of submission [p]. In all these fortunate achievements he

was assisted by the activity and prudence of his sister, Ethelfleda,

who was widow of Ethelbert, Earl of Mercia, and who, after her

husband’s death, retained the government of that province. This

princess, who had been reduced to extremity in childbed, refused

afterwards all commerce with her husband; not from any weak

superstition, as was common in that age, but because she deemed all

domestic occupations unworthy of her masculine and ambitious spirit

[q]. She died before her brother; and Edward, during the remainder of

his reign, took upon himself the immediate government of Mercia, which

before had been entrusted to the authority of a governor [r]. The

Saxon Chronicle fixes the death of this prince in 925 [s]: his kingdom

devolved to Athelstan, his natural son.

[FN [o] Chron. Sax. p. 108. Flor. Wigorn. p. 601. [p] Chron. Sax. p.

110. Hoveden, p. 421. [q] W. Malmes. lib. 2. cap. 5. M. West. p.

182. Ingulph. p. 28. Higden, p. 261. [r] Chron. Sax. p. 110.

Brompton, p. 831. [s] Page 110.]

[MN Athelstan 925.]

The stain in this prince’s birth was not, in those times, deemed so

considerable as to exclude him from the throne; and Athelstan, being

of an age, as well as of a capacity fitted for government, obtained

the preference to Edward’s younger children, who, though legitimate,

were of too tender years to rule a nation so much exposed both to

foreign invasion and to domestic convulsions. Some discontents,

however, prevailed on his accession; and Alfred, a nobleman of

considerable power, was thence encouraged to enter into a conspiracy

against him. This incident is related by historians with

circumstances, which the reader, according to the degree of credit he

is disposed to give them, may impute either to the invention of monks,

who forged them, or to their artifice, who found means of making them

real. Alfred, it is said, being seized upon strong suspicions, but

without any certain proof, firmly denied the .conspiracy imputed to

him; and in order to justify himself, he offered to swear to his

innocence before the pope, whose person, it was supposed, contained

such superior sanctity, that no one could presume to give a false oath

in his presence, and yet hope to escape the immediate vengeance of

heaven. The king accepted of the condition, and Alfred was conducted

to Rome; where, either conscious of his innocence, or neglecting the

superstition to which he appealed, he ventured to make the oath

required of him before John, who then filled the papal chair. But no

sooner had he pronounced the fatal words, than he fell into

convulsions, of which three days after he expired. The king, as if

the guilt of the conspirator were now fully ascertained, confiscated

his estate, and made a present of it to the monastery of Malmesbury

[t]; secure that no doubts would ever thenceforth be entertained

concerning the justice of his proceedings.

[FN [t] W. Malmes. lib. 2. cap. 6. Spell. Conc. p. 407.]

The dominion of Athelstan was no sooner established over his English

subjects, than he endeavoured to give security to the government, by

providing against the insurrections of the Danes, which had created so

much disturbance to his predecessors. He marched into Northumberland;

and finding that the inhabitants bore with impatience the English

yoke, he thought it prudent to confer on Sithric, a Danish nobleman,

the title of king, and to attach him to his interests, by giving him

his sister, Editha, in marriage. But this policy proved by accident

the source of dangerous consequences. Sithric died in a twelvemonth

after; and his two sons by a former marriage, Anlaf and Godfrid,

founding pretensions on their father’s elevation, assumed the

sovereignty without waiting for Athelstan’s consent. They were soon

expelled by the power of that monarch; and the former took shelter in

Ireland, as the latter did in Scotland; where he received, during some

time, protection from Constantine, who then enjoyed the crown of that.

kingdom. The Scottish prince, however, continually solicited, and

even menaced by Athelstan, at last promised to deliver up his guest;

but secretly detesting this treachery, he gave Godfrid warning to make

his escape [u]; and that fugitive, after subsisting by piracy for some

years, freed the king by his death from any farther anxiety.

Athelstan, resenting Constantine’s behaviour, entered Scotland with an

army; and ravaging the country with impunity [w], he reduced the Scots

to such distress, that their king was content to preserve his crown,

by making submissions to the enemy. The English historians assert

[x], that Constantine did homage to Athelstan for his kingdom; and

they add, that the latter prince, being urged by his courtiers to push

the present favourable opportunity, and entirely subdue Scotland,

replied, that it was more glorious to confer than conquer kingdoms

[y]. But those annals, so uncertain and imperfect in themselves, lose

all credit when national prepossessions and animosities have place:

and on that account, the Scotch historians, who, without having any

more knowledge of the matter, strenuously deny the fact, seem more

worthy of belief.

[FN [u] W. Malm. lib. 2. cap. 6. [w] Chron. Sax. p. 111. Hoveden, p.

422. H. Hunting. lib. 5. p. 354. [x] Hoveden, p. 422. [y] Wm.

Malmes. lib. 2. cap. 6. Anglia Sacra, vol. i. p. 212.]

Constantine, whether he owed the retaining of his crown to the

moderation of Athelstan, who was unwilling to employ all his

advantages against him, or to the policy of that prince, who esteemed

the humiliation of an enemy a greater acquisition than the subjection

of a discontented and mutinous people, thought the behaviour of the

English monarch more an object of resentment than of gratitude. He

entered into a confederacy with Anlaf, who had collected a great body

of Danish pirates, whom he found hovering in the Irish seas; and with

some Welsh princes, who were terrified at the growing power of

Athelstan: and all these allies made by concert an irruption with a

great army into England. Athelstan, collecting his forces, met the

enemy near Brunsbury, in Northumberland, and defeated them in a

general engagement. This victory was chiefly ascribed to the valour

of Turketul, the English chancellor: for in those turbulent ages no

one was so much occupied in civil employments, as wholly to lay aside

the military character [z].

