Three circumstances have generally been supposed necessary t

A

PRELIMINARY DISSERTATION

ON THE

MECHANISM OF THE HEAVENS.

BY

MRS. SOMMERVILLE

PHILADELPHIA:

CAREY & LEA

1832

In order to convey some idea of the object of this work, it may be

useful to offer a few preliminary observations on the nature of the

subject which it is intended to investigate, and of the means that have

already been adopted with so much success to bring within the reach of

our faculties, those truths which might seem to be placed so far beyond

them.

All the knowledge we possess of external objects is founded upon

experience, which furnishes a knowledge of facts, and the comparison of

these facts establishes relations, from which, induction, the intuitive

belief that like causes will produce like effects, leads us to general

laws. Thus, experience teaches that bodies fall at the surface of the

earth with an accelerated velocity, and proportional to their masses.

Newton proved, by comparison, that the force which occasions the fall of

bodies at the earth's surface, is identical with that which retains the

moon in her orbit; and induction led him to conclude that as the moon is

kept in her orbit by the attraction of the earth, so the planets might

be retained in their orbits by the attraction of the sun. By such steps

he was led to the discovery of one of those powers with which the

Creator has ordained that matter should reciprocally act upon matter.

Physical astronomy is the science which compares and identifies the laws

of motion observed on earth with the motions that take place in the

heavens, and which traces, by an uninterrupted chain of deduction from

the great principle that governs the universe, the revolutions and

rotations of the planets, and the oscillations of the fluids at their

surfaces, and which estimates the changes the system has hitherto

undergone or may hereafter experience, changes which require millions of

years for their accomplishment.

The combined efforts of astronomers, from the earliest dawn of

civilization, have been requisite to establish the mechanical theory of

astronomy: the courses of the planets have been observed for ages with a

degree of perseverance that is astonishing, if we consider the

imperfection, and even the want of instruments. The real motions of the

earth have been separated from the apparent motions of the planets; the

laws of the planetary revolutions have been discovered; and the

discovery of these laws has led to the knowledge of the gravitation of

matter. On the other hand, descending from the principle of gravitation,

every motion in the system of the world has been so completely

explained, that no astronomical phenomenon can now be transmitted to

posterity of which the laws have not been determined.

Science, regarded as the pursuit of truth, which can only be attained by

patient and unprejudiced investigation, wherein nothing is too great to

be attempted, nothing so minute as to be justly disregarded, must ever

afford occupation of consummate interest and of elevated meditation. The

contemplation of the works of creation elevates the mind to the

admiration of whatever is great and noble, accomplishing the object of

all study, which in the elegant language of Sir James Mackintosh is to

inspire the love of truth, of wisdom, of beauty, especially of goodness,

the highest beauty, and of that supreme and eternal mind, which contains

all truth and wisdom, all beauty and goodness. By the love or delightful

contemplation and pursuit of these transcendent aims for their own sake

only, the mind of man is raised from low and perishable objects, and

prepared for those high destinies which are appointed for all those who

are capable of them.

The heavens afford the most sublime subject of study which can be

derived from science: the magnitude and splendour of the objects, the

inconceivable rapidity with which they move, and the enormous distances

between them, impress the mind with some notion of the energy that

maintains them in their motions with a durability to which we can see no

limits. Equally conspicuous is the goodness of the great First Cause in

having endowed man with faculties by which he can not only appreciate

the magnificence of his works, but trace, with precision, the operation

of his laws, use the globe he inhabits us a base wherewith to measure

the magnitude and distance of the sun and planets, and make the diameter

of the earth's orbit the first step of a scale by which he may ascend to

the starry firmament. Such pursuits, while they ennoble the mind, at the

same time inculcate humility, by showing that there is a barrier, which

no energy, mental or physical, can ever enable us to pass: that however

profoundly we may penetrate the depths of space, there still remain

innumerable systems compared with which those which seem so mighty to us

must dwindle into insignificance, or even become invisible; and that not

only man, but the globe he inhabits, nay the whole system of which it

forms so small a part, might be annihilated, and its extinction be

unperceived in the immensity or creation.

A complete acquaintance with Physical Astronomy can only be attained by

those who are well versed in the higher branches of mathematical and

mechanical science: such alone can appreciate the extreme beauty of

the results, and of the means by which these results are obtained.

Nevertheless a sufficient skill in analysis to follow the general

outline, to see the mutual dependence of the different parts of the

system, and to comprehend by what means some of the most extraordinary

conclusions have been arrived at, is within the reach of many who shrink

from the task, appalled by difficulties, which perhaps are not more

formidable than those incident to the study of the elements of every

branch of knowledge, and possibly overrating them by not making a

sufficient distinction between the degree of mathematical acquirement

necessary for making discoveries, and that which is requisite for

understanding what others have done. That the study of mathematics and

their application to astronomy are full of interest will be allowed by

all who have devoted their time and attention to these pursuits, and

they only can estimate the delight of arriving at truth, whether it be

in the discovery of a world, or of a new property of numbers.

