LUMINOSITY OF STARS INVOLVED IN NEBULAE

The number of nebulae of known distance is too small to serve as a

basis for estimates of the range in absolute magnitude among nebulae in

general. Further information, however, can be derived from a comparison

of total apparent magnitudes with apparent magnitudes of the brightest

stars involved, on the reasonable assumption, supported by such

evidence as is available, that the brightest stars in isolated systems

are of about the same intrinsic luminosity.

The most convenient procedure is to test the constancy of the

differences in apparent magnitude between the brightest stars involved

and the nebulae themselves, over as wide a range as possible in the

latter quantities.

An examination of the photographs in the Mount Wilson collection has

revealed no stars in the very faint objects or in the bright elliptical

nebulae and early-type spirals. This was to be expected from the

conclusions previously derived. Observations were therefore confined to

intermediate- and late-type spirals and the irregular nebulae to

the limiting visual magnitude 10.5. The Magellanic Clouds and N.G.C.

6822 were added to the nebulae in Holetschek’s list. Altogether,

data were available for 32 objects, or about 60 per cent of the total

number in the sky to the adopted limit. For this reason it is believed

that the results are thoroughly representative.

TABLE XVI

Difference in Magnitude between Nebulae and

Their Brightest Stars

==========+=============+============+===============

N.G.C. | m_{s} | m_{T} | m_{s} – m_{T}

----------+-------------+------------+---------------

Sb

----------+-------------+------------+---------------

224 | 15.5 | 5.0 | 10.5

1068 | 17.5 | 9.1 | 8.4

2841 | >19.5 | 9.4 | >10.1

3031 | 18.5 | 8.3 | 10.2

3310 | >19.0 | 10.4 | > 8.6

3623 | >20.0 | 9.9 | >10.1

3627 | 18.5 | 9.1 | 9.4

4438 | >19.0 | 10.3 | > 8.7

4450 | 19.5 | 10.0 | 9.5

4736 | 17.3 | 8.4 | 8.9

4826 | >19.5 | 9.2 | >10.3

5055 | >19.0 | 9.6 | > 9.4

5746 | >19.5 | 10.4 | > 9.1

7331 | 19.0 | 10.4 | 8.6

----------+-------------+------------+---------------

SBb

----------+-------------+------------+---------------

4699 | >19.5 | 10.0 | > 9.5

----------+-------------+------------+---------------

Sc

----------+-------------+------------+---------------

253 | 18.3 | 9.3 | 9.0

598 | 15.6 | 7.0 | 8.6

2403 | 17.3 | 8.7 | 8.6

2683 | >20.0 | 9.9 | >10.1

2903 | 19.0 | 9.1 | 9.9

4254 | 18.5 | 10.4 | 8.1

4321 | 18.8 | 10.5 | 8.3

4414 | >19.5 | 10.1 | > 9.4

4490 | 18.8 | 10.2 | 8.6

5194 | 17.3 | 7.4 | 9.9

5236 | 18.6 | 10.4 | 8.2

5457 | 17.0 | 9.9 | 7.1

----------+-------------+------------+---------------

Irr.

----------+-------------+------------+---------------

LMC | 9.5 | 0.5 | 9.0

SMC | 12.0 | 1.5 | 10.5

3034 | >19.5 | 9.0 | >10.5

4449 | 17.8 | 9.5 | 8.3

6822 | 15.8 | 8.5 | 7.3

----------+-------------+------------+---------------

The data are listed in Table XVI and are shown graphically in Figure

10. The luminosities of the brightest stars are given in photographic

magnitudes. For the Magellanic Clouds, M 33, and N.G.C. 6822, these

were obtained from published star counts. For M 31, 51, 63, 81, 94,

and N.G.C. 2403, they depend upon unpublished counts, for which the

magnitudes were determined by comparisons with Selected Areas. For the

remaining nebulae, the magnitudes of stars were estimated with varying

degrees of precision, but are probably less than 0.5 mag. in error.

[Illustration: Fig. 10.—Relation between total magnitudes of

extra-galactic nebulae and magnitudes of the brightest stars involved.

