CHAPTER XXV. THE CLOSING SCENES OF CÆSAR’S LIFE

THE END OF THE AFRICAN WAR

The suicide of Cato was the consistent act of a heathen philosopher,

determined at least to maintain the purity of his soul uncontaminated by

base compliances. Assuredly the calm dignity of its execution demands

our respect and compassion, if not the principle on which it was based.

Far different was the manner in which the rude barbarian Juba and the

coarse soldier Petreius ran forward to meet their ends. They had escaped

together from the field of battle, and the Numidian offered to provide

shelter for his companion in one of his own strongholds. The Roman

province was so ill-disposed towards the barbarian chief that he was

obliged to hide himself by day in the most secluded villages, and roam

the country on his homeward flight during the hours of darkness. In this

way he reached Zama, his second capital, where his wives and children,

together with his most valuable treasures, were deposited. This place he

had taken pains to fortify at the commencement of the war, with works

of great extent and magnitude. But on his appearance before the walls,

the inhabitants deliberately shut their gates against him and refused to

admit the enemy of the victorious Roman. Before setting out on his last

expedition, Juba had constructed an immense pyre in the centre of the

city, declaring his intention, if fortune went ill with him, of heaping

upon it everything he held most dear and precious, together with the

murdered bodies of the principal citizens, and then taking his own place

on the summit, and consuming the whole in one solemn conflagration.

But the Numidians had no sympathy with this demonstration of their

sovereign’s despair, and resolved not to admit him within their walls.

Juba having tried in vain every kind of menace and entreaty, to which no

reply was vouchsafed, at last retired, but only to experience a similar

reception in every other quarter to which he resorted. He at least had

little to hope from the clemency which the victor had extended to his

conquered countrymen. His companion, hard as his own iron corslet,

scorned to accept it. The fugitives supped together, and, flushed with

the fumes of the banquet, challenged each other to mutual slaughter. They

were but unequally matched; the old veteran was soon despatched by his

more active antagonist, but Juba was constant in his resolution, and only

demanded the assistance of an attendant to give himself the last fatal

stroke.

Nor was the fate of Considius, of Afranius, and Faustus Sulla less

disastrous. The first of these had abandoned the defence of Thysdrus

at the approach of the forces which Cæsar despatched against it, and

attempted to make his escape with the treasures he had amassed into

the territories, until now friendly, of the Numidian chieftains. He

was destroyed, for the sake of his hoarded booty, by the Gætulians who

accompanied him in his flight. The others had retained the command of

a squadron of Scipio’s cavalry, and after burning one town which had

shut its gates against them had made a desperate attack on the military

post which Cato maintained outside the walls of Utica, to wreak an

unworthy vengeance on the Cæsarian partisans there kept in custody.

Baffled in this object they had made their way into Utica, while Cato

still commanded there, and had added bitterness to his last days by the

violence and ferocity of their behaviour. From thence they led their

ruffians along the coast in the hope of finding means of transporting

them into Spain. But on their way they fell in with Sittius, who was

advancing to join Cæsar; their men were routed and themselves taken. The

bands of the Roman adventurer carried on war with the same brutality as

the barbarians among whom they practised it. The captors quarrelled among

themselves; their passions were inflamed, perhaps, in the distribution of

the prisoners and the booty; and both Afranius and Faustus were killed in

the fray which ensued. But the massacre of the son of the dictator Sulla,

accidental as it was, or at least unauthorized, could hardly fail of

being charged as a deliberate act upon the representative of Marius.

While his foes were thus flying and falling, Cæsar advanced triumphantly

from the scene of his last exploit, receiving the submission of the

towns on his way, carrying off the stores and treasure collected for

his enemies’ use, and leaving garrisons to retain them in fidelity. As

he drew near to Utica he was met by L. Cæsar, whose petition for mercy

seems to have been confined to his own person, and to whom, as well

as to a long list of distinguished nobles, the conqueror extended the

promise of his protection. He lamented with every appearance of sincerity

that Cato had robbed him of the pleasure of pardoning one who, of all

his antagonists, had been the most obstinate in his opposition, and

the most inveterate in his hatred. The fatal compliance of the Utican

senators, who, not content with obeying his enemies’ commands, had

contributed money to their cause, furnished him with a specious pretence

for rifling their coffers of the treasures he now most urgently needed.

His requisitions amounted to two hundred millions of sesterces. At the

same time the city of Thapsus was mulcted in two millions, and the

company of Roman traders in three. Hadrumetum paid down three millions,

and its Roman capitalists five. Leptis and Thysdrus also suffered in due

proportion. A grand auction was held at Zama for the sale of all the

objects of Juba’s royal state, and of the goods of the Roman citizens

who had borne arms under the tyrant’s orders. Upon the people who had so

boldly defied their sovereign, and refused him admittance within their

walls, honours and largesses were munificently showered, and the taxes

heretofore demanded for the royal treasury were partially remitted by the

collectors of the republic. But the country of Numidia was deprived of

its independence, and definitely reduced to the form of a province, under

the proconsulate of Sallust. The rewarded and the punished acquiesced

equally in the conqueror’s dispositions; the submission of Africa to his

authority was from thenceforth complete. The Uticans were allowed to

commemorate with a funeral and a statue the humane and noble conduct of

their late governor.

THE RETURN TO ROME

Cæsar settled the affairs of Africa with his usual despatch, and sailed

from Utica on the fourteenth day of April, 46 B.C. On his way to Italy,

he stopped at Caralis, in Sardinia. The aid which the island had afforded

to his adversaries furnished him with a decent pretext for extorting

from the inhabitants large sums of money. At the end of the same month

he again weighed anchor; but the prevalence of easterly winds drove him

repeatedly to shore, and he at last reached Rome on the twenty-eighth day

after his departure from the Sardinian capital. The reports he received

at this time of the revival of the republican cause in Spain did not

give him much uneasiness. Cneius had been detained by sickness in the

Baleares, and the fugitives from the field of Thapsus had been almost all

cut off in their attempts to reach the point to which their last hopes

were directed. The legionaries who had mutinied against Cassius Longinus

were still either unsatisfied with their treatment under the commander

who had superseded him, or fearful of their general’s vengeance when

a fitting opportunity should arrive. It was from Cæsar’s own soldiers

that the invitation had gone forth to the republican chiefs to renew

the struggle on the soil of Spain. The spirit of the old commonwealth

still survived in many of the towns of Bætica; promises of support were

freely given; but the remnant of the African armament was contemptible

both in numbers and ability. Of all the haughty nobles who had thronged

the tent of Pompey at Luceria or Thessalonica, not one with a name

known to history remained in arms, except Labienus alone. He indeed had

succeeded in making his escape from Africa, in company with Varus; but

the insurgents had already placed themselves under the command of Scapula

and Aponius, officers of their own, nor would they suffer themselves to

be transferred from them to any other except the son of the great Pompey.

The extent to which the flame of insurrection had spread was probably

unknown at this time to Cæsar. He was impatient to reap at last the fruit

of so much bloodshed, to assume the post of honour he had won, and to

work out the principles and objects of so many years of anticipation. A

distant and contemptible outbreak might be subdued without meeting it in

person. Accordingly, C. Didius, an officer of no eminent reputation, was

sent with a naval and military force to the succour of Trebonius, whom,

however, he found already expelled from his government by the growing

force of the new movement.

Meanwhile Rome had sunk, during the conqueror’s absence, into a state

of torpid tranquillity. The universal conviction that the dictator’s

power was irresistible had quelled all further heavings of the spirit

of discontent. Dolabella had been gratified with a command in the late

campaign; while others, in whose fidelity and military skill he could

rely, had been left behind to overawe disaffection. The most illustrious

of the nobility having now no occasion to remain at Rome for the sake of

paying court to a jealous ruler, had retired generally to their country

seats; but Cicero seems to have feared giving occasion for distrust if he

withdrew himself from the broad eye of public observation. He occupied

himself, however, in his philosophical studies, and could rejoice that

he had never, like so many of his contemporaries when plunging into the

excitements of political life, abandoned the literary pursuits common to

them in youth. While he still regarded the contest in Africa with the

sentiments of a true republican, he confessed with a sigh that though the

one cause was assuredly the more just, yet the victory of either would

be equally disastrous. He probably held aloof from the proceedings of

the servile senate, which occupied itself during the months of Cæsar’s

absence in devising new honours for his acceptance. First of all it

decreed the religious ceremony of a thanksgiving of forty days, being

twice the term to which the compliance of popular gratitude had ever

previously extended, and it was by the length of the observance that

the honour was estimated. Next it appointed that the victor’s triumphal

car should be drawn by horses of white, the sacred colour, and that

the number of his attendant lictors should be doubled. He was to be

requested to undertake the office of censor for three years, under a new

title, which should not remind the citizens too closely of the times of

republican liberty, that of _præfectus morum_, or regulator of manners.

The changes which the revolutionary storm had effected in the condition

of so many of the citizens justified a resort to the old constitutional

resource for purging the senate of scandalous or impoverished members,

and infusing new blood into its veins.

The most substantial of all these tributes to Cæsar’s ascendency was the

decree by which he was appointed dictator for a period of ten years; for

thus the initiative of legal measures was united in his hands with the

command of the legions both at home and abroad. Other specious honours,

in the taste of the times, were accumulated upon him. His chair was to

be placed between those of the consuls in the assembly of the senate; he

was to preside and give the signal in the games of the circus; and his

figure in ivory was to be borne in procession among the images of the

gods, and laid up in the Capitol, opposite the seat of Jupiter himself.

A statue was to be erected to him in bronze, standing upon a globe, with

the inscription, “Cæsar the demi-god.” His name was to be engraved on

the entablature of the Capitol, in the place of that of Catulus, its

true restorer. The historian who recounts these honours assures us that

many others besides these were offered; he has only omitted to specify

them because Cæsar did not think fit to accept them. It is difficult

to imagine to what lower depth of obsequiousness the senate could have

descended, or what higher dignities the conqueror would have rejected.

CÆSAR’S TRIUMPHS

The time had now arrived for the celebration of the Gallic triumph, which

had been so long postponed. In the interval, the imperator’s victories

had been multiplied, and the ranks of his veterans had been recruited

by fresh enlistments; so that every soldier who had shared in his later

perils and successes demanded the reward of participating in his honours.