It has been proved by Newton that a particle of matter placed without

the surface of a hollow sphere is attracted by it in the name manner as

if its mass, or the whole matter it contains, were collected in its

centre. The same is therefore true of a solid sphere which may be

supposed to consist of an infinite number of concentric hollow spheres.

This however is not the case with a spheroid, but the celestial bodies

are so nearly spherical, and at such remote distances from each other,

that they attract and are attracted as if each were a dense point

situate in its centre of gravity, a circumstance which greatly

facilitates the investigation of their motions.

The attraction of the earth on bodies at its surface in that latitude,

the square of whose sine is ⅓, is the same as if it were a sphere; and

experience shows that bodies there fall through 16.0697 feet in a

second. The mean distance of the moon from the earth is about sixty

times the mean radius of the earth. When the number 16.0697 is

diminished in the ratio of 1 to 3600, which is the square of the moon's

distance from the earth, it is found to be exactly the space the moon

would fall through in the first second of her descent to the earth, were

she not prevented by her centrifugal force, arising from the velocity

with which she moves in her orbit. So that the moon is retained in her

orbit by a force having the same origin and regulated by the same law

with that which causes a stone to fall at the earth's surface. The earth

may therefore be regarded as the centre of a force which extends to the

moon; but as experience shows that the action and reaction of matter are

equal and contrary, the moon must attract the earth with an equal and

contrary force.

Newton proved that a body projected in space will move in a conic

section, if it be attracted by a force directed towards a fixed point,

and having an intensity inversely as the square of the distance; but

that any deviation from that law will cause it to move in a curve of a

different nature. Kepler ascertained by direct observation that the

planets describe ellipses round the sun, and later observations show

that comets also move in conic sections: it consequently follows that

the sun attracts all the planets and comets inversely as the square of

their distances from his centre; the sun therefore is the centre of a

force extending indefinitely in space, and including all the bodies of

the system in its action.

Kepler also deduced from observation, that the squares of the periodic

times of the planets, or the times of their revolutions round the sun,

are proportional to the cubes of their mean distances from his centre:

whence it follows, that the intensity of gravitation of all the bodies

towards the sun is the same at equal distances; consequently gravitation

is proportional to the masses, for if the planets and comets be supposed

to be at equal distances from the sun and left to the effects of

gravity, they would arrive at his surface at the same time. The

satellites also gravitate to their primaries according to the same law

that their primaries do to the sun. Hence, by the law of action and

reaction, each body is itself the centre of an attractive force

extending indefinitely in space, whence proceed all the mutual

disturbances that render the celestial motions so complicated, and their

investigation so difficult.

The gravitation of matter directed to a centre, and attracting directly

as the mass, and inversely as the square of the distance, does not

belong to it when taken in mass; particle acts on particle according to

the same law when at sensible distances from each other. If the sun

acted on the centre of the earth without attracting each of its

particles, the tides would be very much greater than they now are, and

in other respects they also would be very different. The gravitation of

the earth to the sun results from the gravitation of all its particles,

which in their turn attract the sun in the ratio of their respective

masses. There is a reciprocal action likewise between the earth and

every particle at its surface; were this not the case, and were any

portion of the earth, however small, to attract another portion and not

be itself attracted, the centre of gravity of the earth would be moved

in space, which is impossible.

The form of the planets results from the reciprocal attraction of their

component particles. A detached fluid mass, if at rest, would assume the

form of a sphere, from the reciprocal attraction of its particles; but

if the mass revolves about an axis, it becomes flattened at the poles,

and bulges at the equator, in consequence of the centrifugal force

arising from the velocity of rotation. For, the centrifugal force

diminishes the gravity of the particles at the equator, and equilibrium

can only exist when these two forces are balanced by an increase of

gravity; therefore, as the attractive force is the same on all particles

at equal distances from the centre of a sphere, the equatorial particles

would recede from the centre till their increase in number balanced the

centrifugal force by their attraction, consequently the sphere would

become an oblate spheroid; and a fluid partially or entirely covering a

solid, as the ocean and atmosphere cover the earth, must assume that

form in order to remain in equilibrio. The surface of the sea is

therefore spheroidal, and the surface of the earth only deviates from

that figure where it rises above or sinks below the level of the sea;

but the deviation is so small that it is unimportant when compared with

the magnitude of the earth. Such is the form of the earth and planets,

but the compression or flattening at their poles is so small, that even

Jupiter, whose rotation is the most rapid, differs but little from a

sphere. Although the planets attract each other as if they were spheres

on account of their immense distances, yet the satellites are near

enough to be sensibly affected in their motions by the forms of their

primaries. The moon for example is so near the earth, that the

reciprocal attraction between each of her particles and each of the

particles in the prominent mass at the terrestrial equator, occasions

considerable disturbances in the motions of both bodies. For, the action

of the moon on the matter at the earth's equator produces a nutation in

the axis of rotation, and the reaction of that matter on the moon is the

cause of a corresponding nutation in the lunar orbit.

