Memoirs

Francois, Duc de la Rochefoucauld, was born in Paris on

September 15, 1613. Sprung from one of the noblest families of

France, handsome, winning, and brave to recklessness, he

intrigued and fought against Richelieu and Mazarin, and was

one of the leaders in the civil war of La Fronde. But though

marked by birth and talent for a high position in the state,

he failed in nearly everything he undertook, owing to his

extraordinary indolence of mind, and in the prime of his life

he became a rather embittered spectator of a world in which he

was not able to make his way. The "Memoirs," with their

studied tone of historical coldness, present a striking

contrast to the brilliant vivacity of the "Maxims." This, in

all probability, is due to the fact that while the latter were

frequently added to and edited during their author's lifetime,

no such fate befell the "Memoirs," of which the first edition,

published without La Rochefoucauld's authority, appeared in

1662. Barely a third of them could be attributed to their

reputed author, the work being compiled mainly from various

commonplace books. In spite of La Rochefoucauld's protests,

the pirated "Memoirs" continued to be printed, and it was not

until very many years after his death, in 1817, that an

authentic edition made its appearance. The "Memoirs" are of

great literary value, yielding in interest to no memoirs of

the time. La Rochefoucauld died in Paris on March 17, 1680.

_Court Intrigues_

King Louis XIII. was of feeble constitution, further impaired by

over-exertion in hunting. His temperament was severe and solitary; he

wished to be governed, but was sometimes impatient of government. His

mind took note only of details, and his knowledge of war was fit rather

for a subordinate officer than for a king. Cardinal Richelieu, who owed

all his elevation to the queen-mother, Marie de Médicis, was ruler of

the state. His vast and penetrating mind formed projects as bold as he

was personally timid. His policy was to establish the king's authority

and his own, by the ruin of the Huguenots and of the great houses of the

kingdom, and then to attack the house of Austria, a power most

redoubtable to France. He stuck at nothing, either to advance his

satellites or to destroy his enemies. The passion which he had long

cherished for the queen had changed to dislike, and she had an aversion

for Richelieu. The king was embittered against her by jealousy and by

the sterility of their marriage. The queen was an amiable woman, without

falsity of any kind, and with many virtues; her intimate friend was

Madame de Chevreuse, who was of her own age and of kindred sentiments.

But Madame de Chevreuse almost always brought misfortune to those whom

she interested in her projects. She had much spirit, ambition, and

beauty, and made full use of her charms to forward these enterprises of

hers. Already Cardinal Richelieu had accused the queen and her of

complicity in Chalais's plot against the king's life--for Chalais had

been her warm admirer--and the king believed in their guilt to the end

of his days. Again, when the young and handsome Lord Holland came to

France to arrange the marriage of the King of England to the sister of

the King of France, and quickly won the affection of Madame de

Chevreuse, the two lovers thought fit to celebrate their attachment by

inspiring a similar intrigue between the French queen and the Duke of

Buckingham, who had not so much as met one another. This astonishing

undertaking was successful. Buckingham came over to wed madame in the

name of his master, and his ardent love for the queen, which she fully

returned, deeply wounded both the king and Richelieu. The cardinal

sought his revenge through Lady Carlisle. That haughty and jealous

woman, to whom Buckingham had long been attached, noticed one night at a

ball in England that he was wearing diamonds which she had not seen

before, and contrived, unobserved, to detach them, in order that she

might send them to Richelieu. These diamonds had been the gift of the

King of France to his queen, and it was intended that the cardinal, by

showing them to the king, should prove the queen's weakness. But the

Duke of Buckingham discovered his loss the same night, and at once

suspected Lady Carlisle's design. He issued an immediate order that the

English ports should be closed, and that no one should be permitted,

under whatever pretext, to leave the country; and then, having had

exactly similar jewels prepared, he sent them to the Queen of France,

with an account of the whole matter.

It was at this time that the cardinal formed the project of the

destruction of the Huguenot party, and of laying siege to La Rochelle.