Cæsar claimed not one, but four triumphs: the first, for his conquest of

the Gauls; the second for his defeat of Ptolemy; another, for his victory

over Pharnaces; and the last, for the overthrow of Juba. But he carefully

avoided all reference to what were in reality the most brilliant of his

achievements. In Spain and Thessaly he had routed the disciplined legions

of his own countrymen; but their defeat brought no accession of honour

or territory to the republic. The glory it reflected on the victor was

dubious and barren. The four triumphs were celebrated, with intervals of

a few days between each, that the interests of the public might not pall

with satiety. The first procession formed in the Campus Martius, outside

the walls of the city. It defiled through the triumphal gate at the foot

of the Capitoline Hill, and crossed the deep hollow of the Velabrum

and Forum Boarium, on its way to the Circus Maximus, which occupied

the valley between the Palatine and Aventine. In passing through the

Velabrum, the chariot in which the imperator stood, happened to break

down; a mischance which so affected him that he never afterwards, it is

said, ascended a vehicle without repeating a charm.

The long procession wound round the base of the Palatine, skirting the

Aventine and Cælian hills, to the point where the arch of Constantine now

stands. There it began the ascent of the gentle slope which separates

the basin of the Colosseum from that of the Roman Forum. It followed

the same track which now leads under the arch of Titus, paved at this

day with solid masses of hewn stone, which may possibly have re-echoed

to the tramp of Cæsar’s legions. Inclining a little to the right at the

point where it gained the summit of the ridge and looked down upon the

comitium and rostra, in the direction of the Capitol, it passed before

the spot where the temple of Julius was afterwards built; thence it

skirted the right side of the Forum, under the arch of Fabius, till it

reached a point just beyond the existing arch of Severus, where the two

roads branched off, the one to the Capitoline temple, the other to the

Mamertine prison. Here it was that Cæsar took the route of triumph to the

left, while Vercingetorix was led away to the right, and strangled in the

subterranean dungeon. The Gallic hero doubtless met with firmness and

dignity the fate to which he had so long been doomed, while his conqueror

was exhibiting a melancholy spectacle of human infirmity, crawling up

the steps of the Capitol on his knees, to avert, by an act of childish

humiliation, the wrath of the avenging Nemesis. The next instance of

similar degradation recorded is that of the emperor Claudius, who being

corpulent and clumsy performed the ungraceful feat with the support of an

arm on either side. The practice was probably of no unusual occurrence,

and was deeply rooted, we may believe, in ancient and popular prejudices.

A remnant of it still exists, and may be witnessed by the curious, even

at the present day, on the steps of the Ara Cœli and at the Santa Scala

of the Lateran.

[Illustration: A SACRIFICATOR]

The days of triumph which succeeded passed over with uninterrupted good

fortune. The populace were gratified with the sight of the Egyptian

princess Arsinoe led as a captive at the conqueror’s wheels; but she was

spared the fate of the Gallic chieftain out of favour to her sister,

or perhaps out of pity to her sex. The son of the king of Numidia who

followed the triumphal car was also spared, and lived to receive back

his father’s crown from Augustus. Though Cæsar abstained from claiming

the title of a triumph over his countrymen, he did not scruple to parade

their effigies among the shows of the procession. The figures or pictures

of the vanquished chiefs were carried on litters, and represented the

manner of their deaths. Scipio was seen leaping desperately into the sea;

Cato plunging the sword into his own bowels; Juba and Petreius engaged

in mortal duel; Lentulus stabbed by the Egyptian assassin; Domitius

pierced perhaps in the back, in token of his flight. The figure of Pompey

alone was withheld for fear of the commiseration it might excite among

the people whose favourite he had so lately been. Nor, as it was, were

the spectators unmoved. Upon the unfeeling display of Roman defeat and

disaster they reflected with becoming sensibility. But the pictures of

Achillas and Pothinus were received with unmingled acclamations, and loud

was the cry of scorn at the exhibition of Pharnaces flying in confusion

from the field. After all, the most impressive part of the ceremony must

have been the appearance of the rude veterans whose long files closed

the procession. With what ignorant wonder must the children of Gaul and

Iberia, of Epirus and Africa, have gazed at the splendour of the city, of

which the fame resounded in their native cabins! What contempt must they

have felt for the unarmed multitudes grinning around them! How reckless

must they have been of the dignity of the consuls and senators, they

who claimed the license of shouting derisive songs in the ears of their

own commander! Little did they think that grave historians would sum up

their coarse camp jokes in evidence against the fame of their illustrious

leader; still less did they dream of the new power which the military

class was thenceforth to constitute in the state. Rome in fact was their

own; but it was a secret they were not yet to discover.

The satisfaction of his armed supporters, however, was the first

condition on which the supreme power of the dictator must henceforth

be maintained in the city. It was a matter, indeed, of hardly less

importance to secure the good humour of the urban population. While the

soldiers receive each a donative of twenty thousand sesterces, the claims

of the much larger multitude of the free citizens were not undervalued

severally at four hundred; especially as they received the additional

gratification of one year’s remission of house rent. It does not appear

how this indulgence differed from that for which Cælius and Dolabella had

raised their commotions; but the dictator had so strenuously resisted

every attempt to set aside the just claims of creditors on all previous

occasions, that it can hardly be doubted that in this case he gave the

landlords compensation from the public treasury. The mass of the citizens

was feasted at a magnificent banquet, at which the Chian and Falernian

wines, the choicest produce of Greece and Italy, flowed freely from the

hogshead, and towards which six thousand lampreys, the most exquisite

delicacy of the Roman epicure, were furnished by a single breeder.

The mighty multitude reclined before twenty-two thousand tables; each

table having its three couches, and each couch, we may suppose, its

three guests; so that the whole number feasted may have amounted to

nearly two hundred thousand. When Cæsar undertook the functions of his

censorship, the number of recipients of the public distributions of corn

was estimated at 320,000. Upon a scrutiny into their claims as genuine

and resident citizens, he was enabled to strike off as many as 150,000

from this list. Adding to the remainder the senators and knights, and

the few wealthy individuals who might have scorned to partake of a state

provision, the sum will correspond pretty accurately with the number of

the imperial guests as above computed.

The public shows with which these gratifications were accompanied were

carried out on a scale of greater magnificence than even those recently

exhibited by Pompey. There was nothing in which the magistrates of the

republic vied more ostentatiously with one another than in the number of

wild beasts and gladiators which they brought into the arena. The natural

taste of the Italian people for shows and mummery degenerated more and

more into an appetite for blood; but in this, as in every other respect,

it was Cæsar’s ambition to outdo his predecessors, and the extraordinary

ferocity and carnage of the exhibitions which he complacently witnessed

excited a shudder even in the brutal multitude. The combatants in the

games of the Circus were either professional gladiators, who sold their

services for a certain term of years, or captives taken in war, or

lastly public criminals. But Cæsar was, perhaps, the first to encourage

private citizens to make an exhibition of their skill and valour in these

mortal combats. He allowed several men of equestrian rank, and one the

son of a prætor, to demean themselves in the eyes of their countrymen

by this exposure to the public gaze. It was only when a senator named

Fulvius Setinus asked permission thus to prostitute his dignity, that the

dictator was at last roused to restrain the growing degradation.

If the people of Rome were shocked at the bloodshed which they were

invited to applaud, it seems that they were offended also at the vast

sums which were lavished on these ostentatious spectacles. They would

have preferred, perhaps, that the donative to themselves should have

been greater, and the soldiers even exhibited symptoms of discontent and

mutiny in consequence. No instance of Cæsar’s profuse expenditure excited

greater admiration than his stretching a silken awning over the heads of

the spectators in the Circus. This beautiful material was brought only

from the farthest extremity of India, and was extremely rare and precious

at Rome at that time. Three centuries later it was still so costly that a

Roman emperor forbade his wife the luxury of a dress of the finest silk

unmixed with a baser fabric. But a more permanent and worthy object of

imperial expenditure was the gorgeous Forum of which Cæsar had long since

laid the foundation with the spoils of his Gallic Wars. Between the old

Roman Forum and the foot of the Quirinal, he caused a large space to be

enclosed with rows of marble corridors, connecting in one suite halls of

justice, chambers of commerce, and arcades for public recreation. In the

centre was erected a temple to Venus the ancestress, the patroness for

whom Cæsar had woven a breastplate of British pearls, and whose name he

had used as his watchword on the days of his greatest victories. He now

completed the series of his triumphal shows by the dedication of this

favourite work. It remained for centuries a conspicuous monument of the

fame and magnificence of the first of the Cæsars. His successors were

proud to cluster new arches and columns by its side, and bestowed their

names upon the edifices they erected in connection with it. Finally,

Trajan cut through the elevated ridge which united the Capitoline with

the Quirinal, and impeded the further extension of the imperial forums.

He filled the hollow with a new range of buildings, occupying as much

ground as the united works of his predecessors in this quarter. The depth

of his excavation is indicated, it is said, by the height of the pillar

which bears his name.

THE LAST CAMPAIGN

[Sidenote: [46-45 B.C.]]

Our review of the dictator’s proceedings in the discharge of his civil

functions must be postponed, but only for a moment, to relate the short

episode of his last military exploit. The despatches of his lieutenants

in Spain represented that province as rapidly falling into the hands

of the republican faction. Varus and Labienus had escaped from Africa,

and joined the standard under which Scapula marshalled the disaffected

legions in Spain. Cneius Pompeius had also issued from his retreat in

the Balearic Isles, and as soon as he appeared in their camp every chief

of the oligarchy waived his own pretensions to the command in deference

to the man who represented the fame and fortunes of their late leader.

Yet Scapula had the confidence of the soldiers, Labienus was an officer

of tried ability and reputation, and Varus had at least held the

highest military commands, while Cneius himself was personally unknown

to the legions in Spain, and his only achievement in war had been a

dashing naval exploit. So cowed by its repeated reverses was the spirit

of the old Roman party, which had revived for a moment in Africa with

vain exultation at finding itself relieved from the ascendency of its

own military champion. Cneius, on his part, seems to have regarded the

renewed contest in the light of a private quarrel. His war-cry was not

“Rome,” “Liberty,” or “The Senate,” but “Pietas,” “Filial Duty.”

The disaffection among Cæsar’s soldiers had become widely spread; a

large body of them had enrolled themselves under their new leaders;

their numbers had been augmented by provincial enlistments; even slaves

had been drafted into the ranks; while the cities and states of the

peninsula lent their aid more or less openly to the cause. It was not

in the remoter parts of the province or among the half-subdued native

principalities, but in the centre of Roman influence and civilisation,

in Corduba itself, that the standard of the adventurers was unfurled.

