He worked hard, and, first of all, he wisely sought to free himself from

all voluntary disabilities; there were enough and to spare of legally

imposed ones to keep him mindful of his Judaism. He felt strong enough

in faith to need no artificial shackles. He would be Jew, and yet

German--patriot, but no pariah. He would eschew vague dreams of

universalism, false ideas of tribalism. If Palestine had not been, he,

its product, could not be; but Palestine and its glories were of the

past and of the future; the present only was his, and he must shape his

life according to its conditions, which placed him, in the eighteenth

century, born of Jewish parents, in a German city. He was German by

birth, Jew by descent and by conviction; he would fulfil all the

obligations which country, race, and religion impose. But a German Jew,

who did not speak the language of his country? That, surely, was an

anomaly and must be set right. So he set himself strenuously to learn

German, and to make it his native language. Such secular study was by no

means an altogether safe proceeding. Ignorance, as we have seen, was

‘protected’ in those days by Jewish ecclesiastical authority. Free trade

in literature was sternly prohibited, and a German grammar, or a Latin

or a Greek one, had, in sober truth, to run a strict blockade. One

Jewish lad, it is recorded on very tolerable authority, was actually in

the year 1746 expelled the city of Berlin for no other offence than that

of being caught in the act of studying--one chronicle, indeed, says,

carrying--some such proscribed volume. Moses, however, was more

fortunate; he saved money enough to buy his books, or made friends

enough to borrow them; and, we may conclude, found nooks in which to

hide them, and hours in which to read them. He set himself, too, to gain

some knowledge of the Classics, and here he found a willing teacher in

one Kish, a medical student from Prague. Later on, another helper was

gained in a certain Israel Moses, a Polish schoolmaster, afterwards

known as Israel Samosc. This man was a fine mathematician, and a

first-rate Hebrew scholar; but as his attainments did not include the

German language, he made Euclid known to Moses through the medium of a

Hebrew translation. Moses, in return, imparted to Samosc his newly

acquired German, and learnt it, of course, more thoroughly through

teaching it. He must have possessed the art of making friends who were

able to take on themselves the office of teachers; for presently we find

him, in odd half-hours, studying French and English under a Dr. Aaron

Emrich.[33] He very early began to make translations of parts of the

Scripture into German, and these attempts indicate that, from the first,

his overpowering desire for self-culture sprang from no selfishness. He

wanted to open up the closed roads to place and honour, but not to tread

them alone, not to leave his burdened brethren on the bye-paths, whilst

he sped on rejoicing. He knew truly enough that ‘the light was sweet,’

and that ‘a pleasant thing it is to behold the sun.’ But he heeded, too,

the other part of the charge: he ‘remembered the days of darkness, which

were many.’ He remembered them always, heedfully, pitifully, patiently;

and to the weary eyes which would not look up or could not, he ever

strove to adjust the beautiful blessed light which he knew, and they,

poor souls, doubted, was good. He never thrust it, unshaded, into their

gloom: he never carried it off to illumine his own path.

Thus, the translations at which Moses Mendelssohn worked were no

transcripts from learned treatises which might have found a ready market

among the scholars of the day; but unpaid and unpaying work from the

liturgy and the Scriptures, done with the object that his people might

by degrees share his knowledge of the vernacular, and become gradually

and unconsciously familiar with the language of their country through

the only medium in which there was any likelihood of their studying it.

