Section. 10. No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or

Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit

Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in

Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law

impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.

No State shall, without the Consent of the Congress, lay any Imposts or

Duties on Imports or Exports, except what may be absolutely necessary

for executing it's inspection Laws: and the net Produce of all Duties

and Imposts, laid by any State on Imports or Exports, shall be for the

Use of the Treasury of the United States; and all such Laws shall be

subject to the Revision and Controul of the Congress.

No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of

Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any

Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or

engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as

will not admit of delay.

Article. II.

Section. 1. The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the

United States of America. He shall hold his Office during the Term of

four Years, and, together with the Vice President, chosen for the same

Term, be elected, as follows

Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may

direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and

Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but

no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or

Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.

The Electors shall meet in their respective States, and vote by Ballot

for two Persons, of whom one at least shall not be an Inhabitant of the

same State with themselves. And they shall make a List of all the

Persons voted for, and of the Number of Votes for each; which List they

shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the Seat of the

Government of the United States, directed to the President of the

Senate. The President of the Senate shall, in the Presence of the Senate

and House of Representatives, open all the Certificates, and the Votes

shall then be counted. The Person having the greatest Number of Votes

shall be the President, if such Number be a Majority of the whole Number

of Electors appointed; and if there be more than one who have such

Majority, and have an equal Number of Votes, then the House of

Representatives shall immediately chuse by Ballot one of them for

President; and if no Person have a Majority, then from the five highest

on the List the said House shall in like Manner chuse the President. But

in chusing the President, the Votes shall be taken by States, the

Representation from each State having one Vote; a quorum for this

Purpose shall consist of a Member or Members from two thirds of the

States, and a Majority of all the States shall be necessary to a Choice.

In every Case, after the Choice of the President, the Person having the

greatest Number of Votes of the Electors shall be the Vice President.

But if there should remain two or more who have equal Votes, the Senate

shall chuse from them by Ballot the Vice President.

The Congress may determine the Time of chusing the Electors, and the Day

on which they shall give their Votes; which Day shall be the same

throughout the United States.

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United

States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be

eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be

eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty

five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

In Case of the Removal of the President from Office, or of his Death,

Resignation, or Inability to discharge the Powers and Duties of the said

Office, the Same shall devolve on the Vice President, and the Congress

may by Law provide for the Case of Removal, Death, Resignation or

Inability, both of the President and Vice President, declaring what

Officer shall then act as President, and such Officer shall act

accordingly, until the Disability be removed, or a President shall be

elected.

The President shall, at stated Times, receive for his Services, a

Compensation, which shall neither be encreased nor diminished during the

Period for which he shall have been elected, and he shall not receive

within that Period any other Emolument from the United States, or any of

them.

Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the

following Oath or Affirmation:--"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I

will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States,

and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the

Constitution of the United States."

Section. 2. The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and

Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States,

when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require

the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the

executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their

respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and

Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of

Impeachment.

He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate,

to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur;

and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the

Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls,

Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United

States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and

which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the

Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the

President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.

The President shall have Power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen

during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall

expire at the End of their next Session.

Section. 3. He shall from time to time give to the Congress Information

of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such

Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on

extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in

Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of

Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper;

he shall receive Ambassadors and other public Ministers; he shall take

Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall Commission all the

Officers of the United States.

Section. 4. The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the

United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and

Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

Article. III.

Section. 1. The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in

one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from

time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and

inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and

shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation,

which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.

Section. 2. The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and

Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States,

and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;--to

all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;--to

all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;--to Controversies to

which the United States shall be a Party;--to Controversies between two

or more States;--between a State and Citizens of another State;--between

Citizens of different States;--between Citizens of the same State

claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or

the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.

In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls,

and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have

original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the

supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and

Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress

shall make.

The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by

Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes

shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the

Trial shall be at such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have

directed.

Section. 3. Treason against the United States, shall consist only in

levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them

Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the

Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in

open Court.

The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but

no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture

except during the Life of the Person attainted.

Article. IV.

Section 1. Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the

public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State. And

the Congress may by general Laws prescribe the Manner in which such

Acts, Records and Proceedings shall be proved, and the Effect thereof.

Section 2. The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all

Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who

shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on Demand

of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered

up, to be removed to the State having Jurisdiction of the Crime.

No Person held to Service or Labour in one State, under the Laws

thereof, escaping into another, shall, in Consequence of any Law or

Regulation therein, be discharged from such Service or Labour, but shall

be delivered up on Claim of the Party to whom such Service or Labour may

be due.

Section. 3. New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union;

but no new State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of

any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more

States, or Parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of

the States concerned as well as of the Congress.

The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules

and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to

the United States; and nothing in this Constitution shall be so

construed as to Prejudice any Claims of the United States, or of any

particular State.

Section. 4. The United States shall guarantee to every State in this

Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them

against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the

Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic

Violence.

Article. V.

The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it

necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the

Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States,

shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case,

shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this

Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the

several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one

or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress;

Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One

thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first

and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that

no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of it's equal Suffrage

in the Senate.

Article. VI.

All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption

of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under

this Constitution, as under the Confederation.

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made

in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made,

under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of

the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any

Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary

notwithstanding.

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of

the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers,

both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by

Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test

shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust

under the United States.

Article. VII.

The Ratification of the Conventions of nine States, shall be sufficient

for the Establishment of this Constitution between the States so

ratifying the Same.

[Sidenote: The Word, "the," being interlined between the seventh and

eighth Lines of the first Page, The Word "Thirty" being partly written

on an Erazure in the fifteenth Line of the first Page, The Words "is

tried" being interlined between the thirty second and thirty third Lines

of the first Page and the Word "the" being interlined between the forty

third and forty fourth Lines of the second Page.

Attest William Jackson Secretary]

done in Convention by the Unanimous Consent of the States present the

Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven

hundred and Eighty seven and of the Independence of the United States of

America the Twelfth In witness whereof We have hereunto subscribed our

Names,

Go Washington--Presidt

and deputy from Virginia

New Hampshire { John Langdon

{ Nicholas Gilman

Massachusetts { Nathaniel Gorham

{ Rufus King

Connecticut { Wm: Saml. Johnson

{ Roger Sherman

New York : : : Alexander Hamilton

{ Wil: Livingston

New Jersey { David Brearley.

{ Wm. Paterson.

{ Jona: Dayton

{ B Franklin

{ Thomas Mifflin

{ Robt Morris

Pennsylvania { Geo. Clymer

{ Thos. FitzSimons

{ Jared Ingersoll

{ James Wilson

{ Gouv Morris

{ Geo: Read

{ Gunning Bedford jun

Delaware { John Dickinson

{ Richard Bassett

{ Jaco: Broom

{ James McHenry

Maryland { Dan of St Thos. Jenifer

{ Danl Carroll

Virginia { John Blair--

{ James Madison Jr.

{ Wm. Blount

North Carolina { Richd. Dobbs Spaight.

{ Hu Williamson

{ J. Rutledge

South Carolina { Charles Cotesworth Pinckney

{ Charles Pinckney

{ Pierce Butler

Georgia { William Few

{ Abr Baldwin

* * * * *

In Convention Monday, September 17th 1787.

Present

The States of

New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Mr. Hamilton from New York,

New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina,

South Carolina and Georgia.

Resolved,

That the preceeding Constitution be laid before the United States in

Congress assembled, and that it is the Opinion of this Convention, that

it should afterwards be submitted to a Convention of Delegates, chosen

in each State by the People thereof, under the Recommendation of its

Legislature, for their Assent and Ratification; and that each Convention

assenting to, and ratifying the Same, should give Notice thereof to the

United States in Congress assembled. Resolved, That it is the Opinion of

this Convention, that as soon as the Conventions of nine States shall

have ratified this Constitution, the United States in Congress assembled

should fix a Day on which Electors should be appointed by the States

which shall have ratified the same, and a Day on which the Electors

should assemble to vote for the President, and the Time and Place for

commencing Proceedings under this Constitution. That after such

Publication the Electors should be appointed, and the Senators and

Representatives elected: That the Electors should meet on the Day fixed

for the Election of the President, and should transmit their Votes

certified, signed, sealed and directed, as the Constitution requires, to

the Secretary of the United States in Congress assembled, that the

Senators and Representatives should convene at the Time and Place

assigned; that the Senators should appoint a President of the Senate,

for the sole Purpose of receiving, opening and counting the Votes for

President; and, that after he shall be chosen, the Congress, together

with the President, should, without Delay, proceed to execute this

Constitution.

By the Unanimous Order of the Convention

Go. Washington Presidt

W. Jackson Secretary.

AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

ARTICLES IN ADDITION TO, AND AMENDMENT OF, THE CONSTITUTION OF THE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PROPOSED BY CONGRESS, AND RATIFIED BY THE

SEVERAL STATES, PURSUANT TO THE FIFTH ARTICLE OF THE ORIGINAL

CONSTITUTION.[a]

Amendment [I.][b]

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or

prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of

speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to

assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Amendment [II.]

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free

State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be

infringed.

Amendment [III.]

No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without

the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be

prescribed by law.

Amendment [IV.]

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers,

and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be

violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause,

supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place

to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Amendment [V.]

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous

crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in

cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in

actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be

subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or

limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness

against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without

due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use,

without just compensation.

Amendment [VI.]

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a

speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district

wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have

been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and

cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against

him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor,

and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

Amendment [VII.]

In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed

twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no

fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the

United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

Amendment [VIII.]

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor

cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

Amendment [IX.]

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be

construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Amendment [X.]

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor

prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively,

or to the people.

Amendment [XI.][c]

The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend

to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the

United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects

of any Foreign State.

Amendment [XII.][d]

The Electors shall meet in their respective states and vote by ballot

for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an

inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their

ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the

person voted for as Vice-President, and they shall make distinct lists

of all persons voted for as President, and of all persons voted for as

Vice-President, and of the number of votes for each, which lists they

shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the

government of the United States, directed to the President of the

Senate;--The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the

Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the

votes shall then be counted;--The person having the greatest number of

votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a

majority of the whole number of Electors appointed; and if no person

have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not

exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House

of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President.

But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the

representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this

purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the

states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice.

And if the House of Representatives shall not choose a President

whenever the right of choice shall devolve upon them, before the fourth

day of March next following, then the Vice-President shall act as

President, as in the case of the death or other constitutional

disability of the President--The person having the greatest number of

votes as Vice-President, shall be the Vice-President, if such number be

a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed, and if no person

have a majority, then from the two highest numbers on the list, the

Senate shall choose the Vice-President; a quorum for the purpose shall

consist of two-thirds of the whole number of Senators, and a majority of

the whole number shall be necessary to a choice. But no person

constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible

to that of Vice-President of the United States.

Amendment XIII.[e]

Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as

a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted,

shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their

jurisdiction.

Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by

appropriate legislation.

Amendment XIV.[f]

Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States

and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United

States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or

enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of

citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of

life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any

person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Section 2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the

several States according to their respective numbers, counting the

whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But

when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for

President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in

Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members

of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of

such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United

States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion,

or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in

the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the

whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.

Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in

Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any

office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State,

who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an

officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature,

or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the

Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or

rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies

thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove

such disability.

Section 4. The validity of the public debt of the United

States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of

pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or

rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor

any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of

insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for

the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations

and claims shall be held illegal and void.

Section 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by

appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

Amendment XV.[g]

Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote

shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on

account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.

Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this

article by appropriate legislation.

Amendment XVI.[h]

The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from

whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States,

and without regard to any census or enumeration.

Amendment [XVII.][i]

The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from

each State, elected by the people thereof, for six years; and each

Senator shall have one vote. The electors in each State shall have the

qualifications requisite for electors of the most numerous branch of the

State legislatures.

