Howbeit, there are walnuts and walnuts. The tree, having been cultivated

for its fruit from immemorial time, has developed a great number of

varieties, producing large or thin-shelled nuts, which cannot be

trusted for the production of fine timber. Where that is the purpose, it

is important to plant the wild type, for which the demand is not such as

to encourage nurserymen to stock it. John Evelyn, nearly two hundred and

fifty years ago, urged his fellow-countrymen to give more attention to

the walnut, but he urged in vain.

"How would such publick plantations improve the glory and wealth of

a nation! but where shall we find the spirits among our countrymen?

Yes, I will adventure to instance in those plantations of Sir

Richard Bidolph upon the downs near Letherhead in Surry; Sir Robert

Clayton at Morden near Godstone, and so about Cassaulton

[Casehorton], where many thousands of these trees do celebrate the

industry of the owners, and will certainly reward it with infinite

improvement, as I am assured they do in part already, and that very

considerably; besides the ornament which they afford to those

pleasant tracts."

It is curious to find Evelyn, who infused a fair proportion of

scientific scepticism into his practical treatise, lending credence to

some of the mythical virtues of the walnut. Thus he gravely writes that

"the distillation of the leaves with honey and urine makes hair spring

on bald heads."

In raising this tree from seed the walnuts offered for sale as food

should be avoided, for these generally have been kiln-dried, and their

vitality, as well as their flavour, thereby impaired or destroyed. Nuts

should be selected from large trees of the best habit, laid in sand

during the winter and sown in February. They are rather ticklish plants

to handle in the nursery, owing to the long bare tap-root which they

send down, and which should be shortened when the seedlings are

transplanted, as they should be at a year old. If fine timber be the

object, the young trees when planted out should be stimulated to upward

growth by the presence of other trees as nurses. A very slight spring

frost suffices to destroy the young growth; but the walnut generally

escapes that risk by being the latest of all our woodland trees, except

the ash, to put forth leaves. I do not remember to have seen the young

leaves appear so early as they did in the remarkable spring of 1914,

when they were put forth before the end of April; the ash continuing

bare that year till the very end of May.

Of the many fine walnut trees scattered over the midland and southern

English counties, I have seen none equal in size to one figured in Elwes

and Henry's great work (vol. ii., plate 74), a truly noble specimen

growing at Barrington Park, Oxfordshire. In 1903 it was between 80 and

85 feet high, with a girth of 17 feet. The bole and branches are covered

with burrs, indicating that the timber would make beautiful panelling

and veneers.

The only notable walnuts which I can remember to have seen in Scotland

are one at Gordon Castle, another at Cawdor, and a third at

Blairdrummond. The first of these would have been a magnificent tree had

it been subjected to forest discipline in youth, and so expended its

vigour in height rather than breadth. It is only 60 feet high, with a

girth of 10 feet, but it covers with its huge branches a space nearly 80

feet in diameter. The tree at Cawdor is about 65 feet high, with a girth

of 15 feet 7 inches; and that at Blairdrummond is the tallest of the

three, with a girth of 13 feet. Such dimensions cannot compare with

those which the walnut attains in Southern Europe. A writer in the

_Gardeners' Chronicle_ described one in the Baidar Valley, near

Balaclava, which yields from 80,000 to 100,000 nuts annually, and

belongs to five Tartar families, who divide the produce between them.

Still, there are so many fine examples of what this tree may become in

Great Britain that one may well ask why the production of its timber has

been so utterly neglected. Mahogany and other foreign woods have usurped

its place in the cabinet trade; but we still import large supplies of

walnut, not only for panelling, but for the stocks of army and sporting

small arms. For that purpose it has no equal, owing to its lightness,

strength, the nicety with which it can be cut to fit gunlocks, and

because it never warps nor swells when exposed to wet. "During the last

war," says Selby in 1842, "when most of the continental ports were shut

against us, walnut timber rose to an enormous price, as we may collect

from the fact of a single tree having been sold for £600; and as such

prices offered temptation that few proprietors were able to resist, a

great number of the finest walnuts growing in England were sacrificed at

that period to supply the trade.[14] Some years ago the War Office

authorities sought to extend their sources of supply by substituting one

of the superb kinds of timber grown in our colonies; but although

twenty different woods were submitted and tested, none was found

suitable except the American black walnut.