With that one set purpose always before him, of drawing his people with

him into the light, he presently formed the idea of issuing a serial in

Hebrew, which, under the title of _The Moral Preacher_, should introduce

short essays and transcripts on other than strictly Judaic or religious

subjects. One Bock was his coadjutor in this project, and two numbers of

the little work were published. The contents do not seem to have been

very alarming. To our modern notions of periodical literature, they

would probably be a trifle dull; but their mild philosophy and yet

milder science proved more than enough to arouse the orthodox fears of

the poor souls, who, ‘bound in affliction and iron,’ distrusted even the

gentle hand which was so eager to loose the fetters. There was a murmur

of doubt, of muttered dislike of ‘strange customs’; perhaps here and

there too, a threat concerning the pains and penalties which attached

to the introduction of such. At any rate, but two numbers of the poor

little reforming periodical appeared; and Moses, not angry at his

failure, not more than momentarily discouraged by it, accepted the

position and wasted no time nor temper in cavilling at it. He had learnt

to labour, he could learn to wait. And thus, in hard yet happy work,

passed away the seven years, from fourteen till twenty-one, which are

the seed-time of a man’s life. In 1750, when Moses was nearly of age, he

came into possession of what really proved an inheritance. A rich silk

manufacturer, named Bernhardt, who was a prominent member of the Berlin

synagogue, made a proposal to the learned young man, whose perseverance

had given reputation to his scholarship, to become resident tutor to his

children. The offer was gladly accepted, and it may be considered

Mendelssohn’s first step on the road to success. The first step to fame

had been taken when the boy had set out on his long tramp to Berlin.

Bernhardt was a kind and cultured man, and in his house Mendelssohn

found both congenial occupation and welcome leisure. He was teacher by

day, student by night, and author at odd half-hours. He turned to his

books with the greatest ardour; and we read of him studying Locke and

Plato in the original, for by this time English and Greek were both

added to his store of languages. His pupils, meanwhile, were never

neglected, nor in the pursuit of great ends were trifles ignored. In

more than one biography special emphasis is laid on his beautifully neat

handwriting, which, we are told, much excited his employer’s admiration.

This humble, but very useful, talent may possibly have been inherited,

with some other small-sounding virtues, from the poor father in Dessau,

to whom many a nice present was now frequently sent. At the end of three

or four years of tutorship, Bernhardt’s appreciation of the young man

took a very practical expression. He offered Moses Mendelssohn the

position of book-keeper in his factory, with some especial

responsibilities and emoluments attached to the office. It was a

splendid opening, although Moses Mendelssohn, the philosopher, eagerly

and gratefully accepting such a post somehow jars on one’s

susceptibilities, and seems almost an instance of the round man pushed

into the square hole. It was, however, an assured position; it gave him

leisure, it gave him independence, and in due time wealth, for as years

went on he grew to be a manager, and finally a partner in the house. His

tastes had already drawn him into the outer literary circle of Berlin,

which at this time had its headquarters in a sort of club, which met to

play chess and to discuss politics and philosophy, and which numbered

Dr. Gompertz, the promising young scholar Abbt, and Nicolai, the

bookseller,[34] among its members. With these and other kindred spirits,

Mendelssohn soon found pleasant welcome; his talents and geniality

quickly overcoming any social prejudices, which, indeed, seldom flourish

in the republic of letters. And, early disadvantages notwithstanding, we

may conclude without much positive evidence on the subject, that

Mendelssohn possessed that valuable, indefinable gift, which culture,

wealth, and birth united occasionally fail to bestow--the gift of good

manners. He was free alike from conceit and dogmatism, the Scylla and

Charybdis to most young men of exceptional talent. He had the loyal

nature and the noble mind, which we are told on high authority is the

necessary root of the rare flower; and he had, too, the sympathetic,

unselfish feeling which we are wont to summarise shortly as a good

heart, and which is the first essential to good manners.

When Lessing came to Berlin, about 1745, his play of _Die Juden_ was

already published, and his reputation sufficiently established to make

him an honoured guest at these little literary gatherings. Something of

affinity in the wide, unconventional, independent natures of the two

men; something, it may be, of likeness in unlikeness in their early

struggles with fate, speedily attracted Lessing and Mendelssohn to each

other. The casual acquaintance soon ripened into an intimate and

lifelong friendship, which gave to Mendelssohn, the Jew, wider knowledge

and illimitable hopes of the outer, inhospitable world--which gave to

Lessing, the Christian, new belief in long-denied virtues; and which,

best of all, gave to humanity those ‘divine lessons of Nathan der

Weise,’ as Goethe calls them--for which character Mendelssohn sat, all

unconsciously, as model, and scarcely idealised model, to his friend. It

was, most certainly, a rarely happy friendship for both, and for the

world. Lessing was the godfather of Mendelssohn’s first book. The

subject was suggested in the course of conversation between them, and a

few days after Mendelssohn brought his manuscript to Lessing. He saw no

more of it till his friend handed him the proofs and a small sum for the

copyright; and it was in this way that the _Philosophische Gespräche_

was anonymously published in 1754. Later, the friends brought out

together a little book, entitled _Pope as a Metaphysician_, and this was

followed up with some philosophical essays (‘Briefe über die

Empfindungen’) which quickly ran through three editions, and Mendelssohn

became known as an author. A year or two later, he gained the prize

which the Royal Academy of Berlin offered for the best essay on the

problem ‘Are metaphysics susceptible of mathematical demonstration?’ for

which prize Kant was one of the competitors.