[FN [z] The office of chancellor among the Anglo-Saxons resembled more

that of a secretary of state, than that of our present chancellor.

See Spellman, in voce CHANCELLARIUS.]

There is a circumstance not unworthy of notice, which historians

relate, with regard to the transactions of this war. Anlaf, on the

approach of the English army, thought that he could not venture too

much to ensure a fortunate event; and, employing the artifice formerly

practised by Alfred against the Danes, he entered the enemy’s camp in

the habit of a minstrel. The stratagem was for the present attended

with like success. He gave such satisfaction to the soldiers who

flocked about him, that they introduced him to the king’s tent; and

Anlaf, having played before that prince and his nobles during their

repast, was dismissed with a handsome reward. His prudence kept him

from refusing the present; but his pride determined him, on his

departure, to bury it, while he fancied that he was unespied by all

the world. But a soldier in Athelstan’s camp, who had formerly served

under Anlaf, had been struck with some suspicion on the first

appearance of the minstrel; and was engaged by curiosity to observe

all his motions. He regarded this last action as a full proof of

Anlaf’s disguise; and he immediately carried the intelligence to

Athelstan, who blamed him for not sooner giving him information, that

he might have seized his enemy. But the soldier told him, that, as he

had formerly sworn fealty to Anlaf, he could never have pardoned

himself the treachery of betraying and ruining his ancient master; and

that Athelstan himself, after such an instance of his criminal

conduct, would have had equal reason to distrust his allegiance.

Athelstan, having praised the generosity of the soldier’s principles,

reflected on the incident, which he foresaw might be attended with

important consequences. He removed his station in the camp; and as a

bishop arrived that evening with a reinforcement of troops, (for the

ecclesiastics were then no less warlike than the civil magistrates,)

he occupied with his train that very place which had been left vacant

by the king’s removal. The precaution of Athelstan was found prudent:

for no sooner had darkness fallen, than Anlaf broke into the camp, and

hastening directly to the place where he had left the king’s tent, put

the bishop to death before he had time to prepare for his defence [a].

[FN [a] W. Malmes. lib. 2 cap. 6. Higden, p. 263]

There fell several Danish and Welsh princes in the action of Brunsbury

[b]; and Constantine and Anlaf made their escape with difficulty,

leaving the greater part of their army on the field of battle. After

this success, Athelstan enjoyed his crown in tranquillity; and he is

regarded as one of the ablest and most active of those ancient

princes. He passed a remarkable law, which was calculated for the

encouragement of commerce, and which it required some liberality of

mind in that age to have devised: that a merchant, who had made three

long sea-voyages on his own account, should be admitted to the rank of

a Thane or Gentleman. This prince died at Gloucester in the year 941

[c], after a reign of sixteen years, and was succeeded by Edmund, his

legitimate brother.

[FN [b] Brompton, p. 839 Ingulph. p. 29 [c] Chron. Sax. p. 114.]

[MN Edmund 941.]

Edmund, on his accession, met with disturbance from the restless

Northumbrians, who lay in wait for every opportunity of breaking into

rebellion. But marching suddenly with his forces into their country,

he so overawed the rebels, that they endeavoured to appease him by the

most humble submissions [d]. In order to give him a surer pledge of

their obedience, they offered to embrace Christianity; a religion

which the English Danes had frequently professed, when reduced to

difficulties, but which, for that very reason, they regarded as a

badge of servitude, and shook off as soon as a favourable opportunity

offered. Edmund, trusting little to their sincerity in this forced

submission, used the precaution of removing the Five-burgers from the

towns of Mercia, in which they had been allowed to settle; because it

was always found, that they took advantage of every commotion, and

introduced the rebellious, or foreign Danes, into the heart of the

kingdom. He also conquered Cumberland from the Britons; and conferred

that territory on Malcolm, King of Scotland, on condition that he

should do him homage for it, and protect the north from all future

incursions of the Danes.

[FN [d] W. Malmes. lib. 2. cap. 7. Brompton, p. 857]

Edmund was young when he came to the crown; yet was his reign short,

as his death was violent. One day as he was solemnizing a festival in

the county of Gloucester, he remarked, that Leolf, a notorious robber,

whom he had sentenced to banishment, had yet the boldness to enter the

hall where he himself dined, and to sit at table with his attendants.

Enraged at this insolence, he ordered him to leave the room; but on

his refusing to obey, the king, whose temper, naturally choleric, was

inflamed by this additional insult, leaped on him himself, and seized

him by the hair: but the ruffian, pushed to extremity, drew his

dagger, and gave Edmund a wound, of which he immediately expired.

This event happened in the year 946, and in the sixth year of the

king’s reign. Edmund left male issue, but so young, that they were

incapable of governing the kingdom; and his brother, Edred, was

promoted to the throne.

[MN Edred 946.]

The reign of this prince, as those of his predecessors, was disturbed

by the rebellions and incursions of the Northumbrian Danes, who,

though frequently quelled, were never entirely subdued, nor had ever

paid a sincere allegiance to the crown of England. The accession of a

new king seemed to them a favourable opportunity for shaking off the

yoke; but on Edred’s appearance with an army, they made him their

wonted submissions; and the king having wasted the country with fire

and sword, as a punishment for their rebellion, obliged them to renew

their oaths of allegiance; and he straight retired with his forces.

The obedience of the Danes lasted no longer than the present terror.

Provoked at the devastations of Edred, and even reduced by necessity

to subsist on plunder, they broke into a new rebellion, and were again

subdued; but the king, now instructed by experience, took greater

precautions against their future revolt. He fixed English garrisons

in their most considerable towns; and placed over them an English

governor, who might watch all their motions, and suppress any

insurrection on its first appearance. He obliged also Malcolm, King

of Scotland, to renew his homage for the lands which he held in

England.