The Duke of Buckingham came with a powerful fleet to aid La Rochelle,

but in vain; the fortress was taken, and the duke was assassinated in

England. This murder gave the cardinal an inhuman joy; he jested at the

queen's sorrows, and began to hope again.

After the ruin of the Huguenots I returned from the army to court, being

now seventeen years old, and began to notice the state of affairs. The

queen-mother and the cardinal were at enmity, and though everyone saw

that something would come of it, no one could foretell what would

happen. The cardinal's situation was precarious, the king had learned of

his love for the queen, and was quite ready to disgrace him, and even

asked the queen-mother to nominate someone to replace him. She

hesitated, and that hesitation was her ruin and saved the cardinal.

The reversal of the situation took place on the famous "day of dupes,"

on which the queen-mother, presuming too much on her power, challenged

the cardinal, in the king's presence, with his ingratitude and

treacheries. No one doubted but that Richelieu's day was over, and the

whole court crowded to the queen-mother to share her imaginary triumph.

But the king went the same day to Versailles, and the cardinal followed

him; the queen, fearing that she would find Versailles dull and

uncomfortable, remained behind; and the wily statesman made such good

use of his opportunity that the king's consent was won to the downfall

of his mother. She was soon arrested, and her sorrows lasted as long as

her life.

Many were implicated in her ruin, and were exiled or thrown into the

Bastille, or brought to the scaffold; and so much bloodshed and so many

fortunes reversed brought odium on the name of Richelieu. The mild

regency of Marie de Médicis was remembered, and all the great families

lamented that liberty was a thing of the past.

For my part, I thought that the queen's cause was the only one, which an

honourable man could follow. She was unhappy; the cardinal was rather

her tyrant than her lover; she had been good to me, and had trusted me;

Mademoiselle d'Hautefort, with whom I had great friendship, was her

friend, too--sufficient reasons, these, to dazzle a youth who had seen

almost nothing of the world, and to turn his steps in a direction quite

contrary to his interests. King and cardinal alike soon came to detest

me, and my life thenceforth was troubled by the visitations of their

displeasure. In recording the scenes in which I have had a part, I have

no intention of writing history, but only of touching on a few personal

episodes.

_Richelieu's Death_

War was declared in 1635 against the King of Spain, and I accompanied

the French army of twenty thousand men which marched to the support of

the Prince of Orange in Flanders. During neither this nor the following

winter was I allowed at court. Madame de Chevreuse, who had been sent to

Tours on the occasion of Richelieu's triumph had heard a good account of

me from the queen, and invited me to see her; we soon struck up a very

great friendship, and I came to be a confidential intermediary between

the queen and her, and was often entrusted by one or other of them with

most perilous commissions.

When I was at last readmitted to court in 1637, I found the queen in

great trouble. She had been accused of a crime against the state, a

treasonable understanding with the Spanish minister; some of her

servants were arrested; the chancellor examined her like a criminal; it

was even proposed to seclude her at Havre, annul her marriage, and

repudiate her altogether. In this extremity, abandoned by all the world,

she proposed that I should kidnap her and Mademoiselle d'Hautefort and

carry them off to Brussels. Difficult and dangerous as this project was,

it gave me greater joy than any I had known, for I was at an age when a

man likes to engage in dashing and heroic feats. Happily, however, the

chancellor's investigations proved her majesty not guilty.

But an unfortunate series of accidents led to my imprisonment for a week

in the Bastille. A signal had been agreed upon between the queen and

Madame de Chevreuse during the recent trouble. If all went well, Madame

de Chevreuse was to receive a prayer-book bound in green, but a red

binding was to indicate disaster. I never knew which of the two ladies

made the mistake, but when the queen was acquitted Madame de Chevreuse

received what she took to be the signal of misfortune; concluded that

both she and the queen were undone, and disguising herself as a man, she

fled to Spain. This escapade, so surprising at the very moment when the

Queen's troubles had come to an end, inspired the king and the cardinal

with the gravest suspicions that they had not, after all, fathomed her

majesty's treachery. The cardinal summoned me to Paris, and hinted at

unpleasant consequences if I did not reveal all I knew. I knew nothing;

and as my manner seemed more reserved and dry than he was accustomed to,

I was sent to the Bastille.

