CHAPTER XVII

SOUTH LONDON OF TO-DAY

[Illustration: A DOORWAY, CURLEW STREET, BERMONDSEY]

The expansion of London during the Nineteenth Century is in itself a

fact unparalleled in the history of cities. Those who call attention to

this miracle always point to the filling up of the huge area between

Highgate and Hampstead and Clerkenwell in the North, or the extension of

the town to Hammersmith on the West. Perhaps a little consideration of

the South may show a still more remarkable growth. I have before me a

map of the year 1834, only sixty-four years ago, showing South London as

it was. I see a small town or collection of small towns, occupying the

district called the Borough Proper, Lambeth, Newington, Walworth, and

Bermondsey. In some parts this area is densely populated, filled with

narrow courts and lanes; in other parts there are broad fields, open

spaces, unoccupied pieces of ground. At the back of Vauxhall Gardens,

for instance there are open fields; in Walworth there is a certain

place, then notorious for the people who lived there, called Snow's

Fields; in Bermondsey there are also open spaces, some of them gardens,

or recreation grounds, without any buildings. Battersea is a mere

stretch of open country. I myself remember the old Battersea Fields

perfectly well; one shivers at the recollection; they were low, flat,

damp, and, I believe, treeless; they were crossed, like Hackney Marsh,

by paths raised above the level; at no time of year could the Battersea

Fields look anything but dreary. In winter they were inexpressibly

dismal. As a boy I have walked across the fields in order to get to the

embankment or river wall from which one commanded a view of the Thames

with its barges and lighters going up and down--pleasant when the sun

shone on the river, but a mere shadow of the ancient glory when the

pleasure barges and the State barges swept majestically up the river

with the hautboys and the trumpets in the bows; when the swans by

thousands sailed upon the broad bosom of the waters, and in the middle

of the river the fisherman cast his net, as Edric had done fifteen

hundred years before at St. Peter's orders, when he brought out his

famous salmon. One walked along the embankment; the fields on one side

were lower than the waters on the other. Beyond the river were the trees

of Chelsea Hospital. Close to the river bank was an enclosure which was

called the Subscription Ground; here the subscribers came to shoot

pigeons--noble sport. If I remember aright, while the subscribing

sportsmen shot at the pigeons in the enclosure, others of low condition

who were not subscribers lurked about on the outside to shoot down those

birds which escaped from the murderers within. Close by the Subscription

Ground was a certain famous tavern called the Red House. I do not know

why it was famous, but everybody always said it was. I believe it was

much frequented on summer evenings, and that the subscribing sportsmen

close by, whether they hit their pigeon or not, proved excellent

customers for the drinks of the Red House. At that time there were

'famous' taverns all up and down the river on either bank. There are

still Riverside taverns, but the invasion of the new streets and houses

has driven them, considered as 'famous' taverns, either higher up, or

lower down. As mere commonplace public houses they probably remain

still. Duels were conducted on the Battersea Fields, and there were

certain historical associations in connection with these dreary flats.

Here, for instance, the Duke of Wellington fought his duel with Lord

Winchilsea. Other important people were also connected either with the

Fields or the Village of Battersea, but at the time I knew not anything

about them. The Battersea of my boyhood is gone absolutely: no trace of

it remains, except the Church. The Grosvenor Railway Bridge passes over

the site of the famous Red House; the most beautiful of all our Parks

covers the Subscription Shooting Grounds, together with most of the flat

and dreary fields; and houses by the thousand, with streets mean and

monotonous, stand where formerly the pigeons flew wildly, hoping to

escape those who waited outside the grounds as they had escaped those

who potted at them from within.

[Illustration: IN SNOW'S FIELDS, BERMONDSEY]

[Illustration: The Temple from the Surrey Bank]

[Illustration: HOLY TRINITY, ROTHERHITHE]

Let us turn to another part of the map and inquire into Rotherhithe. It

is curious that at one end we get Rotherhithe, the Place of Cattle; and

at the other Lambeth or Lambhythe, if it be the 'Place of Lambs' and not

the 'Place of Mud.' In 1834 the Commercial Docks are already there, but

without prejudice to the ancient and venerable docks of the preceding

century, Acorn Dock and Lavender Dock. A single street runs along the

Embankment, which it hides and covers: at the back of this street there

is a succession of small lanes and courts running back with tiny

houses--two or four rooms to each--on either side, and ending generally

in gardens of greenery--leaves and palings. You may still see, in 1898,

if you are lucky, the bows and bowsprit of a ship in one of the old

docks, sticking across the street, causing a momentary confusion in the

mind between land and water; there are riverside taverns which look as

if at a touch they would yield and slide into the mud below. In 1834

this street with these little lanes was the whole of Rotherhithe.

Inland--or in-marsh--ponds and ditches and creeping streams lay about;

one of the ponds survives to this day; you will find it in the middle of

the pretty garden they call Southwark Park, of which it forms the

ornamental water. And the rest of Rotherhithe, between the Park and

Bermondsey, is one unbroken mass of streets with no green thing and no

open space. All is filled up and built upon.

A little beyond Rotherhithe lies Deptford. On my map of 1834 I see a

little town, lying partly on the bank of the Thames, partly on the bank

of the Ravensbourne, which here widens out and forms Deptford Creek. The

greater part of the area of Deptford is taken up by the Dockyard, not

yet closed. As for the town, which now contains nearly 100,000 people,

about five-and-twenty little streets sufficed for all its people; it

boasted of two churches and two almshouses. One of these Havens of Rest

was so picturesque and so beautiful that it could not be suffered to

remain. Almshouses which are perfectly beautiful are only vouchsafed to

man for a limited period, lest other buildings become intolerable. Their

time expired, they are then carried off Heavenward.

