Great alterations are now (1899) being carried out; the old buildings—as

above referred to by Mr. Pip—have been demolished, and a new and better

arrangement of the locality is in active progress for the improvement of

the neighbourhood.

On the opposite side of Holborn are the handsome and extensive offices of

THE PRUDENTIAL ASSURANCE COMPANY. These premises, with their frontage,

occupy the site of FURNIVAL’S INN, which has recently disappeared, having

been pulled down to make room for the extension of the Assurance offices

above referred to—_Sic transit memoria mundi_.

Furnival’s Inn was an interesting locality, as associated with the

earlier experience of Mr. Dickens himself. Here the young author resided

in 1835, the year previous to the production of the “Pickwick Papers,”

the first number of that work being published April 1, 1836. On the day

following that notable date, Mr. Dickens married Miss Catherine Hogarth;

and for some time the young couple resided on the third floor apartments

at _No._ 15 _Furnival’s Inn_—on the right side of the square. A personal

reminiscence of these early days is no doubt intended in chapter 59 of

“David Copperfield;” a pleasant description being there given of the

residential chambers of Mr. and Mrs. Traddles, as located in Gray’s Inn

just beyond.

_Mr. John Westlock_ had his bachelor apartments in this same place at

Furnival’s Inn (_vide_ “Martin Chuzzlewit”), and here he received the

unexpected visit of Tom Pinch on his first arrival in London. We may

remember the incidents of that cordial welcome, when

“John was constantly running backwards and forwards to and from the

closet, bringing out all sorts of things in pots, scooping

extraordinary quantities of tea out of the caddy, dropping French

rolls into his boots, pouring hot water over the butter, and making a

variety of similar mistakes, without disconcerting himself in the

least.”

In the centre of the interior square, standing within the precincts of

Furnival’s Inn during the past seventy-five years, and flourishing in

recent days—a quiet oasis of retirement and good cheer amidst the bustle

and noise of central London—there existed (until 1895) Woods’ Hotel.

This hotel was associated with “The Mystery of Edwin Drood,” being the

house at which Mr. Grewgious found accommodation for the charming Rosa

Budd (on the occasion of her flight from the importunities of Jasper at

Cloisterham), including an “unlimited head chambermaid” for her special

behoof and benefit.

“Rosa’s room was airy, clean, comfortable, almost gay. The Unlimited

had laid in everything omitted from the very little bag (that is to

say, everything she could possibly need), and Rosa tripped down the

great many stairs again, to thank her guardian for his thoughtful and

affectionate care of her.

“‘Not at all, my dear,’ said Mr. Grewgious, infinitely gratified; ‘it

is I who thank you for your charming confidence and for your charming

company. Your breakfast will be provided for you in a neat, compact,

and graceful little sitting-room (appropriate to your figure), and I

will come to you at ten o’clock in the morning. I hope you don’t

feel very strange indeed, in this strange place.’

“‘Oh no, I feel so safe!’

“‘Yes, you may be sure that the stairs are fire-proof,’ said Mr.

Grewgious, ‘and that any outbreak of the devouring element would be

perceived and suppressed by the watchmen.’

“‘I did not mean that,’ Rosa replied. ‘I mean, I feel so safe from

him.’

“‘There is a stout gate of iron bars to keep him out,’ said Mr.

Grewgious smiling; ‘and Furnival’s is fire-proof, and specially

watched and lighted, and _I_ live over the way!’ In the stoutness of

his knight-errantry, he seemed to think the last-named protection

all-sufficient. In the same spirit he said to the gate-porter as he

went out, ‘If some one staying in the hotel should wish to send

across the road to me in the night, a crown will be ready for the

messenger.’ In the same spirit, he walked up and down outside the

iron gate for the best part of an hour, with some solicitude;

occasionally looking in between the bars, as if he had laid a dove in

a high roost in a cage of lions, and had it on his mind that she

might tumble out.”

The Hotel was originally built 1818–19, and was enlarged as recently as

1884. Woods was the proprietor for fifty years.

Crossing to the other side of the street, at a short distance onwards,

opposite Gray’s Inn Road, the Rambler reaches (by No. 334 High Holborn)

the gateway of Staple Inn; a little nook, composed of two irregular

quadrangles behind the most ancient part of Holborn, where certain gabled

houses, some centuries of age, still stand looking on the public way.

Staple Inn was the favourite summer promenade of the meditative _Mr.