When vacancies happen in the representation of any State in the Senate,

the executive authority of such State shall issue writs of election to

fill such vacancies: _Provided_, That the legislature of any State may

empower the executive thereof to make temporary appointments until the

people fill the vacancies by election as the legislature may direct.

This amendment shall not be so construed as to affect the election or

term of any Senator chosen before it becomes valid as part of the

Constitution.

Amendment [XVIII.][j]

Section 1. After one year from the ratification of this article

the manufacture, sale, or transportation of intoxicating liquors within,

the importation thereof into, or the exportation thereof from the United

States and all territory subject to the jurisdiction thereof for

beverage purposes is hereby prohibited.

Sec. 2. The Congress and the several States shall have

concurrent power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

Sec. 3. This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have

been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of

the several States, as provided in the Constitution, within seven years

from the date of the submission hereof to the States by the Congress.

Amendment [XIX.][k]

The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied

or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.

Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate

legislation.

Amendment [XX.][l]

Section 1. The terms of the President and Vice President shall

end at noon on the 20th day of January, and the terms of Senators and

Representatives at noon on the 3d day of January, of the years in which

such terms would have ended if this article had not been ratified; and

the terms of their successors shall then begin.

Sec. 2. The Congress shall assemble at least once in every

year, and such meeting shall begin at noon on the 3d day of January,

unless they shall by law appoint a different day.

Sec. 3. If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of

the President, the President elect shall have died, the Vice President

elect shall become President. If a President shall not have been chosen

before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President

elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall

act as President until a President shall have qualified; and the

Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President

elect nor a Vice President elect shall have qualified, declaring who

shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act

shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a

President or Vice President shall have qualified.

Sec. 4. The Congress may by law provide for the case of the

death of any of the persons from whom the House of Representatives may

choose a President whenever the right of choice shall have devolved upon

them, and for the case of the death of any of the persons from whom the

Senate may choose a Vice President whenever the right of choice shall

have devolved upon them.

Sec. 5. Sections 1 and 2 shall take effect on the 15th day of

October following the ratification of this article.

Sec. 6. This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have

been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of

three-fourths of the several States within seven years from the date of

its submission.

Amendment [XXI.][m]

Section 1. The eighteenth article of amendment to the

Constitution of the United States is hereby repealed.

Sec. 2. The transportation or importation into any State,

Territory, or possession of the United States for delivery or use

therein of intoxicating liquors, in violation of the laws thereof, is

hereby prohibited.

Sec. 3. This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have

been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by conventions in the

several States, as provided in the Constitution, within seven years from

the date of the submission hereof to the States by the Congress.

Amendment [XXII.][n]

Section 1. No person shall be elected to the office of the

President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of

President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to

which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the

office of the President more than once. But this Article shall not apply

to any person holding the office of President when this Article was

proposed by the Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be

holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term

within which this Article becomes operative from holding the office of

President or acting as President during the remainder of such term.

Section 2. This Article shall be inoperative unless it shall

have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the

legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years

from the date of its submission to the States by the Congress.

Notes

[a] In Dillon _v._ Gloss, 256 U.S. 368 [1921], the Supreme Court stated

that it would take Judicial notice of the date on which a State ratified

a proposed constitutional amendment. Accordingly the Court consulted the

State Journals to determine the dates on which each house of the

legislature of certain States ratified the 18th Amendment. It,

therefore, follows that the date on which the governor approved the

ratification, or the date on which the secretary of state of a given

State certified the ratification, or the date on which the Secretary of

State of the United States received a copy of said certificate, or the

date on which he proclaimed that the amendment had been ratified are not

controlling. Hence, the ratification date given in the following notes

is the date on which the legislature of a given State approved the

particular amendment (signature by the speaker or presiding officers of

both houses being considered a part of the ratification of the

"legislature"). When that date is not available, the date given is that

on which it was approved by the governor or certified by the secretary

of state of the particular State. In each case such fact has been noted.

Except as otherwise indicated information as to ratification is based on

data supplied by the Department of State.

[b] Brackets enclosing an amendment number indicate that the number was

not specifically assigned in the resolution proposing the amendment. It

will be seen, accordingly, that only amendments XIII, XIV, XV and XVI

were thus technically ratified by number. The first 10 amendments along

with 2 others which failed of ratification were proposed by Congress on

September 25, 1789, when they passed the Senate [1 Ann. Cong. (1st

Cong., 1st sess.) 90], having previously passed the House on September

24 [_Id._, 948]. They appear officially in 1 Stat. 97. Ratification was

completed on December 15, 1791, when the eleventh State (Virginia)

approved these amendments, there being then 14 States in the Union.

The several State legislatures ratified the first 10 amendments to the

Constitution (i.e. nos. 3 to 12 of those proposed) on the following

dates: New Jersey, November 20, 1789; Maryland, December 19, 1789; North

Carolina, December 22, 1789; South Carolina, January 19, 1790; New

Hampshire, January 25, 1790; Delaware, January 28, 1790; New York,

February 27, 1790; Pennsylvania, March 10, 1790; Rhode Island, June 7,

1790; Vermont, November 3, 1791; Virginia, December 15, 1791. The two

amendments which failed of ratification (i.e. nos. 1 and 2 of those

proposed) prescribed the ratio of representation to population in the

House, and specified that no law varying the compensation of members of

Congress should be effective until after an intervening election of

Representatives. The first was ratified by 10 States (1 short of the

requisite number) and the second by 6 States [2 Doc. Hist. Const.,

325-390].

[c] The 11th Amendment was proposed by Congress on March 4, 1794, when

it passed the House [4 Ann. Cong. (3d Cong., 1st sess.) 477, 478],

having previously passed the Senate on January 14 [_Id._, 30, 31]. It

appears officially in 1 Stat. 402. Ratification was completed on

February 7, 1795, when the twelfth State (North Carolina) approved the

amendment, there being then 15 States in the Union. Official

announcement of ratification was not made until January 8, 1798, when

President John Adams in a message to Congress stated that the 11th

Amendment had been adopted by three-fourths of the States and that it

"may now be deemed to be a part of the Constitution" [1 Mess. and Papers

of Pres. 250]. In the interim South Carolina had ratified, and Tennessee

had been admitted into the Union as the Sixteenth State.

The several State legislatures ratified the 11th Amendment on the

following dates: New York, March 27, 1794; Rhode Island, March 31, 1794;

Connecticut, May 8, 1794; New Hampshire, June 16, 1794; Massachusetts,

June 26, 1794; Vermont, between October 9 and November 9, 1794;

Virginia, November 18, 1794; Georgia, November 29, 1794; Kentucky,

December 7, 1794; Maryland, December 26, 1794; Delaware, January 23,

1795; North Carolina, February 7, 1795; South Carolina, December 4, 1797

[State Department, Press Releases, vol. XII, p. 247 (1935)].

[d] The 12th Amendment was proposed by Congress on December 9, 1803,

when it passed the House [13 Ann. Cong. (8th Cong., 1st sess.) 775,

776], having previously passed the Senate on December 2 [_Id._, 209]. It

was not signed by the presiding officers of the House and Senate until

December 12. It appears officially in 2 Stat. 306. Ratification was

probably completed on June 15, 1804, when the legislature of the

thirteenth State (New Hampshire) approved the amendment, there being

then 17 States in the Union. The Governor of New Hampshire, however,

vetoed this act of the legislature on June 20, and the act failed to

pass again by two-thirds vote then required by the State constitution.

Inasmuch as art. V of the Federal Constitution specifies that amendments

shall become effective "when ratified by the legislatures of

three-fourths of the several States or by conventions in three-fourths

thereof," it has been generally believed that an approval or veto by a

governor is without significance. If the ratification by New Hampshire

be deemed ineffective, then the amendment became operative by

Tennessee's ratification on July 27, 1804. On September 25, 1804, in a

circular letter to the Governors of the several States, Secretary of

State Madison declared the amendment ratified by three-fourths of the

States.

The several State legislatures ratified the 12th Amendment on the

following dates: North Carolina, December 22, 1803; Maryland, December

24, 1803; Kentucky, December 27, 1803; Ohio, between December 5 and

December 30, 1803; Virginia, between December 20, 1803 and February 3,

1804; Pennsylvania, January 5, 1804; Vermont, January 30, 1804; New

York, February 10, 1804; New Jersey, February 22, 1804; Rhode Island,

between February 27 and March 12, 1804; South Carolina, May 15, 1804;

Georgia, May 19, 1804; New Hampshire, June 15, 1804; and Tennessee, July

27, 1804. The amendment was rejected by Delaware on January 18, 1804,

and by Connecticut at its session begun May 10, 1804.

[e] The 13th Amendment was proposed by Congress on January 31, 1865,

when it passed the House [Cong. Globe (38th Cong., 2d sess.) 531],

having previously passed the Senate on April 8, 1864 [_Id._ (38th Cong.,

1st sess.) 1490]. It appears officially in 13 Stat. 567 under the date

of February 1, 1865. Ratification was completed on December 6, 1865,

when the legislature of the twenty-seventh State (Georgia) approved the

amendment, there being then 36 States in the Union. On December 18,

1865, Secretary of State Seward certified that the 13th Amendment had

become a part of the Constitution [13 Stat. 774].

The several State legislatures ratified the 13th Amendment on the

following dates: Illinois, February 1, 1865; Rhode Island, February, 2,

1865; Michigan, February 2, 1865; Maryland, February 3, 1865; New York,

February 3, 1865; West Virginia, February 3, 1865; Missouri, February 6,

1865; Maine, February 7, 1865; Kansas, February 7, 1865; Massachusetts,

February 7, 1865; Pennsylvania, February 8, 1865; Virginia, February 9,

1865; Ohio, February 10, 1865; Louisiana, February 15 or 16, 1865;

Indiana, February 16, 1865; Nevada, February 16, 1865; Minnesota,

February 23, 1865; Wisconsin, February 24, 1865; Vermont, March 9, 1865

(date on which it was "approved" by Governor); Tennessee, April 7, 1865;

Arkansas, April 14, 1865; Connecticut, May 4, 1865; New Hampshire, June

30, 1865; South Carolina, November 13, 1865; Alabama, December 2, 1865

(date on which it was "approved" by Provisional Governor); North

Carolina, December 4, 1865; Georgia, December 6, 1865; Oregon, December

11, 1865; California, December 15, 1865; Florida, December 28, 1865

(Florida again ratified this amendment on June 9, 1868, upon its

adoption of a new constitution); Iowa, January 17, 1866; New Jersey,

January 23, 1866 (after having rejected the amendment on March 16,

1865); Texas, February 18, 1870; Delaware, February 12, 1901 (after

having rejected the amendment on February 8, 1865). The amendment was

rejected by Kentucky on February 24, 1865, and by Mississippi on

December 2, 1865.

"A thirteenth amendment depriving of United States citizenship any

citizen who should accept any title, office, or emolument from a foreign

power, was proposed by Congress on May 1, 1810, when it passed the House

[21 Ann. Cong. (11th Cong., 2d sess.) 2050], having previously passed

the Senate on April 27 [20 Ann. Cong. (11th Cong., 2d sess.) 672]. It

appears officially in 2 Stat. 613. It failed of adoption, being ratified

by but 12 States up to December 10, 1812 [2 Miscell. Amer. State Papers,

477-479; 2 Doc. Hist. Const. 454-499], there then being 18 in all.

"Another thirteenth amendment, forbidding any future amendment that

should empower Congress to interfere with the domestic institutions of

any State, was proposed by Congress on March 2, 1861, when it passed the

Senate [Cong. Globe (36th Cong., 2d sess.) 1403], having previously

passed the House on February 28 [_Id._, 1285]. It appears officially in

12 Stat. 251. It failed of adoption, being ratified by but three States:

Ohio, May 13, 1861 [58 Laws Ohio, 190]; Maryland, January 10, 1862 [Laws

Maryland (1861-62) 21]; Illinois, February 14, 1862 [2 Doc. Hist.

