A former lover, Constantine Artoclinas, then became the object of her

matrimonial designs. But he already had a wife, who was not of the

self-sacrificing disposition of the wife of Romanus. As soon as she

heard of the honor to which Zoe destined her husband, Constantine

Artoclinas fell ill and did not long survive. It was the general opinion

that his wife had poisoned him, either through jealousy of Zoe, or

because she felt an aversion to passing the rest of her days in a

convent. Zoe, however, was readily consoled.

She again selected an old admirer, Constantine Monomachus, whom Michael

IV. had banished to Mitylene because of his attentions to the empress,

but who had been recalled on the accession of Zoe and Theodora and

appointed to a high official position in Greece. An imperial galley was

despatched with a royal courier to notify him of the new dignity that

awaited him, and to bring him back to Constantinople. Upon his arrival

he was invested with the imperial robes. His marriage with Zoe was

performed by one of the clergy, for the patriarch Alexius declined to

officiate at the third marriage of the empress, which in this case was

doubly uncanonical, as both Zoe and Constantine had been twice married.

The choice made by Zoe is a sad commentary on the immorality of the age.

The life and character of Constantine X. show the utter lack of moral

principle which prevailed in the court circles. After he had buried two

wives, Constantine Monomachus had won the affections of a beautiful and

wealthy young widow called Sclerena, who openly became his mistress and

accompanied him in his exile to Mitylene. Yet, in the eyes of the

orthodox, her position as mistress was more respectable, as being less

uncanonical than if she had become his third wife. As Sclerena had stood

by him in the days of his adversity, Constantine insisted upon her

sharing with him his prosperity, and when he assumed the purple he

bargained with Zoe that he should retain his mistress, a condition to

which Zoe in her shamelessness agreed. Hence, "the people of

Constantinople were treated to the singular spectacle of an Emperor of

the Romans making his public appearance with two female companions

dignified with the title of Empress, one as his wife, the other as his

mistress."

Sclerena was officially saluted with the title of Augusta, and possessed

a rank equal to that of Theodora, whose relative importance had been

reduced by the advent of the Emperor Constantine X. She held a court of

her own and was installed in apartments of the imperial palace.

Owing to her beauty and her elegant manners she gathered about her a

brilliant court circle, which in its sumptuousness and ostentation

contrasted greatly with the dull ceremony and sombre atmosphere of the

apartments of the elderly sisters, Zoe and Theodora. Sclerena's

disposition, too, was amiable and winning, and she was admired for the

constancy with which she had clung to her lover in the days of his

misfortune. Constantine, in return for her self-sacrificing devotion

when he was an impoverished exile, sought to repay her by the most

lavish expenditure of the public funds. Her apartments were made the

most elegant and luxurious in the city, and her toilettes were the envy

of all the aristocratic ladies of Constantinople.

Though Constantine showed in every way his partiality for his mistress,

it did not disturb the domestic tranquillity of the imperial household.

Zoe and Sclerena lived on the best of terms, and the utter absence of

jealousy in the aged wife is less remarkable than her utter

shamelessness.

The moral feelings of the people, however, were not so completely

corrupted as those of their superiors. They resented the lavish

expenditures of the public moneys upon the concubine of the emperor, and

they also resented the insult thus put upon their empress. They felt

that the lives of the aged sisters, the only survivors of the Macedonian

house, could not be safe in a palace where vice reigned supreme, and

where secret murders had so often occurred.

The incensed populace raised a sedition on the feast of the Forty

Martyrs, when it became the duty of the emperor to walk in solemn

procession to the church of Our Saviour in Chalke, whence he proceeded

on horseback to the church of the Martyrs. As the procession was about

to move from the palace, a cry was raised: "Down with Sclerena; we will

not have her for empress! Zoe and Theodora are our mothers--we will not

allow them to be murdered!" The mob then sought to lay hands on the

emperor to tear him in pieces, but the tumult was quieted by the sudden

appearance of Zoe and Theodora on the balcony and the people were

dispersed without serious damage being done.

