Section III. And be it enacted, that nothing contained in the

two preceding sections shall be construed to prevent the

compounding or sale of any such liquors for medicinal purposes

by a pharmacist or druggist, and upon a written bona fide

prescription of a regular practising physician, whose name shall

be signed thereto; and all such prescriptions shall be filled

and kept by such pharmacist or druggist, and no prescription

shall serve for more than one purchaser; but no physician shall

make or sign such prescription unless the person for whom it is

made is actually sick and such liquor is absolutely necessary as

a medicine; any physician who shall be deemed guilty of

violation of such sections, and upon conviction thereof, shall

be fined not less than $50.00 nor more than $200.00 for the

first offence, and not less than $200.00 nor more than $500.00

for each subsequent offence; and if the buyer shall obtain a

prescription by misrepresentation he shall likewise be deemed

guilty of a violation of said sections, and upon conviction

thereof shall be subject to the same fine as the physician who

shall violate the same; the one-half of said fine to be paid to

the informer and the residue to the school fund of Baltimore

City; and said violators shall be committed to the City Jail of

Baltimore City until such fine and costs are paid; but nothing

herein shall be construed to prohibit a sale by a pharmacist or

druggist in a case of extreme illness, where delay may be

dangerous to the patient.

The second line of action determined upon by the committee was to draw

up a petition to the Liquor License Board, which was done by another

sub-committee.

The third line of action was to take definite steps to publish the work

of the League among the best white people of the city.

After the petition had been approved by the Advisory Committee it was

presented to the Board of Liquor License Commissioners, and the comments

by the newspapers were most gratifying. The Baltimore Sun, in commenting

upon the petition, said, among other things:

“The Liquor License Board’s action upon the petition of many good

citizens for a reduction of the number of licenses for saloons at

certain points in northwest Baltimore is awaited with much interest by

that portion of the public which is concerned in the good order of that

section of the city. It is a section which has not in the past had the

best reputation for freedom from acts of violence and disorder on the

part of Negro roughs and bad characters, and this is believed to be

connected with the fact that in a comparatively small area there are as

many as 45 saloons, of which eight are conducted by Negroes. As a

considerable portion of the Negro population of the city has its habitat

there, it is interesting to note that the most urgent advocates of a

reduction of the number of the saloons are the Colored Law and Order

League, with many colored ministers, teachers and lawyers.... The white

element of the northwestern section is also concerned to have eliminated

as far as possible the danger to peace and order created by the

objectionable places in its neighborhood. It is clearly up to the Liquor

License Board to exercise in the public interest the wide discretion it

possesses. When saloons are excessively numerous and a menace to good

people licenses may and should be withdrawn till the quota for each

neighborhood is within reasonable limits.”

A date for the hearing was set and the Executive Committee proceeded

then to interest as many white people outside of the Advisory Committee

as they could reach. They presented their case to the Association of

Presbyterian, Congregational and Reformed Church ministers, to the

Ministerial Union, to the Methodist Ministers’ Association, to the A. M.

E. Ministers’ Association and to the Colored Ministerial Union. The

Association of Presbyterian, Congregational and Reformed Church

Ministers responded with the following resolution and sent their

committee, who appeared at the hearing:

Baltimore, March 2, 1908.

The Presbyterian, Congregational and Reformed Association of

Baltimore has heard with profound interest the graphic

presentation of the fearful conditions now existing in the

neighborhood of the colored schools and churches in congested

populations in our city, and most heartily unites in the effort

to remove these social cancers from our city, and to this end we

authorize our Secretary to sign in our behalf the petition to

the Liquor License Commissioners for the relief proposed.

H. BRANCH,

H. E. KIRK,

DEWITT M. BENHAM,

Committee.

It is interesting to note that the preacher who was most instrumental in

bringing about a conference with the Presbyterian, Congregational and

Reformed Church ministers was an ex-Confederate chaplain, and three or

four others of the white men who took active interest in this movement

were also ex-Confederates. The following letter was written by this

preacher, and showed that not only political lines played no part in

this matter, but that in matters of genuine reform and uplift the best

Southern people stand ready to lend a helping hand:

Ellicott City, Md., March 2, 1908.