Edred, though not unwarlike, nor unfit for active life, lay under the

influence of the lowest superstition, and had blindly delivered over

his conscience to the guidance of Dunstan, commonly called St.

Dunstan, Abbot of Glastonbury, whom he advanced to the highest

offices, and who covered, under the appearance of sanctity, the most

violent and most insolent ambition. Taking advantage of the implicit

confidence reposed in him by the king, this churchman imported into

England a new order of monks, who much changed the state of

ecclesiastical affairs, and excited, on their first establishment, the

most violent commotions.

From the introduction of Christianity among the Saxons, there had been

monasteries in England; and these establishments had extremely

multiplied, by the donations of the princes and nobles; whose

superstition, derived from their ignorance and precarious life, and

increased by remorse for the crimes into which they were so frequently

betrayed, knew no other expedient for appeasing the Deity than a

profuse liberality towards the ecclesiastics. But the monks had

hitherto been a species of secular priests, who lived after the manner

of the present canons or prebendaries, and were both intermingled, in

some degree, with the world, and endeavoured to render themselves

useful to it. They were employed in the education of youth [e]: they

had the disposal of their own time and industry: they were not

subjected to the rigid rules of an order: they had made no vows of

implicit obedience to their superiors [f]: and they still retained the

choice, without quitting the convent, either of a married or a single

life [g]. But a mistaken piety had produced in Italy a new species of

monks called Benedictines; who, carrying farther the plausible

principles of mortification, secluded themselves entirely from the

world, renounced all claim to liberty, and made a merit of the most

inviolable chastity. These practices and principles, which

superstition at first engendered, were greedily embraced and promoted

by the policy of the court of Rome. The Roman pontiff, who was making

every day great advances towards an absolute sovereignty over the

ecclesiastics, perceived that the celibacy of the clergy alone could

break off entirely their connexion with the civil power, and depriving

them of every other object of ambition, engage them to promote, with

unceasing industry, the grandeur of their own order. He was sensible,

that so long as the monks were indulged in marriage, and were

permitted to rear families, they never could be subjected to strict

discipline, or reduced to that slavery under their superiors, which

was requisite to procure to the mandates issued from Rome, a ready and

zealous obedience. Celibacy, therefore, began to be extolled, as the

indispensable duty of priests; and the pope undertook to make all the

clergy throughout the western world renounce at once the privilege of

marriage: a fortunate policy; but at the same time an undertaking the

most difficult of any, since he had the strongest propensities of

human nature to encounter, and found, that the same connexions with

the female sex, which generally encourage devotion, were here

unfavourable to the success of his project. It is no wonder

therefore, that this master-stroke of art should have met with violent

contradiction, and that the interests of the hierarchy, and the

inclinations of the priests, being now placed in this singular

opposition, should, notwithstanding the continued efforts of Rome,

have retarded the execution of that bold scheme, during the course of

near three centuries.

[FN [e] Osberne in Anglia Sacra, tom. 2. p. 92. [f] Osberne, p. 91.

[g] See Wharton’s notes to Anglia Sacra, tom. 2. p. 91. Gervase, p.

1645. Chron Wint. MS. apud Spell. Conc. p. 434.]

As the bishops and parochial clergy lived apart with their families,

and were more connected with the world, the hopes of success with them

were fainter; and the pretence for making them renounce marriage was

much less plausible. But the pope, having cast his eye on the monks

as the basis of his authority, was determined to reduce them under

strict rules of obedience, to procure them the credit of sanctity by

an appearance of the most rigid mortification, and to break off all

their other ties which might interfere with his spiritual policy.

Under pretence, therefore, of reforming abuses, which were, in some

degree, unavoidable in the ancient establishments, he had already

spread over the southern countries of Europe the severe laws of the

monastic life, and began to form attempts towards a like innovation in

England. The favourable opportunity offered itself, (and it was

greedily seized,) arising from the weak, superstition of Edred, and

the violent impetuous character of Dunstan.

Dunstan was born of noble parents in the west of England; and being

educated under his uncle Aldhelm, then Archbishop of Canterbury, had

betaken himself to the ecclesiastical life, and had acquired some

character in the court of Edmund. He was, however, represented to

that prince as a man of licentious manners [h]: and finding his

fortune blasted by these suspicions, his ardent ambition prompted him

to repair his indiscretions by running into an opposite extreme. He

secluded himself entirely from the world; he framed a cell so small,

that he could neither stand erect in it nor stretch out his limbs

during his repose; and he here employed himself perpetually either in

devotion or in manual labour [i]. It is probable, that his brain

became gradually crazed by these solitary occupations, and that his

head was filled with chimeras, which, being believed by himself and

his stupid votaries, procured him the general character of sanctity

among the people. He fancied that the devil, among the frequent

visits which he paid him, was one day more earnest than usual in his

temptations; till Dunstan, provoked at his importunity, seized him by

the nose with a pair of red-hot pincers, as he put his head into the

cell; and he held him there till that malignant spirit made the whole

neighbourhood resound with his bellowings. This notable exploit was

seriously credited and extolled by the public: it is transmitted to

posterity by one who, considering the age in which he lived, may pass

for a writer of some eloquence [k]; and it ensured to Dunstan a

reputation which no real piety, much less virtue, could, even in the

most enlightened period, have ever procured him with the people.

[FN [h] Osberne, p. 95 Matth West, p. 187. [i] Osberne, p. 96. [k]

Osberne, p. 97.]

