“One word as to my position in reference to my theological and

ecclesiastical opinions. There are different phases of Christian

truth: the moral brought out by the Apostle James, the doctrinal by

the Apostle Paul, the experimental by the Apostle Peter. One apostle

above others blended these peculiarities in himself, harmonizing them

all, like prismatic rays in ‘candid light,’ to use Bishop Warburton’s

expression—the ‘candid,’ pure, perfect light of Divine love. I have

striven to make him my model, to neglect no side of evangelical

truth, but to go all round it; and if my poor teaching under such

guidance has done any good, let God have all the praise. As to my

ecclesiastical position, I have never shrank from expressing my

opinion with regard to the Establishment principle. I am a thorough

and earnest Nonconformist. There are many reasons why I could not

conform; and I will now only mention this, that I could not surrender

my liberty to preach the gospel in the pulpits of other communions,

and to invite brethren of other communions to preach in mine. I have

not seen it my vocation to join in certain movements of the day under

the guidance of those whose practical application of Nonconformist

principles in some respects differs from my own. I am not finding

fault with them, and I hope they will not find fault with me. Let us

agree to differ. One great object of my life has been rather to

improve our own denomination, than to criticise and censure others;

and also to cultivate loving relationship with other Churches, and it

is my peculiar joy that my life aim in this respect has been

generously recognised and reciprocated.”

Speeches were then delivered by Dr. Punshon, Sir Thomas Chambers, Dr.

Angus, Mr. Richard (Dr. Stoughton’s fellow-student), the Rev. Guinness

Rogers, and Mr. Henry Wright,—a friend who had become deacon of the

Church during Dr. Stoughton’s ministry, and had been especially active in

connection with the testimonial. Some playful allusions were made in the

course of the evening. One was by the Dean, who said it was a custom

amongst the monks at Westminster to call a brother who had been amongst

them thirty years by the gentle name of _playfellow_, and never to do

anything disagreeable in his presence. And such, he would say, was the

tranquil period which their friend had reached, yet not so as to quench

hope of his still using voice and pen for the good of others. Another

was by Mr. Richard, who referred to a debate in college days, between him

and Dr. Stoughton, on the question, “Who was the greater man, Oliver

Cromwell or Napoleon Bonaparte?” Dr. Stoughton took Cromwell, and he,

Mr. Richard, now the great political apostle of peace, then preferred

Napoleon. He supposed his friend remained true to his idol, he himself

had changed his standard of idolism. The Hon. and Rev. Canon Freemantle

pronounced the benediction.

The address, elegantly illuminated and cased in morocco and silver, was

afterwards transmitted to Ealing, and the names of contributors were read

with much interest and gratitude. Amongst them were those of rich and

poor members of the communion, and of distinguished persons outside the

Kensington Church, including noblemen and dignitaries of the

Establishment. Mention ought to be made of Archdeacon Sinclair, Vicar of

the parish. He entered on that office about the time that Dr. Stoughton

came to Kensington. The Vicar then called on him, to give a cordial

welcome, and they remained on terms of friendship down to the farewell

meeting. The congregation some time before sent a contribution towards

building the new parish church, of about £100, through their pastor’s

hands to the Vicar, who expressed the greatest delight in accepting such

a pledge of Christian catholicity. After the farewell meeting, he wrote

saying that he hoped soon to call upon his old friend in his new abode.

But he died within a few weeks of the meeting, and the first time Dr.

Stoughton occupied the pulpit at Allen Street Chapel after his

retirement, was to preach a funeral sermon for his beloved and honoured

neighbour.

VI. THE SIXTH PASTORATE.

_THE REV. ALEXANDER RALEIGH_, _D.D._

1875–1880.

NO sooner had the vacancy occurred than the Church’s attention was

directed to the Rev. G. S. Barrett, of Norwich, who had eminent

qualifications for the Kensington pastorate. He was invited to preach

before the end of April, and immediately after he had done so, steps were

taken for calling the Church together. On the 13th of May a meeting

followed, when it was resolved to invite Mr. Barrett to succeed Dr.

Stoughton. The invitation was conveyed in the form of unanimous and

cordial resolutions, to which Mr. Barrett replied before the end of the

month, saying that if he felt it would be right to leave Norwich,

Kensington would be an attractive sphere; but that after much

consideration and prayer it appeared to him a duty to remain where he

was.

