CHAPTER. XIII.

OF THE SUBORDINATION OF THE POWERS OF THE COMMON-WEALTH.

Sect. 149. THOUGH in a constituted commonwealth, standing upon its own

basis, and acting according to its own nature, that is, acting for the

preservation of the community, there can be but one supreme power, which

is the legislative, to which all the rest are and must be subordinate,

yet the legislative being only a fiduciary power to act for certain

ends, there remains still in the people a supreme power to remove or

alter the legislative, when they find the legislative act contrary to

the trust reposed in them: for all power given with trust for the

attaining an end, being limited by that end, whenever that end is

manifestly neglected, or opposed, the trust must necessarily be

forfeited, and the power devolve into the hands of those that gave it,

who may place it anew where they shall think best for their safety and

security. And thus the community perpetually retains a supreme power of

saving themselves from the attempts and designs of any body, even of

their legislators, whenever they shall be so foolish, or so wicked, as

to lay and carry on designs against the liberties and properties of the

subject: for no man or society of men, having a power to deliver up

their preservation, or consequently the means of it, to the absolute

will and arbitrary dominion of another; when ever any one shall go about

to bring them into such a slavish condition, they will always have a

right to preserve, what they have not a power to part with; and to rid

themselves of those, who invade this fundamental, sacred, and

unalterable law of self-preservation, for which they entered into

society. And thus the community may be said in this respect to be always

the supreme power, but not as considered under any form of government,

because this power of the people can never take place till the

government be dissolved.

Sect. 150. In all cases, whilst the government subsists, the legislative

is the supreme power: for what can give laws to another, must needs be

superior to him; and since the legislative is no otherwise legislative

of the society, but by the right it has to make laws for all the parts,

and for every member of the society, prescribing rules to their actions,

and giving power of execution, where they are transgressed, the

legislative must needs be the supreme, and all other powers, in any

members or parts of the society, derived from and subordinate to it.

Sect. 151. In some commonwealths, where the legislative is not always in

being, and the executive is vested in a single person, who has also a

share in the legislative; there that single person in a very tolerable

sense may also be called supreme: not that he has in himself all the

supreme power, which is that of law-making; but because he has in him

the supreme execution, from whom all inferior magistrates derive all

their several subordinate powers, or at least the greatest part of them:

having also no legislative superior to him, there being no law to be

made without his consent, which cannot be expected should ever subject

him to the other part of the legislative, he is properly enough in this

sense supreme. But yet it is to be observed, that tho’ oaths of

allegiance and fealty are taken to him, it is not to him as supreme

legislator, but as supreme executor of the law, made by a joint power of

him with others; allegiance being nothing but an obedience according to

law, which when he violates, he has no right to obedience, nor can claim

it otherwise than as the public person vested with the power of the law,

and so is to be considered as the image, phantom, or representative of

the commonwealth, acted by the will of the society, declared in its

laws; and thus he has no will, no power, but that of the law. But when

he quits this representation, this public will, and acts by his own

private will, he degrades himself, and is but a single private person

without power, and without will, that has any right to obedience; the

members owing no obedience but to the public will of the society.

Sect. 152. The executive power, placed any where but in a person that

has also a share in the legislative, is visibly subordinate and

accountable to it, and may be at pleasure changed and displaced; so that

it is not the supreme executive power, that is exempt from

subordination, but the supreme executive power vested in one, who having

a share in the legislative, has no distinct superior legislative to be

subordinate and accountable to, farther than he himself shall join and

consent; so that he is no more subordinate than he himself shall think

fit, which one may certainly conclude will be but very little. Of other

ministerial and subordinate powers in a commonwealth, we need not speak,

they being so multiplied with infinite variety, in the different customs

and constitutions of distinct commonwealths, that it is impossible to

give a particular account of them all. Only thus much, which is

necessary to our present purpose, we may take notice of concerning them,

that they have no manner of authority, any of them, beyond what is by

positive grant and commission delegated to them, and are all of them

accountable to some other power in the commonwealth.

