Life of William Pitt

The biographer of Pitt was a grandson of the Lord Mahon,

afterwards Earl of Stanhope, who married, in 1774, the great

statesman's eldest sister. Philip Henry Stanhope was born at

Walmer on January 30, 1805, and entered the House of Commons

as Lord Mahon in 1831. He took a prominent part in the

foundation of the National Portrait Gallery, and the

Historical Manuscripts Commission, and the promotion of

successful archaeological investigations on the site of Troy.

His literary labours were considerable and important. Chief

among them were the "History of England from the Peace of

Utrecht to the Peace of Versailles," the "History of Queen

Anne's Reign," and the "Life of the Right Honourable William

Pitt." The last named, published in 1861-2, is one of the most

authoritative of political biographies, compiled with a

gravity and care characteristic of its author, and of abiding

value as a standard book of reference for one of the greatest

personalities and one of the most stirring periods of English

history. Earl Stanhope died on December 24, 1875.

_I.--The Boy Statesman_

William Pitt, the elder, afterwards Earl of Chatham, married in 1754

Lady Hester Grenville. William Pitt, their second son, was born on May

28, 1759, at Hayes, near Bromley, in Kent.

In his boyhood, from the earliest years, William Pitt evinced to all

around him many tokens of intellectual promise and ambition; but his

parents were frequently distressed by his delicate health. It was no

doubt on this account that he was not sent to any public or private

school. Lord Chatham was extremely careful of the education of his

family; and, without any disparagement to young William's tutor, it was

certainly from his father that he profited most.

William was at fourteen so forward in his studies that he was sent to

Cambridge, commencing his residence at Pembroke Hall in October 1773.

His health at this period gave cause for great alarm. A serious illness

at Cambridge, however, proved a turning-point; for long afterwards he

enjoyed fairly good health. Early hours, daily exercise on horseback,

and liberal potations of port wine--his elixir of strength at this time,

although it helped in later years to undermine his constitution--made

him far stronger after his illness than before it.

In 1778, after the death of his father, he was entered at Lincoln's Inn,

and was called to the Bar in 1780. But he had little opportunity of

practising as a barrister, for his parliamentary ambitions were soon

fulfilled. In the autumn of 1780 he was an unsuccessful candidate for

Cambridge University; but through the influence of Sir James Lowther he

was returned in the same year for Appleby, and took his seat in the

Commons on January 23, 1781.

Lord North was still at the head of affairs, and the Opposition

consisted of two parties: the aristocratic Whigs, whose leader was the

Marquis of Rockingham, but whose true guiding spirit was Charles James

Fox; and a smaller band of the old adherents of Lord Chatham, under Lord

Shelburne. To this party Pitt, as a matter of course, attached himself.

His first speech was made on February 26, in support of Burke's bill for

economical reform. He completely fulfilled the high expectations that

had been formed of the son of so illustrious a father. Not only did he

please, it may be said that he astonished the House.

Two speeches later in the session confirmed the distinction of the young

orator. In 1782, after a long series of Opposition attacks, Lord North

resigned; but in the new arrangements Pitt was not included. He had

determined that he would serve his sovereign as a cabinet minister, or

not at all. For a time he devoted his efforts, without success, to the

reform of the representation of the House of Commons. But in July 1782

Lord Rockingham died; there was a cabinet split, due to a quarrel

between Fox and Shelburne; the latter became First Lord of the Treasury,

and Pitt, at the age of twenty-three, was offered and accepted the post

of Chancellor of the Exchequer.

The newly-formed ministry was soon exposed to hot attacks by the

coalition of the parties of Fox and North, and Pitt, in attacking this

"baneful alliance," made one of the greatest speeches of his career. But

the ministry was defeated; Lord Shelburne resigned; and the king,

advised by Shelburne, invited Pitt to become Prime Minister. After

anxious consideration he refused.

The Fox and North coalition now assumed office. This union of extremes

was unpopular in the country, although powerful in parliamentary

strength. Pitt tried once more to pass a measure of parliamentary

reform; and during the recess he paid a visit to France--the one foreign

journey of his life.

When parliament resumed its sittings, in the autumn of 1783, Fox's India

Bill was passed by the Commons, but rejected by the Lords. The king, who

was vehemently opposed to the bill, demanded the resignation of Fox and

North, and on December 19 invited Pitt, now aged twenty-four, to become

Prime Minister. This time the invitation was not refused.

