CHAPTER III

SPECIES AND THEIR DIVISIONS IN DOMESTIC BIRDS

The three general classes of domestic birds include few species but many

varieties, and, outside of the distinct varieties, an indefinite number

of individual types. Where varieties are as numerous as in the fowl,

which has about three hundred, and the pigeon, which has a much greater

number, the differences between them are often very slight. Sometimes

the form of a single small character is the only distinguishing feature.

But, if this is a fixed character, the variety is distinct. Where there

are so many varieties it is hard to make short, appropriate descriptive

names for all, if considered simply as varieties. For such diversity

there must be a more extended classification. Such a classification,

growing gradually with the increase in the number of varieties, will not

be consistent throughout. Hence to understand clearly the relations of

the artificial divisions of species in domestication we must know what a

species is and how these divisions arise.

=Definition of species.= Species are the natural divisions of living

things. Each plant and animal species retains its distinctive character

through long ages because the individuals composing it can produce

perfect offspring only (if asexual) of themselves, or (if bisexual) with

others of their species.

The self-isolation of species is well illustrated when similar plants

grow together, as grasses in the same field and practically on the same

spot; yet year after year all the old kinds are found and no new ones

such as might come from a mixture of two kinds, if they would mix. In

the higher animals, where the parent forms are of different sexes, they

choose mates of their own kind, and so each species remains distinct;

but if in a species there are many different types, such as we find in

domestic fowls, the members of the species, when free to do so, mate as

readily with types quite different from their own as with individuals

exactly like them, and produce offspring of intermediate types with all

the essential characters of the species. In domestication individuals of

distinct yet similar species are sometimes mated and produce offspring

called hybrids, but these are sterile. The mule, which is a hybrid

between the ass and the mare, is the most familiar animal of this kind.

Hybrid, or mule, cage birds are produced by crossing the canary with

several allied species. Among other domestic birds hybrids are almost

unknown.

=Origin of species.= Until near the close of the last century it was

commonly believed that each species had been created in perfect form and

that species were unchangeable; but long before that time some keen

students of the natural sciences and close observers of the changes that

take place in plants and animals in domestication had discovered that

species were not perfectly stable and were changing slowly. Geologists

established the fact that the earth, instead of being only a few

thousand years old, had existed for countless centuries. Among fossil

remains of creatures unlike any now known they had found also other

forms which appeared to be prototypes of existing species. The idea that

the forms of life now on the earth had come from earlier and somewhat

different forms had occurred to several scientists more than a hundred

years ago, but it was not until about 1860 that a satisfactory

explanation of progressive development of forms of life was given to the

world. This mode of creation is called evolution.

The theory of evolution is that partly through their own inherent

tendency to vary and partly through the influence of external things

which affect them, all organisms change slowly; that things of the same

kind, separated and living under different conditions, may in time so

change that they become separate species; and that this process may be

repeated indefinitely, the number of species constantly increasing and

becoming more diversified and more highly developed.

Such a theory would not be entitled to serious consideration unless it

was known that the earth was millions of years old, because we know that

races of fowls separated for over three thousand years (and perhaps

twice as long) and developed into quite different varieties will breed

together as readily as those of the same variety. But when it is certain

that the earth is so old that there has been ample time for changes in

living forms that would require periods of time beyond our

comprehension, some of the relations of varieties and species of birds

have an important bearing on the theory of evolution.

As in the case of fowls just noted, we find that domestic ducks of the

same species, after a separation of several thousand years, breed freely

together. But our domestic ducks are not, like the fowls, all of the

same species, and if individuals of different species are paired they

produce only a few weak hybrids. Our domestic geese are probably

descended from two wild varieties, but races that were not brought

together for thousands of years after they were domesticated are

perfectly fertile together, while when mated with the American Wild

Goose, which is not domesticated but will breed in captivity, they

produce only hybrids. The general resemblance between geese and ducks is

very striking, yet they will not breed together at all.

A comparison of these facts indicates that while three thousand, or even

five or six thousand, years of separation may not be enough to break

down the natural affinity of varieties of the same species, separation

and difference of development will eventually make of varieties distinct

species, a union of which will produce only hybrids, while a longer

separation and further increase of differences makes the break between

the species absolute and they will not breed together at all.

=Natural varieties.= A species having developed as a variety of an

earlier species will continue to develop as one variety or as several

varieties, according to conditions. If a part of a species becomes so

separated from the rest that intercourse ceases, each division of the

species may become a well-defined variety.

=Varieties in domestication.= How a species when domesticated breaks up

into varieties is well illustrated by the case of the fowl. The original

wild species has long disappeared, but there is good reason to suppose

that in size and color it was something between a Brown Pit Game and a

Brown Leghorn. The birds were smaller than most fowls seen in this

country to-day. The prevailing color was a dull brown, because that

color best conceals a small land bird from its enemies. Fowls that were

domesticated and given good care and an abundance of food would usually

grow larger than the wild stock. Thus if any person, or the people

generally in any community, systematically gave their fowls good care, a

variety of unusual size would be developed.

Different colors would also appear in the flocks of fowls, because the

birds of unusual colors would be protected and preserved, instead of

being destroyed as they usually are in the wild state. Other

peculiarities, too, such as large combs, crests, and feathered legs,

would be developed in some lands and neglected in others. This is how it

happened that after thousands of years in domestication the races of

fowls in different parts of the world were quite different in size and

form, but alike in being of many colors.

