NO. III.--BLOWING MEN.

What makes men blow? “I’ll be blowed if I know.” Such might be the answer

in nine hundred and ninety-nine cases out of a thousand; and the object

of this paper is to invite that thousandth individual who is versed in

the philosophy of blowing to come forth and settle the question.

Every body knows why butchers blow, and flute-players, and glass-blowers,

&c., and why some men puff at auctions; but the question is, why, without

any conceivable motive either of business or pleasure, certain men, while

circulating through the streets of Dublin perhaps on a breezeless day,

have been seen to distend their cheeks, and discharge a great volume of

breath into the face of the serene and unoffending atmosphere.

One of the introductory chapters in Tom Jones is devoted to proving that

authors always write the better for being acquainted with the subjects

on which they write. If this position be true (as I believe it is), I

may seem deserving of a blowing up for venturing on my present theme.

However, my object (as I have already hinted) in this, as in my first

sketch, is rather to court than to convey information. If my brief

notices of Fox and Smut contained in said sketch could at all serve to

promote the study of _cat_optrics, I would not consider the time it

cost me misspent. (And, by the bye, Mr Editor, I know somebody who, if

he chose, could inform your readers how he once saw one of his own cats

actually _assisting at a surgical operation_!) In like manner, if the

following meagre result of my attempt towards developing the philosophy

of blowing should excite inquiry on a subject never, I believe, broached

before, I would feel very thankful for any information anent it that

might reach me through the medium of the Irish Penny Journal.

Blowing men form a small, a very small, part of the community. During

some forty years’ experience of the Dublin flags, I have met with

only four specimens of this genus. Yet limited as is the number of my

specimens, I am constrained to distribute them into two classes--one

consisting of _three_ individuals, the other, of the remaining _one_. My

first-class men blew all alike--right “ahead,” as the Americans say; my

fourth man protruded his chin, and breathed rather than blew somewhat

upwards, as if he wanted to treat the tip of his nose to a vapour-bath.

What characteristics, then, did my triad of blowers possess in common,

and from what community of idiosyncrasy did they agree in a practice

unknown to the generality of mankind? The latter question I avow my

inability to answer: on the former I can perhaps throw a little twilight.

The principal man among them in point of rank--a late noble and facetious

judge--was by far the most inveterate blower in the class: his puff

was perpetual, like the mahogany dye of his boot-tops. One point of

resemblance I have traced between the peer and his two compeers: he was

a _proud_ man. In proof of this allegation I have the evidence of his

own avowal:--“I’m the first peer of my family, but I’m as proud as the

old nobility of England.” Of the other pair, one I know to be proud,

the other I believe to be so. Here then is one element--PRIDE: another

I conceive to be WEALTH. My first-class blowers were all rich men:

nay, the youngest among them never ventured on blowing, to the best of

my belief, till he had gotten a good slice of a quarter of a million

whereof his uncle died possessed. I was standing one day at the door of

a bookseller’s shop in Suffolk Street, deeply intent upon nothing, when

my gentleman passed by on the opposite side. My eyes, ready for any new

object, idly followed him, and as he crossed to Nassau Street he blew.

The offer was fair enough for a beginner, but it would not do--he wanted

_fat_. No man much under the episcopal standard of girth should think of

blowing: of this I feel a perfect conviction.

As for my solitary second-class man, the unique character of his blowing,

or breathing, may have been but an emanation of his unique mind. He was,

as the song says, “werry pecooliar”--an extensive medical practitioner

among the poor, though not a medical man--the editor of an agricultural

journal, though unacquainted with farming--a moral man, yet the avowed

admirer of the lady of an invalid whose expected death was to be the

signal for their union: the death came, but the union was never effected.

Groping then, as I do, in the dark, I would with great diffidence submit,

that _certain_ individuals, being encumbered with PRIDE, WEALTH, and

FAT, are hence, somehow, under both a mental and physical necessity of

blowing: why _all_ individuals thus encumbered do not adopt the practice,

is matter for consideration. As a further clue to investigation I may

add, that although the union of the above three qualifications in one

individual is by no means peculiar to Dublin, yet in Dublin alone have

I ever seen men blow, and that none of my quaternion of blowing men was

of Milesian descent: one was of Saxon, another of Scottish race, and the

remaining two were sprung from Huguenots.

I now conclude, submissively craving “a word and a blow” from any of the

readers or writers of the Irish Penny Journal who may be able to give

them to me in the shape of facts or fancies likely to lend to the full

solution of a question which has been for years my torment, namely--“What

makes men blow?”

The Irish Penny Journal, Vol. 1 No. 23, December 5, 1840 · 第 14 / 15 题