Cæsar had completed the ceremonies of his quadruple triumph, and was

deeply engaged in the arduous task of legislation for the new system of

government which he had undertaken to raise, when he found it necessary

to postpone every other occupation to meet his enemies once more in arms.

So uncertain and tedious was the navigation of those days that he may

have chosen the land route across the Alps and Pyrenees, for the sake of

reaching his destination with greater speed.[123]

The details of the campaign into which he immediately plunged are

given, but very obscurely, in the last of the series of contemporary

memoirs which have hitherto been our guides throughout the military

history of the period. In point of composition it betrays less literary

accomplishment than any of its kindred works. The rude soldier who

seems to have been its author had no hesitation in recording in their

undisguised enormity the cruelties which disgraced the conduct of both

parties. Cæsar’s character for humanity suffers more in this than in

any other contemporary narrative of his actions. The campaign was,

indeed, a series of butcheries on either side, but Cneius was, perhaps,

the most savagely ferocious of all the captains of the civil wars. The

scene of the last act of Roman liberty was laid in the valley of the

Guadalquivir and the defiles of the Sierra de Tolar. After a variety

of desultory movements, of which we obtain from the narrative only an

indistinct notion, we find the rival armies at last drawn up in hostile

array on the field of Munda. Cæsar was this time superior in numbers, and

especially in cavalry; but the enemy was well posted, and fought well:

never, it is said, was the great conqueror brought so near to defeat and

destruction.[b]

“When the armies were going to close, Cæsar, seeing his men go on but

coldly and seem to be afraid, invoked all the gods, beseeching them with

hands lifted up to heaven, not to let the lustre of so many glorious

actions be darkened in one day, and running through the ranks, encouraged

his soldiers, taking off his head-piece that he might be better known.

But do what he could, he could not raise their spirits, till snatching a

buckler out of a soldier’s hand, he said to the tribunes who were about

him, ‘This shall be the last day of my life, and of your engagement in

the war.’ And at the same time made furiously towards the enemy; he had

scarce advanced ten feet but he had above two hundred darts thrown at

him, some of which he avoided by bending his body, and others received on

his buckler, when the tribunes ran with emulation to get about him, and

the whole army thereupon charging with all their fury, they fought all

day with divers advantage, and at length towards the evening the victory

fell to Cæsar, and it is reported that hereupon he was heard to say these

words, ‘that he had often fought for victory, but that now he had fought

for life.’

“After the defeat, Pompeius’ men flying into Corduba, Cæsar, to prevent

their escape thither, lest they should rally and renew the fight,

caused the place to be invested by the army, where the soldiers being

so tired that they could not work in the circumvallation, heaped up

together the bodies and armour of the slain, which they kept piled up

with their javelins stuck into the ground, and lay all night under that

kind of rampire. Next morning the city was taken. Of Pompeius’ captains,

Scapula setting up on a pile of wood burned himself; the heads of Varus,

Labienus, and other persons of quality were brought to Cæsar. As for

Pompeius, he fled from the battle with a hundred and fifty horse, bending

his course towards Carteia where his fleet lay; he entered the port in

a litter, and in the habit of a private man. But seeing the seamen had

likewise lost all hopes, he threw himself in a little boat, in which as

he was going out to sea, his foot tangling in the cordage, one of his

people going to cut the rope, by mischance cut his heel, so that to cure

his wound he was forced to go ashore at a small village, where hearing

that Cæsar’s horsemen were coming, he took his flight through a country

covered with thorns and briers, which added to his wound, so that being

tired and sitting down at last under a tree, he was found by those who

gave him chase, and slain, generously defending himself; his head was

carried to Cæsar, who caused it to be buried. Thus [says Appian] was

this war ended by one only fight and contrary to the opinion of all the

world.”[g]

Of all the leaders of the senatorial party, Sextus Pompeius was now the

only survivor. He had made his escape from the field of Munda, and had an

asylum in the wildest districts of the Hither Province. He had nothing to

hope from the clemency of the conqueror, who had shown unusual bitterness

against his family by the confiscation of their patrimonial estates, and

was now preparing to celebrate his triumph over them as foreigners and

enemies of the state. Thus driven to despair, he infused new spirit into

the predatory habits among the tribes among whom he had taken refuge, and

continued to defy the power of the provincial authorities. Cæsar occupied

himself for some months in reconstituting the government of Spain, taking

precautions for the entire subjugation of the party which had shown

such vitality in that quarter. The battle of Munda was fought on the

seventeenth of March, but the dictator was not at liberty to return to

Italy till September, after an absence of ten months.

The hostile attitude of the last of the Pompeians in Spain was not the

only exception to the tranquillity which prevailed generally throughout

the empire. In Gaul the Bellovaci had risen in arms; but this movement

was expeditiously repressed by Decimus Brutus, the proconsul of the

newly conquered province. In the extreme East, however, the republican

party still continued to make head, under the leadership of Cæcilius

Bassus. Their champion was an obscure knight, and their forces were

insignificant, consisting principally of two legions which Bassus had

seduced from their allegiance to Sextus Cæsar, the commander to whose

care Syria had been entrusted by his kinsman. But the proximity of the

Parthians, ever on the watch for an opportunity to wound the sides of

their great rivals, rendered any movement in this quarter formidable.

Sextus Cæsar was murdered by his soldiers, and Bassus took possession of

the city of Apamea, which, with the assistance of the national enemies,

he continued to keep against the petty attempts which were made to

dislodge him. The dictator kept his eye upon him, and already meditated

his destruction; but for the present he was content to leave his temerity

unpunished, while he applied himself to the consolidation of his power by

bold and comprehensive legislation at home.[b]

THE LAST TRIUMPH

[Sidenote: [45 B.C.]]

On the 13th of September, 45, the dictator appeared once more at the

gates of Rome, but he did not triumph till the commencement of October.

His victory was represented as gained over the Iberians; the miserable

outcasts whom Cneius had banded together were all confounded together

under the common title of strangers and enemies. Two of the dictator’s

lieutenants, Fabius, and Pedius who was also his kinsman, were allowed

the honour of separate triumphs. These ceremonies were followed as usual

with games and festivals, which kept the populace in a fever of delight

and admiration. They had complained that among the numerous spectacles

offered to their view each citizen could witness only a portion, while to

the foreigners who flocked to this great feast of nations, the dramatic

entertainments had been unintelligible. The games were now multiplied in

various quarters of the city, while plays were represented in different

languages for the benefit of every people. The subjects of the empire had

entered Rome as conquerors in Cæsar’s train, and thus he inaugurated the

union of the capital with the provinces. Kings and commonwealths sent

their ambassadors to this mighty congress of nations. Among them were

the Moors and the Numidians, the Gauls and the Iberians, the Britons and

the Armenians, the Germans and the Syrians. The Jews, insulted by Pompey

and rifled by Crassus, offered their willing homage to the champion who

alone of all the Romans had spoken to them in the language of kindliness

and respect. Cleopatra the queen of Egypt came, her crown in her hand,

offering her treasures and her favours to her admirer and preserver. All

in turn had trembled at the official caprices of the Roman knights, and

Cæsar could afford them perhaps no sweeter revenge, nor represent to them

more vividly the extent of his power, than in degrading before their

faces these petty tyrants of the provinces. He compelled one of them,

named Laberius, who was also a dramatic composer, to enact one of his

own comic pieces, that is, to dance and sing upon the stage before the

concourse of citizens and strangers. “Alas!” said the wretched man in his

prologue, “after sixty years of honour I have left my house a knight, to

return to it a mime. I have lived one day too long.” Cæsar restored to

him the golden ring of knighthood, forfeited by this base but compulsory

compliance. He presented him also with a large sum of money, to show

perhaps more completely the prostration of his order.

Such trifling persecutions, whether personal or political in their

objects, are undoubtedly pitiable enough. But it is Cæsar’s glory that

his arm fell heavily upon none of his fellow-citizens. The nephew of

Marius forgot the banishment of his uncle, the ruins of Carthage, and

the marshes of Minturnæ; the avenger of the Sullan revolution scorned

to retaliate the proscriptions; the advocate of Cethegus and Lentulus

refrained from demanding blood for blood. It is worth remarking that

Cicero, the most humane perhaps of his own party, the most moderate in

sentiments, the fairest estimater of men and measures, could hardly

persuade himself of the possibility of Cæsar abstaining from massacre.

Such was the wise man’s reading of the history of his countrymen; and

when at last he found that the conqueror meditated no such use of his

victory, his heart, we fear, still remained untouched, and he never,

perhaps, renounced the secret hope that Cæsar’s opponents would prove

less merciful than himself.

Nor was the conqueror’s clemency confined to sparing the lives of

his opponents. He refrained from confiscation which had been wont to

accompany the edicts of his predecessors. The wealth indeed which was

poured into Rome from the tribute of so many new subjects, and the

plunder of so many temples, rendered it more easy to practise this

unusual liberality. It was ungenerous perhaps to make the estates of

his great rival the chief exception to this rule of moderation. But

Cæsar intended to brand as rebels to constituted authority the men who

renewed the strife after Thapsus, and this confiscation was meant, not

as an insult to the dead, but as a punishment of the living opponent.

The name of the Great Pompey had already passed into the shrine of

history, and the victor was proud of closing the fasti of the republic

with so illustrious a title. Far from approving the precipitation of his

flatterers in removing the statues of Pompey and Sulla, he caused them to

be restored to their places in front of the rostra, among the effigies

of the noblest champions of the free state. Towards the institutions

of the commonwealth he evinced a similar spirit of deference. He

sought no new forms under which to develop his new policy. Sulla had

attempted to revive the aristocratic spirit of the ancient constitution

by overthrowing the existing framework of the laws; but the popular

dictator, in laying the foundation of a more extensive revolution,

studied to preserve it intact. While making himself an autocrat in every

essential exercise of power, he maintained, at least in outward seeming,

all the institutions most opposed to autocracy, the senate, the comitia,

and the magistracies. But he had long before said that the republic was

no more than a shadow, and these very institutions had long been merely

the instruments by which tyrants had worked out the ends of their selfish

ambition.

