CHAPTER XXXV.

=FIRST ADMINISTRATION OF CLEVELAND, 1885–1889.=

IMPORTANT MEASURES AND REFORMS.

=620. Character of the Administration.=—Ever since Grant’s

administrations the strength of the two great political parties had been

tending more and more to an equality. When Cleveland entered upon his

duties as President, the Democrats had a small majority in the House of

Representatives, the Republicans still had a majority in the Senate.

Legislation, therefore, was for the most part confined to non-partisan

measures. Cleveland surrounded himself with a good group of Cabinet

advisers, in which the South was allowed proportionate

representation.[286] The latter fact, together with his policy of

vetoing private pension bills, rendered the President unpopular with

many Union veterans; but his general firmness and honesty as an

executive were admitted by impartial observers. He was placed, however,

in the unfortunate situation of having to offend either the Democrats,

who demanded that all offices should be taken away from Republican

incumbents and given to Democrats, or the Independents, who thought that

removals from office should be made only in the case of unworthy

incumbents. Cleveland extended Civil Service reform, but at the same

time made some removals from office apparently on partisan grounds. Thus

he offended both Democratic politicians and Independent reformers; and

his administration, while on the whole successful, was not characterized

by thorough harmony.

[Illustration: GROVER CLEVELAND.]

=621. The Australian Ballot.=—Cleveland’s first administration was not

only marked by the improvement in the Civil Service consequent upon the

President’s extending the number of offices to be filled by persons who

had passed competitive examinations, but was also distinguished by a

reform which helped greatly to purify elections. In order to secure the

secret voting necessary to lessen intimidation and bribery of voters,

the Australian ballot was adopted in several of the states. The

essential principle of this ballot is that all the candidates’ names

shall be printed upon a single sheet of paper, and that the voter,

taking this official paper from the supervisor of the election, shall,

in a booth by himself, secretly mark the name of the person or persons

for whom he votes, and then, after folding the ballot, return it to the

officer to be inserted in the ballot box. The method met with popular

approval and was adopted, in the course of a few years, in nearly all

the states.

=622. The Presidential Succession Act, and the Electoral Count

Act.=—Two measures intended to obviate possible complications in

Presidential elections were adopted during this administration. Before

1886 there was no law to determine how the Presidency should be filled

in case of the death or disability of the President, the Vice President,

and the Acting President of the Senate.[287] It was now determined by

statute that the succession should pass from the Vice President to the

members of the Cabinet, eligible in the order in which the several

departments were created, beginning with the Secretary of State. The

following year (1887) the Electoral Count Act determined that disputes

relating to the validity of electoral votes should be settled by state

tribunals.

=623. Interstate Commerce Act.=—The rapid growth of individual and

corporate wealth in the country led to an impression on the part of very

many people that the profits of industry were not fairly distributed.

This feeling was greatly increased by the multiplication of corporations

and trusts. Railways were everywhere tending to combine into great lines

and to enter into agreements that were supposed to endanger competition

and sometimes even to prevent it. It was also in their power to make

such discriminating rates for freight between different manufacturing

corporations and between different towns and cities as to favor some and

injure others. This condition led to strikes and riots at various

points, and it became evident to the leaders of both parties that

remedial legislation was called for. The result was the passing of an

act for the better regulation of Interstate Commerce. Railroads

exclusively within an individual state could not, under the Constitution

of the United States, be interfered with; but the act forbade

discriminating rates and the pooling of earnings and rates on roads

running partly in one state and partly in another. It also created an

Interstate Commerce Commission of five members, with authority to decide

such questions under the act as might arise between the railroads and

their patrons, and to make an annual report on actual conditions. The

Commission, however, was not given power to enforce its decisions, and,

consequently, it failed to accomplish all the good that had been

anticipated; but many abuses were corrected. Individual states, also, in

many cases enacted laws limiting the rates for carrying freight and

passengers.

INDUSTRIAL AND FINANCIAL DISTURBANCES.

=624. Anti-Chinese Laws.=—The strikes and other disorders prevalent

during this period in many parts of the country were generally

attributed to ignorant foreigners, who had not yet become accustomed to

American laws. Immigration brought in a large number of discontented,

disheartened, and reckless people from Europe. Efforts were now made to

reduce the number of such persons; but little was done except to take

still harsher measures against a more or less inoffensive people from

Asia (§ 603). In 1885 twenty-seven Chinamen were murdered by miners in

Wyoming because they refused to join in a strike. As the Chinese could

not vote, nobody seemed afraid to favor a measure for their exclusion.

