II

Before telling the story of Hamaguchi Gohei, I must say a few words

about certain laws--or, more correctly speaking, customs having all

the force of laws--by which many village communities were ruled in

pre-Meiji times. These customs were based upon the social experience of

ages; and though they differed in minor details according to province

or district, their main signification was everywhere about the same.

Some were ethical, some industrial, some religious; and all matters

were regulated by them,--even individual behavior. They preserved

peace, and they compelled mutual help and mutual kindness. Sometimes

there might be serious fighting between different villages,--little

peasant wars about questions of water supply or boundaries; but

quarreling between men of the same community could not be tolerated in

an age of vendetta, and the whole village would resent any needless

disturbance of the internal peace. To some degree this state of things

still exists in the more old-fashioned provinces: the people know

how to live without quarreling, not to say fighting. Any-where, as a

general rule, Japanese fight only to kill; and when a sober man goes so

far as to strike a blow, he virtually rejects communal protection, and

takes his life into his own hands with every probability of losing it.

The private conduct of the other sex was regulated by some remarkable

obligations entirely outside of written codes. A peasant girl, before

marriage, enjoyed far more liberty than was permitted to city girls.

She might be known to have a lover; and unless her parents objected

very strongly, no blame would be given to her: it was regarded as an

holiest union,--honest, at least, as to intention. But having once made

a choice, the girl was held bound by that choice. If it were discovered

that she met another admirer secretly, the people would strip her

naked, allowing her only a _shuro-leaf_ for apron, and drive her in

mockery through every street and alley of the village. During this

public dis-grace of their daughter, the parents of the girl dared not

show their faces abroad; they were expected to share her shame, and

they had to remain in their house, with all the shutters fastened up.

Afterward the girl was sentenced to banishment for five years. But at

the end of that period she was considered to have expiated her fault,

and she could return home with the certainty of being spared further

reproaches.

The obligation of mutual help in time of calamity or danger was

the most imperative of all communal obligations. In case of fire,

especially, everybody was required to give immediate aid to the best

of his or her ability. Even children were not exempted from this duty.

In towns and cities, of course, things were differently ordered; but

in any little country village the universal duty was very plain and

simple, and its neglect would have been considered unpardonable.

A curious fact is that this obligation of mutual help extended to

religious matters: everybody was expected to invoke the help of the

gods for the sick or the unfortunate, whenever asked to do so. For

example, the village might be ordered to make a _sendo-mairi_[1] on

behalf of some one seriously ill. On such occasions the Kumi-chō (each

Kumi-chō was responsible for the conduct of five or more families) would

run from house to house crying, "Such and such a one is very sick:

kindly hasten all to make a sendo-mairi!" Thereupon, however occupied

at the moment, every soul in the settlement was expected to hurry to

the temple,--taking care not to trip or stumble on the way, as a single

misstep during the performance of a sendo-mairi was believed to mean

misfortune for the sick....

[Footnote 1: To perform a _sendo-mairi_ means to make one thousand

visits to a temple, and to repeat one thousand invocations to the

deity. But it is considered necessary only to go from the gate or

the torii of the temple-court to the place of prayer, and hack, one

thousand times, repeating the invocation each time; and the task may

be divided among any number of persons,--ten visits by one hundred

persons, for instance, being quite as efficacious as a thousand visits

by a single person.]

Gleanings in Buddha-Fields: Studies of Hand and Soul in the Far East · 第 7 / 100 题