My dear Brother: The Committee appointed by our Ministers’

Meeting brought in a report authorizing our Secretary to sign

the petition you suggested, but so profound was the impression

made by your address that the brethren wish to go further and

will do anything to help you in this matter, either by signing

the petition individually or by going before the License Board

in person at the proper time, to help you in this matter.

If you will indicate fully how we may best serve the cause, let

me hear before our next meeting, the 13th inst.

Sincerely yours,

The hearing took place on the 22nd of April, 1908, and the room set

apart by the Board of Liquor License Commissioners for their hearings

was crowded as it had seldom been before. The Colored Law and Order

League was there in force, and represented by their counsel, Mr. John C.

Rose. The Presbyterians were represented by Dr. DeWitt M. Benham, pastor

of one of the leading Presbyterian churches in the South; Rev. Dr. James

E. Cook and Rev. Dr. Kirk. The Methodist Ministers’ Association was

represented by a committee whose chairman was the Rev. Dr. James E.

Watson. The Colored ministers were represented through Rev. John A.

Holmes. Lawyers W. Ashbie Hawkins and C. C. Fitzgerald, representative

of the best types of colored lawyers, were there. The President of the

School Board, Mr. John E. Semmes, was there to voice the indorsement

which the School Board had given to the petition of the Law and Order

League.

The Secretary of the Colored Young Men’s Christian Association was

present to make protest on behalf of that institution. Bishop Paret, who

would have been present but for the fact that his official duties called

him to another part of the State at that time, sent the following

letter, which expressed his views in the matter:

March 28, 1908.

Board of Liquor License Commissioners.

Gentlemen: As living on the very border of the district

described in the petition from the “Baltimore Law and Order

League,” I am well acquainted with the local conditions. I am

deeply interested also for the welfare and good order of the

people living in it, many of whom are under my own pastoral

charge. I have studied the conditions and facts very closely,

and I am fully convinced that your petitioners have not at all

exaggerated the evil. I have had personal proof of the

corruption and corrupting influence of that portion of our city.

And I earnestly ask of you gentlemen to give your assistance to

the efforts which earnest people are making to abate the evil.

The suppression of many of the drinking places, and the

restrictions asked for the others will do much to help.

I have never before offered advice or suggestion in any public

affair, but in this case I feel that I must speak both for

myself and for the many who agree with me.

(Signed) WILLIAM PARET,

Bishop of Maryland.

The Liquor Dealers’ Association was represented by an array of some of

the leading lawyers in the city. Individual saloonkeepers were

represented by their attorneys. Interested white citizens and black

citizens vied with each other for standing room at this hearing.

A most remarkable feature of this fight was an unsolicited petition sent

in by the property holders on McCulloh Street. McCulloh Street

immediately adjoins Druid Hill Avenue on the north and marks the

beginning of the white district. The people in this street bitterly

resented the “invasion” of Druid Hill Avenue by the blacks. Their action

in coming to the support of the Law and Order League was consequently a

great surprise, though none the less welcome. Having noted in the public

press the action of the Law and Order League, they sent the following

strong endorsement, which was also approved by ex-Mayor Latrobe and

United States Attorney General Charles J. Bonaparte:

To the Board of Liquor License Commissioners.

Gentlemen: We have read with peculiar pleasure in the morning

papers of to-day the accounts of the vigorous efforts and the

petitions to your honorable board to withhold licenses for

saloons on Druid Hill and Pennsylvania Avenues and immediate

vicinities; and we wish to supplement such timely action with

all sincerity.

The existence of saloons in proximity to the triangular section

bounded by Eutaw and St. Mary Streets and Druid Hill Avenue

constitutes the prevailing menace to the success of efforts for

fifteen years past to widen and park McCulloh Street from Biddle

Street to Eutaw Street, and the improvements consequent thereon

in accordance with the recommendations of the Hopkins Park

Commission, together with the combined movements of property

holders on McCulloh and Monument Streets, whereby they believe

millions of dollars in real estate values can be reclaimed and

enhanced.

