WIRELESS RECEIVING STATION IN U. S. ARMY.]

[Illustration: Guglielmo Marconi, Inventor of wireless telegraphy.]

The Man Who Invented Wireless Telegraphy.

Communication without wires for thousands of miles across oceans, from

continent to continent, is a far cry from sending a wireless impulse

the length of a kitchen table. That is the development of twenty years.

To properly trace the development of wireless telegraphy, however, it

is necessary to go back eighty-three years to when, in 1831, Michael

Faraday discovered electro-magnetic induction between two entirely

separate circuits. Steinheil, of Munich, too, in 1838, suggested

that the metallic portion of a grounded electrical circuit might be

dispensed with and a system of wireless telegraphy established. Then,

in 1859, Bowman Lindsay demonstrated to the British Association his

method of transmitting messages by means of magnetism through and

across the water without submerged wires. In 1867 James Clerk Maxwell

laid down the theory of electro-magnetism and predicted the existence

of the electric waves that are now used in wireless telegraphy.

Dolbear, of Tufts College, in 1836, patented a plan for establishing

wireless communication by means of two insulated elevated plates, but

there is no evidence that the method proposed by him effected the

transmission of signals between stations separated by any distance.

A year later Heinrich Rudolph Hertz discovered the progressive

propagation of electro-magnetic action through space and accomplished

the most valuable work in this period of speculation and experiment.

Just twenty years ago, at his father’s country home in Bologna,

Guglielmo Marconi, then a lad just out of his ’teens, read of the

experiments of Hertz and conceived the first wireless telegraph

apparatus. This was completed some months later and a message in the

Morse Code was transmitted a distance of three or four feet, the length

of the table on which the apparatus rested.

Satisfied that he had laid the foundation of an epoch-making discovery

young Marconi pursued his experiments and filed the first patent on the

subject on June 2, 1896. Further experiments were carried on in London

during that year and at the request of Sir William H. Preece, of the

British Post Office, official tests were made, first over a distance of

about 100 yards and later for one and three-quarter miles.

During the year following Mr. Marconi gave several demonstrations to

the officials of the various European governments and communication

was established up to 34 miles. In July of this year, 1897, the first

commercial wireless telegraph company was incorporated in England and

the first Marconi station was erected at the Needles, Isle of Wight.

On June 3, 1898, Lord Kelvin visited this station and sent the first

paid Marconigram. A month later the events of the Kingstown Regatta in

Dublin were reported by wireless telegraphy for a local newspaper from

the steamer “Flying Huntress.” In August of that year the royal yacht

“Osborn” was equipped with a wireless set, in order that Queen Victoria

might communicate with the Prince of Wales, who was at Ladywood Cottage

and suffering from the results of an accident to his knee. For sixteen

days, constant and uninterrupted communication was maintained. Then on

Christmas Eve was inaugurated the first lightship wireless service,

messages being sent from the East Goodwin lightship to the lighthouse

at South Foreland.

[Illustration: PREPARING TO SEND MESSAGES ACROSS THE OCEAN

This photograph shows how wireless messages are prepared for direct

transmission across the ocean. The dots and dashes of the telegraphic

code are punched on tapes by skilled operators, thus insuring accuracy

and a permanent record of each message. Five or six operators, and

sometimes more, are steadily preparing these tapes, which are pasted

together and run through a machine which operates the key at each

perforation. A speed of 100 words a minute is thus obtained.]

Three months later the first marine rescue was effected through this

installation. The steamship “R. F. Matthews” ran into the lightship

and lifeboats from the South Foreland station promptly responded to

the wireless appeal for aid. The most important wireless event abroad

during the year 1899 was the establishing of communication across the

English Channel, a distance of thirty miles.

