You have heard the account of these territories as they stood in 1782.

You have seen the _actual_ receipt since the assignment in 1781, of

which I reckon about two years and a quarter productive. I have stated

to you the expectation from the wasted part. For realizing all this you

may value yourselves on the vigor and diligence of a governor and

committee that have done so much. If these hopes from the committee are

rational, remember that the committee is no more. Your ministers, who

have formed their fund for these debts on the presumed effect of the

committee's management, have put a complete end to that committee. Their

acts are rescinded; their leases are broken; their renters are

dispersed. Your ministers knew, when they signed the death-warrant of

the Carnatic, that the Nabob would not only turn all these unfortunate

farmers of revenue out of employment, but that he has denounced his

severest vengeance against them, for acting under British authority.

With a knowledge of this disposition, a British Chancellor of the

Exchequer and Treasurer of the Navy, incited by no public advantage,

impelled by no public necessity, in a strain of the most wanton perfidy

which has ever stained the annals of mankind, have delivered over to

plunder, imprisonment, exile, and death itself, according to the mercy

of such execrable tyrants as Amir-ul-Omrah and Paul Benfield, the

unhappy and deluded souls who, untaught by uniform example, were still

weak enough to put their trust in English faith.[44] They have gone

farther: they have thought proper to mock and outrage their misery by

ordering them protection and compensation. From what power is this

protection to be derived, and from what fund is this compensation to

arise? The revenues are delivered over to their oppressor; the

territorial jurisdiction, from whence that revenue is to arise, and

under which they live, is surrendered to the same iron hands: and that

they shall be deprived of all refuge and all hope, the minister has made

a solemn, voluntary declaration that he never will interfere with the

Nabob's internal government.[45]

The last thing considered by the Board of Control among the debts of the

Carnatic was that arising to the East India Company, which, after the

provision for the cavalry, and the consolidation of 1777, was to divide

the residue of the fund of 480,000_l._ a year with the lenders of 1767.

This debt the worthy chairman, who sits opposite to me, contends to be

three millions sterling. Lord Macartney's account of 1781 states it to

be at that period 1,200,000_l._ The first account of the Court of

Directors makes it 900,000_l._ This, like the private debt, being

without any solid existence, is incapable of any distinct limits.

Whatever its amount or its validity may be, one thing is clear: it is of

the nature and quality of a public debt. In that light nothing is

provided for it, but an eventual surplus to be divided with one class

of the private demands, after satisfying the two first classes. Never

was a more shameful postponing a public demand, which, by the reason of

the thing, and the uniform practice of all nations, supersedes every

private claim.

Those who gave this preference to private claims consider the Company's

as a lawful demand; else why did they pretend to provide for it? On

their own principles they are condemned.

But I, Sir, who profess to speak to your understanding and to your

conscience, and to brush away from this business all false colors, all

false appellations, as well as false facts, do positively deny that the

Carnatic owes a shilling to the Company,--whatever the Company may be

indebted to that undone country. It owes nothing to the Company, for

this plain and simple reason: the territory charged with the debt is

their own. To say that their revenues fall short, and owe them money, is

to say they are in debt to themselves, which is only talking nonsense.

The fact is, that, by the invasion of an enemy, and the ruin of the

country, the Company, either in its own name, or in the names of the

Nabob of Arcot and Rajah of Tanjore, has lost for several years what it

might have looked to receive from its own estate. If men were allowed to

credit themselves upon such principles, any one might soon grow rich by

this mode of accounting. A flood comes down upon a man's estate in the

Bedford Level of a thousand pounds a year, and drowns his rents for ten

years. The Chancellor would put that man into the hands of a trustee,

who would gravely make up his books, and for this loss credit himself in

his account for a debt due to him of 10,000_l._ It is, however, on this

principle the Company makes up its demands on the Carnatic. In peace

they go the full length, and indeed more than the full length, of what

the people can bear for current establishments; then they are absurd

enough to consolidate all the calamities of war into debts,--to

metamorphose the devastations of the country into demands upon its

future production. What is this but to avow a resolution utterly to

destroy their own country, and to force the people to pay for their

sufferings to a government which has proved unable to protect either the

share of the husbandman or their own? In every lease of a farm, the

invasion of an enemy, instead of forming a demand for arrear, is a

release of rent: nor for that release is it at all necessary to show

that the invasion has left nothing to the occupier of the soil; though

in the present case it would be too easy to prove that melancholy

fact.[46] I therefore applauded my right honorable friend, who, when he

canvassed the Company's accounts, as a preliminary to a bill that ought

not to stand on falsehood of any kind, fixed his discerning eye and his

deciding hand on these debts of the Company from the Nabob of Arcot and

Rajah of Tanjore, and at one stroke expunged them all, as utterly

irrecoverable: he might have added, as utterly unfounded.