Sect. 153. It is not necessary, no, nor so much as convenient, that the

legislative should be always in being; but absolutely necessary that the

executive power should, because there is not always need of new laws to

be made, but always need of execution of the laws that are made. When

the legislative hath put the execution of the laws, they make, into

other hands, they have a power still to resume it out of those hands,

when they find cause, and to punish for any maladministration against

the laws. The same holds also in regard of the federative power, that

and the executive being both ministerial and subordinate to the

legislative, which, as has been shewed, in a constituted commonwealth

is the supreme. The legislative also in this case being supposed to

consist of several persons, (for if it be a single person, it cannot but

be always in being, and so will, as supreme, naturally have the supreme

executive power, together with the legislative) may assemble, and

exercise their legislature, at the times that either their original

constitution, or their own adjournment, appoints, or when they please;

if neither of these hath appointed any time, or there be no other way

prescribed to convoke them: for the supreme power being placed in them

by the people, it is always in them, and they may exercise it when they

please, unless by their original constitution they are limited to

certain seasons, or by an act of their supreme power they have adjourned

to a certain time; and when that time comes, they have a right to

assemble and act again.

Sect. 154. If the legislative, or any part of it, be made up of

representatives chosen for that time by the people, which afterwards

return into the ordinary state of subjects, and have no share in the

legislature but upon a new choice, this power of chusing must also be

exercised by the people, either at certain appointed seasons, or else

when they are summoned to it; and in this latter case the power of

convoking the legislative is ordinarily placed in the executive, and has

one of these two limitations in respect of time: that either the

original constitution requires their assembling and acting at certain

intervals, and then the executive power does nothing but ministerially

issue directions for their electing and assembling, according to due

forms; or else it is left to his prudence to call them by new elections,

when the occasions or exigencies of the public require the amendment of

old, or making of new laws, or the redress or prevention of any

inconveniencies, that lie on, or threaten the people.

Sect. 155. It may be demanded here, What if the executive power, being

possessed of the force of the commonwealth, shall make use of that

force to hinder the meeting and acting of the legislative, when the

original constitution, or the public exigencies require it? I say, using

force upon the people without authority, and contrary to the trust put

in him that does so, is a state of war with the people, who have a right

to reinstate their legislative in the exercise of their power: for

having erected a legislative, with an intent they should exercise the

power of making laws, either at certain set times, or when there is need

of it, when they are hindered by any force from what is so necessary to

the society, and wherein the safety and preservation of the people

consists, the people have a right to remove it by force. In all states

and conditions, the true remedy of force without authority, is to oppose

force to it. The use of force without authority, always puts him that

uses it into a state of war, as the aggressor, and renders him liable to

be treated accordingly.

Sect. 156. The power of assembling and dismissing the legislative,

placed in the executive, gives not the executive a superiority over it,

but is a fiduciary trust placed in him, for the safety of the people, in

a case where the uncertainty and variableness of human affairs could not

bear a steady fixed rule: for it not being possible, that the first

framers of the government should, by any foresight, be so much masters

of future events, as to be able to prefix so just periods of return and

duration to the assemblies of the legislative, in all times to come,

that might exactly answer all the exigencies of the commonwealth; the

best remedy could be found for this defect, was to trust this to the

prudence of one who was always to be present, and whose business it was

to watch over the public good. Constant frequent meetings of the

legislative, and long continuations of their assemblies, without

necessary occasion, could not but be burdensome to the people, and must

necessarily in time produce more dangerous inconveniencies, and yet the

quick turn of affairs might be sometimes such as to need their present

help: any delay of their convening might endanger the public; and

sometimes too their business might be so great, that the limited time of

their sitting might be too short for their work, and rob the public of

that benefit which could be had only from their mature deliberation.