If a sphere at rest in space receives an impulse passing through its

centre of gravity, all its parts will move with an equal velocity in a

straight line; but if the impulse does not pass through the centre of

gravity, its particles having unequal velocities, will give it a

rotatory motion at the same time that it is translated in space. These

motions are independent of one another, so that a contrary impulse

passing through its centre of gravity will impede its progression,

without interfering with its rotation. As the sun rotates about an axis,

it seems probable if an impulse in a contrary direction has not been

given to his centre of gravity, that he moves in space accompanied by

all those bodies which compose the solar system, a circumstance that

would in no way interfere with their relative motions; for, in

consequence of our experience that force is proportional to velocity,

the reciprocal attractions of a system remain the same, whether its

centre of gravity be at rest, or moving uniformly in space. It is

computed that had the earth received its motion from a single impulse,

such impulse must have passed through a point about twenty-five miles

from its centre.

Since the motions of the rotation and translation of the planets are

independent of each other, though probably communicated by the same

impulse, they form separate subjects of investigation.

A planet moves in its elliptical orbit with a velocity varying every

instant, in consequence of two forces, one tending to the centre of the

sun, and the other in the direction of a tangent to its orbit, arising

from the primitive impulse given at the time when it was launched into

space: should the force in the tangent cease, the planet would fall to

the sun by its gravity; were the sun not to attract it, the planet would

fly off in the tangent. Thus, when a planet is in its aphelion or at the

point where the orbit is farthest from the sun, his action overcomes its

velocity, and brings it towards him with such an accelerated motion,

that it at last overcomes the sun's attraction, and shoots past him;

then, gradually decreasing in velocity, it arrives at the aphelion where

the sun's attraction again prevails. In this motion the radii vectores,

or imaginary lines joining the centres of the sun and planets, pass over

equal areas in equal times.

If the planets were attracted by the sun only, this would ever be their

course; and because his action is proportional to his mass, which is

immensely larger than that of all the planets put together, the

elliptical is the nearest approximation to their true motions, which are

extremely complicated, in consequence of their mutual attraction, so

that they do not move in any known or symmetrical curve, but in paths

now approaching to, and now receding from the elliptical form, and their

radii vectores do not describe areas exactly proportional to the time.

Thus the areas become a test of the existence of disturbing forces.

To determine the motion of each body when disturbed by all the rest is

beyond the power of analysis; it is therefore necessary to estimate the

disturbing action of one planet at a time, whence arises the celebrated

problem of the three bodies, which originally was that of the moon, the

earth, and the sun, namely,--the masses being given of three bodies

projected from three given points, with velocities given both in

quantity and direction; and supposing the bodies to gravitate to one

another with forces that are directly as their masses, and inversely as

the squares of the distances, to find the lines described by these

bodies, and their position at any given instant.

By this problem the motions of translation of all the celestial bodies

are determined. It is one of extreme difficulty, and would be of

infinitely greater difficulty, if the disturbing action were not very

small, when compared with the central force. As the disturbing influence

of each body may be found separately, it is assumed that the action of

the whole system in disturbing any one planet is equal to the sum of all

the particular disturbances it experiences, on the general mechanical

principle, that the sum of any number of small oscillations is nearly

equal to their simultaneous and joint effect.

On account of the reciprocal action of matter, the stability of the

system depends on the intensity of the primitive momentum of the

planets, and the ratio of their masses to that of the sun: for the

nature of the conic sections in which the celestial bodies move, depends

on the velocity with which they were first propelled in space; had that

velocity been such as to make the planets move in orbits of unstable

equilibrium, their mutual attractions might have changed them into

parabolas or even hyperbolas; so that the earth and planets might ages

ago have been sweeping through the abyss of space: but as the orbits

differ very little from circles, the momentum of the planets when

projected, must have been exactly sufficient to ensure the permanency

and stability of the system. Besides the mass of the sun is immensely

greater than those of the planets; and as their inequalities bear the

same ratio to their elliptical motions as their masses do to that of the

sun, their mutual disturbances only increase or diminish the

eccentricities of their orbits by very minute quantities; consequently

the magnitude of the sun's mass is the principal cause of the stability

of the system. There is not in the physical world a more splendid

example of the adaptation of means to the accomplishment of the end,

than is exhibited in the nice adjustment of these forces.