Const., 518] irregular, because by convention instead of by legislation

as authorized by Congress." [Burdick, The Law of the American

Constitution, 637.]

[f] The 14th Amendment was proposed by Congress on June 13, 1866, when

it passed the House [Cong. Globe (39th Cong., 1st sess.) 3148, 3149],

having previously passed the Senate on June 8 [_Id._, 3042]. It appears

officially in 14 Stat. 358 under date of June 16, 1866. Ratification was

probably completed on July 9, 1868, when the legislature of the

twenty-eighth State (South Carolina or Louisiana) approved the

amendment, there being then 37 States in the Union. However, Ohio and

New Jersey had prior to that date "withdrawn" their earlier assent to

this amendment. Accordingly, Secretary of State Seward on July 20, 1868,

certified that the amendment had become a part of the Constitution if

the said withdrawals were ineffective [15 Stat. 706-707]. Congress at

once (July 21, 1868) passed a joint resolution declaring the amendment a

part of the Constitution and directing the Secretary to promulgate it as

such. On July 28, 1868, Secretary Seward certified without reservation

that the amendment was a part of the Constitution. In the interim, two

other States, Alabama on July 13 and Georgia on July 21, 1868, had added

their ratifications.

The several State legislatures ratified the 14th Amendment on the

following dates: Connecticut, June 30, 1866; New Hampshire, July 7,

1866; Tennessee, July 19, 1866; New Jersey, September 11, 1866 (the New

Jersey Legislature on February 20, 1868 "withdrew" its consent to the

ratification; the Governor vetoed that bill on March 5, 1868; and it was

repassed over his veto on March 24, 1868); Oregon, September 19, 1866

(Oregon "withdrew" its consent on October 15, 1868); Vermont, October

30, 1866; New York, January 10, 1867; Ohio, January 11, 1867 (Ohio

"withdrew" its consent on January 15, 1868); Illinois, January 15, 1867;

West Virginia, January 16, 1867; Michigan, January 16, 1867; Kansas,

January 17, 1867; Minnesota, January 17, 1867; Maine, January 19, 1867;

Nevada, January 22, 1867; Indiana, January 23, 1867; Missouri, January

26, 1867 (date on which it was certified by the Missouri secretary of

state); Rhode Island, February 7, 1867; Pennsylvania, February 12, 1867;

Wisconsin, February 13, 1867 (actually passed February 7, but not signed

by legislative officers until February 13); Massachusetts, March 20,

1867; Nebraska, June 15, 1867; Iowa, March 9, 1868; Arkansas, April 6,

1868; Florida, June 9, 1868; North Carolina, July 2, 1868 (after having

rejected the amendment on December 13, 1866); Louisiana, July 9, 1868

(after having rejected the amendment on February 6, 1867); South

Carolina, July 8, 1868; (after having rejected the amendment on December

20, 1866); Alabama, July 13, 1868 (date on which it was "approved" by

the Governor); Georgia, July 21, 1868 (after having rejected the

amendment on November 9, 1866--Georgia ratified again on February 2,

1870); Virginia, October 8, 1869 (after having rejected the amendment on

January 9, 1867); Mississippi, January 17, 1870; Texas, February 18,

1870 (after having rejected the amendment on October 27, 1866);

Delaware, February 12, 1901 (after having rejected the amendment on

February 7, 1867). The amendment was rejected (and not subsequently

ratified) by Kentucky on January 8, 1807, and by Maryland on March 23,

1867.

[g] The 15th Amendment was proposed by Congress on February 26, 1869,

when it passed the Senate [Cong. Globe (40th Cong., 3rd sess.) 1641],

having previously passed the House on February 25 [_Id._ 1563, 1564]. It

appears officially in 15 Stat. 346 under date of February 27, 1869.

Ratification was probably completed on February 3, 1870, when the

legislature of the twenty-eighth State (Iowa) approved the amendment,

there being then 37 States in the Union. However, New York had prior to

that date "withdrawn" its earlier assent to this amendment. Even if this

withdrawal were effective, Nebraska's ratification on February 17, 1870,

authorized Secretary of State Fish's certification of March 30, 1870,

that the 15th Amendment had become a part of the Constitution [16 Stat

1131].

The several State legislatures ratified the 15th Amendment on the

following dates: Nevada, March 1, 1869; West Virginia, March 3, 1869;

North Carolina, March 5, 1869; Louisiana, March 5, 1869 (date on which

it was "approved" by the Governor); Illinois March 5, 1869; Michigan,

March 5, 1869; Wisconsin, March 5, 1869; Maine, March 11, 1869;

Massachusetts, March 12, 1869; South Carolina, March 15, 1869; Arkansas,

March 15, 1869; Pennsylvania, March 25, 1869; New York, April 14, 1869

(New York "withdrew" its consent to the ratification on January 5,

1870); Indiana, May 14, 1869; Connecticut, May 19, 1869; Florida, June

14, 1869; New Hampshire, July 1, 1869; Virginia, October 8, 1869;

Vermont, October 20, 1869; Alabama, November 16, 1869; Missouri, January

7, 1870 (Missouri had ratified the first section of the 15th Amendment

on March 1, 1869; it failed to include in its ratification the second

section of the amendment); Minnesota, January 13, 1870; Mississippi,

January 17, 1870; Rhode Island, January 18, 1870; Kansas, January 19,

1870 (Kansas had by a defectively worded resolution previously ratified

this amendment on February 27, 1869); Ohio, January 27, 1870 (after

having rejected the amendment on May 4, 1869); Georgia, February 2,

1870; Iowa, February 3, 1870; Nebraska, February 17, 1870; Texas,

February 18, 1870; New Jersey, February 15, 1871 (after having rejected

the amendment on February 7, 1870); Delaware, February 12, 1901 (date on

which approved by Governor; Delaware had previously rejected the

amendment on March 18, 1869). The amendment was rejected (and not

subsequently ratified) by California, Kentucky, Maryland, Oregon, and

Tennessee.

[h] The 16th Amendment was proposed by Congress on July 12, 1909, when

it passed the House [44 Cong. Rec. (61st Cong., 1st sess.) 4390, 4440,

4441], having previously passed the Senate on July 5 [_Id._, 4121]. It

appears officially in 36 Stat 184. Ratification was completed on

February 3, 1913, when the legislature of the thirty-sixth State

(Delaware, Wyoming, or New Mexico) approved the amendment, there being

then 48 States in the Union. On February 25, 1913, Secretary of State

Knox certified that this amendment had become a part of the Constitution

[37 Stat. 1785].

The several State legislatures ratified the 16th Amendment on the

following dates: Alabama, August 10, 1909; Kentucky, February 8, 1910;

South Carolina, February 19, 1910; Illinois, March 1, 1910; Mississippi,

March 7, 1910; Oklahoma, March 10, 1910; Maryland, April 8, 1910;

Georgia, August 3, 1910; Texas, August 16, 1910; Ohio, January 19, 1911;

Idaho, January 20, 1911; Oregon, January 23, 1911; Washington, January

26, 1911; Montana, January 27, 1911; Indiana, January 30, 1911;

California, January 31, 1911; Nevada, January 31, 1911; South Dakota,

February 1, 1911; Nebraska, February 9, 1911; North Carolina, February

11, 1911; Colorado, February 15, 1911; North Dakota, February 17, 1911;

Michigan, February 23, 1911; Iowa, February 24, 1911; Kansas, March 2,

1911; Missouri, March 16, 1911; Maine, March 31, 1911; Tennessee, April

7, 1911; Arkansas, April 22, 1911 (after having rejected the amendment

at the session begun January 9, 1911); Wisconsin, May 16, 1911; New

York, July 12, 1911; Arizona, April 3, 1912; Minnesota, June 11, 1912;

Louisiana, June 28, 1912; West Virginia, January 31, 1913; Delaware,

February 3, 1913; Wyoming, February 3, 1913; New Mexico, February 3,

1913; New Jersey, February 4, 1913; Vermont, February 19, 1913;

Massachusetts, March 4, 1913; New Hampshire, March 7, 1913 (after having

rejected the amendment on March 2, 1911). The amendment was rejected

(and not subsequently ratified) by Connecticut, Rhode Island, and Utah.

[i] The 17th Amendment was proposed by Congress on May 13, 1912, when it

passed the House [48 Cong. Rec. (62d Cong., 2d sess.) 6367], having

previously passed the Senate on June 12, 1911 [47 Cong. Rec. (62d Cong.

1st sess.) 1925]. It appears officially in 37 Stat. 646. Ratification

was completed on April 8, 1913, when the thirty-sixth State

(Connecticut) approved the amendment, there being then 48 States in the

Union. On May 31, 1913, Secretary of State Bryan certified that it had

become a part of the Constitution [38 Stat. 2049].

The several State legislatures ratified the 17th Amendment on the

following dates: Massachusetts, May 22, 1912; Arizona, June 3, 1912;

Minnesota, June 10, 1912; New York, January 15, 1913; Kansas, January

17, 1913; Oregon, January 23, 1913; North Carolina, January 25, 1913;

California, January 28, 1913; Michigan, January 28, 1913; Iowa, January

30, 1913; Montana, January 30, 1913; Idaho, January 31, 1913; West

Virginia, February 4, 1913; Colorado, February 5, 1913; Nevada, February

6, 1913; Texas, February 7, 1913; Washington, February 7, 1913; Wyoming,

February 8, 1913; Arkansas, February 11, 1913; Illinois, February 13,

1913; North Dakota, February 14, 1913; Wisconsin, February 18, 1913;

Indiana, February 19, 1913; New Hampshire, February 19, 1913; Vermont,

February 19, 1913; South Dakota, February 19, 1913; Maine, February 20,

1913; Oklahoma, February 24, 1913; Ohio, February 25, 1913; Missouri,

March 7, 1913; New Mexico, March 13, 1913; Nebraska, March 14, 1913; New

Jersey, March 17, 1913; Tennessee, April 1, 1913; Pennsylvania, April 2,

1913; Connecticut, April 8, 1913; Louisiana, June 5, 1914. The amendment

was rejected by Utah on February 26, 1913.

[j] The 18th Amendment was proposed by Congress on December 18, 1917,

when it passed the Senate [Cong. Rec. (65th Cong., 2d sess.) 478],

having previously passed the House on December 17 [_Id._, 470]. It

appears officially in 40 Stat 1050. Ratification was completed on

January 16, 1919, when the thirty-sixth State approved the amendment,

there being then 48 States in the Union. On January 29, 1919, Acting

Secretary of State Polk certified that this amendment had been adopted

by the requisite number of States [40 Stat. 1941]. By its terms this

amendment did not became effective until 1 year after ratification.

The several State legislatures ratified the 18th Amendment on the

following dates: Mississippi, January 8, 1918; Virginia, January 11,

1918; Kentucky, January 14, 1918; North Dakota, January 28, 1918 (date

on which approved by Governor); South Carolina, January 29, 1918;

Maryland, February 13, 1918; Montana, February 19, 1918; Texas, March 4,

1918; Delaware, March 18, 1918; South Dakota, March 20, 1918;

Massachusetts, April 2, 1918; Arizona, May 24, 1918; Georgia, June 26,

1918; Louisiana, August 9, 1918 (date on which approved by Governor);

Florida, November 27, 1918; Michigan, January 2, 1919; Ohio, January 7,

1919; Oklahoma, January 7, 1919; Idaho, January 8, 1919; Maine, January

8, 1919; West Virginia, January 13, 1919; California, January 13, 1919;

Tennessee, January 13, 1919; Washington, January 13, 1919; Arkansas,

January 14, 1919; Kansas, January 14, 1919; Illinois, January 14, 1919;

Indiana, January 14, 1919; Alabama, January 15, 1919; Colorado, January

15, 1919; Iowa, January 15, 1919; New Hampshire, January 15, 1919;

Oregon, January 15, 1919; Nebraska, January 16, 1919; North Carolina,

January 16, 1919; Utah, January 16, 1919; Missouri, January 16, 1919;

Wyoming, January 16, 1919; Minnesota, January 17, 1919; Wisconsin,

January 17, 1919; New Mexico, January 20, 1919; Nevada, January 21,

1919; Pennsylvania, February 25, 1919; Connecticut, May 6, 1919; New

Jersey, March 9, 1922; New York, January 29, 1919; Vermont, January 29,

1919.