Lessing’s migration to Leipzig, and his temporary absences from the

capital in the capacity of tutor, made breaks, but no diminution, in the

friendship with Mendelssohn; and the _Literatur-Briefe_, a journal cast

in the form of correspondence on art, science, and literature, to which

Nicolai, Abbt, and other writers were occasional contributors, continued

its successful publication till the year 1765. A review in this journal

of one of the literary efforts of Frederick the Second gave rise to a

characteristic ebullition of what an old writer quaintly calls ‘the

German endemical distemper of Judæophobia.’ In this essay, Mendelssohn

had presumed to question some of the conclusions of the royal author;

and although the contents of the _Literatur-Briefe_ were generally

unsigned, the anonymity was in most cases but a superficial disguise.

The paper drew down upon Mendelssohn the denunciation of a too loyal

subject of Frederick’s, and he was summoned to Sans Souci to answer for

it. Frederick appears to have been more sensible than his thin-skinned

defender, and the interview passed off amicably enough. Indeed, a short

while after, we hear of a petition being prepared to secure to

Mendelssohn certain rights and privileges of dwelling unmolested in

whichever quarter of the city he might choose--a right which at that

time was granted to but few Jews, and at a goodly expenditure of both

capital and interest. Mendelssohn, loyal to his brethren, long and

stoutly refused to have any concession granted on the score of his

talents which he might not claim on the score of his manhood in common

with the meanest and most ignorant of his co-religionists. And there is

some little doubt whether the partial exemptions which Mendelssohn

subsequently obtained, were due to the petition, which suffered many

delays and vicissitudes in the course of presentation, or to the subtle

and silent force of public opinion.

Meanwhile Mendelssohn married, and the story of his wooing, as first

told by Berthold Auerbach, makes a pretty variation on the old theme. It

was, in this case, no short idyll of ‘she was beautiful and he fell in

love.’ To begin with, it was all prosaic enough. A certain Abraham

Gugenheim, a trader at Hamburg, caused it to be hinted to Mendelssohn

that he had a virtuous and blue-eyed but portionless daughter, named

Fromet, who had heard of the philosopher’s fame, and had read portions

of his books; and who, mutual friends considered, would make him a

careful and loving helpmate. So Mendelssohn, who was now thirty-two

years old, and desirous to ‘settle,’ went to the merchant’s house and

saw the prim German maiden, and talked with her; and was pleased enough

with her talk, or perhaps with the silent eloquence of the blue eyes, to

go next day to the father and to say he thought Fromet would suit him

for a wife. But to his surprise Gugenheim hesitated, and stiffness and

embarrassment seemed to have taken the place of the yesterday’s cordial

greeting; still, it was no objection on his part, he managed at last to

stammer out. For a minute Mendelssohn was hopelessly puzzled, but only

for a minute; then it flashed upon him, ‘It is she who objects!’ he

exclaimed; ‘then it must be my hump’; and the poor father of course

could only uncomfortably respond with apologetic platitudes about the

unaccountability of girls’ fancies. The humour as well as the pathos of

the situation touched Mendelssohn, for he had no vanity to be piqued,

and he instantly resolved to do his best to win this Senta-like maiden,

who, less fortunate than the Dutch heroine, had had her pretty dreams of

a hero dispelled, instead of accentuated by actual vision. Might he see

her once again, he asked. ‘To say farewell? Certainly!’ answered the

father, glad that his awkward mission was ending so amicably. So

Mendelssohn went again, and found Fromet with the blue eyes bent

steadily over her work; perhaps to hide a tear as much as to prevent a

glance, for Fromet, as the sequel shows, was a tender-hearted maiden,

and although she did not like to look at her deformed suitor, she did

not want to wound him. Then Mendelssohn began to talk, beautiful glowing

talk, and the spell which his writings had exercised began again to work

on the girl. From philosophy to love, in its impersonal form, is an easy

transition. She grew interested and self-forgetful. ‘And do _you_ think

that marriages are made in heaven?’ she eagerly questioned, as some

early quaint superstition on this most attractive of themes was vividly

touched upon by her visitor. ‘Surely,’ he replied; ‘and some old beliefs

on this head assert that all such contracts are settled in childhood.