Supported by the character obtained in his retreat, Dunstan appeared

again in the world; and gained such an ascendant over Edred, who had

succeeded to the crown, as made him not only the director of that

prince’s conscience, but his counsellor in the most momentous affairs

of government. He was placed at the head of the treasury [l], and

being thus possessed both of power at court, and of credit with the

populace, he was enabled to attempt with success the most arduous

enterprises. Finding that his advancement had been owing to the

opinion of his austerity, he professed himself a partisan of the rigid

monastic rules; and after introducing that reformation into the

convents of Glastonbury and Abingdon, he endeavoured to render it

universal in the kingdom.

[FN [1] Ibid. p. 102. Wallingford, p. 541.]

The minds of men were already well prepared for this innovation. The

praises of an inviolable chastity had been carried to the highest

extravagance by some of the first preachers of Christianity among the

Saxons: the pleasures of love had been represented as incompatible

with Christian perfection; and a total abstinence from all commerce

with the sex was deemed such a meritorious penance, as was sufficient

to atone for the greatest enormities. The consequence seemed natural,

that those, at least, who officiated at the altar should be clear of

this pollution; and when the doctrine of transubstantiation, which was

now creeping in [m], was once fully established, the reverence to the

real body of Christ in the eucharist bestowed on this argument an

additional force and influence. The monks knew how to avail

themselves of all these popular topics, and to set off their own

character to the best advantage. They affected the greatest austerity

of life and manners: they indulged themselves in the highest strains

of devotion: they inveighed bitterly against the vices and pretended

luxury of the age: they were particularly vehement against the

dissolute lives of the secular clergy, their rivals: every instance of

libertinism in any individual of that order was represented as a

general corruption: and where other topics of defamation were wanting,

their marriage became a sure subject of invective, and their wives

received the name of CONCUBINE, or other more opprobrious appellation.

The secular clergy, on the other hand, who were numerous and rich, and

possessed of the ecclesiastical dignities, defended themselves with

vigour, and endeavoured to retaliate upon their adversaries. The

people were thrown into agitation; and few instances occur of more

violent dissensions, excited by the most material differences in

religion, or rather by the most frivolous: since it is a just remark,

that the more affinity there is between theological parties, the

greater commonly is their animosity.

[FN [m] Spell. Conc. v. i. p. 452.]

The progress of the monks, which was become considerable, was somewhat

retarded by the death of Edred, their partisan, who expired after a

reign of nine years [n]. He left children; but as they were infants,

his nephew, Edwy, son of Edmund, was placed on the throne.

[FN [n] Chron. Sax. p. 115.]

[MN Edwy. 955.]

Edwy, at the time of his accession, was not above sixteen or seventeen

years of age, was possessed of the most amiable figure, and was even

endowed, according to authentic accounts, with the most promising

virtues [o]. He would have been the favourite of his people, had he

not unhappily, at the commencement of his reign, been engaged in a

controversy with the monks, whose rage, neither the graces of the body

nor virtues of the mind could mitigate, and who have pursued his

memory with the same unrelenting vengeance which they exercised

against his person and dignity during his short and unfortunate reign.

There was a beautiful princess of the royal blood, called Elgiva, who

had made impression on the tender heart of Edwy; and as he was of an

age when the force of the passions first begins to be felt, he had

ventured, contrary to the advice of his gravest counsellors, and the

remonstrances of the more dignified ecclesiastics [p], to espouse her;

though she was within the degrees of affinity prohibited by the canon

law [q]. As the austerity affected by the monks made them

particularly violent on this occasion, Edwy entertained a strong

prepossession against them; and seemed, on that account, determined

not to second their project of expelling the seculars from all the

convents, and of possessing themselves of those rich establishments.

War was therefore declared between the king and the monks; and the

former soon found reason to repent his provoking such dangerous

enemies. On the day of his coronation, his nobility were assembled in

a great hall, and were indulging themselves in that riot and disorder,

which, from the example of their German ancestors, had become habitual

to the English [r]; when Edwy, attracted by softer pleasures, retired

into the queen’s apartment, and in that privacy gave reins to his

fondness towards his wife, which was only moderately checked by the

presence of her mother. Dunstan conjectured the reason of the king’s

retreat; and carrying along with him Odo, Archbishop of Canterbury,

over whom he had gained an absolute ascendant, he burst into the

apartment, upbraided Edwy with his lasciviousness, probably bestowed

on the queen the most opprobrious epithet that can be applied to her

sex, and tearing him from her arms, pushed him back, in a disgraceful

manner, into the banquet of the nobles [s]. Edwy, though young, and

opposed by the prejudices of the people, found an opportunity of

taking revenge for this public insult. He questioned Dunstan

concerning the administration of the treasury during the reign of his

predecessor [t]; and when that minister refused to give any account of

money expended, as he affirmed, by orders of the late king, he accused

him of malversation in his office and banished him the kingdom. But

Dunstan’s cabal was not inactive during his absence; they filled the

public with high panegyrics on his sanctity; they exclaimed against

the impiety of the king and queen; and having poisoned the minds of

the people by these declamations, they proceeded to still more

outrageous acts of violence against the royal authority. Archbishop

Odo sent into the palace a party of soldiers, who seized the queen,

and, having burned her face with a red-hot iron, in order to destroy

that fatal beauty which had seduced Edwy, they carried her by force

into Ireland, there to remain in perpetual exile [u]. Edwy, finding

it in vain to resist, was obliged to consent to his divorce, which was

pronounced by Odo [w]; and catastrophe, still more dismal, awaited the

unhappy Elgiva. That amiable princess, being cured of her wounds, and

having even obliterated the scars with which Odo had hoped to deface

her beauty, returned into England, and was flying to the embraces of

the king, whom she still regarded as her husband; when she fell into

the hands of a party, whom the primate had sent to intercept her.