The orbits of the planets have a very small inclination to the plane of

the ecliptic in which the earth moves; and on that account, astronomers

refer their motions to it at a given epoch as a known and fixed

position. The paths of the planets, when their mutual disturbances are

omitted, are ellipses nearly approaching to circles, whose planes,

slightly inclined to the ecliptic: cut it in straight lines passing

through the centre of the sun; the points where the orbit intersects the

plane of the ecliptic are its nodes.

The orbits of the recently discovered planets deviate more from the

ecliptic: that of Pallas has an inclination of 35° to it: on that

account it will be more difficult to determine their motions. These

little planets have no sensible effect in disturbing the rest, though

their own motions are rendered very irregular by the proximity of

Jupiter and Saturn.

The planets are subject to disturbances of two distinct kinds, both

resulting from the constant operation of their reciprocal attraction,

one kind depending upon their positions with regard to each other,

begins from zero, increases to a maximum, decreases and becomes zero

again, when the planets return to the same relative positions. In

consequence of these, the troubled planet is sometimes drawn away from

the sun, sometimes brought nearer to him; at one time it is drawn above

the plane of its orbit, at another time below it, according to the

position of the disturbing body. All such changes, being accomplished in

short periods, some in a few months, others in years, or in hundreds of

years, are denominated Periodic Inequalities.

The inequalities of the other kind, though occasioned likewise by the

disturbing energy of the planets, are entirely independent of their

relative positions; they depend on the relative positions of the orbits

alone, whose forms and places in space are altered by very minute

quantities in immense periods of time, and are therefore called Secular

Inequalities.

In consequence of disturbances of this kind, the apsides, or extremities

of the major axes of all the orbits, have a direct, but variable motion

in space, excepting those of Venus, which are retrograde; and the lines

of the nodes move with a variable velocity in the contrary direction.

The motions of both are extremely slow; it requires more than 109770

years for the major axis of the earth's orbit to accomplish a sidereal

revolution, and 20935 years to complete its tropical motion. The major

axis of Jupiter's orbit requires no less than 197561 years to perform

its revolution from the disturbing action of Saturn alone. The periods

in which the nodes revolve are also very great. Beside these, the

inclination and eccentricity of every orbit are in a state of perpetual,

but slow change. At the present time, the inclinations of all the orbits

are decreasing; but so slowly, that the inclination of Jupiter's orbit

is only six minutes less now than it was in the age of Ptolemy. The

terrestrial eccentricity is decreasing at the rate of 3914 miles in a

century; and if it were to decrease equably, it would be 36300 years

before the earth's orbit became a circle. But in the midst of all these

vicissitudes, the major axes and mean motions of the planets remain

permanently independent of secular changes; they are so connected by

Kepler's law of the squares of the periodic times being proportional to

the cubes of the mean distances of the planets from the sun, that one

cannot vary without affecting the other.

With the exception of these two elements, it appears, that all the

bodies are in motion, and every orbit is in a state of perpetual change.

Minute as these changes are, they might be supposed liable to accumulate

in the course of ages sufficiently to derange the whole order of nature,

to alter the relative positions of the planets, to put an end to the

vicissitudes of the seasons, and to bring about collisions, which would

involve our whole system, now so harmonious, in chaotic confusion. The

consequences being so dreadful, it is natural to inquire, what proof

exists that creation will be preserved from such a catastrophe? For

nothing can be known from observation, since the existence of the human

race has occupied but a point in duration, while these vicissitudes

embrace myriads of ages. The proof is simple and convincing. All the

variations of the solar system, as well secular as periodic, are

expressed analytically by the sines and cosines of circular arcs, which

increase with the time; and as a sine or cosine never can exceed the

radius, but must oscillate between zero and unity, however much the time

may increase, it follows, that when the variations have by slow changes

accumulated in however long a time to a maximum, they decrease by the

same slow degrees, till they arrive at their smallest value, and then

begin a new course, thus for ever oscillating about a mean value. This,

however, would not be the case if the planets moved in a resisting

medium, for then both the eccentricity and the major axes of the orbits

would vary with the time, so that the stability of the system would be

ultimately destroyed. But if the planets do move in an ethereal medium,

it must be of extreme rarity, since its resistance has hitherto been

quite insensible.

Three circumstances have generally been supposed necessary to prove the

stability of the system: the small eccentricities of the planetary

orbits, their small inclinations, and the revolution of all the bodies,

as well planets as satellites, in the same direction. These, however,

are not necessary conditions: the periodicity of the terms in which the

inequalities are expressed is sufficient to assure us, that though we do

not know the extent of the limits, nor the period of that grand cycle

which probably embraces millions of years, yet they never will exceed

what is requisite for the stability and harmony of the whole, for the

preservation of which every circumstance is so beautifully and

wonderfully adapted.