The Empress Zoe died in 1050, at the age of seventy. Constantine X.

survived to the year 1055. He, before the end came, was anxious to name

his successor, but as soon as Theodora heard of the attempt of her

brother-in-law to deprive her of the throne, she hastened to the palace,

where the Senate was quickly convened, and presented herself as the

lawful empress. With universal acclamation, Theodora was proclaimed sole

sovereign of the Empire.

Though seventy-five years of age when she became sole ruler of the

destinies of the Eastern Empire, Theodora exhibited great vigor of

character and her short reign was a fortunate period for the Byzantines,

owing to her attention to public business and the freedom from external

conflicts. To preserve power in her own hands, Theodora presided in

person at the meetings of the Cabinet and the Senate, and heard appeals

as supreme judge in civil cases. Her long monastic life had developed in

her the narrow views and acrimonious passions of a recluse, but an

ascetic spirit was a relief after the sensual performances of the court

of Constantinople. Even at the advanced age of seventy-six, Theodora

felt so robust that she looked forward to a long life. The monks

flattered her with prophecies that she was to reign for many years. But

in the midst of her plans, she was suddenly attacked by an intestinal

disorder that speedily brought her to the grave. Theodora was the last

scion of a family which had upheld with glory the institutions of the

Empire for nearly two centuries, and had secured to its subjects a

degree of internal tranquillity and commercial prosperity far greater

than that enjoyed during the same period by any other portion of the

human race. "And with her, expired the race of Basil, the Slavonian

groom, and the administrative glory of the Byzantine Empire, on the 30th

of August, 1057."

[Illustration 6: _BYZANTINE INTERIOR, NINTH CENTURY From a

water-color by S. Baron, after a restoration by P. Bénard.

In this period military exigencies did not permit of numerous

apartments. We find the great room, the place of reunion, a

sumptuously decorated apartment, in which also the meals were

served and the bed was placed. The floor was of bricks, and the

apartment was warmed by hot air supplied from a_ hypocaustum,

_placed below the floor, and admitted through a painted iron

grating. The wall decorations presented an infinite variety of

beautifully executed mouldings and scroll designs of flowers and

foliage, common to the Byzantine manner. The furniture of the

room was sober in style. The bed was shaped and ornamented

somewhat like a modern sofa. A curtain on sliding rings served

to screen from draughts, as well as to separate beds. In this

room the lady received her guests._]

What a contrast is offered between the empresses of these later

centuries and the great names of the earlier period, Eudoxia and

Pulcheria and Eudocia and the great Theodora! We have fallen on evil

times; and in the general corruption, woman has degenerated. During the

remaining centuries which it falls to our lot to consider, we shall find

that the chronicles of women continue to exhibit the downward march of

womanhood, until with the utter debasement of woman, the fabric of

society gives way, and all is darkness in the history of the sex.

We have had a glimpse of the luxury with which the Empress Eudoxia

surrounded herself in her palace on the Bosporus, and our curiosity and

interest may be satisfied concerning the domestic surroundings of a

woman of rank during the period of the Byzantine decadence. The only

truly original Christian art, down to the eleventh century, was the

Byzantine; it dominated both Christian and pagan artists. In the period

to which we refer, military exigencies did not permit of numerous

apartments. We find the great room, the place of reunion, a sumptuously

decorated apartment, in which also the meals were served and the bed was

placed.

This chief room showed little constructive quality, but it was superbly

decorated. The square, heavy door was usually contrived below a

relieving arch, whose archivolt was richly charged with sculptured and

painted ornaments; the twin windows were supported by a pied-droit or on

small columns. The flat walls rarely had a real projecting entablature;

the ends of joists were simulated by cornices resting on consoles or

modillions; the architrave and the frieze were only a painted effect.

The floor was of bricks. Chimneys were not yet used, and the apartment

was warmed by hot air supplied from a hypocaustum, placed within the

walls or below the floor, and admitted through a painted iron grating.

