I THINK THAT IS WHY

the very deepest philosophers grow sad when they touch the question of

friendship. The problem is itself the saddest of commentaries upon the

weakness of our higher faculties. Separate man from his wife and family

and view him in his relations to other persons similarly placed, and the

result is not only unsatisfactory, but distressing to a mind anxious to

hold to a good opinion of humanity. Put to the right test the quality of

human friendship is found to be highly strained--to be liable to curdle

in the first thundershower--to sour upon the sensitive stomach. We at

once behold mankind forced to flee to God's kind institution of the

family and the home to escape a desolation of the heart which follows

fruitless efforts to kindle a blaze out of the damp driftwood of life's

general associations.

Now, what is possible? Spot friendship is possible, and delightful.

"To-morrow do thy worst, for I have lived to-day." Man is a social

animal. He "gregates," he flocks. Of nothing am I fonder than the

sparkle of a friend's eye, and the gabble of half an hour, or three

hours. But I ought not to build on any future gabbles, for, to-morrow,

lo! my friend may have discovered my ignoble reality, whereas he has

heretofore been shaking hands with my noble ideality.

The Golden Censer Or, the duties of to-day, the hopes of the future · 第 406 / 522 题