Or turn your eyes further south. London in this direction now

covers--for the most part completely, in some parts leaving spaces and

fields here and there--Greenwich, Blackheath, Brockley, Peckham, Forest

Hill, Dulwich, Brixton, Stockwell, Camberwell, Clapham, Balham,

Wandsworth, Vauxhall, and Penge, and many others.

[Illustration: CZAR PETER'S HOUSE, DEPTFORD.]

It is difficult, now that the whole country south of London has been

covered with villas, roads, streets, and shops, to understand how

wonderful for loveliness it was until the builder seized upon it. When

the ground rose out of the great Lambeth and Bermondsey Marsh--the cliff

or incline is marked still by the names of Battersea Rise, Clapham Rise,

and Brixton Rise--it opened out into one wild heath after

another--Clapham, Wandsworth, Putney, Wimbledon, Barnes, Tooting,

Streatham, Richmond, Thornton, and so south as far as Banstead Downs.

The country was not flat: it rose at Wimbledon to a high plateau; it

rose at Norwood to a chain of hills; between the Heaths stretched

gardens and orchards; between the orchards were pasture lands; on the

hill sides were hanging woods; villages were scattered about, each with

its venerable church and its peaceful churchyard; along the high roads

to Dover, Southampton, and Portsmouth bumped and rolled, all day and

all night, the stage coaches and the waggons; the wayside inns were

crowded with those who halted to drink, those who halted to dine, and

those who halted to sleep: if the village lay off the main road it was

as quiet and as secure as the town of Laish. All this beauty is gone; we

have destroyed it: all this beauty has gone for ever; it cannot be

replaced. And on the south there was so much more beauty than on the

north. On the latter side of London there are the heights with

Hampstead, Highgate, and Hornsey--one row of villages; but there is

little more. The country between Hatfield or St. Albans and Hampstead is

singularly dull and uninteresting: it is not until one reaches Hertford

or Rickmansworth that the explorer comes once more into lovely country.

But the loveliness of South London lay almost at the very doors of

London: one could walk into it; the heaths were within an easy walk, and

the loveliness of Surrey lay upon all.

I have mentioned already some of the heaths, those which remain at the

present moment. It will be a matter of surprise to the reader to hear of

the many waste and wild places which have been appropriated and built

over in the last two hundred years. In the parish of Lambeth alone, an

extensive tract, it is true, there was nearly 500 acres of commons:

namely, Kennington, Norwood, Norwood Common (in another part of

Norwood), Hall Lane, Knight's Hill Green, Half Moon Green, Rush Common,

South Stockwell Common, South Lambeth and North Stockwell Common. With

the exception of the first all these are now gone.

[Illustration: ALLEYN'S ALMSHOUSES, 1840]

Look at Dulwich--the peaceful and picturesque village of Dulwich on this

map of 1834. It lies among its trees, its gardens, and its fields: the

venerable college of Alleyn is the glory of the village--nothing more

beautiful than this almshouse with its hall and its picture gallery. Yet

the people flocked out to Dulwich less for the picture gallery than the

shady walks, the fields, and a certain tavern--the Greyhound--which was

beloved by everybody, and believed to contain a particular brew of beer,

a particular kind of old Jamaica for punch, and a particular vintage of

port not to be found anywhere else, even in a City company's cellars.

There was, in fact, no more favourite place of resort for the better

sort of citizens of London than Dulwich in the summer. For the poorer

sort it was too far off, and cost too much in conveyance. The Dulwich

stage ran two or three times a day: it was not too long a drive from the

city; the young men rode--in those days the young men could all

ride--even John Gilpin thought he could ride; they hired a horse as we

now get into a cab. For those who lived in any suburb on the south,

Dulwich was an easy walk. Not far from the college and the village--Mr.

Pickwick lived there in 1834--were the Dulwich Fields, as beautiful and

interesting as those of Battersea were the contrary: there were, I

think, five of them in succession: the little stream called the Effra

rose somewhere in the neighbourhood, and ran about, winding through the

fields in a deep channel with rustic bridges across. In older days--at

the end of the eighteenth century, for example, the Effra, a bright and

sparkling stream, ran out of the fields above what is now called the

Effra Road, and so along the south side--or was it the north?--of

Brixton Road. Rustic cottages stood on the other side of the stream,

with flowering shrubs--lilac, laburnum, and hawthorn--on the bank, and

beds of the simpler flowers in the summer: the gardens and the cottages

were approached by little wooden bridges, each provided with a single

rail painted green. That, however, was before my time. In the 'fifties

the boys used to play in these fields, jumping over the stream: when

they left the fields and got into the village they looked about for Mr.

Pickwick and for Sam Weller, if haply they might see either. But I do

not learn that either sage or servant ever gratified those eyes of faith

by an incarnation.

Here are three hills close together: Herne Hill, Denmark Hill, and

Champion Hill. On Denmark Hill Ruskin once lived; but in the 'fifties I

was not conscious of that fact or of his greatness. It must be saddening

to a great man to reflect that the schoolboys have no respect for him.

The road up the hill was somewhat gloomy on account of the trees: the

houses, with their gardens and lawns, and carriage drives, and

smoothness and snugness, betokened in those years the institution of

evening prayers. I fear I may be misunderstood. At that time great was

the power and the authority of seriousness. To be serious was

fashionable, if one may say so, in City circles. Respectability was

nearly always serious: it was divided into two classes: that which had

morning prayers only, and that which had evening prayers as well. With

the young, the latter institution was unpopular--no one of the present

younger generation can understand how unpopular it was: a house which

had evening prayers made a deliberate profession of a seriousness which

was something out of the common, which the young people disliked, as a

rule; and it insisted on the sons getting home in time for prayers. This

profession of seriousness generally belonged to a large house, beautiful

gardens, rich conservatories, a large income, and a carriage and pair.

