CRAWFORD'S EARNEST APPEAL.

Mr. Crawford stated that he had only been engaged after Jackson came to

Kentucky, a little less than three weeks. In concluding an earnest

appeal for a month's extension of time, he said:

"It is a question whether this man shall be hanged, go to the

penitentiary for life, or whether he shall leave the court-room a free

man."

The Judge replied: "You are not entitled to any continuance at all.

Tuesday, April, 21., will be sufficient time. The case is continued

until that day. Witnesses' names will now be called."

The following witnesses for the prosecution were in court and were

placed upon their recognizances of $100 each to be in court on April,

21.: J. B. Lock, Dr. A. B. Heyl, Henry Motz and Harry and Will Hedger.

While the court proceeded to other business of the day the officers

removed Jackson to the witness room, where he was kept for about fifteen

minutes before being returned to the jail.

The attorneys for the Commonwealth were sure of having sufficient

testimony to convict both Jackson and Walling of murder in the first

degree and objected strenuously to any continuance. Col. R. W. Nelson,

who volunteered his services for the prosecution, worked hard and

earnestly and through his efforts much valuable and conclusive evidence

against the prisoners was unearthed. He said regarding the disposition

of the head: "Without a doubt the head of Pearl Bryan is rotting in the

Ohio river. At the proper time we will produce witnesses who saw Jackson

and Walling make two visits to the Suspension Bridge and throw bundles

into the stream. One of these bundles the witnesses will say undoubtedly

contained a human head. The witnesses who will testify to these facts

have positively identified both Jackson and Walling and will do so again

at the trial, and their testimony will be of the most sensational

character."

On Monday, April, 13., Judge Helm fixed the day for Alonzo Walling's

trial, for Tuesday May, 5., 1896. Walling's Hamilton O., attorneys,

Morey, Andrews & Shepherd, withdrew from any further connection with the

case.

Pearl Bryan's headless remains buried at Greencastle.

The headless body of poor Pearl Bryan, taken to Greencastle, Ind., from

the Newport, Ky., Morgue on that cold, bleak wintry day in February, lay

in its beautiful snow-white casket in the vault in Forest Hill Cemetery

in Greencastle, until March, 27. The heart-broken sisters, urged on by

the friends of the family, had pleaded with their aged and

grief-stricken parents to have the remains buried, but their pleading

was in vain. Mrs. Bryan could not bear to even think of consigning the

remains to mother earth without the head, and Mr. Bryan, the aged and

heart-broken father, would only reply when the suggestion of burial

would be made to him, "The head must be found," "It must be found." It

was only after long and hard pleading that he at last agreed to permit

the burial of the headless remains. Hundreds of people had visited the

cemetery and gazed longingly on the stone receptacle in which the body

lay. At last the consent of Mr. Bryan was secured and arrangements were

at once put on foot to consign to mothers earth, all that was left of

the beautiful and loved, but misguided girl. Friday, March, 27., was the

day fixed for the funeral. It was a beautiful day and the sun shone

brightly from an almost cloudless sky. The warm weather of the preceding

days had caused the grass and foliage in the beautiful cemetery to

assume a decidedly bright greenish tint, and the trees were beginning to

bud. It was in every respect a most typical day. The cemetery lies just

south of Greencastle, surrounding a lofty hill within plain view, and

but a short distance from the colonial mansion of the Bryan's, where the

lovely Pearl was born and had grown to womanhood, from which she had

attended the Greencastle school and graduated with the highest honors.

It was here in the city of the dead, where lie her relatives and friends

who have gone before her, in sight of her home, at the highest point in

the cemetery, where the fond loving mother and father, whose hearts are

broken over the sad, sad ending of the life of their favorite daughter,

can look from the window of their room and see the tombs of "the loved

and lost", that the grave was dug. Mr. and Mrs. Bryan had insisted on

Pearls' grave being located on the highest point in the cemetery. Early

in the afternoon of the day fixed, an immense concourse of relatives and

friends, and of the curious, assembled at the vault in the cemetery,

where the remains lay.

