CHAPTER III.

THE CATHEDRAL: INTERIOR.

Entering the cathedral from the west, we have the full view of the

entire building, the vista being not broken, but relieved, by the open

screen. Before examining the nave itself, the visitor should inspect the

lower part of the west tower, beneath which he is standing. The curious

labyrinth worked in the pavement was there placed by Sir G. G. Scott, and

is believed to have been designed by him, and not copied from any

foreign example. The troubles that arose from the great weight of the

tower have been already described. We can here see the methods taken to

secure the stability of the structure.[1] Very massive Perpendicular

arches have been built beneath the lofty Norman ones; and all the four

great piers were surrounded with masonry at the same time. Both Bentham

and Miller give the date 1405-1406 for the beginning of this work. This

date is quite consistent with the character of the mouldings of the

arches. There was at one time a plaster ceiling just above these lower

arches.

Above the inner west door is a series of panels bearing coats of arms,

so much resembling the fronts of galleries built for the accommodation

of instrumental performers--which were known as "Minstrels'

galleries"--as to suggest the idea that the large room over the porch

was devoted to this purpose. The window above is an unfortunate

insertion, dating only from 1800; and this, as well as the stained glass

with which it is filled, could well be spared.

#The Western Transept# and #S. Catharine's Chapel.#--The Transitional

character of the late Norman work here is more marked than on the

outside of the west front. It will be noticed that the great arches of

the tower, though retaining all other characteristics of the period, are

pointed. There are two rows of mouldings, and in the spandrels above are

pointed ovals. Above the string-course are three stages: the lowest has

three sets of lofty trefoiled lancets, supported by double detached

shafts; above is a similar series, less lofty; at the top are three

large glazed windows. The painted ceiling of the tower was Mr. le

Strange's first experiment in painting at Ely. Some ancient decoration

in the vault of the south aisle of the nave had been brought to light

when he was on a visit at the Deanery, and this to some extent suggested

the thought of painting the flat roof of the tower. The subject is the

Creation. We see the right hand of the Lord; the Saviour holding a

globe, surrounded by the heavenly bodies of the fourth day of the

Creation; the Holy Dove; angels holding scrolls, with the Trisagion; and

all these are in circular designs, united by branches of foliage. A very

sad accident occurred during the early period of the restoration of the

tower in 1845, when Mr. Basevi, the architect, met his death by falling

from the upper floor of the scaffold which had been erected for the

work. He was buried in the cathedral, and a brass has been laid over his

grave. He was not in any way professionally connected with the work of

the restoration.

[Illustration: THE NAVE, LOOKING EAST.]

The very late appearance of the highly enriched work in the south part

of the western transept makes it probable that this part was completed

in quite the latest years of the twelfth century. The zigzag mouldings

to the two arches in the east are of extraordinary richness; one opens

to the south aisle, and one to S. Catharine's chapel. The whole of this

arm of the transept was at one time walled off, and the chapel itself

was destroyed. This has been rebuilt, under the advice and authority of

Professor Willis. The Woodford Trustees of the Theological College were

at the expense of providing the alabaster altar; and the chapel is now

used for the daily service of the members of that college, as well as

for early celebrations of Holy Communion. Although now known as S.

Catharine's chapel, it has never, strictly speaking, been so dedicated;

and the present Dean has pointed out that the name was given under a

misapprehension. The font in the transept was the gift of Canon Selwyn.

Its style is in keeping with the adjacent architecture. The north

portion of the western transept is entirely walled off. No documentary

evidence has been discovered to decide if it had been actually built.

The old tradition of the cathedral was that it had been finished by

Bishop Eustace at the beginning of the thirteenth century.

#The Nave.#--Originally of thirteen bays, but since the fall of the

central tower of twelve bays, the nave is a most complete and perfect

specimen of late Norman work. The naves of Ely and Peterborough are

conspicuously the best examples of the period in England. In most

respects they are very similar, and it would be difficult to pronounce

one superior to the other. In one point, indeed, the superiority is with

the Ely nave. There is not in it the slightest mixture of any

Transitional details. At Peterborough we can detect, towards the west,

some unmistakable evidences of the approaching change in style.

It is believed that the nave was completed in the time of Bishop

Riddell--that is, before 1173. This is probably somewhat earlier than

the nave at Peterborough; but both were obviously being built at the

same time for the greater part of the period of their erection. Both are

manifestly superior to Norwich, where (to mention only one point) the

excessive height of the triforium arches and the comparative low

elevation of the nave arches--so that the two arcades are almost of the

same dimensions--produce an unpleasing effect. But the work at Norwich

was earlier, perhaps by thirty years, than either of the others. It is

very difficult to obtain exact and authoritative measurements; but those

usually given supply the following comparison:--Norwich, 14 bays; length

of nave, 250 feet: Peterborough, 11 bays; length of nave, 228 feet: Ely,

12 bays; length of nave, 208 feet. From this it will be seen that before

the tower fell the naves of Ely and Peterborough were almost exactly of

the same length, while the former had two more bays than the latter.