The plane of the ecliptic itself, though assumed to be fixed at a given

epoch for the convenience of astronomical computation, is subject to a

minute secular variation of 52"·109, occasioned by the reciprocal action

of the planets; but as this is also periodical, the terrestrial equator,

which is inclined to it at an angle of about 23° 28', will never

coincide with the plane of the ecliptic; so there never can be perpetual

spring.

The rotation of the earth is uniform; therefore day and night, summer

and winter, will continue their vicissitudes while the system endures,

or is untroubled by foreign causes.

Yonder starry sphere

Of planets, and of fix'd, in all her wheels

Resembles nearest, mazes intricate,

Eccentric, intervolv'd, yet regular

Then most, when most irregular they seem.

The stability of our system was established by La Grange, 'a discovery,'

says Professor Playfair, 'that must render the name for ever memorable

in science, and revered by those who delight in the contemplation of

whatever is excellent and sublime. After Newton's discovery of the

elliptical orbits of the planets, La Grange's discovery of their

periodical inequalities is without doubt the noblest truth in physical

astronomy; and, in respect of the doctrine of final causes, it may be

regarded as the greatest of all.'

Notwithstanding the permanency of our system, the secular variations in

the planetary orbits would have been extremely embarrassing to

astronomers, when it became necessary to compare observations separated

by long periods. This difficulty is obviated by La Place, who has shown

that whatever changes time may induce either in the orbits themselves,

or in the plane of the ecliptic, there exists an invariable plane

passing through the centre of gravity of the sun, about which the whole

system oscillates within narrow limits, and which is determined by this

property; that if every body in the system be projected on it, and if

the mass of each be multiplied by the area described in a given time by

its projection on this plane, the sum of all these products will be a

maximum. This plane of greatest inertia, by no means peculiar to the

solar system, but existing in every system of bodies submitted to their

mutual attractions only, always remains parallel to itself, and

maintains a fixed position, whence the oscillations of the system may be

estimated through unlimited time. It is situate nearly half way between

the orbits of Jupiter and Saturn, and is inclined to the ecliptic at an

angle of about 1° 35' 31".

All the periodic and secular inequalities deduced from the law of

gravitation are so perfectly confirmed by observations, that analysis

has become one of the most certain means of discovering the planetary

irregularities, either when they are too small, or too long in their

periods, to be detected by other methods. Jupiter and Saturn, however,

exhibit inequalities which for a long time seemed discordant with that

law. All observations, from those of the Chinese and Arabs down to the

present day, prove that for ages the mean motions of Jupiter and Saturn

have been affected by great inequalities of very long periods, forming

what appeared an anomaly in the theory of the planets. It was long known

by observation, that five times the mean motion of Saturn is nearly

equal to twice that of Jupiter; a relation which the sagacity of La

Place perceived to be the cause of a periodic inequality in the mean

motion of each of these planets, which completes its period in nearly

929 Julian years, the one being retarded, while the other is

accelerated. These inequalities are strictly periodical, since they

depend on the configuration of the two planets; and the theory is

perfectly confirmed by observation, which shows that in the course of

twenty centuries, Jupiter's mean motion has been accelerated by 3° 23',

and Saturn's retarded by 5° 13'.

It might be imagined that the reciprocal action of such planets as have

satellites would be different from the influence of those that have

none; but the distances of the satellites from their primaries are

incomparably less than the distances of the planets from the sun, and

from one another, so that the system of a planet and its satellites

moves nearly as if all those bodies were united in their common centre

of gravity; the action of the sun however disturbs in some degree the

motion of the satellites about their primary.

The changes that take place in the planetary system are exhibited on a

small scale by Jupiter and his satellites; and as the period requisite

for the development of the inequalities of these little moons only

extends to a few centuries, it may be regarded as an epitome of that

grand cycle which will not be accomplished by the planets in myriads of

centuries. The revolutions of the satellites about Jupiter are precisely

similar to those of the planets about the sun; it is true they are

disturbed by the sun, but his distance is so great, that their motions

are nearly the same as if they were not under his influence. The

satellites like the planets, were probably projected in elliptical

orbits, but the compression of Jupiter's spheroid is very great in

consequence of his rapid rotation; and as the masses of the satellites

are nearly 100000 times less than that of Jupiter, the immense quantity

of prominent matter at his equator must soon have given the circular

form observed in the orbits of the first and second satellites, which

its superior attraction will always maintain. The third and fourth

satellites being further removed from its influence, move in orbits with

a very small eccentricity. The same cause occasions the orbits of the

satellites to remain nearly in the plane of Jupiter's equator, on

account of which they are always seen nearly in the same line; and the

powerful action of that quantity of prominent matter is the reason why

the motion of the nodes of these little bodies is so much more rapid

than those of the planet. The nodes of the fourth satellite accomplish a

revolution in 520 years, while those of Jupiter's orbit require no less

than 50673 years, a proof of the reciprocal attraction between each

particle of Jupiter's equator and of the satellites. Although the two

first satellites sensibly move in circles, they acquire a small

ellipticity from the disturbances they experience.