Notwithstanding the large crowd, present, a deathlike stillness

prevailed. At last the hour arrived, and a few moments afterward the

carriages containing the grief-stricken family, arrived on the ground.

These carriages, bearing the possessors of so many heavily grief

burdened hearts, had hardly stopped at the vault when the large black

doors of the vault swung outward, and the dead girl's class-mates of the

"Class of '92", with bowed heads and aching hearts, filed slowly into

the sepulcher, and took their places around the plain white coffin, on

the lid of which was a silver plate with the single word "Pearl"

engraved thereon. It was indeed a most solemn and impressive scene, one

never to be forgotten by those who witnessed it. With heavy hearts,

tear-bedimmed eyes, and trembling hands, the loved and loving class-mates

of the beautiful victim of the crime of the nineteenth century, grasped

the silver bar handles of the casket which contained all that was mortal

of the poor, erring, misguided, but loved Pearl Bryan, and bore it to

the outside of the vault. Tender hands and loving hearts bore the

headless remains of the once bright, cheerful and petted Pearl, to their

last resting place. The remains were not exposed to view at the funeral

services. Slowly following the carriages, containing Rev. Dr. Gobin, the

officiating pastor, the family and intimate friends, the beautiful

casket was carried by the class-mates along the broad cinder path to the

grave where it must rest. Following the casket was one of the largest

crowds ever seen at a funeral in Greencastle. Arriving at the grave, the

casket was let down into the receptacle prepared for it. Simple services

appropriate and tender, were said. Dr. Gobin, made a few touching

remarks, a hymn was sung by the class-mates with voices filled with

emotion, and the services concluded with a short prayer. A new grave was

made, the horrible tragedy which cost poor Pearl Bryan her life was

recalled vividly to those who had known and loved her all through life,

and the headless body of Pearl Bryan, dressed in her magnificent white

dress in which she graduated from the Greencastle High School, borne by

the loving class-mates in that graduating-class, were consigned to earth

from whence they came, and covered from the view of those who loved and

knew her. Already a verdant carpet furnished by nature covers the new

made mound which is kept covered with beautiful flowers and one would

not think that this grave was a new made one, but the girl who lies

beneath that mound, whose tragic death startled the whole civilized

world, will never be forgotten by those who visit Forest Hill Cemetery.

The Trial of Scott Jackson.

The trial of Scott Jackson began on April the 22nd, before Judge Helm.

It is very remarkable that a jury was secured on the first day. Perhaps

this promptness has never been equalled in Kentucky. The completed jury

was as follows:

John M. Ensweiler, grocer, Bellevue; William White, plumber, Newport;

John Boehmer, teamster, Dayton; Merty Shea, retired merchant, Newport;

Louis Scharstein, grocer, Newport; D. B. Mader, carpenter and builder,

Dayton; William Motz, reporter, Dayton; Millard Carr, carpenter,

Bellevue; G. P. Stegner, grocer, Newport; John S. Backsman, cutler,

Newport; Fred Gieskemeyer, grocer, Bellevue; David Kraut, coal merchant,

Dayton.

When all the preliminaries had been completed the attorney for the

Commonwealth arose and stated to the jury what the prosecution intended

to prove. He said:

"In the spring of 1895, the accused, Scott Jackson, commenced living in

Greencastle, Ind., where also resided the deceased, Pearl Bryan, who was

the youngest daughter of one of the oldest and best families in that

vicinity. Her father at one time was a Kentuckian, having lived a long

time in Bourbon County, Ky.

"The accused, Scott Jackson, became acquainted with Pearl Bryan, shortly

after he arrived in Greencastle. By reason of his elegant dress,

polished manners and fluent conversation, shortly after his acquaintance

with her he became a frequent caller upon her and they were often seen

together. Succeeding this the Commonwealth will show, beyond a

reasonable doubt, that this innocent young lady became infatuated and

yielded her chastity to this man, and later on she advised him of the

fact of her condition. It will be clearly demonstrated to you, gentlemen

of the jury, that while she was in that condition she left Greencastle

and came to Cincinnati, so that her people would not be aware of her

unfortunate condition.