The piers are of alternate design. In front of each an inner shaft runs

up to the roof. The string-course above the main arcade has the billet

moulding. All the attached shafts in all three stages have cushion

capitals. Under each of the large triforium arches are two smaller ones.

Though it has been said that there is no trace of any change of style

throughout the entire nave, yet it has been noticed that there is a

certain roughness about the execution of the arches towards the east

which is not seen further west. The floors of the nave and its aisles

are on one level; but till recently the floors of the aisles were a few

inches lower, and this is believed to have been the original

arrangement. The clerestory range has three arches, the central being

the highest.

[Illustration: PANELS IN THE NAVE CEILING.

_Photochrom Co. Ltd. Photo._]

The western half of the #ceiling# was painted by Mr. Styleman le Strange,

of Hunstanton Hall, in Norfolk, between 1858 and 1861. He died in 1862.

The eastern half was then undertaken by Mr. Gambler Parry, of Highnam

Court, near Gloucester; and the main design of Mr. le Strange was

carried to a most successful issue. The original idea had been that a

Jesse tree should commence at the seventh bay, and the arrangement of

the subjects towards the west was meant to lead up to this. But Mr. le

Strange himself, as the work proceeded, realised that a grander effect

would be produced by introducing larger scriptural subjects towards the

east; and Mr. Gambier Parry accordingly acted upon what was known to be

the intention of the original designer. It has been many times said that

the whole design was suggested by the painted ceiling at Hildesheim, and

some words of Sir G. G. Scott have been quoted as proof of this; but Dean

Goodwin says that the scheme was not taken in any way from the foreign

example, and that Mr. le Strange had not seen the Hildesheim ceiling

when his design was formed.[2] It is worth noting that some of the

faces of the prophets are portraits; that of Isaiah, for instance, is a

portrait of Dean Peacock. The general tone of the colouring is

intentionally subdued, and the effect of this is said to be to increase

the apparent height of the nave.

The twelve subjects along the central portion of the ceiling, commencing

at the west, are these: (1) The Creation, (2) The Fall, (3) The

Sacrifice of Noah, (4) The Sacrifice of Isaac, (5) Jacob's Dream, (6)

The Marriage of Ruth, (7) Jesse, (8) David, (9) The Annunciation, (10)

The Nativity, (11) The Adoration of the Shepherds and of the Magi, (12)

The Lord in Glory.[3]

On the inner slope on each side of the central line for the ten western

bays are figures of patriarchs and prophets, each with a scroll bearing

some of his own words, all having prophetic reference to the Messiah. On

the outer slope on each side are heads in circular medallions, three in

each bay. "The heads forming the border represent the human ancestors of

our Lord, according to the genealogy in S. Luke's Gospel; they commence

at the eastern end and terminate at the western, thus linking together

the Glorified Manhood, as exhibited in the last of the pictorial

representations, with the Creation of Man in the first."[4]

The sloping sides of the ceiling follow the course of the great beams

supporting the roof. Till it was resolved to construct this ceiling the

beams were exposed, and the whole was open to the leads. Canon Stewart

speaks of it as a "remarkable example of a trussed rafter roof of seven

cants," and says that such a roof was sometimes called a compass roof.

He thinks it might have taken the place of an original roof of the

thirteenth century.

[Illustration: THE NORTH AISLE OF THE NAVE.

_Photochrom Co. Ltd. Photo._]

#The Nave Aisles.#--These retain their groined roofs. Some remains of

coloured decoration may be seen in various places, especially in the

south aisle; and the appearance of more elaborate colouring at one place

seems to indicate that there was a side altar beneath. The rood-screen

in the nave was by the pier in which is a small canopied niche. In the

north aisle, beneath the windows, is an arcade of round-headed lancets,

four in each bay. Above the arcade was originally a string of chevron

moulding running along the whole length of the aisle; but this has been

hacked off, except beneath the most eastern window. In the south aisle

there are five such lancets in each bay west of the prior's door, and

four in each bay beyond. The windows east of this door are higher in the

wall than the others, because of the cloister, and the wall arcade is

correspondingly more lofty. The chevron moulding remains in this aisle

for seven bays, after which (until the last bay but one) the marks of it

are clearly to be seen. One of the windows in the south aisle is

original; all the rest, except one, have been recently made like it. In

the north aisle all the windows are of the Perpendicular period, and

have three lights under ogee arches. All are filled with stained glass.

[Illustration: THE SOUTH AISLE OF THE NAVE.

_Photochrom Co. Ltd. Photo._]

In the south aisle is placed an ancient memorial stone of the greatest

interest. It consists of the square base and part of the shaft of a

cross. It was brought here from Haddenham, where it had been used as a

horse-block, by Mr. Bentham. On the base is this inscription:

LVCEM TVAM OVINO

DA DEVS ET REQVIE(M)

AMEN.