The wall decorations presented an infinite variety of beautifully

executed mouldings and scroll designs of flowers and foliage, common to

the Byzantine style. A prominent feature of the mural decoration was the

numerous figures, in stiff attitudes, draped with garments falling in

meagre folds, and decked with abundant fringes and precious stones,

after the Oriental fashion; close to these figures were placed groups of

Greek letters.

The furniture of the room was sober in style. The bed was shaped and

ornamented somewhat like a modern sofa. The occupant reclined rather

than lay on it, for the cushions were heaped up increasingly toward the

head of the bed. It was customary to sleep without garments, the only

covering being an ample sheet. A curtain on sliding rings was

indispensable; it served to screen from draughts, as well as to separate

beds; moreover, it supplemented the scanty furniture of the room.

Over the bed was a lighted lamp. This was invariably used, for darkness

was dreaded, and it was believed that the light kept off evil spirits

and prevented baleful apparitions. In this room the great lady of our

period received her guests; here intrigues were plotted; here she

partook of her repasts, waited upon by her many serving-maids; here she

passed, indeed, most of her life.

XIV

THE PRINCESSES OF THE COMNENI

With the end of the Macedonian house in 1057, all the elements of

discord in the Byzantine Empire seemed to have been loosed. Civil war

and foreign invasions rapidly succeeded one another, and the empire

hastened to its doom. But the downward progress was for a time checked

by the rise of the Comneni, a prominent family, who controlled the

destinies and exerted a paramount influence over the career of the

Byzantine government for over a century, in fact, until its overthrow by

the Latin Crusaders in 1204. In the chronicles of the Comneni, its

princesses played a notable though not always creditable role; and the

undercurrent of Byzantine history for a century and a half was

determined largely by woman's influence and woman's artifice.

Of the great families whose names appear on every page of the Byzantine

history of the eleventh and twelfth centuries, that of the Comneni is by

far the most illustrious. The hypothesis that the Comneni were an

ancient Roman house which followed Constantine from Old Rome to New Rome

must be given up: so important an item in the family glories of the

house would not have been passed over in silence by Anna Comnena and her

husband in their historical works. We must accept the testimony of a

contemporary, Psellus, that the family was of Greek or Thracian origin,

and derived its name from the ancestral seat, the village of Comne in

the valley of the Torniga, near the site of the city of Adrianople.

The first of the line prominent in Byzantine annals was the illustrious

Manuel Comnenus, who, under Basil II., aided in settling the troubled

condition of the East and in reestablishing the Empire on a firm

footing. As a result of his labors for the state, Manuel acquired vast

estates in Cappadocia, and, from this time, his family ranked as one of

the wealthiest and most aristocratic houses of the Byzantine nobility.

Manuel, upon his deathbed, left his two sons, Isaac and John, to the

care and the gratitude of his sovereign. The two lads were carefully

educated in all the learning and trained in all the manly

accomplishments of the day; and their brotherly love became the subject

of comment in an age when self-seeking was the most salient

characteristic of the aristocratic class. When they attained manhood,

both made brilliant marriages which greatly increased the lustre of

their family name: Isaac married a captive princess of Bulgaria, and

John wedded Anna Dalassena, the daughter of the patrician Dalassenus,

nicknamed Charon from the number of enemies he had sent to the infernal

regions. Isaac was fated to die childless and his wife is unknown to

fame, but Anna, the wife of John, was destined to be the most remarkable

woman of her house.

The Empress Theodora, in her last days, had nominated Michael

VI.,--Stratioticus,--an aged and decrepit veteran, as her successor; but

his elevation was resented by the soldiers, who plotted and successfully

carried through a conspiracy by which Michael was dispossessed and Isaac

Comnenus, at that time the most popular general of the East, was

elevated to the throne. But the usurpation was not attended with the

blessings of heaven: Isaac was stricken with disease before he had

reigned a full year, and retired to a monastery to die, abdicating the

throne and selecting his brother John as his successor. For some

unaccountable reason, and much to the chagrin of his wife Anna, whose

ambitions were distinctly imperial, John declined the honor, and

persisted in his refusal in spite of the entreaties of his wife and

relatives, and with a seeming blindness to the welfare of the state.