Cæsar now was fully aware that he could sway the Roman world unchecked by

the interference of a senate, two-thirds of which perhaps were nominees

of his own. Under the sanction of an organic law he had raised the number

of the assembly to nine hundred, thus degrading the honour by making it

cheap; and he still more degraded it in the eyes of the proudest of the

citizens by pouring into it his allies from the provinces, his soldiers,

and even, if we may believe their bitter sarcasms, the captives who had

just followed his car of triumph. The Romans exercised their wits on

these upstart strangers losing themselves amidst the forests of columns

which thronged the public places, and placards were posted recommending

no good citizen to guide them to the senate house. This servile council,

with less respect for appearances than its chief, would have given him

the right of nominating to all curule and plebeian offices, to the

entire abrogation of the electoral prerogatives of the people. But Cæsar

declined to destroy the last shadow of liberty, assured that no man would

venture to sue for a magistracy without his consent. He contented himself

with recommending certain candidates to the suffrages of the people, and

these recommendations were equivalent to commands. Moreover the senate

had imposed upon the elected the obligation to swear before entering on

their office, that they would undertake nothing against the acts of the

dictator, for every act of his was invested with the force of law. The

consuls, prætors, and other officers thus continued to exercise their

ordinary functions under the dictator’s superintendence; the prætors

were increased in number, while the consuls, though never exceeding two

at the same time, were rapidly supplanted, sometimes month by month,

by fresh aspirants whom it was expedient to gratify. As the avowed

champion of the people Cæsar retained the appropriate distinction of the

tribunitian power, which also rendered his person inviolable;[124] while

both the senators and the knights offered to surround him with a guard of

honour of their own members to secure this inviolability by a stronger

instrument than the law. To the reality of power he added its outward

signs. In the senate, the theatre, the circus, and the hall of justice he

might seat himself on his golden chair in a robe of regal magnificence,

while his effigy was impressed upon the public coinage.[125] Apart from

the title of king there is no outward symbol of royalty more appropriate

than that of the hereditary transmission of offices and distinctions. The

imperium, or military supremacy, which had been granted to Cæsar for his

life, was rendered transmissible to his children, and with it the august

distinction of the sovereign pontificate.

In fine, the dictatorship for life and the consulship for five years,

with the right of drawing at pleasure upon the public treasury, secured

to Cæsar the executive power of the state; the imperium gave him the

command of its forces; the tribunate invested him with a veto upon its

legislation. As prince, or first man of the senate, he guided the debates

of that assembly; as controller of manners even its personal composition

depended upon his will. As chief pontiff he interpreted the religion of

the state, and made omens and auguries declare themselves at his bidding.

Thus the finances, the army, the religious system, the executive with a

portion of the judicial power, and indirectly almost the whole functions

of the legislature were combined in the hands of the autocrat of the

Roman commonwealth. Nevertheless he had assumed no title inconsistent

with the principles of the republic, and the precedents of constitutional

history.

CÆSAR’S REFORMS

[Sidenote: [46-44 B.C.]]

What then were the objects to which Cæsar proposed to direct this

enormous accumulation of powers? His cherished scheme for the

amalgamation of the various elements of the empire was necessarily slow

in progress. He did not seek to precipitate it by violent measures.[c]

From his last triumph to his death was somewhat more than five months

(October, 45 B.C.-March, 44 B.C.): from his quadruple triumph to the

Spanish campaign was little more than four months (June-September, 46

B.C.). Into these two brief periods were compressed most of the laws

which bear his name, and of which we will now give a brief account. The

evils which he endeavoured to remedy were of old standing. His long

residence at Rome, and busy engagement in all political matters from

early youth to the close of his consulship, made him familiar with every

sore place and with all the proposed remedies. His own clear judgment,

his habits of rapid decision, and the unlimited power which he held, made

it easier for him to legislate than for others to advise.

The long wars, and the liberality with which he had rewarded his soldiers

and the people at his triumphs, had reduced the treasury to a low ebb. He

began by revising the register of citizens, principally for the purpose

of abridging the list of those who were receiving monthly donations of

grain from the treasury. Numbers of foreigners had been irregularly

placed on the list, and he was able to reduce the list of state paupers

resident in or near Rome from 320,000 to less than half that number. The

treasury felt an immediate and a permanent relief.

But though, for this purpose, Cæsar made severe distinctions between

Roman citizens and the foreign subjects of the republic, no ruler

ever showed himself so much alive to the claims of all classes of her

subjects. Other popular leaders had advocated the cause of the Italians,

and all free people of the peninsula had in the last thirty years been

made Romans: but no one had as yet shown interest in the claims of the

provincial subjects of Rome, except Sertorius, and his object was rather

a transference of power from Italians to Spaniards, than an incorporation

of Spain with Italy. Cæsar was the first acknowledged ruler of the Roman

state who extended his view beyond the politics of the city and took a

really imperial survey of the vast dominions subject to her sway. Towards

those who were at war with Rome he was as relentless as the sternest

Roman of them all; but no one so well as he knew how “to spare the

submissive”; hardly any one except himself felt pleasure in sparing. All

the cities of Transpadane Gaul, already Latin, were raised to the Roman

franchise. The same high privilege was bestowed on many communities of

Transalpine Gaul and Spain. The Gallic legion which he had raised, called

_Alauda_ from the lark which was the emblem on their arms, was rewarded

for its services by the same gift. All scientific men, of whatever

origin, were to be allowed to claim the Roman franchise. After his death

a plan was found among his papers for raising the Sicilian communities to

the rank of Latin citizens.

The imperial character of the great dictator’s government is strongly

shown by his unfulfilled projects. Among these was the draining of the

Pontine marshes, the opening of lakes Lucrinus and Avernus to form a

harbour, a complete survey and map of the whole empire--plans afterwards

executed by Agrippa, the minister of Augustus. Another and more memorable

design was that of a code of laws embodying and organising the scattered

judgments and precedents which at that time regulated the courts. It was

several centuries before this great work was accomplished, by which Roman

law became the law of civilised Europe.

The liberal tendency of the dictator’s mind was shown by the manner in

which he supplied the great gaps which the Civil War had made in the

benches of the senate. Of late years the number of that assembly had been

increased from its original three hundred.[126] Cicero on one occasion

mentions 415 members taking part in the votes, and many of course were

absent. But Cæsar raised it to nine hundred, thus greatly exceeding the

largest number that had ever been counted in its ranks. Many of the new

senators were fortunate soldiers who had served him well. In raising such

men to senatorial rank he followed the example of Sulla. Many also were

enfranchised citizens of the towns of Cisalpine Gaul. The old citizens

were indignant at this invasion of barbarians. “The Gauls,” said one wit,

“had exchanged the trews [trousers] for the toga, and had followed the

conqueror’s triumphal car into the senate.” “It were a good deed,” said

another, “if no one would show the new senators the way to the house.”

The curule offices, however, were still conferred on men of Italian

birth. The first foreigner who reached the consulship was Balbus, a

Spaniard of Gades, the friend of Cæsar; this was four years after the

dictator’s death.

To revive a military population in Italy was not so much the object of

Cæsar as that of former leaders of the people. His veterans received

few assignments of land in Italy. The principal settlements by which

he enriched them were in the provinces. Corinth and Carthage were made

military colonies, and regained somewhat of their ancient splendour and

renown.

He endeavoured to restore the wasted population of Italy by more peaceful

methods. The marriage tie, which had become exceedingly lax in these

profligate times, was encouraged by somewhat singular means. A married

matron was allowed to use more ornaments and more costly carriages than

the sumptuary laws of Rome permitted to women generally. A married man

who had three children born in lawful wedlock at Rome, or four born in

Italy, or five born in the provinces, enjoyed freedom from certain duties.

The great abuse of slave labour was difficult to correct. It was

attempted to apply remedies familiar to despotic governments. An

ordinance was issued that no citizens between twenty and forty years of

age should be absent from Italy for more than three years. An ancient

enactment was revived that on all estates at least one-third of the

labourers should be free men. No doubt these measures were of little

effect.[d]

Viewing the dominions over which he presided as a whole, endowed, or

speedily to be endowed with a general equality of rights, and Rome

herself no longer as an isolated municipium and a mistress-city, but the

centre and capital of the Roman world, he proceeded to lay the groundwork

of a comprehensive scheme of universal legislation. His first care was

to develop the material unity of the vast regions before him, by an

elaborate survey of their local features. A commission of geographers and

mathematicians was appointed, as we have just said, to construct the map

of the Roman Empire, a work so novel and so full of detail, as to require

the labour, as it afterwards proved, of no less than thirty-two years.

Another effort, not less gigantic, was required to impress a moral unity

upon this vast machine. Cæsar prepared to collect and combine in a single

code the fragments of Roman law, dispersed in thousands of precedents,

the edicts of the prætors, the replies of the learned, the decisions of

pontiffs, and the traditions of patrician houses. Such a mighty work

had already been contemplated by Cicero, as the hopeless vision of the

philanthropist and philosopher; but Cæsar’s practical sagacity saw that

it not only ought to be done, but could be done, and doubtless had he

but lived ten or twenty years longer, he would have anticipated by six

centuries the glory of the imperial legislator Justinian.

Another work of equal utility but fortunately of much smaller compass

was the reformation of the calendar, and this it was given to the great

Julius to effect, and to call after his own name. The Roman year, even

before the time of Cæsar, ought to have equalled on the average 365

days and six hours; so near had the astronomers of the period of Numa

already arrived to the real length of the earth’s revolution round the

sun. This year had been calculated on a basis of 354 days, with the

intercalation every second year of a month of twenty-two and twenty-three

days alternately; but another day had been added to the 354 to make an

odd or fortunate number, and to compensate for this superfluous insertion

the number of intercalations was proportionally diminished by a very

intricate process. The simplicity of the original arrangement being thus

violated, great carelessness had soon prevailed in making the requisite

corrections. In course of time the pontiffs, to whose superior skill

the guardianship of the calendar had been entrusted, had shrouded their

science in a veil of religious mystery, and turned it to political or

private ends. They commanded the intercalation of a month arbitrarily,

when it suited them to favour a partisan who desired the extension of

his year of office, or the postponement of the day on which his debts

should become due. They abstained from the requisite insertion at the

instance of some provincial governor, who was anxious to hasten his

return to the enjoyments of the capital. This control over the length

of the civil year, as well as the power of proclaiming the days on

which business might or might not be transacted, had become an engine

of state in the hands of the oligarchical government, with which the

pontiffs were for the most part politically connected. The grievance had

lately become intolerable. In the distracted state of public affairs

and amidst conflicting personal interests, the pontiffs had abstained

from intercalating since the year 52, and had even then left the civil

calendar some weeks in advance of the real time. Since then each year

had reckoned only 355 days, and the civil equinox had got eighty days

in advance of the astronomical. The consuls accordingly, who entered on

their office the 1st of January, 47, really commenced their functions

on the 13th of October. The confusion hence resulting may be easily

imagined. The Roman seasons were marked by appropriate festivals assigned

to certain fixed days, and associated with the religious worship of the

people. At the period of harvest and of vintage, for instance, seasonable

offerings were to be made, which it was no longer possible to offer on

the days specifically assigned for them. The husbandman rejected the use

of the calendar altogether, and depended on his own rude observations of

the rising and setting of the constellations.