The orbits of the satellites do not retain a permanent inclination,

either to the plane of Jupiter's equator, or to that of his orbit, but

to certain planes passing between the two, and through their

intersection; these have a greater inclination to his equator the

further the satellite is removed, a circumstance entirely owing to the

influence of Jupiter's compression.

A singular law obtains among the mean motions and mean longitudes of the

three first satellites. It appears from observation, that the mean

motion of the first satellite, plus twice that of the third, is equal to

three times that of the second, and that the mean longitude of the first

satellite, minus three times that of the second, plus twice that of the

third, is always equal to two right angles. It is proved by theory, that

if these relations had only been approximate when the satellites were

first launched into space, their mutual attractions would have

established and maintained them. They extend to the synodic motions of

the satellites, consequently they affect their eclipses, and have a very

great influence on their whole theory. The satellites move so nearly in

the plane of Jupiter's equator, which has a very small inclination to

his orbit, that they are frequently eclipsed by the planet. The instant

of the beginning or end of an eclipse of a satellite marks the same

instant of absolute time to all the inhabitants of the earth; therefore

the time of these eclipses observed by a traveller, when compared with

the time of the eclipse computed for Greenwich or any other fixed

meridian, gives the difference of the meridians in time, and

consequently the longitude of the place of observation. It has required

all the refinements of modern instruments to render the eclipses of

these remote moons available to the mariner; now however, that system of

bodies invisible to the naked eye, known to man by the aid of science

alone, enables him to traverse the ocean, spreading the light of

knowledge and the blessings of civilization over the most remote

regions, and to return loaded with the productions of another

hemisphere. Nor is this all: the eclipses of Jupiter's satellites have

been the means or a discovery, which, though not so immediately

applicable to the wants of man, unfolds a property of light, that

medium, without whose cheering influence all the beauties of the

creation would have been to us a blank. It is observed, that those

eclipses of the first satellite which happen when Jupiter is near

conjunction, are later by 16' 26" than those which take place when the

planet is in opposition. But as Jupiter is nearer to us when in

opposition by the whole breadth of the earth's orbit than when in

conjunction, this circumstance was attributed to the time employed by

the rays of light in crossing the earth's orbit, a distance of 192

millions of miles; whence it is estimated, that light travels at the

rate of 192000 miles in one second. Such is its velocity, that the

earth, moving at the rate of nineteen miles in a second, would take two

months to pass through a distance which a ray of light would dart over

in eight minutes. The subsequent discovery of the aberration of light

confirmed this astonishing result.

Objects appear to be situate in the direction of the rays that proceed

from them. Were light propagated instantaneously, every object, whether

at rest or in motion, would appear in the direction of these rays; but

as light takes some time to travel, when Jupiter is in conjunction, we

see him by means of rays that left him 16' 26" before; but during that

time we have changed our position, in consequence of the motion of the

earth in its orbit; we therefore refer Jupiter to a place in which he is

not. His true position is in the diagonal of the parallelogram, whose

sides are in the ratio of the velocity of light to the velocity of the

earth in its orbit, which is as 192000 to 19. In consequence of

aberration, none of the heavenly bodies are in the place in which they

seem to be. In fact, if the earth were at rest, rays from a star would

pass along the axis of a telescope directed to it; but if the earth were

to begin to move in its orbit with its usual velocity, these rays would

strike against the side of the tube; it would therefore be necessary to

incline the telescope a little, in order to see the star. The angle

contained between the axis of the telescope and a line drawn to the true

place of the star, is its aberration, which varies in quantity and

direction in different parts of the earth's orbit; but as it never

exceeds twenty seconds, in ordinary cases.

The velocity of light deduced from the observed aberration of the fixed

stars, perfectly corresponds with that given by the eclipses of the

first satellite. The same result obtained from sources so different,

leaves not a doubt of its truth. Many such beautiful coincidences,

derived from apparently the most unpromising and dissimilar

circumstances, occur in physical astronomy, and prove dependences which

we might otherwise be unable to trace. The identity of the velocity of

light at the distance of Jupiter and on the earth's surface shows that

its velocity is uniform; and if light consists in the vibrations of an

elastic fluid or ether filling space, which hypothesis accords best with

observed phenomena, the uniformity of its velocity shows that the

density of the fluid throughout the whole extent of the solar system,

must be proportional to its elasticity. Among the fortunate conjectures

which have been confirmed by subsequent experience, that of Bacon is not

the least remarkable. "It produces in me," says the restorer of true

philosophy, "a doubt, whether the face of the serene and starry heavens

be seen at the instant it really exists, or not till some time later;

and whether there be not, with respect to the heavenly bodies, a true

time and an apparent time, no less than a true place and an apparent

place, as astronomers say, on account of parallax. For it seems

incredible that the species or rays of the celestial bodies can pass

through the immense interval between them and us in an instant; or that

they do not even require some considerable portion of time."