The door being closed in that quarter, the deacons and the committee

appointed to assist them turned their thoughts to the Rev. Dr. Raleigh,

whom they were given to understand “might not be unwilling to remove from

his present pastorate at Canonbury to that of Kensington.” The idea of

securing so eminent a man animated all who became acquainted with it; and

previously to laying this matter before the Church, the deacons and

committee communicated with Dr. Raleigh. Delicacy and caution marked the

communications on both sides, and the result was, that on hearing a

report of the circumstances, the Church in August cordially invited Dr.

Raleigh to accept the pastorate. Again the invitation was conveyed in

the form of resolutions, and before the end of the month Dr. Raleigh

returned his answer:—

“The resolutions which were passed unanimously at your meeting of the

5th of August, were presented to me on the following morning by your

deacons, who also gave me in the frankest manner every explanation I

could desire.

“Those resolutions constitute a call to take the pastoral oversight

of you in the Lord. I have had this your desire and invitation very

much in my thought since I received the intimation of them. I have

had consultation with good men, whose judgment in the case is

dispassionate and impartial, and I need not say that I have been

asking God to ‘send forth His light and truth’ to make my way of duty

plain. Nevertheless, I cannot say that the path of duty has been

very easily found. The circumstances have been peculiar. The claims

of the two congregations to whom it has for years been my privilege

to minister have proved to be unexpectedly strong, and the mutual

trial of affection in the thought of parting has been sometimes

almost more than I could resist. Yet steadily, if slowly, the

guiding light of God’s good providence has seemed to lead westwards.

The reasons which made it possible for me to entertain the proposal

from the time when it was mentioned to me have continued, as I knew

they would do, and now, without specifying them particularly, it is

my duty to announce to you the result to which they have led me;

which is this, that I cordially accept your cordial call, and will

endeavour in Divine strength to discharge, to the best of my ability,

the duties of the sacred office to which I am thus called. May He

who has watched over your interests as a Christian Church for many

years, supplying you in successive pastorates with rich ministerial

gift and grace, and who has also blessed my humble ministry thus far,

make us blessings to each other, and in our associated capacity, to

many around us.

“I cordially appreciate the mention of the name of Dr. Stoughton,

lately your pastor, and long my friend. I do not lay claim to his

many and high accomplishments as a scholar and a theologian; but I

believe I agree with him pretty closely in doctrinal sentiment, in

holding firmly ‘the faith once delivered to the saints,’ and in

cherishing a generous and charitable temper towards all who love our

Lord Jesus Christ in sincerity; and I must now make it my endeavour

to emulate his practical care and zeal on your behalf in all

faithfulness, diligence, watchfulness, and prayer.

“If I were only beginning the Christian ministry, I might think it

necessary and appropriate to say something of the motives with which

I undertake it, and of the spirit in which it ought to be conducted.

But having been now for many years in the heat of the great strife, I

must allow those years of toil now past to speak for me concerning

what will be (‘if the Lord will’) the aims and labours of the future.

May the blessing which has never been withheld from my humble

ministry, attend it still, and through your prayers and co-operation

be even more abundant than heretofore. The grace of the Lord Jesus

Christ be with you. Amen.”

A public recognition of the new pastor took place in Allen Street in the

month of November, when Dr. Stoughton presided, and Dr. Allon, Dr.

Punshon, Dr. Edmond, the Revs. J. C. Harrison, H. Simon, and W. Roberts,

took part in the service.

Dr. Stoughton congratulated the Church on having such a pastor as they

met to recognise, and the new pastor on having such a Church as was now

assembled. He could testify that Dr. Raleigh would find at Kensington a

united and peaceful Church, a people bound together by mutual affection,

trained to work and accustomed to work, people who would never give their

pastor any occasion for uneasiness, who would always respond to his

appeal and co-operate with him in his work.

Mr. H. Wright laid a full statement before the congregation of

circumstances which led to the proceedings of that evening, after which

the chairman said, when the President of the Wesleyan Conference made way

for his successor, he did so by handing over the seals of office. He had

nothing of that sort to offer now, but if Dr. Raleigh would accept his

predecessor’s hand, there it was, not empty, but with a heart in it. Dr.

Raleigh delivered an appropriate address. Dr. Punshon, Mr. Harrison, Dr.