Cæsar had acquired a competent knowledge of astronomy, in which his

duties as chief of the pontiffs gave him a particular interest. He

composed himself a treatise on the subject, which had long retained

its value as a technical exposition. With the help of the astronomer

Sosigenes, he recurred again to the simple calculations of Numa, and was

content to disregard the discrepancy, which he conceived perhaps with

Hipparchus to be more trifling than it really is, between the length

thus assigned to the year and the true period of the earth’s revolution.

In the course of centuries this error has grown into importance, and

in the year A.D. 1582, when the Julian calendar was corrected by Pope

Gregory XIII, the civil year had got forward no less than ten days. The

requisite correction was not made, as is well known, in England till

the middle of the eighteenth century. The basis of Cæsar’s reform was

that the commencement of the new era should coincide with the first new

moon after the shortest day. In order to make the year 46 thus begin,

ninety days required to be added to the current year. In the first place

an intercalary month of twenty-three days was inserted between the

twenty-third and twenty-fourth of February, and at the end of November

two new months were added comprehending sixty days, together with a

supplemental addition of seven more. The period which was marked by this

series of alterations received vulgarly the appellation of “the year

of confusion”; but “the last year of confusion,” it has been justly

remarked, would be its more appropriate title.

Besides these noble efforts of social organisation, Cæsar, like almost

every other great man of his nation, had an intense passion for material

construction. He had already distinguished himself by the Forum, which he

called by his own name in the heart of the city; a work which was loudly

demanded on account of the inconvenient narrowness of the spot on which

the public business of the republic had been transacted from the period

of its infancy. But among the honours now showered upon him was one which

had been granted only once or twice before to conquerors who had furthest

enlarged the limits of the empire, and which, it has been remarked, was

alone wanting to complete the “good fortune” of Sulla. This was the

permission to extend the _pomœrium_, the space left open about the walls

of the city, partly within and partly without them, originally perhaps

for the convenience of defence; but which was consecrated by solemn

ceremonies, and traversed by religious processions. Cæsar proposed, it

is said, to remove this line, and with it probably the walls themselves,

so as to embrace the Campus Martius, which he would have enlarged by

turning the Tiber westward with a bold sweep from the Milvian to the

Vatican bridge. This grand project was never destined to be accomplished,

and though in later times the emperor Augustus and others were allowed

to extend the pomœrium, the walls of Rome were not removed beyond the

lines traced by Servius till the time of Aurelian, three centuries after

Cæsar. Nor was the dictator more fortunate in completing the many other

works of public interest and utility which he was already meditating. He

planned, it is said, the emptying of the lake Fucinus, the draining of

the Pomptine marshes, the construction of a canal from Rome to Tarracina,

of a new road across the Apennines, and of a magnificent harbour at

Ostia, the erection of a superb temple to Mars, and the cutting of the

Isthmus of Corinth. Of all these designs the temple and the harbour were

alone accomplished by his successor; it is probable that Cæsar himself

had commenced them. [Under his patronage the first public library was

opened at Rome, and for the transaction of public business he erected the

magnificent building called the Basilica Julia.]

CÆSAR’S LIFE IN ROME

Such were the subjects of meditation which engrossed Cæsar’s mind

during the days and nights he devoted to public affairs. But he had

also his hours of recreation, and he shone in private life among the

most cultivated men of his time, the most refined in habits, the most

fascinating in manners.

There is no feature of Roman life perhaps which we can regard with so

much satisfaction as the tone of habitual intercourse among public

men at this period. The daily conflicts at the bar or in the Forum to

which they were trained, would have only embittered their feelings

towards one another, had they not been accompanied by the humanising

influence of social discussion on topics of literature and philosophy.

The combination of these two habits seems indeed to form the best

discipline of society, imparting to it earnestness without violence,

and a masculine courtesy far removed from servility and adulation. The

records of Roman debate present us with hardly a single scene of personal

altercation, while the private reunions of the most eminent statesmen

are described to us as full of modest dignity and kindly forbearance. To

this pleasing result every school of philosophy contributed; but none

of them perhaps studied so well as the Epicurean the science of making

society agreeable. To this school both Cæsar himself and most of his

personal friends professed their adherence. The circle of his intimates

comprised: Cornelius Balbus, an acute man of business; Asinius Pollio,

a devoted student; A. Hirtius, who like his master both fought, wrote,

and talked well; C. Oppius, full of gentleness and affection; C. Matius,

thoughtful, generous, and disinterested. To these may be added Vibius

Pansa, a lounger and a good liver, yet neither incapable of office, nor

inexperienced in action. Antony, the gayest of boon companions, has

already been mentioned; but under the garb of good fellowship, he hardly

concealed the most intense selfishness, and of all Cæsar’s friends he

alone stands open to the suspicion of intriguing against the life of his

patron. Among these men and others of similar stamp Cæsar unbent from the

cares of empire, and often abandoned himself without restraint to the

enjoyments of festive mirth. With little wit of his own he was amused

by the witticisms of others, even when directed against himself, and

treasured up every caustic remark which fell from the lips of Cicero,

whose patriotism, relieved from the fear of impending proscription,

now exhaled itself in malicious pleasantries against the policy of the

dictator. At table indeed, surrounded by companions addicted to the

grossest self-indulgence, Cæsar was distinguished for his moderation.

Cato had said of him long before, that of all the revolutionists of

the day he alone had come sober to the task of destruction. But his

amours were numerous, and their character peculiarly scandalous; for his

countrymen still professed to regard the corruption of a Roman matron as

a public wrong, while his attachment to a foreigner, such as Cleopatra,

was denounced as a flagrant violation of religious and social principles.

In religion the Epicureans were sceptics, and Cæsar went farther and

openly professed his unbelief. The supreme pontiff of the commonwealth,

the head of the college whence issued the decrees which declared the

will of the gods, as inferred from the signs of the heavens, the flight

of birds, and the entrails of victims, he made no scruple in asserting

before the assembled fathers that the dogma of a future state, the

foundation of all religion, was a vain chimera. Nor did he hesitate to

defy the omens which the priests were especially appointed to observe. He

gave battle at Munda in despite of the most adverse auspices, when the

sacrifices assured him that no heart was found in the victim. “I will

have better omens,” he said, “when I choose.” Yet Cæsar, freethinker as

he was, could not escape the general thraldom of superstition. We have

seen him crawling on his knees up the steps of the temple to appease

an indignant Nemesis. Before the battle of Pharsalia he addressed a

prayer to the gods whom he denied in the senate, and derided among

his associates. He appealed to the omens before passing the Rubicon.

He carried about with him in Africa a certain Cornelius, a man of no

personal distinction, but whose name might be deemed auspicious on the

battlefields of Scipio and Sulla.

The queen of Egypt had followed her august admirer to Italy, and

scrupling perhaps to exhibit her publicly in the city, he had installed

her in his house and gardens on the other side of the river.[127] There

she had her levees for the reception of the noblest Romans, and her

blandishments were not perhaps ineffectual in soothing the asperity of

their resentments. Cicero himself condescended to solicit an interview

with her. She rewarded him with the promise of some Greek volumes from

Alexandria, rendered perhaps doubly precious by the recent conflagration.

But the populace were shocked at the report that Cæsar meditated raising

this barbarian mistress to the dignity of a Roman wife. He was married

indeed already to the noble daughter of Calpurnius Piso; but divorce was

easy, and might be resorted to without public scandal; Cicero himself

had lately dismissed Terentia for alleged incompatibility of temper, and

allied himself in her place with a youthful heiress. Besides, one of

his creatures was prepared, it was said, with a measure to remove all

restrictions upon the dictator’s passions, and allow him to marry as many

wives as he pleased, of whatever race or station.

[Illustration: ROMAN BRAZIER]

Though arrived, as we have seen, at the summit of real power, it was

manifest that Cæsar still chafed under the restraints imposed upon him

by opinion and prejudice. His firm and well-poised mind seems at last

to have lost its equilibrium, and given way to fretful impatience, and

a capricious longing for some unattainable object. The Roman nobles,

accustomed to the most perfect equality in their intercourse with one

another, were mortified at the haughtiness assumed by the chief of

the republic, surrounded by a crowd of flatterers through whom the

independent patrician could with difficulty force his way.

Once when the senators came in a body to communicate to him their decrees

in his honour, he omitted to rise from his seat to receive them. Balbus,

it was said, the upstart foreigner, had plucked him by the sleeve and

bade him remember that he was their master. It was reported that he had

called Sulla a fool for resigning the dictatorship. But while the lines

of his domestic policy were yet hardly laid, and every institution in

Rome still demanded the pressure of his moulding hand, Cæsar himself was

dreaming of foreign conquests, and sighing for his accustomed place at

the head of his legions. The disaster of Carrhæ, yet unavenged, might

furnish a pretext for war, and the influence of Mithridates, it might

be remembered, had extended from the Caspian and the Euxine to the head

of the Adriatic. He conceived, we are assured, the gigantic project

of first crushing the Parthians, and then returning across the Tanaïs

and Borysthenes, subduing the barbarians between the Caucasus and the

Carpathian Mountains, and assailing the Germans in the rear. Cleopatra,

who felt herself more secure of her admirer in the provinces than in

Rome, would doubtless lend her influence to urge him on. The republicans

in the city were not perhaps less anxious to remove him to a distance,

and launch him on a long and dangerous enterprise. At the close of the

year 45 he directed his legions to cross the Adriatic, and assemble

in Illyricum, there to await his own speedy arrival. He contemplated

an absence of considerable duration. He provided beforehand for the

succession of consuls and prætors for the two following years. On the

1st of January, 44, he entered upon his fifth consulship, in which

he associated himself with Antony. At the same time he obtained the

designation of Hirtius and Pansa for 43, of Decimus Brutus and Munatius

Plancus for 42. The prætors appointed for the year 44 were sixteen in

number, and among them were M. Brutus and Cassius.

