The economic and commercial history of the city, while not so eventful

or of so absorbing interest as its military and civil annals, cannot

be entirely overlooked. One crop which is not now cultivated in the

State, but which once enriched the people of the planter city, was

first cultivated by a woman, Eliza Lucas, the accomplished daughter of

Colonel Lucas, Governor of Antigua, one of the Leeward Islands, and

afterward the mother of General Charles Cotesworth Pinckney and General

Thomas Pinckney, of South Carolina. With seed sent her by her father,

Miss Lucas, in 1741-42, planted the first indigo in South Carolina. In

1748, Parliament passed an act allowing a bounty of sixpence per pound,

and just before the Revolution the export from Charleston had risen to

1,107,660 pounds.

The cultivation of rice was one of the earliest planting experiments

in the State, and though Ramsay, the historian, attributes its

introduction to Governor Thomas Smith and a small bag of seed procured

from Madagascar in 1694, it is certain that rice had been successfully

grown in South Carolina as early as 1691. In 1770, the surplus over

consumption exported from Charleston had risen to 120,000 barrels,

valued at $1,530,000.

As early as 1770, “patches” of cotton were grown in South Carolina, and

year by year thereafter for two decades indigo cultivation declined,

and was finally entirely abandoned.

“In 1784,” says the Hon. W. A. Courtenay, the city’s most

accomplished and enthusiastic historian, “John Teasdale, a merchant

of Charleston, shipped from this city to J. and J. Teasdale,

Liverpool, eight bags of cotton. When the vessel arrived out the

laughable incident occurred of the cotton being seized on the ground

that it could not be grown in America. Upon satisfactory proof, which

had to be furnished, it was released. This cotton shipment was the

first ever made from the United States to a European port!”

Though slavery is commonly supposed to have rendered those living under

its debasing influence inert and slow to enter upon great commercial

enterprises, it is remarkable that Charleston merchants and planters

planned and successfully constructed the earliest great railroad line

in America. Mr. Courtenay says:

“While the Liverpool and Manchester Railroad was being constructed in

1829, under Stephenson’s direction, and Baltimore was reaching out

to the Ohio River, Charleston was projecting a railroad to the head

of navigation on the Savannah River, which when completed was the

longest railroad in the World.”[7]

In the royal grants of land in Carolina the Crown reserved an interest

in all precious and base metals, and some of the grants reserved for

the King a share of the diamonds and precious stones which avarice

rather than common sense suggested might underlie tide-water South

Carolina. Geologists and lawyers laughed at the idea of precious stones

in marshes and sand dunes, though there had been “black diamonds”

there for thousands of years. It was not until after the war between

the States that Dr. St. Julien Ravenel’s discovery of the commercial

value of the immense phosphate deposits brought wealth and prosperity

to many whose needs were the greatest. The fertilizer business then

established is still in successful operation and Charleston continues

to be the largest phosphate shipping port in the world.

[Illustration: PHILADELPHIA STREET (COON ALLEY).

SCENE IN REAR OF ST. PHILIP’S CHURCH.]

Of the war between the States it is not necessary to write at length.

Whether one regards “the firing of the first gun on Fort Sumter as the

first rash act of a wild and fatal delusion,” or as the beginning of

the greatest war in modern times for constitutional liberty and against

the lust for power and territorial domination, no fair man can deny the

heroism against unnumbered odds displayed by the Confederate soldiers.

It would be interesting to quote the opinion of Lord Wolseley as to

the value of the study of the siege of Charleston in its tactical

features as compared with the siege of Sebastopol and other great

naval attacks. All the world wondered at the marvellous success of the

blockade-runners, and the pages of history may be searched in vain for

greater heroism than that displayed by Glassell, Dixon and others who

first proved to the world the value of the torpedo in naval warfare;

but let two sets of figures suffice:

GENERAL SUMMARY FORT SUMTER, FEBRUARY 1, 1865.