This (_Juglans nigra_) is a larger tree than the European species,

growing to a height of 150 feet with a girth of 15 to 20 feet in the

middle States of North America. It has now become very scarce, owing to

reckless destruction of the forests; but there are some specimens in

England already approaching the dimensions of those in Ohio, Indiana,

and Kentucky. For instance, there is one at the Mote, near Maidstone,

over 100 feet high, with a girth of 12 feet 6 inches in 1905, and

another in the public park at Twickenham, 98 feet high in the same year,

with a girth of 14 feet 3 inches. Besides some lofty black walnuts of

the ordinary type at Albury Park, Surrey, there is one very handsome

tree on the terrace, near the house, distinguished as a variety under

the title _J. nigra alburyensis_.

I do not know of any in Scotland, except a few hundreds which I raised

from seed about ten years ago, and which are now planted out in mixture

with the Japanese _Cercidiphyllum_. The only fault I find with them is

that, while the young growth is as tender as that of the common walnut,

it is earlier in starting, and therefore more liable to injury from

spring frosts.

The timber of the black walnut is quite equal in quality and superior in

beauty to that of the European species. The tree is sometimes confused

with the kindred genus hickory (_Carya_), whereof there are many fine

specimens in Great Britain; but the two genera may be readily

distinguished from each other by cutting across a twig. The pith of all

species of walnut is neatly chambered, that of the hickories is solid.

[Illustration: BLACK WALNUT (_Juglans nigra_ var. _alburyensis_)

AT ALBURY PARK, SURREY

Height 75 ft., girth 9 ft. 6 in.]

The Holly

"Heigh-ho! sing heigh-ho! unto the green holly:

Most friendship is feigning, most loving mere folly:

Then heigh-ho, the holly!

This life is most jolly."

It is rather curious that, dearly as Shakespeare loved the woodland and

ready as he ever was to enrich his verse with references to trees and

flowers, he never mentions the holly except in this song from _As You

Like It_. This is the more remarkable because holly is more widely

distributed over Britain than most other forest growths, and must have

been far more abundant in the sixteenth century before the land was

infested by rabbits to the extent it is now; for these accursed rodents

make a clean sweep of holly seedlings and also destroy large trees by

barking them.

It may be thought that the holly should be ranked as a shrub rather than

as a forest tree; but when well grown it is fairly entitled to the

superior rank, for there are many fine specimens in these islands

upwards of 50 feet high. Dr. Henry measured one in 1909 near Ampthill,

in Bedfordshire, 60 feet high and ll½ feet in girth. But this tree

has no single bole, for it divides into seven large stems at about 18

inches from the ground. A far more shapely specimen is one which Lord

Kesteven measured at Doddington Hall, Lincoln, and found in 1907 to be

about 50 feet high, with a girth of 9½ feet at breast height. Being

very patient of shade, the holly is sometimes drawn up to still greater

height than this; Mr. Elwes having found some at Russells, near Watford,

crowded among beech trees and rising to 70 and 75 feet.

The most remarkable holly grove known to me is in the park of Gordon

Castle, covering a steep bank overlooking what used to be the Bog o'

Gicht, but now a fertile holm. It is not known whether these hollies are

of natural growth or planted, but they are evidently of great age;

indeed, they are mentioned as remarkable in a description of Gordon

Castle written in 1760--154 years ago. There are about five hundred

trees in the grove, irregularly scattered along the bank, fifty-four of

them being crowded into the space of about a quarter of an acre. But

alas! one may look in vain for seedlings which might ensure the

perpetuation of this ancient grove; all that may spring up are greedily

devoured by rabbits.

Talking of seedlings, the propagation of hollies from seed requires to

be set about in light of the fact that the seed requires a year of

repose before germinating. The readiest way, therefore, is to lay the

berries in moist sand for twelve months, after which the seeds may be

sown in a nursery bed, where they will soon show signs of life.

The largest, though not the loftiest, holly I have ever seen is the

remarkable tree at Fullarton House, near Ayr. It stands upon a shaven

lawn, which is greatly to the detriment of its nourishment, and it has

lost much of its height through decay of the upper branches. But it has

a single hole of 8 feet, measuring at the narrowest part, 3 feet from

the ground, 11 feet 3 inches in girth. The spread of branches is 189

feet in circumference.