What then could be done in this case to prevent the community from being

exposed some time or other to eminent hazard, on one side or the other,

by fixed intervals and periods, set to the meeting and acting of the

legislative, but to intrust it to the prudence of some, who being

present, and acquainted with the state of public affairs, might make use

of this prerogative for the public good? and where else could this be so

well placed as in his hands, who was intrusted with the execution of the

laws for the same end? Thus supposing the regulation of times for the

assembling and sitting of the legislative, not settled by the original

constitution, it naturally fell into the hands of the executive, not as

an arbitrary power depending on his good pleasure, but with this trust

always to have it exercised only for the public weal, as the occurrences

of times and change of affairs might require. Whether settled periods of

their convening, or a liberty left to the prince for convoking the

legislative, or perhaps a mixture of both, hath the least inconvenience

attending it, it is not my business here to inquire, but only to shew,

that though the executive power may have the prerogative of convoking

and dissolving such conventions of the legislative, yet it is not

thereby superior to it.

Sect. 157. Things of this world are in so constant a flux, that nothing

remains long in the same state. Thus people, riches, trade, power,

change their stations, flourishing mighty cities come to ruin, and prove

in times neglected desolate corners, whilst other unfrequented places

grow into populous countries, filled with wealth and inhabitants. But

things not always changing equally, and private interest often keeping

up customs and privileges, when the reasons of them are ceased, it often

comes to pass, that in governments, where part of the legislative

consists of representatives chosen by the people, that in tract of time

this representation becomes very unequal and disproportionate to the

reasons it was at first established upon. To what gross absurdities the

following of custom, when reason has left it, may lead, we may be

satisfied, when we see the bare name of a town, of which there remains

not so much as the ruins, where scarce so much housing as a sheepcote,

or more inhabitants than a shepherd is to be found, sends as many

representatives to the grand assembly of law-makers, as a whole county

numerous in people, and powerful in riches. This strangers stand amazed

at, and every one must confess needs a remedy; tho’ most think it hard

to find one, because the constitution of the legislative being the

original and supreme act of the society, antecedent to all positive laws

in it, and depending wholly on the people, no inferior power can alter

it. And therefore the people, when the legislative is once constituted,

having, in such a government as we have been speaking of, no power to

act as long as the government stands; this inconvenience is thought

incapable of a remedy.

Sect. 158. Salus populi suprema lex, is certainly so just and

fundamental a rule, that he, who sincerely follows it, cannot

dangerously err. If therefore the executive, who has the power of

convoking the legislative, observing rather the true proportion, than

fashion of representation, regulates, not by old custom, but true

reason, the number of members, in all places that have a right to be

distinctly represented, which no part of the people however incorporated

can pretend to, but in proportion to the assistance which it affords to

the public, it cannot be judged to have set up a new legislative, but to

have restored the old and true one, and to have rectified the disorders

which succession of time had insensibly, as well as inevitably

introduced: For it being the interest as well as intention of the

people, to have a fair and equal representative; whoever brings it

nearest to that, is an undoubted friend to, and establisher of the

government, and cannot miss the consent and approbation of the

community; prerogative being nothing but a power, in the hands of the

prince, to provide for the public good, in such cases, which depending

upon unforeseen and uncertain occurrences, certain and unalterable laws

could not safely direct; whatsoever shall be done manifestly for the

good of the people, and the establishing the government upon its true

foundations, is, and always will be, just prerogative, The power of

erecting new corporations, and therewith new representatives, carries

with it a supposition, that in time the measures of representation might

vary, and those places have a just right to be represented which before

had none; and by the same reason, those cease to have a right, and be

too inconsiderable for such a privilege, which before had it. ’Tis not a

change from the present state, which perhaps corruption or decay has

introduced, that makes an inroad upon the government, but the tendency

of it to injure or oppress the people, and to set up one part or party,

with a distinction from, and an unequal subjection of the rest.

Whatsoever cannot but be acknowledged to be of advantage to the society,

and people in general, upon just and lasting measures, will always, when

done, justify itself; and whenever the people shall chuse their

representatives upon just and undeniably equal measures, suitable to the

original frame of the government, it cannot be doubted to be the will

and act of the society, whoever permitted or caused them so to do.

Second Treatise of Government · 第 13 / 19 章