Denmark Hill used to appear to outward view as more especially a suburb

belonging to the serious rich, who could afford a profession of more

than common earnestness.

[Illustration: DULWICH COLLEGE, 1780]

Herne Hill was remarkable for consisting of three houses only, each with

its parklike grounds and gardens and its noble trees. Champion Hill I

remember as a green and grassy slope: there were no houses at all upon

it: but there was a road, and at the bottom of the road a green called

Goose Green--you may still find this tract of grass, but I believe it is

now pinched and attenuated. On Goose Green they kept ponies for hire:

the boys used to ride them up the hill and gallop them down the hill.

Beyond this green there was a much larger expanse called Peckham Rye: so

far as I can remember it was a most uninviting place formerly; not a

wild heath like Putney or Hampstead, not a waste place covered with fern

and gorse and bramble and wild trees; but a barren, dreary expanse of

uncertain grass. Boys would perhaps have played cricket upon it in

summer, but there were then no boys at Peckham Rye. Now, all this

country is covered with houses, and Peckham is like Bloomsbury itself

for streets and terraces and squares.

We have not only destroyed the former beauty of South London: we have

forgotten it. Ask a resident of Penge--one of the many thousands of

Penge--what this suburban town was like seventy years ago. Do you think

he can tell you anything of Penge Common? Has he ever heard of any Penge

Common? Well, it is exactly seventy-one years ago--viz. in May

1827--that Mr. William Hone--the compiler of the 'Every-Day Book,'

climbed up outside the Dulwich stage, proposing to visit the picture

gallery of Dulwich College. Hone was one of the first of those curious

and inquisitive persons who began to employ their summers in exploring

the unknown villages and strange places round London. The picture

gallery he could not see because it was closed; he therefore walked

across the country from Dulwich to a place called Penge. At the top of a

hill he found a choice of three roads. He chose that which led through

Penge Common. The place was thickly wooded: it was, he says, 'a

cathedral of singing birds.' At the mere recollection of that choir he

bursts into verse--other people's verse. Alas! the Common had already,

even then, been ravished from its owners, the people: it was enclosed;

it was doomed; it was about to be built upon. Mr. Hone consoled himself,

however, at the 'Old Crooked Billet,' with eggs and bacon and

home-brewed ale. Again, is there anyone in Penge who now remembers the

hanging woods? They hung over a hillside, and were as beautiful as the

hanging woods of Cliveden. But, like the Common, they are gone.

[Illustration: From the Tower of St. Saviour's]

Or let us ask the resident of Norwood what he remembers of its ancient

glories; whether there were any ancient glories. Has he heard of the

famous Norwood oak? Of the Norwood Spa? Of the gypsies of Norwood? Why,

the Queen of all the gypsies, unless there was a more powerful sovereign

at Jedburgh, held her court and camp at Norwood. Has this resident heard

of the views from the top of the hill, four hundred feet above the level

of the sea, whither the people flocked by hundreds to see the view and

to wander in the woods?

All this beauty is destroyed. Of course, the destruction was inevitable.

One accepts the inevitable with a sigh; we cannot have town and country

together. The woods are gone, the rural life is gone, encroachments have

been made upon the commons, the wayside tavern--the place was full of

wayside taverns--is gone. What remains of all this beauty is a fragment

here and there. Clapham Common, once a heath, now a park; Wimbledon

Common, Tooting Common; these expanses are mercifully left us for

breathing-places. Some of them, like Clapham, are transformed into

imitations of a park, instead of being left as a heath. All of them are

bereft, of course, of their old accompaniments; they have lost the wood

beside the heath, the farm, the ploughed lands, the tinkle of the sheep

bell, the song of the skylark.

We have seen in the course of these chapters some of the associations of

South London. I confess that, for my own part, I am not happy in

considering associations connected with rows of terraces and villas.

Here, you say, was once the house, with the park, of such and such a

great man. Really! I dare say. But it is now covered with gentility. If

I am taken to a slum--such a slum as that on the west of St. Mary

Overies, and am told that in this place was Winchester House, I am at

once interested. Why should the memory of the past appeal to our

imagination more in a slum than in a brand new, spick and span

collection of pleasant country villas? Is it from a feeling that all

things tend to decay, and that the new suburb speaks not of decay? Who,

for instance, stepping from the south-east corner of Tooting Common into

the place which was once Streatham Park, can think of Mrs. Thrale and

Dr. Johnson among these roads and villas? At Tooting itself, one might

remember, were it not for the houses, Daniel De Foe, who founded the

first Independent chapel there. At Wandsworth, if it were not so much

built upon, I might see Voltaire walking about. At Putney, but for the

villas, I should look for Pitt. Oh! there are a thousand people once

living, and walking, and playing their parts in their villages, whose

wraiths and spectres would willingly haunt them still, but cannot for

the bricks and the walls, the chimneys and the smoke, the roads and the

trams.

We have destroyed the beauty of South London: we have also made its

historical associations impossible.

[Illustration: RED CROSS GARDENS, Southwark]

The first settlers or colonisers of this region, apart from its rural

folk, came from London about the time when roads began to be tolerable;

that is to say, late in the seventeenth century; they were the great

folk, the leisured folk, the Quality, who had suburban houses in

addition to their town houses and their country houses. They sought

shelter in the quiet retreats of Clapham, Streatham, or Norwood. These

people did not come, however, to settle, but only remained, as a rule,

for a year or two, for a few months, for a season. When the roads

became so far improved as to make driving easy and pleasant, the city

merchants came and built or bought big houses, and drove in and out

every day in their carriage and pair. They did not buy estates, as a

rule: they bought a substantial house and grounds, and sat down therein.