"That, in obedience to a request from Scott Jackson, she came to

Cincinnati on Monday, January 28th. We will introduce a witness to show

that he met her at the depot, and that she inquired for Scott Jackson.

That he met her on the following morning, Tuesday, January 29th. It will

be shown that he was seen not only in Cincinnati, but in Kentucky, and

that he was seen with her up to Friday night, and about that time he was

with her in a vehicle, and that he took her out to Fort Thomas, where

her headless body was found February 1st, 1896.

"That Scott Jackson was found in possession of Pearl Bryan's satchel. We

will show by two or three persons, to whom he made this confession, that

he left the satchel with two different persons after the finding of the

body of Pearl Bryan. That upon Friday night a light rain fell, and when

the body was found on the Lock property, near Fort Thomas, headless,

there was a large quantity of blood lying in clots near the corpse.

"The Commonwealth expects to show you the condition of the body at the

time; that at that place the decapitation of this unfortunate girl was

done, and this man, Scott Jackson (pointing to the prisoner), is the

fiend who decapitated the unfortunate girl.

"We will also show to you, gentleman, that this fellow led a double

life--as Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. Up at Greencastle he was a gentleman,

but in Cincinnati, he was in society of ill repute, and he made no

discrimination of color in his choice of women.

"That a week or two before the crime was committed he displayed a fine

dissecting knife, and that he was experienced in the use of a knife that

could have done that kind of work.

"Through Jackson Pearl Bryan was brought to Cincinnati, and the evidence

tracing her will be established beyond a reasonable doubt, and that the

decapitation was done by one who is deft in using the knife, as he is

known to be."

John Hewling, a lad about sixteen years of age was the first witness. He

testified to the finding of the headless body on the farm of J. D. Lock.

The second witness was Dr. Tingley, Coroner of Campbell County, Ky. His

testimony was very important. He described the spot where he first

viewed the corpse and testified that the bushes in the vicinity were

spattered with blood that had spurted from the headless trunk. Restated

that the head had been removed by some one who had practised in surgery.

The following dialogue occurred during his testimony:

"On viewing the body I found it had been severed rather high. The knife

had struck the vertebra, then its course was changed slightly downward."

"Did you notice any other cut?"

"Yes; one across the fingers of her left hand."

"What fingers?"

"Her four fingers, near the tops."

"Did you observe no cut on the thumb?"

"No, sir."

"Did you make any other examination?"

"Yes, sir."

"Can you say whether or not the cuts on her hand were recently

inflicted?"

"Yes, they were."

"I will ask you if, in your opinion (you have described the condition of

the body), whether or not the head was cut off at that place?"

"I think so."

"Can you say whether the head was cut off before or after death? Or, if

death resulted from the severance?"

"I think the artery was cut while the heart was still beating."

In view of the fact that the defense was seeking to establish that the

head was removed after death the last remark coming as it did from an

expert was very damaging to Jackson. The same witness was asked,

concerning the cuts on the hand which he had referred to.

"Will you explain to the jury whether the cuts on the fingers were made

before death?"

"Before death," replied the witness promptly.

He was then questioned more particularly as to the result of his

investigations as an expert. The fact that Pearl Bryan had been murdered

with a knife (though cocaine was found in her stomach by the chemist),

was established beyond peradventure by the witness. He also identified

the clothing of Pearl Bryan which was produced all soaked with blood.

On the second day of the trial the prosecution sprung a sensation. A

headless dummy was brought into the court-room dressed in the clothes

that Pearl Bryan wore when her body was discovered. The dummy was placed

in an erect position at the left of the witness box and facing the jury.

A lively tilt followed between counsel as to the legality of this

proceeding. The court finally ordered the figure removed and the clothes

produced separately.