Having been cultivated for centuries as a hedge and shrubbery plant, the

holly has sported into a great variety of forms and colours, none of

them, to my taste, the match of the wild type for beauty, and some of

them mere ugly caricatures thereof. The best variegated forms are of

ancient descent--namely Golden Queen and Silver Queen, which are quite

as vigorous and bear fruit as freely as the type. These are both very

beautiful; as to the other varieties, the world would be no loser if

they were all extirpated, unless the quaint little hedgehog holly,

described by Parkinson in 1640, were retained as a curiosity. To this

doom, however, I certainly would not consign the yellow-berried holly,

which gives a fine contrast with the common scarlet-berried kind, and is

stated by Cole (writing in 1657) to have been found in a wild state near

Wardour Castle. John Evelyn wrote in 1664 of a variety with white

berries; Loudon also referred to this, and also to one with black

berries; but I have neither seen these varieties nor met with anyone who

had. It is doubtful whether both writers have not been misled by

hearsay.

Evelyn employed all the resources of typography to express his

enthusiasm for this fine evergreen:--

"Above all the natural _Greens_ which inrich our _home-born_ store,

there is non certainly to be compared to the _Holly_, insomuch as I

have often wonder'd at our _curiosity_ after foreign Plants and

expensive _difficulties_, to the neglect of the _culture_ of this

_vulgar_ but _incomparable tree...._ Is there under _Heaven_ a more

glorious and refreshing object of the kind than an impregnable

_Hedge_ of _near three hundred foot in length, nine foot high_, and

_five in diameter_; which I can show in my poor _Gardens_ at any

time of the year, glitt'ring with its arm'd and vernish'd _leaves_?

The taller _Standards_ at orderly distances, blushing with their

natural _Coral_. It mocks at the rudest assaults of the _Weather_,

_Beasts_, or _Hedge-breakers_."

This hedge grew, not at Wotton, but at Sayes Court, Evelyn's other place

near Deptford, which he leased to the Czar Peter the Great in 1697, and

had occasion to repent having done so, for that eccentric monarch, in

the intervals of his work at the dockyard, amused himself by causing his

courtiers to trundle each other in wheelbarrows down a steep descent

into the said hedge, which was seriously damaged thereby.

No tree is better adapted than the holly for making a hedge; but it does

not always get the treatment necessary to produce the finest effect. I

have never seen any to equal the holly hedges at Colinton House, in

Mid-Lothian, which were planted between 1670 and 1680, and are now from

35 to 40 feet high, tapering upwards from a basal diameter of about 20

feet. The lower branches have rooted themselves freely, so that it would

be difficult to create a more effective barrier of vegetation. The

total length of these hedges is 1,120 feet, having been formed

originally with about 4,500 plants. Colonel Trotter's gardener, Mr. John

Bruce, takes a just pride in tending them, clipping them annually at the

end of March, so as to ensure a close young growth maturing before the

winter frosts.

The proper season for planting hollies is May, after growth has started.

If the operation is delayed till autumn, they make no new roots, and

suffer so much from frost and cold winds that many of them never get

established. This is one of those secrets which one has to find out for

oneself, at the cost of many wasted seasons. _Haud ignarus loquor._

Although in generous soil the holly will make long annual shoots, it is

very slow in forming wood, which may account for our neglect of it as a

timber tree. But the wood is of very fine quality, being hard and white,

excellent for turnery and for making mathematical instruments.

"We presume," says Phillips in _Sylva Florifera_ (1823), "that many

noble trees of holly would be seen in this country, but for the practice

of cutting all the finest young plants to make coachmen's whips, thus

leaving only the crooked branches or suckers to form shrubs." The demand

for this purpose must have diminished with the spread of automobilism;

but the ravages wrought on holly trees for Christmas decoration are

deplorable, raiders finding a ready sale for their plunder in all the

big towns. It is a gentle custom to "weave the holly round the Christmas

hearth"; but it is desirable that the weavers should observe some

distinction between _meum_ and _tuum_--pronouns which they seem to

regard as synonymous when applied to holly.

