CHAPTER III.

THE MEXICAN WAR

[1836]

Attracted by fertility of soil and advantages for cattle-raising, large

numbers of Americans had long been emigrating to Texas. By 1830 they

probably comprised a majority of its inhabitants. March 2, 1836, Texas

declared its independence of Mexico, and on April 10th of that year

fought in defence of the same the decisive battle of San Jacinto. Here

Houston gained a complete victory over Santa Anna, the Mexican

President, captured him, and extorted his signature to a treaty

acknowledging Texan independence. This, however, as having been forced,

the Mexican Government would not ratify.

[1845]

Not only did the Texans almost to a man wish annexation to our Union,

but, as we have seen, the dominant wing of the democratic party in the

Union itself was bent upon the same, forcing a demand for this into

their national platform in 1840. Van Buren did not favor it, which was

the sole reason why he forfeited to Polk the democratic nomination in

1844. Polk was elected by free-soil votes cast for Birney, which, had

Clay received them, would have carried New York and Michigan for him and

thus elected him; but the result was hailed as indorsing annexation.

Calhoun, Tyler's Secretary of State, more influential than any other one

man in bringing it about, therefore now advocated it more zealously than

ever. Calhoun's purpose in this was to balance the immense growth of the

North by adding to southern territory Texas, which would of course

become a slave State, and perhaps in time make several States. As the

war progressed he grew moderate, out of fear that the South's show of

territorial greed would give the North just excuse for sectional

measures.

[Illustration: Portrait.]

General Sam. Houston.

Henry Clay, with nearly the entire Whig Party, from the first opposed

the Tyler-Calhoun programme. Clay's own reason for this, as his

memorable Lexington speech in 1847 disclosed, was that the United States

would be looked upon "as actuated by a spirit of rapacity and an

inordinate desire for territorial aggrandizement." His party as a whole

dreaded more the increment which would come to the slave power. After

much discussion in Congress, Texas was annexed to the Union on January

25, 1845, just previous to Polk's accession. June 18th, the Texan

Congress unanimously assented, its act being ratified July 4th by a

popular convention. Thus were added to the United States 376,133 square

miles of territory.

[Illustration: Portrait.]

General Santa Anna.

The all-absorbing question now was where Texas ended: at the Nueces, as

Mexico declared, or at the Rio Grande, as Texas itself had maintained,

insisting upon that stream as of old the bourne between Spanish America

and the French Louisiana. Mexico, proud, had recognized neither the

independence of Texas nor its annexation by the United States, yet would

probably have agreed to both as preferable to war, had the alternative

been allowed. To be sure, she was dilatory in settling admitted claims

for certain depredations upon our commerce, threatened to take the

annexation as a casus belli, withdrew her envoy and declined to accept

Slidell as ours, and precipitated the first actual bloodshed. Yet war

might have been averted, and our Government, not Mexico's, was to blame

for the contrary result. Slidell played the bully, the navy threatened

the coast, our wholly deficient title, through Texas, to the

Nueces-Rio-Grande tract was assumed without the slightest ado to be

good, and when General Arista, having crossed the river in Taylor's

vicinity, repelled the latter's attack upon him, the President, followed

by Congress, falsely alleged war to exist "by act of the Republic of

Mexico."

[1846]

During most of 1845, General Zachary Taylor was at Corpus Christi on the

west bank of the Nueces, in command of 3,600 men. The first aggressive

movement occurred in March of the following year, when Taylor, invading

the disputed territory by command from Washington, advanced to the Rio

Grande, opposite Matamoras. April 26th, a Mexican force crossed the

river and captured a party of American dragoons which attacked them.