Total number of projectiles fired against it 46,053

Total weight in tons of metal thrown (estimate) 3,500

Total number of days under three great bombardments 117

Total number of days under eight minor bombardments 40

Total number of days under fire, steady and desultory 280

Total number of casualties (52 killed, 267 wounded) 319

[Illustration: THE ATTACK ON CHARLESTON BY THE FEDERAL IRONCLAD FLEET,

APRIL 7, 1863.]

Charleston with a white population of 24,000 furnished twenty-three

companies of infantry, eleven of artillery and eight of cavalry to the

Confederate armies.

The comments of a British officer and of two officers who served in

the Federal army as to the extraordinary defence of Charleston are

submitted;--for one born and reared in sight of Fort Sumter, and as a

child carried away from the city to escape the shells from the “Swamp

Angel” on Morris Island, cannot write of his people _sine ira et

studio_.

Col. H. Wemyss Feilden, colonel and chief paymaster (retired list), H.

B. M. Army says:

“We find a large commercial city, at the commencement of a great

war defended by nearly obsolete works and with several unguarded

approaches, rendered impregnable in a short time by the skill and

genius of the general in command, supported by the indomitable valor,

devotion and tenacity of its defenders, and by the unflinching

spirit of all ages and both sexes in the community.”

Quartermaster-General M. C. Meigs, U. S. A., in an adverse report to

Secretary of War Stanton, in August, 1865, upon the petition of various

merchants and wharf owners of Charleston, asking that their warehouses

and wharves in the possession of the government be restored to them,

says:

“Charleston was a hostile fortress. In its defence the merchants

and property owners appear to have aided by all means within their

power. Its defence ceased only when, after a siege almost unexampled

since the invention of artillery, for duration and persistency, the

approach of a powerful army from the Mississippi Valley rendered any

further resistance entirely hopeless. Then the armed Rebel forces

abandoned the town, destroying such stores as they could. There was

no capitulation, no surrender by which any of the extreme rights of

captors were modified or abated in the giving up of an equivalent.

The place was defended to the last extremity, and the whole town is a

conquest, and as such the property of the conquering Government....

The warehouses and wharves used in the contraband trade, in violation

of the laws and proclamations of the United States, have been

used in aid of the Rebellion.... To put an end to this use, to

obtain possession of them, has cost the United States the lives of

many thousand of patriotic citizens sacrificed in the skirmishes,

assaults, battles and bombardments which have made the bloody record

of this unexampled siege. Shells and torpedoes, by land and by water,

have destroyed our citizens.... To restore this property, which

cost the loyal people so much blood, and so much treasure, to the

original disloyal owners would, it seems to me, give a shock to every

earnest and loyal man. Far better give the property to the families

and heirs of the victims of the massacre of Wagner, or of those who

perished upon the monitors sunk by the agents of the Torpedo Bureau

in Charleston Harbor.”

It only remains to say that President Andrew Johnson did not share the

views of Quartermaster-General Meigs and that the property was restored

to the claimants.

Ex-Governor D. H. Chamberlain, formerly an officer in the Union army,

speaking to a representative young Virginian--a great-grandson of Chief

Justice Marshall--in Charleston a few days ago, said:

“When I walk the streets of this city of 65,000 inhabitants, and more

than half of them colored, and when I see the poverty of its material

resources as compared with the large and flourishing business centres

of the North, and when I remember that the population of this city

in 1861 was not over 41,000, of which not over 24,000 were white,

I marvel at the blind confidence and fatuity of this people in

inaugurating the most tremendous war of modern times; but when I walk

along the sea wall of the ‘Battery’ and see in the distance Fort

Sumter and Fort Moultrie and other fortifications which, though often

attacked, were never carried by storm, I begin to understand the

wonderful spirit of this people. Charlestonians held this stronghold

for four years against the most powerful fleet of war vessels ever

seen up to that time on this hemisphere.”

[Illustration: MAJOR-GENERAL WILLIAM MOULTRIE.

FROM A PAINTING BY COL. J. TRUMBULL.]