The American public next learned something of Marconi’s invention, for

in September and October of that year wireless telegraphy was employed

in reporting the International yacht races between the “Shamrock” and

the “Columbia” for a New York newspaper. At the conclusions of the

races, the naval authorities requested a series of trials, during which

wireless messages were exchanged between the cruiser “New York” and

the battleship “Massachusetts” up to a distance of about 36 miles. On

leaving America, Marconi fitted the liner “St. Paul” with his apparatus

and when 36 miles from the Needles Station, secured wireless reports

of the war in South Africa. These were printed aboard the vessel in a

leaflet called “The Transatlantic Times,” the first of the chain of

wireless newspapers now published daily on practically all passenger

steamships. Six field wireless sets were dispatched to South Africa

about this time and were later of considerable service in the Boer War.

[Illustration: In the foreground of this picture is seen the automatic

transmitter with the message perforated tape running through. This is

one of the smaller wireless equipments; much larger ones are used at

the new Marconi stations.]

The year 1900 brought the first commercial wireless contracts. By

agreement with the Norddeutscher Lloyd, Marconi apparatus was installed

on a lightship, a lighthouse and aboard the liner “Kaiser Wilhelm der

Grosse.” On July 4th the British Admiralty entered into a contract

for the installation of Marconi apparatus on thirty-two warships and

shore stations and the erection of the high power station at Poldhu was

commenced.

~WORLD WIDE USE OF THE WIRELESS~

Work on similar station at Cape Cod was begun early in 1901 and on

August 12th the famous Nantucket Island and Nantucket lightship

stations opened to report incoming vessels by wireless. Heavy gales

in September and November wrecked the masts at both Poldhu and

Cape Cod stations and these were replaced by four wooden towers,

210 feet high. Important experimental work was then shifted to St.

John’s, Newfoundland, and on December 12th and 13th, signals were

received across the Atlantic from Poldhu. This to Marconi was a great

achievement and the forerunner of the present day trans-atlantic

service. But with the announcement that the long dreamt of feat had

been accomplished a flood of vituperation from scientific men was let

loose. It was nonsense; it was deliberate deception; the reading was

in error, were among the comments. Another prank of the “young man

with a box,” one scientist termed it. It is amusing now to recall this

extraordinary treatment, but it was hardly so amusing to the young

inventor, then in his twenty-seventh year.

But in spite of the skepticism, developments followed rapidly from then

on and in 1902, the year in which the American Marconi Company was

established, full recognition to wireless telegraphy was given by the

various governments.

The wonderful growth of the Marconi system within the last twelve years

is well known to all and does not require detailing. But in view of its

youth as an industry and its inauspicious beginning, a glimpse into

what the present day Marconi system comprises may be interesting.

More than 1800 ships are equipped with Marconi wireless and its shore

stations are landmarks in practically every country on the globe.

Press and commercial messages are transmitted daily from continent to

continent direct.

Shore to ship and ship to shore business each year runs into millions

of words.

Marconi wireless within seventeen years, has become an absolute

necessity in the maritime field, an invaluable aid in others. Regular

communication has been established with icebound settlements and desert

communities, and official running orders transmitted to moving railway

trains. Its service is dependable under all conditions and embraces

activities and locations inaccessible to any other telegraph system.

Continuous service is maintained and wireless messages for all parts of

the world at greatly reduced rates are received at any Western Union

Office.

The direction finder and wireless compass are recent Marconi inventions.

A wide variety of types of Marconi equipment are designed for the

merchant marine, warships, submarines, pleasure craft, motor cars

and railroad trains; also portable signal corps sets, apparatus for

aircraft, cavalry sets, knapsack sets and high-power installations for

trans-ocean communication.

How Does a Fly Walk Upside Down?

There is a little sucker on the end of each of the fly’s feet which

makes his foot stick to the ceiling or any other place he walks, and

which he can control at will. It is made very much like the sucker

you have seen with which a boy can pick up a flat stone--a circular

piece of rubber or leather with a string in the middle and more or

less bell shaped underneath. A boy can pick up a flat stone with this

kind of a sucker by pressing the rubber or leather part down flat on

the stone and then pulling gently on it by the string. When he does

this he simply expels the air which is between the leather part of

the sucker and the stone, which creates a vacuum and the pressure of

the air on the outside part of the leather enables him to pick it up.