Ovin has been named in the account of the foundress as being her chief

agent, to whom was entrusted the civil government of her territory.

There is every reason to believe that this cross was erected either by

him or to his memory; and if so it must be twelve centuries old.

Just west of the monks' door is the entrance to the recently constructed

vestry for the choir-boys. This is thought to have been originally the

entrance to the cloister library or bookcase.

#The Octagon.#--Few visitors will perhaps be disposed to examine any

of the objects of interest in the cathedral before an inspection of the

beauties of this magnificent erection, the first sight of which, from

one of the smaller arches towards the aisles, is a thing never to be

forgotten. There is not one of the many able artists and architects who

have written about the octagon that has not spoken of it as being

without rival in the whole world; and the admiration that was expressed

fifty and more years ago would have been far greater, and the enthusiasm

more profound, had the writers seen it in its present state of perfect

restoration. No description can do adequate justice to the grandeur of

the conception or to the brilliancy of the execution of this renowned

work.

The four great arches rise to the full height of the roof; that to the

east, indeed, is higher than the vaulted roof of the choir and

presbytery, the intervening space being occupied with tracery of

wood-work on painted boards, the Saviour on the Cross being painted in

the middle. The wooden vaulting of the octagon springs from capitals on

the same level as those of the great arches. The four small arches to

the aisles are of course no higher than the roofs of the aisles: above

these, on each side, are three figures of apostles, under canopies with

crockets. The figures are seated, and each holds an emblem, by which it

can be seen for whom the figure is intended. It may be noticed (in the

central figure on the south-west side) that S. Paul, not S. Matthias,

is put in the place of Iscariot. The hood-moulds of the arches are

terminated by heads, of which six are portraits. King Edward III. and

Queen Philippa are at the north-east, Bishop Hotham and Prior Crauden at

the south-east, Walsingham and his master mason (so it is believed) at

the north-west; those to the south-west are mere grotesques. Above the

seated figures on each side is a window of four broad lights, filled

with stained glass. The eight chief vaulting shafts rise from the ground

as slight triple shafts; they support, a little above the spring of the

side arches, large corbels, which form bases for exquisitely designed

niches, and through these spring more shafts reaching to the vault. On

each of the corbels is a boldly carved scene from the career of S.

Etheldreda; they commence at the north-west arch. The subjects (two to

each arch) are as follows:

NORTH-WEST ARCH.--S. Etheldreda's second marriage. Her taking the veil

at Coldingham.

NORTH-EAST ARCH.--Her staff taking root. Her preservation in the flood

at S. Abb's Head.

SOUTH-EAST ARCH.--Her installation as Abbess of Ely, Her death and

burial (two scenes).

SOUTH-WEST ARCH.--One of her miracles. Her translation.

All these incidents have been sufficiently explained in the chapter on

the history of the building, with the exception of the seventh. The

authority for this is the "Liber Eliensis." A man named Brytstan,[5]

being ill, had vowed that if he were restored to health he would become

a monk. Upon his taking steps to carry out this intention he was charged

with seeking refuge in a monastery simply to escape the consequences of

robberies of which he had been guilty in his business. After trial at

Huntingdon he was condemned and put in chains in prison in London. After

continuous prayers for the intercession of S. Etheldreda and S.

Benedict, these two saints appeared to him, and the latter drew the

links of the chain apart and set the prisoner free. The miracle came to

the knowledge of Matilda, Henry I.'s queen, and investigations

followed, which resulted in the release of Brytstan, and he was

conducted to Ely with manifestations of joy. Some have thought that the

ribands still to be bought at the stalls at the annual fair, and known

as "S. Audrey's laces," are a reminiscence of this legend, and that they

represent the chains from which Brytstan was delivered. But the more

probable explanation is that they refer to the disease that afflicted S.

Etheldreda, a swelling in the neck, which she held to be a fit

punishment for the vanity of her youthful days, when she was fond of

wearing necklaces and jewels. "Saint Audrey's laces" became corrupted

into "Tawdry laces"; and so the adjective has been applied to all cheap

and showy pieces of female ornament.

Special attention may be given to some points in the sculpture of these

corbels, every one of which is worthy of careful study. In (1) notice

the figure of Ovin, previously named as the steward, bearing an official

staff, or perhaps a sword. In (2) the surrender of royal dignity is

signified by the crown placed on the altar. In (3) the leaf-bearing

staff has an abundance of conventional foliage. In (5) Wilfrid bears a

simple pastoral staff, and not an archbishop's cross, as in previous

scenes--a point to which Dean Stubbs calls attention as indicating the

historical accuracy of the designer, because in former scenes the

archbishop is represented in his own diocese, while here he is a simple

bishop in banishment. In (6) there is a dignified figure--probably S.

Sexburga--standing behind the priest who is ministering to the dying

abbess. In (7) the kneeling figure is S. Benedict handling the fetters.