Disastrous fires have destroyed many of the historic landmarks of the

town, and the most interesting public building still standing is the

Colonial Exchange, built in 1771, at a cost of £41,470. In its basement

Colonel Isaac Hayne and other patriot prisoners were confined, and here

General Moultrie walled up one hundred thousand pounds of gunpowder,

which remained undiscovered during the three years that the British

held the town. It was the scene of a ball and public reception in honor

of General Washington when he visited Charleston after the Revolution,

and was used as the Post Office from 1783 until the construction of the

new granite Post Office, in Italian Renaissance style, during the last

decade.

Of the first St. Philip’s Church, built on the present site, Edmund

Burke said that it “is spacious, and executed in a very handsome

taste, exceeding everything of that kind which we have in America,”

and another author (the biographer of Whitefield) called it “a grand

church resembling one of the new Churches in London.” That building was

constructed in 1723 and was the leading church in the State until its

destruction in the great fire of 1835. The architectural proportions

and beauty of the present St. Philip’s Church,--with its lofty steeple

reaching to a height of nearly two hundred feet, from which shines at

night a beacon light to mariners far away at sea,--“though perhaps

peculiar to themselves, command the instant admiration of every

beholder, professional or otherwise.”

No visitor to Charleston fails to visit St. Michael’s Church, the

finest piece of colonial ecclesiastical architecture in the South, and

which was first opened for divine service in 1761. The story of its

chime of bells attracts the stranger and makes the bells doubly dear

to all born within the shadow of the lofty tower. They never jangled

out of tune, except on the eventful night of August 31, 1886, when the

steeple was swayed by the earthquake. In 1782, Major Traille, of the

Royal Artillery, took possession of the bells as spoils of war and sent

them back to England, but the next year they were repurchased by a Mr.

Rhyner and sent back to Charleston, where they continued to voice the

people’s joy or woe until the war between the States, when they were

sent to Columbia for safe keeping. When General Sherman burned that

city in 1865, two of the bells were stolen and the rest were so injured

as to be useless. Once again the bells were shipped to England, where

they were recast by the successors of the firm which had made them in

1764, from the same patterns, and again returned to Charleston and

replaced in the belfry on March 21, 1867.

The church has been commemorated in the popular lyric of Mrs.

Stansberry, _How he Saved St. Michael’s_, though as a matter of fact

it was the spire of St. Philip’s that was saved from fire by an heroic

negro. Timrod, during the war between the States, refers to the church

in one of his tenderest poems entitled, _Christmas_, and Simms,

when the steeple was made a target for Federal guns, published his

passionate lines beginning:

“Aye, strike with sacrificial aim,

The temple of the living God,

Hurl iron bolt and seething flame

Through aisles which holiest feet have trod!”

[Illustration: ST. MICHAEL’S CHURCH, CHARLESTON.]

From the “pigeon holes,” the highest point in the tower, patriots of

the Revolution watched the coming and progress of the British fleets

of Parker and Arbuthnot, and almost a century later the war-ships of

Dupont and Dahlgren were sighted from the same aerie long before they

crossed the bar.

Its congregation is so largely composed of the élite of Charleston

society that a local wit had irreverently called the venerable

structure “the Chapel of Ease of the St. Cecilia Society.”

It is claimed that the French Protestant (Huguenot) Church in

Charleston is nearly if not quite coeval in date with the present city.

There is some evidence that the church owes its origin to the colony

of French Protestants sent out to the Province in 1680 by Charles II.

of England. The Revocation of the Edict of Nantes and the consequent

Huguenot emigration to America in 1685 put the church on a solid

foundation, though many of the Huguenots who came to Carolina settled

at Orange Quarter, on the Santee River, at St. John’s, Berkeley, and

possibly in St. James, Goose Creek. In 1687, came Elias Prioleau,

the first recognized and regular pastor of the French Church in

Charleston. Two of his lineal descendants are now in the eldership

of the church. After the fire of 1740, in which the early records of

the church were destroyed, the liturgy of Neufchâtel and Valangin was

adopted and an English translation of it is still in use.