Edmond, and Mr. Simon followed, expressing their affection for the new

pastor and his flock.

An election of new deacons had repeatedly occurred under the former

pastorate; and in the first year of the new administration vacancies had

to be filled up by ballot. The choice of the members fell on Messrs.

Cozens-Hardy, Plater, Spicer, Fordham, White, and Watson,—the last being

son of the late senior deacon, whose death just before Dr. Stoughton’s

retirement was a heavy loss, deeply lamented by his old friend and by the

Church at large. Messrs. Fordham, Cozens-Hardy, and George White

declined the office, from inability to give time for its duties. The

rest accepted the Church’s request. True to the sympathy and love so

often expressed, the friends at Kensington were mindful of the retired

minister when he lost his beloved wife, and the following entry occurs in

the Church Book:—

“On Sunday morning, 23rd November, 1879, a solemn memorial service

was conducted by the pastor, Rev. A. Raleigh, D.D., suggested by the

death of Mrs. Stoughton, on the 11th of November, at Ealing.

“The sermon was based on the passage (2 Cor. v. 9): ‘Willing rather

to be absent from the body and to be present with the Lord,’ Dr.

Stoughton and his family being among the worshippers. The Church

wish, moreover, to record their deep sympathy with Dr. Stoughton, in

his sad bereavement, and cherish the memory of Mrs. Stoughton as one

who, during her husband’s long pastorate of thirty-two years at

Kensington Chapel, co-operated with him in all his work for the

heavenly Master, and endeared herself to many as a bright example to

the flock.”

I shall be pardoned for the insertion of a single paragraph from the

beautiful sermon delivered by Dr. Raleigh on that affecting occasion. It

is no less true than beautiful:—

“Fitted by education and culture for any place in social life, it

might have been thought by some that she would be among the foremost

always in visible activities and good works. She was indeed always

active, and was always engaged in doing good; but always as much as

possible in silent and unseen ways. She was not one who could say,

in view of the many things that might be done by one in her position,

of a more or less public kind, ‘therefore being always confident.’

Rather she loved and sought the shade; if a sweet and calm and

all-helpful domestic life may be called the shade, to a lady of deep

piety and high culture. She strove to make home good and happy, and

succeeded; every child following father and mother in Divine ways,

and into the Church of God; and then she strove to extend the

blessedness to as many other homes as possible. I know not that we

could have a much nobler ideal and pattern of a woman’s life. I have

it on the best authority, that of a ministerial friend who was like a

brother in the house, that many and many a poor minister’s home in

the country was made warmer and brighter, and more what home ought to

be, by her generous persistence of care for them, and by the gentle

importunity of her letters to others on their behalf. Her power of

letter-writing was unique; all who were privileged to receive these

letters, on any subject, but especially on Divine and spiritual

subjects, felt the charm, and valued the more the friendship of one

who could write so for God and for men. Her last years were weighted

with deepening affliction; yet were they calm and peaceful years to

the last. For months she waited on the border land, looking

heavenwards, thinking often no doubt of the loved ones who had gone

before, and who, as I have been told by one who well knows, often

seemed very near to her. The few who saw her felt that they had been

nearer heaven by only looking on her face and listening to the few

words she might say. These words were words of thankfulness for all

past mercies, of humble but firm faith in the Saviour, and of calm,

confident hope as to the future.

“These words were found afterwards in her own handwriting:

‘Father, take my hand; quickly and straight

Lead to heaven’s gate Thy child.’

‘Quickly and straight,’ even as she desired, the gate was opened; and

the Father’s child went in, went home.”

With regard to Dr. Raleigh’s ministry at Kensington, I cannot do better

than quote the following words of his beloved wife:—

“There is little to record of the years at Kensington. Like those of

his first ministry at Rotherham, they flowed evenly and sweetly; but

many hearts hold them as a sacred memory, and to himself they were

years of much happiness. He was able to work with vigour, and his

people came around him with growing affection. To none was his

ministry more dear than to those engaged in direct Christian work.