Until the plain colour-wash with which the vault had been covered was

removed in 1850 there was no knowledge of what had been the character of

the original decoration. Traces of colouring were then discovered, and

in some places geometrical designs, but there was no evidence of

anything very elaborate. The whole of the present decoration forms

accordingly an entirely new design; it is by Mr. Gambier Parry, who

himself painted the principal figures. The central boss of the lantern

is carved in oak, and is original; only its painting is new. All the

remaining figures are wholly new. Groups of seraphim, bands of heavenly

minstrels bearing all kinds of ancient musical instruments, monograms,

and sacred emblems, all combine to give a rich variety.

[Illustration: THE SOUTH TRANSEPT.

_Photochrom Co. Ltd. Photo._]

#The Transepts.#--The architectural student will find the transepts

of the greatest interest; as in them is to be seen the earliest work in

the cathedral. They are similar in general character to those at

Winchester, which were built by Abbot Simeon's brother. The transepts at

Winchester were ready for consecration in 1093, and this was seven years

before Simeon came to Ely. The triforium is probably only in part

Simeon's work; and the clerestory was almost certainly added by his

successor. Both transepts have aisles, but in the south transept the

western aisle is walled off. Along the western wall in the north

transept is a stone bench. The square capitals of the piers here have

indentations at the corners, and this is an early example of such

indentation. Some slight ornamentation may be noticed in the cushions of

the capitals, especially in the south transept, where there are traces

of ancient colouring. The three chapels to the east of the north

transept are divided by walls, and two have wooden screens. One of these

has been restored by Professor Stanton for use as a chapel for early

celebrations and for private devotion. Some early paintings on the

vaulted roof, representing the martyrdom of S. Edmund, are sufficient

to justify this being called S. Edmund's chapel. It is probable that

this was the Chantry on the Green (so called from the place of residence

of the four chaplains) founded by Bishop Northwold. The screen in front

of this chapel is exceedingly light and graceful; it dates from about

1350. At one time it is said to have been in the south transept, and

afterwards where it now stands; it was removed in 1865, but is now

replaced. In the south transept the whole of the eastern aisle is walled

off for the library. In the plan in Bentham's History, 1770, only the

single bay to the south is marked as the library. The walls of partition

between the chapels were taken down in 1814. The western aisle has

always been separated by a low wall of Norman date, possibly a little

later than the adjacent piers; this wall has an intersecting arcade of

round arches, with a string of chevrons above. This aisle is used as a

vestry. Within is the ancient Norman vaulting; and there are some good

original windows, which cannot be seen from without except from the

Deanery gardens. From the devices on the late Perpendicular door it is

clear that it belonged to some church erected by Bishop Alcock; it was

only brought here from Landbeach about fifty years ago.

[Illustration: THE NORTH TRANSEPT.

_Photochrom Co. Ltd. Photo._]

The triforium and clerestory ranges are almost identical with those in

the nave. In the south transept the western windows of the triforium

have been altered into three-light Perpendicular windows. The roofs of

both transepts have been raised, but it is not known at what time. At

the north end are two large windows of good Perpendicular character; at

the south is a single window of seven lights, of very singular design.

At the ends of the transepts are two original galleries, level with the

triforium, supported on round-headed arches. On the north are five

arches, not of equal height, the two most lofty of which reach nearly to

the triforium level. On the south are six much lower arches, and above

them is a blank arcade of intersecting arches. In the floor of the south

transept are laid some very remarkable ancient tiles.

[Illustration: THE CHOIR SCREEN.

_Photochrom Co. Ltd. Photo._]

#The Choir# and #Presbytery#--A beautiful screen of oak, with brass

gates, designed by Scott, divides the choir from the octagon. It is of

early geometric character; and if there had been an original screen of

this design it would have been intermediate in date between the

presbytery and the choir. The tracery is very graceful. A rich cresting

runs along the top, cut through by the gable over the gates, which bears

a terminal cross. On both sides the small niches have statuettes.

[Illustration: ELEVATION OF THE BAYS OF THE PRESBYTERY.

(_for exterior see p. 55._)]

The choir, of three bays, is the work of Bishop Hotham. The last six

bays are the work of Bishop Northwold, and form the presbytery. In the

present arrangement seven of these nine bays form the ritual choir, and

two form the retro-choir. The difference in date between the presbytery

and choir may be roughly taken as very nearly a hundred years. The

former had been begun in 1240; the latter was nearly finished in 1340.