The little time that I spent there showed me more vividly than anything

I had yet seen the picture of vengeance. I saw there men of great names

and of great merits, an infinite number of men and women of all ranks in

life, all unhappy in the affliction of long and cruel incarceration. The

sight of so many pitiable creatures did much to increase my natural

hatred for Cardinal Richelieu's administration. I was released in eight

days, and thought myself very fortunate to escape at a period when none

others were set at liberty.

But my disgrace was well repaid. The queen showed herself gratefully

aware of all that I had suffered in her service; Mademoiselle

d'Hautefort gave full expression to her esteem and friendship; and

Madame de Chevreuse was not less gracious. I enjoyed not only the favour

of those to whom I was attached, but also a certain approval which the

world is not slow to give to the unfortunate whose conduct has not

really been disgraceful. Under these conditions an exile of two or three

years from court was not intolerable. I was young; the king and the

cardinal were failing in health; I had everything to hope for from a

change. I was happy in my family, and enjoyed all the pleasures of

country life, and the neighbouring provinces were full of other exiles.

Cardinal Richelieu died on December 4, 1642. Although his enemies could

only rejoice at finding themselves free at last from so many

persecutions, the event has shown that the state could ill spare him. He

had made so many changes in public affairs that he alone was able to

direct them safely. No one before Richelieu had known all the power of

the kingdom, or had been able to gather it all up into the hands of the

sovereign. The severity of his adminstration had cost many lives; the

nobility had been humbled, and the common people had been loaded with

taxes; but the grandeur of his political designs, such as the taking of

La Rochelle, the destruction of the Huguenot party, and the weakening of

the house of Austria, no less than his intrepidity in carrying them out,

have secured for his memory a justly-merited fame.

_Under Mazarin's Rule_

I returned to Paris immediately after the death of Richelieu, thinking

that I might have occasion to serve the queen. In accordance with the

late cardinal's will, Cardinal Mazarin succeeded to his powers. The

king's state of health went from bad to worse, and the court was filled

with intrigues with regard to the regency which must so soon be

appointed. His death took place on May 14, 1643. The queen at once

brought her little son, Louis XIV., to Paris; two days later she was

declared regent in parliament; and the same evening, to the amazement of

his enemies, she appointed Cardinal Mazarin chief of the council.

Mazarin's mind was great, industrious, insinuating, and artful, and his

character was so supple that he could become as many different men as he

had occasion to personate. But he was shortsighted even in his grandest

projects; and, unlike his predecessor, whose mind was bold but his

temperature timid, Mazarin was bolder in temper than in conception. A

pretended moderation veiled his ambition and his avarice; he said he

wanted nothing for himself.

The court was now divided between the Duke of Beaufort and the cardinal,

and it was expected that the return of Madame de Chevreuse would incline

the queen to the former party. But the queen was in no hurry for that

lady's return, knowing well what turmoils she was apt to bring in her

train. Perhaps I urged her recall more boldly than was wise; at any

rate, I won my point, and her majesty sent me to form Madame de

Chevreuse for her appearance at court under the new conditions.

I represented to her how indispensable Cardinal Mazarin was to the

state; that he was accused of no crime, and was guiltless of Richelieu's

oppressions; and that the most fatal course she could take would be to

attempt to govern the queen. Madame de Chevreuse promised to follow my

advice, and came up to court, but her old instincts of domination were

too much for her, and she soon declared herself openly against the

minister who enjoyed all the queen's confidence. She even attempted his

overthrow, and for that purpose united herself to the party known as the

"_Importans_," which was led by the Duke of Beaufort.