Snagsby_ (see “Bleak House”); and in this Inn _Mr. Grewgious_ occupied a

set of chambers. The house is No. 10, in the inner quadrangle,

“presenting in black and white, over its ugly portal, the mysterious

inscription, ‘P. J. T., 1747.’ Perhaps John Thomas, or Perhaps Joe

Tyler.” And, under certain social conditions, “for a certainty, P. J. T.

was Pretty Jolly Too.” _Neville Landless_ also had rooms in this

locality; the top set in the corner (on the right), overlooking the

garden “where a few smoky sparrows twitter in the smoky trees, as though

they had called to each other, ‘let us play at country.’” Close to these

lived _Mr. Tartar_, in “the neatest, the cleanest, and the best-ordered

chambers ever seen under the sun, moon, and stars.” And we may recall

the writer’s delicate treatment of this, the blushing “beanstalk country”

of dear little Rosa Budd. For the several associations herewith

connected, reference should be made to our author’s last book, “The

Mystery of Edwin Drood.”—See concluding paragraphs of chapter 21:—

“Rosa wondered what the girls would say if they could see her

crossing the wide street on the sailor’s arm. And she fancied that

the passers-by must think her very little and very helpless,

contrasted with the strong figure that could have caught her up and

carried her out of any danger, miles and miles without resting.

“She was thinking further, that his far-seeing blue eyes looked as if

they had been used to watch danger afar off, and to watch it without

flinching, drawing nearer and nearer: when, happening to raise her

own eyes, she found that he seemed to be thinking something about

_them_.

“This a little confused Rosebud, and may account for her never

afterwards quite knowing how she ascended (with his help) to his

garden in the air, and seemed to get into a marvellous country that

came into sudden bloom like the country on the summit of the magic

bean-stalk. May it flourish for ever!”

[Picture: Doorway in Staple Inn]

In this connection, the reader may be interested in chapter 22; the first

part of which deals most tenderly and beautifully with “love’s awaking,”

in the heart of the innocent heroine.

Recrossing to the other side of High Holborn, past _Gray’s Inn Road_ (on

the north), at No. 22, we reach the gateway of GRAY’S INN. At No. 2

South Square (formerly Holborn Court) we may find the upper chambers

formerly occupied by _Mr. Traddles_ and his wife _Sophy_, whose domestic

arrangements included accommodation for “the beauty” and the other

Devonshire sisters. Copperfield says, in the chapter before referred

to:—

“If I had beheld a thousand roses blowing in a top set of chambers,

in that withered Gray’s Inn, they could not have brightened it half

so much. The idea of those Devonshire girls, among the dry

law-stationers, and the attorneys’ offices; and of the tea and toast,

and children’s songs, in that grim atmosphere of pounce and

parchment, red-tape, dusty wafers, ink-jars, brief and draft paper,

law reports, writs, declarations, and bills of costs, seemed almost

as pleasantly fanciful as if I had dreamed that the Sultan’s famous

family had been admitted on the roll of attorneys, and had brought

the talking-bird, the singing-tree, and the Golden water into Gray’s

Inn Hall.”

The offices of _Mr. Perker_, the legal adviser of Mr. Pickwick, were also

located in Gray’s Inn. We read that the “outer door” of these chambers

was to be found “after climbing two pairs of steep and dirty stairs;” but

no indication is given of their exact situation.

Proceeding westward from Gray’s Inn, and passing the stately, elegant,

and commodious _First Avenue Hotel_, between Warwick Court and Brownlow

Street, and a half-a-dozen side streets beyond, we come, on the north

side, at No. 92, to the Bull and Anchor Tavern. This is the house known

in the pages of “Martin Chuzzlewit” as “_The Bull Inn_,” then a more

important hostelry than at present. It will be remembered as the inn at

which Mr. Lewsome, during his illness, was professionally attended by

_Sairey Gamp_ and _Betsy Prig_, “turn and turn about.”

Passing on to the next turning but one, we reach Kingsgate Street, where

_Poll Sweedlepipes_—barber and bird-fancier—once had his business

location, “next door but one to the celebrated mutton-pie shop, and

directly opposite the original cat’s-meat warehouse.” At this place the

immortal _Mrs. Gamp_ had lodgings on the first floor, where she

“Was easily assailed at night by pebbles, walking-sticks, and

fragments of tobacco pipes, all much more efficacious than the

street-door knocker, which was so constructed as to wake the street

with ease, and even spread alarms of fire in Holborn, without making

the smallest impression on the premises to which it was addressed.”