The absence of saloons on Druid Hill Avenue (and contiguously)

will result in making that street vastly more desirable (for

residences and stores), and as it is now principally occupied by

colored persons, the line of such occupation should terminate at

that street; and we applaud the efforts of the colored ministers

and others of their race in the strenuous protests against

saloons in general and in particular in that section in

question.

Very respectfully yours,

ELI M. LAMB, Chairman.

WINFIELD PETERS, Secretary.

THOMAS MacKENZIE, Attorney.

The names of the indorsers of the petition follow:

Thos. J. Morris

Michael Jenkins

John S. Gittings

Arthur Chilton Powell,

Rector of Grace P. E. Church

H. Irvine Keyser

Wm. B. Hurst

James W. Denny

Wm. Whitridge, M. D.

Ira Remsen

B. N. Baker

Eugene Levering

Douglas H. Thomas

Miles White, Jr.

James R. Wheeler

Wm. E. Mosely, M. D.

Saml. Theobald, M. D.

Wilbur P. Morgan, M. D.

Saml. Johnston, M. D.

Richard D. Fisher

Baltimore Monthly Meeting of Friends (Orthodox), Eutaw and

Monument Streets, by

JOHN C. THOMAS,

President Board of Trustees.

The following were also filed:

I approve of all well-considered and judicious attempts to

reduce in number the sources of drunkenness and crime by

removing disreputable or superfluous saloons from all

localities, and also all saloons from those localities where

they depreciate the value of real property and endanger the

health and morals of the people.

(Signed) FERDINAND C. LATROBE,

April 27, 1908. Ex-Mayor Baltimore City.

I fully concur in the above expressions of General Latrobe.

(Signed) HENRY WILLIAMS,

Ex-Tax Collector Baltimore City.

I heartily approve of all well-considered and judicious attempts

to reduce in number the sources of drunkenness and crime by

removing disreputable or superfluous saloons from all localities

and all saloons from those localities where they depreciate real

property and endanger the health and morals of the population.

(Signed) CHARLES J. BONAPARTE,

April 25, 1908. U. S. Attorney General.

At the hearing, upon advice of counsel, the Law and Order League

declined to present any specific charges against any particular saloon

in the neighborhood, but asked the Board to regard the law which

required that every place licensed should in the judgment of the Board

be “necessary for the accommodation of the public.” They urged that the

people of that community did not require forty-three saloons to meet

their needs. The general charge was made that where these saloons were

thickest the neighborhood was most disorderly as well as most unsanitary

and unhealthy. This statement, however, was met by the police, who, with

marked unanimity, swore that all of the saloons were quiet, orderly and

fully complied with every law and regulation under which they operated.

Some of them swore that the churches, and particularly the church on

Orchard Street, gave them far more trouble than the saloons. This charge

by the police was met by a rejoinder from the trustees of the

Metropolitan M. E. Church, the colored church in question, which was as

follows:

METROPOLITAN METHODIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH,

Orchard St., near Druid Hill Ave., Baltimore, Maryland.

April 13, 1908.

_To the Honorable, the Board of Liquor License Commissioners,

Baltimore City._

Gentlemen: On the 6th inst. a protest against saloons in that

neighborhood of the city bounded by Druid Hill Avenue, Eutaw

Street, New Street, Paca Street, Franklin Street, Pennsylvania

Avenue, George Street, Biddle Street, Argyle Avenue, Hoffman

Street, Pennsylvania Avenue and Lafayette Avenue, was made by

the Law and Order League. On the 8th inst. the dealers against

whose saloons the protest was made replied. It was reported in

an article in “The Sun” of the 9th inst. that one of the

witnesses—a policeman—stated that more trouble was caused by

this church than by any of the saloons protested against.

In reply to the same, we respectfully call the attention of your

Honorable Body to the following:

I. This church has repeatedly protested against the large number

of saloons in its immediate neighborhood.