[k] The 19th Amendment was proposed by Congress on June 4, 1919, when it

passed the Senate [Cong. Rec. (66th Cong., 1st sess.) 635], having

previously passed the House on May 21, [_Id._, 94]. It appears

officially in 41 Stat. 362. Ratification was completed on August 18,

1920, when the thirty-sixth State (Tennessee) approved the amendment,

there being then 48 States in the Union. On August 26, 1920, Secretary

of State Colby certified that it had become a part of the Constitution

[41 Stat. 1823].

The several State legislatures ratified the 19th Amendment on the

following dates: Illinois, June 10, 1919 (readopted June 17, 1919);

Michigan, June 10, 1919; Wisconsin, June 10, 1919; Kansas, June 16,

1919; New York, June 16, 1919; Ohio, June 16, 1919; Pennsylvania, June

24, 1919; Massachusetts, June 25, 1919; Texas, June 28, 1919; Iowa, July

2, 1919 (date on which approved by Governor); Missouri, July 3, 1919;

Arkansas, July 28, 1919; Montana, August 2, 1919 (date on which approved

by Governor); Nebraska, August 2, 1919; Minnesota, September 8, 1919;

New Hampshire, September 10, 1919 (date on which approved by Governor);

Utah, October 2, 1919; California, November 1, 1919; Maine, November 5,

1919; North Dakota, December 1, 1919; South Dakota, December 4, 1919

(date on which certified); Colorado, December 15, 1919 (date on which

approved by Governor); Kentucky, January 6, 1920; Rhode Island, January

6, 1920; Oregon, January 13, 1920; Indiana, January 16, 1920; Wyoming,

January 27, 1920; Nevada, February 7, 1920; New Jersey, February 9,

1920; Idaho, February 11, 1920; Arizona, February 12, 1920; New Mexico,

February 21, 1920 (date on which approved by Governor); Oklahoma,

February 28, 1920; West Virginia, March 10, 1920; Washington, March 22,

1920; Tennessee, August 18, 1920; Connecticut, September 14, 1920

(confirmed September 21, 1920); Vermont, February 8, 1921. The amendment

was rejected by Georgia on July 24, 1919; by Alabama on September 22,

1919; by South Carolina on January 29, 1920; by Virginia on February 12,

1920; by Maryland on February 24, 1920; by Mississippi on March 29,

1920; by Louisiana on July 1, 1920.

[l] The 20th Amendment was proposed by Congress on March 2, 1932, when

it passed the Senate [Cong. Rec. (72d Cong., 1st sess.) 5086], having

previously passed the House on March 1 [_Id._, 5027]. It appears

officially in 47 Stat. 745. Ratification was completed on January 23,

1933, when the thirty-sixth State approved the amendment, there being

then 48 States in the Union. On February 6, 1933, Secretary of State

Stimson certified that it had become a part of the Constitution [47

Stat. 2569].

The several State legislatures ratified the 20th Amendment on the

following dates: Virginia, March 4, 1932; New York, March 11, 1932;

Mississippi, March 16, 1932; Arkansas, March 17, 1932; Kentucky, March

17, 1932; New Jersey, March 21, 1932; South Carolina, March 25, 1932;

Michigan, March 31, 1932; Maine, April 1, 1932; Rhode Island, April 14,

1932; Illinois, April 21, 1932; Louisiana, June 22, 1932; West Virginia,

July 30, 1932; Pennsylvania, August 11, 1932; Indiana, August 15, 1932;

Texas, September 7, 1932; Alabama, September 13, 1932; California,

January 4, 1933; North Carolina, January 5, 1933; North Dakota, January

9, 1933; Minnesota, January 12, 1933; Arizona, January 13, 1933;

Montana, January 13, 1933; Nebraska, January 13, 1933; Oklahoma, January

13, 1933; Kansas, January 16, 1933; Oregon, January 16, 1933; Delaware,

January 19, 1933; Washington, January 19, 1933; Wyoming, January 19,

1933; Iowa, January 20, 1933; South Dakota, January 20, 1933; Tennessee,

January 20, 1933; Idaho, January 21, 1933; New Mexico, January 21, 1933;

Georgia, January 23, 1933; Missouri, January 23, 1933; Ohio, January 23,

1933; Utah, January 23, 1933; Colorado, January 24, 1933; Massachusetts,

January 24, 1933; Wisconsin, January 24, 1933; Nevada, January 26, 1933;

Connecticut, January 27, 1933; New Hampshire, January 31, 1933; Vermont,

February 2, 1933; Maryland, March 24, 1933; Florida, April 26, 1933.

A proposed amendment which would authorize Congress to limit, regulate,

and prohibit the labor of persons under 18 years of age was passed by

Congress on June 2, 1924. This proposal at the time it was submitted to

the States was referred to as "the proposed 20th Amendment." It appears

officially in 43 Stat. 670.

The status of this proposed amendment is a matter of conflicting

opinion. The Kentucky Court of Appeals in Wise _v._ Chandler (270 Ky. 1

[1937]) has held that it is no longer open to ratification because: (1)

Rejected by more than one-fourth of the States; (2) a State may not

reject and then subsequently ratify, at least when more than one-fourth

of the States are on record as rejecting; and (3) more than a reasonable

time has elapsed since it was submitted to the States in 1924. The

Kansas Supreme Court in Coleman _v._ Miller (146 Kan. 390 [1937]) came

to the opposite conclusion.

On October 1, 1937, 27 States had ratified the proposed amendment. Of

these States 10 had previously rejected the amendment on one or more

occasions. At least 26 different States have at one time rejected the

amendment.

[m] The 21st Amendment was proposed by Congress on February 20, 1933,

when it passed the House [Cong. Rec. (72d Cong., 2d sess.) 4516], having

previously passed the Senate on February 16 [_Id._, 4231]. It appears

officially in 47 Stat. 1625. Ratification was completed on December 5,

1933, when the thirty-sixth State (Utah) approved the amendment, there

being then 48 States in the Union. On December 5, 1933, Acting Secretary

of State Phillips certified that it had been adopted by the requisite

number of States [48 Stat. 1749].

The several State conventions ratified the 21st Amendment on the

following dates: Michigan, April 10, 1933; Wisconsin, April 25, 1933;

Rhode Island, May 8, 1933; Wyoming, May 25, 1933; New Jersey, June 1,

1933; Delaware, June 24, 1933; Indiana, June 26, 1933; Massachusetts,

June 26, 1933; New York, June 27, 1933; Illinois, July 10, 1933; Iowa,

July 10, 1933; Connecticut, July 11, 1933; New Hampshire, July 11, 1933;

California, July 24, 1933; West Virginia, July 25, 1933; Arkansas,

August 1, 1933; Oregon, August 7, 1933; Alabama, August 8, 1933;

Tennessee, August 11, 1933; Missouri, August 29, 1933; Arizona,

September 5, 1933; Nevada, September 5, 1933; Vermont, September 23,

1933; Colorado, September 26, 1933; Washington, October 3, 1933;

Minnesota, October 10, 1933; Idaho, October 17, 1933; Maryland, October

18, 1933; Virginia, October 25, 1933; New Mexico, November 2, 1933;

Florida, November 14, 1933; Texas, November 24, 1933; Kentucky, November

27, 1933; Ohio, December 5, 1933; Pennsylvania, December 5, 1933; Utah,

December 5, 1933; Maine, December 6, 1933; Montana, August 6, 1934. The

amendment was rejected by a convention in the State of South Carolina,

on December 4, 1933. The electorate of the State of North Carolina voted

against holding a convention at a general election held on November 7,

1933.

[n] The twenty-second Amendment was proposed by Congress on March 24,

1947, having passed the House on March 21, 1947 [Cong. Rec. (80th Cong.,

1st sess.) 2392] and having previously passed the Senate on March 12,

1947 [Id. 1978]. It appears officially in 61 Stat. 959. Ratification was

completed on February 27, 1951, when the thirty-sixth State (Minnesota)

approved the amendment; there being then 48 States in the Union. On

March 1, 1951, Jess Larson, Administrator of General Services, certified

that it had been adopted by the requisite number of States [16 F.R.

2019].

A total of 41 State legislatures ratified the Twenty-second Amendment on

the following dates: Maine, March 31, 1947; Michigan, March 31, 1947;

Iowa, April 1, 1947; Kansas, April 1, 1947; New Hampshire, April 1,

1947; Delaware, April 2, 1947; Illinois, April 3, 1947; Oregon, April 3,

1947; Colorado, April 12, 1947; California, April 15, 1947; New Jersey,

April 15, 1947; Vermont, April 15, 1947; Ohio, April 16, 1947;

Wisconsin; April 16, 1947; Pennsylvania, April 29, 1947; Connecticut,

May 21, 1947; Missouri, May 22, 1947; Nebraska, May 23, 1947; Virginia,

January 28, 1948; Mississippi, February 12, 1948; New York, March 9,

1948; South Dakota, January 21, 1949; North Dakota, February 25, 1949;

Louisiana, May 17, 1950; Montana, January 25, 1951; Indiana, January 29,

1951; Idaho, January 30, 1951; New Mexico, February 12, 1951; Wyoming,

February 12, 1951; Arkansas, February 15, 1951; Georgia, February 17,

1951; Tennessee, February 20, 1951; Texas, February 22, 1951; Utah,

February 26, 1951; Nevada, February 26, 1951; Minnesota, February 27,

1951; North Carolina, February 28, 1951; South Carolina, March 13, 1951;

Maryland, March 14, 1951; Florida, April 16, 1951; and Alabama, May 4,

1951.

THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WITH ANNOTATIONS

PREAMBLE

The Preamble: Page

Purpose and effect 59

"The people of the United States" 59

THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WITH ANNOTATIONS

The Preamble

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect

Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the

common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of

Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this

Constitution for the United States of America.

Purpose and Effect of the Preamble

Although the preamble is not a source of power for any department of the

Federal Government,[1] the Supreme Court has often referred to it as

evidence of the origin, scope, and purpose of the Constitution. "Its

true office" wrote Joseph Story in his Commentaries, "is to expound the

nature and extent and application of the powers actually conferred by

the Constitution, and not substantively to create them. For example, the

preamble declares one object to be, 'to provide for the common defense.'

No one can doubt that this does not enlarge the powers of Congress to

pass any measures which they deem useful for the common defence. But

suppose the terms of a given power admit of two constructions, the one

more restrictive, the other more liberal, and each of them is consistent

with the words, but is, and ought to be, governed by the intent of the

power; if one could promote and the other defeat the common defence,

ought not the former, upon the soundest principles of interpretation, to

be adopted?"[2] Moreover, the preamble bears witness to the fact that

the Constitution emanated from the people, and was not the act of

sovereign and independent States,[3] and that it was made for, and is

binding only in, the United States of America.[4] In the Dred Scott

case,[5] Chief Justice Taney declared that: "The words 'people of the

United States' and 'citizens' are synonymous terms, and mean the same

thing. They both describe the political body who, according to our

republican institutions, form the sovereignty, and who hold the power

and conduct the Government through their representatives. They are what

we familiarly call the 'sovereign people,' and every citizen is one of

this people, and a constituent member of this sovereignty."[6]

Notes

[1] Jacobson _v._ Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11, 22 (1905).

[2] 1 Story, Commentaries on the Constitution, Sec. 462.

[3] McCulloch _v._ Maryland, 4 Wheat. 316, 403 (1819); Chisholm _v._

Georgia, 2 Dall. 419, 470 (1793); Martin _v._ Hunter, Wheat. 304, 324

(1816).