EVENTS LEADING TO THE CONSPIRACY

[Sidenote: [45-44 B.C.]]

The destined heir of Cæsar’s imperium was already in the camp at

Apollonia, taking lessons at the same time both in arts and arms under

the care of the ablest teachers. This young man was Caius Octavius, the

son of Cæsar’s sister’s daughter, who, now beginning his nineteenth

year, gave splendid promise of future excellence, marred only by the

extreme delicacy of his health, which had hitherto prevented him from

seeking distinction in the field. The favour with which his great-uncle

regarded him had induced him to demand the mastership of the horse, but

this had been refused him as a distinction beyond his years. Cæsar,

however, had promoted his family from the plebeian to the patrician

class, an honour which he had accorded to a few gentes, whose names were

of great antiquity, among which was the Tullian, to which the character

of Cicero had imparted so much new lustre. He had allowed it, moreover,

to be understood that he was about to make the young Octavius his own

son by adoption, to bequeath to him the bulk of his patrimony, and the

dignities which the senate had declared hereditary in his family. These

dignities indeed were not associated in the mind of the Romans with any

ideas of succession. It was difficult for them to conceive the descent

of the dictatorship from the hands of mature experience to those of

untried youth, or the establishment in the sphere of a particular family

of the tribunitian power, the free gift of the sovereign people. It was

natural for them to conclude that their hero was intent on securing a

title, the only recognised title, on which according to their notions a

dynasty could be founded. Cæsar, it was reported, desired to be hailed

as king. His flatterers suggested it, his enemies readily believed it,

and hoped to make him unpopular by urging him to claim it. One morning a

laurel garland, with a diadem attached, was found affixed to his statue

before the rostra. The tribunes, Flavius and Cæsetius, indignantly tore

it down; the populace expressing great satisfaction at their conduct, and

saluting them with the title of the new Bruti. Cæsar affected at least to

applaud them. Shortly afterwards a second experiment was tried. As the

dictator returned from the Latin festival, celebrated on the Alban Mount,

officious voices were hired to salute him as king. A low and stifled

murmur again indicated the disapprobation of the people. “I am no king,

but Cæsar,” he hastily exclaimed; but when the tribunes punished some

persons who had joined in the cry, he rebuked them for their superfluous

or invidious zeal, in which he detected a scheme for bringing him under

unjust suspicions.

Cæsar’s friends, however, if such were the real promoters of the

intrigue, were not yet satisfied that the prize was beyond his reach.

They might familiarise the people with the idea of royalty by bringing

it repeatedly before them. Perchance the sight of the white linen

band, the simple badge of oriental sovereignty, might disabuse them of

their horror at an empty name. On the 15th of February, the day of the

_Lupercalia_, Cæsar was seated on his golden chair before the rostra,

to preside over the solemn ceremonies of that popular festival. The

Julian flamens were elevated to the same rank as the priests of the

god Lupercus or Pan. Antony, the consul, was at their head, and next

to the dictator occupied the most conspicuous place in the eyes of the

multitude. Possibly the novelty of the sight of the one consul stripped

to his skin, with only a narrow girdle round his loins, waving in his

hand the thong of goat’s hide, and striking with it, as he ran rapidly

through the principal streets, the women who presented themselves to the

blow which was supposed to avert sterility, was still more attractive

than that of the other in the laurel crown and triumphal robes which use

had already rendered familiar. When Antony had run his course he broke

through the admiring multitude and approached the seat of the dictator.

Drawing from beneath his girdle a diadem, he made as if he would offer

it to him, exclaiming that it was the gift of the Roman people. The

action was hailed by some clapping of hands; but it was faint and brief

and manifestly preconcerted. When, however, Cæsar put away from him the

proffered gift, a much louder burst of genuine applause succeeded. Antony

offered it a second time; again there was a slight murmur of applause,

and again on Cæsar’s rejection of it a vehement cry of satisfaction. “I

am not king,” repeated Cæsar; “the only king of the Romans is Jupiter.”

He ordered the diadem to be carried to the Capitol and suspended in the

temple of the god, to commemorate the gracious offer of the people and

his own modest refusal.

THE CONSPIRACY

[Sidenote: [44 B.C.]]

The tact with which Cæsar withdrew the claims which were thus prematurely

advanced for him baffled every attempt of the republican leaders to

excite a popular feeling against him. But in the upper ranks of the

nobility there were many who cherished such sentiments of hostility

towards him, nor were his personal enemies confined to the ranks of his

political adversaries. A plot was formed for his destruction, which

embraced sixty or even eighty conspirators, many of whom had been most

conspicuous in their devotion to him, and seemed most to merit his

confidence. Among them were doubtless some whose hopes of preferment he

had disappointed. But such was not the case with Decimus Brutus, who

had received from him the government of the Cisalpine, and was already

designated as the consul of a future year. Such was not the case with

Trebonius, who had just quitted the consulship for the administration

of Asia. Basilus, Casca, and Cimber had all received greater or less

marks of the dictator’s favour. Yet all these men now joined in the

intrigue against his life. Had they really loved the republic better

than their imperator, and regarded him as a tyrant and a traitor, they

should not have accepted the highest offices at his hands. But even the

chiefs of the opposite party betrayed no reluctance to profit by his

generosity. It was not the needy or disappointed among them, but those

whom he had honoured and promoted, who now raised their hands against

him. The most active conspirator, and perhaps the author of the design,

was C. Cassius, who had recently been appointed prætor. The cry of

liberty and the republic, which was in the mouths of all his associates,

could have little real influence on the sentiments of Cassius, whose

avowed Epicurean principles, no less than his late political conduct,

might vouch for his indifference to party. “I prefer,” he had written

to Cicero, “our old and clement master Cæsar to the ferocious upstart,

the son of Pompey.” But he was by nature vain and vindictive; his temper

fluctuated between mean subservience and rude independence. His sharp and

acrid humour had not escaped the observation of Cæsar, by whom the pale

and lean were accounted dangerous, and who loved, as he said, the company

of the sleek and light-hearted.

The conspirators required the charm of a popular name to sanction their

projected tyrannicide. M. Junius Brutus, the nephew of Cato, pretended to

trace his descent from a third son of the founder of the republic, whose

elder brothers had perished, as was well known, childless by the axe of

the lictor. His mother Servilia derived her lineage from the renowned

Ahala, the slayer of Spurius Mælius. But far from inheriting the zeal of

his progenitors, the Brutus of the expiring republic had acquiesced in

Cæsar’s usurpation with less apparent reluctance than perhaps any other

member of the Pompeian party. Despondent in her hour of distress, he had

been the last to join, the earliest to desert the unfurled banner of the

republic. After Pharsalia, he was the first to seek refuge in the camp of

the victor; in the city he was the foremost to court the friendship and

claim the confidence of the dictator.

He zealously served his interests by the discharge of important offices;

nor did he blush to govern Cisalpine Gaul for Cæsar, while his uncle

still held Utica against him. A feeble panegyric of the sturdy sage whom

he had abandoned while he affected to adopt his principles and emulate

his practice, seemed to Brutus a sufficient tribute to his virtues. He

had divorced his consort Claudia to espouse the philosopher’s daughter

Porcia, a woman of more masculine spirit than his own. But thus doubly

connected with strength and virtue, Brutus had failed nevertheless to

acquire the firmness which nature had denied him. While professing the

character of a student he still courted public life for the sake of its

emoluments. The countenance of Cæsar raised him to an eminence which

pleased and dazzled him, while his uncle’s renown seemed also to shed

a light upon him, and his vanity was excited by a saying, possibly a

jest, ascribed to Cæsar, implying that of all the Romans he was the

worthiest to succeed to supreme power. The weakness of his character may

be estimated from the means employed to work upon him. A bit of paper

affixed to the statue of the ancient Brutus with the words, “Would

thou wert alive”; billets thrust into his hand inscribed, “Brutus, thou

sleepest, thou art no longer Brutus,” shook the soul of the philosopher

to its centre. Under the influence of Cassius, who had married his

sister, he was led to embrace the schemes of the conspirators, and

assumed the place of chief adviser, which they pretended at least to

offer him.

His renowned name became at once a charm of magic potency. It raised the

sick Ligarius from his bed. A pardoned partisan of Pompey, the clemency

of Cæsar rankled in his bosom. “How sad for Ligarius,” said Brutus to

him, “to be disabled at such a moment.” The sick man raised himself on

his elbow, and replied, “If thou hast any project worthy of the name of

Brutus, behold, I am well again.” Ligarius was admitted to the secret,

and took an active part in the deed which followed. We learn with

pleasure that the conspirators did not venture even to sound Cicero.

The fatal intrigue was now ripening to its execution. As long as Cæsar

remained at Rome his fearless demeanour exposed him to the daggers of

assassins, for he had dismissed the guard which had at first surrounded

him, and appeared daily in public with no other attendance than that of

his unarmed companions.

His legions had been despatched to Illyricum. To the remonstrances of his

friends, from whom perhaps the rumours of his peril were not altogether

concealed, he had replied that it was better at once to die than to live

always in fear of dying. But from the moment he should assume the command

of his armies, his safety would be assured by the fidelity of his troops.

Once intoxicated with the splendour of royalty in the provinces, he would

never consent to return a citizen to Rome. He had promised, it was said,

to restore the towers of Ilium, the cradle of the people of Æneas and

Romulus. Possibly he might transfer thither the throne which the pride of

the Romans forbade him to establish in the Capitol. Or if the charms of

Cleopatra should still retain their power, he might take up his abode in

Alexandria, and remove the seat of empire to the shrine of the Macedonian

conqueror.

Such considerations as these forbade delay. The preparations for Cæsar’s

departure were almost complete. The senate was convened for the ides of

March, the 15th day of the month, and the royal name and power, it was

said, were then to be conferred upon him in the provinces. On this day,

as soon as he should enter the curia, it was determined to strike the

blow. The prediction was already current that the ides of March should be

fatal to him. Still Cæsar refused to take any precautions. He had lived,

he said, enough either for nature or glory; his ambition was satisfied,

or perhaps disappointed, and he was proudly indifferent to longer

existence.[c]

THE ASSASSINATION

On the evening of the 14th of March, Cæsar was supping with M. Lepidus,

his master of the horse, who was now at the head of a body of troops

without the walls, and was preparing shortly to march with them into

Transalpine Gaul, which had been assigned to him by Cæsar as his

province. It happened that Cæsar was engaged in writing, when the rest of

the party began to discuss the question, “What kind of death is most to

be desired?” The subject on which they were talking caught his attention,

and he cried out, before any one else had expressed an opinion, that the

best death was a sudden one.