On these grounds I do not blame the arrangement this day in question, as

a preference given to the debt of individuals over the Company's debt.

In my eye it is no more than the preference of a fiction over a chimera;

but I blame the preference given to those fictitious private debts over

the standing defence and the standing government. It is there the public

is robbed. It is robbed in its army; it is robbed in its civil

administration; it is robbed in its credit; it is robbed in its

investment, which forms the commercial connection between that country

and Europe. There is the robbery.

But my principal objection lies a good deal deeper. That debt to the

Company is the pretext under which all the other debts lurk and cover

themselves. That debt forms the foul, putrid mucus in which are

engendered the whole brood of creeping ascarides, all the endless

involutions, the eternal knot, added to a knot of those inexpugnable

tape-worms which devour the nutriment and eat up the bowels of

India.[47] It is necessary, Sir, you should recollect two things. First,

that the Nabob's debt to the Company carries no interest. In the next

place, you will observe, that, whenever the Company has occasion to

borrow, she has always commanded whatever she thought fit at eight per

cent. Carrying in your mind these two facts, attend to the process with

regard to the public and private debt, and with what little appearance

of decency they play into each other's hands a game of utter perdition

to the unhappy natives of India. The Nabob falls into an arrear to the

Company. The Presidency presses for payment. The Nabob's answer is, "I

have no money." Good! But there are soucars who will supply you on the

mortgage of your territories. Then steps forward some Paul Benfield,

and, from his grateful compassion to the Nabob, and his filial regard

to the Company, he unlocks the treasures of his virtuous industry, and,

for a consideration of twenty-four or thirty-six per cent on a mortgage

of the territorial revenue, becomes security to the Company for the

Nabob's arrear.

All this intermediate usury thus becomes sanctified by the ultimate view

to the Company's payment. In this case, would not a plain man ask this

plain question of the Company: If you know that the Nabob must annually

mortgage his territories to your servants to pay his annual arrear to

you, why is not the assignment or mortgage made directly to the Company

itself? By this simple, obvious operation, the Company would be relieved

and the debt paid, without the charge of a shilling interest to that

prince. But if that course should be thought too indulgent, why do they

not take that assignment with such interest to themselves as they pay to

others, that is, eight per cent? Or if it were thought more advisable

(why it should I know not) that he must borrow, why do not the Company

lend their own credit to the Nabob for their own payment? That credit

would not be weakened by the collateral security of his territorial

mortgage. The money might still be had at eight per cent. Instead of any

of these honest and obvious methods, the Company has for years kept up a

show of disinterestedness and moderation, by suffering a debt to

accumulate to them from the country powers without any interest at all;

and at the same time have seen before their eyes, on a pretext of

borrowing to pay that debt, the revenues of the country charged with an

usury of twenty, twenty-four, thirty-six, and even eight-and-forty per

cent, with compound interest,[48] for the benefit of their servants. All

this time they know that by having a debt subsisting without any

interest, which is to be paid by contracting a debt on the highest

interest, they manifestly render it necessary to the Nabob of Arcot to

give the private demand a preference to the public; and, by binding him

and their servants together in a common cause, they enable him to form a

party to the utter ruin of their own authority and their own affairs.

Thus their false moderation, and their affected purity, by the natural

operation of everything false and everything affected, becomes pander

and bawd to the unbridled debauchery and licentious lewdness of usury

and extortion.

In consequence of this double game, all the territorial revenues have at

one time or other been covered by those locusts, the English soucars.

