_Be not intimidated, therefore, by any terrors, from publishing, with

the utmost freedom whatever can be warranted by the laws of your

country; nor suffer yourselves to be wheedled out of your liberty by any

pretences of politeness, delicacy, or decency._ These, as they are often

used, are but three different names for hypocrisy, chicanery, and

cowardice. Much less, I presume, will you be discouraged by any

pretences, that malignants on this side the water[A] will represent your

Paper as facetious and seditious, or that the Great on the other side

the water will take offence at them. This dread of representation has

had for a long time in this province effects very similar to what the

physicians call an _hydrophobia_, or dread of water.--It has made us

delirious--and we have rushed headlong into the water, till we are

almost drowned, out of simple or phrensical fear of it. Believe me, the

character of this country has suffered more in Britain, by the

pusillanimity with which we have borne many insults and indignities from

the creatures of power at home, and the creatures of those creatures

here, than it ever did, or ever will by the freedom and spirit that has

been or will be discovered in writing or action. Believe me, my

countrymen, they have imbibed an opinion on the other side the water,

that we are an ignorant, a timid, and a stupid people; nay, their tools

on this side have often the impudence to dispute your bravery.--But I

hope in God the time is near at hand, when they will be fully convinced

of your understanding, integrity, and courage. But can any thing be more

ridiculous, were it not too provoking to be laughed at, than to pretend

that offence should be taken at home for writings here?--Pray let them

look at home. Is not the human understanding exhausted there? Are not

reason, imaginations, wit, passion, senses and all, tortured to find out

satire and invective against the characters of the vile and futile

fellows who sometimes get into place and power?--The most exceptionable

paper that ever I saw here is perfect prudence and modesty, in

comparison of multitudes of their applauded writings. Yet the high

regard they have for the freedom of the Press, indulges all.--I must and

will repeat it, Newspapers deserve the patronage of every friend to his

country. And whether the defamers of them are arrayed in robes of

scarlet or sable, whether they lurk and skulk in an insurance office,

whether they assume the venerable character of a priest, the sly one of

a scrivener, or the dirty, infamous, abandoned one of an informer, they

are all the creatures and tools of the lust of domination.----

[Footnote A: Boston in America.]

The true source of our sufferings, has been our timidity.

We have been afraid to think.--We have felt a reluctance to examining

into the grounds of our privileges, and the extent in which we have an

indisputable right to demand them, against all the power and authority

on earth.--And many who have not scrupled to examine for themselves,

have yet, for certain prudent reasons, been cautious, and diffident of

declaring the result of their enquiries.

The cause of this timidity is perhaps hereditary, and to be traced back

in history, as far as the cruel treatment the first settlers of this

country received, before their embarkation for America, from the

government at home.--Every body knows how dangerous it was, to speak or

write in favour of any thing, in those days, but the triumphant system

of religion and politicks. And our fathers were, particularly, the

objects of the persecutions and proscriptions of the times.--It is not

unlikely therefore, that, although they were inflexibly steady in

refusing their positive assent to any thing against their principles,

they might have contracted habits of reserve, and a cautious diffidence

of asserting their opinions publicly.--These habits they probably

brought with them to America, and have transmitted down to us.--Or, we

may possibly account for this appearance, by the great affection and

veneration, Americans have always entertained for the country from

whence they sprang--or by the quiet temper for which they have been

remarkable, no country having been less disposed to discontent than

this--or by a sense they have that it is their duty to acquiesce under

the administration of government, even when in many smaller matters

grievous to them, and until the essentials of the great compact are

destroyed or invaded. These peculiar causes might operate upon them; but

without these, we all know, that human nature itself, from indolence,

modesty, humanity or fear, has always too much reluctance to a manly

assertion of its rights. Hence perhaps it has happened, that nine-tenths

of the species, are groaning and gasping in misery and servitude.

But whatever the cause has been, the fact is certain, we have been

excessively cautious of giving offence by complaining of

grievances.----And it is as certain, that American governors, and their

friends, and all the crown officers, have availed themselves of this

disposition in the people.--They have prevailed on us to consent to many

things, which were grossly injurious to us, and to surrender many others

with voluntary tameness, to which we had the clearest right. Have we not

been treated formerly, with abominable insolence, by officers of the

navy?----I mean no insinuation against any gentleman now on this

station, having heard no complaint of any one of them to his

dishonour.--Have not some generals, from England, treated us like

servants, nay, more like slaves than like Britons?--Have we not been

under the most ignominious contribution, the most abject submission, the

most supercilious insults of some custom-house officers? Have we not

been trifled with, browbeaten, and trampled on, by former governors, in

a manner which no King of England since James the Second has dared to

indulge towards his subjects? Have we not raised up one family, placed

in them an unlimited confidence, and been soothed, and flattered, and

intimidated by their influence, into a great part of this infamous

tameness and submission?----"These are serious and alarming questions,

and deserve a dispassionate consideration."--

This disposition has been the great wheel and the main spring in the

American machine of court politics.--We have been told, that "the word

_Rights_ is an offensive expression." That "the King, his Ministry, and

Parliament, will not endure to hear Americans talk of their _Rights_."

