A. V. HT.

Varnhagen’s diary of Dec. 3d, 1857, reads as follows: “I called on

Humboldt; M. von Olfers was just going, and told me that Rauch had died

in Dresden. Next General Count von der Groeben took his leave; he was

very cordial, and pleased with my offer to send him a man who will

republish the poems of Schenkendorf. Humboldt was full of cordiality for

Ludmilla and myself; told me about the King, about Schoenlein, about the

Princess of Prussia, about Doctor Lassalle, whose work[97] he had read

accurately in three nights, and of Friesen; spoke of the ‘Kreuz Zeitung’

with contempt, praised the Count von der Groeben as a man of honor, and

von der Heydt for his determination to leave the cabinet. He had a

letter from the Queen. The King wishes to see him, and he therefore

drives to Charlottenburg. He is hale and hearty. I read much in

Lassalle. Even the external appearance of so great and important a work

excites reverence. On me it makes peculiar impression to witness the

downfall, one by one, of the stays and rivets by which my inveterate

opinions have been upheld. Every one who has grown old has to observe

and experience such things; but in our times the changes are quicker and

more powerful than in former times, and I am peculiarly sensible to

them. Even where the contents do not matter to me, where I do not lose

in the matter, because the subjects do not belong directly to my

province, the phenomenon is nevertheless somewhat disagreeable. Such is

again my lot in regard to Schleiermacher; his work on Heraclitus was

hitherto the last word, the final disposition of all questions relating

to that philosopher; even Hegel’s adverse hints had not been able to

overturn this authority. One could rest upon it as on a downy pillow,

when lo! a new critic comes, and snatches it from under us. True,

Lassalle supplies its place with another, which is large and well

stuffed, but still the change is uncomfortable. And yet I am pleased

with this unrest of intellectual efforts, this ingenuity, learning,

progress, which asks no fear or favor.”

218.

HUMBOLDT TO VARNHAGEN.

BERLIN, _January 11th, 1858_.

REVERED FRIEND,—I, too, am a sufferer from the returning cutaneous

affection, an unwelcome consequence of old age. You have, at least,

unconditional freedom, and can attend to your comfort; to me there is no

freedom granted; I am molested by all; most unmercifully and inexorably

by the mail. The kind memento of Mrs. Sarah Martin is very honorable to

me. I owe it, like many other things, to you. Suffer me to make you the

interpreter of my gratitude and of my faithful reverence for the

talented lady, and for her brother, so dear to me, Mr. John Taylor. The

news from Livingstone interests me chiefly on account of his views of

the susceptibility of the negro race to civilization, at a time when

France on the one hand, and North America on the other, are most

shamelessly subserving the capture of slaves in Africa, under the flimsy

pretext of introducing free laborers. The political news from India, by

Captain Meadows Taylor, was unimportant. Perhaps it is agreeable to you

to add to your archives some original letters of Count Walewski, Prince

Napoleon, who goes to Egypt, son of King Jerome, Lord Stratford de

Redcliffe, and a copy of a very finely-written letter of the Pasha of

Egypt, the original of which I was obliged to present to Dr. Brugsch.

Dr. Michael Sachs could not be prevented from celebrating me in

Hebrew.[98] Many kind greetings to the noble General von Pfuel, whom I

shall visit as soon as possible.

Yours faithfully, always equally illegible,

Letters of Alexander von Humboldt to Varnhagen von Ense. From 1827 to 1858. With extracts from Varnhagen's diaries, and letters of Varnhagen and others to Humboldt · 第 200 / 252 题