Pitt had great difficulty in forming a cabinet, and was the only cabinet

minister in the Commons. His main support in that house was Henry

Dundas, treasurer of the navy--his life-long friend. On facing

parliament at the opening of 1784, Pitt's purpose was to delay a

dissolution until the coalition's unpopularity in the country had

reached its height, and with this end he patiently endured defeat after

defeat. In March he deemed that the right moment had come, and his

judgement was rewarded at the General Election by a triumphant majority.

Pitt was Chancellor of the Exchequer as well as First Lord of the

Treasury, and during the years of peace that followed, his successes

were largely financial. He established a series of financial reforms

that not only increased the favour in which his ministry was held, but

undoubtedly enabled the country to bear the terrible strain that was

afterwards to be placed upon it. In his attempt to adjust commercial

relations with Ireland he was less successful; he was obliged, besides,

to abandon his schemes of parliamentary reform, and his exertions, in

concert with his friend Wilberforce, to destroy the slave traffic ended

in disappointment--even although in this he had the hearty support of

his rival, Fox.

Young as he was, and victorious as he had become, he was never tempted

to presume upon his genius, or relax in his application. He allowed

himself but little holiday. He spent a good deal of such time as he

could spare at Holwood, a property he had bought near Bromley; and

occasional visits to Brighton, and to his mother's residence at Burton

Pynsent, in Somersetshire, made up the greater part of his travels.

_II.--The Regency Problem_

Not only had Pitt's administration rehabilitated English finances; it

had gained for England a strong measure of European support. In 1788

there was concluded what was virtually a triple defensive alliance with

Prussia and Holland; and with France herself, should she be willing to

remain at peace, there was a treaty of commerce to engage her in more

friendly relations.

But towards the end of the year Pitt was confronted with what seemed a

certainty of loss of office. King George III., after a long period of

ill health, was found to be definitely suffering from mental alienation.

A regency became necessary, and the person clearly marked out for the

office was the Prince of Wales. But the prince was the political

associate of Fox, and there was no doubt that his first step on

accession to power would be the dismissal of Pitt.

Pitt saw the prospect before him, and did not attempt to shirk it. But

he did propose certain restrictions on the regency in order that the

king, should he recover his reason, might without difficulty resume his

power.

When parliament assembled in December, Fox declared boldly that the

prince had as much right to assume sovereignty during the king's

incapacity as he would have in the event of the king's death. Pitt,

exulting in his rival's indiscreet departure from Whig principles,

retorted that the assertion of such a right, independent of the decision

of the two houses, was little less than treason to the constitution.

Fox's attitude was unpopular, and Pitt's resolutions, and the Regency

Bill that followed, were carried through the Commons.

Towards the end of February, the third reading of the Regency Bill was

impending in the Lords. Pitt had proposed that the difficulty about

procuring the royal assent to the measure should be overcome by

empowering the chancellor by a joint vote of both houses to put the

Great Seal to a commission for giving the assent. But this expedient was

unnecessary. By February 22 the king was completely recovered. The

Regency Bill fell to the ground, and all the hopes which the Opposition

had reared upon it.

The day of thanksgiving for the king's recovery is regarded by Lord

Macaulay as the zenith in Pitt's political life. "To such a height of

power and glory," he says, "had this extraordinary man risen at

twenty-nine years of age. And now," he adds, perhaps less justly, "the

tide was on the turn."

_III.--The Struggle with France_

Pitt was able to declare, in the session that preceded the dissolution

of 1790, that "we are adding daily to our strength, wealth, and

prosperity," and, as a result of the elections, his parliamentary

majority was more than confirmed.

But symptoms of the coming stress were already manifest. The minister

was anxiously watching the course of the revolution in France; and,

while far from sharing the enthusiasm of Fox for the new principles, he

did not endorse the fierce hostility of Burke.

"I cannot regard with envious eyes," he said, "any approximation in

neighbouring states to those sentiments which are the characteristics of

every British subject."

But the development of events soon made it clear that the new France had

become a danger to the peace of Europe. As long as possible Pitt avoided

war, which was ultimately forced upon him in 1793 by France's attack

upon Holland, to which we were bound by treaty obligations.

From that time, until the peace in 1802, English naval enterprises were

generally successful, and English military enterprises generally failed.

Pitt has often been blamed for the faults of his country's generals; but

it is assuredly true that he did all that a civilian could do to secure

success in the field.

The heavy cost of the war, increased as it was by the subsidies paid to

Austria, and afterwards to Russia, compelled an entire departure from

Pitt's old financial methods. Each year brought an increase of taxation

and an increase of debt; and at the beginning of 1797 the directors of

the Bank of England, in dire perplexity, told Pitt that the state, for

all his expedients, was threatened with insolvency. Pitt did not falter.