Nothing but her death could now give security to Odo and the monks;

and the most cruel death was requisite to satiate their vengeance.

She was hamstringed; and expired a few days after at Gloucester, in

the most acute torments [x].

[FN [o] H. Hunting. lib. 5. p. 356. [p] W. Malmes. lib. 2. cap. 7.

[q] Ibid. [r] Wallingford, p. 542. [s] W. Malmes. lib. 2. cap. 7.

Osberne, p. 83, 105. M. West. p. 195, 196. [t] Wallingford, p. 542.

Alur. Beverl. p. 112. [u] Osberne, p. 84. Gervase, p. 1644. [w]

Hoveden, p. 425. [x] Osberne, p. 84. Gervase, p. 1645, 1646.]

The English, blinded with superstition, instead of being shocked with

this inhumanity, exclaimed that the misfortunes of Edwy and his

consort were a just judgment for their dissolute contempt of the

ecclesiastical statutes. They even proceeded to rebellion against

their sovereign; and having placed Edgar at their head, the younger

brother of Edwy, a boy of thirteen years of age, they soon put him in

possession of Mercia, Northumberland, East Anglia; and chased Edwy

into the southern counties. That it might not be doubtful at whose

instigation this revolt was undertaken, Dunstan returned into England,

and took upon him the government of Edgar and his party. He was first

installed in the see of Worcester, then in that of London [y], and on

Odo’s death, and the violent expulsion of Brithelm, his successor, in

that of Canterbury [z]; of all which he long kept possession. Odo is

transmitted to us by the monks under the character of a man of piety;

Dunstan was even canonized: and is one of those numerous saints of the

same stamp who disgrace the Romish calendar. Meanwhile the unhappy

Edwy was excommunicated [a], and pursued with unrelenting vengeance;

but his death, which happened soon after, freed his enemies from all

further inquietude, and gave Edgar peaceable possession of the

government [b].

[FN [y] Chron. Sax. p. 117. Flor Wigorn. p. 605. Wallingford, p. 544

[z] Hoveden p. 425. Osberne, p. 109. [a] Brompton, p. 863. [b] See

note [B] at the end of the volume.]

[MN Edgar.]

This prince, who mounted the throne in such early youth, soon

discovered an excellent capacity in the administration of affairs; and

his reign is one of the most fortunate that we meet with in the

ancient English history. He showed no aversion to war, he made the

wisest preparations against invaders; and by his vigour and foresight

he was enabled, without any danger of suffering insults, to indulge

his inclination towards peace, and to employ himself in supporting and

improving the internal government of his kingdom. He maintained a

body of disciplined troops; which he quartered in the north, in order

to keep the mutinous Northumbrians in subjection, and to repel the

inroads of the Scots. He built and supported a powerful navy [c]; and

that he might retain the seamen in the practice of their duty, and

always present a formidable armament to his enemies, he stationed

three squadrons off the coast, and ordered them to make, from time to

time, the circuit of his dominions [d]. The foreign Danes dared not

to approach a country which appeared in such a posture of defence: the

domestic Danes saw inevitable destruction to be the consequence of

their tumults and insurrections: the neighbouring sovereigns, the King

of Scotland, the Princes of Wales, of the Isle of Man, of the Orkneys,

and even of Ireland [e], were reduced to pay submission to so

formidable a monarch. He carried his superiority to a great height,

and might have excited an universal combination against him, had not

his power been so well established as to deprive his enemies of all

hope of shaking it. It is said, that residing once at Chester, and

having purposed to go by water to the abbey of St. John the Baptist,

he obliged eight of his tributary princes to row him in a barge upon

the Dee [f]. The English historians are fond of mentioning the name

of Kenneth III, King of Scots, among the number: the Scottish

historians either deny the fact, or assert that their king, if ever he

acknowledged himself a vassal to Edgar, did him homage not for his

crown, but for the dominions which he held in England.

[FN [c] Higden, p. 265. [d] See note [C] at the end of the volume.

[e] Spell. Conc. p. 32. [f] W. Malmes. lib. 2. cap. 8. Hoveden, p.

406. H. Hunting. lib. 5. p. 356.]

But the chief means by which Edgar maintained his authority, and

preserved public peace, was the paying of court to Dunstan and the

monks, who had at first placed him on the throne, and who, by their

pretensions to superior sanctity and purity of manners, had acquired

an ascendant over the people. He favoured their scheme for

dispossessing the secular canons of all the monasteries [g]; he

bestowed preferment on none but their partisans; he allowed Dunstan to

resign the see of Worcester into the hands of Oswald, one of his

creatures [h]; and to place Ethelwold, another of them, in that of

Winchester [i]; he consulted these prelates in the administration of

all ecclesiastical, and even in that of many civil affairs; and though

the vigour of his own genius prevented him from being implicitly

guided by them, the king and the bishops found such advantages in

their mutual agreement, that they always acted in concert, and united

their influence in preserving the peace and tranquillity of the

kingdom.

[FN [g] Chron. Sax. p. 117, 118. W. Malmes. lib. 2. cap. 8. Hoveden,

p. 425, 426 Osberne, p. 112. [h] W. Malmes. lib. 2. cap. 8.

Hoveden, p. 425.]

In order to complete the great work of placing the new order of monks

in all the convents, Edgar summoned a general council of the prelates

and the heads of the religious orders. He here inveighed against the

dissolute lives of the secular clergy; the smallness of their tonsure,

which, it is probable, maintained no longer any resemblance to the

crown of thorns; their negligence in attending the exercise of their

function; their mixing with the laity in the pleasures of gaming,

hunting, dancing, and singing; and their openly living with

concubines, by which it is commonly supposed he meant their wives. He

then turned himself to Dunstan, the primate; and in the name of King

Edred, whom he supposed to look down from heaven with indignation

against all those enormities, he thus addressed him: "It is you,

Dunstan, by whose advice I founded monasteries, built churches, and

expended my treasure in the support of religion and religious houses.