[4] Downes _v._ Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244, 251 (1901); In re Ross, 140 U.S.

453, 464 (1891).

[5] 19 How. 393 (1857).

[6] Ibid. 404.

ARTICLE I

LEGISLATIVE DEPARTMENT

Section 1. Nature of legislative power: Page

Doctrine of enumerated powers 71

Nondelegability of legislative power 73

Origin of doctrine 73

Functions which may be delegated 74

Power to supplement statutory provisions 74

Standards for administrative action 75

Rule-making power 76

Orders directed to particular persons 77

Delegation to private persons 78

Power to give effect to contingent legislation 79

Modification of tariff laws 79

Arms embargo 80

Internal affairs 80

Emergency statutes 81

Punishment of violations 82

Congressional investigations 82

Investigations in aid of legislation 82

Conduct of executive department 82

Private affairs 83

Purpose of inquiry 84

Judicial functions 85

Sanctions of the investigatory power 85

Contempt 85

Criminal prosecutions 85

Sections 2 and 3. House of Representatives and Senate:

Qualifications of Members of Congress 87

Right to vote for Representatives and Congressional

protection thereof 87

When the qualifications must be possessed 88

Enlargement of qualifications 88

Inability of States to enlarge 89

Census requirement 90

Section 4. Elections and meetings:

Federal legislation under this clause 92

Legislature defined 93

Inequality of election districts 93

Congressional protection of the electoral process 94

Section 5. Powers and duties of the houses:

Power to judge elections 95

Quorum to do business 96

Rules of procedure 96

Powers of the houses over members 97

Duty to keep a journal 98

Section 6. Compensation, immunities, and disabilities of Members:

When the pay starts 99

Privilege from arrest 99

Privilege of speech or debate 99

Incompatible offices 101

Section 7. Legislative process:

Revenue bills 102

Approval by the President 103

Veto power 103

Presentation of resolutions 104

Section 8. Powers of Congress:

Clause 1. Taxing-spending power 105

Kinds of taxes permitted 105

Decline of forbidden subject matter test 105

Rise and fall of Collector _v._ Day 106

Federal taxation of State interests 106

Immunity left to the States 108

Conflicting views on the court 108

Rule of uniformity 109

Purposes of taxation 110

Regulation by taxation 110

Extermination by taxation 110

Protective tariff 112

Spending for the general welfare 112

Hamilton _v._ Madison 113

Triumph of Hamiltonian theory 113

Security Act Cases, The 115

Earmarked funds 116

Conditional grants-in-aid 116

"Debts of the United States" 116

Clause 2. Borrowing power 117

Clause 3. Power to regulate interstate and foreign commerce 118

Purpose of the clause 118

Definition of terms: Gibbons _v._ Ogden 118

"Commerce" 118

"Commerce" today 119

"Necessary and proper" clause 121

"Among the several States" 121

"Regulate" 123

Interstate versus foreign commerce 123

Instruments of commerce 125

Congressional regulation of waterways 126

Navigation 126

Hydroelectric power 130

Congress' jurisdiction over navigable streams today 131

Purposes for which power may be generated 131

Congressional regulation of land transportation 132

Early Acts: Federal provision for highways 132

Beginnings of federal railway regulation 132

Regulation of rates: Interstate Commerce Commission 133

Interstate Commerce Commission today 135

Shreveport Case 135

Act of 1920 and State railway rate regulation 136

Regulation of other agents of carriage and communication 137

Acts of Congress protective of labor engaged in interstate

transportation 139

Adair Case 141

Railroad Retirement Act 142

Bills of Lading: Ferger Case 143

Congressional regulation of commerce as traffic 144

Sherman Act: Sugar Trust Case 144

Sherman Act revised 146

"Current of commerce" concept: Swift Case 147

Danbury Hatters Case 149

Stockyards and Grain Futures Acts 149

Securities and Exchange Commission 150

Congressional regulation of production and industrial

relations 152

Antidepression legislation 152

National Industrial Recovery Act 152

Schechter Case 152

Agricultural Adjustment Act 153

Bituminous Coal Conservation Act 153

National Labor Relations Act 154

Fair Labor Standards Act: Darby Case 155

Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act 159

Acts of Congress prohibiting commerce 160

Foreign commerce; Jefferson's embargo 160

Foreign commerce; protective tariffs 162

Foreign commerce; banned articles 162

Interstate commerce; conflict of doctrine and opinion 163

Acts of Congress prohibitive of commerce 168

Lottery Case 169

National prohibitions and State police power 169

Hammer _v._ Dagenhart 170

Interstate commerce in stolen goods banned 171

Darby Case 172

Congress and the federal system 173

Commerce clause as a restraint on State power 173

Doctrinal background 173

Doctrinal background: Webster's contribution 175

Cooley _v._ Board of Port Wardens 175

Judicial formulas 176

Taxing power of the State and foreign commerce 177

Browne _v._ Maryland: Original package doctrine 177

State taxation of the subject matter of interstate commerce 178

General considerations 178

State Freight Tax Case 179

Goods in transit 180

State taxation of manufacturing and mining 181

Production for an established market 182

Rejection of original package concept in interstate

commerce 182

Inspection charges 183

Local sales: Peddlers 184

Stoppage in transit 185

Drummer Cases; Robbins _v._ Shelby County Taxing

District 186

Limitation of the Robbins Case 187

Robbins Case today 189

Depression Cases: Use taxes 189

Depression Cases: Sales taxes 190

End of the Depression Cases 191

Taxation of carriage of persons 192

State taxation of the interstate commerce privilege:

Foreign Corporations 193

Doctrinal history 193

License taxes 194

Doctrine of Western Union Telegraph _v._ Kansas 196

Spread of the doctrine 196

Status of the doctrine today 197

State taxation of property engaged in, and of the proceeds

from, interstate commerce 198

General issue 198

Development of the apportionment rule 199

Unit rule 200

Apportioned property taxes 201

Apportioned gross receipts taxes 202

Franchise taxes 202

Gross receipts taxes, classes of 203

Multiple taxation test 204

Recent cases 206

Taxes on net income 208

Miscellaneous taxes affecting interstate commerce 209

Vessels 209

Airplanes 210

Motor vehicles 211

Public utilities: Regulatory charges 213

Dominance of Congress 214

McCarran Act: Regulation of insurance 214

Police power and foreign commerce 215

Origin of police power 215

State curbs on entry of foreigners 216

State quarantine laws 217

State game protection and foreign commerce 217

Police power and interstate commerce 217

General principles 217

State regulation of agencies of interstate commerce 220

Railway rate regulation 220

Adequate service regulations 221

Safety and other regulations 221

Invalid State regulations 222

State regulation of length of trains 223

Lesson of Southern Pacific Co. _v._ Arizona 225

State regulation of motor vehicles: Valid regulations 226

Invalid State acts affecting motor carriers 227

Transportation agencies 228

Navigation; general doctrine 228

Bridges, dams, ferries, wharves 230

Ferries 231

Telegraphs and telephones 231

Gas and electricity 233

Foreign corporations 234

Miscellaneous 234

Banks and banking 234

Brokers 235

Commission men 235

Attachment and garnishment 235

Statutory liens 235

Police power and the subject matter of commerce 235

Scope of the police power 235

Quarantine laws 236

State inspection laws 237

State prohibition laws: The original package doctrine 238

Oleomargarine and cigarettes 239

Demise of the original package doctrine 240

Curbs on the interstate movement of persons 241

State conservation and embargo measures 242

State conservation and embargo measures: The Milk Cases 244

State conservation and embargo measures: The Shrimp Cases 245

Concurrent federal and State legislation 246

General issue 246

Hepburn Act 246

Quarantine Cases 248

Recent cases sustaining State legislation 249

Recent cases nullifying State action 250

Federal versus State labor laws 251

Commerce with Indian Tribes 252

United States _v._ Kagama 252

Clause 4. Naturalization and bankruptcies 254

Naturalization and citizenship 254

Categories of naturalized persons 254

Who are eligible for naturalization 255

Procedure of naturalization 256

Rights of naturalized persons 257

Congress' power exclusive 258

Right of expatriation: Loss of citizenship 258

Exclusion of aliens 259

Bankruptcy 262

Persons who may be released from debt 262

Liberalization of relief granted 262

Constitutional limitations on the bankruptcy power 263

Power not exclusive 264

Constitutional status of State insolvency laws 264

Clauses 5 and 6. Fiscal and monetary powers of Congress 265

Coinage, weights, and measures 265

Punishment of counterfeiting 266

Borrowing power versus the fiscal power 266

Clause 7. Postal power 267

"Establish" 267

Powers to protect the mails 268

Antislavery and the mails 268

Power to prevent harmful use of the postal facilities 268

Exclusion power as an adjunct to other powers 269

State regulations affecting the mails 270

Clause 8. Copyrights and Patents 271

Scope of the power 271

Patentable discoveries 271

Procedure in issuing patents 274

Nature and scope of the right secured 274

Power of Congress over patent rights 275

State power affecting patents and copyrights 276

Trade-marks and advertisements 276

Clause 9. _See_ article III 277

Clause 10. Piracies and felonies 277

Origin of the clause 277

Definition of offenses 277

Extraterritorial reach of the power 278

Clauses 11, 12, 13, and 14. War: Military establishments 279

War power 279

Source and scope 279

An inherent power 280

A complexus of granted powers 281

Declaration of war: When required 281

Prize Cases, The, (1863) 282

Power to raise and maintain armed forces 283

Purpose of specific grants 283

Time limit on appropriations for the army 283

Establishment of the air force 284

Conscription 284

Care of the armed forces 285

Trial and punishment of offenses 285

War legislation 286

Revolutionary war legislation 286

Civil War legislation 287

World War I legislation 287

World War II legislation 288

Mobilization of industrial resources 288

Delegation of legislative power in wartime 289

Mergence of legislative and executive in wartime 290

Doctrine of Lichter _v._ United States 290

War powers in time of peace 291

Atomic Energy Act 292

Postwar legislation 292

Private rights in wartime 293

Enemy country 293

Theatre of military operations 294

Enemy property 294

Prizes of war 295

Police regulations: Rent control 296

Personal liberty in wartime 297

Alien enemies 297

Eminent domain 298

Clauses 15 and 16. Militia 299

Militia clauses 299

Calling out the militia 299

Regulation of the militia 299

Clause 17. Seat of government, etc. 300

Seat of government 300

Nature and extent of rights ceded to United States 301

Retrocession of Alexandria county 301

Continuance of State laws 302

Status of the district today 302

Legislative power over the district 303

Taxation in the district 303

Delegation of legislative power to municipal officers 304

Courts of the district 304

Authority over places purchased 305

"Places" 305

Duration of federal jurisdiction 305

Reservation of jurisdiction by States 306

Clause 18. "Necessary and proper" clause 307

Coefficient or elastic clause 307

Scope of incidental powers 307

Operation of coefficient clause 308

Definition and punishment of crimes 308

Chartering of banks 309

Currency regulations 309

Power to charter corporations 310

Courts and judicial proceedings 310

Special acts concerning claims 311

Maritime law 311

Section 9. Powers denied to Congress 312

General purpose of the section 312

Clause 1. Importation of slaves 312

Clause 2. Suspension of the privilege of the writ of habeas

corpus 312

Habeas corpus 312

Purpose of the writ 312

Errors which may be corrected on habeas corpus 313

Habeas corpus not a substitute for appeal 314

Issuance of the writ 314

Suspension of the privilege 315

Clause 3. Attainder and ex post facto laws 315

Bills of attainder 315

Ex post facto laws 316

Definition 316

What constitutes punishment 317

Changes in place or mode of trial 317

Clause 4. Capitation and direct taxes 317

Direct taxes 317

The Hylton case 317

From the Hylton to the Pollock case 318

Restriction of the Pollock decision 319

Miscellaneous 321

Clause 5. Export duties 321

Taxes on exports 321

Stamp taxes 322

Clause 6. "No preference" clause 322

Clause 7. Appropriations and accounting of public mon 323

Appropriations 323

Payment of claims 324

Clause 8. Titles of nobility and gifts from foreign

States 324

Section 10. Powers denied to the States 325

Clause 1. Not to make treaties, coin money, pass ex post

facto laws, impair contracts, etc. 325

Treaties, alliances, or confederations 325

Bills of credit 326

Legal tender 326

Bills of attainder 326

Ex post facto laws 327

Scope of provision 327

Denial of future privileges to past offenders 327

Changes in punishment 328

Changes in procedure 328

Obligation of contracts 329

Definition of terms 329

"Law" 329

Status of judicial decisions 329

"Obligation" 332

"Impair" 332

"Contracts," extended to cover public contracts 332

Fletcher _v._ Peck 335

New Jersey _v._ Wilson 336

Corporate charters; Different ways of regarding 336

Dartmouth College case 338

Classes of cases under the clause 339

Public grants 339

Municipal corporations 339

Public offices 340

Revocable privileges versus "contracts": Tax exemptions 341

Vested rights 343

Reservation of the right to alter and repeal 343

Right to reserve: When limited 343

Corporations as persons subject to the law 345

Corporations and the police power 345

Strict construction of public grants 346

Charles River Bridge case 346

Application of the strict construction rule 346

Strict construction of tax exemptions 347

Strict construction and the police power 348

Doctrine of inalienable State powers 349

Eminent domain power inalienable 349

Taxing power not inalienable 350

Police power: When inalienable 351

Private contracts 352

Scope of the term 352

Source of the obligation 352

Ogden _v._ Saunders 353

Remedy a part of the obligation 354

Establishment of the rule 354

Qualifications of the rule 355

Municipal Bond cases 356

Private contracts and the police power 357

Emergency legislation 358

Individual rights versus public welfare 359

Evaluation of the clause today 359

Statistical data pertinent to the clause 361

Clause 2. Not to levy duties on exports and imports 362

Duties on exports and imports 362

Scope 362

Privilege taxes 363

Property taxes 364

Inspection laws 364

Clause 3. Not to lay tonnage duties, keep troops, make

compacts, or engage in war 365

Tonnage duties 365

Keeping troops 366

Interstate compacts 366

Background of clause 366

Subject matter of interstate compacts 368

Consent of Congress 368

Grants of franchise to corporation by two States 369

Legal effect of interstate compacts 369

LEGISLATIVE DEPARTMENT

Article I

Section 1. All legislative Powers herein granted shall be

vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a

Senate and House of Representatives.

Doctrine of Enumerated Powers

Two important doctrines of Constitutional Law--that the Federal

Government is one of enumerated powers and that legislative power may

not be delegated--are derived in part from this section. The classical

statement of the former is that by Chief Justice Marshall in McCulloch

_v._ Maryland: "This government is acknowledged by all, to be one of

enumerated powers. The principle, that it can exercise only the powers

granted to it, would seem too apparent, to have required to be enforced

by all those arguments, which its enlightened friends, while it was

depending before the people, found it necessary to urge; that principle

is now universally admitted."[1] That, however, "the executive power" is

not confined to the items of it which are enumerated in article II was

asserted early in the history of the Constitution by Madison and

Hamilton alike and is today the doctrine of the Court;[2] and a similar

latitudinarian conception of "the judicial power of the United States"

was voiced in Justice Brewer's opinion for the Court in Kansas _v._

Colorado.[3] But even when confined to "the legislative powers herein

granted," the doctrine is severely strained by Marshall's conception of

some of these as set forth in his McCulloch _v._ Maryland opinion: This

asserts that "the sword and the purse, all the external relations, and

no inconsiderable portion of the industry of the nation, are intrusted

to its government";[4] he characterizes "the power of making war," of

"levying taxes," and of "regulating commerce" as "great, substantive and

independent powers";[5] and the power conferred by the "necessary and

proper" clause embraces, he declares, "all [legislative] means which are

appropriate" to carry out "the legitimate ends" of the Constitution,

unless forbidden by "the letter and spirit of the Constitution."[6] Nine

years later, Marshall introduced what Story in his Commentaries labels

the concept of "resulting powers," those which "rather be a result from

the whole mass of the powers of the National Government, and from the

nature of political society, than a consequence or incident of the

powers specially enumerated."[7] Story's reference is to Marshall's

opinion in American Insurance Company _v._ Canter,[8] where the latter

says, that "the Constitution confers absolutely on the government of the

Union, the powers of making war, and of making treaties; consequently,

that government possesses the power of acquiring territory, either by

conquest or by treaty."[9] And from the power to acquire territory, he

continues, arises as "the inevitable consequence" the right to govern

it.[10] Subsequently, powers have been repeatedly ascribed to the

National Government by the Court on grounds which ill accord with the

doctrine of enumerated powers: the power to legislate in effectuation of

the "rights expressly given, and duties expressly enjoined" by the

Constitution;[11] the power to impart to the paper currency of the

Government the quality of legal tender in the payment of debts;[12] the

power to acquire territory by discovery;[13] the power to legislate for

the Indian tribes wherever situated in the United States;[14] the power

to exclude and deport aliens;[15] and to require that those who are

admitted be registered and fingerprinted;[16] and finally the complete

powers of sovereignty, both those of war and peace, in the conduct of

foreign relations. In the words of Justice Sutherland in United States

_v._ Curtiss-Wright Export Corporation,[17] decided in 1936: "The broad

statement that the federal government can exercise no powers except

those specifically enumerated in the Constitution, and such implied

powers as are necessary and proper to carry into effect the enumerated

powers, is categorically true only in respect of our internal affairs.

In that field, the primary purpose of the Constitution was to carve from

the general mass of legislative powers _then possessed by the states_

such portions as it was thought desirable to vest in the federal

government, leaving those not included in the enumeration still in the

states.... That this doctrine applies only to powers which the states

had, is self evident. And since the states severally never possessed

international powers, such powers could not have been carved from the

mass of state powers but obviously were transmitted to the United States

from some other source.... A political society cannot endure without a

supreme will somewhere. Sovereignty is never held in suspense. When,

therefore, the external sovereignty of Great Britain in respect of the

colonies ceased, it immediately passed to the Union.... It results that

the investment of the federal government with the powers of external

sovereignty did not depend upon the affirmative grants of the

Constitution. The powers to declare and wage war, to conclude peace, to

make treaties, to maintain diplomatic relations with other

sovereignties, if they had never been mentioned in the Constitution,

would have vested in the federal government as necessary concomitants of

nationality."[18] Yet for the most part, these holdings do not, as

Justice Sutherland suggests, directly affect "the internal affairs" of

the nation; they touch principally its peripheral relations, as it

were. The most serious inroads on the doctrine of enumerated powers are,

in fact, those which have taken place under cover of the doctrine--the

vast expansion in recent years of national legislative power in the

regulation of commerce among the States and in the expenditure of the

national revenues; and verbally at least Marshall laid the ground for

these developments in some of the phraseology above quoted from his

opinion in McCulloch _v._ Maryland.

Nondelegability of Legislative Power

ORIGIN OF DOCTRINE

At least three distinct ideas have contributed to the development of the

principle that legislative power cannot be delegated. One is the

doctrine of separation of powers: Why go to the trouble of separating

the three powers of government if they can straightway remerge on their

own motion? The second is the concept of due process of law, which

precludes the transfer of regulatory functions to private persons.

Lastly, there is the maxim of agency "_Delegata potestas non potest

delegari_," which John Locke borrowed and formulated as a dogma of

political science.[19] In Hampton Jr. & Co. _v._ United States,[20]

Chief Justice Taft offered the following explanation of the origin and

limitations of this idea as a postulate of constitutional law: "The

well-known maxim '_Delegata potestas non potest delegari_,' applicable

to the law of agency in the general and common law, is well understood

and has had wider application in the construction of our Federal and

State Constitutions than it has in private law. The Federal Constitution

and State Constitutions of this country divide the governmental power

into three branches. * * * in carrying out that constitutional division

* * * it is a breach of the National fundamental law if Congress gives

up its legislative power and transfers it to the President, or to the

Judicial branch, or if by law it attempts to invest itself or its

members with either executive power or judicial power. This is not to

say that the three branches are not co-ordinate parts of one government

and that each in the field of its duties may not invoke the action of

the two other branches in so far as the action invoked shall not be an

assumption of the constitutional field of action of another branch. In

determining what it may do in seeking assistance from another branch,

the extent and character of that assistance must be fixed according to

common sense and the inherent necessities of the governmental

co-ordination."[21]

FUNCTIONS WHICH MAY BE DELEGATED

Yielding to "common sense and the inherent necessities of governmental

co-ordination" the Court has sustained numerous statutes granting in the

total vast powers to administrative or executive agencies. Two different

theories, both enunciated during the Chief Justiceship of John Marshall,

have been utilized to justify these results. First in importance is the

theory that another department may be empowered to "fill up the details"

of a statute.[22] The second is that Congress may legislate

contingently, leaving to others the task of ascertaining the facts which

bring its declared policy into operation.[23]

POWER TO SUPPLEMENT STATUTORY PROVISIONS

The pioneer case which recognized the right of Congress to lodge in

another department the power to "fill up the details" of a statute arose

out of the authority given to federal courts to establish rules of

practice, provided such rules were not repugnant to the laws of the

United States. Chief Justice Marshall overruled the objection that this

constituted an invalid delegation of legislative power, saying: "It will

not be contended, that Congress can delegate to the courts, or to any

other tribunals, powers which are strictly and exclusively legislative.

But Congress may certainly delegate to others, powers which the

legislature may rightfully exercise itself. * * * The line has not been

exactly drawn which separates those important subjects, which must be

entirely regulated by the legislature itself, from those of less

interest, in which a general provision may be made, and power given to

those who are to act under such general provisions, to fill up the

details."[24]

STANDARDS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION

Before another agency can "fill up the details," Congress must enact

something to be thus supplemented. In the current idiom, the lawmakers

must first adopt a policy or set up an "intelligible standard" to which

administrative action must conform.[25] But the Court has taken a

generous view of what constitutes a policy or standard. Although it has

said that "procedural safeguards cannot validate an unconstitutional

delegation,"[26] the nature of the proceedings appears to be one of the

elements weighed in determining whether a specific delegation is

constitutional.[27] In cases where the delegated power is exercised by

orders directed to particular persons after notice and hearing, with

findings of fact and of law based upon the record made in the hearing,

the Court has ruled that such general terms as "public interest,"[28]

"public convenience, interest, or necessity,"[29] or "excessive

profits,"[30] were sufficient to satisfy constitutional requirements.

But in two cases arising under the National Industrial Recovery Act, a

policy declaration of comparable generality was held insufficient for

the promulgation of rules applicable to all persons engaged in a

designated activity, without the procedural safeguards which surround

the issuance of individual orders.[31] By subsequent decisions, somewhat

more elaborate, but still very broad, standards have been deemed

adequate for various price fixing measures.[32] In a recent case,[33]

the Court sustained a statute which, without any explicit standards

whatever, authorized the Federal Home Loan Bank Board to make rules and

regulations for the supervision of Federal Savings and Loan

Associations. That decision was influenced by the fact that the

corporation was chartered by federal law as well as by the peculiar

problems involved in the supervision of financial institutions. The

Court was at pains to make clear that this decision would not

necessarily govern the disposition of dissimilar cases.[34]

RULE-MAKING POWER

After Wayman _v._ Southard, nearly three quarters of a century elapsed

before the Court had occasion to approve the delegation to an executive

officer of power to issue regulations for the administration of a

statute. In 1897 it sustained the authority granted to the Commissioner

of Internal Revenue to designate the "marks, brands and stamps" to be

affixed to packages of oleomargarine.[35] Soon thereafter it upheld an

act which directed the Secretary of the Treasury to promulgate minimum

standards of quality and purity for tea imported into the United

States.[36] It has approved the delegation to executive or

administrative officials of authority to make rules governing the use of

forest reservations;[37] permitting reasonable variations and tolerances

in the marking of food packages to disclose their contents;[38]

designating tobacco markets at which grading of tobacco would be

compulsory;[39] establishing priorities for the transportation of

freight during a period of emergency;[40] prescribing price schedules

for the distribution of milk;[41] or for all commodities[42] and for

rental housing[43] in time of war; regulating wages and prices in the

production and distribution of coal;[44] imposing a curfew to protect

military resources in designated areas from espionage and sabotage;[45]

providing for the appointment of receivers or conservators for Federal

Savings and Loan Associations;[46] allotting marketing quotas for

tobacco;[47] and prescribing methods of accounting for carriers in

interstate commerce.[48]

ORDERS DIRECTED TO PARTICULAR PERSONS

The now familiar pattern of regulation of important segments of the

economy by boards or commissions which combine in varying proportions

the functions of all three departments of government was first

established by the States in the field of railroad rate regulation.