A coincidence so remarkable was likely to be remembered afterwards

by all who had been present; but it is said, also, that he had been

often warned by the augurs to beware of the ides of March; and these

predictions had, probably, wrought on the mind of his wife, Calpurnia, so

that, on the night that preceded that dreaded day, her rest was broken

by feverish dreams, and in the morning her impression of fear was so

strong, that she earnestly besought her husband not to stir from home.

He himself, we are told, felt himself a little unwell; and being thus

more ready to be infected by superstitious fears, he was inclined to

comply with Calpurnia’s wishes, and allowed some part of the morning to

pass away, and the senate to be already assembled, without having as yet

quitted his house.

At such a critical moment as this the conspirators were naturally wide

awake to every suspicion; and becoming uneasy at his delay, Decimus

Brutus was sent to call on him, and to persuade him to attend the senate

by urging to him the offence that he would naturally give if he appeared

to slight that body at the very moment when they were preparing to

confer on him the title of king. Decimus Brutus visited Cæsar, and being

entirely in his confidence, his arguments were listened to, and Cæsar set

out about eleven o’clock to go to the senate house. When he was on his

way thither, Artemidorus of Cnidus, a Greek sophist, who was admitted

into the houses of some of the conspirators, and had there become

acquainted with some facts that had excited his suspicions, approached

him with a written statement of the information which he had obtained,

and putting it into his hand, begged him to read it instantly, as it was

of the last importance. Cæsar, it is said, tried to look at it, but he

was prevented by the crowd which pressed around him, and by the numerous

writings of various sorts that were presented to him as he passed along.

Still, however, he held it in his hand, and continued to keep it there

when he entered the senate house.

Mark Antony, who was at this time Cæsar’s colleague in the consulship,

was on the point of following him into the senate, when C. Trebonius

called him aside, and detained him without, by professing to desire some

conversation with him. It is said that some of the conspirators had

wished to include him in the fate of Cæsar; but Brutus had objected to

it as a piece of unnecessary bloodshed; and when it was remembered that

he himself, not long ago, had proposed to Trebonius the very act which

they were now about to perform, they consented that his life should not

be endangered. Meantime, as Cæsar entered the senate house, all the

senators rose to receive him. The conspirators had contrived to surround

his person in the street, and they now formed his immediate train as he

passed on to the curule chair, which had been prepared, as usual, for

his reception. That chair had been placed near the pedestal of a statue

of Pompey the Great; for the building in which the senate was assembled

had been one of Pompey’s public works; and it is said, that Cassius,

labouring under the strong feeling of the moment, turned himself to the

image, and seemed to implore its assistance in the deed which was to be

perpetrated.

[Illustration: DEATH OF CÆSAR]

When Cæsar had taken his seat, the conspirators gathered more closely

around him, and L. Tillius Cimber approached him as if to offer some

petition, which he continued to press with vehemence when Cæsar seemed

unwilling to grant it, and the other conspirators joined in supporting

his request. At last, when Cæsar appeared impatient of further

importunity, Cimber took hold of his robe and pulled it down from his

shoulders; an action which was the signal agreed upon with his associates

for commencing their attack. It is said that the dagger of P. Casca took

the lead in the work of blood, and that Cæsar, in the first instant of

surprise, attempted to resist and to force his way through the circle

which surrounded him. But when the conspirators rushed upon him, and

were so eager to have a share in his death, that they wounded one another

in the confusion, he drew his robe closely around him, and having covered

his face, fell without a struggle or a groan. He received three and

twenty wounds, and it was observed that the blood, as it streamed from

them, bathed the pedestal of Pompey’s statue.[128] No sooner was the

murder finished, than M. Brutus, raising his gory dagger in his hand,

turned round towards the assembled senators, and called on Cicero by

name, congratulating him on the recovery of their country’s liberty.

But to preserve order at such a moment was hopeless; the senators

fled in dismay. Antony made haste to escape to his house. A universal

consternation was spread through the city, till the conspirators, going

in a body to the Forum, addressed the people, and by assuring them that

no violence was intended to any one, but that their only object had been

to assert the liberty of Rome, they succeeded in restoring comparative

tranquillity. Still, however, distrusting the state of the popular

feeling, they withdrew into the Capitol, which Decimus Brutus had secured

with a band of gladiators whom he retained in his service; and there,

having been joined by several of the nobility, they passed the first

night after the murder. Meanwhile, the body of Cæsar was left for some

hours, amidst the general confusion, on the spot where it fell; till at

last three of his slaves placed it on a litter, and carried it home, one

of the arms hanging down on the outside of the litter, and presenting

a ghastly spectacle. It was asserted by the surgeon, who examined the

wounds, that out of so many, one alone was mortal; that, namely, which he

had received in the breast when he first attempted to break through the

circle of his assassins.[e]

Such was the untimely ending of Cæsar’s dramatic and history-making

career. Appian has left us a minute account of his last deeds and of

the plot against him. Let us look to him for certain familiar details,

beginning with Cæsar’s last military project.

APPIAN’S ACCOUNT OF CÆSAR’S LAST DAYS

“At length, whether he lost all hopes, or else for the better

preservation of his health, never more afflicted with the falling

sickness and sudden convulsions than when he lay idle, he resolved upon a

far distant expedition against the Getæ and the Parthians. A rumour was

spread that there was an oracle of the Sibyls which declared that the

Parthians could not be subdued by the Romans, unless they were commanded

by a king. This made some talk publicly that in regard of other nations

taxed under the Roman Empire, there needed no scruple be made at the

giving Cæsar that title. He having still refused it, hastened all he

could to get out of the city where many envied him. But four days before

the day appointed for his departure he was slain by his enemies in the

palace, either out of malice to see him raised to such supreme felicity

and height of command, or else (as themselves said) out of a desire to

restore the commonwealth to its first estate; for they feared that, after

having overcome these other nations, nothing could hinder him from making

himself king; yet as it appears to me it was only for the name’s sake

they attempted all things; for in the thing itself there is no difference

between dictator and king.

“There were two chiefs of this conspiracy, the son of that Brutus whom

Sulla put to death, M. Brutus Cæpio, who came for refuge to Cæsar himself

after the battle of Pharsalia, and C. Cassius who yielded to him the

galleys in the Hellespont, both of Pompey’s party, and with them was

joined one of Cæsar’s most intimate friends, Decimus Brutus Albinus.

He had always treated them honourably, and with great confidence, and

when he was going to the war in Africa, he had given them armies, and

the government of the Gauls, to Decimus Brutus of the Transalpine, and

to M. Brutus of the Cisalpine. Brutus and Cassius were at this time

designed prætors, and were in difference for a jurisdiction which among

the citizens is accounted the most honourable of all others, whether

they contended out of ambition, or only feigned to do it, lest their

conspiracy should be perceived. Cæsar was arbitrator between them,

and, as it is said, he acknowledged to his friends that Cassius had

reason, but yet he would favour Brutus, so much he loved and honoured

him, for all men believed he was his son, because he visited Servilia

Cato’s sister at the time she grew with child of Brutus, wherefore it is

likewise said, that in the battle of Pharsalia he ordered his captains to

have a great care of Brutus’ life.

“However, whether he was ungrateful, or knew nothing of it, or did not

believe it, or that he thought his mother’s incontinence of dishonour,

whether love of liberty made him prefer his country before his own

father, or being of the ancient race of the Bruti who had expelled the

kings, and now pricked forward by the reproaches of the people, who on

the statues of the old Brutus, and on his prætor’s tribunal had secretly

written such words as these, ‘Brutus thou sufferest thyself to be

corrupted with gifts. Brutus thou art dead, would to God thou wert now

alive; either thy successors degenerate, or thou hast not begot them.’

He, I say, young as he was, chafed by these and such like things, engaged

himself in this enterprise as an act worthy his predecessors.

“The discourses concerning the royalty were not then quite extinct, when

just as they were going to the senate Cassius took Brutus by the hand,

and said, ‘What shall we do if Cæsar’s flatterers propose to make him

king?’ To which Brutus answered, that he would not be at the senate.

Whereupon, the other again demanded, ‘What if they summon us as prætors,

what shall we do then, my friend?’ ‘I will,’ he said, ‘defend my country,

even till death.’ Whereupon, Cassius embracing him said, ‘And what

persons of quality will you take for companions in so brave an attempt?

Do you think there are none but tavern-people and artificers that put

writings on your tribunal? Know that they are the prime men of the city,

who expect from other prætors only plays and shows; but require their

liberty from you as the work of your predecessors.’ Thus they discovered

to each other what they had long had in their thoughts; and began to

try their own friends, and some of Cæsar’s, according as they knew them

capable of good things. They engaged in their design the two brothers,

Cæcilius and Bucolianus, Rubrius Rex, Q. Ligarius, M. Spurius, Servilius

Galba, Sextius Naso, Pontius Aquila: and of Cæsar’s friends they drew to

their conspiracy Decimus, of whom I have already spoken; Caius Casca,

Trebonius, Attilius Cimber, Minucius, and Basilus. When they thought

they had companions enough, for it was not convenient to communicate

this design to all the world, they gave their words one to another

without either oath or sacrifice, and yet no one changed his mind or ever

discovered the plot.

“There was nothing now wanting but choice of time and place. The time

urged, for within four days Cæsar was to depart and take guards. For the

place they thought the palace most convenient; for they concluded that

all the senators, though they were not made privy to it, yet, seeing the

action, would joyfully join with them; which, as it is said, happened at

the death of Romulus, after having changed the regal power into tyranny.

Wherefore this attempt would have the same success with that; especially

being not privily executed, but in the palace, and for the good of the

commonwealth. That they needed not to fear anything from Cæsar’s army,

being all composed of Roman people; in conclusion, that the authors of

this great action doing it publicly, could expect nothing but reward.