Not one single foot of the Carnatic has escaped them: a territory as

large as England. During these operations what a scene has that country

presented![49] The usurious European assignee supersedes the Nabob's

native farmer of the revenue; the farmer flies to the Nabob's presence

to claim his bargain; whilst his servants murmur for wages, and his

soldiers mutiny for pay. The mortgage to the European assignee is then

resumed, and the native farmer replaced,--replaced, again to be removed

on the new clamor of the European assignee.[50] Every man of rank and

landed fortune being long since extinguished, the remaining miserable

last cultivator, who grows to the soil, after having his back scored by

the farmer, has it again flayed by the whip of the assignee, and is

thus, by a ravenous, because a short-lived succession of claimants,

lashed from oppressor to oppressor, whilst a single drop of blood is

left as the means of extorting a single grain of corn. Do not think I

paint. Far, very far, from it: I do not reach the fact, nor approach to

it. Men of respectable condition, men equal to your substantial English

yeomen, are daily tied up and scourged to answer the multiplied demands

of various contending and contradictory titles, all issuing from one and

the same source. Tyrannous exaction brings on servile concealment; and

that again calls forth tyrannous coercion. They move in a circle,

mutually producing and produced; till at length nothing of humanity is

left in the government, no trace of integrity, spirit, or manliness in

the people, who drag out a precarious and degraded existence under this

system of outrage upon human nature. Such is the effect of the

establishment of a debt to the Company, as it has hitherto been managed,

and as it ever will remain, until ideas are adopted totally different

from those which prevail at this time.

Your worthy ministers, supporting what they are obliged to condemn, have

thought fit to renew the Company's old order against contracting private

debts in future. They begin by rewarding the violation of the ancient

law; and then they gravely reenact provisions, of which they have given

bounties for the breach. This inconsistency has been well exposed.[51]

But what will you say to their having gone the length of giving positive

directions for contracting the debt which they positively forbid?

I will explain myself. They order the Nabob, out of the revenues of the

Carnatic, to allot four hundred and eighty thousand pounds a year, as a

fund for the debts before us. For the punctual payment of this annuity,

they order him to give soucar security.[52] When a soucar, that is, a

money-dealer, becomes security for any native prince, the course is for

the native prince to counter-secure the money-dealer, by making over to

him in mortgage a portion of his territory equal to the sum annually to

be paid, with an interest of at least twenty-four per cent. The point

fit for the House to know is, who are these soucars to whom this

security on the revenues in favor of the Nabob's creditors is to be

given? The majority of the House, unaccustomed to these transactions,

will hear with astonishment that these soucars are no other than the

creditors themselves. The minister, not content with authorizing these

transactions in a manner and to an extent unhoped for by the rapacious

expectations of usury itself, loads the broken back of the Indian

revenues, in favor of his worthy friends, the soucars, with an

additional twenty-four per cent for being security to themselves for

their own claims, for condescending to take the country in mortgage to

pay to themselves the fruits of their own extortions.

The interest to be paid for this security, according to the most

moderate strain of soucar demand, comes to 118,000_l._ a year, which,

added to the 480,000_l._ on which it is to accrue, will make the whole

charge amount to 598,000_l._ a year,--as much as even a long peace will

enable those revenues to produce. Can any one reflect for a moment on

all those claims of debt, which the minister exhausts himself in

contrivances to augment with new usuries, without lifting up his hands

and eyes in astonishment at the impudence both of the claim and of the

adjudication? Services of some kind or other these servants of the

Company must have done, so great and eminent that the Chancellor of the

Exchequer cannot think that all they have brought home is half enough.

He hallooes after them, "Gentlemen, you have forgot a large packet

behind you, in your hurry; you have not sufficiently recovered

yourselves; you ought to have, and you shall have, interest upon

interest upon a prohibited debt that is made up of interest upon

interest. Even this is too little. I have thought of another character

for you, by which you may add something to your gains: you shall be

security to yourselves; and hence will arise a new usury, which shall

efface the memory of all the usuries suggested to you by your own dull

inventions."

I have done with the arrangement relative to the Carnatic. After this it

is to little purpose to observe on what the ministers have done to

Tanjore. Your ministers have not observed even form and ceremony in

their outrageous and insulting robbery of that country, whose only crime

has been its early and constant adherence to the power of this, and the

suffering of an uniform pillage in consequence of it. The debt of the

Company from the Rajah of Tanjore is just of the same stuff with that of

the Nabob of Arcot.

The subsidy from Tanjore, on the arrear of which this pretended debt (if

any there be) has accrued to the Company, is not, like that paid by the

Nabob of Arcot, a compensation for vast countries obtained, augmented,

and preserved for him; not the price of pillaged treasuries, ransacked

houses, and plundered territories: it is a large grant, from a small

kingdom not obtained by our arms; robbed, not protected, by our power; a

grant for which no equivalent was ever given, or pretended to be given.

