These extracts prove beyond the possibility of controversy

(1.) That the rule of the Index of the Council of Trent has never been

permitted to fall into abeyance, and has never been repealed. From the

time of its enactment it has always been, and now is, the binding law of

the Church of Rome. It has been constantly enforced by Papal authority,

and is especially commended to the careful attention of the faithful by

the authoritative letter of the present Pope.

(2.) That no Roman Catholic is permitted on any pretext to read, or to

possess a copy of the Bible in his own language, without a written order

from the Bishop or Inquisitor. It matters not who is the author of the

translation, whether Protestant or Romanist, whether Luther or the Pope

himself; if any man either possess or read it, for that offence he is cut

off from absolution and thereby from church communion.

(3.) That since the days of Benedict XIV. it has always been, and now

is, unlawful under any circumstances to read any version without notes.

God’s word is not allowed to speak for itself; man’s gloss must accompany

it; the truth is forbidden in its simplicity; they are afraid to allow

the people to read even their own version, without superadding extracts

from “other learned and Catholic authors.”

(4.) That these versions with their notes may not be possessed or read

unless they are first approved of by the Holy See. Query. How many

versions approved by the Pope exist in the whole world? Is there one in

England? It is of course difficult to prove a negative; but those who

are best acquainted with the subject assert that they have never been

able to discover one. See Venn’s Letter to Waterworth, Jan. 15, 1845.

(5.) That the Church of Rome attacks the broad principle of the general

usefulness of the Bible. The Pope does not merely discuss the

comparative merits of this or that version, but goes boldly to the great

question, whether the reading of the Bible is really useful for the

people. The Jansenists, according to his own account, asserted that the

reading of the holy books “had been at all times, and for all the

faithful, useful, and so indispensable that no authority could assail

it.” This he declares to be an audacious assertion, and pronounces it

withered by the unanimous condemnation of the whole Catholic universe.

* * * * *

Sermons on the Scriptural Principles of our Protestant Church · 第 31 / 33 题