“Having all decreed the palace for the place of execution, there were

divers opinions concerning the manner of doing it; some being of opinion

that they should likewise make away Antony, Cæsar’s colleague, the most

powerful of his friends, and well beloved of the soldiery. But Brutus

opposed that, saying, that it was only by killing Cæsar, who was as

a king, that they ought to seek for the glory of destroying tyrants;

and that if they killed his friends too, men would impute the action

to private enmity, and the faction of Pompey. This advice prevailing,

they only expected the assembling of the senate. Now the day before

Cæsar being invited to sup with Lepidus, carried along with him Decimus

Brutus Albinus; and during supper the question being proposed what death

was best for man; some desiring one kind, and some another; he alone

preferred the suddenest and most unexpected. Thus divining for himself

they fell to discourse of the morrow’s affairs. In the morning finding

himself somewhat out of order with the night’s debauch, and his wife

Calpurnia having been frightened with dismal dreams, she advised him

not to go abroad and in many sacrifices he made there were none but

affrightful tokens; he therefore gave order to Antony to dismiss the

senate. But Decimus Brutus persuading him that it was more convenient, he

went himself, to avoid the opinion that might be conceived, that he did

it out of pride or scorn, he went to dismiss them himself, coming to the

palace in his litter.

“There were at that time plays in Pompey’s theatre, and almost all

the senators were at the windows of the neighbouring houses, as is

the custom in the time of spectacles. The same morning the prætors,

Brutus and Cassius, gave audience to those who made suit for it, with

great tranquillity, in a gallery before the theatre. But when they had

heard what happened to Cæsar in the sacrifices, and that therefore they

deferred the senate, they were much troubled. One of those that stood

there having taken Casca by the hand, told him: ‘You kept it close from

me that am your friend, but Brutus has told me all.’ Whereupon Casca

pricked in conscience, began to tremble; but the other continuing with

a smile: ‘Where then will you raise the money to come to the ædility?’

Casca gave him an account. Brutus and Cassius themselves being talking

together, one of the senators, called Popilius Lænas, drawing them aside

said: ‘I pray God what you have in your hearts may succeed happily, but

it is fit you make haste.’ At which they were so surprised that they gave

him no answer.

“At the same time that Cæsar went to the palace in his litter, one of

his domestics, who had understood something of the conspiracy came to

find Calpurnia; but without saying anything else to her but that he must

speak with Cæsar about affairs of importance, he stayed expecting his

return from the senate, because he did not know all the particulars;

his host of Cnidus called Artemidorus running to the palace to give him

notice of it came just at the moment of his being killed; another, as he

sacrificed before the gate of the senate house, gave him a note of all

the conspiracy; but he going in without reading it, it was after his

death found in his hands. As he came out of his litter, Lænas, the same

who before had spoken to Cassius, came to him, and entertained him a long

time in private; which struck a damp into the chiefs of the conspiracy,

the more because their conference was long; they already began to make

signs to one another that they must now kill him before he arrested them;

but in the sequel of the discourse, observing Lænas to use rather the

gesture of suppliant than accuser, they deferred it; till in the end,

seeing him return thanks to Cæsar, they took courage.

“It is the custom of the chief magistrates entering the palace, first to

consult the divine: and here as well as in the former sacrifices, Cæsar’s

first victim was found without a heart, or as some say without the chief

of the entrails. The divine hereupon telling him it was a mortal sign, he

replied laughing, that when he went to fight against Pompeius in Spain

he had seen the like; and the other having replied, that then likewise

he had run hazard of losing his life; but that at present the entrails

threatened him with greater danger. He commanded they should sacrifice

another victim, which foreboding nothing but ill, he feared to seem

tedious to the senate; and being pressed by his enemies, whom he thought

to be his friends, without considering the danger, entered the palace;

for it was of necessity that the misfortune to befall him should befall.

“They left Trebonius at the gate to stop Antony under pretence of

discoursing some business with him; and as soon as Cæsar was seated, the

other conspirators surrounded him according to custom, as friends, having

each his dagger concealed. At the same time Attilius Cimber standing

before him began to entreat him to grant the return of his brother who

was an exile; and upon his refusal, under pretence of begging it with

more humility, he took him by the robe and drawing it to him, hung about

his neck, crying out, ‘Why do you delay, my friends?’ Thereupon Casca

first of all reaching over his head, thought to strike his dagger into

his throat, but wounded him only in the breast. Cæsar having disengaged

himself from Cimber, and caught hold of Casca’s hand, leaped from his

seat, and threw himself upon Casca with a wonderful force; but being at

handy grips with him, another struck his dagger into his side, Cassius

gave him a wound in the face, Brutus struck him quite through the thigh,

Bucolianus wounded him behind the head, and he, like one enraged, and

roaring like a savage beast, turned sometimes to one and sometimes to

another; till strength failing him after the wound received from Brutus,

he threw the skirt of his robe over his face and suffered himself gently

to fall before Pompey’s statue. They forebore not to give him many stabs

after he was down; so that there were three and twenty wounds found in

his body. And those that slew him were so eager that some of them through

vehemence, without thinking of it, wounded each other.

“After this murder committed in a hallowed place, and on a sacred person,

all the assembly took their flight, both within the palace and without

in the city. In the crowd there were several senators wounded, and some

killed: there were slain likewise other citizens and strangers; not with

design, but without knowing the authors, as happens in a public tumult;

for the gladiators, who were armed in the morning to give divertisement

to the people, ran from the theatre to the senators’ houses; the

spectators affrighted, dispersed as fast as their legs would carry them,

the commodities exposed to sale were made plunder of, the gates were

shut, and many got upon the roofs of their houses to secure themselves

from violence. Antony fortified himself in his house, judging that they

had a design upon his life as well as upon Cæsar’s; and Lepidus, general

of the horse, hearing upon the place what had passed, made haste to the

island in the river, where he had a legion; which he drew into the Field

of Mars, that he might be in readiness to execute the orders of Antony;

for he yielded to him, both in the quality of Cæsar’s friend and consul.

“The soldiers would very willingly have revenged Cæsar’s death so basely

murdered, but that they feared the senate, who favoured the murderers,

and expected the issue of things. Cæsar had no soldiery with him, for

he loved not guards, but contented himself with ushers; besides, he was

accompanied by a great number of people of the robe, and whole troops

of as well citizens as strangers, with freedmen and slaves, followed

him from his house to the palace; but in a moment all these crowds were

vanished, there remained with him only three unhappy slaves; who putting

him in his litter, and taking it upon their shoulders, carried him, who

but a little before was master of both sea and land. The conspirators

after the execution had a mind to have said something to the senate; but

nobody staying to hear them, they twisted their robes about their left

arms instead of bucklers, and with their bloody daggers in their hands

ran through the streets, crying out, that they had slain the king and the

tyrant; causing to march before them a man carrying a cap on the head of

a pike, which is the badge of liberty; they exhorted likewise the people

to the restoring of the commonwealth; putting them in mind of the first

Brutus, and the oath wherein he had engaged the citizens, and with them

their posterity.”[g]

FOOTNOTES

[123] Appian[g] says that Cæsar arrived in Spain from Rome in

twenty-seven days, accompanied by a part of his army; Suetonius[i] that

he reached the Further Province in twenty-four. Strabo[j] seems to rely

on the same authorities as Appian. From Rome to Corduba or Obulco is more

than a thousand miles, a distance which it is utterly impossible for an

army to accomplish in the longest of these periods. The author of the

_Commentary on the Spanish War_ is contented with the expression _celeri

festinatione_, and Dion Cassius[k] prudently follows him.

[124] [According to Nicolaus, it was the conspirators who moved the

senate to declare Cæsar inviolable. They prompted this decree with

the cunning aim of hereby making Cæsar secure (as he would think) and

so inducing him to dismiss his bodyguard. After his return from Spain

whenever he came forth in public, not only in the country but also in

town, he had himself accompanied by a bodyguard. He did not dismiss this

bodyguard until shortly before his appointment as perpetual dictator,

which took place between the 26th of January and the 15th of February, in

the year 44 B.C.

“That this statement of Nicolaus rests on a pure invention can hardly be

assumed,” says Wiegandt, who gives it full credit, and adds:

“This is all the more probably true of the above-mentioned decree,

because it served the most vital interests of the conspirators. For, so

long as Cæsar was protected by his bodyguard any attack upon him exposed

their own lives to the hazard. Consideration of their own personal

safety, again, influenced the conspirators at every step. Even after

Cæsar had dismissed his bodyguard, the attempt was constantly being

postponed in view of the danger resulting from his numerous attendance.

In this way were rejected the various designs to murder him on the Via

Sacra, on the occasion of the meeting of electoral committees in the

Campus Martius, or during the gladiatorial games at the theatre. What

recommended the senate house to the combined choice of the conspirators

as a fit place in which to execute the blow was this, that here, secretly

armed themselves, they had nothing to fear from the unarmed friends of

Cæsar, and, moreover, might rely on the protection of the gladiators of

Decimus Brutus.

“A second argument in favour of the statement of Nicolaus is that a still

broader decree of the senate appears to have been based on the same

cunning motive. The conspirators had reckoned too little with Cæsar’s

sober practical nature when they hoped that as a man sacrosanct he would

renounce all armed attendance. As a matter of fact he attached so little

significance to the decree, that it never occurred to him to dismiss his

escort.”[h]]

[125] [“But,” says Florus,[f] “all these honours were but as decorations

laid on a victim doomed to die.”]

[126] [Sulla had raised the number of senators to six hundred; cf. page

444.]

[127] [On this much discussed question of Cæsar and Cleopatra it is

interesting to quote Froude’s opinion from his _Cæsar_: “Cleopatra is

said to have joined Cæsar at Rome after his return from Spain, and to

have resided openly with him as his mistress. Supposing that she did come

to Rome, it is still certain that Calpurnia was in Cæsar’s house when he

was killed. Cleopatra must have been Calpurnia’s guest as well as her

husband’s; and her presence, however commented upon in society, could not

possibly have borne the avowed complexion which tradition assigned to

it. On the other hand, it is quite intelligible that the young queen of

Egypt, who owed her position to Cæsar, might have come, as other princes

came, on a visit of courtesy, and that Cæsar, after their acquaintance at

Alexandria, should have invited her to stay with him. But was Cleopatra

at Rome at all? The only real evidence for her presence there is to be

found in a few words of Cicero: ‘Reginæ fuga mihi non molesta.’ (‘I am

not sorry to hear of the flight of the queen.’) There is nothing to show

that the ‘queen’ was the Egyptian queen. Granting that the word Egyptian

is to be understood, Cicero may have referred to Arsinoe, who was called

queen as well as her sister, and had been sent to Rome to be shown at

Cæsar’s triumph.”]

[128] [“Thus,” says Florus,[f] “he who had deluged the world with the

blood of his countrymen, deluged the senate house at last with his own.”]

[Illustration]

[Illustration]

The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 05 · 第 25 / 28 章