Taylor drew back to establish communication with Point Isabel, and on

advancing again toward the Rio Grande, May 8th, found before him a

Mexican force of nearly twice his numbers, commanded by Arista. The

battle of Palo Alto ensued, and next day that of Resaca de la Palma,

Taylor completely victorious in both. May 13th, before knowledge of

these actions had reached Washington, warranted merely by news of the

cavalry skirmish on April 26th, Congress declared war, and the President

immediately called for 50,000 volunteers. In July Taylor was re-enforced

by Worth, and proceeded to organize a campaign against Monterey, a

strongly fortified town some ninety miles toward the City of Mexico.

This place was reached September 19th, and captured on the 22d, after

hard fighting and severe losses on both sides. An armistice of eight

weeks followed.

[Illustration: Portrait.]

James K. Polk, after a photograph by Brady.

[Illustration: Map.]

PLAN OF THE BATTLE OF BUENA VISTA MORNING 23 OF FEB 1847.

[1847]

Meantime a revolution had occurred in Mexico. The banished Santa Anna

was recalled, and as President of the Republic assumed command of the

Mexican armies. On February 23, 1847, occurred one of the most

sanguinary but brilliant battles of the war, that of Buena Vista.

Taylor, learning that a Mexican force was advancing under Santa Anna, at

least double the 5,200 left him after the requisition upon him which

General Scott had just made, drew back to the strong position of Buena

Vista, south of Saltillo. Here Santa Anna, having through an intercepted

despatch learned of Taylor's weakness, ferociously fell upon him with a

force 12,000 strong. On right and centre, by dint of good tactics and

bull-dog fighting, Taylor held his own and more, but the foe succeeded

at first in partly turning and pushing back his left. The Mexican

commander bade Taylor surrender, but was refused, whence the saying that

"Old Rough and Ready," as they called Taylor, "was whipped but didn't

know it."

To check the flanking movement he sent forward two regiments of

infantry, well supported by dragoons and artillery, who charged the

advancing mass, broke the Mexicans' column, and sent them fleeing in

confusion. This saved the day. The American loss was 746, including

several officers, among them Lieutenant-Colonel Clay, son of the

Kentucky statesman. Colonel Jefferson Davis, one day to be President of

the Southern Confederacy, caused during this conflict great havoc in the

enemy's ranks with his Mississippi riflemen. Santa Anna's loss was

2,000.

[Illustration: Portrait.]

General Winfield Scott.

General Winfield Scott had meantime been ordered to Mexico as chief in

command. Taylor was a Whig, and the Whigs whispered that his martial

deeds were making the democratic cabinet dread him as a presidential

candidate. But Scott was a Whig, too, and if there was anything in the

surmise, his victorious march must have given Polk's political household

additional food for reflection. Scott's plan was to reduce Vera Cruz,

and thence march to the Mexican capital, two hundred miles away, by the

quickest route. Vera Cruz capitulated March 27, 1847.

Scott straightway struck out for the interior. He was bloodily opposed

at Cerro Gordo, April 18th, and at Jalapa, but he made quick work of the

enemy at both these places. In the latter city, after his victory, he

awaited promised re-enforcements. When the last of these had arrived,

August 6th, under General Franklin Pierce, so that he could muster about

14,000 men, he advanced again. August 10th the Americans were in sight

of the City of Mexico. This was a natural stronghold, and art had added

to its strength in every possible way. Except on the south and west it

was nearly inaccessible if defended with any spirit. Scott of course

directed his attack toward the west and south sides of the city. The

first battle in the environs of the capital was fiercely fought near the

village of Contreras, and proved an overwhelming defeat for the

Mexicans. Two thousand were killed or wounded, while nearly 1,000,

including four generals, were captured, together with a large quantity

of stores and ammunition. The American loss was only 60 killed and

wounded.

The survivors fled to Churubusco, farther toward the city, where, with

every advantage of position, Santa Anna had united his forces for a

final stand. An old stone convent, which our artillery could not reach

till late in the action, was utilized as a barricade, and from this the

Mexicans poured a most deadly fire upon their assailants. The Americans

were victorious, as usual, but their loss was fearful, 1,000 being

killed or wounded, including 76 officers. A truce to last a fortnight

was now agreed upon, but Scott, seeing that the Mexicans were taking

advantage of it to strengthen their fortifications, did not wait so

long. He now had about 8,500 men fit for duty, and sixty-eight guns.