Possibly he felt that a curse rested upon a dynasty which had usurped

the throne. Constantine Ducas, another Cappadocian patrician, was then

selected; during his reign of seven troubled years he proved himself to

be a sorry administrator. His empress, Eudocia Makremvolitissa, and Anna

Dalassena are the two dominating personalities who determined the tenor

of court intrigue and largely influenced the course of the events of

this period. Anna most intensely hated Ducas and all his house, for they

were occupying a throne which she thought should have been retained in

her own family; and her relations with the empress were those of rivalry

or of friendship, in proportion as Eudocia was acting in sympathy with

or in opposition to her husband's family.

Constantine XI.--Ducas--was as intensely partisan as Anna; and when he

found his end approaching, he wished above all things to assure the

elevation of his three children, Michael, Andronicus, and Constantine.

Constantine was well aware of the dangers which his dynasty would incur

should the empress marry a second time; before conferring upon her the

regency of the Empire, he therefore exacted from her a most solemnly

attested promise that under no circumstances would she take a second

husband. This important document was deposited in the hands of the

patriarch, John Xiphilinus. Constantine made the Senate, also, take an

oath never to acknowledge any other emperor than one of his own

children. Feeling that he had bound his wife by irretrievable bonds, and

that every precaution had been taken to assure the implicit fulfilment

of his wishes, Constantine breathed his last with a contented mind.

But Eudocia soon discovered the need of a strong arm for the protection

of her own rights and those of her sons. A woman of executive gifts, she

was also devoted to literary pursuits, and her knowledge of history had

taught her with how much reluctance the Byzantines submitted to the

sovereignty of a woman. She recalled, too, the experience of the Empress

Theophano, who had found prudent guardians for her sons, Basil II. and

Constantine IX., in the persons of the soldiers Nicephorus II. and John

I., though she was appalled by the vices of this empress, who had

married and murdered the first and been scorned by the second guardian.

Furthermore, threatening invasions and domestic unrest proved the need

of a soldier as her colleague in the Empire. Love came to the assistance

of reason, and Eudocia determined to break her vows and to take a second

husband.

Romanus Diogenes, the most daring and popular general of the Empire, had

been convicted of treason for participation in a conspiracy against her

children's throne, and was then in prison awaiting sentence of death

from Eudocia as regent. The latter, however, became enamored of her

distinguished captive, and his beauty and valor convinced her that he

was destined to share with her the throne. The army was clamoring for

his release; and when he received a full pardon from the empress-regent,

it at first created no suspicion of her romantic designs. The Seljukian

Turks were at that time overrunning Cappadocia and it was necessary that

the army should be under the control of an able and a daring general.

Romanus was therefore raised from the scaffold to the headship of the

army.

Before the empress could take any further step toward carrying out her

matrimonial intentions, it was necessary to secure possession of the

document which evidenced her pledge to her husband that she never would

contract a second marriage. Feminine diplomacy enabled her to accomplish

this delicate task; and the lack of principle and high moral character

in the patriarch caused him to fall readily into the net laid for him by

Eudocia.

Xiphilinus at first urged upon her emissary the sanctity of the oath the

empress had taken, and the sacred nature of the trust he had assumed;

but when it was whispered in his presence that his own brother was

destined for the high honor, the patriarch's scruples were relaxed, and

he yielded--out of proper regard, as he alleged, for the welfare of the

state. He resigned the important paper into the empress's hand, and at

her solicitation proposed and carried through a measure in the Senate,

favoring her second marriage, and in addition released the senators from

their vow never to recognize as emperor any other than a son of

Constantine. Great was the confusion of the credulous patriarch when he

realized that he had been outwitted by the clever woman, who, when her

plans were fully matured, made an official proclamation that she had

selected Romanus IV.,--Diogenes,--the most brilliant general of the

Empire, to share with her the throne and to act as guardian to her sons.