In the juxtaposition of these two magnificent specimens of the Early

English and Decorated periods of architecture there is an opportunity of

comparison which on such a scale occurs nowhere else. It is to be

remembered that in neither case is the treatment of the upper part quite

in accordance with the usual practice of the period. When the presbytery

was being built there were still standing east of the central tower the

four original bays of the Norman choir. These, it may be assumed, were

very similar in character to those in the nave. There would, beyond

question, have been in each bay large triforium arches, each with a

couple of subordinate arches; and a single window in the clerestory with

a blank arch on each side. Bishop Northwold's work was purposely made to

correspond with these bays as far as Early English work could do so; and

when after the fall of the tower it became necessary to rebuild the

choir, Bishop Hotham in like manner made his Decorated work correspond

with the Early English presbytery. The choir is, as would be expected,

richer in detail as well as more elaborate in design; and it would be

difficult to find in England anything to surpass the tracery of the

clerestory windows and triforium arches, the beautiful cusped inner

arches of the clerestory range, the open parapets at the base of the two

stages, or the long corbels, covered with foliage, that support the

vaulting shafts. In the choir the clerestory windows have four lights

each; in the presbytery are triplets. The old colouring has been renewed

throughout. On the north side of the choir the three bays are precisely

alike; but on the south there is a variation in the tracery of the

western triforium arch. There are also shields of arms (of the See of

Ely and of Bishop Hotham) in the spandrels of the triforium and arch

below; and the shaft between this arch and the next is enlarged at the

top into a base for a statue (probably of S. Etheldreda); while level

with the string above is a very fine large canopy (called by the

work-men "the table"), which is like nothing else in the cathedral. The

clerestory windows also on the south have different tracery.

[Illustration: THE CHOIR, LOOKING WEST.

_Photochrom Co. Ltd. Photo._]

The difference between the two styles of architecture is well marked in

the groining of the roof, the Decorated portion being much more

elaborate. Some of the bosses are very remarkable: one has S. Etheldreda

with pastoral staff; one has the coronation of the Virgin Mary; one has

the foundress bearing the model of a church, in which (as Dean Stubbs

has pointed out) both arms of the western transept are represented, so

that it is a fair inference that at the time this roof was constructed

the whole of the western transept was standing.

[Illustration: THE TRIFORIUM OF THE CHOIR AND PRESBYTERY.

_Photochrom Co. Ltd. Photo._]

Between the choir and presbytery there rise the massive Norman piers

built as the entrance to the apse; and these are the only remains of the

Norman church east of the octagon. Since the careful examination of the

foundations here, made by Professor Willis in 1850, it is not thought

certain that the apse was actually built. The foundations of the apse

were very manifest, and the design did not include a passage round it;

but there was also clear evidence that the apsidal foundation was

altered into a straight wall of the same thickness, and the probability

is that before the apse was built "it was resolved to convert it into

a square-ended presbytery, such as we now see at Oxford Cathedral and

St. Cross."[6]

[Illustration: THE CHOIR STALLS: NORTH SIDE.

_Photochrom Co. Ltd. Photo._]

The two most western triforium arches in the presbytery are glazed, the

roof of the triforium itself being wholly removed. The object of this

alteration has been fully explained in the account of the exterior of

the cathedral. On the ground beneath were the shrines; and under one of

the arches was erected, not long afterwards, the monument of Bishop

Barnet, in whose time and at whose expense the alteration was made.

The arrangement of the lancets at the east end is even more effective

within than without. The east end of Ely, says Professor Freeman, "is

the grandest example of the grouping of lancets.... Ely is also

undoubtedly the head of all east ends and eastern limbs of that class in

which the main body of the church is of the same height throughout, and

in which the aisles are brought out to the full length of the

building."[7]

It will hardly be believed that the magnificent stalls which were

formerly ranged in the octagon, and at a later period in the presbytery,

were once painted all over with a mahogany colour. They are the finest

Decorated stalls in England, the beautiful ones at Winchester being of

late thirteenth-century date. The carved panels in the upper parts are

new, and are the gifts of individual donors. They were executed in

Belgium. It is not known how these spaces were originally filled; Mr. le

Strange thought possibly with heraldic devices. The designs on the south

are from the New Testament, those on the north from the Old Testament

The seats in the lower range are also modern, as are the various

statuettes at the Stall ends, which represent the builders of the most

important parts of the fabric. On the misereres of the ancient stalls

are some wonderful grotesque carvings. The brass eagle lectern has been

copied, as to its main features, from an ancient example at Isleham. The

organ is in the triforium, on the north, and part of the case projects

over the easternmost arch of the choir.

The reredos is the first example in modern cathedral work of the

elaborate style of decoration for the most holy part of the sanctuary,

which is now not uncommon. It was the gift of Mr. John Dunn Gardner, of

Chatteris, and was designed by Scott. It forms the central portion of a

screen of stone which extends for the whole width of the presbytery. The

lower part of the whole is of deeply cut diaper-work; the upper part has

an open arcade of six arches, each with a mullion and tracery in the

early Decorated style. The reredos itself is of alabaster, and consists

of five main arches under canopies, and with tracery, and is ornamented

with a rich abundance of mosaic work, panels, medallions, statuettes,

twisted columns, and various kinds of carving. Five scenes from the last

days of our Lord's life on earth are carved in relief under canopies

beneath the chief arches. A full description, giving all the details of

the sculpture, and the materials of the mosaic, and the different

persons and emblematic graces represented by the busts and figures,

would require more space than we can give. The altar cross, of silver

gilt, is in memory of Bishop Woodford.