They had large gardens behind, with greenhouses where they grew early

strawberries; they had in front a broad lawn with a carriage drive; they

liked to have on the lawn two stately cedars, whose branches swept the

grass. They brought their friends down from Saturday to Monday. In

course of time other people came; but the first comers--these

merchants--were the aristocracy, the first families of the suburbs. In

the newer places there are still to be found the first families; in the

older suburbs they have all disappeared from the place. Thus Clapham, I

believe, knows no longer a Macaulay, a Wilberforce, a Venn. These were

people of national distinction. Of course there were not in other

suburbs first families who rose to the giddy heights attained by these

fortunate aristocrats of the suburbs; but there were many which had

among them ex-Lord Mayors and Aldermen; there were many persons among

them of dignity and authority. Alas! the first families are gone: there

is now no aristocracy of the suburb left. It is a pity. There should be

in every community some whose position entitles them to respect and

authority; there should be some to take the lead naturally; there should

be some who should maintain the standards of conduct, ideas, and

principles. Especially is this the case when by far the greater part of

the people in a community are engaged in trade.

[Illustration: ST. SAVIOUR'S DOCK]

I cannot quite avoid the use of figures, because a comparison between

the population of these villages in 1801 with that of these great towns

in 1898 is so startling that it must be recorded. Battersea has risen

from 3,365 to 165,115; Camberwell from 7,059 to 253,076; Lambeth from

27,985 to 295,033; Lewisham from 4,007 to 104,521; Wandsworth from

14,283 to 187,264. Or, taking the whole area of South London, that part

which is covered by the electoral districts, there is now a population

of very nearly two millions; in other words the population, in less than

a hundred years, has been multiplied by ten. That of London itself, in

the same time, the London including the City, Clerkenwell, Whitechapel,

Bloomsbury, and Westminster, has been multiplied during the same time by

five. What has caused this enormous increase in South London? Well,

people must live somewhere; the old limits proved insufficient. First,

places which had been dotted over with fields and gardens and vacant

places, such as Southwark on the west side, and Bermondsey, were

completely built over and inhabited. Then, when it became a problem how

to stow away the people within reach of their work, the 'short stage'

was supplemented by the omnibus. Next South London stretched itself out

farther; it began to include Camberwell, Brixton, Stockwell, Clapham,

and Wandsworth. These were separate suburbs lying each among its own

gardens; the inhabitants were not clerks, but principals and employers,

substantial merchants and flourishing shopkeepers. The clerks lived

nearer London, mostly on the north of the river. Lastly came the

railway, when London made another step outward, so as to take in the

places lying south of Clapham and Brixton. Then the builder began; he

saw that a new class of residents would be attracted by small houses and

low rents. The houses sprang up as if in a single night; streets in a

month, churches and chapels in a quarter. The population of South London

no longer consists of rich merchants, principals, and partners. Clerks,

assistants, and employés of all kinds now crowd the morning and evening

trains.

If you want to form some idea of the South London folk, go stand inside

Cannon Street Station and watch the trains come in, each with its

freight of those who earn their daily bread within the City. See them

pass out--by the hundred--by the thousand--by the fifty thousand. The

brain reels at the mere contemplation of this mighty multitude which

comes in every morning and goes out every afternoon. As they hurry past

you observe on each the same expression, the same set eagerness, with

which the day's work is approached. Employer or employé, principal or

clerk, it matters nothing. The clerk, who will get none of the thousands

he is helping to secure, comes in to town as eager for the fray as his

master; the fighting instinct is in the man; his face means battle,

daily battle, in which the weapons are superior knowledge, earlier

knowledge, keen sight, readiness, ruthlessness, while there is as much

need, for success, or courage tenacity, and bluff as in any battle

between contending armies. The many twinkling feet pass out of the

station by the hundred thousand, every morning, to the field of battle.

The English are a warlike people; they enjoy the field of battle; the

City is like that state of beatitude which the pious Dane desired, in

which there would be fighting every day, and all day, and for ever.

[Illustration: Below Cherry Garden Pier]

In South London there are two millions of people. It is therefore one of

the great cities of the world. It stands upon an area about twelve

miles long and five or six broad--but its limits cannot be laid down

even approximately. It is a city without a municipality, without a

centre, without a civic history; it has no newspapers, magazines, or

journals; it has no university; it has no colleges, apart from medicine;

it has no intellectual, artistic, scientific, musical, literary

centre--unless the Crystal Palace can be considered a centre; its

residents have no local patriotism or enthusiasm--one cannot imagine a

man proud of New Cross; it has no theatres, except of a very popular or

humble kind; it has no clubs, it has no public buildings, it has no West

End. It is argued that although it has none of these things, yet it has

them all by right of being a part of London. That is, in a sense, true.

The theatres, concerts, picture galleries of the West End are accessible

to the South. Far be it from me to deny the culture of Sydenham and the

artistic elevation of Tooting. Yet one feels there must surely be some

disadvantage in being separated from the literary and artistic circles

whose members, it must be confessed, reside for the most part in North

London. It must surely, one thinks, be a disadvantage for a young man

who would pursue a career in art not to live among people who habitually

talk of art and think of art. It must surely be some disadvantage to

live in a place where the people, when they are gathered together,

mostly allow the conversation to turn upon things connected with the

City.

How are these two millions distributed?

There are, in fact, four layers. First, there is the 'submerged'

element, the people of the slums of which mention has been made. Their

numbers and their proportion to the whole I know not. Next, there are

the working people, those for whom the long lines, the endless lines, of

barracks called model lodging-houses, have been built. Here they live by

the hundred thousand--by the million: there are more than a million

working men in South London. For their use are the shops of the

Borough, chiefly provision shops, and the public houses. The third layer

is found on a slip of ground, of which Newington and Kennington may be

taken as representative: it consists principally of lodging-houses for

clerks. The fourth layer is that of the suburban villa, from the little

semi-detached cottage to the stately mansion. The 'High Street,' filled

with shops, is for the villas.