When this was done Mrs. Mary Stanley, the sister of Pearl Bryan was

called. She gave a list of the articles that Pearl had when she left

home and identified all the valises and clothing which the prosecution

had brought into court. She also identified some handkerchiefs found in

Jackson's room by detectives after his arrest and named the store where

Pearl had purchased them in Greencastle.

The first evidence of the trial that directly connected the prisoner

with the murder was given by John A. Caldwell, Mayor of Cincinnati.

Jackson became flushed and nervous and at times fastened his watery eyes

on the witness with an intensity that became painful.

He stated that he was present when Jackson was examined immediately

after his arrest in the office of Chief of Police Deitsch, of

Cincinnati. Mr. Caldwell said Colonel Deitsch handed him a telegram; he

took it in his hand and leaning over and looking at it for quite a time,

with his eyes in this way, cast down, he finally uttered: "Oh, my God

what will my poor mother say," then he turned his eyes on Colonel

Deitsch.

When he asked me the question he rose from his position and began to

walk up and down the room. He says to me, "What shall I do?" I says, "Do

you ask me the question?" He says, "Yes." I says, "Tell the truth." He

said, "Many an innocent man has been in as serious trouble as I am

to-night," or something to that effect. I do not know that I get his

exact words.

After what I have related Colonel Deitsch asked: "Where is Pearl Bryan?"

Jackson said he did not know; that he had not seen her since he was home

during the holidays. He was asked where he was on Friday night. He said

at first he was at his room; he was not certain, but he was there. Then

he said he was not out of his room after 7:30 o'clock; he remained there

all the evening. He was asked who his room-mate was, and he said Alonzo

Walling. He was asked if his room-mate was with him. He said that he

believed he was. He was asked where he was on Thursday evening, and he

said he was at his room. He was then asked as to where Walling was. He

said he did not know where Walling was Thursday evening, and afterwards

said that Walling did not come home on Thursday evening. That was about

the substance of the conversation that evening. The newspaper men were

then allowed to come in, and a conversation was then held with him by

them as to where he was, much of which I did not hear.

"The next morning about 10:30 I went to Colonel Deitsch's office, where

the prisoner was sitting. Colonel Deitsch asked him where he was on

Friday and Thursday nights, and his answers were the same as he made the

evening before. I am not positive as to whether it was at that meeting

that Walling was brought into his presence, and the conversation turned

as to where Pearl Bryan was and as to whether either of them had seen

Pearl Bryan the previous week.

"Mr. Jackson admitted to Colonel Deitsch that he had seen Pearl Bryan;

that she came to the Dental College on Court Street for him; that he was

informed she was in a cab, and that he met her afterward, I think on

Tuesday, at the Indiana House, on Fifth Street; that he met her again on

Wednesday about one o'clock at the corner of Fourth and Vine or Fourth

and Walnut. He said in the presence of Walling that he had sent 'Wally',

as he called him, to notify her that he was going out that afternoon and

he would meet her that evening. Then he said he did not see her again

after that Wednesday.

"Walling said he went down and saw Pearl Bryan and that he went that

evening to Heider's Restaurant, on Fifth Street, and met Jackson, and

Jackson told him to go up to the Postoffice and he would find Pearl

Bryan, and to wait there until he went to his room and returned; that he

went over to the Postoffice and saw Pearl Bryan standing inside the

corridor, and he went on from there and wrote his letters.

"Either on that day or the next day Mr. Jackson was asked about the

satchel, and he said that he had left the satchel at Legner's saloon,

across the street from his room; he said that he brought it there and

loaned it to a student and he intended to take it to the college and

give it to him, but he did not give it to him. He afterwards admitted

that it was Pearl Bryan's satchel.

"I want to say that in the meantime, in one of these conversations, I

told both of these young men that they did not have to make a confession

to any person, that they were at perfect liberty to refuse to answer any

of the questions that were asked them.

