But yet the righteousness thus implanted cannot justify, for just look at

(1) _The works produced_.

There is a constant activity to be seen amongst the people of God; they

delight to do his will; they labour, and labour diligently, to relieve

distress, to comfort sorrow, to spread the glad tidings of the kingdom of

our Lord. Such works are the fruits of the Spirit, and they are

gladdening both to God and man. To witness them in the flock is the

highest joy of the Christian minister, and never do we know such true

pleasure, as when we see you, dear brethren, thus striving to labour

stedfastly for Christ. Ay! and they are the joy of one higher far than

we. They are the fruits of the Spirit, the delight of Christ himself,

the sacrifice well pleasing, acceptable unto God. St. Paul desires such

results as these, when he prays, {25c} “That ye might walk worthy of the

Lord unto all pleasing, being fruitful in every good work, and increasing

in the knowledge of God.” And Christ himself has put his seal and stamp

upon them, saying, {26a} “Herein is my Father glorified, that ye bear

much fruit; so shall ye be my disciples.” But how vain it is to suppose

that they can justify! they may please the Father, but they cannot

satisfy the law. They may seem fair before men, but who is bold enough

to pronounce them perfect before God? For remember that motives must be

considered as well as acts. See how St. Paul argues this, 1st Cor. xiii.

3, “And though I bestow all my goods to feed the poor, and though I give

my body to be burned, and have not charity, it profiteth me nothing.”

What could be a nobler thing than martyrdom? What liberality equal to

the consecration of all his goods to feed the poor? Yet if there be one

secret, hidden defect of motive perceived by God alone, the Apostle

becomes nothing, “it profiteth me nothing.” {26b} “Cut off then those

things wherein we have regarded our own glory, those things which men do

to please men, and to satisfy our own likings, those things we do for any

by respect, not sincerely and purely for the love of God, and a small

score will serve for the number of our righteous deeds.” It is with them

as with the drop of water. To the naked eye it seems clear and

sparkling, but when you see it under the searching light of the solar

microscope, you find it full of all uncleanness. So it is with the best

of human actions. To the naked eye they may appear pure and even

brilliant, but let the light of divine truth beam on their inward

character and motive, and there is so much defect, so much defilement,

that we are filled with wonder, not because they fail to justify, but

because God is so gracious as to condescend to say they please. Yea,

verily! if the whole church of Christ were to select from all its

multitudes the very holiest of all living men, and if that holiest of men

were to select the holiest action that he ever wrought in the holiest

period of his most holy life, that one act when referred to the heart

searching, motive judging, law of God, would be found so tainted with

defiling sin, that if his justification were to depend on its

righteousness alone, he must abandon for ever all hope of life with God.

“There is none that doeth good, no not one.” {27}

(2) We have here referred to outward actions, let us now trace the

stream up to its source, and look at the inward state of heart, or as it

is sometimes called “habitual righteousness.” Can this justify? We all

know what an inward change is wrought by the Holy Ghost in those who are

truly born of God. Their whole heart and mind and will are changed.

They love that they once despised, they long for that which they once

scorned, they walk with Jesus, whereas before they were the slaves of

sin. To recur to the simile employed before, as heat is diffused through

iron, so a new love, a new righteousness is spread through the soul. But

yet it cannot justify, for it is not perfect. It is sufficient to

please, but it is defective still. There may be great heat spread

through the iron, while still the metal retains its substance. The ice

may be melted, and the water retain the winter’s chill. Just so it is

with the righteousness planted in us by the Holy Ghost. There is a new

warmth, but the nature retains too much of its iron hardness: there is a

melting of the soul, but the winter’s chill is still found in the melted

spirit. This is the meaning of our article when it says “The infection

of nature doth remain yea in them that are regenerate,” and this

remaining corruption destroys at once all hope of justification through

the righteousness of the heart. Take one or two examples from the

Scriptures. There can be no doubt of the inward righteousness of David.

He was “the sweet psalmist of Israel,” “the man after God’s own heart.”

If the Holy Ghost ever gave the new life to any man it was to David. But

was David’s inward righteousness such that he was justified? Listen to

his own prayer, Ps. cxliii. 2, “Enter not into judgment with thy servant;

for in thy sight shall no man living be justified.” There can be no

doubt of the change of heart in Peter. The ardour of his noble mind was

nobly consecrated to Christ. But was Peter justified by his inward

righteousness? See how it failed. One wave of strong temptation broke

down his faith, and for the time chilled his love: so that on one evening

even Peter was thrice guilty of the denial of his Lord. Could Peter then

be justified by his inward love? There can be no doubt of the inward

righteousness of Paul. He was God’s chosen vessel to bear his name among

the Gentiles. His whole life bore witness to the constraining power of

the love of Jesus. But was he justified by that inward love? Listen to

his own affecting language, Rom. vii. 22–24, “For I delight in the law of

God after the inward man: But I see another law in my members warring

against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of

sin which is in my members. O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver

me from the body of this death?”

Or refer the matter to your own personal experience. It is a case that

requires no farfetched arguments. There are multitudes amongst you, I am

well persuaded, in whom the Holy Ghost has wrought this sanctifying

change. It is your joy, your delight, your chief desire to walk with

God. And now we would appeal to you. Are you walking with God so

perfectly that by that righteousness you can be justified? Has there

been no neglect, no languor, no forgetfulness, no sloth in his service?

Has the whole life been like the vigorous, active, cheerful, service of

the angels around the throne? Or, to go farther: is there any one hour

that you have passed from the moment of your new birth till now, upon the

perfect holiness of which you would dare to stake your salvation

throughout eternity? Select the time of greatest spiritual enjoyment,

the happy season when your soul glowed most fervently with the love of

Jesus; when Heaven seemed the nearest, and God rose before you as the

loveliest of the lovely; and decide whether you can truly say “For that

time at least I did fully, completely, and without defect, rise to the

measure of the perfect will of God.” How then can Rome declare that we

are justified by the righteousness within us? How can she presume to

curse those who differ from her sentence? How can she say “If any man

say, that we are justified by the sole imputation of Christ’s

righteousness, or by the sole remission of our sins, and not by an

inherent grace diffused in our hearts by the Holy Ghost; let him be

anathema?” Who is there either in Rome or England that can have any

hope, but in free, simple, unfettered mercy—that can have any plea before

the throne of God but that of the poor publican, who said “Lord be

merciful to me a sinner?” {30}

Sermons on the Scriptural Principles of our Protestant Church · 第 12 / 33 题