It is recollected in the neighbourhood that, fifty years since, a barber

by the name of Patterson (who was also a bird-dealer) lived in this

street, at the second house on the left. The shop has been pulled down,

is now absorbed by the corner premises in Holborn, and can be only

identified by its position. Here, then, did _Mr. Pecksniff_ arrive on

his doleful mission, in accordance with the recommendation of _Mr.

Mould_, the undertaker, with regard to the death of old _Anthony

Chuzzlewit_; and here did that memorable teapot cause a lasting

difference between two friends, as narrated in chapter 49 of “Martin

Chuzzlewit.” “This world-famous personage, Mrs. Gamp, has passed into

and become one with the language” whose vernacular she has adorned with

her own flowers of speech. As Mr. Forster remarks, “she will remain

among the everlasting triumphs of fiction, a superb masterpiece of

English humour.” “Age cannot wither her, nor custom stale, her infinite

variety.” At the Holborn corner of Kingsgate Street we may remember _Mr.

Bailey_, _junior_, on the occasion when, at this exact spot, he collided

with Poll Sweedlepipes, afterwards going “round and round in circles on

the pavement,” the better to exhibit to Poll’s admiring gaze his

fashionable livery as Tiger in the service of _Mr. Montague Tigg_,

“rather to the inconvenience of the passengers generally, who were not in

an equal state of spirits with himself.”

The next turning but one, westward, on the right, by the West Central

Post Office (No. 126), is Southampton Street, leading to Bloomsbury

Square.

Here it will be remembered that lodgings were taken by Mr. Grewgious for

_Miss Twinkleton_ and Rosa, of the redoubtable _Mrs. Billickin_, “the

person of the ’ouse,” who, from prudential motives, suppressed her

Christian name.

“Mr. Grewgious had his agreement-lines and his earnest-money ready.

‘I have signed it for the ladies, ma’am,’ he said, ‘and you’ll have

the goodness to sign it for yourself, Christian and Surname, there,

if you please.’

“‘Mr. Grewgious,’ said Mrs. Billickin in a new burst of candour, ‘no,

sir! You must excuse the Christian name.’

“Mr. Grewgious stared at her.

“‘The door-plate is used as a protection,’ said Mrs. Billickin, ‘and

acts as such, and go from it I will not.’

“Mr. Grewgious stared at Rosa.

“‘No, Mr. Grewgious, you must excuse me. So long as this ’ouse is

known indefinite as Billickin’s, and so long as it is a doubt with

the riff-raff where Billickin may be hidin’, near the street-door or

down the airy, and what his weight and size, so long I feel safe.

But commit myself to a solitary female statement, no, Miss! Nor

would you for a moment wish,’ said Mrs. Billickin, with a strong

sense of injury, ‘to take that advantage of your sex, if you were not

brought to it by inconsiderate example.’

“Rosa reddening as if she had made some most disgraceful attempt to

overreach the good lady, besought Mr. Grewgious to rest content with

any signature. And accordingly, in a baronial way, the sign-manual

BILLICKIN got appended to the document.”

And we may here recall the incidental passage of arms between the worthy

landlady and Miss Twinkleton, Mrs. B. being always in direct antagonism

with the schoolmistress, against whom she “openly pitted herself as one

whom she fully ascertained to be her natural enemy.” Witness “the B.

enveloped in the shawl of State,” as she remarked to Miss Twinkleton that

“‘A rush from scanty feeding to generous feeding, from what you may

call messing to what you may call method, do require a power of

constitution, which is not often found in youth, particular when

undermined by boarding-school. . . . I was put in youth to a very

genteel boarding-school, the mistress being no less a lady than

yourself, of about your own age, or it may be some years younger, and

a poorness of blood flowed from the table, which has run through my

life.’

* * * * *

“‘If you refer to the poverty of your circulation,’ began Miss

Twinkleton, when again the Billickin neatly stopped her.

“‘I have used no such expressions.’

“‘If you refer, then, to the poorness of your blood—’

“‘Brought upon me,’ stipulated the Billickin, expressly, ‘at a

boarding-school—’

“‘Then,’ resumed Miss Twinkleton, ‘all I can say is, that I am bound

to believe, on your asseveration, that it is very poor indeed. I

cannot forbear adding, that if that unfortunate circumstance

influences your conversation, it is much to be lamented, and it is

eminently desirable that your blood were richer.’”

