THE MELDOMETER.

The apparatus which I propose to call by the above name

([mu][epsilon][lambda][delta][omega], to melt) consists of an adjunct to

the mineralogical microscope, whereby the melting-points of minerals may

be compared or approximately determined and their behavior watched at

high temperatures either alone or in the presence of reagents.

As I now use it, it consists of a narrow ribbon of platinum (2 mm. wide)

arranged to traverse the field of the microscope. The ribbon, clamped in

two brass clamps so as to be readily renewable, passes bridgewise over a

little scooped-out hollow in a disk of ebony (4 cm. diam.). The clamps

also take wires from a battery (3 Groves cells); and an adjustable

resistance being placed in circuit, the strip can be thus raised in

temperature up to the melting-point of platinum.

The disk being placed on the stage of the microscope the platinum strip

is brought into the field of a 1" objective, protected by a glass slip

from the radiant heat. The observer is sheltered from the intense light

at high temperatures by a wedge of tinted glass, which further can be

used in photometrically estimating the temperature by using it to obtain

extinction of the field. Once for all approximate estimations of the

temperature of the field might be made in terms of the resistance of the

platinum strip, the variation of such resistance with rise of

temperature being known. Such observations being made on a suitably

protected strip might be compared with the wedge readings, the latter

being then used for ready determinations. Want of time has hindered me

from making such observations up to this.

The mineral to be experimented on is placed in small fragments near the

center of the platinum ribbon, and closely watched while the current is

increased, till the melting-point of the substance is apparent. Up to

the present I have only used it comparatively, laying fragments of

different fusibilities near the specimen. In this way I have melted

beryl, orthoclase, and quartz. I was much surprised to find the last

mineral melt below the melting-point of platinum. I have, however, by me

as I write, a fragment, formerly clear rock-crystal, so completely fused

that between crossed Nicols it behaves as if an amorphous body, save in

the very center where a speck of flashing color reveals the remains of

molecular symmetry. Bubbles have formed in the surrounding glass.

Orthoclase becomes a clear glass filled with bubbles: at a lower

temperature beryl behaves in the same way.

Topaz whitens to a milky glass--apparently decomposing, throwing out

filmy threads of clear glass and bubbles of glass which break,

liberating a gas (fluorine?) which, attacking the white-hot platinum,

causes rings of color to appear round the specimen. I have now been

using the apparatus for nearly a month, and in its earliest days it led

me right in the diagnosis of a microscopical mineral, iolite, not before

found in our Irish granite, I think. The unlooked-for characters of the

mineral, coupled with the extreme minuteness of the crystals, led me

previously astray, until my meldometer fixed its fusibility for me as

far above the suspected bodies.

Carbon slips were at first used, as I was unaware of the capabilities of

platinum.

A form of the apparatus adapted, at Prof. Fitzgerald's suggestion, to

fit into the lantern for projection on the screen has been made for me

by Yeates. In this form the heated conductor passes both below and above

the specimen, which is regarded from a horizontal direction.

Scientific American Supplement, No. 531, March 6, 1886 · 第 27 / 54 题