That "Britain is the mother and we the children, that a filial duty and

submission is due from us to her," and that "we ought to doubt our own

judgment, and presume that she is right, even when she seems to us to

shake the foundations of government." That "Britain is immensely rich,

and great, and powerful, has fleets and armies at her command, which

have been the dread and terror of the universe, and that the will force

her own judgment into execution, right or wrong." But let me intreat

you, Sir, to pause--Do you consider yourself as a missionary of loyalty

or of rebellion? Are you not representing your K--, his Ministry and

Parliament, as tyrants, imperious, unrelenting tyrants, by such

reasoning as this?--Is not this representing your most gracious

Sovereign, as endeavouring to destroy the foundations of his own

throne?--Are you not representing every Member of Parliament as

renouncing the transactions at _Runyn Mead_; [the meadow, near Windsor,

where _Magna Charta_ was signed,] and as repealing in effect the bill of

rights, when the Lords and Commons asserted and vindicated the rights of

the people and their own rights, and insisted on the King's assent to

that assertion and vindication? Do you not represent them, as forgetting

that the Prince of Orange was created King William by the People, on

purpose that their rights might be eternal and inviolable?--Is there not

something extremely fallacious, in the common place images of mother

country and children colonies? Are we the children of Great Britain, any

more than the cities of London, Exeter and Bath? Are we not brethren and

fellow-subjects, with those in Britain, only under a somewhat different

method of legislation, and a totally different method of taxation? But

admitting we are children, have not children a right to complain when

their parents are attempting to break their limbs, to administer poison,

or to sell them to enemies for slaves? Let me intreat you to consider,

will the mother be pleased, when you represent her as deaf to the cries

of her children? When you compare her to the infamous miscreant, who

lately stood on the gallows for starving her child? When you resemble

her to Lady Macbeth in Shakespear, (I cannot think of it without horror)

Who "had given suck, and knew

"How tender 'twas to love the babe that milk'd her."

But yet, who could

"Even while 'twas smiling in her face,

"Have pluck'd her nipple from the boneless gums,

"And dash'd the brains out."

Let us banish for ever from our minds, my countrymen, all such unworthy

ideas of the K--g, his Ministry, and Parliament. Let us not suppose,

that all are become luxurious, effeminate and unreasonable, on the other

side the water, as many designing persons would insinuate. Let us

presume, what is in fact true, that the spirit of liberty is as ardent

as ever among the body of the nation, though a few individuals may be

corrupted.--Let us take it for granted, that the same great spirit,

which once gave Caesar so warm a reception; which denounced hostilities

against John, 'till Magna Charta was signed; which severed the head of

Charles the First from his body, and drove James the Second from his

kingdom; the same great spirit (MAY HEAVEN PRESERVE IT TILL THE EARTH

SHALL BE NO MORE!) which first seated the great grandfather of his

present most gracious Majesty on the throne of Britain, is still alive

and active, and warm in England; and that the same spirit in America,

instead of provoking the inhabitants of that country, will endear us to

them for ever, and secure their good-will.

This spirit, however, without knowledge, would be little better than a

brutal rage.----Let us tenderly and kindly cherish therefore the means

of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak and write.----Let every

order and degree among the people rouse their attention and animate

their resolution.--Let them all become attentive to the grounds and

principles of government, ecclesiastical and civil.--Let us study the

law of nature; search into the spirit of the British constitution; read

the histories of ancient ages; contemplate the great examples of Greece

and Rome; set before us the conduct of our own British ancestors, who

have defended, for _us_, the inherent rights of mankind against foreign

and domestic tyrants and usurpers, against arbitrary kings and cruel

priests, in short against the gates of earth and hell.--Let us read and

recollect, and impress upon our souls the views and ends of our own more

immediate forefathers, in exchanging their native country for a dreary,

inhospitable wilderness. Let us examine into the nature of that power,

and the cruelty of that oppression which drove them from their homes.

Recollect their amazing fortitude, their bitter sufferings! The hunger,

the nakedness, the cold, which they patiently endured! The severe

labours of clearing their grounds, building their houses, raising their

provisions, amidst dangers from wild beasts and savage men, before they

had time or money, or materials for commerce! Recollect the civil and

religious principles, and hopes, and expectations, which constantly

supported and carried them through all hardships, with patience and

resignation! Let us recollect it was liberty! The hope of liberty for

themselves and us and ours, which conquered all discouragements, dangers

and trials!----In such researches as these, let us all in our several

departments chearfully engage! But especially the proper patrons and

supporters of law, learning and religion.