[Illustration: The George Inn

Little Dorrit's Window in the Marshalsea]

Now, the whole of this immense population lives upon the City. The

bread-winners go in and out every day; the local shops provide for the

houses, and are paid out of the money made in the City; the local

doctor, the local house agent, the local schoolmaster, the local

clergyman, all receive their share of the money made in the City; even

if there be, here and there, a literary man, his wares are bought by the

money made in the City; the artist looks for his patron to the City;

the working man, whatever his work, is paid out of the City, so that the

first function of the City is to feed and supply all these millions. If

at any time the trade of the City were to decay, these suburbs would

decay as well; if the decay were gradual, they would slowly cease to

spread, begin to show empty houses and deserted streets; if the decay

were to mean ruin, the suburbs would themselves be speedily deserted.

Then would be seen a deserted city on a scale never before equalled.

Tadmor in the Wilderness would be a mere little wheelbarrow full of

stones compared with suburban London given over to decay and wreck.

Two millions of people, most of whom belong to the working class! The

brain reels at thinking of this teeming multitudinous life; these armies

of men, women, and children living in the slums and in the huge,

unlovely barracks. The very number makes it impossible to grasp the

enormity of the mass; the vastness of the population makes one feel as

if individual effort would be absolutely useless. In a sense it is

useless, because it can only touch one or two, and what are they among

so many? But in another sense, as I will presently show, individual

effort may produce consequences both deep and widespread.

It seems, again, when one contemplates this mass of humanity--this

compact round ball of men and women, to make which two millions have

been brought together--as if any one life was nothing, as if the life of

any one out of the heap--any girl, any lad--was wholly unimportant and

trivial, however that life were spent. That is not so: every heap is

made up of atoms; the influence of the individual is as great in a

densely populated place as in a village. One example is precious--beyond

all price--in a model dwelling-house of Bermondsey as in the most

retired community of rustics. It is very easy to generalise from the

mass: the dweller of the slums stands before the mind's eye, beery,

unwashed, in rags, inarticulate, his brain filled with thoughts which

may better be described as suspicions, desirous of nothing but of food,

drink, and warmth. That is what we think of him. It is because we do not

know him. Ask those who go down among these people habitually, they will

tell you of differences and distinctions among them as among ourselves,

of memories of better things, of resignation rather than despair, and,

at the very worst, of traits of generosity and unselfishness worthy of a

clean cottage and the air of a village green. We must be very careful

how we form general conclusions about men and women.

[Illustration: Alcove from Old London Bridge, now at Guy's]

But--two millions of people! And every one of them wanting all the time

what he thinks will make his life more happy. For the riverside folk the

wants are few, but they are daily wants. With them, literally, it is a

question of daily bread. Happy are the people whose wants are more

numerous and their happiness more complex!

Let me terminate this chapter by a brief account of certain work of a

philanthropic kind which is characteristic of the place and of the time.

Many and various are the attempts and the associations and the machinery

for raising some of these people and for keeping others from sliding

down. There are the parish clergy, of late years better organised than

at any previous time, more active, and more largely assisted; they have

planted evening schools and clubs, for boys and girls. One must put the

Church of England first, not only because her clergy began the work of

rescue, but also because hers is still the larger part. There is, next,

the indirect work of the medical students of Guy's and St. Thomas's, who

go in and out among the worst courts, tolerated because they come to

doctor the sick, and do not ask disagreeable questions about the

children's school. There are, next, places which aim at civilising by

the presentation of things civilised. For instance, there is a very

pleasing institute in Whitecross Street, where a garden, an open air

band, a lecture or concert hall, and a row of cottages beautiful to look

upon are provided as a standard to which the people may rise by degrees.

There are one or two Polytechnics for the lads, and, lastly, there are

the 'Settlements,' college settlements and others. Let me briefly

describe the work and aims of one of these settlements. I have before me

the last Report of the Browning Settlement in Walworth. It is called the

Browning Settlement because its headquarters is the chapel in York

Street in which Robert Browning was christened.

[Illustration: The Entrance Gates to Guy's]

As for their plan of work, perhaps the aims and methods of a

'settlement' are not too well known for repetition. They are not all the

same, but the differences are slight. The directors of this settlement,

for instance, desire to plant a settlement house in every poor street; a

house which shall be inhabited by the workers, men or women, and shall

serve as a model for the other people in the street; example, in fact,

is relied upon as a potent influence. There is, or will be, a large club

house and coffee tavern for men and women, boys and girls. Once a week

there is a concert in the hall. The members of the settlement take as

large a part as possible in the local government; they have laid out a

burial-ground at the back of their hall as a garden; they have a medical

mission which gives consultations free; some of them are poor men's

lawyers; they have introduced the University Extension Lectures; they

have founded thrift agencies; they hold Sunday afternoons for the men;

they have a maternity society; they have a clothes store; they have an

adult school. Classes are held in hygiene, mathematics, and classics;

there have been Shakespeare readings, music, singing, country holidays,

summer camps, children's holidays; there is a boys' brigade; there is

musical drill; there are May Day and Harvest Festivals; and there are,

in addition, works of religion and temperance which I have not

enumerated above.

The keynote of all such work as this is, for the workers, personal

service; for the people, the influence of example, the attraction of

things which they understand at once to be a great deal more pleasant

than the bar and the tap-room; such a variety of work and recreation as

may drag all into the net except the substratum of all, whom nothing can

lift out of the mire.