Discovering that direct action was impracticable, the State legislatures

created commissions to deal with the problem. One of the pioneers in

this development was Minnesota, whose Supreme Court justified the

practice in an opinion which, with the implied[49] and later the

explicit,[50] endorsement of the Supreme Court, practically settled the

law on this point: "If such a power is to be exercised at all, it can

only be satisfactorily done by a board or commission, constantly in

session, whose time is exclusively given to the subject, and who, after

investigation of the facts, can fix rates with reference to the peculiar

circumstances of each road, and each particular kind of business, and

who can change or modify these rates to suit the ever-varying conditions

of traffic."[51] Contemporaneously Congress created the Interstate

Commerce Commission to regulate the rates and practices of railroads

with respect to interstate commerce. Although the Supreme Court has

never had occasion to render a direct decision on the delegation of

rate-making power to the Commission, it has repeatedly affirmed rate

orders issued by that agency.[52] Likewise it has sustained the power of

the Secretary of War to order the removal or alteration of bridges which

unreasonably obstructed navigation over navigable waters;[53] the power

of the Federal Reserve Board to authorize national banks to act as

fiduciaries;[54] the authority of the Secretary of Labor to deport

aliens of certain enumerated classes, if after hearing he found such

aliens to be "undesirable residents";[55] the responsibility of the

Interstate Commerce Commission to approve railroad consolidations found

to be in the "public interest";[56] and the powers of the Federal Radio

Commission[57] and the Federal Communications Commission[58] to license

broadcasting stations as "public convenience, interest and necessity"

may require. The terms, however, in which a statute delegates authority

to an administrative agent are subject to judicial review; and in a

recent case the Court disallowed an order of the Secretary of

Agriculture proporting resting on Sec. 8 of the Agricultural Marketing

Agreement Act of 1937[59] as _ultra vires_.[60]

DELEGATION TO PRIVATE PERSONS

Although in a few early cases the Supreme Court enforced statutes which

gave legal effect to local customs of miners with respect to mining

claims on public lands,[61] and to standards adopted by railroads for

equipment on railroad cars,[62] it held, in Schechter Poultry Corp. _v._

United States,[63] and Carter _v._ Carter Coal Company[64] that private

trade groups could not be empowered to issue binding rules concerning

methods of competition or wages and hours of labor. On the other hand,

statutes providing that restrictions upon the production or marketing of

agricultural commodities shall become operative only upon a favorable

vote by a prescribed majority of the persons affected have been

upheld.[65] The position of the Court is that such a requirement does

not involve any delegation of legislative authority, since Congress has

merely placed a restriction upon its own regulation by withholding its

operation in a given case unless it is approved upon a referendum.[66]

POWER TO GIVE EFFECT TO CONTINGENT LEGISLATION

An entirely different problem arises when, instead of directing another

department of government to apply a general statute to individual cases,

or to supplement it by detailed regulation, Congress commands that a

previously enacted statute be revived, suspended or modified, or that a

new rule be put into operation, upon the finding of certain facts by an

executive or administrative officer. Since the delegated function in

such cases is not that of "filling up the details" of a statute,

authority for it must be sought elsewhere than in Wayman _v._ Southard

and its progeny. It is to be found in an even earlier case--The Brig

Aurora[67]--where the revival of a law upon the issuance of a

Presidential proclamation was upheld in 1813. After previous restraints

on British shipping had lapsed, Congress passed a new law stating that

those restrictions should be renewed in the event the President found

and proclaimed that France had abandoned certain practices which

violated the neutral commerce of the United States. To the objection

that this was an invalid delegation of legislative power, the Court

answered briefly that "we can see no sufficient reason, why the

legislature should not exercise its discretion in reviving the act of

March 1st, 1809, either expressly or conditionally, as their judgment

should direct."[68]

MODIFICATION OF TARIFF LAWS

This point was raised again in Field _v._ Clark,[69] where the Tariff

Act of 1890 was assailed as unconstitutional because it directed the

President to suspend the free importation of enumerated commodities "for

such time as he shall deem just" if he found that other countries

imposed upon agricultural or other products of the United States duties

or other exactions which "he may deem to be reciprocally unequal and

unjust." In sustaining this statute the Court relied heavily upon two

factors: (1) legislative precedents which demonstrated that "in the

judgment of the legislative branch of the government, it is often

desirable, if not essential, * * *, to invest the President with large

discretion in matters arising out of the execution of statutes relating

to trade and commerce with other nations";[70] (2) that the act "did

not, in any real sense, invest the President with the power of

legislation. * * * Congress itself prescribed, in advance, the duties to

be levied, * * *, while the suspension lasted. Nothing involving the

expediency or the just operation of such legislation was left to the

determination of the President. * * * He had no discretion in the

premises except in respect to the duration of the suspension so

ordered."[71] By similar reasoning, the Court sustained the flexible

provisions of the Tariff Act of 1922 whereby duties were increased or

decreased to reflect differences in cost of production at home and

abroad, as such differences were ascertained and proclaimed by the

President.[72]

ARMS EMBARGO

That the delegation of discretion in dealing with foreign relations

stands upon a different footing than the transfer of authority to

regulate domestic concerns was clearly indicated in United States _v._

Curtiss-Wright Export Corp.[73] There the Court upheld the Joint

Resolution of Congress which made it unlawful to sell arms to certain

warring countries "if the President finds that the prohibition of the

sale of arms and munitions of war in the United States to those

countries now engaged in armed conflict in the Chaco may contribute to

the reestablishment of peace * * *, and if * * *, he makes proclamation

to that effect, * * *" Said Justice Sutherland for the Court: "It is

important to bear in mind that we are here dealing not alone with an

authority vested in the President by an exertion of legislative power,

but with such an authority plus the very delicate, plenary and exclusive

power of the President as the sole organ of the Federal Government in

the field of international relations--* * *, Congressional legislation

which is to be made effective through negotiation and inquiry within the

international field must often accord to the President a degree of

discretion and freedom from statutory restriction which would not be

admissible were domestic affairs alone involved."[74]

INTERNAL AFFAIRS

Panama Refining Co. _v._ Ryan[75] was the first case in which the

President had been authorized to put into effect by proclamation, a new

and independent rule pertaining to internal affairs. One section of the

National Industrial Recovery Act authorized the President to forbid the

shipment in interstate commerce of oil produced or withdrawn from

storage in violation of State law. Apart from the purposes broadly

stated in the first section--economic recovery and conservation of

natural resources--the measure contained no standard or statement of

policy by which the President should be guided in determining whether or

when to issue the order. Nor did it require him to make any findings of

fact to disclose the basis of his action. By a vote of eight-to-one the

Court held the delegation invalid. The only case in which the power of

an administrative official to modify a rule enacted by Congress relating

to domestic affairs has been sustained is Opp Cotton Mills _v._

Administrator.[76] That case involved the provisions of the Fair Labor

Standards Act which authorized the appointment of Industry Advisory

Committees to investigate conditions in particular industries, with

notice and opportunity to be heard afforded to interested parties. Upon

consideration of factors enumerated in the law and upon finding that the

conditions specified in the law were fulfilled, such Committees were

empowered to recommend and the Administrator to adopt, higher minimum

wage rates for particular industries. Emphasizing the procedure which

the agency was directed to follow and the fact that it would be

impossible for Congress to prescribe specific minimum wages for

particular industries,[77] a unanimous court sustained the law on the

ground that the sole function of the Administrator was to put into

effect the definite policy adopted by the legislators.

EMERGENCY STATUTES

Occupying a midway station between legislation which deals with foreign

affairs and purely domestic legislation is what may be termed "emergency

statutes." These are largely the outgrowth of the two World Wars. Thus

on December 16, 1950, President Truman issued a proclamation declaring

"the existence of a national emergency," and by so doing "activated"

more than sixty statutes or parts thereof which by their terms apply to

or during "a condition of emergency" or "in time of war or national

emergency," etc. Most of these specifically leave it to the President to

determine the question of emergency, and the White House assumption

seems to be that they all do so. Many of the provisions thus activated

delegate powers of greater or less importance to the President himself

or remove statutory restrictions thereon.[78]

PUNISHMENT OF VIOLATIONS

If Congress so provides, violations of valid administrative regulations

may be punished as crimes.[79] But the penalties must be provided in the

statute itself; additional punishment cannot be imposed by

administrative action.[80] In an early case, the Court held that a

section prescribing penalties for any violation of a statute did not

warrant a prosecution for wilful disobedience of regulations authorized

by, and lawfully issued pursuant to, the act.[81] Without disavowing

this general proposition, the Court, in 1944, upheld a suspension order

issued by the OPA whereby a dealer in fuel oil who had violated

rationing regulations was forbidden to receive or deal on that

commodity.[82] Although such an order was not explicitly authorized by

statute, it was sustained as being a reasonable measure for effecting a

fair allocation of fuel oil, rather than as a means of punishment for an

offender. In another OPA case, the Court ruled that in a criminal

prosecution, a price regulation was subject to the same rule of strict

construction as a statute, and that omissions from, or indefiniteness

in, such a regulation, could not be cured by the Administrator's

interpretation thereof.[83]

Congressional Investigations

INVESTIGATIONS IN AID OF LEGISLATION

No provision of the Constitution expressly authorized either house of

Congress to make investigations and exact testimony to the end that it

may exercise its legislative function effectively and advisedly. But

such a power had been frequently exercised by the British Parliament and

by the Assemblies of the American Colonies prior to the adoption of the

Constitution.[84] It was asserted by the House of Representatives as

early as 1792 when it appointed a committee to investigate the disaster

to General St. Clair and his army in the Northwest and empowered it to

"call for such persons, papers, and records, as may be necessary to

assist their inquiries."[85]

CONDUCT OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT

For many years the investigating function of Congress was limited to

inquiries into the administration of the Executive Department or of

instrumentalities of the Government. Until the administration of Andrew

Jackson this power was not seriously challenged.[86] During the

controversy over renewal of the charter of the Bank of the United

States, John Quincy Adams contended that an unlimited inquiry into the

operations of the bank would be beyond the power of the House.[87] Four

years later the legislative power of investigation was challenged by the

President. A committee appointed by the House of Representatives "with

power to send for persons and papers, and with instructions to inquire

into the condition of the various executive departments, the ability and

integrity with which they have been conducted, * * *"[88] called upon

the President and the heads of departments for lists of persons

appointed without the consent of the Senate and the amounts paid to

them. Resentful of this attempt "to invade the just rights of the

Executive Departments" the President refused to comply and the majority

of the committee acquiesced.[89] Nevertheless Congressional

investigations of Executive Departments have continued to the present

day. Shortly before the Civil War, contempt proceedings against a

witness who refused to testify in an investigation of John Brown's raid

upon the arsenal at Harper's Ferry occasioned a thorough consideration

by the Senate of the basis of this power. After a protracted debate,

which cut sharply across sectional and party lines, the Senate voted

overwhelmingly to imprison the contumacious witness.[90] Notwithstanding

this firmly established legislative practice the Supreme Court took a

narrow view of the power in the case of Kilbourn _v._ Thompson.[91] It

held that the House of Representatives had overstepped its jurisdiction

when it instituted an investigation of losses suffered by the United

States as a creditor of Jay Cooke and Company, whose estate was being

administered in bankruptcy by a federal court. But nearly half a century

later, in McGrain _v._ Daugherty,[92] it ratified in sweeping terms, the

power of Congress to inquire into the administration of an executive

department and to sift charges of malfeasance in such administration.