Strange to say, a special legend attaches itself to my fortune in this

matter; and as our talk has led to this subject perhaps I may venture

to tell it to you. The twin spirit which fate allotted to me, I am told,

was fair, blue-eyed, and richly endowed with all spiritual charms; but,

alas! ill-luck had added to her physical gifts a hump. A chorus of

lamentation arose from the angels who minister in these matters. The

“pity of it” was so evident. The burden of such a deformity might well

outweigh all the other gifts of her beautiful youth, might render her

morose, self-conscious, unhappy. If the load now had been but laid on a

man! And the angels pondered, wondering, waiting to see if any would

volunteer to take the maiden’s burden from her. And I sprang up, and

prayed that it might be laid upon my shoulders. And it was settled so.’

There was a minute’s pause, and then, so the story goes, the work was

passionately thrown down, and the tender blue eyes were streaming, and

the rest we may imagine. The simple, loving heart was won, and Fromet

became his wife.

They had a modest little house with a pretty garden on the outskirts of

Berlin, where a good deal of hospitality went on in a quiet, friendly

way. The ornaments of their dwelling were, perhaps, a little

disproportionate in size and quantity to the rest of the surroundings;

but this was no matter of choice on the part of the newly married

couple, since one of the minor vexations imposed on Jews at this date

was the obligation laid on every bridegroom to treat himself to a large

quantity of china for the good of the manufactory. The tastes or the

wants of the purchaser were not consulted; and in this especial instance

twenty life-sized china apes were allotted to the bridegroom. We may

imagine poor Mendelssohn and his wife eyeing these apes often, somewhat

as Cinderella looked at her pumpkin when longing for the fairy’s

transforming wand. Possibilities of those big baboons changed into big

books may have tantalised Mendelssohn; whilst Fromet’s more prosaic mind

may have confined itself to china and yet have found an unlimited range

for wishing. However, the unchanged and unchanging apes notwithstanding,

Mendelssohn and his wife enjoyed very many years of quiet and contented

happiness, and by and by came children, four of them, and then those old

ungainly grievances were, it is likely, transformed into playfellows.

Parenthood, perhaps, is never quite easy, but it was a very difficult

duty, and a terribly divided one, for a cultivated man who a century ago

desired to bring up his children as good Jews and good citizens. Many a

time, it stands on record, when this patient, self-respecting,

unoffending scholar took his children for a walk coarse epithets and

insulting cries followed them through the streets. No resentment was

politic, no redress was possible. ‘Father, is it _wicked_ to be a Jew?’

his children would ask, as time after time the crowd hooted at them.

‘Father, is it _good_ to be a Jew?’ they grew to ask later on, when in

more serious walks of life they found all gates but the Jews’ gate

closed against them. Mendelssohn must have found such questions

increasingly difficult to answer or to parry. Their very talents, which

enlarged the boundaries, must have made his clever children rebel

against the limitations which were so cruelly imposed. His eldest son

Joseph early developed a strong scientific bias; how could this be

utilised? The only profession which he, as a Jew, might enter, was that

of medicine, and for that he had a decided distaste: perforce he was

sent to commercial pursuits, and his especial talent had to run to

waste, or, at best, to dilettantism. When this Joseph had sons of his

own, can we wonder very much that he cut the knot and saved his children

from a like experience, by bringing them up as Christians?

Mendelssohn himself, all his life through, was unswervingly loyal to his

faith. He took every disability accruing from it, as he took his own

especial one, as being, so far as he was concerned, inevitable, and thus

to be borne as patiently as might be. To him, most certainly, it would

never have occurred to slip from under a burden which had been laid upon

him to bear. Concerning Fromet’s influence on her children records are

silent, and we are driven to conjecture that the pretty significance of

her name was somewhat meaningless.[35] The story of her wooing suggests

susceptibility, perhaps, rather than strength of heart; and it may be

that as years went on the ‘blue eyes’ got into a habit of weeping only

over sorrows and wrongs which needed a less eloquent and a more helpful

mode of treatment.