You were my counsellor and assistant in all my schemes: you were the

director of my conscience: to you I was obedient in all things. When

did you call for supplies which I refused you? Was my assistance ever

wanting to the poor? Did I deny support and establishments to the

clergy and the convents? Did I not hearken to your instructions, who

told me that these charities were, of all others, the most grateful to

my Maker, and fixed a perpetual fund for the support of religion? And

are all our pious endeavours now frustrated by the dissolute lives of

the priests? Not that I throw any blame on you; you have reasoned,

besought, inculcated, inveighed; but it now behoves you to use sharper

and more vigorous remedies; and conjoining your spiritual authority

with the civil power, to purge effectually the temple of God from

thieves and intruders [k]." It is easy to imagine that this harangue

had the desired effect; and that, when the king and prelates thus

concurred with the popular prejudices, it was not long before the

monks prevailed, and established their new discipline in almost all

the convents.

[FN [i] Gervase, p. 1646. Brompton, p. 864. Flor. Wigorn. p. 606.

Chron. Abb. St. Petri de Burgo, p 27, 28. [k] Abbas Rieval. p. 360,

361. Spell. Conc. p. 476, 477, 478]

We may remark, that the declamations against the secular clergy are,

both here and in all the historians, conveyed in general terms; and as

that order of men are commonly restrained by the decency of their

character, it is difficult to believe that the complaints against

their dissolute manners could be so universally just as is pretended.

It is more probable that the monks paid court to the populace by an

affected austerity of life; and representing the most innocent

liberties, taken by the other clergy, as great and unpardonable

enormities, thereby prepared the way for the increase of their own

power and influence. Edgar, however, like a true politician,

concurred with the prevailing party; and he even indulged them in

pretensions, which, though they might, when complied with, engage the

monks to support royal authority during his own reign, proved

afterwards dangerous to his successors, and gave disturbance to the

whole civil power. He seconded the policy of the court of Rome, in

granting to some monasteries an exemption from episcopal jurisdiction;

he allowed the convents, even those of royal foundation, to usurp the

election of their own abbot: and he admitted their forgeries of

ancient charters, by which, from the pretended grant of former kings,

they assumed many privileges and immunities [l]

[FN [l] Chron. Sax. p. 118. W. Malmes. lib. 2. cap. 8. Seldeni

Spicileg. ad Eadm. p. 149, 157.]

These merits of Edgar have procured him the highest panegyrics from

the monks, and he is transmitted to us, not only under the character

of a consummate statesman and an active prince, praises to which he

seems to have been justly entitled, but under that of a of a great

saint and a man of virtue. But nothing could more betray both his

hypocrisy in inveighing against the licentiousness of the secular

clergy, and the interested spirit of his partisans, in bestowing such

eulogies on his piety, than the usual tenour of his conduct, which was

licentious to the highest degree, and violated every law, human and

divine. Yet those very monks who, as we are told by Ingulf, a very

ancient historian, had no idea of any moral or religious merit, except

chastity and obedience, not only connived at his enormities, but

loaded him with the greatest praises. History, however, has preserved

some instances of his amours, from which, as from a specimen, we may

form a conjecture of the rest.

Edgar broke into a convent, carried off Editha, a nun, by force, and

even committed violence on her person [m]. For this act of sacrilege

he was reprimanded by Dunstan; and that he might reconcile himself to

the church, he was obliged not to separate from his mistress, but to

abstain from wearing his crown during seven years, and to deprive

himself so long of that vain ornament [n]; punishment very unequal to

that which had been inflicted on the unfortunate Edwy, who, for a

marriage which, in the strictest sense, could only deserve the name

of irregular, was expelled his kingdom, saw his queen treated with

singular barbarity, was loaded with calumnies, and has been

represented to us under the most odious colours. Such is the

ascendant which may be attained, by hypocrisy and cabal, over mankind.

[FN [m] W. Malmes. lib. 2. cap. 8. Osberne, p. 3. Diceto p. 457.

Higden, p. 265, 267, 266. Spell. Conc. p. 481. [n] Osberne, p. 111.]

There was another mistress of Edgar, with whom he first formed a

connexion by a kind of accident. Passing one day by Andover, he

lodged in the house of a nobleman, whose daughter, being endowed with

all the graces of person and behaviour, inflamed him at first sight

with the highest desire; and he resolved by any expedient to gratify

it. As he had not leisure to employ courtship or address for

attaining his purpose, he went directly to her mother, declared the

violence of his passion, and desired that the young lady might be

allowed to pass that very night with him. The mother was a woman of

virtue, and determined not to dishonour her daughter and her family by

compliance; but being well acquainted with the impetuosity of the

king’s temper, she thought it would be easier, as well as safer, to

deceive than refuse him. She feigned therefore a submission to his

will; but secretly ordered a waiting maid, of no disagreeable figure,

to steal into the king’s bed, after all the company should be retired

to rest. In the morning before daybreak, the damsel, agreeably to the

injunctions of her mistress, offered to retire; but Edgar, who had no

reserve in his pleasures, and whose love to his bedfellow was rather

inflamed by enjoyment, refused his consent, and employed force and

entreaties to detain her. Elfleda, (for that was the name of the

maid,) trusting to her own charms, and to the love with which, she

hoped, she had now inspired the king, made probably but a faint

resistance; and the return of light discovered the deceit to Edgar.