"Walling in this conversation, when Jackson was present, said that when

Jackson came back from his holiday vacation he took him in the corner of

his room on Ninth Street, where they were rooming, and told him that he

was in trouble with Pearl Bryan and that he intended to kill her. When

asked how, he said, 'I propose to get a room and take her to the room

and give her some cocaine poison and leave her there.' Then again, he

says he changed and said. 'No, I will cut her up in pieces and take the

pieces and deposit them in different places about the city.' He said

that before he saw Pearl Bryan at the Postoffice--I believe that was

Thursday evening instead of Wednesday evening---he said that Jackson had

made arrangements to take her over to Bellevue, I think it was, or over

to the sandbar, or some place there and kill her, take her head off and

bury her. He said that Jackson asked all the physicians as to the

effects of different kinds of poisons; that he had a standard medical

dictionary in his room and studied the effects of poisons, and that he

asked one physician particularly as to the effect of cocaine.

"He said that Jackson went to a Sixth Street pharmacy and got cocaine

and brought it back, that he took out a small teaspoonful and dissolved

it in two teaspoonsful of water and put it in a bottle, as he said, to

give her so as to paralyze her vocal organs or throat, and then cut her

head off. Jackson turned to Walling and said: 'Wally, why do you talk

that way; you know you are not telling the truth; you know that you

killed Pearl Bryan.' Whereupon Walling says, 'No, you know that you

killed her; and why don't you tell where her head is?' Then, when

Jackson was talking of where Pearl Bryan's head was, he said, 'I don't

know; Wally says he threw it overboard.' Then he said he took the

clothes and made one or two trips to the river and threw part in the

river and some in the sewer, but he could not tell where."

"Jackson then said that there was a bundle that he had given Walling.

Walling was then asked what he done with it; he said that it was up in

his locker at the college; the bundle was sent for and brought in their

presence. It was a pair of pantaloons, which Jackson identified as his,

and said that he had not seen them for some time; that Walling must have

worn them.

"I asked the men as to where the other clothes were. Walling says,

'Jackson, why don't you tell him where those things are, you might just

as well do it now as any time?' Jackson said that upon Saturday night, I

believe it was, they were walking up Plum Street with a bundle and they

saw some young physician or one of the students coming towards them,

that Walling changed and went down Plum Street to Ninth and out Ninth,

and Jackson said he went along little Richmond Street and from there on

around to the room, and then down Ninth to Richmond, and out Richmond

Street, westward, where he threw the bundle in one of the manholes of

the sewer, but he could not state which. The sewers were drained and

searched and a bundle brought to the department which Mr. Jackson

identified as his coat. He first denied that it was his coat, and said

it was Wallings', but afterwards admitted that it was his coat, but that

Walling must have worn it."

A valise was shown to Mr. Caldwell and he identified it as the one that

Jackson had been confronted with. It was the satchel which had once been

Pearl Bryan's and the witness stated that Jackson accused Walling of

having brought away the head of the murdered girl in it.

The witness then spoke of the occasion when Walling and Jackson accused

each other of having murdered the girl. After this he described the

scene and last effort that was made to get a confession from the

prisoners at Epply's Undertaking Establishment (see page 84). This ended

the Mayors testimony.

The mother of Pearl Bryan was then called to identify her daughter's

clothing. The scene brought tears to every eye and a sob to every bosom

not wholly bereft of human qualities.

Allan Johnson, employed in a saloon at George and Plum Streets, gave

testimony that proved to be highly important. He knew both Jackson and

Walling as visitors to the establishment referred to--and which the

witness admitted was a house of ill repute. On the night of the murder

the two students called with a woman in their company. The woman must

have been Pearl Bryan for the witness identified the clothing worn by

Pearl on the night she was murdered. The party, consisting of Jackson,

Walling, and Pearl drove away from the house in a carriage.

George H. Jackson, a colored man, was called. His testimony was of the

most startling character.