As great discoveries generally lead to a variety of conclusions, the

aberration of light affords a direct proof of the motion of the earth in

its orbit; and its rotation is proved by the theory of falling bodies,

since the centrifugal force it induces retards the oscillations of the

pendulum in going from the pole to the equator. Thus a high degree of

scientific knowledge has been requisite to dispel the errors of the

senses.

The little that is known of the theories of the satellites of Saturn and

Uranus is in all respects similar to that of Jupiter. The great

compression of Saturn occasions its satellites to move nearly in the

plane of its equator. Of the situation of the equator of Uranus we know

nothing, nor of its compression. The orbits of its satellites are nearly

perpendicular to the plane of the ecliptic.

Our constant companion the moon next claims attention. Several

circumstances concur to render her motions the most interesting, and at

the same time the most difficult to investigate of all the bodies of our

system. In the solar system planet troubles planet, but in the lunar

theory the sun is the great disturbing cause; his vast distance being

compensated by his enormous magnitude, so that the motions of the moon

are more irregular than those of the planets; and on account of the

great ellipticity of her orbit and the size of the sun, the

approximations to her motions are tedious and difficult, beyond what

those unaccustomed to such investigations could imagine. Neither the

eccentricity of the lunar orbit, nor its inclination to the plane of the

ecliptic, have experienced any changes from secular inequalities; but

the mean motion, the nodes, and the perigee, are subject to very

remarkable variations.

From an eclipse observed at Babylon by the Chaldeans, on the 19th of

March, seven hundred and twenty-one years before the Christian era, the

place of the moon is known from that of the sun at the instant of

opposition; whence her mean longitude may be found; but the comparison

of this mean longitude with another mean longitude, computed back for

the instant of the eclipse from modern observations, shows that the moon

performs her revolution round the earth more rapidly and in a shorter

time now, than she did formerly; and that the acceleration in her mean

motion has been increasing from age to age as the square of the time;

all the ancient and intermediate eclipses confirm this result. As the

mean motions of the planets have no secular inequalities, this seemed to

be an unaccountable anomaly, and it was at one time attributed to the

resistance of an ethereal medium pervading space; at another to the

successive transmission of the gravitating force: but as La Place proved

that neither of these causes, even if they exist, have any influence on

the motions of the lunar perigee or nodes, they could not affect the

mean motion, a variation in the latter from such a cause being

inseparably connected with variations in the two former of these

elements. That great mathematician, however, in studying the theory of

Jupiter's satellites, perceived that the secular variations in the

elements of Jupiter's orbit, from the action of the planets, occasion

corresponding changes in the motions of the satellites: this led him to

suspect that the acceleration in the mean motion of the moon might be

connected with the secular variation in the eccentricity of the

terrestrial orbit; and analysis has proved that he assigned the true

cause.

If the eccentricity of the earth's orbit were invariable, the moon would

be exposed to a variable disturbance from the action of the sun, in

consequence of the earth's annual revolution; but it would be periodic,

since it would be the same as often as the sun, the earth, and the moon

returned to the same relative positions: on account however of the slow

and incessant diminution in the eccentricity of the terrestrial orbit,

the revolution of our planet is performed at different distances from

the sun every year. The position of the moon with regard to the sun,

undergoes a corresponding change; so that the mean action of the sun on

the moon varies from one century to another, and occasions the secular

increase in the moon's velocity called the acceleration, a name which is

very appropriate in the present age, and which will continue to be so

for a vast number of ages to come; because, as long as the earth's

eccentricity diminishes, the moon's mean motion will be accelerated; but

when the eccentricity has passed its minimum and begins to increase, the

mean motion will be retarded from age to age. At present the secular

acceleration is about 10", but its effect on the moon's place increases

as the square of the time. It is remarkable that the action of the

planets thus reflected by the sun to the moon, is much more sensible

than their direct action, either on the earth or moon. The secular

diminution in the eccentricity, which has not altered the equation of

the centre of the sun by eight minutes since the earliest recorded

eclipses, has produced a variation of 1° 48' in the moon's longitude,

and of 7° 12' in her mean anomaly.