If Mendelssohn’s wife had been able to show her children the home side

of Jewish life, its suggestive ceremonialism, its domestic

compensations--possibly her sons, almost certainly her daughters, would

have learnt the brave, sweet patience that was common to Jewish mothers.

But this takes us to the region of ‘might have been.’ Gentle,

tender-hearted Fromet, it is to be feared, failed in true piety, and,

the mother anchor missing, the children drifted from their moorings.

The leisure of the years succeeding his marriage was fully occupied by

Mendelssohn in literary pursuits. The whole of the Pentateuch was, by

degrees, translated into pure German, and simultaneous editions were

published in German and in Hebrew characters. This great gift to his

people was followed by a metrical translation of the Psalms; a work

which took him ten years, during which time he always carried about with

him a Hebrew Psalter, interleaved with blank pages. In 1783 he published

his _Jerusalem_,[36] a sort of Church and State survey of the Jewish

religion. The first and larger part of it dwells on the distinction

between Judaism, as a State religion, and Judaism as the ‘inheritance’

of a dispersed nationality. He essays to prove the essential differences

between civil and religious government, and to demonstrate that penal

enactments, which in the one case were just and defensible, were, in the

changed circumstances of the other, harmful, and, in point of fact,

unjudicial. The work was, in effect, a masterly effort on Mendelssohn’s

part to exorcise the ‘cursing spirit’ which, engendered partly by

long-suffered persecution, and partly by long association with the

strict discipline of the Catholic Church, had taken a firm grip on

Jewish ecclesiastical authority, and was constantly expressing itself in

bitter anathema and morose excommunication. The second part of the book

is mainly concerned with a vindication of the Jewish character and a

plea for toleration. Scholarly and temperate as is the tone of this

work throughout, it yet evoked a good deal of rough criticism from the

so-called orthodox in both religious camps--from those well-meaning,

purblind persons of the sort who, Lessing declares, see only one road,

and strenuously deny the possible existence of any other.

In 1777, Frederic the Second desired to judge for himself whether Jewish

ecclesiastical authority clashed at any point with the State or

municipal law of the land. A digest of the Jewish Code on the general

questions, and more especially on the subject of property and

inheritance, was decreed to be prepared in German, and to Mendelssohn

was intrusted the task. He had the assistance of the Chief Rabbi of

Berlin, and the result of these labours was published in 1778, under the

title of _Ritual Laws of the Jews_. Another Jewish philosophical work

(published in 1785) was _Morning Hours_.[37] This was a volume of essays

on the evidences of the existence of the Deity and of conclusions

concerning His attributes deduced from the contemplation of His works.

Originally these essays had been given in the form of familiar lectures

on natural philosophy by Mendelssohn to his children and to one or two

of their friends (including the two Humboldts) in his own house, every

morning. In the same category of more distinctively Jewish books we may

place a translation of Manasseh Ben Israel’s famous _Vindiciæ Judæorum_,

which he published, with a very eloquent preface, so early as 1781, just

at the time when Dohm’s generous work on the condition of the Jews as

citizens of the State had made its auspicious appearance. Although this

is one of Mendelssohn’s minor efforts, the preface contains many a

beautiful passage. His gratitude to Dohm is so deep and yet so

dignified; his defence of his people is so wide, and his belief in

humanity so sincere; and the whole is withal so short, that it makes

most pleasant reading. One small quotation may perhaps be permitted, as

pertinent to some recent discussions on Jewish subjects. ‘It is,’ says

he, ‘objected by some that the Jews are both too indolent for

agriculture and too proud for mechanical trades; that if the

restrictions were removed they would uniformly select the arts and

sciences, as less laborious and more profitable, and soon engross all

light, genteel, and learned professions. But those who thus argue

conclude from the _present_ state of things how they will be in the

_future_, which is not a fair mode of reasoning. What should induce a

Jew to waste his time in learning to manage the plough, the trowel, the

plane, etc., while he knows he can make no practical use of them? But

put them in his hand and suffer him to follow the bent of his

inclinations as freely as other subjects of the State, and the result

will not long be doubtful. Men of genius and talent will, of course,

embrace the learned professions; those of inferior capacity will turn

their minds to mechanical pursuits; the rustic will cultivate the land;

each will contribute, according to his station in life, his quota to the

aggregate of productive labour.’

Jewish Portraits · 第 6 / 9 段