Pliny repeats, without comment, the statement by Pythagoras that the

flowers of holly turn water into ice, and, further, that if a man throws

a staff of holly at a beast, and misses it, the staff will return to his

hand. Here we seem to have a report of the use of the boomerang; but

Parkinson, writing in the seventeenth century, expresses lofty disdain

for such fables. "This," says he, "I here relate that you may understand

the fond and vain conceit of those times, which I would to God we were

not in these days tainted withal." The Scottish clans of Drummond and

Maxwell of old bore the holly as their badge.

In Lowland Scots the word "hollen" preserves the original English form,

which in Ancren Riwle (about 1230) is written "holin," being direct from

the Anglo-Saxon "holen, holegn." Chaucer writes it "holm," a form which

occurs in such place-names as Holmwood and Holmesdale in Surrey. It is

also preserved in the name holm-oak, _i.e._ the ilex or evergreen oak,

whereof the young leaves bear holly-like spines. It is an interesting

feature in both these trees, as well as in the holly-leaved _Osmanthus_,

that the leaves produced above the level of browsing animals are

spineless, such defence being needless for the upper branches. This

characteristic has been called in question by persons founding their

observation upon cultivated varieties of the holly, some of which bear

none but spineless leaves, others none but spined ones. It will,

however, be found to be the normal habit in wild hollies.

It is a hazardous thing for a Saisneach to dabble in Celtic etymology,

yet will I venture to mention that the Gaelic for holly is _cuileann_,

and may be recognised in such place-names as Cullen in Banffshire and

Lanarkshire and (aspirated) Barhullion in Wigtownshire. Far seen Slieve

Gullion, a cone of the Mountains of Mourne, in Armagh (1,893 feet), is

popularly connected with the name of Cuileann, a worker in metals in the

reign of Conchobar Mac-Nessa, King of Ulster; but it is written Sliebhe

Cuilinn in the Irish Annals, which indicates Holly Mountain as the true

meaning. From the same source we are able to interpret Cullen, Cullion,

and Cullenach, the names of many Irish townlands, as derived from

vanished hollies; and Cuileanntrach Castle, in Meath, destroyed by one

Rory in 1155, was so called because of the hollies on the shore.

Pea-flowered Trees

The enormous natural order of _Leguminosæ_ or pea-flowered plants

contains many of the loveliest flowering plants in the world, but among

them there are but three which, attaining the stature of trees,

contribute importantly to the beauty of British woodlands--namely, the

common laburnum, the alpine laburnum, and the false acacia or locust

tree.

[Illustration: PAGODA TREE (_Sophora japonica_)

IN THE BOTANIC GARDEN, OXFORD]

Every country child knows the laburnum, but it is not every planter who

recognises that there are two distinct species, bearing a general

resemblance to each other, but differing in the time of flowering and in

other important respects. The species most usually planted is the common

laburnum (_L. vulgare_), and of a truth it would be difficult to name

any tree more delectable with its "dropping wells of fire." It is

uncertain how early it was brought from Central Europe to Great Britain;

Tradescant had it growing in 1596; but if "awburne," mentioned in an

Irish Act of Edward IV. (cap. iv., 1464) among the four woods prescribed

for the bow with which every Englishman in Ireland was to provide

himself, means "laburnum," it follows that this tree must have been

in cultivation from very early times. Indeed, the botanist Matthiolus

mentions it as being better even than the yew for bow-making; and we may

recognise the word "awburne" in the old Lowland Scots name for the

laburnum, "hoburn saugh," both being from the alternative Latin form,

_alburnus_. Gerard called it the bean-trefoil.

There is but one precaution to be observed in planting

laburnums--namely, that they should not be within reach of horses or

cattle, for the seeds contain a powerful poison called cytisine. Some

years ago, wishing to do wayfarers a service by enlivening a stretch of

high road, I caused a row of laburnums to be planted on either side. The

trees had attained some stature, when a Clydesdale mare belonging to the

tenant of a field bordering the road suddenly died, her death being

attributed to eating laburnum seeds, so the trees had to be uprooted.

Neither leaves nor bark appear to contain the poison, judging from the

avidity shown by rabbits in devouring them. No tree is so vulnerable _at

all ages_ by those detestable creatures as are the laburnum and the

holly. The largest stems are liable to be barked by them in hard

weather. Some writers have copied Pliny in stating that bees will not

visit the flowers of laburnum; but Pliny cannot have been writing from

personal observation, for modern bees, at least, show no aversion to the

yellow blossoms.

