CAPS AT CAMBRIDGE.

(Vol. ix., p. 27.)

The extract from an unpublished MS. given by A REGENT M.A. OF CAMBRIDGE

refers to the year 1620, as will appear from the following passages in

Anthony à Wood's _Hist. and Antiq. of Univ. of Oxford_.

"1614.--In the latter end of the last and beginning of this year, a

spirit of sedition (as I may so call it) possessed certain of the

Regent Masters against the Vicechanc. and Doctors. The chief and only

matter that excited them to it was their sitting like boys,

bare-headed, in the Convocation-House, at the usual assemblies there,

which was not, as 'twas thought, so fit, that the Professors of the

Faculty of Arts (on which the University was founded) should, all

things considered, do it. The most forward person among them, named

Henry Wightwicke, of Gloucester Hall, having had some intimation of a

statute which enabled them to be covered with their caps, and

discovering also something in the large west window of St. Mary's

Church, where pictures of Regents and non-Regents were sitting covered

in assemblies before the Chancellor, clapt {131} on his cap, and spared

not to excite his brethren to vindicate that custom, now in a manner

forgotten; and, having got over one of the Regents to be more zealous

in the matter than himself, procured the hands of most, if not all, of

them to be set to a petition (in order to be sent to the Chancellor of

the University), for the effecting and bringing about the matter. But

the Vicechancellor, Dr. Singleton, having had timely notice of the

design, sends a full relation of the matter to the Chancellor;

whereupon answer was returned, that he should deal therein as he should

think fit. Wightwicke, therefore, being called into question for

endeavouring to subvert the honour and government of the University,

whereby he ran himself into perjury (he having before taken an oath to

keep and maintain the rites, customs, and privileges of the

University), was banished, and his party, who had proved false to him,

severely checkt by the Chancellor.

"At length Wightwicke's friends, laying open to him the danger that he

would run himself into, if he should not seek restauration and submit,

did, after his peevish and rash humour had been much courted to it, put

up a petition (subscribed in his behalf by the Bishop of London and Sir

John Bennett) to the Chancellor of the University for his restauration,

which being with much ado granted, but with this condition, that he

make an humble recantation in the Convocation, sent to his

Vicechancellor what should be done in the matter, and among other

things thus:--'For the manner of his submission and recognition which

he is to make, I will not take upon me to direct, but leave yt wholy

unto your wisdomes, as well for manner as for the matter; only thus

much generally I will intimate unto you, that the affront and offence

committed by Whittwicke in the Congregation House by his late insolent

carriage there was very great and notorious, and that offence

afterwards seconded and redoubled by another as ill or worse than the

former, in his seditious practizing and procuring a multitude of

handes, thereby thinking to justifie and maintain his former errors,

and his proud and insolent disobedience and contempt. I hold yt

therefore very requisite that his submission and recognition, both of

the one fault and of the other, should be as publique and as humble as

possibly with conveniencye may bee. Which being thus openly done, as I

hope yt will bee a good example to others, to deter them from

committing the like offence hereafter, so I do also wishe this his

punishment may be only _ad correctionem et non ad destructionem_."

"This being the effect of the Chancellor's mind, Wightwicke was

summoned to appear to make his submission in the next Convocation,

which being held 25 June this year, he placed himself in the middle of

St. Mary's chancel, and spoke with an audible voice as followeth:

"'Ornatissime Domine Procancellarie, vosque Domini Doctores

pientissimi, quotquot me vel banniendum vel bannitionem meam ratam esse

voluistis ut vobis omnibus et singulis innotescat discupio: me Henricum

Whitwicke pileum coram Domino Vicecancellario Thoma Singleton capiti

haud ita pridem imposuisse, quod nemini Magistrorum in Congregatione

vel Convocatione [in presentia Domini Vicecancellarii aut Doctoris

alicujus] licere fateor. Scitote quæso prætereà, me supradictum

Henricum à sententia Domini Vicecancellarii ad venerabilem Domum

Congregationis provocasse, quod nec licitum nec honestum esse in causa

perturbationis pacis facilè concedo. Scitote denique me solum, manus

Academicorum egregiè merentium Theologia Baccalaureorum et in Artibus

Magistrorum in hac corona astantium Collegiatim et Aulatim cursitando

rescripto apponendas curasse, in quibus omnibus Præfectis [summe]

displicuisse, in pacem almæ hujus Academiæ et in dignissimum nostrum

Procancellarium deliquisse, parum nolenti animo confiteor, et

sanctitates vestras humillimè imploro, ut quæ vel temerè et inconsultò,

vel volenter et scienter feci, ea, ut deceat homines, condonentur.

'HENRICUS WIGHTWICKE.'