He clasped hands with them as fellow-workers; the fervour of his zeal

kindled theirs, and as he spoke of the great harvest to come, earthly

honours seemed to grow poor compared with the honour of bearing and

sowing the precious seed of God. ‘By kindness, by love unfeigned,’

he won his way to the affections of his people. And he gave them as

he had promised, ‘good work,’ work which cost him laborious days, and

to which he brought all the treasures of his long experience. His

sermons were less ornate, perhaps, than those of an earlier time, but

they were more definite in aim, more unencumbered in utterance, as if

knowing that his time was short, he had laid ‘aside every weight,’

that the simple truth might have free course. His teaching began to

be regarded with quick appreciation, and some of his hearers, men in

busy life, acknowledged that ‘the whole week was different and better

because of the thoughts with which it was begun.’

“‘These Sundays at Kensington,’ writes one of his people, ‘were times

of refreshment from the presence of the Lord. The sound of his

fervid utterances of heavenly truth seem still to linger on the ear.

We bless God that He sent him to us, and for all the messages of love

He enabled him to declare, and for the glimpses of heaven he seemed

to open to our sight.’

“Throughout his teaching and in his own heart, the mystic attraction

of heaven was always strong. But especially was this a very

pronounced feature of his latest ministry. He hardly preached a

sermon in which he did not lift up his eyes to the ‘everlasting

hills.’

“It is a blessed thing that sin has never effaced the deep

home-longings of human hearts, and no words were more welcome than

those in which he told of that world, ‘where prayer is answered, and

toil is recompensed, and love claims her own.’ Or of ‘the open

pathway, stretching upward and afar, for home-going saints and holy

angels.’ Or of ‘the banquet’ where, ‘in its earthly beginning we may

wet our bread with tears as we eat it, but whence we shall go to the

higher and better, God has in reserve, as we pass along to meet all

the good of every age, and to see Him in His glory at the banquet,

and in the fellowship of heaven.’

“He had himself got to the heavenward side of life. He was as busy

as he had ever been, entering fully into the work, thinking and

planning about it, as if he were still young, and life all before

him, and his interest in public and passing events continued

unquenched. Yet, and this is no fancy, a deep peace seemed to have

come down upon him, with silent expectancy in it, as if he stood at

the meeting-place of the two worlds and took both into his field of

vision. The depressions of former years were gone, and but that our

‘eyes were holden’ by a merciful blindness, we might have known that

the Master’s coming was at hand.”

The population in South Kensington by this time had enormously increased.

The relics of rural life repeatedly noticed in this volume disappeared,

and the crowded neighbourhood called for spiritual provision. At a

social meeting in January, 1879, a resolution was passed expressive of

gratitude for the goodness of God, and of a conviction that the time had

come for making a vigorous effort to extend to one of the newly-peopled

districts in the neighbourhood some of the privileges which the Church

had so long enjoyed; and a year afterwards, at a similar meeting, joy was

expressed that a good site had been found in West Kensington, together

with a determination to erect on it a chapel worthy of the neighbourhood.

It is sad to record what follows. Dr. Raleigh removed to Kensington at

the close of the year 1875, early in 1880 he was laid aside. On the 10th

of March he sent to his “Flock and Friends” this touching letter:—

“I must try to write a line to tell you what a great grief it is to

me that I am still prevented from meeting you ‘face to face.’ Pain

and weariness have been my portion during these last weeks. But God

has upheld me by His great goodness, and enabled me to cast all my

care upon Him, and to commit all my ways to Him. Indeed, I may say I

have but one serious care, the care that arises in my heart when I

think of you and of your interests in the Gospel, which I can at

present do little or nothing to promote. I know you are being well

instructed by other servants of the Master, and that the Chief

Shepherd Himself never ceases to have you in His care. Nor can I

doubt that this unexpected and undesired illness of your pastor is

among the ‘all things’ which may work together for your good. With

prayer and patience on your part and on mine it will certainly be so,

and our God will supply all our need according to His glorious riches

by Christ Jesus.

“I am assured by the deacons, both for themselves and for you, that I

may go on in the use of the best means for recovery with a quiet

mind, and in the confidence that you will willingly and prayerfully

wait for my restoration to strength, and for what—if God graciously

gives it—will certainly be to me, even more than to you, a happy

return to my work. Of course all waiting of this kind must have

reasonable limits; but I think you may be assured that I am not

likely to forget them. I thank God that I have so much reason to

wish, I hope before very long, to be able to put my hand again to a

work which, in some ways at least, has prospered so well. That this

our mutual desire may be accomplished, I cast myself with confidence

on your sympathy; and still more earnestly I make appeal to you for

your prayers, that I may be kept in unfailing trust, and that I may

be restored to you the sooner.