PRIVATE AFFAIRS

Beginning with the resolution adopted by the House of Representatives in

1827 which vested its Committee on Manufactures "with the power to send

for persons and papers with a view to ascertain and report to this House

such facts as may be useful to guide the judgment of this House in

relation to a revision of the tariff duties on imported goods,"[93] the

two Houses have asserted the right to inquire into private affairs when

necessary to enlighten their judgment on proposed legislation. In

Kilbourn _v._ Thompson,[94] the Court denied the right of Congress to

pry into private affairs. Again, in Interstate Commerce Commission _v._

Brimson,[95] in sustaining a statute authorizing the Courts to use their

process to compel witnesses to give testimony sought by the Commission

for the enforcement of the act, the Court warned that, "neither branch

of the legislative department, still less any merely administrative

body, established by Congress, possesses, or can be invested with, a

general power of making inquiry into the private affairs of the

citizen."[96] Finally, however, in McGrain _v._ Daugherty,[97] the power

of either House "to compel a private individual to appear before it or

one of its committees and give testimony needed to enable it efficiently

to exercise a legislative function belonging to it under the

Constitution, * * *"[98] was judicially recognized and approved.

PURPOSE OF INQUIRY

In the absence of any showing that legislation was contemplated as a

result of the inquiry undertaken in Kilbourn _v._ Thompson, the Supreme

Court concluded that the purpose was an improper one--to pry into

matters with which the judiciary alone was empowered to deal.[99]

Subsequent cases have given the legislature the benefit of a presumption

that its object is legitimate. In re Chapman[100] established the

proposition that to make an investigation lawful "it was certainly not

necessary that the resolutions should declare in advance what the Senate

meditated doing when the investigation was concluded."[101] Similarly,

in McGrain _v._ Daugherty, the investigation was presumed to have been

undertaken in good faith to aid the Senate in legislating.[102] Going

one step further in Sinclair _v._ United States,[103] which on its facts

presented a close parallel to the Kilbourn Case, the Court affirmed the

right of the Senate to carry on its investigation of fraudulent leases

of government property after suit for the recovery thereof had been

instituted. The president of the lessee corporation had refused to

testify on the ground that the questions related to his private affairs

and to matters cognizable only in the courts wherein they were pending

and that the committee avowedly had departed from any inquiry in aid of

legislation. The Senate prudently had directed the investigating

committee to ascertain what, if any, other or additional legislation may

be advisable. Conceding "that Congress is without authority to compel

disclosures for the purpose of aiding the prosecution of pending suits,"

the Court declared that the authority "to require pertinent disclosures

in aid of its own constitutional power is not abridged because the

information sought to be elicited may also be of use in such

suits."[104]

JUDICIAL FUNCTIONS

When either House exercises a judicial function, as in judging of

elections or determining whether a member should be expelled, it is

clearly entitled to compel the attendance of witnesses to disclose the

facts upon which its action must be based. Thus the Court held that

since a House had a right to expel a member for any offense which it

deemed incompatible with his trust and duty as a member, it was entitled

to investigate such conduct and to summon private individuals to give

testimony concerning it.[105] The decision in Barry _v._ United States

ex rel. Cunningham[106] sanctioned the exercise of a similar power in

investigating a Senatorial election.

SANCTIONS OF THE INVESTIGATORY POWER

Contempt

Explicit judicial recognition of the right of either House of Congress

to commit for contempt a witness who ignores its summons or refuses to

answer its inquiries dates from McGrain _v._ Daugherty. But the

principle there applied had its roots in an early case, Anderson _v._

Dunn,[107] which affirmed in broad terms the right of either branch of

the legislature to attach and punish a person other than a member for

contempt of its authority--in that case an attempt to bribe one of its

members. The right to punish a contumacious witness was conceded in

Marshall _v._ Gordon,[108] although the Court there held that the

implied power to deal with contempt did not extend to the arrest of a

person who published matter defamatory of the House. Both Anderson _v._

Dunn and Marshall _v._ Gordon emphasized that the power to punish for

contempt rests upon the right of self-preservation; that is, in the

words of Chief Justice White, "the right to prevent acts which in and of

themselves inherently obstruct or prevent the discharge of legislative

duty or the refusal to do that which there is inherent legislative power

to compel in order that legislative functions may be performed."[109]

Whence it was argued, in Jurney _v._ MacCracken[110] that the Senate had

no power to punish a witness who, having been commanded to produce

papers, destroyed them after service of the subpoena, because the "power

to punish for contempt may never be exerted, in the case of a private

citizen, solely _qua_ punishment. * * * the power to punish ceases as

soon as the obstruction has been removed, or its removal has become

impossible; * * *" The Court confirmed the power to punish for a past

contempt as an appropriate means for vindicating "the established and

essential privilege of requiring the production of evidence."[111]

Criminal Prosecutions

Under the rule laid down by Anderson _v._ Dunn, imprisonment for

contempt of one of the Houses of Congress could not extend beyond the

adjournment of the body which ordered it.[112] This limitation seriously

impaired the efficacy of such sanction. Accordingly, in 1857 Congress

found it necessary to provide criminal penalties for recalcitrant

witnesses, in order to make its power to compel testimony more

effective. The Supreme Court held that the purpose of this statute was

merely to supplement the power of contempt by providing additional

punishment, and overruled all constitutional objections to it saying:

"We grant that Congress could not divest itself, or either of its

Houses, of the essential and inherent power to punish for contempt, in

cases to which the power of either House properly extended; but, because

Congress, by the act of 1857, sought to aid each of the Houses in the

discharge of its constitutional functions, it does not follow that any

delegation of the power in each to punish for contempt was involved;

* * *."[113] In a prosecution for wilful failure of a person to produce

records within her custody and control pursuant to a lawful subpoena

issued by a committee of the House of Representatives, the Supreme Court

ruled that the presence of a quorum of the committee at the time of the

return of the subpoena was not an essential element of the offense.[114]

Previously the Court had held that a prosecution could not be maintained

under a general perjury statute for false testimony given before a

Congressional committee unless a quorum of the committee was present

when the evidence was given.[115]

Section 2. Clause 1. The House of Representatives shall be

composed of Members chosen every second Year by the People of the

several States, and the Electors in each State shall have the

Qualifications requisite for Electors of the most numerous Branch of the

State Legislature.

Clause 2. No Person shall be a Representative who shall not have

attained to the Age of twenty five Years, and been seven Years a Citizen

of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant

of the State in which he shall be chosen.

Qualifications of Members of Congress

CONGRESSIONAL PROTECTION OF RIGHT TO VOTE FOR REPRESENTATIVES

Although the qualifications of electors of Members of Congress are

defined by State law,[116] the right to vote for such Representatives is

derived from the Federal Constitution.[117] Unlike the rights guaranteed

by the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments, this privilege is secured

against the actions of individuals as well as of the States.[118] It

embraces the right to cast a ballot and to have it counted

honestly.[119] Where a primary election is made by law an integral part

of the procedure of choice or where the choice of a representative is in

fact controlled by the primary, the Constitution safeguards the rights

of qualified electors to participate therein.[120] Congress may protect

this right by appropriate legislation.[121] In prosecutions instituted

under section 19 of the Criminal Code,[122] the Court had held that

failure to count ballots lawfully cast,[123] or dilution of their value

by stuffing the ballot box with fraudulent ballots[124] constitutes a

denial of the constitutional right to elect Representatives in Congress.

But the bribery of voters, although within reach of Congressional power

under other clauses of the Constitution, is not deemed to be an

interference with the rights guaranteed by this section to other

qualified voters.[125]

WHEN THE ABOVE QUALIFICATIONS MUST BE POSSESSED

The principal disputes which have arisen under these sections have

related to the time as of which members-elect must fulfill the

conditions of eligibility, and whether additional requirements may be

imposed by federal or State law. Although on two occasions when it

refused to seat persons who were ineligible when they sought to take the

oath of office, the Senate indicated that eligibility must exist at the

time of election, it is now established in both Houses that it is

sufficient if the requirements are met when the oath is administered.

Thus persons elected to either House before attaining the required age

or term of citizenship have been admitted as soon as they became

qualified.[126]

ENLARGEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS

Writing in The Federalist[127] with reference to the election of Members

of Congress, Hamilton expressed the opinion that "the qualifications of

persons who may * * * be chosen * * * are defined and fixed in the

Constitution and are unalterable by the legislature." The question

remained academic until the Civil War, when Congress passed a law

requiring its members to take an oath that they had never been disloyal

to the Federal Government. In subsequent contests over the seating of

men charged with disloyalty, the right of Congress to establish by law

other qualifications for its members than those contained in the

Constitution was sharply challenged. Nevertheless, both the House and

Senate, relying on this act, did refuse to seat several persons.[128] At

this time the principal argument against the statute was that all

persons were eligible for the office of Representative unless the

Constitution made them ineligible. In Burton _v._ United States,[129]

the argument was given a new twist. A law providing that a Senator or

Representative convicted of unlawfully receiving money for services

rendered before a government department should be "rendered forever

thereafter incapable of holding any office of honor, trust or profit

under the Government of the United States," was assailed as an

unconstitutional interference with the authority of each House to judge

the qualifications of, or to expel, one of its own members. The Court

construed the statute not to affect the offender's tenure as a Senator,

and left undecided the power of Congress to impose additional

qualifications (or disqualifications).[130] In exercising the power

granted by section 5 to judge the qualifications of its own members,

each House has asserted the power to inquire into the conduct of a

member-elect prior to his election. In 1900 the House of Representatives

refused to seat a person who practiced polygamy,[131] and in 1928 the

Senate voted to exclude a Senator-elect on the ground that his

acceptance of large campaign contributions from persons who were subject

to regulation by a State Administrative Commission of which he had been

Chairman were "contrary to sound public policy" and tainted his

credentials with fraud and corruption.[132]

INABILITY OF THE STATES TO ENLARGE

A State may not add to the qualifications prescribed by the Constitution

for members of the Senate and House of Representatives. Asserting this

principle, the House in 1807 seated a member whose election was

contested on the ground that he had not been twelve months a resident of

the district from which elected as required by State law. No attempt was

made to ascertain whether these requirements were met because the State

law was deemed to be unconstitutional.[133] Both the House and Senate

have seated members elected during their term of office as State judges,

despite the provision of State constitutions purporting to bar the

election of judges to any other office under the State or the United

States during such term.[134]

Clause 3. [Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among

the several States which may be included within this Union, according to

their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the

whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a

Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all

other Persons].[135] The actual Enumeration shall be made within three

Years after the first Meeting of the Congress of the United States, and

within every subsequent Term of ten Years, in such Manner as they shall

by Law direct. The Number of Representatives shall not exceed one for

every thirty Thousand, but each State shall have at Least one

Representative; and until such enumeration shall be made, the State of

New Hampshire shall be entitled to chuse three, Massachusetts eight,

Rhode-Island and Providence Plantations one, Connecticut five, New-York

six, New Jersey four, Pennsylvania eight, Delaware one, Maryland six,

Virginia ten, North Carolina five, South Carolina five, and Georgia

three.

THE CENSUS REQUIREMENT

The Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation Annotations of Cases Decided by the Supreme Court of the United States to June 30, 1952 · 第 10 / 39 章