Southampton Street is not a long one, and is now chiefly occupied by

solicitors and architects; but there is reason to believe that the

Billickins’ residence was, aforetime, to be found at No. 18, which is

situated next door but one to an archway. As Mrs. B. herself candidly

pointed out,

“The arching leads to a mews; mewses must exist.”

The mews aforesaid is now superseded by a factory. Mrs. Billickin has

long since relinquished the cares of housekeeping and retired from public

life. The present amiable landlady conducts the business on different

principles, and will be at all times disposed to give her patrons

satisfaction, whether they be of the scholastic persuasion or otherwise.

Southampton Street leads immediately northward into Bloomsbury Square.

This place is mentioned in “Barnaby Rudge” as the locality in which _Lord

Mansfield’s_ residence was situated at the period of the Gordon Riots.

In chapter 66 its destruction by the rioters is thus described:—

“They began to demolish the house with great fury; and setting fire

to it in several places, involved in a common ruin the whole of the

costly furniture, the plate and jewels, a beautiful gallery of

pictures, the rarest collection of manuscripts ever possessed by any

one private person in the world, and, worst of all, because nothing

could replace the loss, the great Law Library, on almost every page

of which were notes, in the judge’s own hand, of inestimable value;

being the results of the study and experience of his whole life.”

[Picture: The Children’s Hospital]

The house occupied the site of No. 29, on the east side of the square.

We subsequently read in the same book that two of the

rioters—cripples—were hanged in this square, the execution being

momentarily delayed, as they were placed facing the house they had

assisted to despoil. Leaving the square at its north-east angle (right)

by _Bloomsbury Place_, the Rambler shortly comes into _Southampton Row_,

turning left, and proceeding for a short distance upwards to _Cosmo

Place_ on the right, a short cut which leads directly to the contiguous

shades of Queen Square just beyond. It will be remembered that in this

neighbourhood Richard Carstone had furnished apartments at the time when

he was pursuing the experimental study of the Law under the auspices of

Messrs. Kenge and Carboy (see “Bleak House,” chapter 18). There is

reason to believe that the “quiet old” house intended was No. 28

_Devonshire Street_, leading from the south-east angle of the square.

Leaving Queen Square by _Great Ormond Street_ (eastward), we immediately

arrive, on the north side (No. 50), at The Children’s Hospital, adjacent

to the Catholic Church and Convent of St. John. In 1858, February 9th, a

public dinner was arranged, by way of charitable appeal, for funds

necessary to carry on and develop the work. It was happily resolved to

invite Charles Dickens to preside on that occasion, and he “threw himself

into the service heart and soul.” His earnest, pathetic, but powerful

appeal—“majestic in its own simplicity”—that night added more than £3000

to the treasury, which amount was, two months afterwards, substantially

increased by the proceeds of a public reading of his “Christmas Carol.”

It is pleasant to record that this institution has ever since flourished

amain, thus fulfilling the prediction of Dickens when, suggesting that

the enterprise could not be possibly maintained unless the Hospital were

made better known, he continued as follows:—

“I limit myself to saying—better known, because I will not believe

that, in a Christian community of fathers and mothers, and brothers

and sisters, it can fail, being better known, to be well and richly

endowed.”

We may here recall the scene narrated in chapter 9 of “Our Mutual

Friend,” when _Johnny_ makes his will and arranges his affairs, leaving

“a kiss for the boofer lady”—

“The family whom God had brought together were not all asleep, but

were all quiet. From bed to bed, a light womanly tread and a

pleasant fresh face passed in the silence of the night. A little

head would lift itself into the softened light here and there, to be

kissed as the face went by—for these little patients are very

loving—and would then submit itself to be composed to rest again. . .

. Over most of the beds, the toys were yet grouped as the children

had left them when they last laid themselves down, and in their

innocent grotesqueness and incongruity they might have stood for the

children’s dreams.”