After various manoeuvres on the part of the cardinal and of Madame de

Chevreuse to get the upper hand, Mazarin discovered a plot against his

life, in which the Duke of Beaufort was implicated, and had the duke

arrested and imprisoned. At the same time Madame de Chevreuse was sent

away to Tours, and as I was unwilling to promise that I would have no

more to do with her, I lost the favour of the queen, provoked the

cardinal's displeasure, and soon found that Madame de Chevreuse herself

was forgetful of all I had done for her.

Kept in idleness, tantalised by promises of office which were never

fulfilled, and forbidden even to follow the wars, my wretched position

led me at last to seek some way of showing my resentment at the

treatment I had received from the queen and cardinal. The means were at

hand. Like many others, I had come under the spell of the beauty and

charm of Madame de Longueville, and thus come gradually into association

with the party of the Fronde. I followed the Duke of Enghien, her

brother, to the attack on Courtray, then to Mardick, where I was

wounded; and this time of military service united me more closely to his

later interests.

By the year 1647 everyone was weary of Mazarin's rule. His bad faith,

his weakness, and his trickiness were becoming known, provinces and

towns alike were groaning under taxation, and the citizens of Paris were

reduced to mere despair. Parliament tried respectful remonstrances in

vain; the cardinal thought himself safe in the servility of the nation.

But the great majority in France desired a change, and then smouldering

discontent soon burst into a flame.

The Duke of Enghien, who had become, by the death of his father, Prince

of Condé, had gained in 1648 a great victory in Flanders, and a solemn

thanksgiving was held in Notre Dame to celebrate it. Mazarin chose this

moment for the arrest of Broussel and other members of parliament who

had voiced most urgently the public distress. The action roused Paris to

a fury which astonished him; the people sought him to tear him to

pieces; barricades were erected in the streets, and the king and queen

were besieged in the royal palace. Resistance to the parliament's

demands were at the moment impossible; the prisoners had to be released.

I was at this time absent from Paris, having been sent down by the queen

to my government at Poitou, which I had purchased; the province was

almost in insurrection and I had to pacify it. I happened to be deeply

wounded by a new slight which Cardinal Mazarin had put upon me, when

Madame de Longueville sent for me to come to Paris, informing me that

the whole plan for a civil war had been drawn up, and asking for my

counsel in the matter. The news delighted me, and I arrived at the

capital eager for my revenge on the queen and the cardinal.

Mazarin, on the other hand, had formed his plan. Realising that Paris

was unsafe, he determined to leave it, to place the king at

Saint-Germain, and to lay siege to the city, which would soon be reduced

to famine and dissensions. Their escape was made at midnight on the eve

of Epiphany, 1649, all the court following in great disorder.

The city was for a time in much perplexity, but the arrival of the Duke

of Beaufort, who had broken prison at Vincennes, put heart into the

people, who took him for their liberator. Other great personages threw

in their lot with the popular cause; a large war-chest was quickly

raised and troops were levied, and the parliament of Paris put itself

into communication with the other parliaments of the kingdom. All

preparations were made for a civil war, the real basis of which was a

general hatred of Cardinal Mazarin, which was common to both parties. In

an early engagement outside the city I was so gravely wounded as to see

no more of this war, the events of which are hardly worth narrating. On

April 1, 1649, the Parliament received an amnesty from the king. Neither

party had vanquished the other; the cardinal and the parliament were

each as strong as before, but everyone was glad to be rid, for the time,

of the horrors of civil war.

_Wars of the Fronde_

The Prince of Condé, who had great influence in the council, showed

himself so contemptuous to Mazarin, and became so inconvenient to the

queen by his arrogance that she decided to arrest him, and to involve

Madame de Longueville, the duke, her husband, and the Prince of Conti in

the same disgrace. Accordingly, on January 18, 1650, the Prince of

Condé, the Duke of Longueville, and the Prince of Conti were seized and

imprisoned at Vincennes, and the order was given at the same time to

arrest Madame de Longueville and myself. But we succeeded in escaping

together to Dieppe, where we were forced to separate; Madame de

Longueville found refuge at Stenay, where she met with Turenne, and I

returned to my government of Poitou and formed an alliance there with

the Duke of Bouillon, Turenne's brother. Together the duke and I matured

designs which led to the civil war in the south.