He told that on the night before the murder he was approached by Alonzo

Walling at the corner of George and Elm Streets. Walling inquired if

Jackson wished to earn five dollars by driving a cab across the Newport

bridge. The colored man accepted. On the next night he proceeded to Elm

and George Streets to discharge the contract. A cab soon drove up with

Walling on the box. Walling gave him the reins and instructed him to

drive to the Newport bridge, giving route. This was done. Then Walling

got up on the box with him to further direct the way. Before long he

heard a noise that sounded like a woman suffering and they moved around

and shook the carriage and they broke a glass, and then I was scared and

I put my left hand out and my right hand on the lantern and it kind of

bent down and I started to jump off, and I said there is something wrong

in the back part of that carriage and I don't care anything about this

job, and I went to hand the lines to him and when I went to look at him

I was looking at a gun. He said, "If you don't drive this horse I will

blow you to hell"; of course, I understood and began to drive the horse.

At length the carriage stopped at the command of a man inside the

carriage whom the witness identified to be Scott Jackson. The witness

said, "I stopped the horse and the man inside of the carriage got out,

and when this man on the front seat jumped down and went behind and got

on the other side of the lady then I got down to shut the door and this

here man who sat in the rear says, 'Drive down and turn around and come

back and wait until I whistle,' and then I shut the door and they moved

off; the woman was in between these two men. I went down the hill and

turned around, and when I came back I saw them in the act of getting

over the fence. It was a kind of a three-board fence."

The witness then related that a panic seized him and that he ran away

from the scene as fast as he could, leaving the horse tied where he

stood.

If George H. Jackson's story was true there can be no doubt of Scott

Jackson's and Alonzo Walling's guilt.

The next witnesses of importance were the two detectives Crim and

McDermott.

Crim testified first. He said:

"I live in Cincinnati. Have been connected with the Police Department

about ten years; on the detective force two years. I was detailed on the

Pearl Bryan case. I went to the point where the body was found,

Saturday, February 1st, in the neighborhood of one o'clock, in company

of McDermott and Mr. Plummer, Sheriff of this county.

"I went out with Mr. Plummer and he described the position that the

body was lying in when found. I noticed a few spots of blood on the

ground, one on the side of the bank and the other down near the bottom,

where the neck was supposed to be lying. I noticed blood on the bushes

and on the edge of the bank. Mr. McDermott pulled the leaves through his

hand and the blood stuck to his fingers; he rubbed it on the back of his

hand and it made a red mark. I took one of the leaves and have it with

me now. This is the leaf. (The leaf was then exhibited to the jury). I

have kept that leaf in another book until I filled that one up and then

I placed it in this. It is a leaf I plucked from the bushes there. There

were a number of the leaves that had blood upon them, drops like

rain-drops would glisten on the same. I found near these blood spots an

impression in the ground as though some one had been sitting there.

During the time I was there some person took a stick and dug down in the

ground six or seven inches. There was blood down as far as he went, or

some red substance I thought was blood. On the top of the bank, I judge

three feet from where this impression was, there was a track which

looked as though it had been made with a rubber shoe of small size.

About the size of the rubber shown me. The witness also testified that

he had made a search of the room occupied by Jackson. He found a pair of

ladies stockings behind a trunk pointed out to him as Scott Jackson's

trunk and which had on it the letters "S. J." He also found, in the

trunk, a ladies pocket-book with a piece of gold chain in it. In a

closet was found a cap. McDermott was present when the search was made

and testified exactly as Mr. Crim did.

John W. Legner was called and testified.

"I live in Cincinnati. I kept a saloon at 225 West Ninth Street, nearly

opposite where Walling and Jackson roomed. Scott Jackson had been in my

place quite frequently; he came for a pitcher of beer."

"State whether at any time he left any article of any kind at your

place."

"On Saturday night, the 1st of February, between 7 and 8 o'clock. Mr.

Jackson, whose name I did not know at the time, but had seen on two or

three occasions, opened the door and asked if he could have the

permission to leave a satchel there; I told him certainly he could. He

set the satchel down close to the ice chest, left it there and went

away, and the satchel remained there until Sunday evening about 10

o'clock, when he came in and took it away. He left no directions as to

its disposal. On the following Monday night he came and brought it and

set it down in the same place where it was sitting before, and it

remained there until about 10 o'clock, or a little bit earlier; then he

came and took it away. I had no occasion to handle the valise on either

occasion. The valise shown me looks like the valise that he brought

here. He roomed right across the way from my place."