The common laburnum seldom exceeds 30 feet in height. The largest I have

seen stands in the laundry yard of Alnwick Castle, over 40 feet high,

wide-spreading, with a double stem measuring over 11 feet in girth near

the ground. When Loudon measured it in 1835 the girth was only 6 feet 11

inches. It is a magnificent sight when in bloom. The timber of laburnum,

though now greatly neglected in favour of foreign woods, is of admirable

quality for cabinet work, being of a dark olive tint, and taking a fine

polish. Seeing that the laburnum is perfectly hardy in our climate and

grows rapidly in any well-drained soil, it seems a pity that the fine

material it produces is not more commonly used.

[Illustration: FLOWER OF LABURNUM]

The alpine laburnum (_L. alpinum_) goes by the name of Scottish laburnum

in the nursery trade. Like the common laburnum, it is a native of

Central Europe, being, probably, merely the mountain form of the other,

to which it bears a strong general resemblance. The readiest means of

distinguishing between the two species consists in the foliage and young

shoots. In the common laburnum the leaf stalks, young shoots, and under

sides of the leaves are thickly clothed with a smooth, silky pubescence,

whereas in the alpine species these parts are quite bare, which causes

the tree when in leaf to appear of a deeper green than the other. But

the important difference for planters is that the alpine laburnum

blossoms a fortnight or so later than the common laburnum, thereby

prolonging the display of these charming trees. Elwes describes the

flowers of the alpine laburnum as being paler in colour than those of

the other species; but according to my own observation they are of the

richer gold. There are some fine specimens in the Edinburgh Botanic

Garden, verging upon 100 years old, about 40 feet high, and now past

their prime. The timber is of the same fine quality as that of the

common laburnum.

Some beautiful hybrids have been reared between these two species, and

planters cannot be too strongly recommended to use them. The variety

known as _L. watereri_ bears flower-tassels 15 to 18 inches long. As it

is propagated by grafting on the common species, care should be taken

not to allow the stock to overcome the scion, root suckers and stem

spray being rigidly suppressed.

Another curious hybrid is _L. adami_, which originated nearly a hundred

years ago in a French nursery through engrafting _Cytisus purpureus_ on

a laburnum stem, with the result that this graft-hybrid produces yellow

flowers on some branches and violet ones on others.

Mr. Gerald Loder has secured a charming effect at Wakehurst Place,

Sussex, by planting wistaria to grow with laburnum, the flower racemes

being similar in size and shape, but respectively of the complementary

colours, yellow and violet.

In writing of a beautiful tree as the false Acacia, no reflection upon

its integrity is implied in the epithet. The Robinia is so called

because Englishmen have chosen to call it an acacia, which it is not,

any more than it is a locust tree, as the Americans speak of it. Its

scientific title is _Robinia pseudacacia_, commemorating Jean Robin, who

first reared it in France in 1601 from seeds sent to him from North

America, where it is very widely spread and much valued for the

durability of its timber.

William Cobbett (1762-1835) conceived an extravagant idea of its merits,

and predicted that it would supersede all British trees, including the

oak; but this expectation has fallen far short of fulfilment. Among many

other landowners who were induced to act on the faith of it, Lord

Folkestone, a fellow-Radical of Cobbett's, planted 13,000 or 14,000

locusts at Coleshill Park, Berkshire, in 1824; but of these only very

few remain now, none of them over 60 feet high. The fact is, the

_Robinia_ loves more sun than it gets in most parts of our islands and a

hotter soil. This renders it unsuitable for planting in Scotland,

especially in the humid west. There are, indeed, a few large specimens

north of the Tweed, such as one at Cordale House, Dumbartonshire, 64

feet high by 7 feet in girth; another at Mauldslie Castle, Lanarkshire,

60 feet high by 8 feet 7 inches in girth; and, most northerly of all,

one at Gordon Castle, which in 1904 measured 56 feet high by 9 feet in

girth. But, as a rule, it is only to be found in good form in the

sunnier shires; besides, notwithstanding the strength of its timber when

felled, the growing boughs are exceedingly brittle, which makes the tree

unsuitable for exposure to high winds.

[Illustration: ROBINIA PSEUDACACIA

AT WINCHESTER]

Trees: A Woodland Notebook Containing Observations on Certain British and Exotic Trees · 第 8 / 14 段