[Illustration: THE REREDOS.

_Photochrom Co. Ltd. Photo._]

[Illustration: THE LADY-CHAPEL.

_Photochrom Co. Ltd. Photo._]

#The Lady-chapel.#--Notwithstanding the cruel mutilation of the

sculpture all round this chapel, it can be seen that for perfection of

exquisite work there is no building of the size in this country worthy

for one moment to be compared with this in its unmutilated state. Its

single defect strikes the beholder at once: the span of the roof is too

broad and the vaulting too depressed for the size of the chapel. The

windows, of which those on the north have been restored, have already

been described. The end windows, which are of great size, are of later

date; that to the east has a look of Transition work about it. The

building was finished in 1349, and the east window was inserted by

Bishop Barnet, _circa_ 1373. For a possible explanation of the insertion

of this window, only a quarter of a century after the completion of the

chapel, see _ante_, p. 52. It is not thought probable that the original

designers left anything incomplete. The great beauty of the interior

consists in the series of tabernacle work and canopies that runs round

all the four sides below and between the windows. The heads of the

canopies project. In the tracery beneath, at the head of the mullion,

was a statue. The delicate carving of the cusps and other tracery is

varied throughout. On the spandrels were incidents connected with the

history of the Virgin Mary (mainly legendary) and of Julian the

Apostate; and though in no single instance is a perfect uninjured

specimen left, yet enough remains, in all but a few cases, for the

original subjects to be identified.[8] All was once enriched with

colour, and many traces remain; and in various parts of the windows

there are fragments of stained glass. Most of the monumental tablets

which once disfigured the arcade below the windows have been happily

removed into the vestibule. The arches and canopies at the east end are

arranged differently from those on the sides. In the roof, which reminds

us of the contemporary roof in the choir, are some carved bosses, not

large, but singularly good. Among the subjects can be recognised a

Crucifixion, with half-figures beside the cross; Adam and Eve; the

Virgin Mary and Elizabeth, holding between them a book inscribed

"Magnificat"; the Annunciation, with "Ave Maria Gracia plena"; the

Ascension, indicated by the skirt and feet of the Saviour and five heads

of apostles; the coronation of the Virgin; and the Virgin in an aureole.

[Illustration: DOORWAY OF THE LADY-CHAPEL.

_Rev. T. Perkins Photo._]

The arrangements for worship present an appearance very unlike those of

sixty years ago. A writer in 1876, writing of his early recollections,

says: "When I first knew Ely the state of the lady-chapel--then, as now,

used as a parish church--was so miserable from decay, violence, and

neglect, that it was simply painful to enter it." ... Now,

"well-designed benches have replaced the mean deal square pews, the

whitewash and yellow-wash which thickly clogged the carving has been

removed, the windows have been repaired and made water-tight, and the

altar and its adjuncts made to assume an air of reverent dignity."

We do not remember to have anywhere seen an explanation of the fact that

this chapel is now used as the parish church of Holy Trinity parish;

whereas the old church, the destruction of which occasioned the

appropriation of the lady-chapel to parochial use, was dedicated to S.

Cross.

#Monuments And Stained Glass#--It is convenient to treat the

monuments as a separate subject, so as not to break the continuity of

the architectural description. We will commence at the west, proceeding

along the north aisle, and so round the cathedral, pointing out those

that have anything of special interest.

Against the blocked doorway which gave access to the church of S. Cross

is placed an altar-tomb to the late Bishop Woodford (see below, p. 129).

The figure of the bishop is vested in cope and mitre, and has a pastoral

staff. The Crucifixion is on the wall at the back. There are several

shields of arms relating to the bishop's career or to the cathedral

history: among these are those of the Merchant Taylors' Company, at

whose school he was educated; Pembroke College, Cambridge, of which he

was a member; and of other colleges at Cambridge founded by bishops of

Ely. Three tablets in this north aisle, near the transept, record

donations towards the re-paving of the nave and aisles in 1676, 1869,

and 1873.

There is no monumental memorial in the nave. But the large slab of

marble in the centre, just in front of the position of the old

rood-loft, which has been already referred to as traditionally marking

the grave of Alan de Walsingham, should be noticed.

Under the four arches of the presbytery on the north, between the stalls

and the altar, are monuments of great importance. First we see that of

Bishop Redman (d. 1505), a very fine specimen of enriched Perpendicular

work. The mitred figure of the bishop is on an altar-tomb beneath a

richly groined roof, and a space is left at the feet, where a priest

might stand to pray for the soul of the deceased prelate.[9] There are

grand canopies on the sides, with crockets and coloured shields bearing

emblems of the Crucifixion, the arms of the See of Ely and of S. Asaph,

where Bishop Redman was at first; but the arms of the See of Exeter,

from which diocese he came to Ely, as now used, are not to be seen.