Which submission or recognition being ended, he was restored to his

former state, and so forthwith reassumed his place. But this person,

who as lately beneficed at Kingerbury in Lincolnshire, could never be

convinced, when he became Master of Pembroke College, forty-six years

after this time, that he made any submission at all, but carried the

business on and effected it against all the University; as to his young

acquaintance that came often to visit him and he them (for he delighted

in boyish company), he would, after a pedantical way, boast, supposing

perhaps that, having been so many years before acted, no person could

remember it; but record will rise up and justify matters when names and

families are quite extirpated and forgotten among men. Pray see more of

this cap-business in the year 1620."

"1620.--In the beginning of Michaelmas Term following, the

cap-business, mentioned an. 1614, was renewed again: for some

disrelishment of the former transactions remaining behind, the Regent

Masters met together several times for the effecting their designs. At

length, after much ado, they drew up a petition subscribed by

fifty-three of the senior Masters for this year, and presented it to

one whom they knew would not be violent against them, as Dr. Singleton

was before. The beginning of it runs thus:

"'Reverendissimo Viro Domino Doctori Prideaux ornatissimo hujus

Academiæ Vicecan. digniss, &c.

"'Multa jamjudum sunt (reverendissime Vicecancellarie) quæ ab

antiquis hujus Academiæ institutis salubriter profecta, mala tandem

consuetudo, et in pejus potens aut abrogavit penitus aut pessime

corrupit, &c.'

"Among those that subscribed to it were these following, that

afterwards became persons of note, viz, Gilbert Sheldon, Alexand. Gill,

jun., and Anthony Farndon, of Trinity Coll.; Pet. Heylin of Magd. Coll.

[Robert Newlin of C. C. C., &c.]. The chief solicitor of the business

was Rous Clopton of Corpus Ch. Coll., a restless, busy person, and one

afterwards as much noted for his infamy as any of the former for their

learning or place. This petition, I say, being presented to Dr.

Prideaux the Vicechancellor, and he considering well their several

reasons for their sitting covered (one of which was that they were

Judges in Congregations and Convocations), sent it to the Chancellor to

have his consent, who also, after he had considered of it, wrote a

letter to the Vicechancellor, to {132} be communicated to the

Convocation: the chief contents of which are these:

"'After my very harty commendations, I doe take this manner of

proceeding by the Regent Masters (for their sitting covered at

Congregations and Convocations) in soe good part, that although I

might well take some time to advise before I give answer,

especially when I consider how long that custom hath continued, how

much it hath been questioned, and that upon a long debate it hath

been withstood by so grave and wise a Counsellor of State as your

late Chancellor, my immediate predecessor; yet, when I weigh their

undoubted right, their discreet and orderly proceedings to seek it,

not to take it, the chief, if not the only, cause why it was

formerly denied; the good congruity this doth beare, not with

Cambridge alone (though that were motive enough), but all other

places, it being no where seen that those that are admitted Judges

are required to sit bare-headed; I cannot choose but commend and

thus farre yield to theire request as to referre it to the

Convocation House. I hope no man can have cause to think that I

have not the power to continew this custom as well as some others

of my predecessors, if I had a mind to strive; nor that I seek

after their applause in yielding them that now, which hath been so

long kept from them, but the respect I have to their due, to the

decency of the place, and honour of the University, which I cannot

conceive to bee anyway diminished, but rather increased, by their

sitting covered, are the only reasons that have moved me, and

carried me to so quick a resolution, wherewith you may acquaint the

Convocation House with this also, that what they shall conclude I

shall willingly agree to. And soe I doe very hartely take leave,

and rest

Your assured loving friend,

PEMBROOKE.

Baynard's Castle,

this 4 of December, 1620.'

Which letter being publickly read in a Convocation held 20 Dec., it was

then agreed upon by the consent of all there present, that all Masters

of what condition soever might put on their caps in Congregations and

Convocations, yet with these conditions: That in the said assemblies

the said Masters should use only square caps, and not sit bare, or

without cap. And if any were found faulty in these matters, or that

they should bring their hats in the said Assemblies, they should not

only lose their suffrages for that time, but be punished as the

Vicechancellor should think fit. Lastly, it was decreed, under the said

conditions and no otherwise, that in the next Congregation in the

beginning of Hilary Term, and so for ever after, all Masters, of what

condition soever, whether Regents or not Regents, should, in

Congregations and Convocations, put on and use square caps.

"All that shall be said more of this matter is, that the loss of using

caps arose from the negligence of the Masters, who, to avoid the pains

of bringing their caps with them, would sit bare-headed; which being

used by some, was at length followed by all, and so at length became a

custom."

It would seem, from Lord Pembroke's letter, that the right of the senate of

this university to wear their caps had not been questioned.

Notes and Queries, Number 224, February 11, 1854 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 79 / 131 题