One or two things have yet to be learned as regards these settlements.

First, how large an area in a densely populated part can be covered by a

single settlement? Next, how many young men can be found to carry on the

work? For instance, if the Browning Settlement can reach--of course it

cannot--all the people of Walworth, which is in the Parish of Newington,

and includes 120,000 people, there ought to be nine other settlements in

South London from Battersea to Greenwich, both included. If we give

20,000 people for each settlement, then there ought to be at least fifty

settlements for the millions of the working class. The Report does not

state how many residents there are, but gives a list of the officers and

managers of departments, from which it would seem that about thirty are

actively engaged from day to day. So that fifteen hundred voluntary

workers in all would be required in order to cover this land of slums

with an effective string of settlements.

[Illustration: A Former Entrance to St. Thomas's Hospital]

There never was a time when more determined efforts have been made for

the elevation of the submerged, and there never was a time when so many

young men and young women have been found ready to give the whole of

their time, or all their spare time, to the work. Whether they will

succeed in effecting a permanent improvement remains to be seen;

whether the attraction of personal devotion which is now passing over

the minds of the young will continue and remain with us has also to be

proved. The directors of the Browning Settlement meantime declare--I

have no intention of questioning the truth of their assertion--that they

find already among the people 'a quickening of spirit, shown in keener

intellectual interest, intenser civic ardour, warmer friendship, and

more avowed piety.' If such are the fruits of a settlement, we cannot

but desire for South London a chain of settlements reaching from

Battersea to Greenwich, both inclusive.

NOTE.--Since this was written several new Theatres have been built

in South London. I should therefore like to correct the passage on

p. 320 which states that the Theatres are humble. Also I would

acknowledge the existence of local newspapers, and instead of saying

that it has no public buildings I would say only one or two old

buildings.

INDEX

Acrensis, Thomas, 161

Actors, Company of, 225-228

Ailwin, Childe, 52

Albion Island, 4

Alfred repairs the Walls, 31

Allectus, Emperor, 18, 26

Alleyn, Edward, 271

Arundell, Archbishop, 114, 116

Asclepiodotus, 29

Awdry, Legend of, 15

Bankside, 217

Battersea Fields, 303, 304

Battle of Clapham Common, 18

-- on London Bridge, 148-150

Bear Garden Alley, 214

'Below Bridge,' 229

Bermondsey, Religious House, 51

-- Spa Gardens, 292

-- Hall, 233

Bill of a Feast, 265

Boadicea, Queen, 26

Boleyn, Anne, 122

Bombardment of London, 153

Borough Compter, 249, 272, 278

-- Society, 260, 261

Bridge across the River, 12

-- at the Barefoot Tavern, 264

-- Construction of, 29

-- Destroyed and repaired, 44, 45

--, The, 25

-- when built, 26

Bridges, Roman Method of Building, 28

Bull and Bear Baiting, 210, 211

Burials and Marriages in St. Mary Overies, 64

Cade's Rebellion, 148

Canal of Cnut, Maitland's Discovery of, 38

Canterbury, Pilgrimages to, 163

-- Tales, 168-176.

Carausius, History of, 18

Causeway across Southwark Marsh, 6, 7

-- the Lie of, 6, 7

Chapel of St. Peter on the Wall, 4

Charles II.'s Restoration, 129

Charlton Fair, 188

Chaucer's Company of Pilgrims, 168-174

Chelsea--'Isle of Shingle,' 6

Christmas at Kennington Palace, 77-79

Clapham Common Battle, 18

-- Rise, 5

Clink Prison, 248

Cnut's Canal, Course of, 40, 41

-- Siege, 38

-- Trench, 38

Commercial Docks, 234, 305

Copt Hall or Vauxhall, 111

Count of the Saxon Shore, 17

Cranmer, Martyrdom of, 65

Cuper's Gardens, 252, 288

Danes defeated, 35

Danish Alliance against London, 32, 33

-- Invasion, Second, 36

Debtors' Prisons, 272

Denmark Hill, 311

Deptford, 234-238, 306

'Dog and Duck,' 289-292

Domesday Book compiled, 72

Dover Road, 25

Dry Ground beyond Kennington, 5

Duels in Battersea Fields, 304

Dulwich Fields, 309

Earl Godwine's Invasion, 42

Earliest Maps of South London, 47

Edmund fights Cnut, 38

Edward the Third's Entertainment at Eltham Palace, 96

Effra River, 310

Elizabeth, Queen, at Greenwich, 103, 105, 108

Elizabeth Woodville, 62

Eltham Palace, 69, 74, 75, 89-97

Eltham Palace, Remains of, 94;

a Royal visit, 94-96

Embankment, Early Repairs of, 12

-- First, of River, 11, 12

Extent of South London, 2;

its Islets or Eyots, 2-3

Fabri, Felix, Pilgrimage of, 176

Fairs of London, 179

Falconbridge, Bastard of, 153

Falcon Stream, 3

Falstaff, Sir John, History of, 134-152

Ferries across Marsh, 26

Field, Nathan, 223

Fisher, Bishop of Rochester, 110

Fleet sent against the Danes, 32

Ford of Thorney, 5

Freemantle, History by, 1

[Transcriber's Note: The reference on page 1 is to Freeman not Freemantle.]