In 1845 the present tasteful Gothic edifice, the fourth upon the same

site, was built, and has been in use ever since, except during the war

between the States.

In 1858, before a baptism of blood and fire had put the courage and

tenacity of Charleston to the supreme test, and twenty-eight years

before the memorable earthquake, James L. Petigru, the head of the

bar of Charleston, and President of the Historical Society of South

Carolina, said in a public speech: “Perhaps the opinion is tinged with

partiality; yet, after making due allowance for such bias, I think I

may say that in the circle of vision from the belfry of St. Michael’s

there has been as much high thought spoken, as much heroic action

taken, as much patient endurance borne as in any equal area of land on

this Continent.”

With such a past, Charleston looks hopefully into the future,

confidently expecting as signal triumphs in the arts of peace as her

sons once achieved against the fleets of France, Spain and England.

[Illustration: SEAL OF CHARLESTON.]

FOOTNOTES:

[7] The crude rules for passenger transportation in “the thirties” read

strangely to the traveller who almost annihilates time and space in the

modern “vestibule train,” at the rate of sixty miles or more an hour.

An early resolution of the South Carolina Railroad Board of Directors

declares that there shall be “in future not over twenty-five passengers

to any car; speed shall not exceed one car and passengers at fifteen

miles per hour; two cars and passengers at twelve miles per hour; three

cars and passengers at ten miles per hour.”

[Illustration]

SAVANNAH

NEVER LAST AND OFTEN FIRST

BY PLEASANT ALEXANDER STOVALL

The city of Savannah is now a centre of railroad and steamship lines.

It has the heaviest commerce of all the Atlantic ports south of

Baltimore. It is the largest naval stores market in the world, and its

cotton and lumber receipts are very considerable. But in spite of its

commercial primacy Savannah preserves a distinct flavor of the olden

time. On the shores of the Savannah River, where the British ships

were burned in the Revolution, a railroad system is cutting slips and

building piers, spending a million dollars in terminal facilities.

The high bluff where the early colonists planted their crane in 1732

to move goods from the ships to the river bank is now walled-in

stone, and the strand is gridironed with steel rails. The powder

magazine near “the Old Fort,” afterwards seized by the patriots of the

Revolution, is the site of flourishing foundries. The filature where

early colonists were taught to spin silk has been dismantled, and long

rows of brick tenements front upon the sandy streets. The tall pines

under which Oglethorpe pitched his tents survived the shock of war,

and succumbed only to the sweeping storms in 1800. To-day this site

is paved with brick and Belgian block, and is the centre of the Bay,

where cotton and wholesale men do congregate. “The publick oven” on

Congress Street stood opposite Tondee’s tavern, where the first liberty

pole was elevated by the patriots, and where a tablet has been placed

in the wall of a thriving grocery store to mark the birth of newer

freedom. “Fort Halifax,” the breastworks of the “Liberty Boys,” is now

covered by the wharves and warehouses of the Ocean Steamship Company,

the busiest spot in all Georgia. Spring Hill redoubt, where Pulaski

died, is lined by the brick walls of the Georgia Central Railway. The

executive mansion of Sir James Wright, the last royal Governor, stood

where the United States has just finished its marble post office,

perhaps the handsomest public building in the country, with the

exception of the Congressional Library.

[Illustration: THE POST OFFICE.]

In spite of all these changes, Savannah has followed the original

lines laid down by Oglethorpe. The lots are still sixty by ninety

feet, flanked front and rear by open streets. The public squares which

marked the city at convenient distances, used by the early settlers

as camp-grounds and corrals in cases of military alarm, are to-day

verdant and fresh with beds of flowers and spraying fountains, and

dotted by historic monuments. “The tint of antiquity” still rests upon

its walls. Now and then the white mulberry, where the silkworm fed

in the eighteenth century, crops out and shows its familiar leaves

along the streets, and the house of General Lachlan McIntosh, where

the Legislature met in 1782, on South Broad Street, still stands,

preserving many of its Colonial lines.