II. At least two saloons (one at the corner of Biddle Street and

Druid Hill Avenue and one at the corner of Druid Hill

Avenue and Biddle Alley) have been licensed over the

protests of this church and citizens.

III. On December 16, 1907, a letter in reference to saloon 823

Druid Hill Avenue, managed by one Oscar E. Goode, being

kept open on Sundays, was sent to His Honor Mayor Mahool.

IV. This church has never had occasion to call upon the police

to quell, or settle, any disturbance.

V. It teaches to its members the doctrine that the laws of the

State and City must be observed.

Because of the foregoing, we deny the statement above referred

to, declare it to be untrue and unworthy of any consideration in

the settlement of the question at issue, and are ready, through

our representative, to submit further evidences which your

Honorable Body may wish to receive.

Respectfully submitted,

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES,

Metropolitan M. E. Church.

One of the points brought out in the discussion was that the presence of

so many saloons in this neighborhood had depreciated the value of

property, in some cases as much as one hundred per cent. The class of

saloon patrons are in the main of such low type that they drive the

decent people out of the neighborhood and make the main streets through

the section objectionable and even dangerous as public highways.

Respectable people in large numbers take the side streets rather than

walk through lower Pennsylvania or Druid Hill Avenue. The disposition

was to charge this depreciation to the presence of colored people, on

the ground that colored people always lowered the value of property.

This was disproved by the fact that in the upper end of Druid Hill

Avenue, into which the better classes of colored people are moving,

property was actually selling at higher prices than it had reached when

it was a white neighborhood. One of the first colored men to buy in the

upper Druid Hill Avenue district bought in a row in which prices have

advanced over sixty per cent. Houses in this neighborhood now rent and

sell at from twenty to fifty per cent. advance on prices prevailing when

the neighborhood was white.

The bad sanitary conditions, the bad moral conditions, the prevalence of

disease, particularly tuberculosis, were all pointed out in the

argument, as well as the fact that, notwithstanding the neighborhood had

fifteen schools and twelve churches, the influence of these institutions

was practically nullified by the forty-two saloons. The bad name of the

neighborhood, the demoralization of the children, the constant menace to

peace and quiet, were also called attention to. One instance of the

effect of these places upon the children which was cited was of a little

boy who used to come to school day after day, and soon after arriving

fall into a deep sleep. Investigation proved the fact that this child

was given liquor at his home every day by his degraded relatives. Many

instances of school girls whose morals have been corrupted were cited.

One case in particular, in which a married man was arrested, indicted

and sent to the penitentiary for taking a fourteen-year-old school girl

into one of the dens of vice in this neighborhood and keeping her there

all night. The Charity Organization Society corroborated the argument as

to the poverty of this neighborhood by the statement that from this

district came relatively the largest number of requests for assistance.

The committees from the various organizations which joined in this

general protest against the relicensing of the saloons presented the bad

features of the neighborhood so strongly, while the liquor interests and

the police painted them in such glowing colors, that the Board was

unable to decide on the testimony, but they determined upon the unique

plan of personally inspecting the neighborhood. The following report of

this inspection is taken from the Baltimore American of the next day:

“The Board of Liquor License Commissioners announced its decision

yesterday in the case of the protest made recently by the Law and Order

League....

“The decision was reached only after the Board had made a personal

inspection of the sections specified in the protest. Owing to the

unusual manner in which the protest was presented and the nature of the

testimony offered at the hearing of each case, the Board found that it

was impossible to arrive at a satisfactory agreement in the matter. By

Wednesday at noon the case had assumed such complicated proportions that

President Howard, of the Board, suggested that the only way out of it

was to go unheralded and see for themselves.

“The result of the trip of inspection was that the decision of the Board

was based more on what it saw than on the testimony. In fact, the Board

decided that licenses should be refused to what it described as the

worst saloons in the specified section. In the big saloon belt, which

Mr. Rose wanted overhauled by the Board, were forty-five saloons, some

of them very near to colored schools and churches. Mr. Rose especially

wanted licenses refused to those particular saloons. The Board rejected

eleven applicants for renewals, none of which were near schools or

churches....”