Gildable Manor, 48

Gokstad's ship, 33, 40, 41

Goose Green, 311

Great South Marsh, 2

Green Dragon Inn, 262

Greenwich Fair, 188

-- Hospital, 109

-- Palace, 97-109

Hackney Marsh, 11

-- Marshes, 6

Hanger, Colonel, Memoirs of, 275

Harold Harefoot, 71

Hengist and Æsc, 20

Henry III. at Eltham, 90

-- VI.'s Coronation, 126-129

Herne Hill, 311

High Street, Borough, 10

-- -- Southwark, 254

Hope Theatre, Southwark, 221

Horseferry Road, Origin of Name, 5

Horselydown, 231

-- Fair, 229

Hubert, Archbishop of Canterbury, 118

Inns of Southwark, 16, 262, 263

Insignia of Pilgrimage, 157

Islands in the Marsh, 2

Isle of Bramble, 9

-- -- or Westminster, 4

Juxon, Archbishop, 120

Katharine of Aragon, Marriage of, 129

Katharine of Valois, 56-60

Kennington, Richard II.'s connection with, 81-88

-- Palace, 69, 73;

owned by Theodric, 72;

Christmas at, 78-80

Kings and Princes connected with Kennington, 81

King's Bench Prison, 272, 274

Lady Fair or Southwark Fair, 179-185

Lambeth Palace, 109

-- -- visited by Royalty, 114

Langton, Stephen, 118

Legend of Awdry, 15

'Le Loke,' 64

'Liberties' of South London, 48

'Liberty' Prisons, 49

London and Southwark, Difference between, 22

-- as a Port, 10

-- attacked by Bastard of Falconbridge, 154-156

-- Original Site of, 23

-- Site of, from the Causeway, 7

-- Third Siege of, by Danes, 36, 37

Long Barn, The, 70, 73, 75

Lord Mayor's Pageants, 133

Maitland's Discovery of Cnut's Canal, 38

Manor of Lambeth, 117

Marian Persecution, St. Mary Overies connected with, 199-204

Marriages and Burials in St. Mary Overies, 64

-- at St. Mary Overies, 192, 193

Marsh, Great South, 2

-- Islands in, 2

Marshalsea, 279

Memories of Greenwich, 98, 99

Mint Street, Southwark, Sanctuary at, 242, 246

Monastic Houses, 50

Montagu Close, Southwark, 242

Monuments in St. Mary Overies, 196-198

Morden College, 239

New Mint Sanctuary, 246

Nonesuch, 77

Norfolk College, 239

-- House, 110

Origin of Settlements in South London, 17

Owen Tudor, 56-60

Paris Gardens, 215

-- -- Baiting at, 212

Parish Clerks, Company of, 210

Parliament at Lambeth Palace, 113

Pax Romana, 17, 43

Payn, John, 147, 151

Peckham Rye, 312

Penge Common, 312

Philanthropic Work, 324

Pilgrimage a Mockery, 165, 166

-- Insignia of, 157

Pilgrimages, Choice of, 159, 160

Pilgrims starting from Southwark, 158

Playhouses in Southwark, 220

Pleasure Gardens, 282-288

Poets of South London, 224, 225

Population, Increase in, 316, 317

Priory of St. Mary Overies, 192

Prisons of the Liberties, 49

Processions in Southwark, 124

Punishments ordered by the Church, 68

Puritan Effect on Theatres, 221, 222

Ravensbourne, 2, 3

Red Cross Gardens, 315

-- House Tavern, 304

Remains of Eltham Palace, 94

Richard II. at Kennington Palace, 81, 82

River, First Embankment of, 11, 12

-- Wall removed, 28

Roger of Wendover's Chronicle, 21

Roman Connection with Causeway, 6

-- Method of Building Bridges, 28

-- Remains in South London, 14-16

-- -- at St. Saviour's Grammar School, 15

-- Trajectus, 10

Rotherhithe, 305

Royal Houses, 69

-- Manor, Valuation of, 72, 73

Royalty at Eltham Palace, 92

Rum, 10

Sanctuaries, Later, 241

Sanctuary at Southwark, 243

-- at New Mint, 246

Savoy Dock, 230

Settlements in South London, Origin of, 17

Show Folk of Bankside, 206

Site of London from Causeway, 7

-- of Original London, 23

Snorro, Thirlesen, 22

Society in the Borough, 261

South London, Extent of, 2

-- -- deserted, 20, 21

-- -- named Southwark by Saxons, 2

-- -- in Ruins and deserted, 31

-- -- Earliest Map of, 47

-- -- of To-day, 301

Southwark, Conditions of Existence, 12, 13

-- and London, Difference between, 22

-- Fair or Lady Fair, 179-185

-- Famous Inns, 16

-- without a Wall, 17

Stage Coaches, Start of, 258, 259

St. Mary Overies, 191

-- -- -- Dock, 10

-- -- -- Marriages at, 192, 193

-- -- -- reconstructed, 195, 196

-- -- -- connected with Marian Persecution, 199-204

-- -- -- in Recent Times, 205

St. Peter-on-the-Wall Chapel, 4

St. Saviour's Abbey, 51

St. Thomas's Hospital, 64

-- -- -- Foundation of, 66

-- -- -- Roman Remains in, 15, 16

'Stonegate,' 6

Stubbs, History by, 1

Swegen and Olaf, Alliance of, 33-37

Tabard Inn, 268

Tabard Inn, Chaucer's Company of Pilgrims, 167

Thames Fishermen, 14

Theatre of Southwark Fair, 185

Thorney, Trade of, 8

-- Island, Trade of, 4

Tournament at Eltham, 94-96

Trade of Thorney, 8

-- Route of South London, 4

Traffic through Southwark, 256, 257

Trench of Cnut, 38

Vauxhall Gardens, 294-299

-- -- Site of, 113

-- or Copt Hall, 111

Walbrook, 8

-- Origin of Name, 3

Walls repaired by Alfred, 31

Walworth, the Name, 23

Wandle, River, 2, 3

Westminster, or Isle of Bramble, 4

White Lyon Prison, 280

William the Conqueror enters London by the Bridge, 43

-- III.'s Entry into London, 131, 132

Willoughby, Sir John, 105

Wyclyf's trial, 84

PRINTED BY

SPOTTISWOODE AND CO. LTD., COLCHESTER

LONDON AND ETON

* * * * *

[Illustration]

NOVELS by SIR WALTER BESANT & JAMES RICE.