He had passed a night so much to his satisfaction, that he expressed

no displeasure with the old lady on account of her fraud; his love was

transferred to Elfleda; she became his favourite mistress; and

maintained her ascendant over him till his marriage with Elfrida [o].

[FN [o] W. Malmes. lib. 2. cap. 8. Higden, p. 268.]

The circumstances of his marriage with this lady were more singular

and more criminal. Elfrida was daughter and heir of Olgar, Earl of

Devonshire; and though she had been educated in the country, and had

never appeared at court, she had filled all England with the

reputation of her beauty. Edgar himself, who was indifferent to no

accounts of this nature, found his curiosity excited by the frequent

panegyrics which he heard of Elfrida; and reflecting on her noble

birth, he resolved, if he found her charms answerable to their fame,

to obtain possession of her on honourable terms. He communicated his

intention to Earl Athelwold, his favourite; but used the precaution,

before he made any advances to her parents, to order that nobleman, on

some pretence, to pay them a visit, and to bring him a certain account

of the beauty of their daughter. Athelwold, when introduced to the

young lady, found general report to have fallen short of the truth;

and being actuated by the most vehement love, he determined to

sacrifice to this new passion his fidelity to his master, and to the

trust reposed in him. He returned to Edgar and told him, that the

riches alone, and high quality of Elfrida, had been the ground of the

admiration paid her; and that her charms, far from being anywise

extraordinary, would have been overlooked in a woman of inferior

station. When he had, by this deceit, diverted the king from his

purpose, he took an opportunity, after some interval, of turning again

the conversation on Elfrida; he remarked, that though the parentage

and fortune of the lady had not produced on him, as on others, any

illusion with regard to her beauty, he could not forbear reflecting,

that she would, on the whole, be an advantageous match for him, and

might, by her birth and riches, make him sufficient compensation for

the homeliness of her person. If the king, therefore, gave his

approbation, he was determined to make proposals in his own behalf to

the Earl of Devonshire, and doubted not to obtain his, as well as the

young lady’s consent to the marriage. Edgar, pleased with an

expedient for establishing his favourite’s fortune, not only exhorted

him to execute his purpose, but forwarded his success by his

recommendations to the parents of Elfrida; and Athelwold was soon made

happy in the possession of his mistress. Dreading, however, the

detection of the artifice, he employed every pretence for detaining

Elfrida in the country, and for keeping her at a distance from Edgar.

The violent passion of Athelwold had rendered him blind to the

necessary consequences which must attend his conduct, and the

advantages which the numerous enemies that always pursue a royal

favourite would, by its means, be able to make against him. Edgar was

soon informed of the truth; but before he would execute vengeance on

Athelwold’s treachery, he resolved to satisfy himself with his own

eyes of the certainty and full extent of his guilt. He told him that

he intended to pay him a visit in his castle, and be introduced to the

acquaintance of his new married wife; and Athelwold, as he could not

refuse the honour, only craved leave to go before him a few hours,

that he might the better prepare every thing for his reception. He

then discovered the whole matter to Elfrida; and begged her, if she

had any regard either to her own honour or his life, to conceal from

Edgar, by every circumstance of dress and behaviour, that fatal

beauty, which had seduced him from fidelity to his friend, and had

betrayed him into so many falsehoods. Elfrida promised compliance,

though nothing was farther from her intentions. She deemed herself

little beholden to Athelwold for a passion which had deprived her of a

crown; and knowing the force of her own charms, she did not despair

even yet of reaching that dignity, of which her husband’s artifice had

bereaved her. She appeared before the king with all the advantages

which the richest attire and the most engaging airs could bestow upon

her, and she excited at once in his bosom the highest love towards

herself, and the most furious desire of revenge against her husband.

He knew, however, how to dissemble these passions; and seducing

Athelwold into a wood, on pretence of hunting, he stabbed him with his

own hand, and soon after publicly espoused Elfrida [p].

[FN [p] W. Malmes. lib. 2. cap. 8. Hoveden, p. 426. Brompton, p.

865, 866. Flor. Wigorn. p. 606. Higd. p. 268.]

Before we conclude our account of this reign, we must mention two

circumstances which are remarked by historians. The reputation of

Edgar allured a great number of foreigners to visit his court; and he

gave them encouragement to settle in England [q]. We are told that

they imported all the vices of their respective countries, and

contributed to corrupt the simple manners of the natives [r]. But as

this simplicity of manners, so highly and often so injudiciously

extolled, did not preserve them from barbarity and treachery, the

greatest of all vices, and the most incident to a rude uncultivated

people, we ought perhaps to deem their acquaintance with foreigners

rather an advantage; as it tended to enlarge their views, and to cure

them of those illiberal prejudices and rustic manners to which

islanders are often subject.

[FN [q] Chron. Sax. p. 116. H. Hunting. lib 5. p. 356. Brompton, p.

865. [r] W. Malmes. lib. 2. cap. 8.]

Another remarkable incident of this reign was the extirpation of

wolves from England. This advantage was attained by the industrious

policy of Edgar. He took great pains in hunting and pursuing those

ravenous animals; and when he found that all that escaped him had

taken shelter in the mountains and forests of Wales, he changed the

tribute of money imposed on the Welsh princes by Athelstan, his

predecessor [s], into an annual tribute of three hundred heads of

wolves; which produced such diligence in hunting them, that the animal

has been no more seen in this island.

[FN [s] W. Malmes. lib. 2. cap. 6. Brompton, p. 838.]

Edgar died after a reign of sixteen years, and in the thirty-third of

his age. He was succeeded by Edward, whom he had by his first

marriage with the daughter of Earl Ordmer.

