PHOTOGRAPHIC NOTES AND QUERIES.

_The Collodion Process._--I have been much pleased with the directions

given by DR. DIAMOND in your columns for the production of collodion

positives; but they have been hitherto unaccompanied by any reference to

the causes of those numerous failures that occur in this delicate process,

and which are so disheartening to {186} beginners. I will just enumerate a

few of the appearances with which I have been troubled, and trust that they

may elicit from other operators an account of some of their instructive

failures. I will premise, as an answer to a former Query respecting the

cost and description of lenses, that I obtained mine of Mr. Goddard, now of

Jesse Cottage, Witton, Middlesex. They are combination-lenses, two inches

and a quarter in diameter (achromatic); the front lens can be used singly

for views, producing a picture nearly seven inches square, but when

combined covering four inches. For these, with brass mounting, I paid less

than 3l.: a single lens, the same diameter, would be about 1l. They work to

focus, cover flat, and define well, producing pictures equal to the most

expensive.

I have usually preferred Mr. Archer's collodion, as the most certain and

cleanest. The silver bath is composed of thirty grains nitrate of silver

and two drops of nitric acid to each ounce of distilled water. An even film

may be obtained by the following means:--Represent the plate of glass by

the following figure:

+--------------------+

| 1 3 |

| |

| |

| 2 4 |

+--------------------+

Hold the plate with the left hand at 1, pour a body of collodion in the

centre: tilt towards 1 (being careful not to let it touch the thumb),

incline towards 2, run into 3, and pour off at 4: then hold the plate

vertically (resting the corner 4 on the neck of the collodion bottle) to

drain: incline it first to the right and then to the left, repeating this

several times until the ridges are removed. By these means an even film may

be produced, without a thick ridge, from 2 to 4. The time it may be left

before plunging into the silver bath will depend on the temperature (about

half a minute). Dip evenly into the bath, lifting up and down to allow of

the evaporation of the ether: the film will also saturate more rapidly.

When the greasy appearance is gone, it is ready for the camera. Sometimes

the film is nearly transparent and bluish, not having sufficient iodide of

silver; or it may contain too much iodide, the greater part flaking off in

the bath, leaving the collodion with very little, and that patchy; or from

being placed in the bath too quick, the lower corner still present a

reticulated appearance, which of course renders it useless.

Having exposed the plate the necessary time, the next step is the

development. The solution I usually employ is prepared with protosulphate

of iron. I do not find distilled water absolutely necessary (during the

summer months I fancied the tones were improved by using ordinary water,

perhaps from containing a little lime), and the acetate acid is not

glacial, but a description termed Beaufoy's, much less expensive. The

proportions are--

Water 2 ounces.

Acetic acid 1 drachm.

Protosulphate of iron 8 grains.

Nitric acid 2 drops.

Mix the water and acetic acid first; then dissolve the iron; and, lastly,

add the nitric acid, which, by varying the quantity, produces different

effects. On pouring the solution over the plate, there is sometimes a

difficulty experienced in causing it to flow evenly. Sometimes a little

more acetic acid in the developing solution, or, if the plate has been out

of the bath some time, redipping it, will prevent this; but if this does

not remove it, and the resulting picture is hard and unpleasant in tone, a

new bath is necessary. For positives, the resulting picture is more

pleasing and delicate by using the developing agent rather weak. After it

has remained on sufficiently long to bring out the image, the undecomposed

iodide is to be removed by hyposulphite of soda. I always use the same

solution, pouring it on and off until exhausted. Having sufficiently

washed, the picture may perhaps appear with many black spots, this may in

future be obviated by adding a little alcohol to the collodion:--or it may

be covered with white spots; in that case the collodion requires settling,

or rapidly filtrating through an old piece of loose silk. Sometimes it will

look all black and white (a common fault with collodion positives), without

middle tints: by adding a little more acetic acid, or an extra drop of

nitric acid, to the developing solution, or the addition of a few drops of

ordinary pyrogallic solution, this disagreeable effect may be overcome. In

taking portraits, it is often caused by having the sitter placed with too

much front light. Then, again, the should-be whites of the picture may be

dull and greenish by reflected, and red by transmitted, light. This effect

I generally find remedied by putting less nitric acid in the developing

solution. During the development, by watching the colour (by holding a

piece of white paper underneath), this red tendency may be observed; in

that case the drawing may be preserved by leaving the plate for about a

minute after pouring the developing agent off, and before removing the

iodide. Some change appears to take place by its contact with the air; it

gradually gets more opaque, and when finished, though not so white as many,

yet presenting an extremely rich brownish-yellow tone.

During the late dull weather, many of my plates have shown a tendency to an

uniform leaden-looking deposit, destroying the blacks of the picture. A

little more nitric acid in the bath will sometimes overcome this, but I

have not yet found a sufficient remedy. During the summer months I was in

the habit of using double the quantity of {187} iron I have stated,

diluting the solution more; then was compelled to diminish the quantity to

twelve grains, and now I use eight. I have tried the proportions

recommended by French photographers, but they seem to contain too large a

proportion of iron. I prefer the use of the protosulphate to the

protonitrate of iron from its cheapness, and the ease with which it is made

up. It will also keep for any length of time, rather improving than

otherwise.

I back with liquid jet from Suggitt, opposite the House of Correction,

Mount Pleasant, Clerkenwell. It dries rapidly, and brightens the

appearance.

Notes and Queries, Number 173, February 19, 1853 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 88 / 159 题