By J. STURGEON, Engineer of the Birmingham Compressed Air Power Company.
In the article on "Gas, Air, and Water Power" in the _Journal_ for Dec.
8 last, you state that you await with some curiosity my reply to certain
points in reference to the compressed air power schemes alluded to in
that article. I now, therefore, take the liberty of submitting to you
the arguments on my side of the question (which are substantially the
same as those I am submitting to Mr. Hewson, the Borough Engineer of
Leeds). The details and estimates for the Leeds scheme are not yet in a
forward enough state to enable me to give them at present; but the whole
case is sufficiently worked out for Birmingham to enable a fair
deduction to be made therefrom as regards the utility of the system in
other towns. In Birmingham, progress has been delayed owing to
difficulties in procuring a site for the works, and other matters of
detail. We have, however, recently succeeded in obtaining a suitable
place, and making arrangements for railway siding, water supply, etc.;
and we hope to be in a position to start early in the present year.
I inclose (1) a tabulated summary of the estimates for Birmingham
divided into stages of 3,000 gross indicated horse power at a time; (2)
a statement showing the cost to consumers in terms of indicated horse
power and in different modes, more or less economical, of applying the
air power in the consumers' engines; (3) a tracing showing the method of
laying the mains; (4) a tracing showing the method of collecting the
meter records at the central station, by means of electric apparatus,
and ascertaining the exact amount of leakage. A short description of the
two latter would be as well.
TABLE I.--_Showing the Progressive Development of the Compressed Air
System in stages of 3000 Indicated Horse Power (gross) at a Time, and
the Profits at each Stage_
_____________________________________________________________________________
Gross | 3000 | 6000 | 9000 | 12,000 | 15,000 |
Indicated | Ind. | Ind. | Ind. | Ind. | Ind. |
Horse Power | H.P. | H.P. | H.P. | H.P. | H.P. |
at Central | | | | | |
Works: | | | | | |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thousands of | 1,080,000 | 2,160,000 |3,240,000 | 4,320,000 |5,400,000 |
Cubic Feet at 45 | | | | | |
lbs. pressure | | | | | |
at engines | | | | | |
Deduction for | 17,928 | 70,927 | 154,429 | 267,529 | 409,346 |
friction and | | | | | |
leakage | | | | | |
Estimated net | 1,062,072 | 2,089,073 |3,085,571 | 4,052,471 |4,990,654 |
delivery | | | | | |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CAPITAL | | | | | |
EXPENDITURE-- | | | | | |
Purchase and pre-| £12,500 | (amounts below apply to extension of works) |
paration of land | | | | | |
Machinery | 27,854 | £25,595 | £25,595 | £25,595 | £25,595 |
Mains | 10,328 | 10.328 | 10,328 | 10,328 | 10,328 |
Buildings | 8,505 | 4,516 | 4,632 | 4,614 | 4,594 |
Parlimentary and | | | | | |
general expenses,| 20,000 | .. | .. | .. | .. |
royalty, &c. | | | | | |
Engineering | 3,268 | 1,820 | 1,825 | 1,824 | 8,823 |
Previous Capit-| | 82,455 | 124,714 | 167,094 | 209,455 |
al Expenditure | .. | | | | |
Total Cap. Exp. | £82,455 | £124,714 | £167,094 | £209,455 | £251,795 |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
ANNUAL CHARGES-- | | | | | |
Salaries, wages, | | | | | |
& general working| £6,405 | £7,855 | £9,305 | £10,955 | £12,480 |
expenses | | | | | |
Repairs, renewals| 2,780 | 5,198 | 7,622 | 10,045 | 12,467 |
&c.(reserve fund)| | | | | |
Coal, water, &c. | 1,950 | 3,900 | 5,850 | 7,800 | 9,750 |
Rates | 370 | 674 | 980 | 1,285 | 1,585 |
Contingencies of | | | | | |
horse power = 5 | 575 | 881 | 1,187 | 1,504 | 1,814 |
per cent on above| | | | | |
Total Ann. Exp. | £12,080 | £18,508 | £24,944 | £31,589 | £38,096 |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revenue at 5d. | | | | | |
per 1000 cub. ft.| 22,126 | 43,522 | 64,282 | 84,426 | 103,971 |
(average) | | | | | |
Profit |12.18 p.ct.|20.06 p.ct.|23.54 p.ct.|25.22 p.ct.|26.16 p.ct.|
|= 10,046 | = 25,014 | = 39,338 | = 52,837 | = 65,875 |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
TABLE II.--_Cost of Air Power in Terms of Indicated Horse Power_.
Abbreviated column headings:
Qty. Air: Quantity of Air at 45 lbs. Pressure required per Ind. H.P. per
Hour.
Cost/Hr.: Cost per Hour at 5d. per 1000 Cubic Feet.