An order in council was issued, suspending cash payments at the bank.

Thus was established a gigantic system of paper credit, giving us power

to cope with no less gigantic foes. Cash payments were not resumed until

1819.

Pitt had not only to cope with enemies without, but with sedition

within. Societies formed for propagating the principles of the

revolution advocated the subversion of the constitution under the

pretence of parliamentary reform; the populace, angered by the

privations caused by the clearness of food, listened readily to the

agitators; riots were frequent, but the most mischievous form taken by

sedition was that of armed conspiracy. Against these evils Pitt

contended by royal proclamations, prosecutions, and, above all, by the

suspension of the Habeas Corpus Act. In his firm suppression of disorder

Pitt was loyally supported by large majorities in both houses, and the

country generally was on his side. But his domestic policy, his foreign

policy, and his finance were unsparingly attacked by Fox and a small

band of devoted followers--followers who did not abate in their

resolution when their leader, weary of the unequal conflict, retired for

a time from public life.

In the busy and anxious year 1796, there was a report that Pitt was on

the point of marriage. During his short intervals of leisure at Holwood,

he often visited his neighbour, Lord Auckland, at Beckenham, and was

much attracted by Lord Auckland's eldest daughter, the Hon. Eleanor

Eden. This strong attachment did not proceed to a proposal and a

marriage. Pitt wrote to Lord Auckland avowing his affection, but

explaining that in the circumstances of pecuniary difficulty in which he

was involved, he would not presume to make the lady an offer. Lord

Auckland acknowledged the explanation as adequate, and thus honourably

ended the only "love-passage" in the life of Pitt.

Considering that Pitt's income as minister was £6,000 a year, and that

he derived an additional £3,000 a year from the Lord Wardenship of the

Cinque Ports, his pecuniary troubles may seem hard to explain. He had no

family, and no expensive tastes. But he was so intent upon the national

exchequer that he neglected his private accounts, with the consequence

that he was plundered by his domestics. His expenses were not checked,

and his debts continued to grow.

_IV.--Resignation_

In the year 1800 Pitt was able to achieve a momentous change in the

affairs of Ireland. The chronic discontent of that country, largely due

to the resentment of the Catholics at their exclusion from the rights of

citizenship, had been fanned by the importation of revolutionary ideas;

and there were hopes, once or twice on the point of realisation, of a

French invasion of the island. In 1798 a rebellion broke out, but was

suppressed with promptness, and, it must be added, in many instances

with cruelty. But to Pitt the suppression of the insurrection was only

the first part of his duty. He thought that to revert to the old system

would be a most shallow policy. A new, and comprehensive, and healing

method must be tried--an Act of Union, which should raise the minds of

Irishmen from local to imperial aims--which should blend the two

legislatures, and, if possible, also the two nations, in one.

In 1800 the project was fulfilled--not without fierce resistance in the

Irish Parliament, and not without a certain distribution of favours to

those for whose support the government was anxious; although the

allegations made on this subject seem to be exaggerated. Having

accomplished the union, Pitt laid plans for a further reform which led,

early in the following year, to his retirement from office.

He proposed the emancipation of the Catholics by the substitution of a

political for the religious test of fitness for citizenship. Although

the Anglican bishops and clergy and many laymen were strongly opposed to

Catholic emancipation, Pitt would probably have been able to carry his

scheme had it not been for royal antagonism. The king believed,

erroneously but passionately, that by consenting to such a measure he

would violate his coronation oath.

His majesty expressed his opinions on the subject so publicly and so

vehemently that on January 31, 1801, Pitt felt compelled to ask leave to

resign unless he were allowed to pursue his course on the Catholic

question. The king required the abandonment of the scheme, and on

February 3 Pitt resigned office. Thus abruptly ended his renowned

administration of more than seventeen years.

The new Prime Minister was Mr. Addington, formerly Speaker of the

Commons. Several of Pitt's colleagues remained in the ministry, although

others withdrew from it; and Pitt himself gave general support to the

government--support which was offered with especial warmth, and

possessed especial value, during the hotly criticised peace negotiations

with the First Consul Bonaparte in 1801 and 1802. Although Pitt had been

obliged when in office to refuse several inadequate offers of peace, he

had always been prepared to end the war under honourable conditions. The

distinction of ending the war did not fall to his share; but his

services were not forgotten. On May 7, 1802, the House of Commons

carried by overwhelming numbers a motion, "That the Right Hon. William

Pitt has rendered great and important services to his country, and

especially deserves the gratitude of this house." And on May 28, 1802,

Pitt's birthday, more than 800 persons assembled at a memorable banquet

in honour of "the pilot that weathered the storm."