My father having died at Verteuil in March, 1650, I succeeded to the

title of Duke of La Rochefoucauld. I invited a large number of nobles

and gentlemen of that region to the funeral ceremonies; our plans were

put before them; though some of them held back, most were favourable;

and I soon found myself at the head of a force of two thousand horse and

eight hundred foot. The Duke of Bouillon and I were joined by the young

Princess of Condé, with her son the Duke of Enghien; we gathered more

troops at Turenne, and marched upon Bordeaux. After overcoming some

opposition, the princess entered that city in triumph on May 31, 1650,

and we joined her a few days later.

The grievance of the princess and the presence of her son excited the

liveliest enthusiasm, and the party opposed to Mazarin had entire

mastery of the town. The revolt of Bordeaux carried with it almost all

Guienne, and Mazarin determined to crush it before it should extend to

the neighbouring provinces. A royal army of veterans was sent down,

Bordeaux was closely invested, an obstinate defence was made, but the

town had to capitulate on September 28, on the condition of an amnesty

to the princess and her adherents.

Meanwhile Turenne, with a Spanish force, had made a vain attempt to

rescue the captive princes, and Mazarin had removed them to Havre, where

the government was devoted to him. There was now such general dread and

hatred of the cardinal, that people were willing to unite with those

whom they had considered their mortal enemies in order to secure his

ruin. In the early days of 1651 I was summoned to Paris by the Princess

Palatine, who united a taste for gallantry with a remarkable talent for

intrigue, and remained for some time hidden in her house, where I was

witness to many consultations for the removal of Mazarin from power. I

even made a last attempt to persuade the cardinal himself to release the

princes; in four nocturnal interviews I tried to show him how all

parties were uniting to compass his ruin, but was unable to convince him

without betraying secrets which were not my own. Mazarin gave me no hope

of their liberation.

Then arose a general storm against the minister, and he made his escape

on the night of February 7. The queen would have followed him with her

son, but the Frondeurs and the partisans of the princes kept her

prisoner in her palace. Without any hope of assistance, and daunted day

and night by an infuriated populate, she sent for me and gave me an

order to the governor of Havre to release the princes immediately. I

warned the leaders of the Fronde that her sincerity was not above

suspicion, and that all depended upon her close imprisonment, and so set

out along the northern road upon my mission. But the cardinal had been

beforehand with me, the princes were at liberty, and on February 16 they

entered Paris in triumph.

Mazarin, who had fled to Cologne, whence he continued to direct the

queen's cabinet, returned to France at the head of a small army in

January, 1652, and arrived at Poitiers without meeting any resistance.

The party opposed to him was rent by faction and strife, but the Prince

of Condé united it, and fought an indecisive engagement with the royal

troops on April 8. On the 11th the prince and I were well received in

Paris, but it was evident that the citizens were weary of all these

troubles, desired nothing so much as the king's return, and detested the

ambition of the leaders of faction. Indeed, the magistrates were

negotiating with Mazarin, and declared the city neutral. On July 2 the

Prince of Condé was marching his force from Saint-Cloud to Charenton

when he was attacked by Turenne; and in the sanguinary combat which

followed, and in which I was fighting beside the prince, I received a

wound in the head which prevented my taking any further part in these

disturbances.

Shortly afterwards, the Prince of Condé, his popularity wholly gone,

took service under the King of Spain; King Louis XIV., amid general

acclamations, returned to Paris on October 21; and Cardinal Mazarin,

having overcome all his enemies, entered the capital in a veritable

triumph, in February, 1653.

* * * * *

The World's Greatest Books — Volume 10 — Lives and Letters · 第 40 / 66 题