The action of the sun occasions a rapid but variable motion in the nodes

and perigee of the lunar orbit; the former, though they recede during

the greater part of the moon's revolution, and advance during the

smaller, perform their sidereal revolutions in 6793^days.4212, and the

latter, though its motion is sometimes retrograde and sometimes direct,

in 3232^days.5807, or a little more than nine years: but such is the

difference between the disturbing energy of the sun and that of all the

planets put together, that it requires no less than 109770 years for the

greater axis of the terrestrial orbit to do the same. It is evident that

the same secular variation which changes the sun's distance from the

earth, and occasions the acceleration in the moon's mean motion, must

affect the motion of the nodes and perigee; and it consequently appears,

from theory as well as observation, that both these elements are subject

to a secular inequality, arising from the variation in the eccentricity

of the earth's orbit, which connects them with the acceleration; so that

both are retarded when the mean motion is anticipated. The secular

variations in these three elements are in the ratio of the numbers 3,

0.735, and 1; whence the three motions of the moon, with regard to the

sun, to her perigee, and to her nodes, are continually accelerated, and

their secular equations are as the numbers 1, 4, and 0.265, or according

to the most recent investigations as 1, 4, 6776 and 0.391. A comparison

of ancient eclipses observed by the Arabs, Greeks, and Chaldeans,

imperfect as they are, with modern observations, perfectly confirms

these results of analysis.

Future ages will develop these great inequalities, which at some most

distant period will amount to many circumferences. They are indeed

periodic; but who shall tell their period? Millions of years must elapse

before that great cycle is accomplished; but 'such changes, though rare

in time, are frequent in eternity.'

The moon is so near, that the excess of matter at the earth's equator

occasions periodic variations in her longitude and latitude; and, as the

cause must be proportional to the effect, a comparison of these

inequalities, computed from theory, with the same given by observation,

shows that the compression of the terrestrial spheroid, or the ratio of

the difference between the polar and equatorial diameter to the diameter

of the equator is 1/305.05. It is proved analytically, that if a fluid

mass of homogeneous matter, whose particles attract each other inversely

as the square of the distance, were to revolve about an axis, as the

earth, it would assume the form of a spheroid, whose compression is

1/230. Whence it appears, that the earth is not homogeneous, but decreases

in density from its centre to its circumference. Thus the moon's eclipses

show the earth to be round, and her inequalities not only determine the

form, but the internal structure of our planet; results of analysis which

could not have been anticipated. Similar inequalities in Jupiter's

satellites prove that his mass is not homogeneous, and that his

compression is 1/13·8.

The motions of the moon have now become of more importance to the

navigator and geographer than those of any other body, from the

precision with which the longitude is determined by the occultations of

stars and lunar distances. The lunar theory is brought to such

perfection, that the times of these phenomena, observed under any

meridian, when compared with that computed for Greenwich in the Nautical

Almanack, gives the longitude of the observer within a few miles. The

accuracy of that work is obviously of extreme importance to a maritime

nation; we have reason to hope that the new Ephemeris, now in

preparation, will be by far the most perfect work of the kind that ever

has been published.

From the lunar theory, the mean distance of the sun from the earth, and

thence the whole dimensions of the solar system are known; for the

forces which retain the earth and moon in their orbits, are respectively

proportional to the radii vectores of the earth and moon, each being

divided by the square of its periodic time; and as the lunar theory

gives the ratio of the forces, the ratio of the distance of the sun and

moon from the earth is obtained: whence it appears that the sun's

distance from the earth is nearly 396 times greater than that of the

moon.

The method however of finding the absolute distances of the celestial

bodies in miles, is in fact the same with that employed in measuring

distances of terrestrial objects. From the extremities of a known base

the angles which the visual rays from the object form with it, are

measured; their sum subtracted from two right-angles gives the angle

opposite the base; therefore by trigonometry, all the angles and sides

of the triangle may be computed; consequently the distance of the object

is found. The angle under which the base of the triangle is seen from

the object, is the parallax of that object; it evidently increases and

decreases with the distance; therefore the base must be very great

indeed, to be visible at all from the celestial bodies. But the globe

itself whose dimensions are ascertained by actual admeasurement,

furnishes a standard of measures, with which we compare the distances,

masses, densities, and volumes of the sun and planets.

The courses of the great rivers, which are in general navigable to a

considerable extent, prove that the curvature of the land differs but

little from that of the ocean; and as the heights of the mountains and

continents are, at any rate, quite inconsiderable when compared with the

magnitude of the earth, its figure is understood to be determined by a

surface at every point perpendicular to the direction of gravity, or of

the plumb-line, and is the same which the sea would have if it were

continued all round the earth beneath the continents. Such is the figure

that has been measured in the following manner:--

A Preliminary Dissertation on the Mechanisms of the Heavens · 第 1 / 6 段