The fly has little suckers like these on each of his feet, and they

act automatically when he puts his foot down. Of course the sticking

power of each foot is adjusted to the weight of the fly, just as the

sticking or lifting power of the boy’s sucker is regulated by the

weight of the stone or other object he tries to pick up. If the weight

of the object is sufficient to overcome the sticking power which the

vacuum creates, the stone cannot be lifted.

What Is Money?

It is quite difficult to give a broad definition of money that will be

understood by all, for in different ages and lands many things have

been used as money besides the coins and bills which we think of only

when we think at all what money is. Anything that passes freely from

hand to hand in a community in the payment of debts and for goods

purchased, accepted freely by the person who offers it without any

reference to the person who offers it, and which can be in turn used

by the person accepting it to give to some one else in payment of debt

or for the purchase of goods, is money. This is rather a long sentence

and perhaps difficult to understand, and so we will try to analyze

what this means. If some one offered you a pretty stone as money in

payment of a debt, it would be as good as any kind of money if you in

turn could pass it on to any other person to whom you owed a debt or in

payment of something you bought. The stone might appear to you to be

valuable but it would not be good money unless you could count on every

one else in the community accepting it at the same value. If everybody

accepts it at the same value, it is as good as any kind of money. So

that anything which is acceptable to the people in any community as a

unit of value to pay debts, is good money, provided everybody thinks so

and accepts it that way. In this case, then any kind of substance might

become money provided it was used and accepted by everyone.

Why Do We Need Money?

We need money for the sake of the convenience which it provides in

making the exchange of one kind of wealth for another and as a standard

of value. When a community has adopted something or anything which

is regarded by all of the people as a standard of value, all of the

difficulties of trading disappear.

Who Originated Money?

The earliest tribes of savages did not need money because no individual

in the tribe owned anything personally. All the property of the tribe

belonged to the tribe as a whole and not to any particular person.

Later on, when different groups of savages came into contact with each

other, there arose the custom of bartering or exchanging things which

one tribe possessed and which the other tribe wanted. In that way arose

the business of trading or of what we call doing business, and soon the

need of something by which to measure the values of different things

arose. Some of the old Australian tribes had a tough green stone which

was valuable for making hatchets. Members of another tribe would see

some of this stone and notice what good hatchets could be made from

it--better hatchets than they had been able to make. Naturally they

wanted it so much that it became very valuable in their eyes and so

they came wanting to buy green stones. But they had nothing like what

we could call money today. They had, however, a good deal of red ochre

in their lands which they used to paint their bodies. They got this

red ochre out of the ground on their own lands just as the other tribe

got green stones out of its ground, and those who owned the green

stones which were good for making hatchets, wanted some red ochre very

much, and so they traded green stones for red ochre. The green stones

then took on a value in themselves for making exchanges for various

commodities, and before long became a kind of money inside and outside

the community so that when they wanted to obtain anything, the price

was put by the merchant as so many green stones and he accepted these

in payment for goods given in exchange. He was willing to do this

because he knew he could use them in making trades for almost anything

he might want, provided he had enough of the green stones. So you see

these green stones of the Australian tribe became a rudimentary kind of

money, just because a desire had arisen to possess them; and the red

ochre was actual money in the same sense, for when this tribe found

that other tribes would value this red ochre, they began getting the

things they wanted and paying for them in red ochre. But the “unit of

value” had to be developed to make a currency that was elastic. It

required something that could be carried about easily--in fact it had

to be something small enough so a number of units of value could be

carried about without too much trouble. The Indians of British Columbia

solved this difficulty of making an elastic currency by adopting as a

unit of value a haiqua shell which they wore in strings as ornamental

borders of their dresses--and one string of these shells was worth

one beaver’s skin. These shells then were real money and one of the

earliest forms of it.

The skins of animals were long used by savage tribes as money. The

skins were valuable in trading and a man’s fortune was reckoned by the

number of skins he owned. As soon as the animals became domesticated,

however, the whole animal replaced the skin as the unit of value. This

change undoubtedly came because a whole animal is more valuable than

only its skin. The first skins obtainable however were worn by wild

animals--the kind that the people could not deliver to someone else

alive and whole. But when the animals became domesticated, which meant

that man tamed them and kept them where he could control them at will,

the skin and the wild animal ceased to be a unit of value because it

was an uncertain kind of money. Among domestic animals, oxen and sheep

were the earliest forms of money--an ox was considered worth ten sheep.