The American spoke the next morning as follows:

AN UNSANITARY SECTION.

“There is no just reason for Baltimore to have a portion of its

confines labeled the tuberculosis section.... Scarcely less

interesting than the features of its report with regard to the

unwarranted number of saloons in the section against which

protests have been entered are the observations of the Liquor

License Board upon the subject of sanitation.

“The Board made a personal visitation to the locality centering

in Druid Hill and Pennsylvania Avenues and found a deplorable

state of affairs. Not only was it convinced that there was an

excess of saloons, a number of which were in violation of the

law with respect to the placing of their entrances, but it saw

evidences of gambling and other forms of depravity. It is

clearly a case for the exercise by the police of increased

diligence.”

The result of the personal inspection made by the Board of

Liquor License Commissioners was that, notwithstanding the sworn

testimony of the police, they found eleven saloons openly

violating the law, and determined that these eleven should not

be relicensed. This was such a remarkable situation that the

Baltimore News the next day came out with the following

stricture upon the police:

WHY WERE THE POLICE SO BLIND IN THESE CASES?

“The Board of Liquor License Commissioners deserve, and will

receive, public commendation for their refusal yesterday to

grant eleven saloon licenses which the Law and Order League

protested against. The saloons are situated on Druid Hill

Avenue, Pennsylvania Avenue and adjacent streets, and have been

the subject of grave complaint. President Howard and his

associates could not signalize the close of their term of office

better than by setting such an example to the incoming Liquor

License Commissioners.

“There is one development in connection with the hearings in

these cases which calls for more than passing notice, and that

is the testimony of the police as to the character of the

saloons. It is a remarkable thing that with so many respectable

people in a neighborhood complaining about these saloons, the

police—who should be most familiar with conditions—could find

nothing wrong about them. Worse than this, in the case of

saloons so plainly objectionable that the Liquor License

Commissioners, on personal inspection, discover reason enough

for refusing licenses, policemen are found blandly swearing that

they are decent, orderly places.

“The report of the Liquor License Commissioners is a serious

indictment of the credibility of policemen as witnesses in

hearings of this character, and suggests the need of a searching

investigation to ascertain why the police are ignorant of

conditions in the neighborhood in question, which are shown to

be shockingly bad.”

The new Police Board, which went into office on May 1, 1908,

took up the matter of dealing with these policemen, as the

following quotation from the News indicates:

“One of the first actions of the new Police Board, which will be

sworn in on Monday next, may be to bring before it several of

the most prominent officers of the northwestern district to

investigate the charge that they testified falsely before the

Liquor License Board concerning conditions surrounding saloons

in their territory.

“These men—more than a dozen of them—testified that certain

saloons within the district bounded by New Street, Lafayette

Avenue, Argyle Avenue and Druid Hill Avenue, were well kept and

orderly. In fact, they whitewashed these places completely and

comprehensively. The protests, however, were so strong that the

Liquor License Commissioners went to see the places personally.

“As a result they yesterday declined to renew the license of

eleven of the saloons. They found them dirty and unsanitary in

some cases; they found card playing going on in others, and

white and black people of both sexes mingling and in one

instance they found the law violated which prohibits a saloon

from having entrance other than on a public highway....

“Nevertheless, the action of the Board in itself constitutes a

rather serious criticism of the Department. Some of the officers

who testified in favor of the saloons stated that they had been

working in that territory for more than twenty years; and yet,

apparently, in all that time they had not discovered what it

took the Liquor License Commissioners only a few hours to find

out.”

SAYS THE NEW BOARD WILL ACT.

Sherlock Swann is to be President of the new Police Board.

“We are not yet sworn in,” he said this morning, when asked what

the Board would do in the matter, “but you can put it down that

the new Board will take whatever action is proper.”