Differences between total visual magnitudes of nebulae and the

photographic magnitudes of the brightest stars are plotted against

the total magnitudes. The dots represent cases in which the stars

could actually be detected; the incomplete crosses represent cases in

which stars could not be detected, and hence give lower limits for the

magnitude differences. The diagonal line indicates the approximate

limits of observation, fixed by the circumstance that, in general,

stars fainter than 19.5 probably would not be detected on the nebulous

background.]

The sloping line to the right in Figure 10 represents the limits

of the observations, for, from a study of the plates themselves,

it appeared improbable that stars fainter than about 19.5 could be

detected with certainty on a nebulous background. Points representing

nebulae in which individual stars could not be found should lie in this

excluded region above the line, and their scatter is presumably

comparable with that of the points actually determined below the line.

When allowance is made for this inaccessible region, the data can be

interpreted as showing a moderate dispersion around the mean ordinate

$m_{s} - m_{T} = 9.0.$ (7)

The range in total magnitudes is sufficiently large in comparison with

the dispersion to lend considerable confidence to the conclusion. The

total range of four, and the average dispersion of less than 1 mag.,

are comparable with those in Table XV and in Figure 7, and agree with

the former in indicating a constant order of absolute magnitude.

The mean absolute magnitude of the brightest stars in the nebulae

listed in Table XV, combined with the mean difference between nebulae

and their brightest stars, furnishes a mean absolute magnitude of –15.3

for the nebulae listed in Table XVI. This differs by only 0.2 mag. from

the average of the nebulae in Table XV, and the mean of the two, –15.2,

can be used as the absolute magnitude of intermediate- and late-type

spirals and irregular nebulae whose apparent magnitudes are brighter

than 10.5. The dispersion is small and can safely be neglected in

statistical investigations.

This is as far as the positive evidence can be followed. For reasons

already given, however, it is presumed that the earlier nebulae,

the elliptical and the early-type spirals, are of the same order of

absolute magnitude as the later. The one elliptical nebula whose

distance is known, M 32, is consistent with this hypothesis.

Conclusions concerning the intrinsic luminosities of the apparently

fainter nebulae are in the nature of extrapolations of the results

found for the brighter objects. When the nebulae are reduced to a

standard type, they are found to be constructed on a single model,

with the total luminosities varying directly as the square of the

diameters. The most general interpretation of this relation is that the

mean surface brightness is constant, but the small range in absolute

magnitudes among the brighter nebulae indicates that, among these

objects at least, the relation merely expresses the operation of the

inverse-square law on comparable objects distributed at different

distances. The actual observed range covered by this restricted

interpretation is from apparent magnitude 0.5 to 10.5. The

homogeneity of the correlation diagrams and the complete absence of

evidence to the contrary justify the extrapolation of the restricted

interpretation to cover the 2 or 3 mag. beyond the limits of actual

observation.

These considerations lead to the hypothesis that the nebulae treated

in the present discussion are all of the same order of absolute

magnitude; in fact, they lend considerable color to the assumption

that extra-galactic nebulae in general are of the same order of

absolute magnitude and, within each class, of the same order of

actual dimensions. Some support to this assumption is found in the

observed absence of individual stars in the apparently fainter

late-type nebulae. If the luminosity of the brightest stars involved

is independent of the total luminosity of a nebula, as is certainly

the case among the brighter objects, then, when no stars brighter than

19.5 are found, the nebulae must in general be brighter than absolute

magnitude m_{T} – 25.8 where m_{T} is the total apparent magnitude. On

this assumption, the faintest of the Holetschek nebulae are brighter

than –12.5 and hence of the same general order as the brighter nebulae.

Once the assumption of a uniform order of luminosity is accepted as a

working hypothesis, the apparent magnitudes become, for statistical

purposes, a measure of the distances. For a mean absolute magnitude of

–15.2, the distance in parsecs is

$\log D = 0.2 m_{T} + 4.04.$ (8)

Extra-galactic nebulae · 第 23 / 40 题