After the Revolution

The treaty of peace which ended the War of the Revolution was concluded in

November, 1782, but the people of Kentucky did not get the news for nearly

four months later. All were rejoiced that the struggle was ended and

confidently expected that trouble with the Indians would cease, since

there seemed no further reason for inciting them to make war on the

Kentuckians. The people were doomed to disappointment. The treaty left

possessions so poorly defined that not only did the Indians make

occasional invasions into the territory to plunder, under the direction of

the military commanders of the north, but the people were threatened by a

still graver danger. The unsettled boundaries and titles of lands along

the Mississippi River caused a question of ownership to arise between

France, England and Spain. Spain at that time controlled the lower

Mississippi River, and men from that country secretly came to Kentucky

attempting to arouse the people to the act of establishing a separate

nation under the protection of Spain. The loyalty of the good men of

Kentucky to the rights of Virginia cannot be too highly praised. There

were some persons, though, who for glory and private gain did all in their

power to stir up the rebellion and to establish a separate government.

Kentucky was virtually left to her fate beyond the mountains during the

trying times following the close of the Revolution.

The needs of the territory and the constant menace from these Spanish

agents led the better class of men in Kentucky to consider the question of

asking Virginia to be allowed the privilege of separation, with the

expectation of the territory’s being formed into a State, equal with

others of the Union. This would give a better administration of affairs

and would put an end to the efforts of agents from other countries

desiring to establish a separate nation.

On May 23, 1785, a convention of delegates met at Danville and sent the

following resolution to the Virginia Assembly: “Resolved: That it is the

duty of the convention, as they regard the prosperity and happiness of

their constituents, to pray the General Assembly at the ensuing session

for an act to separate this district from the present government, on terms

honorable to both and injurious to neither, in order that it may enjoy all

the advantages and rights of a free, sovereign and independent republic.”

In 1786, Virginia passed the act providing for the separation of Kentucky,

but she made it conditional on the willingness of the Congress of the

United States to admit Kentucky as one of the States of the Union, and

upon the willingness of Kentucky to become a member of the Union as soon

as separated from Virginia, thus preventing Kentucky from becoming an

independent republic, or a part of any foreign nation. It was during these

days that enemies to both Kentucky and the nation were busiest in their

efforts secretly to plan for either an independent government or an

alliance with Spain. Kentucky became a State in 1792, being the fifteenth

in the Union.

The story of Kentucky · 第 11 / 19 题