Crown 8vo. cloth, 3_s._ 6_d._ each; post 8vo. illustrated boards, 2_s._

each; cloth limp, 2_s._ 6_d._ each.

READY-MONEY MORTIBOY.

WITH HARP AND CROWN.

THIS SON OF VULCAN.

MY LITTLE GIRL.

THE CASE OF MR. LUCRAFT.

THE GOLDEN BUTTERFLY.

BY CELIA'S ARBOUR.

THE MONKS OF THELEMA.

'TWAS IN TRAFALGAR'S BAY.

THE SEAMY SIDE.

THE TEN YEARS' TENANT.

THE CHAPLAIN OF THE FLEET.

* * * * *

NOVELS BY SIR WALTER BESANT.

Crown 8vo. cloth, 3_s._ 6_d._ each; post 8vo. illustrated boards, 2_s._

each; cloth limp, 2_s._ 6_d._ each.

ALL SORTS AND CONDITIONS OF MEN. With 12 Illustrations by F. BARNARD.

THE CAPTAINS' ROOM, &c. With Frontispiece by E. J. WHEELER.

CHILDREN OF GIBEON.

ALL IN A GARDEN FAIR. With 6 Illustrations by HARRY FURNISS.

DOROTHY FORSTER. With a Frontispiece by CHARLES GREEN.

UNCLE JACK, and other Stories.

THE WORLD WENT VERY WELL THEN. With Illustrations by A. FORESTIER.

HERR PAULUS: His Rise, his Greatness, and his Fall.

FOR FAITH AND FREEDOM. Illustrated by A. FORESTIER.

TO CALL HER MINE, &c. With 9 Illustrations by A. FORESTIER.

THE BELL OF ST. PAUL'S.

THE IVORY GATE.

THE HOLY ROSE, &c. With a Frontispiece by F. BARNARD.

ARMOREL OF LYONESSE. With 12 Illustrations by F. BARNARD.

ST. KATHERINE'S BY THE TOWER. With 12 Illustrations by CHARLES GREEN.

VERBENA CAMELLIA STEPHANOTIS. With Frontispiece by GORDON BROWNE.

THE REBEL QUEEN.

BEYOND THE DREAMS OF AVARICE. With 12 Illustrations by W. H. HYDE.

THE REVOLT OF MAN.

IN DEACON'S ORDERS. With a Frontispiece by A. FORESTIER.

THE MASTER CRAFTSMAN.

THE CITY OF REFUGE.

* * * * *

Crown 8vo. cloth, 3_s._ 6_d._ each.

A FOUNTAIN SEALED. With Frontispiece by H. G. BURGESS.

THE CHANGELING.

THE ALABASTER BOX.

THE ORANGE GIRL. With 8 Illustrations by F. PEGRAM.

THE LADY OF LYNN. With 12 Illustrations by G. DEMAIN HAMMOND.

NO OTHER WAY. With 12 Illustrations by C. D. WARD.

THE FOURTH GENERATION.

* * * * *

FINE PAPER EDITIONS, pott 8vo. cloth, gilt top, 2_s._ net each; leather,

gilt edges, 3_s._ net each.

LONDON.

WESTMINSTER.

JERUSALEM. (In collaboration with E. H. PALMER.)

SIR RICHARD WHITTINGTON.

GASPARD DE COLIGNY.

ALL SORTS AND CONDITIONS OF MEN.

* * * * *

POPULAR EDITIONS, medium 8vo. 6_d._ each.

ALL SORTS AND CONDITIONS.

THE GOLDEN BUTTERFLY.

READY-MONEY MORTIBOY.

FOR FAITH AND FREEDOM.

NO OTHER WAY.

BY CELIA'S ARBOUR.

CHILDREN OF GIBEON.

THE CHAPLAIN OF THE FLEET.

THE ORANGE GIRL.

DOROTHY FORSTER.

THE MONKS OF THELEMA.

ARMOREL OF LYONESSE.

* * * * *

Demy 8vo. cloth, 5_s._ net each.

LONDON. With 125 Illustrations.

WESTMINSTER. With Etching by F. S. WALKER, and 130 Illustrations.

SOUTH LONDON. With Etching by F. S. WALKER, and 119 Illustrations.

EAST LONDON. With an Etched Frontispiece by F. S. WALKER, and

54 Illustrations by PHIL MAY, L. RAVEN HILL, and JOSEPH PENNELL.

* * * * *

Crown 8vo. cloth, 3_s._ 6_d._ each.

FIFTY YEARS AGO. With 144 Illustrations.

THE CHARM, and other Drawing-room Plays. By WALTER BESANT and W. H. POLLOCK.

With 50 Illustrations by CHRIS. HAMMOND and A. JULE GOODMAN.

* * * * *

Crown 8vo. cloth, flat back, 2_s._ each.

ST. KATHERINE'S BY THE TOWER.

THE REBEL QUEEN.

* * * * *

Crown 8vo. cloth, 1_s._ net each.

VERBENA CAMELLIA STEPHANOTIS.

THE ALABASTER BOX.

* * * * *

THE EULOGY OF RICHARD JEFFERIES. With a Portrait. Crown 8vo. buckram, 6_s._

THE ART OF FICTION. Fcap. 8vo. cloth, 1_s._ net.

ST. KATHERINE'S BY THE TOWER. CHEAP EDITION, picture cover, 1_s._ net.

London: CHATTO & WINDUS, 111 St. Martin's Lane, W.C.

South London · 第 17 / 17 章