Hostilities were renewed September 7th, by the storm and capture,

costing nearly 800 men, of Molino del Rey, or "King's Mill," a mile and

a half from the city.

Possession of the Molino opened the way to Chapultepec, the Gibraltar of

Mexico, 1,100 yards nearer the goal. As it was built upon a rock 150

feet high, impregnable on the north and well-nigh so on the eastern and

most of the southern face, only the western and part of the southern

sides could be scaled. But the stronghold was the key to the city, and

after surveying the situation, a council of war decided that it must be

taken. Two picked American detachments, one from the west, one from the

south, pushed up the rugged steeps in face of a withering fire. The

rock-walls to the base of the castle had to be mounted by ladders. This

was successfully accomplished; the enemy were driven from the building

back into the city, and the castle and grounds occupied by our troops. A

large number of fugitives were cut off by a force sent around to the

north.

[Illustration: The Plaza of the City of Mexico.]

[1848]

To pierce the city was even now by no means easy. The approach was by

two roads, one entering the Belen gate, the other the San Cosme. General

Quitman advanced toward the Belen, but at the entrance was stopped by a

destructive cannonade from the citadel itself. Those fighting their way

toward the San Cosme succeeded in entering the city, Lieutenant U. S.

Grant making his mark in the gallant work of this day. The city was

evacuated that night, and on the 15th of September, 1847, was fully in

the hands of Scott.

The treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo was signed on February 2, 1848. It

established the Rio Grande as the boundary between the two countries,

and New Mexico, of course including what is now Arizona and also

California, was ceded to the United States for $15,000,000. The United

States also assumed, to the sum of $3,250,000, the claims of American

citizens upon Mexico. For Gadsden's Purchase, in 1853, between the Gila

River and the Mexican State of Chihuahua, we paid $10,000,000 more. Our

territory thus received in all, as a consequence of the Mexican War, an

increment of 591,398 square miles.

Inseparable from the politics of the Mexican War is the Oregon question,

since Oregon's re-occupation and "fifty-four forty or fight" had been

democratic cries for securing to Polk west-northern votes in 1844. We

had, however, no valid claim so far north, except against Russia--by the

treaty of 1824. The Louisiana purchase, indeed, had vested us with

whatever--very dubious--rights France had upon the Pacific, and the

Florida treaty of 1819 gave us the far better title of Spain to the

coast north of 42 degrees. This treaty, with Gray's discovery of the

Columbia in 1792, Lewis and Clarke's official explorations of the

Columbia valley in 1804-05-06, England's retrocession, in 1818, of

Astoria, captured during the War of 1812, and extensive actual

settlements upon the river by American citizens from 1832 on, made our

claim perfect up to 49 degrees at least. This parallel the convention

with Great Britain in 1818 had already fixed as our northern line from

the Lake of Woods to the Rocky Mountains. Between this and 54 degrees 40

minutes, England's title, from exploration and settlement, was superior

to ours, which was based upon alleged old Spanish discovery. The same

convention of 1818, renewed in 1827, opened the Oregon country to

occupation by settlers from both nations. Increase of immigration

rendering a fixing of jurisdictions imperative, England pressed for the

line of the Columbia below its intersection of the forty-ninth parallel.

We had twice offered to settle upon 49 degrees, which limit the rapid

growth of our population in the region induced England in 1836 to

accept. Whether Polk's blustering demand for "all Oregon," which came

near bringing on war with England, and his much condemned recession

later, were mere opportunist acts, is still a question. Many consider

them pieces of a deep-laid policy by Polk to tole Mexico to war in hope

of England's aid, then, suddenly pacifying England, to devour Mexico at

his leisure.

History of the United States, Volume 3 · 第 3 / 8 章