The right honorable gentleman, however, bears witness in his reports to

the punctuality of the payments of this grant of bounty, or, if you

please, of fear. It amounts to one hundred and sixty thousand pounds

sterling net annual subsidy. He bears witness to a further grant of a

town and port, with an annexed district of thirty thousand pound a year,

surrendered to the Company since the first donation. He has not borne

witness, but the fact is, (he will not deny it,) that in the midst of

war, and during the ruin and desolation of a considerable part of his

territories, this prince made many very large payments. Notwithstanding

these merits and services, the first regulation of ministry is to force

from him a territory of an extent which they have not yet thought proper

to ascertain,[53] for a military peace establishment the particulars of

which they have not yet been pleased to settle.

The next part of their arrangement is with regard to war. As confessedly

this prince had no share in stirring up any of the former wars, so all

future wars are completely out of his power; for he has no troops

whatever, and is under a stipulation not so much as to correspond with

any foreign state, except through the Company. Yet, in case the

Company's servants should be again involved in war, or should think

proper again to provoke any enemy, as in times past they have wantonly

provoked all India, he is to be subjected to a new penalty. To what

penalty? Why, to no less than the confiscation of all his revenues. But

this is to end with the war, and they are to be faithfully returned? Oh,

no! nothing like it. The country is to remain under confiscation until

all the debt which the Company shall think fit to incur in such war

shall be discharged: that is to say, forever. His sole comfort is, to

find his old enemy, the Nabob of Arcot, placed in the very same

condition.

The revenues of that miserable country were, before the invasion of

Hyder, reduced to a _gross_ annual receipt of three hundred and sixty

thousand pound.[54] From this receipt the subsidy I have just stated is

taken. This again, by payments in advance, by extorting deposits of

additional sums to a vast amount for the benefit of their soucars, and

by an endless variety of other extortions, public and private, is loaded

with a debt, the amount of which I never could ascertain, but which is

large undoubtedly, generating an usury the most completely ruinous that

probably was ever heard of: _that is, forty-eight per cent, payable

monthly, with compound interest_.[55]

Such is the state to which the Company's servants have reduced that

country. Now come the reformers, restorers, and comforters of India.

What have they done? In addition to all these tyrannous exactions, with

all these ruinous debts in their train, looking to one side of an

agreement whilst they wilfully shut their eyes to the other, they

withdraw from Tanjore all the benefits of the treaty of 1762, and they

subject that nation to a perpetual tribute of forty thousand a year to

the Nabob of Arcot: a tribute never due, or pretended to be due, to

_him_, even when he appeared to be something; a tribute, as things now

stand, not to a real potentate, but to a shadow, a dream, an incubus of

oppression. After the Company has accepted in subsidy, in grant of

territory, in remission of rent, as a compensation for their own

protection, at least two hundred thousand pound a year, without

discounting a shilling for that receipt, the ministers condemn this

harassed nation to be tributary to a person who is himself, by their own

arrangement, deprived of the right of war or peace, deprived of the

power of the sword, forbid to keep up a single regiment of soldiers, and

is therefore wholly disabled from all protection of the country which is

the object of the pretended tribute. Tribute hangs on the sword. It is

an incident inseparable from real, sovereign power. In the present case,

to suppose its existence is as absurd as it is cruel and oppressive. And

here, Mr. Speaker, you have a clear exemplification of the use of those

false names and false colors which the gentlemen who have lately taken

possession of India choose to lay on for the purpose of disguising their

plan of oppression. The Nabob of Arcot and Rajah of Tanjore have, in

truth and substance, no more than a merely civil authority, held in the

most entire dependence on the Company. The Nabob, without military,

without federal capacity, is extinguished as a potentate; but then he is

carefully kept alive as an independent and sovereign power, for the

purpose of rapine and extortion,--for the purpose of perpetuating the

old intrigues, animosities, usuries, and corruptions.

It was not enough that this mockery of tribute was to be continued

without the correspondent protection, or any of the stipulated

equivalents, but ten years of arrear, to the amount of 400,000_l._

sterling, is added to all the debts to the Company and to individuals,

in order to create a new debt, to be paid (if at all possible to be paid

in whole or in part) only by new usuries,--and all this for the Nabob of

Arcot, or rather for Mr. Benfield and the corps of the Nabob's creditors

and their soucars. Thus these miserable Indian princes are continued in

their seats for no other purpose than to render them, in the first

instance, objects of every species of extortion, and, in the second, to

force them to become, for the sake of a momentary shadow of reduced

authority, a sort of subordinate tyrants, the ruin and calamity, not the

fathers and cherishers, of their people.

The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke, Vol. 03 (of 12) · 第 5 / 39 段