In 1888, therefore, a more stringent law was passed prohibiting their

immigration into the country. It was not very perfectly drawn, however,

and was easily evaded by immigration through Canada and in other

ways.[288]

=625. The Chicago Anarchists.=—Unmistakable evidences of discontent

among the laboring classes continued to alarm the country. Various

organizations of workmen were formed, the most conspicuous of which was

the “Knights of Labor,” with upwards of a million members. A great

strike took place in St. Louis in the Spring of 1886, but the most

violent outbreak occurred in Chicago, May 4, 1886. A riot of anarchists,

mostly foreigners, resulted in the killing of a number of policemen by

bombs thrown in Haymarket Square. Four leading rioters were executed.

Others were imprisoned, but were pardoned in 1893 by Governor Altgeld of

Illinois. Though a reaction immediately took place against violence of

an anarchistic kind, discontent throughout the country went on

increasing. Perhaps the lessons taught by the Chicago tragedy were best

taken to heart by those philanthropists who began establishing

“settlements” among the poor of the great cities and in other ways

labored to improve their condition.

=626. Pension Vetoes.=—Both political parties had been inclined to

pursue a liberal policy in regard to military pensions. The debt of

gratitude to the old soldiers and sailors was so generally felt that

whenever a proposition to extend the pension list was made, very few

politicians seemed willing to oppose it. The consequence was, that the

liberality of Congress seemed to many persons, including the President,

to be running into folly and extravagance. The pension list was costing

the Treasury about one hundred million dollars a year, and Cleveland

determined to resist its increase. He vetoed so large a number of

pension bills, including a specially liberal one known as the Dependent

Pension Bill (1887), that efforts to extend the lists were discouraged.

=627. Accumulation in the Treasury.=—In the course of Cleveland’s

administration the silver coined under the Bland-Allison law (§ 604) was

but slightly circulated, and the income of the government from tariff

and internal revenue largely exceeded the expenses. All the bonds that

were due had been paid, and the interest on the national debt had been

greatly reduced. In consequence there was an accumulation of a very

large sum of money in the Treasury. The President was strongly of the

opinion that financial distress would result from continuance of a

tariff producing a surplus that kept so much money from circulation and

tempted congressmen to make large appropriations for pensions and for

less worthy objects. Accordingly, in a special message of December,

1887, he recommended a policy of tariff reform in the interests of freer

trade. As the Senate was still Republican, he could not have hoped that

Congress would at once pass such a measure as he recommended and as the

House agreed to when it passed a reduced tariff act, known as the “Mills

Bill,” from its chief framer, Roger Q. Mills of Texas. Cleveland’s

message was designed to place the matter before the country in such a

way that it would become the main issue at the next Presidential

election. In this purpose he was successful, although the “Mills Bill”

failed in the Senate.

=628. Election of Harrison and Morton.=—The Republicans at their

convention held at Chicago in 1888, nominated, for President, Benjamin

Harrison[289] of Indiana, a grandson of President William Henry

Harrison, and for Vice President, Levi P. Morton of New York. The

Democrats met at St. Louis and renominated Cleveland, who was strong

with the masses of the party, although unpopular with the politicians.

Allen G. Thurman, formerly senator from Ohio, was nominated for Vice

President. At the end of a vigorous campaign, conducted almost

exclusively on the tariff issue, but marked by the circulation of

misleading statements and the corrupt use of money,[290] Harrison had

two hundred and thirty-three electoral votes, and Cleveland one hundred

and sixty-eight. As in 1884, the election was decided by the thirty-five

electoral votes of the state of New York.

* * * * *

REFERENCES.—See bibliographical note to Chapter XXXIV. Add:

Appleton’s _Annual Cyclopædia_ for the years under

consideration.

-----

[286] That the North and South were forgetting their differences was

proved during Cleveland’s administration in two striking ways. In 1885

ex-Confederate generals attended Grant’s funeral; the next year, the

sufferings of the people of Charleston, South Carolina, on account of

the earthquake that so damaged the city, called forth great sympathy and

help from the people of the North and West.

[287] President Arthur had urged the necessity of such a law, and the

death of Vice President Hendricks in 1885 made the need of it still more

impressive.

[288] In 1892 the “Geary Act” authorized the expulsion from the country

of any Chinese who could not show that they had been admitted without

violation of law. The government, however, did not strictly enforce this

act.

[289] Born in Ohio, 1833; died, 1899. Graduated at Miami University,

1852; settled in Indianapolis as a lawyer; volunteered in 1862 and was

advanced to brevet brigadier general; elected to the United States

Senate, where he served from 1881 to 1887; nominated and elected

President in 1888; renominated in 1892, but was defeated at the polls by

Cleveland; retired, at the end of his term, to the practice of the law

at Indianapolis.

[290] There was a large amount of money raised and used by the

Republicans for campaign purposes, and it was charged by the Democrats

that much of this fund was employed in purchasing votes, especially in

Indiana. Counter charges of a similar nature were brought against the

Democrats; and it is clear that the people at large believed the

election to have been a discreditable one to both parties, since the

adoption of better ballot laws by the states was accelerated (§ 621).

A History of the United States(#52766) · 第 4 / 9 章