Proceeding eastward by _Great Ormond Street_ and turning (left) through

_Lamb’s Conduit Street_, to its northern end, we face the entrance of the

Foundling Hospital. This beneficent institution was established by

Captain Thomas Coram, about the middle of the last century, and is

associated with “No Thoroughfare,” the Christmas number (and last in the

series) of “All the Year Round,” 1867. Visitors attending the morning

service of the _Foundling Church_ on Sundays are admitted to the

children’s _Dining-Hall_ thereafter, and so may have an opportunity of

realising the scene portrayed by Dickens, when the “veiled lady” induced

a female attendant to point out Walter Wilding:—

“The bright autumnal sun strikes freshly into the wards; and the

heavy-framed windows through which it shines, and the panelled walls

on which it shines, are such windows, and such walls as pervade

Hogarth’s pictures. Neat attendants silently glide about the orderly

and silent tables, the lookers-on move or stop as the fancy takes

them; comments in whispers on face such a number, from such a window,

are not unfrequent—many of the faces are of a character to fix

attention. Some of the visitors from the outside public are

accustomed visitors. They have established a speaking acquaintance

with the occupants of particular seats at the table, and halt at

those points to say a word or two.”

In “Little Dorrit,” too, reference is made to this institution, _in re_

the adoption of Tattycoram by good Papa and Mamma Meagles. In the times

of Barnaby Rudge, the London streets were not greatly extended northward

beyond this (now central) neighbourhood. We may remember that the

headquarters of the “Captain,” Sim Tappertit, Hugh, and Dennis were at

The “Boot” Tavern, which is described as

“A lone place of public entertainment, situated in the fields at the

back of the Foundling Hospital; a very solitary spot at that period,

and quite deserted after dark. The Tavern stood at some distance

from any high road, and was only approachable by a dark and narrow

lane.”

Proceeding onwards through _Guilford Street_, we reach _Doughty Street_,

_Mecklenburgh Square_, running transversely north and south. On the east

side we may note No. 48 Doughty Street, as the house to which Dickens

removed from _Furnival’s Inn_, in the early spring of 1837, and in which

he lived two years and a half, previous to his longer residence at _No._

1 _Devonshire Terrace_. In it “Oliver Twist” and “Nicholas Nickleby”

were written; and here, too, the early friendship, which had been for

some time steadily developing between Dickens and Forster, became

cemented for life. His biographer says:—

“Nor had many weeks passed before he addressed to me from Doughty

Street, words which it is my sorrowful pride to remember have had

literal fulfilment. ‘I look back with unmingled pleasure to every

link which each ensuing week has added to the chain of our

attachment. It shall go hard, I hope, ere anything but death impairs

the toughness of a bond now so firmly riveted.’”

The route being retraced to the Foundling Hospital, and thence continued

through Guilford Street to _Russell __Square_, we turn (right) by _Woburn

Place_ to TAVISTOCK SQUARE, on the south side of which (TAVISTOCK VILLAS)

is situated Tavistock House. To this residence Dickens removed (from

DEVONSHIRE TERRACE) in October 1851, retaining its possession for nearly

ten years. During this time “Bleak House” was completed, and “Hard

Times,” “Little Dorrit,” and the “Tale of Two Cities” were given to the

world. TAVISTOCK HOUSE is now transformed into a Jewish College. _Hans

Christian Andersen_, visiting his friend in London, gives the following

description:—

“In Tavistock Square stands Tavistock House. This and the strip of

garden in front of it are shut out from the thoroughfare by an iron

railing. A large garden, with a grass plat and high trees, stretches

behind the house, and gives it a countrified look in the midst of

this coal and gas steaming London. In the passage from street to

garden hung pictures and engravings. Here stood a marble bust of

Dickens, so like him, so youthful and handsome; and over a bedroom

door were inserted the bas-reliefs of Night and Day, after

Thorwaldsen. On the first floor was a rich library, with a fireplace

and a writing-table, looking out on the garden; and here it was that

in winter Dickens and his friends acted plays to the satisfaction of

all parties. The kitchen was underground, and at the top of the

house were the bedrooms.”

[Picture: Tavistock House]

Leaving this locality at the north-west angle, passing _Gordon Square_,

we turn (right) into _Gordon Street_, and (left) through _Gower Place_,

to GOWER STREET, on the west side of which—opposite—is the house once

bearing a large brass plate on the door, announcing Mrs. Dickens’s

Establishment, being the place at which Mrs. Dickens (mother of Charles)

endeavoured to set up a school during the difficult times of 1822. The

family lived here for a short time, previous to the Marshalsea

imprisonment of Dickens senior; Charles being then a boy ten years of

age. In the first chapter of Forster’s Biography is the following:—

Rambles in Dickens' Land · 第 5 / 15 段