The rejection of these eleven men was followed almost

immediately by a renewal of their applications, either in their

own names or in the names of pseudo buyers of their saloons,

which made it necessary to fight over again before the new Board

the whole question, with the difference that the Law and Order

League was now required to meet each individual applicant.

The committee, together with the help received from the various

organizations which had come to their assistance, succeeded in

convincing the Board of the justice of refusing a license to any

of the places which had been rejected by the old Board. The new

Board also rejected applications for the transfer of licenses

from places in other parts of the city to two other places in

this neighborhood. These two now made a total of thirteen places

closed within the lower Druid Hill Avenue district.

In this first campaign the best citizens, white and black,

rallied to the support of the Law and Order League. The net

results of the work are most satisfactory. Much, however,

remains to be done, and the Law and Order League promises to

reorganize its forces for the next campaign. White and colored

men in Baltimore now understand each other better. Contemptuous

indifference on the one side and suspicion on the other are

disappearing.

Registering the first victory against the forces of sin and

degradation the Law and Order League intends to continue its

efforts until all colored children are thoroughly protected

against the evil influences of the saloon and the dive.

[Illustration]

------------------------------------------------------------------------

List of Publications of the Committee of Twelve

Anyone may obtain a copy of these publications now in print by

writing to the Secretary of the Committee of Twelve, Hugh M.

Browne, Cheyney, Pa., and enclosing for each publication desired

a two-cent paper wrapper, addressed to himself:

[*]TO THE COLORED MEN OF VOTING AGE IN ALABAMA.

CAN THE SOUTH SOLVE THE NEGRO PROBLEM? _Carl Schurz_

WHY DISFRANCHISEMENT IS BAD _Archibald H. Grimke_

[*]VOTING INSTRUCTIONS TO MARYLAND VOTERS.

[*]WHAT A COLORED MAN SHOULD DO TO VOTE.

GARRISON CENTENARY LEAFLET.

SLAVERY AND THE RACE PROBLEM IN THE SOUTH, _Hon. Wm. H. Fleming_

THE ATLANTA RIOT _Ray Stannard Baker_

THE NEGRO IN AMERICA _Andrew Carnegie_

ADDRESS BEFORE THE NORTH CAROLINA SOCIETY IN NEW YORK, _William

H. Taft_

WORK OF THE COLORED LAW AND ORDER LEAGUE OF BALTIMORE, MD.,

_James H. N. Waring_

STUDY OF THE NEGRO’S PROGRESS IN JACKSON, MISS., _D. W. Woodard_

NEGRO SELF-HELP IN EDUCATION _R. R. Wright, Jr._

NEGRO SELF-HELP IN HOME GETTING _Kelly Miller_

THE CONVICT LEASE SYSTEM (In Preparation) _George W. Forbes_

NEGRO SELF-HELP IN HOSPITAL WORK _George C. Hall, M. D._

Paragraphs

SOME SUCCESSFUL NEGRO BUSINESS MEN

BUSINESS CO-OPERATION BETWEEN WHITE AND NEGRO MEN IN HELENA,

ARK.

EAST BESSEMER, ALA.

NEGRO BANKS IN MISSISSIPPI.

In round numbers the circulation of the above articles has

reached 200,000.

* Out of Print.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Much has been said of the estrangement between the races that

has arisen since the war. But it is often overlooked that in

recent years there has been growing quietly a closer and more

cordial relationship between the better classes of both races.

Men like ex-Governor Northen, of Atlanta; Belton Gilreath, of

Birmingham; W. A. Blair, of Winston-Salem, and many others

throughout the South are doing a great service to the country in

bringing about co-operation between the races, and emphasizing

the fact that the success of the white race is intimately bound

up with the moral and material welfare of the black.

ANDREW CARNEGIE.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

● Transcriber’s Notes:

○ Missing or obscured punctuation was silently corrected.

○ Typographical errors were silently corrected.

○ Inconsistent spelling and hyphenation were made consistent

only when a predominant form was found in this book.

○ Text that was in italics is enclosed by underscores

(_italics_).

Work of the Colored Law and Order League, Baltimore, Md. · 第 3 / 3 章