Cost/Hr. w/rebate: Cost per Hour with Rebate when Profits reach 26 per
Cent.
Cost/Yr.: Cost per Annum (2700 Hours) at 5d. per 1000 Cubic Feet.
Cost/Yr. w/rebate: Cost per Annum with Rebate when Profits reach 26 per
Cent.
Abbreviated row headings:
CASE 1.--Where air at 45 lbs. pressure is re-heated to 320° Fahr., and
expanded to atmospheric pressure.
CASE 2.--Where air at 45 lbs. pressure is heated by boiling water to
212° Fahr., and expanded to atmospheric pressure.
CASE 3.--Where air is used expansively without re-heating, whereby
intensely cold air is exhausted, and may be used for ice making, &c.
CASE 4.--Where air is heated to 212° Fahr., and the terminal pressure is
11.3 lbs. above that of the atmosphere
CASE 5.--Where the air is used without heating, and cut off at one-third
of the stroke, as in ordinary slide-valve engines
CASE 6.--Where the air is used without re-heating and without expansion.
_____________________________________________________________________
| Qty. Air | Cost/Hr. | Cost/Hr. | Cost/Yr. | Cost/Yr. |
| | | w/rebate | | w/rebate |
| Cub. Ft. | d. | d. | £ s. d. | £ s. d.|
---------------------------------------------------------------------
CASE 1 | 125.4 | 0.627 | 0.596 | 7 1 1 | 6 14 0½|
CASE 2 | 140.4 | 0.702 | 0.667 | 7 17 11 | 7 10 0 |
CASE 3 | 178.2 | 0.891 | 0.847 | 10 0 5½ | 9 10 5½|
CASE 4 | 170.2 | 0.851 | 0.809 | 9 11 5½ | 9 1 10½|
CASE 5 | 258.0 | 1.290 | 1.226 | 14 10 3 | 13 15 9 |
CASE 6 | 331.8 | 1.659 | 1.576 | 18 13 3 | 17 14 7 |
_____________________________________________________________________
The great thing to guard against is leakage. If the pipes were simply
buried in the ground, it would be almost impossible to trace leakage, or
even to know of its existence. The income of the company might be
wasting away, and the loss never suspected until the quarterly returns
from the meters were obtained from the inspectors. Only then would it be
discovered that there must be a great leak (or it might be several
leaks) somewhere. But how would it be possible to trace them among 20 or
30 miles of buried pipes? We cannot break up the public streets. The
very existence of the concern depends upon (1) the _daily_ checking of
the meter returns, and comparison with the output from the air
compressors, so as to ascertain the amount of leakage; (2) facility for
tracing the locality of a leak; and (3) easy access to the mains with
the minimum of disturbance to the streets. It will be readily
understood, from the drawings, how this is effected. First, the pipes
are laid in concrete troughs, near the surface of the road, with
removable concrete covers strong enough to stand any overhead traffic.
At intervals there are junctions for service connections, with street
boxes and covers serving as inspection chambers. These chambers are also
provided over the ball-valves, which serve as stop-valves in case of
necessity, and are so arranged that in case of a serious breach in the
portion of main between any two of them, the rush of air to the breach
will blow them up to the corresponding seats and block off the broken
portion of main. The air space around the pipe in the concrete trough
will convey for a long distance the whistling noise of a leak; and the
inspectors, by listening at the inspection openings, will thus be
enabled to rapidly trace their way almost to the exact spot where there
is an escape. They have then only to remove the top surface of road
metal and the concrete cover in order to expose the pipe and get at the
breach. Leaks would mostly be found at joints; and, by measuring from
the nearest street opening, the inspectors would know where to break
open the road to arrive at the probable locality of the leak. A very
slight leak can be heard a long way off by its peculiar whistling sound.
[Illustration: COMPRESSED AIR POWER]
The next point is to obtain a daily report of the condition of the mains
and the amount of leakage. It would be impracticable to employ an army
of meter inspectors to take the records daily from all the meters in the
district. We therefore adopt the method of electric signaling shown in
the second drawing. In the engineer's office, at the central station, is
fixed the dial shown in Fig. 1. Each consumer's meter is fitted with the
contact-making apparatus shown in Pig. 4, and in an enlarged form in
Figs. 5 and 6, by which a current is sent round the electro-magnet, D
(Fig. 1), attracting the armature, and drawing the disk forward
sufficiently for the roller at I to pass over the center of one of the
pins, and so drop in between that and the next pin, thus completing the
motion, and holding the disk steadily opposite the figure. This action
takes place on any meter completing a unit of measurement of (say) 1,000
cubic feet, at which point the contact makers touch. But suppose one
meter should be moving very slowly, and so retaining contact for some
time, while other meters were working rapidly; the armature at D would
then be held up to the magnet by the prolonged contact maintained by the
slow moving meter, and so prevent the quick working meters from
actuating it; and they would therefore pass the contact points without
recording. A meter might also stop dead at the point of contact on
shutting off the air, and so hold up the armature; thus preventing
others from acting. To obviate this, we apply the disengaging apparatus
shown at L (Fig. 4). The contact maker works on the center, m, having an
armature on its opposite end. On contact being made, at the same time
that the magnet, D, is operated, the one at L is also operated,
attracting the armature, and throwing over the end of the contact maker,
l¹, on to the non-conducting side of the pin on the disk. Thus the whole
movement is rendered practically instantaneous, and the magnet at D is
set at liberty for the next operation. A resistance can be interposed at
L, if necessary, to regulate the period of the operation. The whole of
the meters work the common dial shown in Fig. 1, on which the gross
results only are recorded; and this is all we want to know in this way.