Let the pulpit resound with the doctrines and sentiments of religious

liberty.----Let us hear the danger of thraldom to our consciences, from

ignorance, extream poverty and dependance, in short from civil and

political slavery.--Let us see delineated before us, the true map of

man. Let us hear the dignity of his nature, and the noble rank he holds

among the works of GOD! that consenting to slavery is a sacrilegious

breach of trust, as offensive in the sight of GOD, as it is derogatory

from our own honour, or interest or happiness; and that GOD ALMIGHTY has

promulgated from heaven, liberty, peace, and good-will to man!----

Let the Bar proclaim, "the laws, the rights, the generous plan of

power," delivered down from remote antiquity; inform the world of the

mighty struggles, and numberless sacrifices, made by our ancestors, in

the defence of freedom.--Let it be known, that British liberties are not

the grants of princes or parliaments, but original rights, conditions of

original contracts, co-equal with prerogative, and co-eval with

government.--That many of our rights are inherent and essential, agreed

on as maxims and established as preliminaries, even before a parliament

existed.--Let them search for the foundation of British laws and

government in the frame of human nature, in the constitution of the

intellectual and moral world.--There let us see, that truth, liberty,

justice, and benevolence, are its everlasting basis; and if these could

be removed, the superstructure is overthrown of course.--

Let the colleges join their harmony, in the same delightful

concert.--Let every declamation turn upon the beauty of liberty and

virtue, and the deformity, turpitude and malignity of slavery and

vice.--Let the public disputations become researches into the grounds

and nature and ends of government, and the means of preserving the good

and demolishing the evil.--Let the dialogues and all the exercises

become the instruments of impressing on the tender mind, and of

spreading and distributing, far and wide, the ideas of right and the

sensations of freedom.

In a word, let every sluice of knowledge be opened and set a flowing.

The encroachments upon liberty, in the reigns of the first James and the

first Charles, by turning the general attention of learned men to

government, are said to have produced the greatest number of consummate

statesmen, which has ever been seen in any age, or nation. The Brooke's,

Hamden's, Falkland's, Vane's, Milton's, Nedham's, Harrington's,

Neville's, Sydney's, Locke's, are all said to have owed their eminence

in political knowledge, to the tyrannies of those reigns. The prospect,

now before us, in America, ought, in the same manner, to engage the

attention of every man of learning to matters of power and of right,

that we may be neither led nor driven blindfolded to irretrievable

destruction.----_Nothing less than this seems to have been meditated for

us, by somebody or other in Great Britain._ There seems to be a direct

and formal design on foot, to enslave all America.--This however must

be done by degrees.----The first step that is intended seems to be an

entire subversion of the whole system of our Fathers, by the

introduction of the canon and feudal law, into America.----The canon and

feudal systems though greatly mutilated in England, are not yet

destroyed. Like the temples and palaces, in which the great contrivers

of them were once worshiped and inhabited, they exist in ruins; and much

of the domineering spirit of them still remains.--The designs and

labours of a certain society, to introduce the former of them into

America, have been well exposed to the public by a writer of great

abilities; and the further attempts to the same purpose that may be made

by that society, or by the ministry or parliament, I leave to the

conjectures of the thoughtful.--But it seems very manifest from the

Stamp Act itself, that a design is formed to strip us in a great measure

of the means of knowledge, by loading the Press, the Colleges, and even

an Almanack and a News-Paper, with restraints and duties; and to

introduce the inequalities and dependencies of the feudal system, by

taking from the poorer sort of people all their little subsistence, and

conferring it on a set of stamp officers, distributors and their

deputies.--But I must proceed no farther at present.--The sequel,

whenever I shall find health and leisure to pursue it, will be a

"disquisition of the policy of the stamp act."----In the mean time,

however, let me add, These are not the vapours of a melancholy mind, nor

the effusions of envy, disappointed ambition, nor of a spirit of

opposition to government: but the emanations of an heart that burns for

its country's welfare. No one of any feeling, born and educated in this

once happy country, can consider the numerous distresses, the gross

indignities, the barbarous ignorance, the haughty usurpations, that we

have reason to fear are meditating for ourselves, our children, our

neighbours, in short for all our countrymen, and all their posterity,

without the utmost agonies of heart, and many tears.

FINIS.

Transcriber's Notes:

18th Century English typography has been modernized for ease of reading,

for example, long-s has been rendered using an ordinary s. Spelling

conventions of the times have been maintained.

Several misprints and punctuation errors corrected.

Page 7, Added close quotes to end of quotation.

Page 13, "achievements" spelled "atchievements" Left as is.

Page 26, Added close quotes to end of quotation.

Page 43, "necessay" changed to "necessary".

Page 77, "extrardinary" changed to "extraordinary".

Page 87, "achieved" spelled "atchieved" Left as is.

Ligatures removed in ASCII Version: man[oe]oeuvres to manoeuvres,

[oe]conomy to oeconomy.

A Collection of State-papers, Relative to the First Acknowledgment of the Sovereignty of the United States of America, and the Reception of Their Minister Plenipotentiary, by Their High Mightinesses the States General of the United Netherlands : to Which is Prefixed, the Political Character of John Adams, Ambassador Plenipotentiary from the States of North America, to Their High Mightinesses the States General of the United Provinces of the Netherlands ... Likewise, an Essay on Canon and Feudal Law · 第 7 / 7 段