This idea of using cattle as money was used by many tribes in many

lands. We find traces of it in the laws of Iceland. The Latin word

pecunia (pecus) shows that the earliest Roman money was composed of

cattle. The English word fee indicates this also. The Irish law records

show the same evidence of the use of cattle as money and within recent

years the cattle still form the basis of the currency of the Zulus and

Kaffirs.

When slavery became prominent many lands adopted the slaves as the unit

of value. A man’s wealth was reckoned by the number of slaves he owned.

Then, when the practice of agriculture became more common, people

used the products of the soil as money--maize, olive oil, cocoanuts,

tea and corn--the latter is said to pass current as actual money in

certain parts of Norway now. They used these products of the soil for

money even in our own country. Our ancestors in Maryland and Virginia

before the Revolutionary War, and even after, used tobacco as money.

They passed laws making tobacco money and paid the salaries of the

government officials and collected all taxes in tobacco.

Other early forms of money were ornaments and these serve the purpose

of money among all uncivilized tribes. In India they used cowrie

shells--a small yellowish-white shell with a fine gloss. The Fiji

Islanders used whales’ teeth; some of the South Sea Island tribes used

red feathers; other nations used mineral products as money--such as

salt in Abyssinia and Mexico.

Up to this point we have talked about the things used as money from

the standpoint of primitive forms of money. Today the metals have

practically driven all these other crude forms of money out.

Metallic Forms of Money.

~WHY WE USE METALS FOR COINING~

The use of metals as money goes far back in the history of civilization

but it has never been possible to trace the historical order of the

adoption of the various metals for the purposes. Iron according to the

statement of Aristotle was at one time extensively used as money.

Copper, in conjunction with iron, was used in early times as money in

China; and until comparatively a short time ago was used for the coins

of smaller value in Japan. Iron spikes were used in Central Africa

and nails in Scotland; lead money is now used in Burmah. Copper has

long been used as money. The early coins of England were made of tin.

Finally, however, came silver and silver was the principal form of

money up to a few years ago. It was the basis of Greek coins introduced

at Rome in 269 B. C. Most of the money of Medieval times was composed

of silver.

The earliest traces of gold used as money is seen in pictures of

ancient Egyptians “weighing in scales heaps of gold and silver rings.”

Why Do We Use Gold and Silver as Money Principally?

There are a good many reasons why gold and silver have become almost

universal materials for use as money. Perhaps this will be better

understood if these reasons are set down in order.

1st. It is necessary that the material out of which money is made

should be valuable, but nothing was ever used as money that had not

first become desirable and, therefore, valuable as money. This is only

one of the incidental reasons for taking gold and silver for coining

money.

2nd. To serve its purpose best, money should be easy to carry

around--in other words, its value should be high in proportion to its

weight.

The absence of this quality made the early forms of money such as

skins, corn, tobacco, etc., undesirable. It was difficult to carry very

much money about. Imagine the skin of a sheep worth a dollar, say,

and having to carry ten of them down to pay the grocer. To a certain

extent this difficulty occurred with iron and copper money and in times

when they used live cattle it was a pretty expensive job to pay your

debts because, while the cattle could move, it was still expensive to

drive them from place to place. A man who accepted a thousand cattle

in payment had to go to some expense in getting them home. Then it was

expensive to have money when live cattle were used because the cattle,

of course, had to be fed and from that point of view the poor man who

had no money was better off than the rich man who had money. When

cattle were used as money it cost a lot to keep it. Our kind of money

doesn’t eat anything; in fact, if you put it in a savings bank, it will

earn interest money for you. But when cattle were used as money it cost

a great deal to keep them and so it was worse than not earning any

interest.

3rd. Another quality that money should possess is divisibility without

damage and also the quality of being united again. This quality is

possessed by the metals in every sense because they can be fused, while

skins and precious stones suffer in value greatly when they are divided.