From a species in this condition modern poultry breeders have made

hundreds of distinct varieties. The easiest method of making a variety

in domestication is to select specimens for breeding as near the desired

type as possible, and to breed only from a few individuals in each

generation which come nearest to the ideal type. In this way a variety

that breeds quite true to the type may be established in from three or

four to eight or ten years, according to the number of characters to be

established as distinctive of the variety. Varieties are also made by

crossing unlike individuals. This process is longer than the other, and

sometimes requires a series of crosses to produce specimens

approximating the ideal sought. After such specimens have been obtained

the method is the same as in the first case. A variety is commonly

considered to be well established when the greater part of the specimens

produced are easily identified as of that variety. But no domestic

variety is ever established in the sense that a species is. All are

artificial, produced by compulsory separation and preserved only as long

as it is continued.

=Classification of domestic varieties of birds.= Domestic varieties of

all kinds of live stock were at first mostly shape-varieties; that is,

the individuals of a variety were alike in shape but of various colors.

This is the case still with some varieties. These shape-varieties are

mostly the common types of certain countries or districts. Thus the

Leghorn fowl is the common fowl of Italy, and the Houdan is a type

common in a small district in France. Such shape-varieties are called

_breeds_. When other types were made by crossing such breeds they also

were called breeds.

When people first began to be interested in the improvement of live

stock, the popular idea of a breed was that it was a domestic species,

and there are still many people who hold this view. This popular

misconception of the nature of a breed is responsible for much of the

inconsistency and confusion in the ordinary classifications of domestic

varieties. To it also is due the use of the term "variety" to apply

especially to color-varieties, which are the principal divisions of

breeds.

In the classification of domestic birds a _variety_ is properly a

color-variety of a breed. Thus in the Plymouth Rock breed there are six

color-varieties--barred, white, buff, partridge, silver-penciled, and

ermine (called Columbian); and in Fantail Pigeons there are six

color-varieties--white, blue, black, red, yellow, and silver. Birds of

the same breed (shape) and the same variety (color) may differ in some

other character, as the form of the comb or the presence or absence of

feathers in certain places. In accordance with such differences

varieties are divided into _subvarieties_. Thus, in Leghorn Fowls the

brown, white, and buff varieties have single-combed and rose-combed

subvarieties.

In any breed, variety, or subvariety certain families are sometimes

distinguished for general or special excellence of form or color. Such a

family is called a _strain_.

=Systematic mixtures of breeds and varieties.= Although so many distinct

varieties have been developed from common domestic stocks, the improved

races do not always displace the mongrels. When the old mongrels

disappear their place is often taken by a new mongrel stock produced by

mixtures of the distinct breeds with each other and with the old mongrel

race. The greater part of such stock is so mixed that its relation to

any established breed could not be determined or expressed, but

systematic mixtures are sometimes made, and to describe these the

following terms are used: _Crossbred_--having parents of different,

distinct breeds, varieties, or subvarieties. A Leghorn male mated with a

Cochin female produces offspring each of which is in blood one half

Leghorn and one half Cochin. _Grade_--having more than half of the blood

of a breed.

If the offspring of a cross such as is described in the preceding

paragraph are mated with birds of one of the parent breeds, the

offspring of this mating will have three fourths of the blood of that

breed. If these in turn are mated to birds of the same pure breed, the

offspring will have seven eighths of the blood of that breed. Animals

bred in this way are called _grades_ until the process has been carried

so far that they are practically pure-bred. Mongrel stock is often

graded up in this way. As a rule stock that is seven eighths pure is not

distinguishable from average pure stock of the same breed.

=Pure-bred, thoroughbred, and standard-bred.= A _pure-bred_ animal is,

strictly speaking, one having the blood only of the variety to which it

belongs. From what has been said of the making of breeds and varieties

it is plain that absolute purity of blood is not a universal attribute

of well-bred domestic birds. A _thoroughbred_ animal is one that is

thoroughly bred for some purpose or to some type. A _standard-bred_

animal is one that is bred especially to conform to requirements agreed

upon by breeders and exhibitors.

A great deal of misapprehension and confusion in the use of these terms

has been caused by the attitude of those who maintain that the term

"thoroughbred," having been used as a name for highly bred running

horses, cannot properly apply to any other kind of live stock, and that

"pure-bred" should apply to all thoroughly bred races. The noun

"Thoroughbred" is the name of a breed of horses. The adjective

"thoroughbred" is common property. Writers on aviculture who wish to be

accurate prefer it in many instances to "pure-bred" because absolute

purity of blood is rare and is not of the importance in breeding that

novices usually suppose. Not only are many new varieties made by

crossing, but in long-established breeds outcrosses are regularly made

to restore or intensify characters.

To illustrate the use of the three terms in application to a single

breed: A stock of Light Brahmas might be kept pure for half a century,

yet at the end of that period might have changed its type entirely. It

might be so deteriorated that it was worth less than common mongrels;

yet it is pure-bred stock. Another stock of the same variety might be

bred for table qualities, egg-production, and the same principal

color-characteristics of the variety, but without attention to the fine

points of fancy breeding. Such a stock is thoroughbred but not

standard-bred.

Our Domestic Birds: Elementary Lessons in Aviculture · 第 3 / 22 章