The action is so rapid, owing to the use of the magnetic disengaging
gear, that the chances of two or more meters making contact at the same
moment are rendered extremely small. Should such a thing happen, it
would not matter, as it is only approximate results that we require in
this case; and the error, if any, would add to the apparent amount of
leakage, and so be on the right side. Of course, the record of each
consumer's meter would be taken by the inspector at the end of every
quarter, in order to make out the bill; and the totals thus obtained
would be checked by the gross results indicated by the main dial. In
this way, by a comparison of these results, a coefficient would soon be
arrived at, by which the daily recorded results could be corrected to an
extremely accurate measurement. At the end of the working day, the
engineer has merely to take down from the dial in his office the total
record of air measured to the consumers, also the output of air from the
compressors, which he ascertains by means of a continuous counter on the
engines, and the difference between the two will represent the loss. If
the loss is trifling, he will pass it over; if serious, he will send out
his inspectors to trace it. Thus there could be no long continued
leakage, misuse, or robbery of the air, without the company becoming
aware of the fact, and so being enabled to take measures to stop or
prevent it. The foregoing are absolutely essential adjuncts to any
scheme of public motive power supply by compressed air, without which we
should be working in the dark, and could never be sure whether the
company were losing or making money. With them, we know where we are and
what we are doing.
Referring to the estimates given in Table I., I may explain that the
item of repairs and renewals covers 10 per cent. on boilers and gas
producers, 5 per cent. on engines, 5 per cent. on buildings, and 5 per
cent. on mains. Considering that the estimates include ample fitting
shops, with the best and most suitable tools, and that the wages list
includes a staff of men whose chief work would be to attend to repairs,
etc., I think the above allowances ample. Each item also includes 5 per
cent. for contingencies.
I have commenced by giving all the preceding detail, in order to show
the groundwork on which I base the estimate of the cost of compressed
air power to consumers, in terms of indicated horse power per annum, as
given in Table II. I may say that, in estimating the engine power and
coal consumption, I have not, as in the original report, made purely
theoretical calculations, but have taken diagrams from engines in actual
use (although of somewhat smaller size than those intended to be
employed), and have worked out the results therefrom. It will, I hope,
be seen that, with all the safeguards we have provided, we may fairly
reckon upon having for sale the stated quantity of air produced by means
of the plant, as estimated, and at the specified annual cost; and that
therefore the statement of cost per indicated horse power per annum may
be fairly relied upon. Thus the cost of compressed air to the consumer,
based upon an _average_ charge of 5d. per 1,000 cubic feet, will vary
from £6 14s. per indicated horse power per annum to £18 13s. 3d.,
according to circumstances and mode of application.
A compressed air motor is an exceedingly simple machine--much simpler
than an ordinary steam engine. But the air may also be used in an
ordinary steam engine; and in this case it can be much simplified in
many details. Very little packing is needed, as there is no nuisance
from gland leakage; the friction is therefore very slight. Pistons and
glands are packed with soapstone, or other self-lubricating packing; and
no oil is required except for bearings, etc. The company will undertake
the periodical inspection and overhauling of engines supplied with their
power, all which is included in the estimates. The total cost to
consumers, with air at an average of 5d. per 1,000 cubic feet, may
therefore be fairly taken as follows:
Min. Max.
Cost of air used £6 14 0½ £18 13 3
Oil. waste, packing, etc. 1 0 0 1 0 0
Interest, depreciation,
etc., 12½ per cent. on
£10, the cost of engine
per indicated
horse power 1 5 0 1 5 0
-------- ---------
£8 19 0½ £20 18 3
The maximum case would apply only to direct acting engines, such as
Tangye pumps, air power hammers, etc., where the air is full on till the
end of the stroke, and where there is no expansion. The minimum given is
at the average rate of 5d. per 1,000 cubic feet; but as there will be
rates below this, according to a sliding scale, we may fairly take it
that the lowest charge will fall considerably below £6 per indicated
horse power per annum.--_Journal of Gas Lighting_.
* * * * *