4th. The material out of which money is made should be the same

throughout in quality and weight so that one unit of money should be

worth as much as any other unit. This could never be true of skins or

cattle as the difference in the size of skins is very great sometimes,

and a small skin from the same animal could not be worth as much as a

large one, or a skin of an animal of inferior quality so valuable as a

very fine one.

5th. Another quality which money should possess is durability. This

requirement made it necessary to use something else besides animals or

vegetable substances. Animals die and vegetables will not keep and so

lose their value. Even iron is apt to rust and through that process

lose more or less of its value.

6th. The materials out of which money is made should be easy to

distinguish and their value easy to determine. For this reason such

things as precious stones are not good to use as money because it

takes an expert to determine their value and even they are not always

certain to be correct.

7th. Then a very important quality that the material out of which money

is made is that its value should be steady. The value of cattle varies

very greatly and, in fact, most of the materials out of which the first

currencies were made were subject to quick change in value in a short

time. The value of gold and silver does not change excepting at long

intervals. Gold and silver are both durable and easily recognizable.

They can be melted, divided and united. The same is true of other

metallic substances, but iron as stated is subject to rust and its

value is low; lead is too soft. Tin will break, and both of them and

copper also are of low value. Gold and silver change only slowly in

value when the change at all; they do not lose any of their value by

age, rust or other cause; they are hard metals and do not, therefore,

wear. Their value in proportion to the bulk of the pieces used for

money is so large that the money made from them can be carried without

discomfort and it is almost impossible to imitate them.

Who Made the First Cent?

Vermont was the first state to issue copper cents. In June, 1785, she

granted the authority to Ruben Harmon, Jr., to make money for the state

for two years. In October of the same year, Connecticut granted the

right to coin 10,000 pounds in copper cents, known as the Connecticut

cent of 1785. Massachusetts, in 1786, established a mint and coined

$60,000 in cents and half cents. In the same year, New Jersey granted

the right to coin $10,000 at 15 coppers to the shilling. In 1781 the

Continental Congress directed Robert Morris to investigate the matter

of governmental coinage. He proposed a standard based on the Spanish

dollar, consisting of 100 units, each unit to be called a cent. His

plan was rejected. In 1784, Jefferson proposed to Congress, that the

smallest coin should be of copper, and that 200 of them should pass for

one dollar. The plan was adopted, but in 1786, 100 was substituted. In

1792 the coinage of copper cents, containing 264 grains, and half cents

in proportion, was authorized; their weight was subsequently reduced.

In 1853 the nickel cent was substituted and the half cent discontinued,

and in 1864 the bronze cent was introduced, weighing 48 grains and

consisting of 95 per cent. of copper, and the remainder of tin and zinc.

How Did the Name Uncle Sam Originate?

The name Uncle Sam is a jocular name long in use for the Government of

the United States.

Shortly after the war of 1812 was declared, Elbert Anderson of New

York State, who was a contractor for the army, went to Troy, New York,

to purchase a quantity of provisions. At that place the provisions

were inspected, the official inspectors being two brothers named

Wilson--Ebenezer and Samuel. The latter was very popular among the men

and was known as “Uncle Sam Wilson” and everybody called him that.

The boxes in which the provisions were packed were stamped with four

letters, E. A. for Elbert Anderson, and U. S. for United States. One of

the men engaged in making the inspection asked another of the workmen

who happened to be a jocular fellow, what the letters E. A. U. S. on

the boxes stood for. He said in reply that he did not know but thought

they probably meant Elbert Anderson and Uncle Sam Wilson, and that they

had left off the W which would stand for Wilson. The suggestion caught

on quickly and as such things often do, the joke spread rapidly so that

everybody soon thought of the name “Uncle Sam” whenever they saw the

letters U. S. on anything or in any place.

The suit of striped trousers and long tailed coat and beaver hat

in which Uncle Sam is now always represented in pictures, was the

inspiration of the famous cartoonist.

[Illustration: THE WORLD’S BREAD LOAVES

Egypt

2500 B.C.

Unleavened Bread

2000 B.C.

Pompeii

50 A.D.

The book of wonders · 第 243 / 376 题