“And for you, dear brethren, with all my heart I commend you to God

and to the word of His grace, which is able to build you up and to

give you an inheritance among all them that are sanctified. The

Shepherd of Israel have you in His care.

“The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you.”

Dr. Raleigh’s last hours are thus described by his wife in her beautiful

memoirs of him:—

“Throughout the night of 17th April he was very restless, and said,

‘I have not been able for two days to think any religious thoughts,

but I know that I am His.’ When the morning came (Sunday) his

countenance wore the changed look we learn to know too well, and he

spoke of his departure as at hand, as indeed he felt it was. His

wife, wishing as usual to send a message to be read to his people,

asked him what it should be. He hesitated, saying, ‘I do not want to

alarm them, and it looks as if I were of such importance if I send a

message.’ He consented, however, and dictated a few words. Many

things were talked over, and last words spoken during the day. The

wrench of parting was still hard to him, and the spring sunshine

seemed too glad for dying eyes. ‘Everything is as bright as if I

were well,’ he said; but looked an earnest assent when reminded that

in this lay the hidden promise of a better spring-time. Some food

being brought him, of which he tried in vain to partake, he put it

gently aside, saying, ‘The Bread of Life is near.’ Again: ‘I should

like to go to-day; it is _my_ day.’ His whispered words to his

children; his expressed thoughts and cares about their future; his

last looks of love and welcome, are laid up in the sacred silence of

the heart ‘till the day dawn.’

“As the evening drew on he became restless with the restlessness so

common at the approach of death. The weary spirit, finding home no

longer in the dissolving body, was struggling to break the chain and

enter into the life of liberty. The eyes, always so responsive to

the light, grew dim, unconsciousness fell gradually over him, and

before we knew it he was away beyond reach of loving word or touch of

ours; but we believe he was not beyond the reach of higher

ministries. As the long night passed, and the slow dawn found him

still waiting at the gate, perhaps there came to his spirit the first

whispers of heavenly fellowship. Perhaps ‘Jesus Himself drew near

and went with him.’ Shortly after noon on Monday, 19th of April,

1880, he entered calmly into rest.”

It was the first time that Death had laid his hand on any of the

Kensington pastors until after their removal from the neighbourhood, and

the new visitation was keenly felt. This was testified in many ways,

especially by the public funeral on the 24th of April, 1880. A service

was held in the chapel, attended by a large concourse of ministerial and

other friends. The Rev. J. G. Rogers delivered a funeral oration,

dwelling upon the character of his deceased friend and fellow-student.

The procession afterwards wound its solemn way to Abney Park. “When the

_cortége_ approached, all were hushed to silence and many an eye was wet

with tears. The line of spectators stretched from the Church Street

entrance gates, past the open grave, and overlapping but not surrounding

it. Hardly a sound was heard but the grating of the footsteps of the

bearers of the coffin and the procession on the gravel. Preceded by the

Rev. Henry Allon, D.D.; the Rev. J. Guinness Rogers; the Rev. Mr. Glyn,

Vicar of Kensington; and the Rev. W. M. Statham; and followed by all Dr.

Raleigh’s children (except the eldest) and other members of his family,

and various friends and delegates, the coffin, literally covered and

re-covered with flowers, was borne to the tomb. Then Dr. Allon conducted

the solemn service, in which the Rev. Mr. Glyn took part; after which all

who desired had an opportunity of taking a last look at the grave, and

many deposited there their offering of flowers—their symbol of affection.

Presently the earth would be covered in, and all would be over.”

Funeral sermons were preached at Kensington Chapel on the following

Sunday by Dr. Allon and Mr. Rogers.

* * * * *

To resume the mode of expression adopted in the earlier portion of this

volume, and only dropped in describing the pastorate preceding that of

Dr. Raleigh, I shall ever deeply regret that, through absence from

England, I was unable to take any part in these solemnities. I was not

aware of his serious illness until the fact was communicated to me in

Rome, and scarcely had I received the sad intimation when the news of his

death arrived; and I was shocked to find that the dear Kensington Church

was again destitute, and that I had lost an honoured friend.

VII. THE SEVENTH PASTORATE.

_THE REV. COLMER B. SYMES_.

1880—

Congregationalism in the Court Suburb · 第 6 / 7 段