Little Dot Legner, a child belonging to the saloon-keeper testified that

the satchel was much heavier on the first night than on the second. It

has been conjectured, very plausibly, that the valise contained Pearl

Bryan's head, on the first night.

William D. Wood, of Greencastle, Ind., was called. Wood's name has been

very prominently connected with the case on account of his knowledge of

Pearl Bryan's condition and the part he played in sending the girl to

Cincinnati. In answer to questions he stated that he introduced Scott

Jackson to Pearl Bryan in August, 1895, and that some time afterward

Jackson boasted that he had become intimate with the girl. According to

Wood, Jackson left Greencastle in October to take a course of dentistry

in Cincinnati and that soon afterward Jackson wrote and inquired if

Pearl Bryan was sick. Wood investigated and replied that she was sick.

Then Jackson sent a prescription for medicine and said:

"Tell her to take two or three good doses before she goes to bed at

night."

The medicine had no effect. Additional prescriptions were then sent.

They were unsuccessful. Pearl continued "sick."

Wood then stated that Jackson went to Greencastle again during the

holidays. The condition of Pearl was becoming more threatening and it

was plain that something had to be done. Then it was that Jackson

suggested an operation. The witness testified on this point.

"He said that it was very frequently done, done every day and if he had

the instruments he could do it himself. Such operations, he said, were

every day occurrences and if we got it done she would be all right in

three or four days."

Before Jackson left Greencastle he tried to make Wood agree to send her

to Cincinnati where the matter could be attended to, but Wood claimed

that he refused, not wishing to have anything to do with it.

On January 4th, Jackson left Greencastle and returned to Cincinnati and

on January 25th, Wood received a letter from him in which he said that

he had secured a room for Pearl. Wood claims that he gave this letter to

Pearl. She read it and expressed her intention of going on the next

Monday. Accordingly on January 27th, she left Greencastle on the 1:35

train, going east.

On February 6th, 1896, Wood received another letter. He was then on the

train in charge of the officers, as an accomplice of Scott Jackson who

had been arrested. The letter was destroyed by Wood but he remembered

the contents. The letter read.

"Hello Bill--I have made a big mistake and we will probably get into

trouble. I want you to stand by me."

On the day before this Wood received the following strange letter which

was produced in court and which we already published on page 77.

The witness stated that the above letter never reached him--that it fell

into the hands of Chief Deitsch. The letter was most damaging to

Jackson's case.

The next and last witness for the prosecution was Chief of Police,

Colonel Deitsch, of Cincinnati. He said:

"On February 5th, about 10 o'clock at night I met Jackson in charge of a

detective officer named Bulmer on the corner of Ninth and Plum Streets,

in Cincinnati. I went up to Scott Jackson and said then, "We want you at

the Mayor's office." We walked into the Mayor's office--Mayor Caldwell,

of Cincinnati--and there was no one present at the time except myself,

His Honor, the Mayor, and Scott Jackson. Detective Bulmer came into the

office but walked out. I told Scott Jackson I had a dispatch for his

arrest. He sat on the settee, and I asked, "Where is Pearl Bryan?" He

said, "I have not seen her since the 2nd day of January, 1896, at

Greencastle, Ind." The Mayor partly read the dispatch and gave it to me,

and I had handed it to Jackson, and said: "Jackson read the contents of

that dispatch." He read it carefully, and then said: "Oh my God, what

will my poor mother say?" I asked the question, "Do you know where Pearl

Bryan is?" He said he did not. He got up off the settee and made the

remark over again. "Oh, my God, what will my poor mother say?" He walked

backward and forward. He made the remark. "Must I tell about this?" His

Honor, the Mayor, said, "Not unless you want too." The Mayor repeated

that twice. He said, "Jackson, you need not tell unless you want too." I

then again asked him if he knew anything about Pearl Bryan. He said that

he did not. Shortly after that conversation the reporters from the daily

press were admitted and my interview with Jackson at that time ended."