Above the roof is fine open screen-work, and against the adjoining

piers, east and west, are large canopied niches.

Next to this is the effigy of Bishop Kilkenny (d. 1256), a fine example

of Early English. The figure has cope, mitre, and staff. The bishop's

heart only was buried here.

[Illustration: THE NORTH CHOIR AISLE.]

In the next arch is a large Decorated structure of two stories, believed

by Scott to have been built by Walsingham as the base for the shrine of

S. Etheldreda. It was formerly known as Bishop Hotham's shrine, and his

effigy was placed beneath it. The lower story is open.

In the arch north of the altar is the tomb of the builder of the

presbytery, Bishop Northwold (d. 1254). He is represented in full

vestments. At the east of the tomb is a curious carving, apparently

meant for the martyrdom of S. Edmund. A king naked above the middle,

except for his kingly crown, is tied to a tree and pierced by arrows;

archers with drawn bows are behind; at one end the king has his head,

still crowned, in his hands, with a figure bearing a sword over him; at

the other side is either the wolf of the legend or an evil spirit in

animal shape.

In the aisle itself are several memorials, mostly of the eighteenth

century, that call for no special mention. The latest is the brass to

Mr. Basevi, 1845.

At the east end of the aisle is the #Chapel Of Bishop Alcock# (d.

1500). The date, 1488, is fixed precisely by the inscribed stone now

placed in the wall above a small stone altar. The stone in the wall has

five crosses, as though intended for a chantry altar, but the slab of

the altar beneath has no crosses. The inscription is, "Iohanes Alkoc

epus Eliesis hanc fabricam fieri fecit M cccc iiij(xx) viij." The sides

of the chapel are covered with niches, canopies, crockets, panels, and

devices. The roof has fan tracery with a massive pendant. A singular

little chantry is at the north, access to which is through a door at the

foot of the bishop's tomb. In a small window here is a little

contemporary stained glass. The bishop's rebus--a cock on a

globe--repeatedly occurs in the stone-work. The ornamentation strikes

the spectator as being excessive and too profuse. No figures have been

replaced in the niches.

In the retro-choir a mosaic slab over the remains of Bishop Allen (d.

1845) has a curious history. A son of the bishop was passing through

Paris soon after Napoleon's tomb was finished, and the surplus materials

were offered for sale by auction. Some of these were purchased by Mr.

Allen and utilised for the slab over the bishop's grave. The large

monument to Canon Mill (d. 1853) has an effigy in copper on a support of

marble and alabaster; students of India and Cambridge are by the feet.

The tomb of Cardinal Luxemburg (d. 1443) is beneath the most eastern

arch on the south, just north of Bishop West's chapel. When the monument

was concealed behind some wood-work great dispute arose as to the

headdress of the effigy. Bentham has an engraving with a cardinal's hat

on the archbishop's head. Cole records that it was a mitre. When the

wood-work was removed it was found that the figure was headless, as it

still remains.

[Illustration: THE EARLY ENGLISH PRESBYTERY AND THE SUPPOSED SHRINE OF

S. ETHELDREDA.]

Corresponding to the chapel of Bishop Alcock on the north is that of

#Bishop West# (d. 1533) in the south aisle. This is a most valuable

example of the Renaissance style. The niches and canopies with which the

walls are covered are much smaller than those in the other chapel, and

consequently more numerous; but by reason of the great delicacy of the

tracery and the wonderful variety of the designs there is no impression

that the decoration is overdone. No perfect specimen is left of the

statues or of the heads which were introduced in the tabernacle work;

and in its complete state this exquisite work can have existed for not

more, than twelve or thirteen years, as the Order in Council for

removing images was made in 1548. The roof is curious, as being an

adaptation in the Renaissance of the late Gothic fan tracery Some

colouring remains. The wrought-iron gates, with motto in Latin several

times repeated, and the curious little pendants from the roof,

consisting of angels bearing shields of arms, should be noticed. Bishops

Greene (d. 1738), Keene (d. 1781), Sparke (d. 1836), and Woodford (d.

1885) are all buried in this chapel. On the south side, within a

shrine-like receptacle, have been placed the relics of seven early

benefactors of the church. Originally buried in the Saxon church, they

have been several limes removed. They were placed here in 1771. The

names are carved in seven shallow niches. One was an archbishop, five

were bishops, and the seventh was Alderman Brithnoth. The dates range

from 991 to 1067.

The very interesting early Norman monumental slab, with carving in

relief, preserved in the aisle, does not strictly belong to the

cathedral, having been found at S. Mary's Church. Above a round-headed

canopy are some Norman buildings; in the chamfer of the canopy is an

invocation of the Archangel Michael, a figure of whom below has wings

and nimbus, and in the robe a portion of a naked figure with pastoral

staff beside it.

[Illustration: BISHOP ALCOCK'S CHAPEL.]