[MN Edward the Martyr. 957.]

The succession of this prince, who was only fifteen years of age at

his father’s death, did not take place without much difficulty and

opposition. Elfrida, his stepmother, had a son, Ethelred, seven years

old, whom she attempted to raise to the throne: she affirmed that

Edgar’s marriage with the mother of Edward was exposed to insuperable

objections; and as she had possessed great credit with her husband,

she had found means to acquire partisans, who seconded all her

pretensions. But the title of Edward was supported by many

advantages. He was appointed successor by the will of his father [t]:

he was approaching to man’s estate, and might soon be able to take

into his own hands the reins of government: the principal nobility,

dreading the imperious temper of Elfrida, were averse to her son’s

government, which must enlarge her authority, and probably put her in

possession of the regency: above all, Dunstan, whose character of

sanctity had given him the highest credit with the people, had

espoused the cause of Edward, over whom he had already acquired a

great ascendant [u]; and he was determined to execute the will of

Edgar in his favour. To cut off all opposite pretensions, Dunstan

resolutely anointed and crowned the young prince at Kingston; and the

whole kingdom, without farther dispute, submitted to him [w].

[FN [t] Hoveden, p. 427. Eadmer, p. 3. [u] Eadmer, ex. edit.

Seldeni, p. 3. [w] W. Malm. lib. 2. cap. 9. Hoveden, p. 427.

Osberne, p. 113.]

It was of great importance to Dunstan and the monks, to place on the

throne a king favourable to their cause: the secular clergy had still

partisans in England, who wished to support them in the possession of

the convents, and of the ecclesiastical authority. On the first

intelligence of Edgar’s death, Alfere, Duke of Mercia, expelled the

new orders of monks from all the monasteries which lay within his

jurisdiction [x]; but Elfwin, Duke of East Anglia, and Brithnot, Duke

of the East Saxons, protected them within their territories, and

insisted upon the execution of the late laws enacted in their favour.

In order to settle this controversy, there were summoned several

synods, which, according to the practice of those times, consisted

partly of ecclesiastical members, partly of the lay nobility. The

monks were able to prevail in these assemblies; though, as it appears,

contrary to the secret wishes, if not the declared inclination, of the

leading men in the nation [y]: they had more invention in forging

miracles to support their cause; or having been so fortunate as to

obtain, by their pretended austerities, the character of piety, their

miracles were more credited by the populace.

[FN [x] Chron. Sax. p. 123. W. Malmes. lib. 2, cap. 9. Hoveden, p.

427. Brompton, p. 870. Flor. Wigorn. p. 607. [y] W. Malmes. lib. 2.

cap. 9.]

In one synod, Dunstan, finding the majority of votes against him, rose

up and informed the audience, that he had that instant received an

immediate revelation in behalf of the monks: the assembly was so

astonished at this intelligence, or probably so overawed by the

populace, that they proceeded no farther in their deliberations. In

another synod, a voice issued from the crucifix, and informed the

members that the establishment of the monks was founded on the will of

Heaven, and could not be opposed without impiety [z]. But the miracle

performed in the third synod was still more alarming: the floor of the

hall in which the assembly met sunk of a sudden and a great number of

the members were either bruised or killed by the fall. It was

remarked, that Dunstan had that day prevented the king from attending

the synod, and that the beam, on which his own chair stood, was the

only one that did not sink under the weight of the assembly [a]. But

these circumstances, instead of begetting any suspicion of

contrivance, were regarded as the surest proof of the immediate

interposition of Providence in behalf of those favourites of Heaven.

[FN [z] W. Malmes. lib. 2. cap. 9. Osberne, p. 112. Gervase, p.

1647. Brompton, p. 870. Higden, p. 269. [a] Chron. Sax. p. 124. W.

Malmes. lib. 2. cap. 9. Hoveden, p. 427. H. Hunting. lib. 5. p. 357.

Gervase, p. 1647. Brompton, p. 870. Flor. Wigorn. p. 607. Higden,

p. 269. Chron. Abb. St. Petri de Burgo, p. 29.]

Edward lived four years after his accession, and there passed nothing

memorable during his reign. His death alone was memorable and

tragical [b]: this young prince was endowed with the most amiable

innocence of manners; and as his own intentions were always pure, he

was incapable of entertaining any suspicion against others. Though

his step-mother had opposed his succession, and had raised a party in

favour of her own son, he always showed her marks of regard, and even

expressed, on all occasions, the most tender affection towards his

brother. He was hunting one day in Dorsetshire; and being led by the

chase near Corfe-castle, where Elfrida resided, he took the

opportunity of paying her a visit, unattended by any of his retinue,

and he thereby presented her with the opportunity which she had long

wished for. After he had mounted his horse, he desired some liquor to

be brought him: while he was holding the cup to his head, a servant of

Elfrida approached him, and gave him a stab behind. The prince,

finding himself wounded, put spurs to his horse; but becoming faint by

loss of blood, he fell from the saddle, his foot stuck in the stirrup,

and he was dragged along by his unruly horse till he expired. Being

tracked by the blood, his body was found, and was privately interred

at Wareham by his servants.

[FN [b] Chron. Sax. p. 124.]

The youth and innocence of this prince, with his tragical death, begat

such compassion among the people, that they believed miracles to be

wrought at his tomb; and they give him the appellation of Martyr,

though his murder had no connexion with any religious principle or

opinion. Elfrida built monasteries, and performed many penances, in

order to atone for her guilt; but could never, by all her hypocrisy or

remorses, recover the good opinion of the public, though so easily

deluded in those ignorant ages.

The History of England, Volume I From the Invasion of Julius Caesar to the Revolution in 1688 · 第 4 / 17 章