Until the renewal of war in 1803 Pitt took little-part in public

affairs. Most of his time was spent at Walmer Castle, with occasional

visits to Bath for the sake of his health, which had been uncertain

since an attack of serious illness in 1797. He remained in constant

communication with his political friends, and sometimes during the

earlier part of his retirement aided the ministry with his advice. But

with the progress of time he found himself less and less able to support

Addington and his colleagues.

In May 1803 the uneasy peace came to an end. The constant aggressions of

Bonaparte and his dominating tone made friendly relations impossible.

There was a widespread feeling in the country that now that the storm

had recommenced the old pilot should be called to the helm. Pitt

returned to the Commons after the declaration of war, and forcibly

criticised some of the financial and defensive measures of the ministry.

In 1804 the ministry showed itself wholly unequal to the strain upon it;

and the situation was complicated by a temporary return of the king's

malady. Pitt not only renewed his opposition to Addington, but made it

plain that he was prepared to take part in a strong and comprehensive

administration, including even Fox, that should be formed to rescue the

crown and country from the dangers to which they were exposed under the

Addington ministry.

A series of combined attacks was directed against the government during

the month of April. Although Addington was not defeated in the Commons,

he saw his majority steadily diminish; and on April 26 he resolved to

resign. On the 30th, the Lord Chancellor intimated to Pitt his majesty's

desire to receive the plan of a new administration.

_V.--The Last Ministry_

The king's opposition made the inclusion of Fox in the new ministry

impossible. His hostility to Fox, however, was not simply on political

grounds; he believed him to be responsible for the excesses of the

Prince of Wales. Pitt was in consequence obliged to be content with a

restricted choice of ministers, and had to face a powerful opposition in

parliament. Addington was persuaded to join the ministry early in 1805.

During the summer of 1804 Bonaparte and his host lay menacingly at

Boulogne, awaiting that command of the channel "for six hours," which

the great warrior recognised as essential to his plans. Meanwhile, Pitt

laboured to form another coalition, and, at the cost of heavy subsidies,

was successful. Russia, Austria, and Sweden joined in the league against

Napoleon; Prussia still hesitated.

In the summer of 1805 Napoleon was again at Boulogne, but his plan of

invasion was wrecked by the failure of the French fleet to reach the

Channel. When Napoleon learned that the fleet had gone south, and that

the attack upon England had been thwarted, he straightway marched his

army to mid-Europe. Pitt had staked everything on the new coalition, and

the surrender of the Austrians at Ulm was news of the utmost bitterness

to him. But a splendid corrective came soon afterwards in the crowning

naval victory of Trafalgar. Although the nation's feelings were divided

between joy at the triumph and grief at the death of the illustrious

victor, Pitt's popularity, which had been somewhat uncertain, was

enormously enhanced by the event. The Lord Mayor proposed his health as

"the saviour of Europe."

Pitt's reply was nearly as follows: "I return you many thanks for the

honour you have done me, but Europe is not to be saved by any single

man. England has saved herself by her exertions, and will, I trust, save

Europe by her example." With only these two sentences the minister sat

down. They were the last words that Pitt ever spoke in public.

He was suffering much at this time from gout, and his general health was

undermined by anxiety. In December he journeyed to Bath, and at Bath

there reached him the news of the destruction of his coalition at

Austerlitz. The battle was the cause of his death. He was struck down by

a severe internal malady and he was in a state of extreme debility when

on January 11, 1806, he returned home to the house he had taken on

Putney Heath. It is said that as he passed along to his bedroom, he

observed a map of Europe hanging on the wall, upon which he turned to

his niece and mournfully said: "Roll up that map. It will not be wanted

these ten years."

For a few days the doctors had hopes that he might recover, but on the

22nd it became evident that he could not live for twenty-four hours.

Early in the morning of the 23rd he died.

"At about half-past two," wrote the Hon. James Hamilton Stanhope, who

was at his bedside, "Mr. Pitt ceased moaning, and did not make the

slightest sound for some time. Shortly afterwards, in a tone I never

shall forget, he exclaimed: 'Oh, my country! How I love my country!'

From that time he never spoke or moved, and at half-past four expired

without a groan or struggle. His strength being quite exhausted, his

life departed like a candle burning out."

* * * * *

The World's Greatest Books — Volume 10 — Lives and Letters · 第 48 / 66 题