There was a time when Sunbury, the cradle of that splendid secession

of 1776, was a port of entry, and the Altamaha was looked upon as a

rival of the Savannah. Now the forts of Sunbury are overgrown, and the

place is seldom heard of save once a year, when one of “the Critter

companies” of the neighborhood repairs to the historic spot and holds

its annual target contest and barbecue. Frederica was a flourishing

settlement on South Newport River, but after the Spanish War of 1742

sank into decay. Ebenezer, on the Savannah, was the home of the thrifty

Salzburgers, who gave a distinct stamp to the Georgia colony, but

Ebenezer did not long survive the shock of the Revolution, when the

British scandalized these primitive people by quartering their horses

in the old brick church, which stands to-day. Only Savannah, of all

these early settlements, remains, and when one walks through its

beautiful streets and Colonial parks, even now he can easily recall

the conditions of that February morning in 1732, when “the odor of the

jessamine mingled with the balm of the pine,” and the palmetto and

magnolia threw their shade across the sandy bluff.

[Illustration: HOUSE WHERE THE COLONIAL LEGISLATURE ASSEMBLED IN 1782.]

Hon. P. W. Meldrim, Mayor of Savannah, in a tribute to his city in

a recent address, called attention to the fact that the very name

of Savannah’s streets, “State,” “Congress,” “President,” are full

of patriotic suggestions, telling the story of the Revolutionary

struggle. Other avenues bear the historic names of Montgomery, Perry,

and McDonough, while the wards have been labeled Washington, Warren,

Franklin and Greene.

“Every spot is hallowed. Where the Vernon River flows by Beaulieu,

the dashing D’Estaing landed to make his attack with the allied

forces of Savannah. Hard by is Bethesda, ‘House of Mercy,’ where

Jew, Protestant and Roman Catholic united in founding Georgia’s

noblest charity. There it was that Wesley sang his inspired songs and

Whitefield with his eloquence thrilled the world. On the river is

the grove where General Greene lived and died, and Whitney wrought

from his fertile brain the wonderful invention which revolutionized

commerce. Near at hand, almost sunk into oblivion, is the spring made

historic by the daring of Jasper and Newton. There stands Savannah’s

pride, her Academy of Arts and Science. Over there is the home where

Washington was entertained, and across the street are the guns which

he captured at Yorktown. Here, at our very feet, Casimir Pulaski

fell, charging at the head of his legion, while Jasper, rescuing the

colors, yielded up his gallant life.”

[Illustration: HEADQUARTERS OF WASHINGTON DURING A VISIT TO SAVANNAH.]

The real romance of history is the settlement of the colony of Georgia.

Two centuries ago the fertile lands extending from the Savannah to

the Altamaha had attracted the attention of pioneers and public men.

Sir Robert Montgomery had his eye upon this favored tract, as yet

unsettled, and described it as “an amiable land lying along the same

parallel with Palestine.” But it was reserved for the first soldier

and gentleman of his day to found the new colony and perfect a noble

benefaction. Had England exercised the same care over the other

colonies as over Georgia, it is possible that the War of the Revolution

might have been postponed indefinitely. It is worthy of note that

while Virginia and the New England colonies were settled by exiles

who drifted to the barren shores of Jamestown and Plymouth to escape

religious and civil persecution, the Georgia colonists sailed the seas

in the good ship _Ann_ under the fostering care of the mother country,

piloted by statesmen and noblemen, and sought the smiling Savannahs

with all the forms of royal patronage. These people, released from

debtors’ prisons and freed from pecuniary obligations, cleared by a

single act of royal clemency from bankruptcy, departed for Georgia

with ships supplied from the coffers of nobility, while the spiritual

welfare of the people was nurtured by the clergymen of the Established

Church. It was a lofty benefaction, and when these hitherto unfortunate

men felt their fetters fall, and knew that no bailiff awaited them in

Savannah, it was no wonder that, on the morning of the 2d of February,

1733, they gave thanks “for the safe conduct of the colony to its

appointed destination.”

Historic towns of the southern states · 第 12 / 25 段