Proceeding westward, the monuments under the windows are those of Canon

Selwyn (d. 1875), Bishop Gunning (d. 1684), wearing a mitre, with long

hair and short beard, and Bishop Heton (d. 1609), in a cope and having

an ample beard. Under the arches of the presbytery, after the huge

tablet to Bishop Moore (d. 1714), are four monuments. The first is all

that is left of the tomb of Bishop Hotham (d. 1337). The next has

figures of John Tiptoft, Earl of Worcester, K.G., and his two wives. The

earl was beheaded in 1470, and is not interred here. One of the wives

was Cecily Neville, sister of Richard, Earl of Warwick, the King-maker.

Of the tomb of Bishop Barnet (d. 1373) the base only remains. It

resembles in general character the monument of Bishop Northwold.

[Illustration: BISHOP WEST'S CHAPEL.]

Under the last arch of the presbytery is the fine monument of Bishop

Louth (d. 1298). It is a very beautiful early Decorated composition.

Two brasses remain in the floor of the south aisle, both of great

interest. The famous brass of Bishop Goodrich (d. 1554) represents him

in full vestments (wearing a chasuble, not a cope), with mitre and

pastoral staff (see below, p. 124). This is specially noteworthy as he

was an enthusiastic supporter of the Reformation changes and is believed

to have encouraged, if he did not order the wholesale destruction of

statues and other ornamentation of the cathedral. He was Lord Chancellor

for three years, and the Great Seal is figured on the brass. Dean

Tyndall (d. 1614) is represented in a very different style. He is

figured in academical dress, wearing a ruff and a skull-cap, and with a

long beard. On one of the shields of arms may be seen the arms of the

Deanery impaling Tyndall.

Very many other tablets and inscriptions remain; but we have no space

for a more extended treatment of the subject. In the south transept is a

tablet to Dean Merivale (d. 1894), with a likeness in slight relief; and

mention of this gives opportunity for saying that the very greatest care

seems to have been taken to secure good likenesses in the most recent

monuments, those of three, as to which the writer can speak from

personal knowledge--Bishop Woodford, Dean Merivale, and Canon

Selwyn--being of conspicuous merit.

It would require a book to itself to treat exhaustively of the stained

glass in the windows. In nearly all cases, certainly in those which can

be examined without the aid of a glass, the names of the donors, or of

the persons to whose memory the windows were inserted, are plainly set

forth either in the windows or on brass tablets adjoining. It should be

stated that the greatest encouragement to this form of decoration was

given by Canon E. B. Sparke, who secured, partly by his influence and

persuasion, and largely by his own munificence, the insertion of so many

windows. It is true that in the first instance not a few were prepared

in too great a hurry, and some of those first placed in the restored

cathedral (as those in the octagon) have been at a later time condemned

as being deficient in harmony of colouring and in artistic design; but

there is little fault to be found with the most recent additions. Among

so many it is inevitable that very different degrees of merit will be

exhibited. It has been said that the entire series is an exemplification

of the Horatian maxim, "Sunt bona, sunt quædam mediocria, sunt mala

plura"; and, except that we should be disposed to exchange the position

of the words "quædam" and "plura" (if the metre allowed it), with this

sentiment we agree.

FOOTNOTES:

[1] Quite recently further security has been attained by a system

of iron bracing, not visible from beneath.

[2] "Ely Gossip," p. 39.

[3] When Murray's "Eastern Cathedrals" was published, Mr. Gambier

Parry's work had not been begun; and by comparing the above list

with the list there given as the proposed series of sacred

subjects for the last six bays of the ceiling, it will be seen

that the last three subjects are not the same as at first

intended.

[4] From the key to the ceiling by Dean Stubbs, in "Handbook,"

20th ed., pp. 60, 61.

[5] Admirable and exhaustive descriptions of these pieces of

sculpture, with sketches of six of them, are given in Dean

Stubbs' "Historical Memorials of Ely Cathedral," pp. 71-84. The

account in the text of the miracle on the seventh corbel is

condensed from this description.

[6] Canon Stewart, in _The Builder_, April 2nd, 1892.

[7] Introduction to Farren's "Cathedral Cities of Ely and

Norwich."

[8] For a full account and list of all the subjects as far as is

known, see Dean Stubbs' catalogue of them, abridged from Dr.

Montagu James' work on the iconography of the lady-chapel, given

in the "Handbook," 20th ed., pp. 127-132.

[9] In the inventory of plate, etc., "belonging to the late

priory at Ely," made 31 Hen. VIII., printed in Bentham's

"History" from the MS. in Corpus Christi College, Cambridge, the

only altars mentioned are the high altar, those in the

lady-chapel, in the chapels of Bishops Alcock and West, and in

"Byslope Redmannes Chaple."

[Illustration: THE CHOIR LOOKING EAST.]

[Illustration: THE CHAPTER SEAL. _From Bentham._]

Bell's Cathedrals: The Cathedral Church of Ely A History and Description of the Building with a Short Account of the Monastery and of the See · 第 3 / 6 章