Her choice was the occasion of much satisfaction to the army and the

people, but caused jealousy and dissension in the imperial household.

John Ducas, the late emperor's brother, held the rank of Cæsar and was

the natural guardian of his nephews; he at once began to conspire for

the overthrow of Romanus and the retirement of Eudocia.

The new emperor at once assumed his duties of warding off the enemies of

the Empire, and engaged in a deadly conflict with the Seljukian Turks.

Though at first successful, his army was finally routed and almost

annihilated, and Romanus himself was taken captive, on the fatal field

of Manzikert, 1071,--a decisive battle that marked the beginning of the

end of Byzantine history and presaged the final conquest of

Constantinople by the Turks. Romanus's capture produced a revolution at

court. John Ducas seized the reins of government, ostensibly in the

interests of Michael VII., son of Constantine; and when Romanus, having

been released by his gallant foe, returned to Constantinople, Ducas had

him seized and blinded and left to die through neglect. Eudocia was

forced to retire to a monastery and take the veil; there she devoted

herself to literary labors. She is reputed to be the author of a learned

work, still extant, entitled Ionia, a species of historical and

mythological dictionary. The last public appearance of the hapless

Eudocia was on the occasion of the funeral of the valiant Romanus, which

she was permitted to celebrate in an imposing manner.

A period of anarchy followed the cruel death of Romanus, and there were

at one time no less than six pretenders to the throne. Throughout this

trying period John Ducas maintained his power as regent, relinquishing

his regency only when his ward, Michael VII., became of age and asserted

his rights. Michael was fortunate in the choice of his empress, Princess

Maria, daughter of the King of Iberia, whose beauty and grace are

celebrated by the historian Anna Comnena. When her husband was

overthrown and slain by the rebel Nicephorus Botaniates, Maria married

the latter, with the hope of securing the throne for her child and the

regency for herself. And from this time on her story is closely

interwoven with that of the Comneni princesses, to whom we now return.

John Comnenus died soon after Constantine Ducas, leaving to the widowed

Anna the task of bringing up a large family of eight children,--Manuel,

Isaac, Alexius, Adrian, Nicephorus, Maria, Eudocia, and Theodora. But

Anna was equal to the task, and deserves to be ranked among the great

mothers of the world. She gave herself up to the proper education of her

sons and daughters, and to the promotion of their political advancement.

She could never console herself for the loss of an imperial crown

through the weakness of her husband, and all her tireless energy was

directed toward recovering her lost opportunity and reaching the throne

through the elevation of one of her sons. What is recounted of her shows

that she was a woman of extraordinary intelligence, inexhaustible

energy, remarkable political astuteness, and inordinate ambition.

After performing political services of great merit, Manuel, the eldest,

died at an early age. The mother sought to make her sons Isaac and

Alexius men who could show themselves capable of performing every task

imposed upon them in the high station they were destined to acquire; and

the proof of the influence she exerted in the formation of their

characters is seen not only in their high attainments, but also in the

ascendency she retained over Alexius when he had reached the throne.

Owing to her undying hatred of the house of Ducas, Anna attached herself

to the party of the Empress Eudocia and Romanus, and, being then in high

favor at court, she married her daughter Theodora to Romanus's son

Constantine. The revolution made by John Ducas to the advantage of

himself and his ward, Michael VII., upset all the well-laid plans of

Anna Dalassena; and the fall of Romanus marked for a time the end of the

favor of the Comneni. Anna showed her firmness of character by remaining

faithful to the cause of the dethroned emperor. Her correspondence with

him was detected, and she was exiled, with her children, to one of the

Prince's Isles. Her exile did not last long, however, for she was

recalled and restored to favor; and Michael VII. brought about the

marriage of Isaac, the eldest son since the death of Manuel, to Irene,

daughter of an Alanian prince, and cousin-german to the Empress Maria.

Women of Early Christianity · 第 23 / 27 段