The Colonel stated that on the following day Jackson requested an

interview. Following are the Colonels words:

I asked Jackson. "Did you have anything to do with the woman down at

Greencastle?" He said: "Yes, I did." "Did you write a letter to Wood

advising him to give her ---- of ----?" He said he did, and shortly

afterward got a letter again from Will Wood, saying that it had no

effect. And in the meantime he had a conversation with Walling about

the subject. Walling advised him to give ---- of ----; then in a

conversation again with Walling about the matter Walling made the

remark: "Bring her up here and we will...." I repeated to Jackson: "Is

that statement correct?" He said that it was. "And did you send for

Pearl Bryan then?" He said that he did. When that conversation was

ended a satchel was brought into the office--a red satchel. Opening the

satchel I asked himto look into it; says I, "Jackson, what is in this

satchel; look." He says, "There is nothing." Says I, "Did you observe

anything unusual?" and I called his attention to some blood that was

on the inside of the satchel. He says, "I did not notice that before."

I asked him whether he had opened it; he says, "Yes; I took part of

Pearl Bryan's clothing on Saturday evening on the Suspension Bridge and

threw it overboard into the Ohio River."

He furthermore described a meeting between Jackson and Walling in his

presence in the course of which Walling and Jackson accused each other

of having murdered Pearl Bryan. The witness also repeated a conversation

between the two that took place in a peculiarly constructed cell, called

"The Sensitive Cell." A telephone attachment connected this cell with

other apartments in the building, hence its name. This part of the

testimony was ruled out by the court.

The defense began its testimony by placing Scott Jackson on the stand.

All the man's natural shrewdness came to his aid while on the stand. His

words were clear, frankly spoken and there was no hesitation in his

manner. He acted the innocent man to perfection.

There is little about his testimony that is very remarkable or startling

as he disclaims all the manner of knowledge of Pearl Bryan's death.

Neither does he accuse anyone of the murder. He merely adheres to his

theory that Walling is guilty--that is all. He maintains that Walling

was confused and panic stricken when he saw the articles in the

newspapers describing the finding of the body at Fort Thomas. Then it

was, says Jackson, that they hastened to get rid of all the effects

belonging to Pearl Bryan which were in their possession. He also

maintained that Wood sent the girl to Cincinnati and that finding her

here he tried to hit upon means of best taking care of her.

He concluded to allow her to remain at the Indiana House temporarily

until he could secure her private accommodations. As these could easily

be had he took her valise and started away to hunt for convenient

quarters. That is how he happened to have Pearl Bryan's effects in his

keeping.

His narrative was very smooth.

Miss Rose McNevin at whose home Jackson was staying testified that

Jackson had not left the house on the night of the murder, she stated

that she always knew when her fourteen roomers were at home. She is able

to remember for two weeks the exact hour of the night when each of her

guests came into the house. Her memory is quite a good one.

A certain individual who gave his name as Wm. Trusty was introduced by

the defense. Trusty claimed to have driven the cab containing Pearl

Bryan to Fort Thomas. He stated that she was dead and that Jackson and

Walling were in charge of the corpse. He claimes to have been told that

an abortion had been attempted and that the woman had died from the

effects of it, and that Jackson and Walling had undertaken to get rid of

the body.

Immediately after testifying Trusty flew for parts unknown. None

believed his story.

On May 12th, Colonel Nelson began his speech to the jury. It was a most

remarkable effort, being intensely dramatic and spell-binding in its

eloquence.

Colonel Crawford replied for the defense and made an able argument.

On May 14th, Colonel Lockhart made the concluding speech for the

Commonwealth and the case went to the jury.

After a short session the jury returned and informed the court of their

joint agreement that they find Scott Jackson

The Mysterious Murder of Pearl Bryan, or: the Headless Horror. · 第 48 / 50 题